Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

August, 2010:

Health Risks To Infants Outweigh Convenience Of Elective Deliveries

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

Medical experts point to a disturbing trend of expectant mothers who are choosing to deliver their babies for non-medical reasons before 39 weeks of pregnancy. Research published in the July 2010 issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology reveals just how prevalent elective deliveries are in the U.S. In that study of 7,804 women giving birth for the first time, labor was induced in 43.6 percent of the women, and 39.9 percent of those were elective inductions.

A startling number of first-time mothers – 92 percent — believe it’s safe to deliver a baby before 39 weeks, according to a recent UnitedHealthcare survey of 650 insured, first-time mothers …

… “Unfortunately, many expectant mothers are not aware of the risks associated with early elective C-sections and induced labor. Expectant mothers may believe that at 36 weeks they have completed their nine months of pregnancy, but Mother Nature’s formula for healthy babies is actually 40 weeks,” Dr. Groat says.

… babies born electively by C-section at 37 weeks were twice as likely to have health problems, usually respiratory in nature, than babies born at 39 weeks or later. Infants delivered preterm are at an increased risk of developing chronic lung disease, cerebral palsy, learning disabilities and behavioral problems.

“The results of recent studies stress the importance of educating expectant mothers on the risks associated with elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks. These early-term births can result in the newborn’s admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, which increases the baby’s hospital stay and health risks,” …

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Test could predict which mothers will need Caesareans

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

A test which could stop women labouring for hours in the hope of a “normal” birth only to end up with a Caesarean section has been developed in Sweden.

Researchers have established that when high levels of lactic acid are measured in the amniotic fluid, it is unlikely the mother will deliver vaginally.

Measuring this acid could help decide whether to end a difficult labour and opt for a Caesarean earlier.

The test is being rolled out in a number of European hospitals.

Prolonged labours which end up in a Caesarean section are seen by many as the worst of all worlds.

In the UK, despite the mantra “too posh to push” more than half of Caesareans are emergency rather than elective procedures, in which the mother frequently undergoes a long and painful labour before an urgent operation is deemed necessary to protect the health of both her and her baby.

… the uterus produces lactic acid as other muscles do when they work hard, but that when it reaches a certain level the substance starts to inhibit contractions.

… The hormone oxytocin is usually administered in cases of slow labours to stimulate the uterus into contracting, but not all labouring women respond to it.

… the test should help doctors establish which women may go on to deliver vaginally, as low levels of lactic acid suggest the uterus could still produce the contractions needed to push out the baby.

“But a high level of lactic acid in the amniotic fluid indicates that the uterus is exhausted. To stimulate this kind of labour with an oxytocin infusion would be like asking a marathon runner to run an extra 10,000 metres after he or she has passed the finish line.”

He says the system of testing, which has already started in hospitals in Sweden, Norway and Belgium, should reduce the number of Caesareans for women who may not need them and accelerate them for those that do to “avoid the risk of complications from a long birth and limit unnecessary suffering” …

What is not considered here is the option to rest a tired woman – and then let nature re-commence the labour when the mother and baby are well-rested. There is no questioning of the idea that once labour commences, it must accelerate and lead to the birth of the baby and placenta within a certain time frame. For many reasons, some women will pause in their labours. It might be that they’re tired, hungry, bub isn’t in an optimal position, or a uterus that has worked hard and needs a rest. Resting, re-fuelling and waiting for nature to take its course – provided all is well with the baby – is a reasonable approach to a labour that is progressing slowly. I doubt that this test will reduce caesarean rates; rather I fear it will increase the caesarean rates.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Mum nurses baby back to life

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

AN Australian mum has made headlines worldwide after cuddling her tiny baby back to life.
The grieving mother had given up hope of saving newborn Jamie, after doctors pronounced the tiny boy dead.

While Jamie’s twin sister, Emily, was delivered safely, doctors worked for about 20 minutes to get premature Jamie to breathe before declaring that he couldn’t be saved.

… “I unwrapped Jamie from his blanket. He was very limp. I took my gown off and arranged him on my chest with his head over my arm and just held him. He wasn’t moving at all and we just started talking to him.”

Ms Oggs said she and her husband, David, had given up saving Jamie, who was born at 27 weeks and weighed less than 1kg.

… after about two hours of being hugged, touched and spoken to, little Jamie miraculously showed signs of life.

“Jamie occasionally gasped for air, which doctors said was a reflex action,” Ms Oggs said.

“But then I felt him move as if he were startled, then he started gasping more and more regularly.

“I gave Jamie some breast milk on my finger, he took it and started regular breathing.”

… “A short time later he opened his eyes. It was a miracle,” Ms Oggs said.

“Then he held out his hand and grabbed my finger.

“He opened his eyes and moved his head from side to side. The doctor kept shaking his head, saying, ‘I don’t believe it’.”

The Sydney mum spoke publicly to highlight the importance of skin-on-skin care for sick babies.

The technique, known as kangaroo care, is often used in neo-natal wards and is thought to promote a more stable temperature, better breathing and weight gain …

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Home births in Wales double over decade

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

I live for the day that we have these headlines here in Australia!

The number of women who give birth to their children at home in Wales has more than doubled in less than a decade …

Since 2002 … they have risen from 604 to approximately 1,395 last year.

There has also been a rise in women giving birth in midwife-led units.

… the assembly government has encouraged healthy women with low-risk pregnancies to have their babies out of hospitals.

In 2002, maternity services in Wales were asked to reach a 10% home birth rate by 2007, making it the only nation in the UK to have a target.

Midwives say that while it was a very ambitious aim and many areas have not managed to reach it, it has helped transform the choice in maternity services.

On average, 4% of births in Wales last year were at home, which is higher than the UK average of 3%.

Laura Williams gave birth to her daughter Megan at home in Porthcawl, Bridgend county, on 5 November, 2009.

… “I wanted to be in a more comfortable environment – I liked the fact that with a home birth I could use my own shower and sit on my own sofa.

“As it was, I had a fantastic birth at home. I borrowed a friend’s pool and was really relaxed. The midwife even cleared everything up afterwards – I saw no mess.

… “I also think the fact I was at home and relaxed helped my recovery from the birth – the next day I was up and about and even popped to the shops.”

… “Midwives are continuing to work towards it because many see the benefits home births bring.

“They are cost effective in that women don’t need to stay in hospitals.

“And for the mother, there is less risk of medical intervention, the birth is well planned, she is in a relaxed environment and often doesn’t have to leave other children.”

… Rather than staffing a large obstetric unit at a hospital, which midwives have to do in more populated areas, they can “focus on staffing women’s needs”, she said.

… The issue of home births has been in the headlines recently after medical journal The Lancet said mothers-to-be should not be able to opt for them if they put their babies at risk. Under UK law women can override medical advice.

It came after research published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology suggested home births were more risky than hospital delivery.

But the Royal College of Midwives said the research was “flawed”, and the assembly government insisted that only women with low-risk pregnancies were encouraged to have their children at home.

The chief nursing officer for Wales, Rosemary Kennedy, said: “It is for midwives and other health professionals to explain to pregnant women the birthing options available to them, and decide on the most appropriate option after considering their medical history and preferences.”…

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

The Emergency Caesarean

The “Emergency” Caesarean. Watch it until the end. It’s priceless!

Bonding, Oxytocin and Fatherhood

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

The hormone oxytocin has come under intensive study in light of emerging evidence that its release contributes to the social bonding that occurs between lovers, friends, and colleagues. Oxytocin also plays an important role in birth and maternal behavior, but until now, research had never addressed the involvement of oxytocin in the transition to fatherhood.

A fascinating new paper reports the first longitudinal data on oxytocin levels during the initiation of parenting in humans. They evaluated 160 first-time parents (80 couples) twice after the birth of their first child, at 6 weeks and 6 months, by measuring each parents’ oxytocin levels and monitoring and coding their parenting behavior.

… At both time-points, fathers’ oxytocin levels were not different from levels observed in mothers. Thus, although oxytocin release is stimulated by birth and lactation in mothers, it appears that other aspects of parenthood serve to stimulate oxytocin release in fathers.

… this finding “emphasizes the importance of providing opportunities for father-infant interactions immediately after childbirth in order to trigger the neuro-hormonal system that underlies bond formation in humans.”

The neuroscientists also found a relationship between oxytocin levels in husbands and wives. Since oxytocin levels are highly stable within individuals, this finding suggests that some mechanisms, perhaps social or hormonal factors, regulate oxytocin levels in an interactive way within couples.

Finally, the findings revealed that oxytocin levels were associated with parent-specific styles of interaction. Oxytocin was higher in mothers who provided more affectionate parenting, such as more gazing at the infant, expression of positive affect, and affectionate touch. In fathers, oxytocin was increased with more stimulatory contact, encouragement of exploration, and direction of infant attention to objects …

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

New Thinking on C-section Antibiotics

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

In order to minimize the risk of infection in mothers, women giving birth to babies by caesarean section should routinely receive antibiotics an hour before the surgery, according to a new recommendation issued Monday by a national doctor group.

Currently, women who undergo caesareans often receive antibiotics as a precaution against infection to the abdomen and uterus—but usually only after the delivery, when the umbilical cord is clamped, because of concern for the baby’s safety.

Some pediatricians worry that antibiotics administered to the mother will reach the newborn and suppress the baby’s blood bacterial count, potentially masking a serious infection in the baby unrelated to the caesarean section.

The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists examined several large, recent studies that administered antibiotics to mothers before and after caesarean deliveries. The group concluded there was no evidence of greater risk to the babies when mothers received antibiotics before surgery. Yet there was an increased benefit for the mothers in receiving the antibiotics before surgery.

… Some 8% to 10% of women who have a scheduled caesarean will acquire an infection, as will about 30% of women who have a caesarean delivery after labor has begun, because of greater exposure of the inside of the uterus to bacteria from the vagina …

In newborns, the prevalence rates for sepsis … is estimated at less than 1% of live births.

While the maternal antibiotic appears to neither help nor hinder a newborn’s chances of getting sepsis, doctors have worried that in babies who have the bacterial infection, antibiotics administered to the mother before the c-section will suppress bacteria in the babies’ blood test, resulting in a failure to detect the sepsis infection.

Some doctors, however, question whether the existing research adequately addresses the question of harm to the baby.

Concerns about masking babies’ infections are largely theoretical … While the antibiotic does cross over from the mother to the baby through the placenta, and while it could mask the blood culture, there are usually other clinical signs that a baby is sick …

But while such a change in practice could make caesarean deliveries safer, it “comes nowhere close to eliminating all the risks of a c-section,” … vaginal delivery is still the safest for mom and baby.”

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Outdated medical procedure behind catastrophic epidural injury

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

THE medication practice that led to the catastrophic neurological injuries of a Sydney woman, Grace Wang, during an epidural was phased out of other hospitals more than a decade ago.

Ms Wang was poisoned during the birth of her first child in June at St George Hospital when an antiseptic skin preparation was accidentally injected into her spinal canal in place of an anaesthetic. The case has rocked NSW Health and shocked the public.

The two substances – both clear liquids – were placed in separate dishes on a sterile table in the delivery room, the Herald has learned, and were mixed up as a consequence of being unlabelled. Other hospitals insist drugs are drawn by the anaesthetist directly from their original vial or ampoule into a syringe.

… the practice of drawing medications from stainless steel dishes was routine a generation ago. ”It was identified as being an undesirable and unsafe practice.”

The antiseptic infused into Ms Wang’s spine, chlorhexidine, has increasingly been used in the past five years in NSW because it mixes readily with alcohol, which accelerates drying and the epidural catheter can be inserted sooner.

The chlorhexidine wrongly injected into Ms Wang, who has suffered severe pain and can no longer walk, is understood to have been mixed with alcohol.

… The shift to chlorhexidine has been controversial, and a senior anaesthetist told the Herald betadine – the yellow iodine-based antiseptic which is easily distinguishable from clear epidural drugs – was probably safer …

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Homebirth Service at Casey Hospital

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Hospital-based homebirth services are sometimes criticised for being too restrictive in terms of inclusion / exclusion criteria. Women considered unsuitable for hospital-based homebirth programs include women with high blood pressure, gestational diabetes, previous caesarean section, previous shoulder dystocia, previous postpartum haemorrhage, over 42 weeks, under 37 weeks, baby thought to be too big or too small, prolonged rupture of membranes and so on. Although these programs are considered to be too restrictive, “risking out” most women, I often remind myself that these policies are no more restrictive than the policies of countries such as the Netherlands, and as we know, the Netherlands has a 30% homebirth rate.

We’re at the cusp of a very exciting time in maternity services. For the very first time, midwives will be given medicare provider numbers and women will be able to claim medicare benefits for midwifery care. This opens up the option of homebirth to women by increasing their access to midwifery care. However, for whatever reason, homebirth is still seen by some as being something that only “hippy”, “alternative” or “crazy” people would do. My experience is that the women who birth at home are generally tertiary educated, in their mid- to late 30s, professionally employed (or business-owners) and defintely not crazy! I am a very strong advocate of homebirth and although I provide a private homebirth service, I support hospital-based services because they promote choices for women and provide a sense of legitimacy and acceptability of homebirth. Hopefully more women will a) know they they have an option to birth at home and b) take up that option. Homebirth truly is a most beautiful and amazing way to birth a baby.

Link

GIVING birth at home was a relaxing experience Sarah Quinn says.

The Hallam mother was the second to take part in Casey Hospital’s new home-birth pilot program …

The Southern Health 12-month initiative provides 50 mothers with free midwife-led pregnancy, home-birth and antenatal care in the hope its success will make it available through the public system.

Ms Quinn, 21, who gave birth to her second child Tennille at home on July 8, said the experience was much better than her first child’s hospital birth.

“I felt much calmer and completely in control of my own body,” Ms Quinn said.

“I was surrounded by people I love, including my other daughter. It was a wonderful experience.”

Professor Euan Wallace from Casey Hospital said many pregnant women considered “low-risk” preferred home births because it provided a more positive transition to motherhood.

“Many women feel that labouring and birthing in their own home gives them a stronger sense of control,” Prof Wallace said.

He said studies had found home-birth was as safe in low-risk women as giving birth in a hospital but provided more satisfaction …

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Toxic epidural ravages mother

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

A very sad story. This family is desperate to hear from anyone who might have experienced anything similar so that they can be guided with treatment.

Link

ALEXANDER Zheng’s cot is still unassembled in a Sydney apartment where he has never been.

Home, for now, is a bassinet wedged into a room in the high-dependency unit of St George Hospital, where the two-month-old’s mother lies catastrophically injured.

Grace Wang’s spinal canal was injected with a powerful antiseptic instead of anaesthetic, in what should have been a routine epidural to ease the pain of her first child’s birth.

The devastating medical mistake – inconceivable in its magnitude – has poisoned her nervous system, leaving the 32-year-old distressed, confused, in shocking pain and unable to walk or even sit.

She has lost the strength to hold Alex, and rarely asks about her baby, as she did constantly after his birth.

The future may not bring relief, as Ms Wang’s physical and psychological condition has deteriorated since the accident on June 26, and new symptoms continue to emerge.

In the first three relatively hopeful weeks, her husband, Jason Zheng, cooked for Ms Wang and fed and changed Alex, who has apparently not suffered from the drug error.

Now Ms Wang has had surgery to relieve fluid pressure on her brain, and Mr Zheng maintains a vigil beside his increasingly frightened and disoriented wife, leaving little time for his son. The longed-for baby – who followed three miscarriages – is cared for by a nurse the hospital provides. The couple have no family in Sydney, where they migrated from China.

”It’s like we are ignoring that we have a son,” said the distraught father, who will begin legal action.

… Alex snuggles close when placed alongside his mother, but breastfeeding has been impossible for fear the many medicines she is taking may affect the milk.

”Every day she’s suffering and she says she wants to give up,” Mr Zheng said. ”She was crying last night when she touched her son. I just want to change my body to hers.”

Another thing Mr Zheng wants, and which motivated his decision to speak publicly, is to make contact with anyone who has suffered similarly, in the hope their doctors may advise on Ms Wang’s treatment.

Epidural administration of chlorhexidine – used to clean skin before injections and strong enough to neutralise resistant hospital bacteria – is so rare that Ms Wang’s doctors have identified only one other case.

Angelique Sutcliffe, from Britain, was paralysed for life after the chemical entered her epidural in 2001. But this was just a droplet – a fraction of the eight millilitres infused into Ms Wang.

Managers at St George Hospital yesterday admitted error and pledged to support the family, but would not explain the possible source of such a fundamental mistake in a commonplace procedure: nearly 40,000 epidurals were conducted in 2006, the most recent New South Wales statistics show, in 43 per cent of all births.

The state’s Minister for Health, Carmel Tebbutt, said: ”This is an extremely distressing case and I offer my sincere apologies.”

She said investigations had been ordered.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Planning a home birth? Sorry, but you’re just selfish and reckless: A mother-of-three’s deeply provocative view

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

Home, as we all know, is where the heart is. It’s where we eat, sleep and raise our families.

Home is the perfect environment for many things, but there’s one thing it’s definitely not right for – and that’s giving birth. For that, there are things called ‘hospitals’ and they are full of lovely people called ‘doctors’.

This week there has been a brouhaha, caused by an article written by Cathy Warwick, the general secretary of the Royal College of Midwives. She … is enraged by a report … [that] indicates that home deliveries can double, or even treble, the risk of a baby dying during childbirth.

Now I don’t know about you, but even the teeniest increase in the risk of death to my unborn child, or to myself, would be more than enough to get me into my car and down the local maternity hospital the second labour started.

We’re talking about the life of two people here – and, by association, the lives of everyone they know – and I value that ever so slightly above the need for comforting personal effects and my favourite CD on the stereo.

And to me, anyone who doesn’t is being not only very foolhardy, but also incredibly selfish. As well as having written three books on parenting, I have given birth three times, and never considered having my baby on the Ikea rug in my living room, even though as a young, healthy, fit woman – I had my first child at 23, and the other two at 25 and 28 – I was in a very low risk category and could easily have opted for a home birth.

But thank goodness I didn’t, because two of my ‘low risk’ labours ended up being more complicated than anyone had predicted. It was lucky I was in a hospital with immediate medical care available, or my babies could have been in real trouble.

‘Where motherhood is concerned, exercising our “right” to have things exactly the way we want is potentially damaging’
The reason for this is very simple: childbirth is not an exact science. It’s not predictable or controllable.

It is a natural, biological process, and like many biological processes, it can outsmart even the best human planner.

… becoming a parent should be the most selfless thing we ever do … It’s the moment we grow as people by giving part of our lives to someone else; the moment we put our child’s needs and wants before our own.

And it’s for that reason that so many women choose to birth at home, where they believe their child will be safer than in a clinical and impersonal hospital setting where they, and their babies, will be handled by strangers.

Not always, of course – it’s vital for mothers to maintain a sense of self, to keep meeting their needs and to teach their children that they are not the most important things in the universe.

I wish more overindulging parents would try this. But where childbirth is concerned, I firmly believe we need to put our self-centred wishes aside, and be in the safest possible place just in case things go unexpectedly wrong.

The best available research supports homebirth as the safer option for low risk women who are attended by a midwife. The study quoted was not the best available research: it was a meta analysis of studies: some good, some bad. the largest study on homebirth supports the safety of it for healthy women, attended by a midwife.

And the word ‘unexpectedly’ is key. All pregnant women are encouraged by their midwife to make a birth plan. Ha! I can tell you now that my first birth plan certainly didn’t include being in labour for 37 hours and having my daughter sucked out by ventouse delivery.

Neither did I plan for my son’s heart rate to slow down to almost zero for long enough that the midwife made an emergency call and got the consultant to run to the delivery room to burst my waters to relieve the pressure around the baby. No, I did not.

Birth plans are not about planning every aspec of a birth; they represent a woman’s intentions for birth, all being well.

Childbirth is unpredictable and therefore inherently risky. We are told it’s a woman’s right to choose where to give birth, and in a way it is. But this isn’t like choosing where to have a facial – it’s deciding where you think your baby, and you, will have the best chance of surviving if things go wrong.

Hmm. What about choosing the best place for birthing, all being well, and moving to an appropriate place if all is not well? Most of the things that go wrong in a labour go wrong with plenty of warning. We don’t all live in a hospital despite the fact that life is risky.

And that ‘if’ is very important . Think about it. The language used in this debate is highly emotive and significant.

Those in favour of home birth speak of it as being a ‘ positive’ choice. Of the journey into hospital being ‘unpleasant’. Of hospitals being ‘uncomfortable’ …

Now, I dislike strip lighting, the clinical smell and not being able to drink a cup of tea out of my favourite mug as much as the next woman trying to get a human out of her body.

But these discomforts seem shamefully insignificant compared with the importance of having a safe, healthy delivery – even if the risk is tiny.

… And I only have to look to all the doctors I know who have chosen to give birth in hospital to know it’s the safest place to be. The other selfish aspect of a home birth is that it requires a fully-trained midwife to leave the hospital and give one woman her undivided attention for the duration of her labour, which can be 24 hours or even much longer.

That’s assuming it’s a hospital-employed, which often it’s not. Often, a woman engages a private midwife to provide her care from pregnancy right through to 6 weeks after the baby is born. And doesn’t every woman deserve one-to-one midwifery care in labour? It’s safest for mother and baby, afterall. And isn’t that the author’s concern?

Websites supporting home births, including the National Childbirth Trust, strongly encourage women to ‘stand your ground’ if a local authority declines a request for a home birth.

There is no mention of all the other women in hospital who might need the midwife’s care during that time. Thought is given only to the right of the woman to choose to give birth wherever she likes.

Thankfully, in the UK, women do have the right to birth at home. This right actually increases safery because no woman has to freebirth owing to the inability to find a midwife to support her homebirth. It’s a mature approach that respects a woman’s right to determine what happens to her body.

How far should we take these rights? Personally, I would much prefer to have all my dental treatment at home, because I think it would be more relaxing and make the procedure less stressful and there wouldn’t be that dentist smell – should I be provided with a dentist who will come to my home and give me a filling? No, I should not.

What if being relaxed and feeling “at home” contributed to a safer outcome for the baby?

It is also, obviously, the case that many home births go perfectly well and many hospital births don’t. It’s not an exact science. What we need is the best of both worlds – for hospitals to provide far better care for women in labour, so that we have the best medical care available immediately, and a comforting environment.

And hospitals (and hospital policies) that are more accepting of homebirth woman and homebirth midwives, hospitals that will “allow” women to give birth to their babies how they see fit: breech waterbirth, VBAC without continuous monitoring, twins without an epidural and so on. When hospital policies are more encouraging, more women will feel comfortable to birth there. How often does a hospital say to a woman, “What would you like to do?” rather than, “we’ll allow you to …”?

For me, the potential benefits of delivering in my kitchen don’t remotely outweigh the risks. I am thankful every day for the care that was on hand within minutes when my babies needed it.

Most women don’t birth in their kitchens. Bedrooms, loungerooms, bathrooms, but not usually a kitchen. Somehow it doesn’t have that cozy feel to it.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

New unit a ‘home birth in hospital’

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

MONA Vale Hospital’s new birthing unit will simply be a place for expectant mothers to have a home birth inside a hospital – but a long way from emergency care if a complication occurs – according to an obstetrician.

How anyone can consider a hospital birth to be the same as a homebirth is way beyond me! There is a very big difference between the comfort and familiarity of our homes, and a hospital environment.

Dr David Jollow, one of Mona Vale Hospital’s onsite obstetricians, said the new, midwife-run, Mona Vale birthing unit would mean women who suffer a complication during labour will have to be rushed to Manly Hospital instead of being treated by Mona Vale’s onsite obstetricians.

“The new unit is essentially a home birth that happens to be in a hospital,” Dr Jollow said.

“It would actually be safer to have a home birth in Balgowlah or Seaforth, because an ambulance ride to Manly would be quicker.”

It’s interesting that obstetricians oppose free-standing birth centres, yet we have the existence of midwife-run units where obstetricians are not available. Is ther a differnence? Is it merely a differing terminology to be acceptable to some?

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Woman reportedly pregnant for nearly two years

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Unbelievable!

Link

Chien’s husband, Duong Van Tuan .. .claimed that his wife has been pregnant for 21 months. He explained that his wife saw doctors the first time when she was over three months pregnant.

Doctors examined her and made an ultrasound scan, saying the child was a boy and very healthy. They calculated that she would give birth in early September 2009.

The woman had no labor pain on the days that doctors anticipated … doctors examined her again and told the family they must wait because Chien has not begun labor yet. The placenta clung to the womb, so they couldn’t perform an operation, which could cause hemorrhaging.

For two months afterwards, Chien still have no sign of labor pain though she still felt the child move. When she was 11 months pregnant, the couple went to the Central Obstetrics Hospital in Hanoi and doctors still said that they must wait.

“I have been waiting for my wife’s labor for nearly one year. But I can’t wait anymore because the fetus is 21 months old already. Doctors at the Central Obstetrics Hospital made an appointment for us on August 20 to decide on an operation …

Dr. Tran Danh Cuong, chief of the Central Obstetrics Hospital’s Obstetrics 1 Ward, said this is a very weird case. He stated that no child can live for over 45 weeks in the womb. “No doctor should let a woman be pregnant for 21 months,” Cuong confirmed.

Correction: some babies can live beyond 45 weeks. It is unheard of in today’s times because most babies are induced even before 42 weeks (which is still considered normal pregnancy). In our grandparent’s generation and prior, some babies did indeed remain inside until well beyond 42 weeks and survive.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Good or Bad Idea? iPhone App Allows OBs to Monitor Patients Remotely

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

A very funny article, I had to share it!

Link

AirStrip OB was developed to improve the speed and quality of communication in healthcare … ineffective communication is a leading cause of medical errors leading to patient injury and noting that “preventable healthcare related errors cost the U.S. economy $17 to $29 billion each year.” The application sends “critical patient information” to a doctor or nurse’s (midwives not mentioned) smart phone, laptop or desktop, which gives “obstetricians remote access to live views of delivery room data — including fetal heart tracings, contraction patterns, vital statistics and nursing notes.” …

Offered as a success story on the AirStrip OB corporate website is an article in the St. Petersburg Times in which a physician at Community Hospital, which has a 37.7% cesarean rate, was able to see 30 patients in the office while “keep[ing] tabs” on a patient whose induction began at 5 a.m. that day. The doctor “saw a slight fluctuation in [the baby]’s heartbeat that told him the baby wouldn’t be able to withstand a long labor.” He performed a cesarean on the woman at about 1 p.m. and ushered a “healthy 8 pound, 14 ounce girl” into the world.

The page of testimonials features cheers from physicians, one of whom says, ‘At least with AirStrip OB, I can minimize unnecessary trips to the hospital.” Another raves, “But the greatest aid of all is that I can check the strip in real time when a nurse calls and reports concerns…I just open up AirStrip OB on my iPhone, review the strip and discuss the situation with the nurse…Medicolegally, I expect that this ability will not only benefit the obstetrician, but the hospital as well.”

… One of the misunderstandings that many patients have about giving birth in a hospital is that a doctor will be right there, ready to perform a crash cesarean section or operative delivery at the drop of a hat if their baby is experiencing severe fetal distress. But keeping these resources available around the clock is extremely costly … Even in hospitals that do have 24/7 surgical and anesthesia coverage, if they are performing another cesarean, the surgical suite and necessary staff may not be immediately available when an urgent complication develops.

The following guest post was submitted by Amity Reed in reaction to reading about the distancing “benefits” of the AirStrip OB application in an article:

Have you ever been laboring hard in the hospital — attached to all the various wires and machines; surrounded by equipment, instruments and alarms — and thought: how can we upgrade this birth from merely medicalized to hardcore hi-tech? Well, your prayers have been answered, ladies! The latest in baby removal technology allows your OB to take in a movie across town and simultaneously manage your birth. Soon, doctors may not even have to step foot in hospitals in order to do their jobs. This is the wave of the future: taking people out of the care equation altogether!

Yes, my friends, you too can now have major decisions about your maternal care made by any doctor with the latest smartphone application. Called ‘AirStrip OB’, this app delivers (ha!) real-time information about a woman’s labor so that busy doctors can make judgment calls about women they’ve not witnessed in labor (or even met!) from the comfort of their home. No more worries about wasting a highly-educated obstetrician’s time with your piddling requests for mobility, sustenance or support; the AirStrip OB app reduces the embarrassing tendency of patients to ask questions or expect personable care. ‘Emergency’ cesareans can now be ordered and performed before your OB’s sedan has been sufficiently warmed and gone through the Starbucks drive-thru. Technology is amazing, isn’t it? As those of us in the baby removal business like to say: “If you’re not in the room, cut open that womb!”

With this cutting-edge (ha!) technology, it’s never been easier to imagine c-section rates approaching 50 or even 60%. Soon, the use of vaginas for delivering babies will be obsolete altogether, leaving women with fresh, modern ‘love tunnels’ free from the wear and tear of childbirth. No more expensive vaginal rejuvenation surgery or labia lifts! Our technology, with its resulting seven-fold decrease in normal births, maximizes your chance of avoiding dangerous and unsightly vaginal birth.

But, wait, that’s not all! A recent survey found that 85% of the births portrayed on television and in films left fathers-to-be feeling disgusted, terrified and excluded. Everyone knows childbirth is pretty heinous and yucky, am I right? With the AirStrip OB app, you give your partner the gift of feeling secure in his masculinity, allowing him to renew his claim on your vagina. Why have a ghastly ‘husband stitch’ on your perineum when you can have a simple ‘husband staple’ on your tummy? Nothing says ‘I love you’ like abdominal surgery!

We hope all pregnant women come to know and love the AirStrip OB application, as all good mothers should. You don’t want to be one of those mothers who takes her chances for selfish reasons and ends up with a dead baby, now do you?

Look for another of our exciting apps coming soon, in which a Blackberry-controlled robot does all of your prenatal care. His hands might be a little cold but it sure does help your OB get to her dinner table on time! After all, isn’t that what we all want?

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Too Many C-Sections: Docs Rethink Induced Labor

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

The rise in cesarean-section deliveries in recent years has been characterized by some as a key indication of the overmedicalization of childbirth. While the procedure undoubtedly saves lives and leads to better health outcomes for mothers and infants who face problems during pregnancy and labor, many experts say the procedure is being performed too often, and in many cases for nonmedical reasons, putting healthy women and babies at undue risk of complications of major surgery.

The rate of C-sections has reached more than 31% in the U.S., a historical high …

The rate of caesareans is the same in Australia. Our Government is making moves to cut this rate.

The reasons for the increase are many and have been widely discussed: the rising rate of multiple births, more obesity in pregnant women, the older age of women giving birth. In fact, C-sections have become so common that many women may have an inflated sense of safety about them. “For the most part, moms and babies go through the process healthy and come out healthy, so maybe there’s this sense that we’re invincible,” …

But C-section carries all the attendant risks of major surgery; and data show that compared with vaginal birth, cesarean delivery increases the odds that a mother will end up back in the hospital after birth with complications …

Now obstetrics experts are actively seeking ways to drive down the number of C-sections … the ACOG issued new guidelines recommending that hospitals allow most mothers who desire vaginal birth after cesarean … to attempt a trial of labor, including … mothers who are carrying twins or have had two prior C-sections. Despite studies showing VBAC to be safe for most women — ACOG data suggests that 60% to 80% of women who attempt VBAC will succeed — many hospitals have urged women to undergo a repeat cesarean over the past decade, largely to avoid medical risks and malpractice suits.

Another factor contributing to high C-section rates is the increase in induced labor, especially between 37 weeks and 38 weeks … The use of labor induction in the U.S. has risen from less than 10% of deliveries to more than 22%, between 1990 and 2006 … research suggests that induced labor results in C-sections more often than natural labor … those whose labor was induced were twice as likely to have a C-section delivery as those who experienced spontaneous labor.

… previous studies had come to the same conclusion. In her study of … mothers delivering before 41 weeks’ gestation … 44% of women had their labor induced.

… after 41 weeks’ gestation, at which point it is standard policy to induce labor, it may lower the risk of medical complications for mother and baby — including the risk of stillbirth — and even decrease the likelihood of C-section delivery, but those same effects are not seen in women who induce labor before the 41-week mark.

… Among the women whose labor was induced in Ehrenthal’s study, nearly 40% of cases were categorized as elective. In other words, there was no pressing medical indication for induction. Extrapolating from the study findings, Ehrenthal suggests reducing the use of elective labor induction could lower the national C-section rate by as much as 20%.

Several hospitals have already begun reducing medically unnecessary induction as a way to lower the rate of cesareans …

… under the new policy the overall induction rate dropped 33% and the rate of elective inductions fell by roughly the same amount … the total number of C-sections among first-time mothers who underwent elective induction dropped 60% …

If a relatively simple policy shift based on medical evidence can successfully cut the rate of induced labor and C-sections at a single hospital, experts say similar changes applied broadly may help lower the rate of C-sections on a national level.

But as with the new guidelines regarding VBACs, decisions about labor induction and other issues surrounding childbirth must be shared by women. Patients should be informed and included in the decisionmaking process, Ehrenthal says. “Unlike the decision to do an emergency C-section where there’s no time to talk, usually there is time to have a discussion about induction,” she says.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Mums speak out about maternity shake-up

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

LOCAL women have expressed grave concerns about the standard of maternity services on the northern beaches, claiming a doctor-free birthing unit at Mona Vale Hospital is a risk to their health.

With the Health Department and midwives’ groups angrily denying the changes would jeopardie the health of women and their babies, The Manly Daily yesterday spoke to the most important people in the debate – new and expecting mums.

Amee Harland said she would wait for the Mona Vale maternity ward to reopen in full before having a second child there.

“I had a 24-hour labour and then they had to call the doctor because the baby’s heart rate was falling and he was there in five minutes and had to use a surgical vacuum,” she said.

… “You wouldn’t want to drive to Manly (or St Leonards) in the middle of labour …

“I would prefer to go to Mona Vale – it is my home town. Why would I want to go anywhere else? They were so good there.”

Mother-of-three Kellie Finney said low-risk births could also require immediate action.

“If there’s an emergency, the time it takes to get to another hospital would be pretty risky for babies in distress,” she said.

Luckily, research is showing that low risk maternity units are a safe option for women and babies, just as homebirth is a safe option for low risk women and babies. Several low-risk maternity units are in operation: Belmont, Wyong, Ryde just to name a few. The provide a fantastic solution to the issue of maintaining local birthing services.

“I don’t know how long exactly it takes for the baby to stop breathing or have serious medical problems.”

Thankfully, midwives can make such assessements. Transfer policies in place would ensure that women and babies who were at risk would be transferred to an appropriate facility in a timely manner.

“After the baby is born, what happens if the mother is bleeding out of control?’‘

The midwife would administer medications to stop the bleeding, insert a drip and start IV fluids, insert a urinary catheter to drain urine and supervise transfer. It is very rare for a woman to “bleed out of control” and most bleeds are controlled with medications to stop the bleeding.

… if a doctor was needed during the birth, such as to deliver the baby by caesarean, use certain medical instruments or administer an epidural injection, women will be transferred to Manly Hospital or Royal North Shore 45 minutes away.

And the problem is … ?

While mothers at the Mona Vale playgroup praised the role of midwives and welcomed the return of some maternity services to Mona Vale, they said they would not give birth without a doctor present.

You can’t please everyone! The majority of midwifery-led units are over-subsctibed with many women wanting to birth there where they’re assured a known midwife and maximum chances of a natural birth. No-one is being forced to birth at Mona Vale; women who prefer to go to manly or RNSH would be able to go there.

Most mothers said a doctor was called in during their previous births, despite some being in a low-risk category.

That might be a larger reflection on the rates of intervention in obstetric-led births rather than on actual need in a natural labour. Let’s not forget, high risk births would not take place at Mona Vale: no-one with diabetes, high blood pressure, premature, over 42 weeks, bleeding, broken waters for more than a certain period of time, anyone needing an induction or caesarean, twins, breech, anyone planning an epidural and so on.

… Catherine Kane, who is expecting her second child, said she is “not low risk enough’’ to give birth at Mona Vale.
“I wouldn’t be allowed to go to Mona Vale although I’m not high risk, I’m not low risk enough either.’‘

Andrea Whitlock, from Terrey Hills, said she would expect the maternity unit where she gave birth to have a doctor on hand.
“I had a natural delivery but if I didn’t have a doctor there I wouldn’t have been able to do it,’’ she said.

Hmm. I think you did do it! No-one else birthed your baby.

… The model will first be tested at Manly Hospital in October and is scheduled to begin at Mona Vale in December.

The Mona Vale maternity unit will also be reduced from 720 births to just 200 a year, with mothers only able to stay four hours after birth …

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Real Risks of Obstetrician Malpractice

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

Obstetrician malpractice poses grave risks to two parties, both the mother and unborn child, unlike many other malpractice claims involving only a single patient. Most obstetrician claims of malpractice revolve around a failure of the obstetrician to diagnose complications in a pregnancy or to take action to address signs to complications or distress, or in the second most common claim, an obstetrician provides or allows a pregnant woman to take certain prescription drugs that ultimately harm an unborn child. Per industry estimates, slightly more than five out of every one thousand live births result in birth injuries. Of this number, an even smaller percentage ultimately results in medical malpractice claims. Should a birth injury or complication have been preventable, the parents of a child are afforded legal rights to recover damages for injuries sustained by both mother and child.

Common Causes of Obstetrician Malpractice Claims

In order to determine whether a given obstetrician committed malpractice during the treatment of a mother or child, victims must determine whether a given obstetrician was negligent in their care of the mother or child. The determination of negligence is made by carefully evaluating a given obstetrician’s actions in comparison with the appropriate professional standard of care. Some of the most commonly cited causes of action in obstetrician malpractice claims include:

•Failure to assess or respond to complications during pregnancy or delivery, which can include any failure to diagnose a mother or infant’s condition properly, failure to administer appropriate reactive or preventative treatment options, or a hybrid of both. In any case, the determination of negligence is made based on the standard of care applicable to a specific patient in the exact same situation.
•Improper use of medical devices or other equipment … which may include negligent use of forceps, vacuum, or c-section surgical errors.
•Prescription drug errors … In order to be held liable, an obstetrician must have been negligent in prescribing these medications to a pregnant woman, per the standard of care.

Damages Applicable to Obstetrician Malpractice
The real risk of obstetrician malpractice lies in the precarious nature of infants before and immediately following birth. Any number of complications, injuries, or other problems during the birth process can ultimately cause medical problems and other damages to the infant for the remainder of their life. For parents, the burden of caring for an injured child, as well as their losses sustained as the result of childbirth injuries, are also long-term considerations. The damages applicable to obstetrician malpractice claims must account for the potentially permanent nature of certain damages to infants …

An American article, but relevant to Australia too, and relevant to midwifery as well as obstetrics. Full disclosure, an open and honest relationship and women’s involvement in all decisions being made might reduce the number of claims, except in circumstances where money must be recovered to provide for care of an injured woman or baby. A better approach would be a system that supports people who are harmed as a consequence of medical / midwifery care without the family needing to pursue legal action. It is unfortunate that sometimes harm is suffered, even when there was no breach in the care provided to the woman / baby. All interventions carry risks and pregnancy / birth are not risk-free events. Sometimes things don’t go to plan, not for any wrong-doing, but because life events carry some risks. Rather than families needing to sue to obtain funds to care for a baby or woman who has been harmed, it would be better for the health system to provide for these families in the same way that CTP and Worker’s Compensation does. Of course, if the health professional has acted inappropriately, the registration boards can be enlisted to provide guidance.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

New VBAC Guidelines Give Women More Decision-Making Power, Editorial States

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

The title’s enough to cause concern! Women always have decision-making power over their own bodies.

Although it is “understandable” that some health care providers are “cautious” about vaginal births after caesarean sections, it “should hardly be a controversial notion” that a woman who has had a c-section “should have a say in whether to try a vaginal birth during her next delivery,” …

… one-third of U.S. hospitals and 50% of physicians refuse to allow women to attempt VBACs “due to a fear of lawsuits over uterine ruptures,” which occur in 0.7% to 0.9% of cases … “Extremely small as that risk may be, even tiny numbers represent real women and real babies who can suffer serious consequences in a delivery gone bad,” …

Sydney has the same situation, with some smaller hospitals not allowing VBACs owing to lack of 24/7 theatre facilities.

However, “when up to 80% of women who are ‘allowed’ to attempt VBAC succeed, it’s not so easy to understand why all women aren’t ‘allowed’ to weigh the risks and to make their own choices regarding their own childbirth experiences,” … The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ” recently eased its guidelines to say that hospitals offering women trial labors after caesareans should have a surgical team ‘readily available’ instead of ‘immediately available,’” …

“It’s a small change, but one that might send the precipitously declining VBAC rates headed in the right direction again,” the editorial argues, concluding, “Let these new guidelines be the impetus for giving women the information they need to weigh the risks and to be able to choose a trial labor or a repeat caesarean themselves”

Given the risks of repeat caesareans, particularly for women who have multiple caesareans, VBAC ought to be encouraged for most women. We also need to focus on woman-friendly care in pregnancy and labour; care that affirms the woman’s belief in her ability to birth her baby and care that is sensitive and individualised.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Doctor-midwife tensions run deep

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

Last week, midwives and clients of Andaluz Waterbirth Center in Portland announced plans to file a federal lawsuit to “cease intimidation and threats against midwives” by the Oregon Health Licensing Agency and Oregon Health & Science University.

Midwives say doctors and nurses at OHSU have filed baseless complaints to the licensing agency meant to thwart competition … The threatened lawsuit spurred a passionate online debate among supporters and critics of home birth.

Conflicts between midwives and doctors run deep. One of the biggest problems: Many physicians deal with midwives only when a laboring mother experiences difficulties during a home birth and requires transport to a hospital, sometime urgently.

“It’s an extremely tension-fraught encounter,” according to Melissa Cheyney, an Oregon State University assistant professor and practicing midwife who studied the interactions of midwives and doctors in Jackson County last year. Nearly every physician interviewed by Cheyney and her graduate student expressed the view that births must take place in a hospital to be “safe.”

Studies including higher-risk pregnancies have found that fetal deaths are more likely in home births. But in low-risk pregnancies, most research shows no significant difference in risk to the baby, while home-birth mothers experience fewer complications. In a study in British Columbia last year, women giving birth at home suffered fewer than half as many serious perineal tears, and about a third less postpartum bleeding.

By choosing a hospital birth, women substantially increase the risk of having a surgical delivery. More than 29 percent of hospital births in Oregon resulted in a cesarean during the years 2006-2008. Less than 4 percent of home births ended with a cesarean in a 2005 study of 5,400 births attended by midwives in the U.S. and Canada.

Women who choose home birth often cite the desire to keep birth free of medical intervention. Heather Hermans … transferred to the care of a midwife because she wanted to try a vaginal delivery rather than schedule a cesarean section, as her obstetrician-gynecologist recommended.

“My ob-gyn didn’t remember me from appointment to appointment,” Hermans said. “I was treated like pregnant cow No. 45.”

Many women will choose midwifery care to receive personalised care where they can develop a relationship with the midwife who will attend their birth.

Hermans experienced complications during labor and took an ambulance to OHSU, where a surgeon delivered her healthy baby boy by emergency C-section. The surgeon filed a complaint about Hermans’ midwife to the state … Roy Haber, an attorney hired by the midwives, said the Oregon Health Licensing Agency withdrew all six investigations after he challenged them.

Conflicts aren’t inevitable. Cheyney is working with midwives in Lane County and a Eugene obstetrician, Dr. Paul Qualtere-Burcher, on guidelines for smoother, more collaborative relations. Qualtere-Burcher and his colleagues have agreed to help midwives get access to laboratory testing and ultrasound screening for their clients. Midwives are referring higher-risk home birth clients to the physicians for assessment and another perspective.

“We’d like them to come in and see us before it becomes a big issue during labor,” Qualtere-Burcher said. “I think it’s been very successful.”

Home birth by the numbers

Planned home births in Oregon last year: 877 out of 47,675 total births, or 1.8 percent.

Risk of baby dying in a midiwife-attended home birth: 1.7 percent versus 0.6 percent in hospitals, based on a 2009 British study including women with breech births, twins, or attempting a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean (VBAC).

I’d be interested to see what these stats are when high risk homebirths are removed from the data set, or to analyse the risk of each “risk factor” in isolation to determine the riskier “high risk” situations, for example, is HBAC less risky than twin homebirth?

Risk of baby dying in a midwife-attended home birth when comparing only low-risk mothers: 0.5 percent versus 0.3 percent in hospitals.

Chances of giving birth without medical intervention: 78 percent with a home-birth midwife versus 54 percent in hospitals, according to the 2009 British study.

A women’s chances of having cesarean section when giving birth in an Oregon hospital, 2006-2008: 29 percent.

Fetal deaths in births attended by licensed midwives in Oregon, 2001-2007: 4 in 2,906 births, about 0.1 percent.

Fetal deaths in births attended by physicians in Oregon, 2001-2007: 1,455 in 274,278 births, about 0.5 percent.

This would account for the fact that midwives mostly manage uncomplicated pregnancies and births, while doctors are referred higher risk women and babies.

Number of home birth midwives who are licensed in Oregon: 64, up from 54 in 2008.

Complaints lodged against licensed midwives, 1999-2007: 40.

Disciplinary actions imposed by the Board of Direct Entry Midwifery, 2000-2004: 12

Midwife guide

Direct Entry Midwife – A general term for practitioners who train directly into midwifery without a nursing or medical background, and attend births outside of hospitals. Oregon law allows direct entry midwives to practice with no licensure.

Certified Professional Midwife — Direct entry midwives certified by the North American Registry of Midwives, which requires written and practical examinations and practical experience attending 40 births.

Licensed Direct Entry Midwife — Direct entry midwives who obtain a license in Oregon are authorized to use some prescription drugs and medical devices. They must pass a national examination, demonstrate experience in attending births, and complete continuing education every three years. They are licensed by the Oregon Board Direct Entry Midwifery and subject to disciplinary actions if they violate professional standards.

Certified Nurse Midwife – Registered nurses who go on to complete an accredited nurse-midwifery program. Oregon requires certified nurse midwives to obtain a Masters degree. CNMs are the only midwives that practice in hospitals. They are licensed by the Oregon State Board of Nursing.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Home birth—proceed with caution

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

The increased demand to give birth outside hospital has increased the rate of home delivery. In the Netherlands, a third of women now have home births. In the UK, 3% of total births occur at home, while in the USA home delivery accounts for 1% of births or 25 000 deliveries per year.

In Australia, 0.6% babies are born at home. This rate has increased in past years.

Home birth rates have been increasing in the USA partly because of the increasing proportion of births by caesarean delivery … because doctors and hospitals opt not to do a vaginal birth after a caesarean to avoid liability lawsuits …

Although home birth seems to be safe for low-risk mothers and, when compared with hospital delivery, is associated with a shorter recovery time and fewer lacerations, post-partum haemorrhages, retained placentae and infections, the evidence is contradictory for outcomes of newborn babies delivered at home … The problem arises when planned home births become hospital births when complications arise, and this can then lead to an underestimation of the risk and overestimation of the benefit of home births. Data from the Netherlands, for example, suggest that up to 40% of nulliparous women who start labour at home are transferred to the hospital. Most studies also rely on different midwifery models for home delivery, which are not generalisable.

Professional organisations … have issued contradictory policy statements regarding home deliveries. The Department of Health of South Australia has a detailed policy for home birth among women with low-risk, singleton term pregnancies, while the UK’s Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of Midwives jointly support home birth in women with uncomplicated pregnancies. By contrast, ACOG does not support home birth, citing safety concerns and the lack of rigorous scientific evidence. Choosing to deliver a baby at home, states ACOG, is to show preference for the process of giving birth over the goal of having a healthy baby.

A recent meta-analysis … provides the strongest evidence so far that home birth can, after all, be harmful to newborn babies. The research incorporated 12 studies and 500 000 births from several industrialised nations … The data show that planned home births to healthy and low-risk mothers compared with planned hospital births in the same group of women doubled the risk of neonatal deaths (0·2% vs 0·09%). And when infants with congenital defects were excluded, the risk of neonatal mortality tripled. The main attributable factors for the increase in mortality were the occurrence of breathing difficulties and failed attempts at resuscitation—two factors associated with poor midwife training and a lack of access to hospital equipment. In the USA, for example, only a third of home births are accompanied by a certified midwife.

Analysing the outcomes of these studies, what we can learn from this meta-analysis is that homebirth is safe for low risk, healthy women, whereas high risk homebirth translates to mroe complications for mothers and babies.

Women have the right to choose how and where to give birth, but they do not have the right to put their baby at risk. There are competing interests that need to be weighed carefully. Hospital delivery should be the preferred method of delivery for high-risk pregnancies … Home delivery is an option for mothers with uncomplicated pregnancies, provided they are advised of the risks involved, have one-to-one midwife care (that includes good resuscitation skills and accreditation by a local regulatory body), and live in a location that allows quick access to obstetric care.

The situation in Australia is that fetuses do not have any rights until they’re born and breathing, therefore, the woman’s preferences are supported in pregnancy. An ethical stance would hold that the duty of care to the fetus increases as it reaches term.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Results show New Zealand women and their babies in good hands

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

New data has confirmed that newly qualified midwives are providing care that compares very well with the care provided by more experienced midwives.

The Midwifery and Maternity Providers Organisation (MMPO) figures show that women who gave birth under the care of a newly qualified midwife in 2008, had vaginal birth, breastfeeding, caesarean and postpartum haemorrhage rates comparable with those under the care of more experienced midwives.

These data cannot be used to support the safety of care by newly qualified midwives; rather, outcomes such as need for resuscitation, admission to special care / intensive care nurseries, mortality, morbidity etc need to be analysed.

… “New Zealand midwives receive intensive and extensive training and education … the equivalent of a four year degree … Student midwives are involved with more than 100 births as a minimum training requirement and are required to undertake (manage) 40 births of which 10 can be for women having forceps, ventouse or caesarean births and are also required to provide care for 40 women who are experiencing complications during pregnancy, birth or during the postnatal period.

… before they can be registered, midwifery students in NZ have to:

1. Successfully complete a Bachelor of Midwifery programme at one of the four accredited Midwifery Schools (attached to tertiary institutions/universities);
2. Have the required amount of practical experience by observing 25 births, undertaking 40 normal births on their own responsibility & being involved in a further 40 complicated pregnancies or births. This compares to the current obstetrician training requirement to attend 20 normal births.
3. Attain a pass mark of at least 70% for each theory and 100% for each clinical paper as part of the undergraduate degree
4. Pass the National Midwifery Examination set by the Midwifery Council; and
5. Satisfy the Midwifery Council that they are fit for registration as defined by the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Home birth risk report criticised

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

The Royal College of Midwives has rejected claims that women who opt for a home birth put their baby at risk.

According to a report in medical journal The Lancet, the risk of infant death can be up to three times higher in home births.

But midwives have hit back, saying the practice is generally very safe, and that childbirth is “not an illness”.

Cathy Warwick, general secretary of the RCM, claimed the Lancet article was “incomplete and flawed”.

The report was based on a study carried out in the US, … Europe and Australia.

Led by Dr Joseph Wax … the study found that for healthy women, giving birth at home instead of in hospital doubled the chances of the baby dying.

When infants with congenital defects were excluded from the study, the death rate tripled.

In the UK, 3 per cent of births take place at home – three times more than in the US but far fewer than in the Netherlands, where home births make up a third of the total.

The Lancet editorial said the US study, published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, provided “the strongest evidence so far that home birth can … be harmful to newborn babies”.

Ms Warwick said: “We are deeply disappointed and dismayed that The Lancet has published an editorial indicating that women would choose to harm their baby in favour of their own needs by choosing a home birth.

“The editorial also cites research that is incomplete and methodologically flawed. There is no evidence to suggest that hospital births are safer than home births.”

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448