Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

March 23rd, 2009:

Extreme Birth

For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

Link to article

The fearless—some say too fearless—new leader of the home-birth movement.
By Andrew Goldman
Published Mar 22, 2009

On a dreary morning not long ago, Cara Muhlhahn is tooling through Brooklyn in her dented Prius, which she calls her “Mobile On-Call Unit.” Since Muhlhahn is a home-birth midwife, appointments both prenatal and postnatal—and, of course, the big show itself—take place within clients’ homes, and she spends a great deal of her time speeding between boroughs and racking up two grand a year in parking tickets …

This morning’s first appointment … is Kristy Bloom … Bloom is a first-time mother … in her 38th week of pregnancy. In her first weeks of pregnancy, she’d watched the 2008 Ricki Lake–produced low-budget documentary The Business of Being Born. “I cried through the whole movie,” she says. “And then I was in the bathtub and I had this whole vision of the birth and Cara was there. And I came out of the bath and said, ‘Babe, that woman’s going to be our midwife.’ ”

Since participating in The Business of Being Born … Muhlhahn has become the most visible proselytizer of the home-birth movement. She just released a memoir called Labor of Love, in which she headily describes her work: “Day after day, I deliver babies, save lives, facilitate and witness near miracles.” … she’s hoping to grow her home-birth service to handle the increasing demand in New York.

You couldn’t ask for a better home-birth sales pitch than BOBB. The film presents a horrifically plausible portrayal of a hospital childbirth system gone insane, of labor turned into a medical pathology: the continuous fetal heart-rate monitoring that makes it difficult for a mother to get off her back and into a position that actually encourages birth; the fear of lawsuits that compels doctors to perform C-sections on babies experiencing even normal distress during labor; the “failure to progress”—medicalese for laboring in a rentable hospital bed too long—that causes doctors to initiate a chain of “unnecessary interventions” like the artificial-induction hormone pitocin paired with epidural anesthesia, which seem to manufacture their own fetal distress, which in turn produces more C sections … [which] has done nothing to improve infant- or maternal-mortality statistics.

BOBB didn’t really break news, but it did introduce the natural-birth argument to a new mainstream audience. More than anything else, BOBB de-radicalized home birth, conflating it with garden-variety natural childbirth and allowing Muhlhahn, largely unchallenged, to argue for its safety. There are only two options when it comes to childbirth, the film seems to say, comparing shots of ecstatic mothers hoisting their babies at home with shots of women under bad hospital light screaming for rescue.

Muhlhahn is offered up as the eminently reasonable alternative to the medical mess, shown in her East Village apartment in the predawn hours, tucking her instruments into a doctor’s bag, looking like the medical pro she is, a dean’s-list graduate from Columbia’s School of Nursing … She looks nothing like the hippie-midwife stereotype. “Downright sexy” is how Ricki Lake has described Muhlhahn, a youthful 51-year-old with low-rise jeans and a husky Debra Winger laugh.

She also doesn’t practice like a typical midwife. Personal experience has led her to dismiss many of what she calls the “myths” that are still taught in school as the bedrock of safe practice. The big babies … are nothing more than “fit challenges” to Muhlhahn, necessitating only patience. She regularly does vaginal births after C-section at home, and has even home-delivered the riskiest births, breeches and twins …
….
But even more essential than promised nirvana or perfect aesthetics is the implication that messing with the birthing process can affect the bonding between mother and child. In BOBB, French obstetrician and natural-birth pioneer Michel Odent contends that a “complex cocktail of love hormones … create a state of dependency, addiction” between mother and child. Interrupting that natural flow with drugs or a Cesarean, he posits, invites dire consequences. “It’s simple,” he says. “If monkeys give birth by Cesarean section, the mother is not interested in her baby … So you wonder, what about … the future of humanity?”

When you ask Muhlhahn’s many happy customers to recount their birth stories, they struggle a bit; you suspect they feel the way an astronaut might attempting to describe space travel to someone who’s never flown in a plane. “When you get through that transition, and you experience the birth of your child, you get the endorphins, the best bonding experience … ,” says Jeannie Gaffigan, who delivered her second child with Muhlhahn. … women turn to Muhlhahn because she inspires confidence in them—confidence in her clinical skills and knowledge of the birth process but also confidence that their bodies are fully capable of the arduous task. Her admirers say that she’s gifted at intuiting when a laboring mother needs cheerleading and hand-holding and when she needs her to step back and leave her to labor in peace …

But labor is an unpredictable thing, and sometimes the experience is more nightmarish than poetic. Muhlhahn’s patient Sandra Garcia was one week overdue when her water finally broke on a Sunday night in early November. She labored that night and through the next day assisted by her husband, Jeff Wise, and her doula, a former NYU postpartum nurse who was now working for Muhlhahn. (Muhlhahn, busy with another labor, appeared only sporadically.)

