0

Bathurst caesarean blood policy urged is for all of NSW

Posted by Melissa Maimann on Jun 17, 2009 in Caesarean, Obstetrics

For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

Link

Changes … at Bathurst hospital since the “preventable” death of a woman who had just given birth should extend to all NSW hospitals, a coroner says.

… He was handing down the findings of his inquest into the death of Rebecca Murray, 29, who died after the caesarean … of her healthy third child at Bathurst Base Hospital in June 2007.

She died of multi-system organ failure following postpartum haemorrhage …

… the hospital failed to check her blood type and ensure it had adequate supplies before the caesarean.

… some supplies had to be sent from Orange Base Hospital – 55km away …

“Had a full blood count … and/or cross matching been done, Mrs Murray would have received blood transfusions at an earlier time and her death would have been prevented,” …

He also said the recovery room nurse had been inadequately trained.

Instead of immediately calling for help when Mrs Murray’s blood pressure and pulse dramatically changed, she felt the priority was cleaning up the blood the patient was losing.

… the responsibility rested “squarely on the shoulders of hospital administrators” to ensure appropriately skilled staff were available for patients.

At the start of the inquest on June 1, NSW health authorities apologised to Mrs Murray’s family, informing them that Bathurst Base Hospital now enforced the new blood count and supply policy.

But Milovanovich was told this practice had not been implemented across NSW.

“If the unexpected and avoidable death of a young mother at Bathurst justifies a change in policy at Bathurst Base Hospital, why should that policy not extend statewide,” he said.

… “It is important that we take all steps to ensure the problems that occurred in this case will not be repeated as far as possible,” he said.

It’s great that they’re acting on their mistakes, but what about the central issue: preventing preventable caesareans? This woman most likely had an avoidable caesarean. It was her third baby, and her baby was breech. Would a vaginal birth have been so risky for her? we know that rates of haemorrhage are higher for caesareans than for vaginal births.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
0

Outcomes for births booked under an independent midwife and births in NHS maternity units

Posted by Melissa Maimann on Jun 17, 2009 in Home birth, Midwifery, Normal Birth

For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

Link

This article compares outcomes for women using independent midwives versus the NHS. It concludes:

While clinical outcomes across a range of variables were significantly better for women accessing an independent midwife, the significantly higher perinatal mortality rates for high risk cases in this group indicate an urgent need for a review of these cases. The significantly higher prematurity and admission rates to intensive care in the NHS cohort also indicate an urgent need for review.

A very sensible comment was left at another site:

“Once again we find that an independent homebirth for NORMAL pregnancy is better than a hospital birth. Your baby will have a higher birth weight, is less likely to be premature and in intensive care. You’re more likely to start labour spontaneously and breastfeed, and will use fewer drugs. High-risk women who choose an independent midwife should be allowed to deliver in hospital, it is the policy of not allowing independent midwives access to NHS hospitals that puts these women at risk.” – Antony Wright, London

I couldn’t have said it better!

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Copyright © 2010 Private Midwife: Homebirth & Hospital Birth All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek.