Homebirth: the right choice, naturally

Link

WHEN Kate Randell and Chris Lockyer welcomed baby Mali, it happened in their comfortable family home.

The couple decided to have a homebirth because Ms Randell’s pregnancy was low-risk and, after nine years’ experience as a midwife, she knew she would feel more natural and relaxed in her own house.

… the couple were prepared with a homebirthing kit, including oxygen and advanced medical supplies, had a registered midwife on hand and were willing to go to hospital if there were any complications.

She said she would never have considered a home birth if she was having twins or the pregnancy was high-risk.

“With any high-risk pregnancy the best place is in a hospital, but with a low-risk, normal, healthy pregnancy and a labour where everything is going OK – it should be whatever the parents feel most comfortable with,” …

… “Most people don’t realise that all birth has risk and that babies die in hospital, too, not just at home,” …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

More Women Choosing To Have Their Babies At Home

Link

Despite a decrease in home births between 1990 and 2004, the number of home births actually increased between 2004 and 2009 by 29%, an upturn of 0.56% in 2004, to 0.72% in 2009. In 2009, a total of 29,650 home births were reported in the United States. This is the most home births reported since researchers began analyzing data on this topic in 1989 …

Benefits Of Home Births

More private, less chaotic
The woman is surrounded by the comforts of her own home
Fewer people involved
Lower chance of a C-section
Cheaper
More personal experience

Midwives Are Present At Most Home Births
62% of home births reported in 2009 occurred in the presence of midwives, while only 7% of hospital births had a midwife present. 19% of home births had a certified nurse present, and 43% of home births were supervised by other types of midwives, for example, direct-entry midwives or certified professional midwives. The study reports that a mere 5% of home births had taken place in the presence of doctors, probably because the majority of them occurred without notice. 92% of hospital births had doctors present.

33% of home births were supervised by someone other than a doctor or midwife. For example, family members may have helped …

Taking A Look Back
The way women choose to deliver their babies has drastically changed in the last 100 years:

In 1900, the majority of births took place outside of a hospital – very few women had their babies at a place other than their own homes.
During 1940, only 44% of women chose to have their babies at home
By 1969, 1% of women were having their babies at home. (These figures remained the same into the 1980s)

The move from homebirth to hospital birth occurred with no rigorous studies of either birth place. Recent research has now concluded that for a healthy, low-risk woman, a homebirth is no more dangerous to her or the baby, than a hospital birth. It is only when complications are added to the mix, that we start to see that home birth is less safe than hospital birth. Research is also conclusive that if we take a healthy, low-risk woman and assist her to birth at home, she will experience less intervention and more satisfaction with her birth experience, compared to birthing in hospital. Homebirths are making an evidence-based comeback!

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Before you have a baby … Expert Financial Planning Advice

Many families have asked me over the years about issues relating to budgeting for a family, and also about their options for such things as paid parental leave versus the Baby Bonus. I am delighted to have met Boris Glushankov who is a Financial Planner at In Advance Financial Management. Boris has a special interest in all issues relating to budgeting and financial planning for new families and couples who are considering having their first baby.

You often hear new parents say that having a baby is an amazing life-changing experience. Nothing is ever the same again! At a time when every aspect of your life is changing, the last thing you want to think about is money. It may not be always possible to reduce your financial commitments, but there are things you can do to plan and manage them more effectively.

“In Advance Financial Management” has created a unique “Before Having a Baby Essentials Package” to help with your changing financial needs.
We have brought together a group of professionals from different areas (Financial Planning, Mortgage consulting, Accounting and Legal Services) to offer you a complete solution for preparing your finances for the arrival of a new member in your family.
The base “Before Having a Baby Essentials Package” includes:
• Two(2) written budgets – one for your current circumstances and one for when the baby is born
• A review of your debts to maximise cash-flow when your baby is born
• A review of your Insurances, both inside and outside of superannuation.
In addition to the “Before Having a Baby Essentials Package” we can also offer you:
• A review of your mortgage to free up cash-flow and see if any other benefits can be attained
• Advice on maximising Centrelink benefits and help with related Centrelink forms
• Review of your new Estate Planning Needs including creation of a Will
• Accounting service
Please see attached document for further explanation of each service and pricing.

If you decide to purchase or vary an AMP product, your financial planner, AMFP Financial Planning Limited and other companies within the AMP group will receive fees and other benefits, which will be a percentage of the premium you pay or the advice fee you agreed with us. You can ask us for more details about this.
This is general information only. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before relying on the information, please consider the appropriateness of the information in light of your personal circumstances. No AMP company or AMP financial planner receives any payment for the general advice in this flyer.

In Advance Financial Management Pty Ltd
Shop 83, BKK Eastlakes Shopping Centre,
19 Evans Ave, Eastlakes, NSW, 2018
(02) 8970 0531
email: [email protected]
web: www.inadvance.com.au

In Advance Financial Management Pty Ltd, ABN 83 149 130 405, is an Authorised Representative of AMP Financial Planning Pty Limited.

Antenatal depression

There’s a lot that is said and written about postnatal depression, that is, depression after a baby is born, but not a lot is said or written about antenatal depression.

Some women will experience anxiety and depression in the months leading up to the birth of their baby, and this can stem from many areas.

Financial concerns, concerns about relationship changes, fearful of how motherhood might change your life, relationship or job, changes in lifestyle, and so on can all create the perfect environment for antenatal depression to arise. It is thought that as many as 10% of women will experience antenatal depression. Of course, this is only the number of women who are actually diagnosed, and many more will go undiagnosed.

Most care providers will screen women for signs of depression in pregnancy with a simple questionnaire that can even be self-administered. This enables midwives and obstetricians to intervene in the pregnancy so that the woman feels more supported and less depressed. This approach also helps reduce the incidence of postnatal depression. It’s known that women who are depressed in pregnancy often experience postnatal depression.

If you have antenatal depression, you might experience:
fatigue
mood swings
irritability
difficulty concentrating
difficulty falling asleep, or waking early
loss of appetite

Some women are more susceptible to depression, perhaps having a history of depression even before pregnancy. A general lack of support is also a trigger for depression in pregnancy.

The trouble with leaving antenatal depression undiagnosed is that it often matures into postnatal depression, but often in a worse form that what was experienced in pregnancy, and this can be harmful for the woman, her baby and family.

If you are feeling depressed in your pregnancy, the best thing would be to speak with your midwife or obstetrician about how you are feeling. They can refer you to a specialised program for pregnant women, or refer you privately to a psychologist.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What are the best positions for labour?

The best positions for labour and birth will be the positions that are the most comfortable for the woman. These are usually also the positions that will assist the baby into a good position to be born.

The positions you decide to use will have an effect on your sense of control and how you experience your labour. Generally, women who are able to move around as they need to, will expefince labour more positively and as being less painful, than women who are confined to the bed.

There are many positions that women will naturally adopt in labour, such as:
- Standing
- Leaning over a bench or couch
- All fours positions
- Kneeling positions
- Walking
- Lying on your side

Because gravity helps the baby’s head to descend deeply into the pelvis, upright positions are generally better for aiding progress in labour while also reducing pain. This is because upright positions work with the body in labour, rather than against it.

Many women choose to birth in the water because the sensation of being in water combined with the lack of gravity makes them feel more mobile and able to position in the best way possible to help the baby move through the pelvis.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Natural Twin Birth

I had a difficult delivery with my first baby, including posterior presentation, premature rupture of membranes, meconium staining, stalled labour, 18 hours of Syntocinon, a largely ineffectual epidural, a 4 hour second stage, and forceps delivery. My daughter had severe respiratory distress and was in the NICU for several days. It was a very tough introduction to parenthood and left me quite traumatised, especially the separation from my daughter. My husband and I decided that we would try for a homebirth if we had another baby, in the hope that a calmer environment would assist the birth process. When I fell pregnant again, we found a lovely homebirth midwife.

I started to show really early. At 8 weeks I was in maternity wear. I thought it was just because it was a second pregnancy, but a 9 week ultrasound showed TWO BABIES. We were completely shocked as there are no twins in my family. Twins of course meant that a homebirth was out of the question.

There followed many long months of argument with various obstetricians about our birth choices. We wanted as little intervention as possible. A standard twin delivery involves syntocinon (which I was very afraid of, after the previous experience), continuous monitoring (which I had hated with my first birth, as I felt chained to the bed) and an epidural prior to the second stage, in case positioning/version or a c-section is necessary to deliver the second twin. In my first birth, the epidural meant I had no pushing urge and seriously compromised my ability to deliver my daughter, hence the very prolonged second stage, so I did not want an epidural this time around, although I was prepared for Synto to be administered between the twins if labour did not re-establish. The hospital also wanted both twins delivered on the bed, which I did not agree with as I had found pushing in that position impossible the first time around. Our views were very challenging to the obstetricians and some were quite aggressive about it, although I must say the head OB was more reasonable and was prepared to admit that my refusal to consent to an epidural would be a “complete contraindication” to giving me one! Throughout this stage our midwife was a pillar of strength and information. She gave us the courage of our convictions and more than once came to the hospital to talk with the obstetricians on our behalf. Even so, the hospital was very unhappy with our birth preferences. It was a stressful time, helped somewhat by a Calmbirth ® course.

In the end all our arguments ended up being moot. At 33 weeks, I started to feel an ominous itching all over. Tests showed elevated bile salts and poor liver function results. I had obstetric cholestasis. Our midwife and the hospital agreed: the babies would need to be delivered by 37 weeks. And I knew that that early, an induction would almost certainly involve Syntocinon.

This was really difficult for me to accept. I was terribly afraid of the drug, and knew that Synto would mean continuous monitoring and therefore limit my movement, which I also feared. However, I knew that my fear would make the delivery more difficult and the pain worse. At this point the hospital dropped the bombshell that despite all their delivery rooms having deep birthing baths, I would not be allowed to use those or the shower if I had to have Synto, as they believe this risks pump damage to the Synto pump. Essentially this meant I was walking into a labour that was likely to be more painful, with less pain relief options. It was going to be down to Calmbirth ® alone, if I wanted to avoid drugs (and I did!).

I did a lot of Calmbirth ® practice from then on. But the Calmbirth ® visualisation exercises presupposed a normal delivery without intervention, and I found it very upsetting to listen to them. I hit on the idea of doing my own visualisations, of a medicalised induction process. After a few of these I was able to work through some of my fears.

On the day of the induction, we kissed our daughter goodbye at 5am and met our midwife at the hospital. Preliminary checks showed a Bishop score of 5, very promising for 36 weeks. The hospital midwife applied prostaglandin gel and sent us out to freedom. We had a lovely breakfast. I started to have sporadic contractions but nothing serious. We returned to the hospital 6 hours later. My cervix had ripened to 2cm, and the very cheerful OB was able to break the waters for twin 1 (our second daughter) at 3.45pm. No meconium staining! I dared to ask the OB how she was presenting. ANTERIOR, WOOHOO! I was very pleased with that.

Contractions came rather more strongly after that point, but were still sporadic. The felt very “knifey”, and our midwife explained this was from the prostaglandin gel. We held off on the Synto as long as possible, but at 6.25pm the drip was put up and contractions started in earnest. Continuous monitoring was in place, but via telemetry so I could have moved. Ironically, though, I didn’t feel the need to. I went deep into calm breathing and spent most of the labour sitting beside the bed on a fit ball, sometimes circling my hips but more often just breathing to ride the contractions with my husband stroking my back. Unlike my first labour, I had no real idea of when the next contraction was coming, and ended up doing my calm breathing (in for 4, out for 6) solidly for hours. I wasn’t afraid of the contractions. I could really feel them doing their work, and little twin 1 moving firm and fast down. I was determined to “get out of the way” of labour and with each contraction focused on opening up and not clenching against the pain. Our midwife was convinced things were going quickly and asked us when we thought we would be having the babies. I told her anything before midnight was a sucker bet! She said 11pm.

At 8.30pm, about 2 hours after I started having regular contractions, the pain was starting to get BIG. The OB did a cervix check – I was 5cm. I was very disheartened by this, but our midwife told me that the first 5cm was the hardest, and the very encouraging OB tried to convince me that it wasn’t all about centimetres and that my cervix felt promisingly thin and stretchy. In hindsight, even in my first labour I dilated from 5 to 10cm in under an hour, so I should have known what was coming – but I didn’t!

Throughout this time I was not making any noise. The hospital’s midwife didn’t seem to think I was in established labour, and threatened to up the Synto dose to make the contractions “strong and regular”, even though they were already sufficient to dilate my cervix 3cm in under 2 hours. I managed to insist “no. more. Synto!” She reserved judgement, but it might have been the adrenaline kick I needed, as by 9.15pm I was having enormous contractions every 2-3 minutes. I could feel them as a giant swelling band of pain stretching around my whole belly and stretching lower. At this point I started vocalising “ah, ah, ah” throughout contractions, to help me ride the pain and stop me clenching down. I remember saying “if this isn’t transition, I’m in trouble!” I didn’t believe it could be transition, though – not so early, not when my first birth had taken almost 3 days. Our midwife said she thought we would have babies by 10pm, and I didn’t believe her.

I needed to get off the fit ball and change position, and asked if I could get on all fours, although the idea of moving seemed impossible to imagine. The hospital midwife set up a crash mat and a nice beanbag for me to lean on. I leaned forward and within one contraction of moving had started making some amazing noises. Unlike my “ah ah ahs” they were completely involuntary. And then I could feel twin 1 crowning. I did not believe it had happened so quickly, and cried out “what’s happening?” Everyone still makes fun of me for this. She was born in only a couple of pushes at 9.25pm, and our midwife had to tell the hospital midwife to put her gloves on to catch her. Our beautiful daughter, with a lovely round head, pink skin and a great big yell! There is a photo of me still on all fours, with a blissed-out grin. I could not believe how easy and quick it had been. I got to hold her straight away, but contractions started up again quite quickly, and she went to her daddy for some skin to skin time.

At this point the obstetricians arrived – a registrar and resident. I wanted to stay on the floor, but the registrar managed to persuade me up on the bed to check twin 2′s position, as we knew he was breech. Contractions started up again within minutes and were really agonising now, as I had lost my Calmbirth focus and as the position (twin 2′s spine to mine) had that sort of posterior feeling to it. But within seconds I was again feeling the inexorable urge to push. The OB flicked twin 2′s feet out as he was in a squatting position, the midwife and OB flexed twin 2′s head by pushing on my stomach and with a few mighty pushes he was out too, at 9.39pm. Our son! He was handed to me but unlike J, had a bit of trouble breathing, and spent some time in the special care nursery. He was back to us almost before we knew it. I must say he had a very breech-looking head, which looked like a mighty frown, but he’s ever so handsome and cheerful now.

J weighed in at 2.98kg (I was really ticked off she could not stretch to the extra 20gm), and P weighed 3.06kg, excellent weights for 36 weekers, let alone twins!

After twin 2 was out, I lost all patience for the pain – rather a pity as the Synto kept getting ramped up to deliver the placentas and then to deal with my uterus which did not want to shrink back down. I ended up with a Synto drip all night. I tell people this birth was meant to help me deal with my fear of Synto once and for all.

Both babies had beautiful breastfeeds within an hour or two of birth, which sadly was not an omen of things to come for twin 1, but it was lovely.


Anyway, that was our birth. Twins born without any pain relief (not even hot water) or really any intervention other than the induction drugs, with 4 hours of contractions total and only about 2 of those active labour. It wasn’t the birth I had wanted but it was a wonderful experience and very healing after my first daughter’s birth. I am so proud of myself, and look back on the birth with amazed gratitude all the time.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Care during Labour and Birth

A recent study from QLD has surveyed 20,371 women who recently gave birth. Experiences of pregnancy, labour, birth and after birth care were assessed for the most recent birth, retrospectively four to five months after birth. The findings were very interesting! The only issues with the data and study is that mothers self-reported their answers and there was no verification of the information, or cross-checking with the midwives and obstetricians who provided the care. In other words, it was based on women’s subjective experiences rather than what might perhaps be factual or accurate. That being said, I wanted to draw a few points out of the study and elaborate more on them. The other aspect to raise is that I am making an inference when I write about this study: the study compared women who were cared for in public facilities (public hospital delivery suites and birth centres: women who for the most part would have had public care providers) with women who gave birth in private facilities. Those women would, for the most part, have booked with a private obstetrician and given birth under their care. So from this, I am inferring that public care = care from public hospital staff where the woman does not choose her care provider; and private facility care = private obstetric care.

Care during Labour and Birth
Most women received labour and birth care from a midwife, and saw an average of 2.3 different midwives during their labour and birth. This is an interesting fact to consider, as many women believe they will have only one midwife in labour. The reality, in a hospital (public or private) is that midwives work in shifts, and there are three shifts in a day. Private midwifery and to a lesser degree, caseload models, do not work so much on shifts (although with many caseload models, the midwives are on-call for 12 hours at a time, so it is possible that you will go through two shifts of midwives even if you are only in the birthing facility for say 6 hours). Private midwives work their time around your labour, rather than the timing of a shift.

Half of all women who birthed in public facilities had never met any of their labour and birth care providers before, and this was significantly less common among women who birthed in private facilities because their obstetrician would be present for the birth, representing a familiar face. This is also an interesting point to raise: many women believe their obstetrician will be there with them during labour, or at least in the birth unit. This is not the case for the most part. For the most part, your obstetrician will be in the operating theatre, in his/her private consulting rooms or sleeping (eg if you’re labouring at night) and s/he comes in only if there is a problem and of course for the birth. Therefore, although there is continuity of sorts (the obstetrician you booked with will attend the birth), your actual care (which may be several hours) would be with midwives you have not met before, who all work in shifts. In contrast, private midwifery care is delivered by the midwife you booked with. Your private midwife would be there with you for the duration of your labour.

The majority of women in the study wanted to have a vaginal birth. Among women who wanted a vaginal birth, women who birthed in public facilities were more likely to have a vaginal birth than women who birthed in private facilities. This might be a reflection of the choices that women make, or of the recommendations of the woman’s care provider. For the purposes of the study, the private setting would have equated to private obstetric care because private midwives cannot admit directly to a private hospital. The possibility that obstetricians are influencing a caesarean rate of almost 50% in private hospitals in QLD was quite alarming, because many obstetricians would like us to believe that the caesareans that are performed are dome so because the women ask for them or because they are genuinely needed.

The truth is that with a study such as this, we will never really know. The women were surveyed 4-5 months after the birth of their baby, not before the birth. Before the birth, they may well have asked for a caesarean, but afterwards experienced too much bleeding, wound infection, pain, complications, separation from their baby and breastfeeding issues and come to regret their decision to pursue an elective caesarean. In this case, some women might have named their care provider as the one who recommended the caesarean, rather than admitting to themselves that they chose it. That is one view.

Personally, I do believe that some obstetricians have influenced the almost 50% caesarean rate. I believe this because every day I meet women who have birthed with, or are about to birth with, a private obstetrician. They tell me that they are scheduled for a caesarean, not because they have chosen this, but because it has been recommended to them. Sometimes the intention of the “recommendation” is to assist with “informed decision making”. This is where things get a bit muddied. The woman comes away believing the caesarean has been recommended, whereas the obstetrician interprets it as providing information to the woman so that she can then make an informed decision, and then reports that the caesarean was the woman’s choice. In any event, there are ways of wording things to illicit a response or decision that favours our bias. Some are more skilled at this than others.

For example, if I told you:

Caesareans have been shown in some studies to be safer for the baby, and given that your last labour was quite long and difficult, resulting in a painful forceps delivery with an episiotomy, you might like to consider a caesarean this time. Your baby would be spared the use of forceps, so he may well feed better than your last baby, because he won’t have a headache. You are also less likely to experience any pelvic floor issues. Most likely, given that you had an episiotomy last time, I might have to perform one again. I would try not to do this, but sometimes it is necessary. I know how painful the recovery was for you last time, so a caesarean might be preferable. Yes, you would still have stitches either way, but it’s far more comfortable having stitches on your tummy than your perineum.

Given this “information”, would you choose a caesarean? Possibly as this care provider has given some good arguments (some factual and others not so factual) for a caesarean, and has used emotive and persuasive language that plays on this woman’s traumatic last birth.

Now consider a different conversation:

Caesareans have been shown in some studies to be more harmful for the baby in terms of breathing difficulties and the need to admit the baby to the nursery. This would mean that you would be separated from your baby, and I know that after your last experience, you want nothing more than to hold your baby when he is born. Given that your last labour was quite long and difficult, resulting in a painful forceps delivery with an episiotomy, we can talk through some ideas to try that will minimise the risk of tearing. I believe that an intact perineum (no stitches) is absolutely possible for you. Also, there are many courses – such as Calmbirth – that will help you to manage the sensations of labour, along with labouring in a deep, warm bath. You know, I wouldn’t be surprised if you find you don’t even think of having an epidural this time! I know you’re worried that your baby might have a sore head and be a difficult feeder if forceps are needed, as this is what happened last time, but I’d like tor reassure you that forceps are really unlikely. Your body has birthed before and it will remember what to do this time. It would be very unusual that forceps would be needed again. This is a different pregnancy, different baby, different place of birth and different care provider. We can work together to make this experience very different – and very healing – from last time.

Given this “information”, would you choose to try a natural birth? Possibly as this care provider has given some good arguments for a natural birth, and has used emotive and persuasive language that plays on this woman’s traumatic last birth.

So, that is how it comes to be that women go with the recommendations of their care providers, and all the while, the care provider believes that it is the woman’s decision, while the woman believes it’s the care provider’s recommendation. If you’re now feeling very confused and like you don’t know who to trust anymore, my word of advice would be to interview a few midwives and obstetricians and ask lots of questions of them, and then go with the care provider that feels right for you. Also ensure that their statistics (birth outcomes) are aligned with the sort of birth you are trying to achieve. Once you have done this, trust your care provider and follow their advice if their advice makes sense to you and feels right. If it doesn’t, speak up and let them know.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Satisfaction and support in birth

A recent study from QLD has surveyed 20,371 women who recently gave birth. Experiences of pregnancy, labour, birth and after birth care were assessed for the most recent birth, retrospectively four to five months after birth. The findings were very interesting! The only issues with the data and study is that mothers self-reported their answers and there was no verification of the information, or cross-checking with the midwives and obstetricians who provided the care. In other words, it was based on women’s subjective experiences rather than what might perhaps be factual or accurate. That being said, I wanted to draw a few points out of the study and elaborate more on them. The other aspect to raise is that I am making an inference when I write about this study: the study compared women who were cared for in public facilities (public hospital delivery suites and birth centres: women who for the most part would have had public care providers) with women who gave birth in private facilities. Those women would, for the most part, have booked with a private obstetrician and given birth under their care. So from this, I am inferring that public care = care from public hospital staff where the woman does not choose her care provider; and private facility care = private obstetric care.

Being cared for well during pregnancy

The study found that women who birthed in private facilities were significantly more likely to say they were cared for very well during pregnancy than women who birthed in public facilities.

This is not surprising as women birthing in private facilities would be cared for in pregnancy by one obstetrician who was chosen by them.

Women who birthed in private facilities were also significantly more likely to report being treated with respect, treated with kindness and understanding, and treated as an individual by their pregnancy care providers.

This too is not surprising as their care provider was chosen by them.

Women who birthed in private facilities were also significantly more likely to say their pregnancy care providers were open and honest, respected their privacy, respected their decisions, and genuinely cared about their well-being.

This is all good news for continuity of carer models in pregnancy. Continuity of carer is very different to continuity of care. Continuity of care means continuous care from a small group of people – or even a large organisation – who shares a similar philosophy. It is interesting to see how far (and wide) this definition is stretched. Some would have us believe that we can give birth at the largest and busiest tertiary hospital as a public patient and receive continuity of care even though we had 30 care providers and never saw the same person twice. This definition – continuity of care – would still hold even in the above situation because all of the hospital staff would be working to the same philosophy and policies. Hence, continuity.

Continuity of carer, on the other hand, means that care is provided by one person for the most part. This is what we generally see with private obstetric care and private midwifery care.

Women who birthed in private facilities were more likely to say they were cared for very well in labour and birth than women who birthed in public facilities. However, the study found marked variations between public birth facilities with birth centres and midwifery-led units having the highest proportion of women saying they were cared for very well during their labour and birth.

This is good news for all those women who book with a private midwife or a public hospital-based caseload model.

Women who birthed in a private facility were generally more satisfied with the support they received after the birth, although only about 50% women were satisfied. The public hospital care rated even more poorly than that! This is evidence that the delivery of postnatal care needs to shift to meet the needs of women and babies.

Generally, women are discharged home early after the birth of their baby, with lengths of stay generally being around 24 – 48 hours in a public hospital. Women are then visited by a midwife once or twice following discharge; some hospitals provide more visits than this. Women who book with a private midwife generally enjoy more postnatal visits: 7 to 14 on average, with each visit lasting about an hour. A s well as this, women are generally prepared thoroughly in pregnancy for breastfeeding and baby care so that it is not so scary when the baby arrives.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Labour induction methods compare favourably

Link

… a method of inducing labour that dates back to the 1930s “has been found to work as well as modern treatments but with fewer side effects”.

The news is based on a large Dutch trial that examined inducing labour using of a simple mechanical device, called a Foley catheter. Researchers tested the device against the use of hormone gels designed to trigger contractions. The study … found that both techniques led to similar rates of spontaneous vaginal deliveries, instrumental deliveries … and women requiring a caesarean section.

The Foley catheter also seemed to lead to fewer side effects in the women and their babies, although using the method of induction … led to longer labours …

Current guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend the use of hormone gels for induction of labour, but not the routine use of mechanical devices for induction … This new, relatively large trial has shown no important differences between the two methods used in these women. It is possible that the mechanical technique might find a place for women where there may be risks from using hormone gel …

… a high proportion of induced labours are performed because a woman’s cervix is not ready for the birth and does not open appropriately.

This randomised controlled trial compared two methods for inducing birth in women who had single babies and a reason to be induced. The women were either induced using mechanical means (a Foley catheter) or with application of a hormone gel into the vagina. A Foley catheter is a mechanical device that helps open the cervix. A fluid-filled balloon is inflated in the cervix, which stretches it until it is at an appropriate size to allow birth. The prostaglandin hormone gel mimics the natural mechanism by which a woman’s hormones cause the cervix to open.

The researchers say that hormonal induction has become the method of choice in several countries, but that use of the Foley catheter may result in similar numbers of successful inductions without the need for a caesarean section. They also say that the Foley catheter induction may have several advantages over hormone methods, such as not causing “over-stimulation” of the birthing processes …

… the caesarean section rates were much the same between the two groups: 23% of women who had been induced using a Foley catheter required a caesarean section compared to 20% of the women induced using the hormone gel … Likewise, a similar number of women in each group needed extra mechanical help with the birth, such as the use of forceps (11% in the Foley catheter group and 13% in the hormone gel group).

A greater number of women induced with the Foley catheter required a caesarean because they failed to progress in the first stage of birth (12%) than the hormone gel group (8%) … Similar proportions of each group had a caesarean section because their baby was becoming distressed (7% in the Foley catheter group compared to 9% in the hormone gel group).

… Fewer women in the prostaglandin hormone group (59%) needed an additional hormone called oxytocin to stimulate uterus contractions than in the Foley catheter group (86%). The time from the start of induction to birth was on average 29 hours (range 15-35 hours) in the Foley catheter group and 18 hours (range 12-33 hours) in the hormone gel group.

The groups did not differ in terms of painkillers taken, haemorrhage, overstimulation or health status of the baby. Fewer babies delivered with the Foley catheter (12%) needed to be admitted to the general ward (not an intensive care ward) than those induced using hormones (20%). More women treated with the hormone gel (3%) had suspected infections during birth compared to those induced with Foley catheter (1%) …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Choosing the best care provider for your needs

Choosing the best practitioner for your needs is a very important and personal decision. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong choice: some women will choose a private obstetrician, others will choose a private midwife and others will choose public hospital care. Some women will make an initial choice of care provider and decide to change care providers during the pregnancy. Other women will make one choice in their first pregnancy and then a different choice in a subsequent pregnancy. What’s important is to have an accurate understanding all the options available so that you can feel confident to choose the best option for your needs. The best people to talk to are the people who actually provide the service, rather than a GP who is removed from the actual services of an obstetrician / midwife / public hospital. Get referred to a private obstetrician or two; interview them; reflect on how you feel after meeting them. Go and visit your local public hospital. Have a tour and speak with the midwives there. And interview a couple of eligible midwives. You do not need a GP referral to see an eligible midwife and you can claim their services through medicare. An eligible midwife is a private midwife who has met an additional registration standard that enables them to have a Medicare provider number.

When you are considering a care provider, it’s also necessary to consider where you would like to give birth and to ensure that your care provider can attend you in your chosen setting. You might choose to birth your baby in a public hospital as a public or private patient, in a private hospital as a private patient, in a birth centre or at home. It can be helpful when trying to make a decision to write down a list of questions you may have and also consider what is important to you as you make your choices. For example:

What do I want from my care?
What type of practitioner would I feel most comfortable with?
What do I need from my practitioner to feel comfortable and safe?
Do I want public or private care?
Is continuity of care important to me?

These are questions only you can answer. Other questions are for your care providers to answer with you, and it’s a good idea to interview a few care providers – midwives and obstetricians – before making a choice. Midwives and obstetricians will charge a fee for interviews and you are able to claim this through Medicare (your midwife will need to be eligible in order for you to claim a Medicare benefit). It is important during the interview that you ask all the questions that are on your mind, and to be aware of how you feel throughout the interview. Your care provider should inspire you with confidence, help you to feel at ease and comfortable, and the appointment should feel unhurried.

Likewise, your care provider may like to “interview” you, and this is so that your care provider can be sure that s/he can meet your needs. Maternity care is provided in a partnership and so it’s important that both parties feel really comfortable with the other.

There are many questions you might wish to ask your care provider; the best suggestion is to consider what is important to you and write a list of questions.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Medicare-funded midwifery care: What you need to know

I am an eligible midwife. This means that my private patients can claim some of the cost of private midwifery care, much the same way we do when we see a GP. As well as Medicare benefits, some private health funds will provide benefits for childbirth education with a midwife, and costs may also be claimed through tax as a medical expense (more on that one from your Accountant). Medicare benefits and tax benefits combined are between $2,500 and $3,300. This means that care with an eligible midwife will be up to $3,300 cheaper than care with a non-eligible private midwife.

What is a Medicare-Eligible Midwife?

In order to claim Medicare benefits from care with your midwife, you will need to ensure that your midwife is eligible. An eligible midwife meets certain advanced requirements of a registration standard:

  • Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
  • Midwifery experience that constitutes the equivalent of 3 years full time post initial registration as a midwife;
  • Current competence to provide pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care to women and babies;
  • Successful completion of an approved professional practice review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
  • 40 hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care (20 hours in addition to standard requirements);
  • Pregnancy care:

    45-60 minute consultations in your home or in my clinic

  • Childbirth education
  • Continuity of carer
  • Medicare benefits
  • Obstetric back-up
  • Birth in hospital – or at home

    Continue your care with the same midwife you know and trust, with specialist obstetric back-up readily available

    Postnatal care

  • Consultations in your home and / or my rooms
  • Medicare benefits
  • Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Doctors driving the increase in caesareans

    Link

    THE popular belief that caesareans are on the rise because women are too posh to push is incorrect, a new study shows.

    University of Queensland researchers surveyed 22,000 Queensland mums …

    … 48 per cent of women in private hospitals who had a caesarean did so on the recommendation of their [obstetrician].

    Just under 40 per cent of women in public hospitals said the same.

    … only 10 per cent said they had wanted to have their baby born that way.

    “… the majority of women would prefer to have a vaginal birth,” …

    “The increase in caesareans seems to be largely driven by the recommendations of doctors.”

    … some women are going into the procedure underprepared.

    Only 52 per cent of women … reported making an informed decision to have a planned caesarean …

    Interesting research that backs up what midwives have known for a long time: the main driver for increased caesarean rates is not the mother’s choice to deliver by caesarean, but rather the recommendation of her obstetrician, who in most cases will be recommending a caesarean for non-essential reasons. I say this with confidence because upwards of 45% women do not “need” to deliver by caesarean for the sake of their babies or themselves. No-one could be justified in believing that caesarean rates this high are necessary in the majority of women who experience a healthy pregnancy. Private midwifery caesarean rates are well under 10%, with many private midwives having caesarean rates of around 5%.

    The lesson is that a woman’s choice of care provider has the greatest impact on her mode of birth.

    It is more important that her health issues, her choices and preferences for care, her previous birth experiences and her geographical location.

    A woman’s choice of care provider will literally determine whether she undergoes a (possible unnecessary) caesarean or a natural birth. Late pregnancy and labour are not the times to be asking your care provider if their recommendations (for induction or caesarean) are truly necessary: women are simply too vulnerable in that state to make informed decision, and besides, informed decisions take take to research to come to an “informed” decision. When time is of the essence – in late pregnancy and labour – informed decision making almost goes out the window. Ultimately, the best strategy is to interview your potential care providers and peruse their statistics on birth. They say they support natural birth … but what are their stats on natural birth? What % of their patients have a caesarean, induction, epidural? If your care provider is vague and non-committal, that should speak volumes. If their rates are high and you are aiming for a low-intervention birth, it is not too late to identify this and seek a care provider whose philosophy – and outcomes – are more aligned to what you are hoping to achieve.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    I’m pregnant and I have private health insurance. What are my options?

    Great question! There are a few options available to you as a private patient, as well as all of the options that are available to public patients. The private options are either a private midwife, or a private obstetrician.

    Private midwife
    To receive care from a private midwife and obtain Medicare benefits, your midwife will need to be an “eligible midwife” (meet an additional registration standard) and work with an obstetrician or a doctor who provides obstetric services. Some private midwives are able to provide labour and birth care in hospital settings, while others are only able to provide labour and birth care at home. All private midwives can provide pregnancy and postnatal care. Hospital options may include private or public hospitals; it’s best to ask your midwife which hospitals she attends births at. Eligible midwives provide complete continuity of care: the midwife you book with will be the same midwife who provides all of your pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Private obstetrician
    Private obstetricians provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care, although birth care would also be provided by hospital midwives who may be unknown to you until birth. Private obstetricians deliver babies at public and private hospitals. Continuity is provided during the pregnancy, but birth care is mostly provided by hospital midwives. Postnatal care is almost always provided by hospital midwives, with your obstetrician visiting you each day in hospital and at 6 weeks.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Scheduled C-Sections: Interfering with Nature?

    Link

    … I had really easy pregnancies … By the end of each pregnancy, I was ready to do just about anything to get those babies out of me, but I never wanted a C-section … I never even read the C-section chapters in all my pregnancy books. Why would I? I always knew I wanted to deliver my babies naturally, as in no drugs or medical interventions at all.

    I went to my OB for a regular checkup on my due date for my first baby and was told that I was measuring small and needed an ultrasound. I felt fine, no contractions, cramping or anything at all, really. Baby was moving around and I felt fine. Back in the doctor’s office I was told that my amniotic fluid was a little low and they were going to “get me delivered today.” Huh? Um, ok. I guess we’re having a baby today! Yay!

    I was hooked up to monitors and Pitocin and within 5 minutes … doctors and nurses descended on me … It took them 11 minutes to find [the heartbeat] … they were prepping me for a C-section. I was terrified. Why did I need a C-section? They said they thought my baby wouldn’t tolerate labor. What does that mean?

    I was taken to a surgical suite, strapped to a table, IVs in each arm, numbed from the chest down, catheterized, bright lights in my eyes, a curtain hung between my face and my belly. My husband was brought in just before they made the incision. No pain. No sensation at all. Then the “tugging” of my body being stretched apart and a tiny, perfect, healthy baby being pulled out. I couldn’t see her being born with the curtain between me and the doctors and I couldn’t see her when they took her across the room so the pediatricians could check her over. Once she was delivered, I was given “something to relax me” that nearly knocked me out. They brought my swaddled daughter over to me and placed her on my chest, but I couldn’t touch her since my arms were strapped to the table. Then they took her off to the nursery. The doctors chatted with each other about their upcoming travel plans whilst they sewed and taped me back together. Then I was bandaged, dressed and taken to recovery.

    About an hour later, they brought my baby to me, but I couldn’t sit up and I was shaking so violently from the drugs that I was afraid I would drop her if I tried to hold her. I managed to nurse her throughout the night … My baby was healthy and perfect but I felt like I had surgery and someone gave me a baby. Not like I had given birth. I expected birth to be difficult and intense and sweaty and painful and amazing, but instead it was cold and surgical and terrifying and left me feeling completely disconnected from how my child came into the world.

    Two years later, I was pregnant again. I called my OB (who was on maternity leave herself) and she told me there was no reason I couldn’t have a natural birth. That was all I needed to hear. I found a midwife and learned everything I could about giving birth after a C-section. I learned that each medical intervention can lead to the need for more and as long as the baby is not in distress, labor should proceed on its own … After 25 hours of unmedicated labor, attended by my husband … and the midwife, I gave birth to another perfect, healthy baby girl. Two years later, I did it again. That time it only took two hours to deliver a 9lb baby boy.

    … Speaking from experience, a C-section is much more difficult than a natural birth. After I delivered my second and third babies, I felt completely fine. Better than ever, actually. After the C-section, I couldn’t hold my baby, couldn’t sit up or go to the bathroom without assistance, and I couldn’t laugh or sneeze without feeling like all my insides would burst out of my incision. In some cases, a C-section can be a lifesaving procedure, but it is in no way an easy alternative to giving birth.

    Tasha Schlake Festel
    I can definitely understand the appeal of a scheduled C-section. We’re all busy, juggling jobs, other kids, and countless glamorous social obligations, so penciling in “have the baby” at a time convenient for all totally makes sense. In fact, it is one of the only things you, as a mother of a newborn, will be able to control for the next 25 years.

    But there’s no way I’d do it. I’ll have my babies the old fashioned way. Well, the old fashioned way plus drugs, that is.

    … While a C-section is a fine and respectable choice, I was adamant about not wanting to have my children surgically removed from my body … the history of mammalian life on earth has proven that mother’s bodies are built to birth babies without surgical intervention … Third of all, with everything else so planned and premeditated, it’s kind of romantic to have that one thing – the most important thing in the world, the birth of your child – to be unexpected.

    I had the vision of waking up in the middle of the night, rolling over to my husband, nudging him gently and saying, “Honey, it’s time.” And then we’d hug, giggle, and bolt out of bed, grabbing our pre-packed and coordinated suitcases. My husband would fumble with the keys, act all cute and nervous, and run out to start the car. He’d drive off without me, only to turn around immediately, usher me in to the car and oh, how we’d laugh!

    Shockingly, it didn’t work out like that – or anything close to it … I was induced … with both of my pregnancies … due to relatively minor complications …

    Pitocin’s best friend is named Epidural. With my daughter, I tried just hanging out with Pitocin, but found it to be a violent companion. Epidural was a lovely counter. After overcoming my “irrational” fear of having a needle stuck into my spine to numb the bottom half of my body, I thoroughly enjoyed the experience of childbirth. Several hours of painless contractions and 12 minutes of physical labor later, my daughter arrived and all was well.

    Fast forward two years and five days, and I found myself hanging out with Pitocin and Epidural again. This time, I expected Pitocin to be a moody bitch, so I opted that we not hang out alone. The thing is, drugs or not, at the end of the experience you get a baby. You don’t get extra credit for doing it without pain medication. There is no trophy, no reward, no prize. It’s a baby. And you can either be exhausted from pain and effort, or just be exhausted from effort. I went with Option B.

    Or at least I meant to. Here is some important advice. Do not let your labor and delivery nurse tell you that what you are feeling is “pressure” when you know damn well that it is pain. Stick to your guns. Demand more medication. Having round 2 of the pain killer kick in just in time for the delivery of the placenta is a few minutes too late, no matter how “good looking” your doctor tells you said placenta is. Of course, pain is a great motivator, so after two hearty pushes, unwavering determination and ample swearing, I was happy to hold my little boy.

    I found out the hard way that I am not really “made” for a second dose of pain killer, as did the other new parents who were admiring their newborns when I threw up all over myself and the carpet in front of the nursery window … Oops! But thankfully, I didn’t feel the delivery of that placenta. That would have sucked.

    The point of pregnancy is to have a baby when you’re done with it. However that happens is a personal choice. I can’t imagine ever choosing to schedule surgery to accomplish this goal, but I don’t judge those who do. It’s a decision that should be made thoughtfully with your partner and your OB. Realize that your best-laid plans will likely not be followed, but get used to it. That’s life as a mom.

    Holly DeSouza
    As much as I love being a mom, I hated being pregnant.

    … I had a difficult pregnancy filled with first and third trimester bed rest, frequent fainting spells, constant morning sickness, two episodes of the flu (!!!), three threatened miscarriages, and weekly trips to MGH and Melrose Wakefield Hospital due to some freak occurrence where I could not feel the baby moving and could only see her when she was really kicking me. The silver lining to all of the hospital trips was my husband and I knew really early on the sex of our baby.

    At 20 weeks, I felt I already endured enough and wanted an end date where I was guaranteed I would meet my daughter. I asked to schedule a C-section. When I was denied, I started begging and whining and pleading my case of hardship. My ob-gyn was steadfast and would not schedule a C-section. I tried every trick any formerly pregnant woman gave me so I could have the “luxury” of a C-section. My ob-gyn kept telling me to hang in there and, if I carried full term, we could discuss it …

    At the end of the day, turns out my doctor was not a dummy after all in not agreeing to an elective C-section for me. What women without a gaggle of nannies tend to discount is how busy you will be after the baby comes, how much longer the recovery time generally is after a C-section, and how greatly your priorities will shift once the baby is out of the womb. If you do not need a C-section for medical reasons, there should not be an option to have a C-section. I never looked ahead myself at both sides of the coin. All I wanted was a promise I could have a pain-free delivery. Picking her birth date was an added bonus. After a difficult pregnancy with a lot of down time, I am so thankful I did not have an elective C-section because I was up and running and enjoying my daughter as soon as she was delivered to my world.

    Laurie Hunt
    Well, if I truly had my way I would request the stork bring my children. Especially the first one …

    It happened too quickly … and the epidural did not work. You have not lived until you have experienced back labor without drugs. Trust me. The second time was a much better experience because I literally ran to the hospital at the first hint I might be in labor and asked them to meet me in the parking lot with the epidural. The drugs worked this second time around and while labor took longer it was a much better experience.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Pregnancy Symptoms

    I am often asked by women what they might expect to experience in early pregnancy. Here’s a guide below:

    The symptoms below are some of the more common symptoms that women experience. It’s always best that women contact their eligible midwife or GP early in pregnancy to arrange for a pregnancy test and a dating scan if needed. Eligible midwives are able to order all of the necessary tests and scans and no referral is needed.

    Late period
    This is a common sign of pregnancy, and it is the one that it most often found first.

    Morning sickness
    Some women experience this, while other women do not. Some experience it as a later sign of pregnancy.

    Sore, tingly breasts
    This can also be one of the earlier signs of pregnancy and it can feel similar to premenstrual breast tenderness.

    Tiredness
    Tiredness is a common pregnancy symptom in early pregnancy.

    Changed tastes or strange tastes and off-putting smells
    Some women will have a strange taste in their mouth, like / dislike food that was previously disliked / liked, and may be put off by smells that were previously quite ok.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    First-time mums learn the hard way: informed mums choose private midwives

    A recent article has suggested that first-time mums have overly unrealistic ideas about their birth – that it will be a natural, uncomplicated birth, when in reality it is not, for the majority. We know that women choosing care through the general hospital system will experience high rates of interventions, leading ultimately to a caesarean. But few women know that if they engage a private midwife for a hospital or homebirth, they will experience much lower rates of intervention, but with the same level of safety. Care with an eligible private midwife will attract medicare benefits, and obstetric care is readily available if it is needed. The article below described one woman’s experience of general hospital care. I can only assume that this reporter has written the article in response to the outcry about the original research.

    HERVEY Bay first-time mum Jasmine Adame has experienced first-hand just how difficult childbirth can be.

    And she agrees with new research … that suggests that many first-time mums are unprepared for the realities of a complicated labour.

    Jasmine delivered her little girl … at Hervey Bay Hospital after spending a day and a half in labour.

    In the end, she was told her labour had stalled and she had to have an emergency caesarean.

    We are not told how long labour stalled for, whether she had her own midwife with her throughout her labour (unlikely since this is not available to most women through the general hospital system) and we are also not told how far through her labour she was. It is true that some caesareans are performed for “failure to progress” when the woman’s cervix is less than 3 centimeters dilated, indicating that she is not yet in established labour.

    Jasmine had attended antenatal classes prior to having her first child and said it was the midwives who held these classes who gave her the best idea of what labour was actually going to be like.

    Hospital classes are great at telling women about hospital policies, but independent childbirth education will inspire women with confidence about what their bodies are capable of, with the right support.

    “I knew it wasn’t going to be fun.

    “But I didn’t expect it to be as horrid as it was,” she said.

    It sounds like she didn’t have the care of a midwife who was known and trusted. Most women I work with will experience their labour extremely positively, as if it was the best (hardest and most challenging, but oh so rewarding) experience of their life.

    … The chances of having a medically uncomplicated birth were actually 21%.

    This applies to women birthing in the general hospital system, where they will not be cared for by one midwife who is known to them, chosen by them and trusted by them. The chance of a medically uncomplicated birth when a woman chooses private midwifery care is around 70% – 80%. This is a huge difference.

    Because she had been focused on a natural delivery, the decision to deliver the baby by caesarean took Jasmine by surprise – and the time between the decision and the birth was very swift, allowing her little time to adjust …

    This is addressed during care with a private midwife, where there is ample time to explore all options and possibilities, so that there are few surprises on the day (or night!). Hour-long appointments allow plenty of time for questions and education. The possibility of a first-time mum “needing” a caesarean in the general hospital system is 25%, or one in four. Given this large minority, we would think that all women going through the hospital system would be thoroughly appraised of this possibility. In my private practice, a mere 3% first-time mums need a caesarean. This is not because we push the boundaries of safety: it is because women who are well supported, well-informed, relaxed and confident about their birth will generally start labour on their own at term, labour normally and birth their babies unassisted by any instruments or operations.

    Hopefully Jasmine will choose private midwifery care with her next pregnancy (private midwifery care is available for a planned hospital birth), where she can expect an 80% – 90% chance of a vaginal birth following her caesarean in her first pregnancy. Or will she choose to go back to the general hospital system, where she has a mere 15% chance of a vaginal birth?

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Chinese medicine could double chances of conceiving child

    Link

    Couples with fertility problems are twice as likely to conceive using traditional Chinese medicine as compared to western drugs …

    The researchers at Adelaide University, Australia, reviewed eight clinical trials, 13 other studies and case reports comparing the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with western drugs or IVF treatment.

    The review … included 1,851 women with infertility problems, and the clinical trials alone found a 3.5 rise in pregnancies over a four-month period among women using TCM compared with western medicine.

    … 50 percent of women having TCM got pregnant compared with 30 percent of those receiving IVF treatment.

    … “Our meta-analysis suggests traditional Chinese herbal medicine to be more effective in the treatment of female infertility – achieving on average a 60 percent pregnancy rate over four months compared with 30 percent achieved with standard western drug treatment,” …

    According to the study, the difference appeared to be due to the careful analysis of the menstrual cycle, the period when it is possible for a woman to conceive, by TCM practitioners …

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage

    Link

    No previous study has focused on true physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Physiological third stage is often chosen by women who birth at home or in a birth centre, however hospital policies urge active management of the third stage (injection of syntocinon, immediate clamping and cutting of the cord and then pulling the placenta out) because studies have shown that this form of management reduces bleeding. However, it is unfortunate that those studies have either a) not clearly defined physiological management or b) have not managed the “physiological” third stages in a physiological manner. Hence, those studies have shown that active management is the safer option and hospitals have gone with those recommendations.

    This study clearly defines what is meant by physiological management and also the women who are suitable for physiological management. Some women are at a higher risk of PPH and so active management was recommended to those women in the study.

    The study compared active management which was standard at the tertiary hospital, with physiological management which was the norm at the free-standing birth centre. At the tertiary unit, 11.2% low-risk women experienced a PPH. At the midwifery-led unit, where physiological management was practiced, PPH only occurred in 2.8% women. Active management was associated with 11.5% PPHs compared with physiological management which was 1.7% PPHs. Active management was associated with a seven to eight fold increase in PPH for low-risk women.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Mums turn to Twitter for pregnancy tips

    Link

    MUMS-TO-BE might soon turn to Facebook and Twitter for the latest medical support, if a health study involving pregnant northern women proves successful.

    The two-year study … will gauge how social networking can encourage healthy pregnancies.

    The University of Adelaide project will survey what forms of social media have the most influence over mums-to-be.

    It will then develop new ways to communicate health advice to them via Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and text messages.

    This could include anything from reminding them to take medication or attend appointments, to encouraging them to avoid smoking and drinking alcohol.

    … the study would help provide correct lifestyle and dietary information to pregnant women.

    … Dr Michael Wilmore hoped the study would lead to healthier babies …

    It’s sad that women are being encouraged away from their care providers and towards non-relationship-based care when we know the benefits of continuity of carer. The best outcome is where a woman feels comfortable to ask her midwife or obstetrician all of her questions and feel supported in her care.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Do first-time mothers have unrealistic views about having uncomplicated births, or does the health system fail them?

    An interesting report in The Telegraph states that first-time mums have unrealistic expectations of drug-free, natural, uncomplicated births, when in reality, they have a mere 21% chance of:

    • a labour that starts on its own (ie, is not induced)
    • not using an epidural
    • birthing without the use of instruments or operations

    If we exclude from that figure the proportion of women who also birth without stitches, that figure becomes a mere 8%. The papers would like us to believe that

    first-time mothers have unrealistic views about having uncomplicated births, increasing the risk of post-natal depression

    In other words, postnatal depression is caused by womens’ unmet and unrealistic expectations of an uncomplicated birth.

    This suggests that the health system has no part to play in this. It is merely a case of women wanting too much from their experience. If we expect too much, we set ourselves up for disappointment, and this leads to postnatal depression!

    Wow!

    The article goes on to say that

    expectant mothers … believe there is a 56.2 per cent chance of an uncomplicated birth, which means a baby being born without the use of forceps, suction cups, caesarean section or induced labour.

    Whereas

    the chance of having a medically uncomplicated birth is 21 per cent.

    A further 30.7 per cent said they believed women would have uncomplicated births without needing sutures. The actual figure is 8 per cent.

    My readers will well know that I don’t subscribe to the view that a crappy birth experience and postnatal depression is all the fault of the health service; but at the same time, it’s not all the fault of the woman either.

    We’re each responsible for the choices we make and for informing ourselves of all available options before we make a choice. Health services are also responsible for accurately representing their services and outcomes so that women can make a considered choice. If women have a mere 8% chance of birthing normally and without stitches, that needs to be well-known so that women may seek other care options if they so choose.

    The health system is here to provide a basic and safe level of care. If we expect or desire more than what can be considered “basic”, then we do need to look into other options, and these will generally be found in the private system, be it private midwifery care or private obstetric care (although I dare say that the average private obstetrician will have lower rates of normal birth than a public service).

    All of that said, it seems appalling that 79% first-time Mums go through the public system and come out the other side with an intervened-with birth. In my private practice, those figures are reversed. Do women know what they are signing up for when the choose their local hospital for care? And perhaps more importantly, should the hospitals be held to account for these poor outcomes, or at least acknowledge that they are failing women?

    Most first-time mums should expect to birth without intervention. Most should not need any intervention. The birthing process is a normal, natural, female bodily function. We don’t question the potential for our bodies to ovulate, urinate, digest food, menstruate, circulate blood, metabolise substances and so on. These processes generally “work”; birth generally “works” too. Provided we, as care providers, don’t mess it up with unnecessary interventions and an environment that is not conducive to labouring and birthing a baby.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Do deceptive medical birth procedures de-humanize women?

    Link

    It was a rainy Wednesday late afternoon when pregnant Ana Cristina realized it was time to get ‘to know’ her unborn son João. She went to the Maternity Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros in hopes of an easy delivery. Despite the pain and restlessness, Ana stood quietly for four hours waiting for care. “It’s a scandal that they treat you badly,” she said. After waiting so many hours … Ana was informed that there were no vacancies and she should find another place to have her son.

    … They would have make it across São Paulo city to go to another facility, the … famous teaching hospital in Santa Casa renowned in Brazil for its quality of health care …

    … Many women face the happiness of their baby’s arrival with a fear of dying, along with the desire to care for their child and also to be cared for by their medical team. They have confidence in the hospital as the safest place to have a child. But they also carry the suspicion that their delivery can be abused by impunity and deceptive medical ethics by some medical teams.

    Some women OB/GYN patients hear humiliating phrases from their medical providers during the process of childbirth, such as:

    “Aren’t you too old to be having a baby?”
    “If you don’t shut your mouth…”
    “It didn’t hurt to make it, right?”
    “You didn’t close your legs then, now deal with it!”

    Often women patients do their best not to complain and to follow the orders of the medical team …

    … André François, founder of ImageMagica, an organization that promotes education, culture and health through photography, has worked to document ‘humane medicine’ … In the process he has also documented medical abuse …

    Can an unwanted caesarian be a form violence against women?

    … vast differences in the health care system do exist. A universal healthcare system set to serve the poor in Brazil was widely established in 1988 offering free public healthcare for the first time to many in need. The system has suffered under many financial strains though with crumbling medical facilities and the theft of medical supplies in over crowed medical clinics that have had long lines with services that have turned critical needs patients away. But improvements in many levels of care have been made as some hospitals have been equipped with the newest medical equipment and trained medical staff.

    François saw Brazil’s system of health care up close when he witnessed the case of one woman from the Amazon who urgently needed a caesarean section. But her journey to the doctor would not be an easy one. To get the medical attention she needed, she would have to face 12 hours of … pain as she traveled by motor canoe to the nearest medical facility. In many regions of the country “when a woman needs a caesarean section, she will usually die,” says André.

    In spite of attempts to offer free health care to many of the underprivileged, a 2010 Brazilian study, “Women and Gender in Brazilian public and private spaces,” … 1 in 4 women in the country suffer today from some form of abuse during delivery.

    But is there a difference between abuse and violence against women during delivery? What is the perception?

    “Women with lower education, do not consider that the treatment they received was mistreatment and disrespect,” … “Through accounts of friends and people of the same social group, they listen that the hospital delivery is like that: it will hurt, you will scream, they will scream at you,” … “There is a perception of a picture that indeed is negative, but it is seen as normal. It is not even seen as mistreatment.”

    In the public hospital in the town of Ceará in northeastern Brazil there is a sign on the wall alerting patients about their human rights. It tells them that they must demand decent public medical service. At the same hospital though, another sign outlines a very different picture. On another sign is a quote from Article 331 of Brazil’s Criminal Code, known as the ‘Desacato laws,’ that prevents freedom of speech for anyone who wants to speak out against injustice, including any patient who wants to talk about their medical care.

    … Female patients who come from poor, rural and uneducated families often tend to be less acknowledged or counted as they become ‘objects’ in the hands of medical staff who can and do hold authority and power over them.

    The World Health Organization recommends that the rate of cesarean section in a country should not exceed 15 percent. In Brazil the latest data for cesarean in most public hospitals is 35 percent. … an alarming 80 percent of private hospital [use] cesarean section commonly. When women are asked if they want a cesarean delivery about 70 percent of women patients say no …

    Cesarean section, episiotomy, oxytocin and cosmetic vaginal surgery

    … “most women go to birth without information.” Many are also convinced to accept cesarean section during labor while they are suffering from acute pain and unable to make the best decision. Women who are able to give birth ‘naturally’ are also most often submitted to episiotomy during childbirth …

    … 90 percent of hospital births throughout Latin America use surgical procedures for episiotomy without any medical need or indication. Without consultation with their patients numerous doctors cut and sew the vagina to shrink it after childbirth and to ‘satisfy the husbands.’ This operation is known in Brazil as the ‘husband’s point.’ …

    … The time a woman takes to complete labor in birth is another issue for medical teams who want to speed up the process. “There are reports that in some public hospitals, a woman should not be in labor from one shift to another, and all cases have to be ‘fully managed’ during the same shift,” …

    In addition to episiotomy, some women receive doses of oxytocin to enhance uterine contractions – and consequently the pain – so their delivery with childbirth is faster. But is it safe? Distinct dangers to the mother with incorrect use of the drug can cause fatal fetal hypoxia, a condition that denies a woman’s baby of life saving oxygen during the process of childbirth …

    Is there a solution to the problems?

    Why do some medical teams mistreat patients in labor? Professional studies indicate that trivialization of social injustice, especially injustice against women, may be the cause. This can affect the entire society in Brazil, both male and female.

    … Finding and supporting a good team of health professionals who will seek better quality health care for Brazil is the goal of photojournalist André François …

    Since 2000 the Brazilian program called ‘Working with Traditional Midwives’ … has aimed to improve care for women with birth delivery at home. They also seek to raise awareness among health professionals to recognize midwives as important partners in the birth process for women.

    As the definition of violence against women during childbirth can be wide and subject to many interpretations, so can the concept in the ‘humanization’ of childbirth. Numerous advocates who believe that babies who are born through a philosophy of ‘woman-centered childbirth’ are also beginning to see how natural and appropriate approaches to new technology with birthing can work together. The hope by many women’s advocates in Brazil is to see the rates of abuse during childbirth labor decrease sharply.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    An amazing homebirth story

    Isabel is an amazing, strong woman who came to me for pregnancy care. She had planned to move overseas, and as you’ll read, her pregnancy came as a surprise. She planned a homebirth with a midwife overseas – but the story has a twist in it! We went about the pregnancy, preparing thoroughly for an active, natural and drug-free birth. I was thrilled to receive Isabel’s birth story, and she has kindly agreed to share it here.

    Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home. Now it is my turn to write the story I have been so looking forward to… I hope I help inspire another mum-to-be to have the great confidence in her own ability and her body’s ability to birth her baby safely and naturally…love Isabel xx

    Our beautiful birth story of baby Zachary by Isabel and Jed

    It started in mid-April when I noticed an unusual change in my body. I pee-ed my pants when I sneezed. Even though I have a very weak bladder control and recurrent cystitis I had never done that before. I decided to get a urine test and after 4 weak positives I decided the product was defective and I needed to go see a real doctor tomorrow.
    Half way through a busy day at work as a Veterinarian, caring for animals, it hit me that I might be pregnant and that we weren’t really ready for this big change in our lives. I broke down and cried. I left work early to go see the doctor. Jed met me at the clinic and we saw the doctor together. The doctor promptly told me, “My Dear, there isn’t such a thing as false positive results. Only false negative are possible. You ARE pregnant!”

    I guess at that point both Jed and I had a lot of conflicting feelings. We had only just gotten married less than a month ago. We had a wedding dinner to attend in Malaysia followed by a honeymoon which required us to trek over 4000km up a mountain. At the same time it was such a big surprise and blessing to know that we were able to have a baby. We both set about sorting through our feelings and thoughts for a couple of weeks before letting the rest of the family and friends know about it.

    It was a smooth pregnancy and we had amazing help and support from friends and family. We learnt so much from our lovely midwife, Melissa Maimann and our ante natal teacher, Julie Clarke. It was basically life changing. I had known I would have needed to hit the books for this but who would have thought I find so much conflicting information. It was hard making the right choices. It was doubly hard to not have my sisters around which I rely on so much for guidance. Jed was so good and read everything I told him to. I only had to chuck temper tantrums once a month. =)

    In the end, I decided I wanted to have a home birth because I dislike being told what to do with regards to my body and I strongly dislike needles. I spent a lot of time visualising what my ideal birth/labour would be like and tried to get the support network I needed to achieve this dream. It wasn’t easy finding medical people to agree so in the end I realised it would probably just be Jed, Alicia and my mom helping me. I prayed to whoever was listening that everything would go smoothly and I that neither Zachary or I would not need medical help.

    Fast forward about 9 months to December, my mucus plug came out throughout the day on the 13th with no signs of labour. So we decided to head over to the homeopath for back up help if needed to get the contractions going.
    Almost a week later, on the 22nd of December my waters broke at 2am. It was such a surreal feeling as I sneezed and wet the bed. I was surprised at how wet the bed was and decided to stand up and this big gush of clear warm water ran down my legs. I then realised that my waters had broken and that I would be meeting my baby today.
    I woke Jed up and told him the news. Since there were no signs of contractions once again I decided to take the homeopathic remedy and we both went back to sleep.

    By 4am, I was uncomfortable enough to wake up and walk around. I emptied my bowels multiple times and drank lots of water and ate some fruit. At 5am I woke Jed up and told him to pump up the exercise ball and warm up the heat packs. By 6am, contractions were regular and about 15 minutes apart, Jed started filling up the bath tub. However, there was no hot water because the water heater had been turned off. So off he woke mom up to take over comforting me and went to boil many many pots of water.

    I sat on the bathroom floor rocking on the exercise ball and constantly visualising a soft open cervix and my baby descending nicely. I breathed nicely through each contraction remember our Calmbirth classes.
    Heat packs placed on the lower back and under the belly helped with the discomfort as well.
    The exercise ball was good for sleeping and resting on between contractions. Around 7 o’clock the bath tub was finally ready, got in and felt lots better. Alicia came shortly after and took over from mom. She gave awesome back rubs and was such a grounding energy which was exactly what I needed to get things done. Things went quickly after that.

    Jed got into the water around 8am and I knelt down with my arms wrapped around him. Contractions were about 5 minutes apart then and required a lot more attention. I kept reminding myself that each contraction meant one step closer to seeing Zachary. I felt him slowly pressing down on my cervix and my cervix dilating.
    Vocalising helped during the contractions. Jed was a great help reminding me to breathe and not hold my breath.
    He was like a rock I knew I could rely on. Did a few self vaginal exams and could feel Zachary’s head progressing downwards.
    At about 8.20am I realised I was in transition, his head was crowning and I wasn’t fully dilated. Was upset and freaked out but Alicia reminded me to trust in my body. Took a deep breath and focused on opening my cervix up. A few minutes later I was ready to push, Zachary came out head first with a hand. I rested for a few seconds till the next contractions came and looked up at Jed and said “Are you ready? He is coming.” Jed caught Zachary Francis McKenna at 8.38am
    We were both ecstatic and sat there admiring for a while. He started crying almost immediately and looked around at all of us.
    Stood up and tried to birth placenta but couldn’t so I went back to the room. He started feeding soon after and I was enjoying his skin to skin contact. The doctor arrived soon after he advised us to clamp the cord and get the placenta out.
    Jed was frantic and really wanted the placenta out because he was worried about bleeding. I was getting a little annoyed by his constant fussing. We clamped the cord and Jed cut it. The doctor applied gentle traction and got the placenta out. Finally we were left alone for some quiet time.

    I would like to thank my lovely husband for supporting me through the pregnancy and birth and agreeing to a home birth and studying so hard.
    I would also like to thank Melissa and Julie for their teachings which allowed me to have the confidence to do this, although neither of them endorsed free birthing they were not judgmental.

    No amount of thank you can express my gratitude for having Alicia around to show me there were many options and that we need to take charge of our own births.
    Many thanks to my Mom and Dad for allowing me to use their house. Last of all, Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Delivering better maternity care

    Link

    Despite countless inquiries, initiatives and ministerial pledges … maternity care remains one of the NHS’s problem areas …

    In recent weeks there have been two significant pieces of evidence published that will help shape practice affecting the UK’s 800,000 births a year. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced new guidelines for the NHS in England and Wales on the circumstances in which mothers-to-be should be able to have a Caesarean-section delivery.

    Meanwhile the landmark Birthplace study … sought to clarify the relative risks of having a baby at home, in hospital or in a birth centre run by midwives; the study found all settings carried a low level of risk. Both documents aim to advise maternity teams on how to give mothers and their babies the best possible experience.

    … It is no wonder maternity services are under pressure … England has had a 22% increase in births over the past decade …

    But the maternity workforce is not just short of midwives, the roundtable heard. Of those 800,000 annual births, 94% of them take place in hospitals where doctors are present along with midwives; the others, at home (2%) and in birth centres (4%), have midwives solely in charge. But the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) believes the 2,186 senior doctors working as consultants in that area of medicine is too few. It wants the NHS to boost numbers to 3,000-3,300.

    Mothers-to-be would benefit because every hospital maternity unit would have a consultant on hand 24/7 and less experienced doctors would no longer be in charge overnight and at weekends …

    … “the current system of maternity care is unsustainable. You have to reconfigure”. The participant meant that some maternity units should be closed – merged, in effect – so fewer, larger childbirth centres could offer mothers a better service, partly thanks to more specialist staff handling a greater number of deliveries concentrated in the same place.

    It makes little sense for large urban areas to have separate maternity units just a few miles apart, a view confirmed for the speaker by seeing that sort of setup on a recent visit to Leeds and nearby towns.

    Many health professionals support the concept of reorganisation. And the reconfiguration of neonatal care services in 2003, which led to fewer units dealing with sick babies but offering enhanced care, is a potential model to follow, another participant added. But there is a major obstacle to overcome first: … To close your core maternity service is a death trap as an MP. So that will not happen,” …

    … simply creating fewer, but larger, hospital units is not the answer and there needs to be more midwife-led birth centres, either standalone units or situated beside hospitals, in case a mother needs urgent medical attention …

    There was also a strong consensus that the huge proportion of births occurring in hospitals, 94%, is too high. While there was support for moving towards an equal split – 33% at home, 33% in birth centres and 33% in hospital – there was also a recognition that politics, entrenched attitudes and the tightest NHS budget in a generation means that will probably remain just an aspiration for the foreseeable future.

    … In 2007, Maternity Matters promised women in England a choice of birth place, but the reality is that many still do not get that. One participant working on the NHS frontline said pressure on maternity services was so great in some places that midwives who usually help women to have home births are having to work, instead, on labour wards, thus depriving those seeking a home birth of that supposedly guaranteed right.

    Similarly, surveys by the Healthcare Commission and its successor as the NHS regulator for England, the Care Quality Commission, have shown the promise to women of one-to-one care from a midwife during their labour is also not honoured for as many as a quarter of mothers-to-be, who are left alone and find it stressful …

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    NC Women Face Charges After Newborn’s Death

    Link

    Two women have been charged with practicing midwifery without a license in North Carolina after a newborn died following an underwater home birth.

    … Charlotte police say the women were at a private home last week assisting with an underwater birth, in which the baby is delivered in a tub of warm water … there were complications with the delivery, and the newborn died after being rushed to a local hospital.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Couple threaten legal action to ensure homebirth service; hospital engages private midwives for homebirth service

    Link

    Bosses at Whipps Cross University Hospital have decided to reinstate its home births service after a couple threatened legal action.

    The cash-strapped hospital in Leytonstone announced earlier this month that it would be impossible to provide midwives to households from December 18 for up to six weeks due to staff shortages.

    But now … extra funding has been made available to pay for an independent midwife service for those who were hit by the sudden suspension.

    Adam and Michelle Boult … were planning to have a home birth in January and were so outraged by the hospital’s plan to stop the service they called in a barrister, who argued the hospital had a legal responsibility to support them.

    Mr Boult, a 32-year-old journalist, said: “While they would probably deny it, to get them to agree to this has taken an extraordinary amount of pressure.

    “We were lucky enough to have a very helpful barrister and solicitor who have pushed for the Trust to reconsider its stance, culminating in Whipps Cross receiving a pre-action letter suggesting a judicial review”.

    … In a joint statement, Whipps Cross and ONEL said: “[We] are committed to offering all women in the local area the best possible choice of how and where they give birth.

    “We have been working together to find a way to offer a home birth service during the next four weeks. Safety is our priority, and we did have some concerns about staffing levels over this period.

    “However, by working together, the hospital and NHS ONEL are now able to bring in independent midwives for this limited period, until the hospital’s Home Birth Service team is in place.

    “This means those women who asked for a home birth in the next four weeks can have one. We have always been committed to developing the Home Birth Service and to ensuring we provide high quality, safe and consistent services to all women.”

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Unassisted: Home Birth in Nebraska

    Link

    … Birth is big business to a healthcare industry … Hospitals are reinventing themselves to create an atmosphere catering to a woman’s evolving needs. However, some Nebraska women want to take their business out of the hospital altogether, but find their choice may not be a legally viable option.

    Methodist Women’s Hospital … sits just off the interstate in Elkhorn. The modern, two-building facility is a “one-stop shop” for women’s health. Women-centered facilities are not a new concept in the health care industry, but resorting back to a more home-like and natural birth experience is … the hospital’s new labor and delivery rooms … are as “home-like” as they can get.

    … a lot more women are asking for natural birth plans lately, meaning births with limited medical interferences such as epidurals, labor inducing medications, and cesarean sections. After our tour, I asked Korth about the most natural of birth plans: the home birth.

    “We feel like we’ve done a very good job as getting as close to that as we possibly can,” she said …

    But, there are some Nebraska couples who feel a hospital will never replace the comfort of home …

    “I’m terrified of hospitals,” laughed Katie. And she knows hospitals, Katie works at one in Omaha and her husband, John, is a paramedic.

    “It’s just an uncomfortable environment, I think,” she said. “From the bed you’re in, to the room that you’re in, to multiple people coming in and out, in and out, not necessarily telling you what they’re doing or what’s going on—they’re just doing it. It’s just so impersonal…I’m just afraid of that.”

    The couple is not expecting just yet, but is looking at their options. They prefer an assisted home birth with a … Midwife, but they will face some difficult choices in their planning. The birth experience they want is also an illegal one. Nebraska is one of two states where an assisted home birth attended by a … Midwife is prohibited. Alabama is the second.

    Katie fears the professional and personal implications of having a home birth.

    “I would fear for my job if I had a home birth,” she said. “But it is scary, the thought of doing it, not just my job, but with my family and society and the view of what that means.”

    John said he’s also unsure of the professional implications he could face. He hasn’t told any of his paramedic instructors about their plans, but only one co-worker because he said he trusts her.

    … If Katie decides on a home birth, it would be difficult to find a … Midwife willing to help. The penalties for an attending midwife can range from license revocation to jail time.

    … Prentice is the owner of the WomanKind Midwifery, located in … South Dakota … She never delivers in Nebraska, but says Nebraska mothers from as far southeast as Lincoln drive hours, or days, to see her. She said these women are “desperate” to have a different type of natural birth.

    Speaking from her office in Spearfish, Jeanne said, “They want a different experience, they don’t want to be induced, they don’t want an epidural, they don’t want to be flat on their back with a monitor. They want something different. They want that personal care. And they can’t get it in their home state.”

    Prentice said the atmosphere that compels women to drive hundreds of miles can never be replicated in a hospital setting. Hospitals are meant to treat disease … something she sternly added pregnancy is not. And as for the new home-like atmospheres, Prentice isn’t buying it. She feels hospitals are quick to perform interventions, sometimes unnecessarily, breaking the tranquility of an otherwise quiet room.

    “You can put nice Pergo floor in and you can hide your equipment, but the minute things look a little or feel a little scary to you, you drag that stuff out,” …

    … Back in Elkhorn, Certified Nurse Midwife, Marilyn Lowe is one of four CNMs who make up Methodist’s new Midwifery Department. Lowe says a natural birth doesn’t have to take place outside of a hospital. After a full day of seeing patients, Lowe spoke with me after hours in her office.

    “Birth is a philosophy,” Lowe said. “And it can be as natural in a hospital as it can be in a home. Our goal is to help that woman accomplish what she wants to accomplish.”

    “We also have patients who want epidurals,” she said. “But if somebody wants a natural birth, that is our goal to help them accomplish that with as little intervention, but yet knowing if we need that intervention, it’s available.”

    … But for Katie and John, not having the option of an attended home birth leaves them feeling unsafe and frustrated. Katie is perplexed at the notion that they can deliver themselves, but not with a trained professional.

    “For me I want to have a home birth, but I don’t wanna just be by myself at home popping out a kid,” she said. “What if something goes wrong?”

    “My biggest frustration is that I can have a home birth, me and my husband can have our kid at home, but we can’t have somebody who’s trained to be there with us.”

    … Tony Fulton of Lincoln wants to repeal a single line in Nebraska’s medical laws: the one prohibiting … Midwives from attending home births …

    Fulton was approached by Nebraska mothers asking for his help years ago … “For them to be stigmatized as strange or awkward, it’s the ultimate of ironies because these are moms,” … “And often times the stigmas are being foisted upon them by those who are not moms.”

    Jessica Freeman is a mother of three and a board member of Nebraska Friends of Midwives. During her first pregnancy, she said like most newly expectant mothers, she had read many books on child birth. But when it came time to deliver, she said she experienced interventions by hospital staff she felt might not be safe.

    Her doctor broke her water, and told her to push, an urge, Freeman said, she never had.

    “I came out feeling… just not sure what I was doing,” Freeman said. … And that translates into your mothering.”

    That experience led Freeman to seek out a home birth for her next two children. Her first home birth was performed in New York, and despite the ban, her second was in Nebraska. For that birth, Freeman imported a midwife from New York*. (*Correction: the imported midwife was not from New York, but was imported from another state)

    “We’re not looking for 50 percent of births to be in the home,” she said. “We’re just saying we want the ones who know about home birth, want to be able to have a safe home birth, we want to be able to have an attendant there, to make sure nothing goes terribly wrong, and to help us if something does go wrong.”

    … Sarah Jacobitz-Kizzier is in her final year as a University of Nebraska Medical Center student. She’s planning to become a family physician. I asked her why she believes the medical community is resistant to allow home births. She said it’s a “fear of lawsuits, losing their own medical license …

    … in medical school, the practice of home birth is never brought up. And often, she said, the topic was “taboo” with fellow med students. She said she feels women should have as many options as they want. And she said there are widespread misconceptions about women who want home births.

    “The one that is most polarizing and the most untrue, is … that women who choose to do home births are labeled as having a stronger emphasis on the process of the birth rather than the outcome …

    … “Virtually every other state allows this except Nebraska,” he said. “Either Nebraska is going to be the safest place on the planet to have babies, or it’s going to stick out like a sore thumb.”

    No matter how “home-like” the hospital delivery suite is, it will never be like home. There is something about being in your own private, comfortable and familiar space, using your own shower / kitchen / lounge room, eating off your own plates and being surrounded by what you know, that can never be replicated by a hospital. Of course, some women will be safer birthing in the hospital, but wherever possible, I believe women should be encouraged and supported to birth at home.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Myths and Truths of Obesity and Pregnancy

    Link

    Ironically, despite excessive caloric intake, many obese women are deficient in vitamins vital to a healthy pregnancy …

    … Many obese women are vitamin deficient …

    Forty percent are deficient in iron, 24 percent in folic acid and 4 percent in B12. This is a concern because certain vitamins, like folic acid, are very important before conception, lowering the risk of cardiac problems and spinal defects in newborns. Other vitamins, such as calcium and iron, are needed throughout pregnancy to help babies grow.

    … vitamin deficiency has to do with the quality of the diet, not the quantity. Obese women tend to stray away from fortified cereals, fruits and vegetables, and eat more processed foods that are high in calories but low in nutritional value.

    “Just like everybody else, women considering pregnancy or currently pregnant should get a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, lean proteins and good quality carbohydrates. Unfortunately, these are not the foods people lean towards when they overeat,” noted Thornburg. “Women also need to be sure they are taking vitamins containing folic acid before and during pregnancy.”

    … In 2009, the Institute of Medicine revised its recommendations for gestational weight gain for obese women from “at least 15 pounds” to “11-20 pounds.” According to past research, obese women with excessive weight gain during pregnancy have a very high risk of complications, including indicated preterm birth, cesarean delivery, failed labor induction, large-for-gestational-age infants and infants with low blood sugar.

    If a woman starts her pregnancy overweight or obese, not gaining a lot of weight can actually improve the likelihood of a healthy pregnancy …

    … Obese women have increased rates of respiratory complications, and up to 30 percent experience an exacerbation of their asthma during pregnancy, a risk almost one-and-a-half times more than non-obese women.

    … Breastfeeding rates are poor among obese women, with only 80 percent initiating and less than 50 percent continuing beyond six months, even though it is associated with less postpartum weight retention and should be encouraged as it benefits the health of mom and baby.

    … it can be challenging for obese women to breast feed. It often takes longer for their milk to come in and they can have lower production …

    Preconception care and a healthy eating and exercise program before pregnancy, that is maintained during pregnancy, can be helpful.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Balancing The Womb

    Link

    New research hopes to explain premature births and failed inductions of labour. The study by academics at the University of Bristol suggests a new mechanism by which the level of myosin phosphorylation is regulated in the pregnant uterus.

    … phosphorylation of uterus proteins at specific amino acids have a key role in the regulation of uterine activity in labour.

    A remarkable feature of the uterus … is that it remains relatively relaxed for the nine months of pregnancy … and then, during labour, it contracts forcibly and the baby is born. A special type of smooth muscle that grows and stretches during pregnancy to accommodate the fetus and the placenta forms the uterus.

    Hormones such as oxytocin or prostaglandins promote labour, but the biochemical changes that allow the switch from relaxation to contractions to happen are not fully understood. This makes it difficult to predict when a woman is going to deliver. In eight to ten per cent of women delivery occurs too early … On the other hand when labour has to be induced for medical reasons, it is impossible to know whether the induction will be successful or whether it will require an emergency caesarean section …

    … small biopsies of uterine tissue from women who delivered … demonstrated that contractions require both a calcium dependent pathway driven by myosin kinase and a calcium independent pathway that regulates the activity of myosin phosphatase …

    … “This study has increased our understanding of the biochemical changes underlying uterine activity and may help in the design of better drugs to prevent preterm labour or to induce labour successfully at term, benefiting many thousands of women and their babies.” …

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    I’m pregnant! What are my next steps?

    If you have just found out you are pregnant, congratulations! You might be feeling a range of emotions: excited, fearful, overwhelmed, happy, anxious … this is all very normal! Many women who contact me feel unsure about what to do next and are anxious to know all their options before making a choice, so I have put together a few tips to make you feel a little more confident.

    Although many women see their GP as their first port of call when they are pregnant, it’s handy to know that women may also see an eligible midwife who can order all the necessary pregnancy tests and any scans that are needed. An eligible midwife can also talk with you about the available options for your pregnancy and birth care, in a relaxed and unhurried setting. An eligible midwife can help you determine your due date and arrange any referrals that you may need. She can book you into a hospital, refer you to an obstetrician if needed, and also provide full pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    How do Midwives Work?

    It’s a common question I am asked! When people ask me what I do, I tell them I am a midwife. The next question is usually, “Oh, so you’re a nurse?”. “Not quite”, I reply, “a midwife – I care for women though pregnancy and birth and with their new baby.” Then they really look puzzled. “That’s not what an obstetrician does?” “An obstetrician is a doctor who specialises in caring for women with complicated pregnancies and births. A midwife specialises in caring for women who are having healthy pregnancies and births.” By that stage they’re well and truly confused and I start to wonder what we need to do to promote midwifery as a care option for all women.

    The term midwife means ‘with woman’. Midwives work in partnership with women through pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. Midwives can provide care to women from the time that the woman discovers she is pregnant, right up until her baby is 6 weeks old. In fact, women who experience a normal, healthy pregnancy and birth may not see a doctor at all! Eligible midwives are able to order all the necessary tests and scans during pregnancy and may refer directly to an obstetrician if their services are necessary.

    Midwives provide education, support, advice and information, as well as doing all the routine checks of mother and baby.

    Midwives advocate measures throughout pregnancy and birth that promote normal birth: that is a birth without interventions. Midwives and are experienced in such things as water birth, active birth, and so on.

    Midwives are also specially educated to know if anything is out of the ordinary, and they can get help from obstetricians. In pregnancy, midwives see women at intervals so that any issues that may present can be dealt with before they cause any major issues.

    Women who are cared for by one midwife from pregnancy through to birth have better outcomes in terms of safety, lower rates of intervention and satisfaction with their experience. Midwives too prefer to work in this way, getting to know each family individually.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.