Monday night, Garcia was approaching 24 hours of labor. Most hospitals insist that a baby be delivered no more than 24 hours after membrane rupture because of the risk of infection, but Muhlhahn isn’t a big clock-watcher. Instead, she takes precautions to avoid infections: “After rupture,” she says, “no routine exams, no baths, no sex.” By 10 p.m., the doula decided that Garcia was about to deliver. So, with candles lit, Garcia got in the birthing tub, which, because of the risk of infection, represents the endgame, the mother’s pushing venue. Except it wasn’t time to push. At Garcia’s insistence, Muhlhahn performed an exam at around 3:30 a.m. and discovered she was only a half-inch dilated. The doula had somehow misjudged her progression. Still, Muhlhahn wasn’t concerned. “There’s no such thing as stalled labor,” they remember her assuring them. “Labor just takes a long time.” With that, she left to deliver another baby.

Late Wednesday afternoon, nearly 72 hours into his wife’s labor, Wise started to freak out. The doula had gone home to rest. It was getting dark. They had no instrument to check the baby’s heart rate. His wife’s face was pallid, her knees and elbows raw from supporting her weight during the contractions …

“How long is too long for a woman to be in labor?” Wise demanded to know when Muhlhahn finally returned to the apartment that night. “Never,” Muhlhahn replied flatly. Her philosophy was simple: Trust the wisdom of the body to send the baby out when it’s ready. But she agreed to examine Garcia again. If she hadn’t progressed significantly, they’d go to St. Vincent’s. The results were startling: two centimeters. She had hardly progressed at all.

Garcia crouched on all fours in the back seat of Muhlhahn’s Prius as they drove to the hospital … The next morning, Garcia woke with a 103-degree fever, a sign of infection … after 84 hours of labor, she was still less than five centimeters dilated. The baby had to come out by C-section. Remment Garcia Wise weighed in at eight pounds, eleven ounces, about two pounds more than Muhlhahn had estimated. Rem was whisked away to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, where he stayed for five days …

“How do you feel about having a C-section?” Muhlhahn asked the couple at a follow-up appointment to discuss what had happened … Garcia felt the question was barbed with the implication that if she’d only had more patience—tried harder—she could have had a vaginal birth.

Muhlhahn calls St. Vincent’s her “backup hospital.” About 10 percent of her patients end up transferring there during labor. “St. Vincent’s is her dump,” says one former obstetrics resident … “She’d bring her patients in, holding their hands, find out we were going to have to do a section, and then she’s out the door.” [In Austrtalia, the mdiwife generally stays with the woman in the case of transfer].

There is, of course, a long-standing animosity between doctors and midwives, particularly those who take births out of hospitals. In a 2008 policy statement, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reiterated its position against home birth: “Childbirth decisions should not be dictated or influenced by what’s fashionable, trendy, or the latest cause célèbre.” But St. Vincent’s seems to have bridged the divide better than most hospitals. George Mussalli, the chairman of obstetrics and gynecology since 2006, has fostered much goodwill within the midwifery community. … JJB Midwifery actually have hospital privileges there.
….
For all her home-birth successes—she has delivered more than 700 babies—Muhlhahn has also had some tragedies. In 2003, she and her former birthing center settled a $950,000 malpractice suit brought by the parents of a child who was injured during delivery. As the baby’s head was crowning, he suffered a shoulder dystocia, when a baby’s shoulders get stuck behind the mother’s pelvis. It was imperative to get the baby out quickly, because he couldn’t breathe in that position … The child survived, but the cervical nerves in his neck were damaged, rendering his right arm paralyzed, a condition called Erb’s Palsy … Garcia’s complaint argued that Muhlhahn should have known that the baby would be too large for a vaginal delivery. [There's no way of knowing with certainty if a baby will fit or not. Shoulder dystocia can happen at home or in hospital; some would argue that it's more likely in hospital because women are usually restricted to birthing on their back].
….

The panel’s star, however, might be Jessica Robinson, who receives gasps from the impressed crowd for revealing a thumbnail of her experience: 76 hours of labor, which included a 30-block walk on her third day and an episode in which Muhlhahn had to coax her out of the bathroom of a Brooklyn acupuncturist’s office. The adventure eventually yielded a ten-pound, twelve-ounce boy, the heaviest baby Muhlhahn had ever delivered to a primip. “It just seemed,” Muhlhahn says, savoring the victory, “like a completely normal delivery.”

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting.

Federal review rejects funding for home births

For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

Link to article

HOME births could be pushed underground in “fragile, secretive arrangements” after a Federal review rejected funding for the practice, an academic says.

A review of maternity services … has recommended changes to Commonwealth funding arrangements to support a greater role for midwives.

It also suggests the Government provide professional indemnity insurance support to midwives, but rejects Commonwealth funding for home births.

Leading midwifery expert Jennifer Cameron … said moves to regulate the role of independent midwives in home births was not in the best interests of women.

“The report was very clear in that it did not support reforms that increased or funded women’s access to home birth,” she said.

“Women will continue to have babies at home; removing independent midwives and saying we won’t do home births won’t solve the problem.

“Most women birthing at home without a trained caregiver do so because they are unable to access midwifery care at home, and are unwilling to use hospital-based services … Ms Cameron said more women would be “pushed into” unattended home births.

- I firmly believe that what needs to occue is a reform os hospital birth services so that women with “high risk” situations such as VBAC, breech, twins etc can have natural births in hospital. The Maternity Services Review paves the way for this to happen.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting.

Home deliveries

For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

Link to article

John Elder
March 22, 2009

JANET Fraser is in labour. Her plan is to drop the baby on the loungeroom floor, or wherever feels good at the time. Has she called the hospital to let them know what’s happening? “When you go on a skiing trip, do you call the hospital to say, ‘I’m coming down the mountain, can you set aside a spot for me in the emergency room?’ I don’t think so,” says Fraser, whose breathing sounds strained.

This is pretty much where we end the conversation that started with me calling Fraser and asking if it was true that her organisation, Joyous Birth, was advocating that women go it alone giving birth at home, with no midwife

“Free-birthing, plenty of women do it,” she says. In fact, Fraser is doing it right now. “I prefer to be an autonomous care-provider,” she says.

By the time she tells me the birth of her third child is “impending”, Fraser has already talked intensely about the likelihood that home births attended by midwives will be illegal from July next year, when the national registration scheme for health professionals kicks in …

She has also talked about how the Joyous Birth group, of which she is national convener, wasn’t encouraging women to free-birth as a means of flouting the law, but to run their pregnancies and birthing in the manner they desire.

“If that happens to be free-birth, then you go for it … We don’t advocate hospital-based birth or being beholden to all sorts of authority figures,” she says.

Janet Fraser’s son, 5, was planned as a home birth, but came into the world via an emergency caesarean after Fraser was transferred to hospital. Her daughter, 2, was born at home …

Fraser is 40. She hasn’t seen a doctor or any health professional since becoming pregnant this time. No ultrasound, no genetic testing, no internal examinations, no stethoscope. [Internal examinations do not form part of the routine care of pregnant women.] Does she have any feeling for how long the labour will go? “I could do this for days. My daughter’s birth was 50-something hours. You just do it — it’s just birth, a normal physiological process.”

At the time of publication, Ms Fraser’s labour was continuing to progress slowly.

[A very small proportion of Australian choose to birth at home].

The home-birth crowd has always been loud, but if they are more strident of late it’s possibly because they are feeling left behind in an evolving birth scene, where hospital midwives are increasingly required to train for emergency situations, including home-birth complications.

St George [Hospital] is one of a number of hospitals in NSW trialling home-birth programs where two midwives are required to attend a birth, and the home births need to be sanctioned according to a set of low-risk protocols [that do not see the majority of women as low risk, and therefore the woman cannot access that services. Women are not "cleared" for home birth until 36 weeks when they have a compulsory swab to determine if they have group B strep, which may or may not be present when they do into labour, perhaps some 4 - 5 weeks later]. Independent midwives generally work alone, with a more lenient policy on risk. For example, independent midwives will home-birth twins, breech presentations and … VBACs.

The status of midwives is the key to where birthing is headed. The Maternity Services Review has recommended an expanded role for them. One option on the table would see their services covered by a Medicare rebate for the first time. However, this would not be extended to independent midwives attending home births.

There is growing enthusiasm for the case that continuous care by a midwife through the prenatal, birth and post-natal stages tends to result in happier and healthier outcomes for a pregnant woman. And that if the midwife role was expanded … then a significant portion of … hospital resources could be freed up, and the nation’s health bill somewhat reduced. [Not to mention the outcomes for women and babies would be greatly improved].

Within this context, home birth might sit more comfortably in the public mind as a viable option.

Justine Caines, secretary of Homebirth Australia, [says]: … “It’s only the home-birth mothers who have experienced one-to-one midwifery who advocate for change … The vast majority aren’t passionate about their experience basically because … The system basically treats them as someone to shuffle through. The whole passion around home birth is about the experience of one-to-one midwifery care.”

Caines sees midwives as the great hope of the overburdened health system. “We fund private obstetrics to hundreds of millions of dollars through Medicare … fees for services that don’t relate to case load. Most of it is a waste of money,” she says.

“(Federal Health Minister) Nicola Roxon could offer a $5000 birth package that would cover continuous care for each pregnancy … as opposed to women engaging in private obstetric care spending $20,000 believing they have the best care money can buy.

“I have a midwife come to my home every day for the first seven to 10 days. The most expensive is $4000 for the entire package … and no health fund covers it. People could get better, cheaper care.”

Barbara Vernon, chief executive of the Australian College of Midwives, says this message gets lost in media sensationalism sparked by organisations such as Joyous Birth and a small number of midwives who don’t make risk minimisation their primary focus, whereas most midwives working privately — and there are only 50 registered with the college, possibly 100 throughout the country — are “very risk-averse”.

“Midwives have the skills and equipment for the safe care of a mother and baby in a home-birth situation, and they recognise quickly when something’s going wrong.

“What fails to compete with the sensationalism is … the evidence showing that a trust relationship between a woman and a midwife, established from early in the pregnancy, means that the woman in labour is feeling safe and less anxious. It’s a better experience.”

Vernon says the flow-on effects of continuous midwife care include shorter labours, a reduced need for drugs and pain relief, reduced admissions to neonatal intensive care, reduced vulnerability to post-natal depression and improved rates of breastfeeding to 12 months of age.

“Even if she has a caesarean, the woman is not traumatised by the process … “It’s the women who get run over by the system that feel most vulnerable after that experience. They can’t understand why all of that happened.”

… is a hospital-governed home-birth system the answer to mainstreaming home birth? Free-birther Janet Fraser says: “It would be a disaster if hospitals ran home birth. Hospitals are dangerous.”

Justine Caine says: “Not until obstetric care is kept in check. The problem with most of (the trial schemes) is that women and midwives are not able to make decisions. Hospital midwives are handmaidens of the doctors. Obstetricians call the shots and much of the exclusion criteria is not based on evidence.”

Veteran private midwife Robyn Thompson, who has spent 30 years assisting home births, says: “It wouldn’t be a disaster. I’m welcoming whatever it takes that makes it good for women.”

Thompson says the average transfer rate over those 30 years had been about 17 per cent … “You anticipate what’s happening…”
…..
Barbara Vernon says: “RANZCOG has a position statement where home births are not endorsed. But some women are going to always birth at home.” [And therefore the approach needs to be one of harm-minimisation, not making home brith illegal by denying midwives access to professional indemnity insurance, and therefore registration].

- I guess the real question is – who owns birth? Midwives? Obstetricians? Maybe it’s time for women to claim birth.
……
Home-birth advocates insist that doctors only have a role to play when a birth becomes problematic. They say doctor intervention has led to skyrocketing induction, epidural and caesarean rates, issues that were at the heart of the Maternity Services Review. [And this is true. Midwives do not intervene in these ways. We cannot perform caesareans, we do not authorise inductions and we cannot insert epidurals. These are in the medical domain.]

In April 2007, Melbourne lawyer Ann Catchlove was told by her obstetrician that she needed a caesarean with her first child because her pelvis was not big enough. “He said, ‘You can keep going if you want but we’ll still be here at 3am’,” she says … The doctor told Catchlove that her future babies would have to be delivered by caesarean. Research on the internet convinced her otherwise. “I found the original caesarean probably wasn’t necessary.”

She also found research that indicated vaginal birth after caesarean was a reasonable option. She started thinking about a birth centre “but none of them would accept me”.

Last November she gave birth to a son at home. “… once I’d made the decision, and met the midwives, I never had any doubts. There’s an idea of hippies burning incense in the background, which is wrong. They were very focused on safety … the birth itself was very smooth and relaxed, other than the pain. I felt very safe and in control.”

Obstetrician Pieter Mourik warns ominously that graveyards are full of “failed home births”. He has called Janet Fraser’s Joyous Birth group “a bunch of nutters” and Fraser herself “a fool”. When told Fraser was free-birthing at home, Mourik was quieter than usual, less on the soapbox.

Fraser had said she didn’t expect anything to happen for another couple of days; that nothing bad happened quickly in a labour and that there would be time to get to hospital if things went wrong.

Mourik paused. “She told me (during a debate) she’d had a caesarean. That’s how a uterus is most likely to rupture. If that happens, there won’t be time … Well, I wish her well.”

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting.