‘Infertile’ women need more time

Link

One-in-four women with a history of infertility can still end up having a baby without treatment …

… women who have been clinically diagnosed as infertile after 12 months of unsuccessfully trying for a baby may actually just need longer to conceive.

While trying for a baby, there are many things a couple can do to maximise their chances of conception. These include naturopathic care, chiropractic, acupuncture and reflexology. It’s also a great opportunity to have a preconception appointment with a midwife or obstetrician.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Women need a year to recover from childbirth

Link

New mothers may be told that they will be back to ‘normal’ within six weeks of giving birth, but a new study has found that most women take much longer to recover.

… it takes a year to recover from childbirth

… The psychological effects can also take much longer to recover from.

… hospital wards can have a negative impact on women’s ability to recoup and celebrate the birth of their child because of the constant stream of visitors and the unfamiliar rules and regulations.

Helping new mothers adapt to having a baby in the home has also changed a lot over the years.

In the past women were shown how to perform tasks such as baby bathing and were only discharged from hospital when they were ready.

Now women can go home as soon as six hours after childbirth and many feel they are just ‘left to get on with it’.

Dr Wray said: ‘The research shows that more realistic and woman-friendly postnatal services are needed.

‘Women feel that it takes much longer than six weeks to recover and they should be supported beyond the current six to eight weeks after birth.

‘However, government funding cuts and a national shortage of midwives means that postnatal services will only face further challenges. The midwifery profession must raise the status of postnatal care as any further erosion can only be bad for women and their children.’ …

Private midwifery provides women with 6 weeks of comprehensive postnatal care.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Gestational diabetes to soar

Link

One in five pregnant women could be diagnosed with gestational diabetes under new criteria …

The number of women with gestational diabetes could increase 50 per cent under guidelines that will call for universal screening of pregnant women and lower the blood glucose level deemed for a positive diagnosis.

The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society has taken a year and a half preparing to adopt the international criteria, in part because of a fear the health system would be unable to cope.

… In the past, the level of blood glucose needed to qualify a woman as needing treatment for blood glucose was based on her risk of developing diabetes later in life.

But increasing research showing risks to the baby has led to a reassessment of the levels, which will decrease from 5.5mmol/L to 5.1mmol/L …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Popular fetal monitoring method leads to more c-sections

Link

This is not new news; we have known for some time that electronic fetal monitoring leads to more caesareans. This article confirms what we know. In my practice, women do not have routine electronic fetal monitoring in labour. I listen to the baby with a hand-held, water-proof doppler and this is an unobtrusive method that can be used while the woman is in the bath or shower or in any position.

Pregnant women in labor, upon arriving at the hospital, will often have their baby’s heart rate monitored to assess the baby’s wellbeing. A new research review suggests that the use of one popular method of monitoring does not improve maternal and fetal outcomes and makes women more likely to have cesarean sections …

The new review … looked at how each type of monitoring affected women admitted to the hospital in labor with low-risk pregnancies and found there was no benefit of using the CTG at admission. However, women who had an admission CTG were about 20 percent more likely to have a caesarean section compared to those monitored by intermittent auscultation.

… about 79 percent of maternity wards in the United Kingdom, 96 percent in Ireland and all of the labor units in Sweden employ an admission CTG.

The review included four studies of more than 13,000 women randomized to receive either CTG or intermittent auscultation upon their admission with signs of labor.

“Our findings support recommendations from professional bodies in some countries that state the admission CTG not be used for low-risk women,” …

… “We now know that this form of monitoring has not improved clinical outcomes,” he explained. “Instead, because of its inherent limitations, this form of monitoring leads to many ‘false alarms’ that are resolved by performing cesarean delivery.”

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Weight gain in pregnancy ‘risk factor for GDM in patients who were already obese’

Link

Weight gain in pregnancy is a significant risk factor for developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women who are already overweight, but not in those whose body mass index (BMI) was low or normal before conception …

… mothers-to-be who develop the complication put on more weight in the first 24 weeks of pregnancy than people whose glucose levels remain normal.

Good nutrition and lifestyle habits are really important for a healthy pregnancy, birth and baby. A preconception appointment with a midwife or obstetrician can help point women in the right direction to maximise health and well-being prior to pregnancy.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Cesarean Delivery May Not Be More Protective For Small, Premature Newborns

Link

…delivery by cesarean section may not be protective compared to vaginal deliveries for babies who are small for their gestational age … born more than six weeks before their due date.

“We found that infants delivered vaginally were not at a significantly increased risk for any neonatal complications. In fact, infants delivered by cesarean had significantly higher odds of breathing problems after birth,” … “This indicates that cesarean isn’t superior to vaginal deliveries for this high risk population.”…

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Factors influencing the fulfillment of women’s preferences for birthing positions during second stage of labor

Link

Having choices and being involved in decision making contributes to women’s positive childbirth experiences. During a physiological birth, women’s preferences can play a leading role in the choice of birthing positions … Midwives can contribute to women-centered care by proactively exploring women’s preferences for birthing positions throughout pregnancy and birth, supporting women in developing well-informed choices and facilitating these choices where possible.

In my practice, the vast majority of women birth in the position of their choosing, with a focus on upright, active positions. 45% women birth in water. I find the most commonly-chosen birth positions are all-fours and kneeling. All fours is great in terms of the partner catching the baby, while in a kneeling position, the woman can catch her baby.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Inducing Labor Better for Big Babies

Link

The study below has made a compelling argument for induction for babies who are thought to be large for their gestational age. The first thing to ascertain before deciding on a course of action, is that the baby is truly larger than expected. All methods of judging a baby’s size in the uterus are prone to error, for example ultrasound has a 15% margin of error. Therefore we need to take this into account when we are advising women of the safest options. Many inductions (and even caesareans) are performed for “big” babies, only to have the induction go pear-shaped and lead to a caesarean … for a 3.5Kg baby. On the other hand, an earlier induction for a genuinely large baby may well prevent a caesarean, forceps birth, perineal trauma (tears, episiotomy) and so on.

Large-for-date babies are more likely to experience neonatal trauma if nature is allowed to take its course than if labor is induced …

Among fetuses estimated sonographically to be above the 95th percentile for weight, adverse events such as shoulder dystocia were three times less likely if labor was induced …

Induction of labor also was associated with a greater likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery …

Previous observational studies have suggested that induction of labor may lower birth weight and decrease the chance for neonatal injury such as shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, and death.

However, studies also found increased rates of cesarean section with induction, and the reliability of fetal weight estimation has been questioned.

… 817 women … were assigned to be induced within three days of enrollment or to expectant management.

They averaged 37 weeks gestation, and fetal weight was estimated at an average of 3,700 grams.

The difference between the groups was approximately nine days additional gestation in the expectant management group along with a 287-g (10 oz.) higher birth weight.

In the expectant management group, 6.6% of neonates experienced shoulder dystocia, compared with 2.2% in the induced group …

Also significant was the difference in vaginal deliveries, which occurred in 58.7% of the induced births and 51.7% of expectant births.

Cesarean section was needed in 28% of the induction group and 31.7% of the expectant group.

Secondary outcomes — including clavicular fracture and brachial plexus injury — were similar between the two groups.

There were no serious or permanent brachial plexus injuries or deaths.

… The study demonstrated that prevention of macrosomia at birth can lead to safe birth outcomes …

The other aspect that has not been mentioned in this study is the importance of caring for women and providing advice that will help them to grow a baby who is appropriate for their pelvis, to maximise the chance of a normal birth. This is an essential aspect of the care that I provide to women.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Home births get backing from Dannii Minogue

Link

DANNII Minogue would not hesitate to try to have a home birth again.

… Minogue remains a staunch defender of the practice that continues to be a hot topic of debate among many mothers.

Minogue tried to give birth to her son … at … home … but, after labouring for several hours, was transferred to the hospital on the advice of her midwife.

“I don’t care what anyone else says about having a home birth, that felt right for me,” she said. “It’s about your body and what you feel comfortable with” …

Homebirth is a really special and wonderful way to bring a baby into the world. Even if a transfer is needed, most women would agree with Dannii that the model of care that is provided means that a transfer can be a physically and emotionally safe experience.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

VBAC: Slow Dilation May Warn of Rupture

Link

This is not new news: it has been known for many years that women who dilate slowly during a VBAC labour are at an increased risk of uterine rupture. This study confirms what we know. The question is: how slow too too slow? Some midwives and obstetricians talk in terms of VBAC labour lasting no more than 12 hours. I think that an arbitrary time limit is unhelpful, because there is a difference between no progress over a period of time, and slow progress over a period of time. So long as some progress is being made and the mother and baby are well, there is no reason not to continue with a VBAC labour, well-supported and encouraged in a natural, active birth.

Women with a previous cesarean delivery who attempt a vaginal delivery during a subsequent birth may be at risk for uterine rupture, depending on their rate of cervical dilation …

In a retrospective study, the time to progress 1 cm of dilation was similar between the study group and controls, until 7 cm of dilation … at 7 cm dilation, women who experienced uterine rupture spent significantly longer times progressing 1-cm in dilation compared to controls — median hours from 7 cm to 8 cm was 0.39 versus 0.15 …

… Between 7 cm and 8 cm, the 95th percentile for women with a successful attempt at labor was 0.70 hours, compared with 1.57 hours for those who ruptured.

From 8 cm to 9 cm, the 95th percentile of time for progression was 0.38 and one hour for the two groups, respectively …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Birth plans

A birth plan records your preferences for care and clarifies what is important to you, while also helping your midwife to understand exactly the sort of care you would like to have so that she can do my best to help you to achieve it.

A word about birth plans

No birth ever goes strictly to plan, and sometimes there is a valid reason to depart from the birth plan, including your change of preference at the time of your labour and birth. Some families feel that because they have a birth plan, it will protect them from certain interventions or guarantee a certain birth experience. So before we go further, I need to be clear: things happen in birth. Sometimes things work out exactly how you want them to, but sometimes labour is a little longer, or a little shorter, sometimes babies’ heart rates don’t do so well in labour, sometimes women get exhausted, sometimes pregnancy lasts a bit longer than we expect – or a bit shorter than we expect … or blood pressure plays up … I am sure you understand my point. There are certainly things that you can do to lower your risk of certain complications or interventions, but you cannot really “plan” a birth so I think the wording gets confusing.

Your Birth Plan

There is no right or wrong birth plan. Once you have written your birth plan, the next step is to discuss it with your midwife or obstetrician.

Who will your support people be?
Will you wear your own clothes or a hospital gown?
If the baby’s siblings are going to be present, does each child have their own dedicated support person?

Labour:

Do you want to eat and drink?
How would you like to manage the sensations of labour?
Medical pain relief – would you like it to be offered to you, or would you prefer to ask for it?
Would you like to labour or birth in the bath / shower?

Birth:

Would you like a choice of birth position, or do you want to give birth on your back in bed?
Would you like to push as your body tells you to?
Do you want to touch your baby’s head as it emerges?
Would you like to catch your baby?
Consider how you would like the third stage to be managed (active or natural)
Who will cut the cord
Who will discover the sex of your baby

Postnatal and baby:

Breast or formula feeding?
Hepatitis B Immunisation?
Vitamin K? Drops or injection?

My Birth Plan

In answer to my clients’ most common questions, I have written my own “birth plan” (just the important parts) to help them know what to expect from me. Of course, the following is for a textbook normal birth and your labour may demand a few variations, or a completely new plan!

Labour:

Women wear their own clothes.
I don’t offer medical pain relief. Women request it if they feel it is needed.
Women labour in the bath / shower / water birth; active labour and birth is encouraged.
I encourage women to labour and birth off the bed.
Monitoring: I use the Doppler as a routine. Continuous monitoring is only used when genuinely necessary, and if used, I would endeavour to use telemetry to enable you to be mobile and use the bath and shower.
Vaginal examinations: I would perform one at your request, if I am concerned about progress in labour or if there is some other need.

Birth:

All-fours or kneeling position (or other upright position) OFF the bed
Instinctive pushing
No episiotomy
Physiological (natural) third stage; Syntocinon injection if needed for bleeding before or after the placenta is born
Cord cut after the placenta has been born

Postnatal and baby:

Breast feeding on demand; baby has unrestricted access to the breast.
Breastfeeding and bonding before attending the newborn exam and weighing and measuring baby
Immunisations optional
Vitamin K – oral or injection (injection if any risk factors are present)

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Heartburn and indigestion in pregnancy

This is very common in pregnancy and occurs due to the effects of progesterone and the added pressure of the baby against the intestines. Try dietary changes – smaller, more frequent meals; a light dinner; avoid spicy and fatty foods. Eat raw almonds, pineapple or pawpaw after a meal. Sit upright for at least ½ hour after eating. Drink slowly. Avoid any foods that you seem to be sensitive to. Reflexology and acupuncture may assist.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Leg cramps in pregnancy

Leg cramps are commonly experienced in pregnancy, and there are many things you can do to help! Consider making some dietary changes – increase calcium rich foods (dairy products, canned fish, dark green vegetables, sesame seeds, bananas). Massage, acupuncture, Bowen therapy and reflexology can also help. Supplements such as calcium, magnesium, Vit B complex, or Vit E should be considered.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Backache, sciatica and symphysis pubis pain in pregnancy

Lower back pain is common in late pregnancy. It is caused by the softening of the ligaments of the lower back and pelvis, the extra weight of the baby, and a change in your balance / centre of gravity. Strong abdominals muscles can help support your back. Sciatica can be alleviated through osteopathy, chiro, physio, reflexology, Bowen therapy and acupuncture.

To improve back pain, try alternating between standing and sitting. Wear supportive shoes with a sensible heel (not stilettos), and try lying tummy-down on a bean bag to take the weight off your back. Pelvic rocking can also ease the discomfort. When you need to pick something up, squat, rather than bend. Daily exercise will help too. Remember to sit on your sit bones, and place a stool or telephone book under your feet if they do not reach the ground. When you get out of bed, bend your knees and roll on to your side. Then push yourself up using your hand so that you are in a sitting position. To get into bed, climb onto the bed on your hands and knees. Lower your hips to your heels (kneeling) and then roll on to your side. Reflexology, osteopathy, acupuncture, massage or Bowen therapy can assist.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Anaemia in pregnancy

Anaemia is a physiological (healthy) adaptation to pregnancy and is caused by the dilution of your blood. If you – or your midwife – are concerned by anaemia, consider dietary changes – eat food rich in iron (dark green leafy vegetables, red meat, whole grains, dried fruit, parsley, watercress). Avoid tea and coffee.

Supplements – make sure these contain iron and Vitamin C. Some brands can cause constipation. In this case, try Floradix (a liquid form) or FAB Co (tablet form) or Spatone. Herbal supplements include nettle, peppermint, blackcurrant and parsley tea. If anaemia is severe, your midwife may ask to do additional blood tests to determine the cause of anaemia.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

How do I know if my baby is getting enough milk?

Many mothers are concerned that their babies are not getting enough milk, for various reasons. When you know the signs to look for, you will be able to assess for yourself whether your baby is getting enough milk and you will most likely find that your baby is very healthy and is most certainly getting all the milk that s/he needs.

A baby who is breastfed and is receiving all the milk s/he needs will:

  • Have 6 – 8 wet nappies per day
  • Have soft bowel movements.
  • Have at least 6 feeds in 24 hours.
  • Grow! This can be demonstrated by weighing your baby regularly. You can also tell by seeing how clothes fit on your baby. As time passes, you should notice clothes getting tighter and larger sizes should be needed.
  • Be alert when s/he is awake.
  • Be settled between feeds (at least for some of the time).
  • Have bright eyes.
  • Have good muscle and skin tone.
  • Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Midwives Make Home Births Safer for Babies

    Link

    Babies born at home are at increased risk for health problems immediately after birth compared with babies born in hospitals … However, a midwife may make a difference in the health of babies born at home …

    … babies born at home were more likely to have a neonatal seizure and low Apgar scores at five minutes after birth … But when a … midwife was present, it seems babies born at home may fare as well as those born in hospitals …

    … Home births are known to be associated with fewer obstetric interventions …

    … findings are based on an analysis of more than 2 million births in the United States in 2008. Of these, 12,433 (or 0.54 percent) were home births …

    It is helpful to have studies that can demonstrate the value of midwifery care in a home birth. Homebirth often gets a back rap in the media, however often the media confuses unattended homebirths with midwife-attended homebirth.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Caesareans Not The Best For Small Babies

    Link

    Cesarean deliveries have not been considered damaging or risky to a new born’s health, but new research is beginning to overturn that assumption …

    … C-sections are often performed for babies diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction who are not growing adequately in the womb. … small for gestational age babies delivered by a c-section before 34 weeks of pregnancy had 30 percent higher odds of developing respiratory distress syndrome than babies born vaginally at a similar gestational age.

    … “These findings overturn conventional wisdom that c-sections have few or no risks for the baby and are consistent with the March of Dimes effort to end medically unnecessary deliveries before 39 weeks of pregnancy … Although in many instances, a c-section is medically necessary for the health of the baby or the mother, this research shows that in some cases the surgery may not be beneficial for some infants.”

    Preterm birth … is the leading cause of newborn death … It is also a serious health problem costing the United States more than $26 billion annually … Babies who survive an early birth often face the risk of lifelong health challenges, such as breathing problems, cerebral palsy, learning disabilities and others …

    Occasionally a caesarean will be a life-saving option for either the mother or the baby, however the majority of caesareans can safely be performed after 39 weeks of pregnancy – or be avoided altogether! Roughly 90% women who have previously had a caesarean will go on to have another one for subsequent pregnancy, compounding the risks to mother and baby in subsequent pregnancies.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Doctor’s preference has strong influence on VBAC

    Link

    Women who have previously given birth by caesarean are strongly swayed by the opinion of their doctor when it comes to how they should have their second child …

    … mothers in this situation are poorly educated on the risks they face with each delivery option.

    Despite vaginal births having up to an 80 per cent success rate among those who have had a previous caesarean, most women surveyed decided against having their baby this way.

    “Even though most women can achieve a vaginal delivery with trial of labour, less than ten percent of them attempt to do so,”

    … 43 per cent of mothers [thought] their doctors preferred the idea of trial of labour went through with it, while only four per cent did when they claimed their physician was in favour of caesarean.

    … the vast majority of patients were unaware of the chances of success and danger through vaginal delivery and more than half did not know which delivery method had a faster recovery time …

    This raises an interesting discussion around informed consent doe VBAC versus elective repeat caesarean. What did your midwife or obstetrician tell you about caesarean versus VBAC, and were you swayed by their opinion? Did you choose your midwife or doctor based on whether they would support you in a planned VBAC or caesarean?

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Breastfeeding: Benefits for you, benefits for baby

    Benefits for you

  • Breastfeeding is free. This means that more money is available for essential baby needs / family spending.
  • Breastfeeding saves time – a lot of time is associated with formula feeding (shopping for formula, bottles, teats, dummies, and sterilisers; preparation, sterilising)
  • The time saved by breastfeeding allows you to enjoy your baby more.
  • Convenience: when you breastfeed, you do not need to worry about carrying bottles, formula, teats etc with you. You do not need to be near a power point for heating bottles; you do not need to be concerned if you are away from home longer than you planned to be.
  • Better bonding with your baby.
  • Breastfeeding helps you re-gain your pre-pregnancy weight.
  • Breastfeeding helps your uterus to clamp down after birth and in the weeks following. This reduces blood less and plays a role in preventing post-natal anaemia.
  • Breastfeeding is a relaxing experience that helps to regulate your hormones.
  • Breastfeeding delays the return of menstruation.
  • Breastfeeding can be used as a contraceptive under some circumstances, safely and effectively – please discuss this with me if you wish to know more. As a contraceptive, breastfeeding is free, natural and easy. There are no side-effects.
  • Breastfeeding can enhance your long term health: women who breastfeed experience less breast cancer, ovarian cancer and osteoporosis.
  • Benefits for your baby

  • Breastfeeding is clean. There is no need to worry about sterilising bottles and preparing formula.
  • Breastfeeding is safe and no medical conditions are caused by breastfeeding.
  • Babies who are breastfed experience less gastroenteritis (upset tummies) and are less likely to experience allergies, asthma, diabetes and obesity in childhood. They are also less likely to experience colds (through transfer of antibodies from mother to baby), respiratory infections, ear infections and urinary tract infections. There is some research that supports the idea that breastfeeding protects babies from SIDS. The increased health that breast-fed babies enjoy means that you spend less time attending medical appointments and worry less about your baby.
  • Breast milk contains proteins, antibodies, vitamins and minerals and other elements that are not found in formula. This makes breast milk the perfect food for babies.
  • Breastfeeding helps to develop the baby’s jaw muscles and tongue movements. Hence, breastfed babies often talk earlier than formula-fed babies.
  • Breast milk is the only food a baby needs for the first 6 months.
  • Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Why use natural methods for dealing with labour?

    Natural methods of pain management focus on the resources within yourself. Women who achieve a natural birth experience a greater sense of empowerment and confidence and this lasts through motherhood. They bond better with their babies, have improved breastfeeding experiences and have less postnatal depression. Natural pain control methods result in less intervention in the labour. While some labours require intervention, all intervention carries risks and complications, and this in itself makes the labour less safe. Natural methods avoid unnecessary intervention, therefore making for a safer birthing experience for you and your baby.

    Specific Strategies

  • Use of positions (standing, squatting, all fours, side-lying). Upright positions increase the pressure on the cervix, sending a positive feedback mechanism to the brain that promotes the secretion of oxytocin.
  • Bath, shower, massage, aromatherapy, acupuncture, acupressure, visualisation, relaxation, music, calm voices, hot packs, encouragement
  • Breathing techniques
  • Stay well hydrated and eat as you need to.
  • Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    All about epidurals

    An epidural is a type of anaesthetic that involves an injection of medication that blocks the transmission of pain. It is administered by an anaesthetist, who is a doctor who specialises in making people numb for operations. An epidural involves inserting a fine plastic tube into the epidural space in the lower spine. This is not in the spinal cord, but in the space surrounding the spinal cord.

    Epidurals prevent pain sensation from being felt from the waist down. This means that if you have an epidural, you will not have sensation from below your waist, including your legs and feet. This means you will not be able to get up out of bed to move around.

    I always explain to my clients that an epidural is really part of a package: it is impossible toy have an epidural on its own. The epidural package consists of a drip, a catheter into your bladder, continuous monitoring of your baby’s heart beat and often having your waters broken and a drip to speed the labour.

    Continuous monitoring is needed because with an epidural on board, the labour can often become more complicated and the baby’s heart rate can change.
    With an epidural, you will not be able to feel to pass urine, so a catheter will be inserted into your bladder.
    It is possible for your contractions to slow after you have an epidural, so it might be necessary for your midwife to break your water and start a drip to ensure that the contractions continue to come.
    Finally, all of the numbness means that your pelvic floor will relax. This can prevent the baby from rotating to an anterior position, increasing the chance of a caesarean or forceps and an episiotomy.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    New induction policy a threat to women, or a threat to doctors? You be the judge.

    An article in The Newcastle Herald yesterday states that:

    pushing a policy to reduce caesarean births are creating rules that are potentially dangerous for patients and threatening to doctors … red tape is threatening professional independence.

    It also discouraged treatment tailored to individual patients.

    … Compliance with directives telling obstetricians when and how to deliver babies was mandatory, under the threat of disciplinary action and loss of indemnity cover …

    … a recent directive requiring a reduction in caesarean section rates to 20per cent by 2015 was an illusory and possibly dangerous target.

    What is being referred to here is the NSW Health Policy Directive on induction of labour at or beyond term. It is a well-written and thorough document that can inform best practice for induction of labour. Rather than “telling obstetricians when and how to deliver babies”, it guides practice in a woman-centered manner:

    Induction of labour carries inherent risk and must be exercised with caution. There needs to be clear benefits for the mother and/or the fetus.

    At term, women must be offered information about the risks associated with prolonged pregnancies, and the options available to them.

    Induced labour has an impact on the birth experience for women. Labour is often more painful than spontaneous labour, and epidural analgesia and assisted delivery are more likely to be required.
    Treatment and care should take into account a woman’s individual needs and preferences. Women who are having, or being offered, induction of labour must have the opportunity to receive accurate information and make informed decisions about their care and treatment, in partnership with their health care professionals.

    This doesn’t sound like an approach that is potentially dangerous for patients or an approach that discourages treatment that is tailored to individual patients.

    The article goes on to assert that:

    Also concerning was a departmental policy that elective or pre-labour caesarean section must not routinely be carried out before 39weeks gestation, due to risk of respiratory morbidity in babies.

    And the problem is? All this is saying is that an elective or pre-labour caesarean should not routinely be carried out before 39 weeks. This is not the same as saying that caesarean can never be performed prior to 39 weeks, yet the contributors to the article go on to say that:

    ‘‘[The policy] effectively forbids doctors in NSW public hospitals to schedule routine elective caesarean section before 39weeks,’’ …‘‘Anyone doing so risks disciplinary action and may forfeit indemnity cover.’’

    This is clearly nonsense!

    The policy directive does state that:

    Induction of labour must not routinely be offered on maternal request alone.

    Health care professionals offering induction of labour must:
    • provide the woman with adequate time to discuss the information with her partner/support person before coming to a decision;
    • encourage the woman to access a variety of sources of information;
    • invite the woman to ask questions, and encourage her to think about her options; and
    • support the woman in whatever decision she makes.

    Women should be offered support and analgesia as required, and staff should encourage women to use their own coping strategies for pain relief. This includes the opportunity to labour in water.

    I fail to understand what is unreasonable about this policy which is evidence-based, woman-centered and flexible so as to meet the woman’s present health needs. Most health professionals practice within evidence-based guidelines, best practice guidelines and accepted standards of practice. These are developed in consultation with industry experts and after consultation of the relevant literature on the subject. I am curious that the obstetricians in this article are critical of a policy directive that is based on evidence and safe practice, citing that such a policy would threaten professional independence. RANZCOG has policies and guidelines, as does the UK Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. A mark of a professional body is that it possesses its own information that is unique to the profession. Why has this new policy directive caused such concern for doctors? It is merely suggesting that women should not be induced willy-nilly for no good reason and we have good evidence to justify this position.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    After baby arrives: midwifery care

    The focus of midwifery care is often “the birth”, however, the biggest “chunk” of midwifery care is pregnancy care, and then postnatal care. The birth – special, important and transforming as it is – is only one day (or night) in a ten-month professional relationship. I wanted to share some insights in postnatal midwifery care, as an often-neglected but important aspect of the care of a woman and her family.

    Once a baby is born, new parents can be thrown into an enormous sense of responsibility, combined with a very steep learning curve. A midwife helps the mother and family make this transition to parenthood. A midwife is there to help with breastfeeding, teach practical baby care and also to provide the necessary checks of mum and baby to ensure that the normal recovery process is underway.

    I provide my clients with extensive postnatal care because I know it can be a challenging time for a new family. I visit at home or in hospital every day for the first week. After that time, families can choose to see me in my private rooms or I visit them in their home. There are two visits in the second week, and then week 3, 4 and finally discharge at week 6.

    We do all sorts of things: I attend the baby’s newborn screening test (Blood spot test), I check the mother and baby to ensure that they are both recovering, we talk about breastfeeding and ensure that the baby is feeding well, we monitor the baby’s output to be sure that the baby is getting sufficient milk for his/her needs, I attend the Vitamin K drops for families who choose to give their babies Vitamin K drops, and we do lots of education about postnatal care, postnatal depression, what to expect with a new baby in the first few weeks, expressing milk, safe sleeping, adjusting to parenthood and so on.

    Over time, I have increased the care that I provide to my clients and the feedback from my clients has been that the current visiting schedule has enabled them to feel confident, safe and secure with their new baby. Much of this stems from the extensive preparation that my clients do in their pregnancy, and that most have a drug-free, natural birth. This seems to help with the baby’s adaptation to newborn life.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Maternal Death following a Homebirth

    Much has been published recently about the very unfortunate death of a mother following a homebirth with private midwives. No details have been released that could allow us to form an opinion that this woman’s death was “because” she birthed at home, and it is also possible that an appropriate and timely transfer was arranged and that she died of complications that arose in hospital. I am not privy to any more details than what can be found in the local press. Even though at this stage, no-one really knows how or why Caroline died, many people have taken the opportunity to make assumptions as to the exact cause of death, and more so, they are certain that her death would have been preventable and hence avoidable had she birthed in hospital. I am astounded that anyone could make such assumptions – and that the media would publish such opinions – when they are not grounded in fact.

    So, what do we know?

    Maternal mortality includes deaths in women up to a year after giving birth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy. The maternal mortality rate in Australia varies between about 8.4 and 11.1 per 100,000.

    Direct maternal deaths are those that result from obstetric complications of pregnancy. This includes such things as amniotic fluid embolism, haemorrhage, infection and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

    As well as direct maternal deaths, there are also indirect maternal deaths, and these are deaths that result from pre-existing disease which maybe aggravated by pregnancy or birth. This can include such things as heart disease, psychiatric causes, epilepsy and so on.

    It has been suggested that since 1999, there has only been one other woman who has died following a homebirth attended by a midwife. The AIHW report for 1997-99 also describes another maternal death following a homebirth, however that was an unattended homebirth (ie, the woman had given birth at home without a midwife present). Both women died of postpartum haemorrhages.

    The question we need to ask, is whether these reports of maternal death following homebirth reach statistical significance. In statistics, a result is statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It is possible that the two maternal deaths following midwife-attended home births are the only deaths we will have for the next 50-odd years; or it could be that in the next few years, we will have far more maternal deaths following midwife-attended homebirths. Certainly, other countries do not report an increased maternal mortality rate for women birthing at home with a midwife.

    All of this said, it is incumbent on every midwife who attends homebirths to advise women of the increased risk of death and serious injury should a major complication occur at home. This is related to the lack of resources, staff and facilities at home and the time and distance needed to transfer to hospital in an urgent situation. This, however, is also the case in a smaller public or private hospital, where if something should go horribly wrong, those facilities would also not have the immediate capability to provide the best possible assistance.

    In the event of major complications, a team effort is really needed: midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetist, operating theatre, intensive care unit, medications, IV lines, equipment for monitoring the heart and respiration and blood pressure, ultrasound imaging and so on. However, it also needs to be said that this would only be in very rare and exceptional circumstances that can mostly be known in advance. We also know that serious complications that can result in death are more likely when women have had interventions in labour and birth.

    This is why women are encouraged to birth in hospital if their medical history suggests that they are at a higher risk of life-threatening complications in birth (eg epilepsy, clotting disorders, high blood pressure, and so on), and it also why midwives are reluctant to attend any form of intervention in the home setting. At the slightest hint of a complication, a responsible midwife will advise her client to transfer to hospital in the interests of safety.

    All of this said (and done), low risk does not mean no risk. A perfectly healthy, low-risk woman experiencing a normal pregnancy and a normal labour can still experience a massive postpartum hemorrhage that cannot be effectively managed by the equipment available at a home birth. It also could not be managed at a small private or public hospital where theatre staff, anaesthetists, monitoring equipment etc might not be readily available. It is important for women to understand that while this is highly unlikely to ever happen, should it happen, it does increase the risk of death or serious injury (eg brain damage). It is a difficult task counselling women in very rare but very serious possibilities, and birthing women need to feel free to make the best decisions for them and their families, in the full knowledge of all possibilities. Midwives should not withhold this information from women as it is materially significant to their decisions about place of birth.

    Certainly, the media takes the view that all homebirth deaths could be prevented by having those women birth in hospital. This may be true. Or maybe not. Private midwives examine the deaths of women in hospitals, and often comment that those deaths might have been preventable had those women birthed at home or with a private midwife in hospital. Cases of women dying following unnecessary caesareans. Women suiciding in the early postnatal period with no support in caring for their baby and ineffective antenatal planning for the possibility of postnatal depression. Women dying of postpartum haemorrhage following induced labour (induction is a risk for PPH) for hypertension: it might surprise you to know that rates of high blood pressure are very low amongst women cared for by private midwives. A PPH in a woman who had had a caesarean for her third baby – a breech baby: this woman could very easily have proceeded with a vaginal birth, especially given that it was her third baby. Avoidance of the caesarean might have meant no PPH and saved her life. These are the sorts of cases where hospital doesn’t “save” women from death: it might be seen, in some cases to actually cause the death, however the media will never report on this.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Caesarean babies face more infections

    Link

    Some caesareans are genuinely necessary for the safety of mother or baby, so I wouldn’t like for this article to offend readers who may have had a caesarean that they feel was necessary for one reason or another. However, necessary or not, this article is reporting on the fact that babies who are born by caesarean tend to experience more infections than babies who were born vaginally. This adds to the other known risks of caesareans such as an increase in the rate of asthma, respiratory infections and diabetes.

    BABIES born by caesarean are much more likely to be admitted to hospital with gastrointestinal disease or chest infections in their first year of life than those born naturally … The babies were 22 per cent to 26 per cent more likely to be hospitalised with gastrointestinal disease and about 12 per cent more likely to be admitted with bronchiolitis, a type of chest infection …

    … children born by caesarean could miss out on picking up important gut bacteria that children born naturally get during the birth.

    “We take all these yoghurts and things to get the right bacteria in our guts but the baby travelling through the birth canal is going to get the right sorts of bacteria,” …

    … there could also be a link between caesareans and breastfeeding problems.

    … women who gave birth by caesarean were 70 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with a complication affecting breastfeeding.

    And the babies of the women with breastfeeding problems were then 30 per cent more likely to be hospitalised with gastrointestinal problems.

    … Earlier Australian research had found the link between bronchiolitis and caesareans existed with only planned caesareans, suggesting labour itself could activate the mothers’ immune system …

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Eating Fish While Pregnant is Good for Baby’s Brain Development

    Link

    … infants of mothers who consumed more fish during pregnancy achieved higher scores in verbal intelligence and fine motor skill testing, as well as having a higher pro-social behavior …

    Fish oil is the primary source of Omega-3 fatty acids and contains docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the main component of brain cell membranes … “it contributes to the normal development of the brain and eye of the fetus and breastfed infants” …

    Eating fish is good, but it’s also important to eat the right type of fish, as some fish is higher in mercury. As a guide, the smaller the fish, the better in terms of the fish having the lowest possible mercury content. Salmon and other types of fatty fish are also better for baby’s brain development than white fish. That’s not to say that white fish is not good for you and your baby – it’s very healthy – just that fatty fish is better in terms of baby’s brain development. Canned fish is also fine; the fish doesn’t need to be fresh. Enjoy it in a salad, on a sandwich, grilled with veges or in a stew. We can enjoy winter foods given all this winter weather we’re having!

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    “I’ve been told my baby is big”

    and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

    An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

    In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

    Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

    The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

    The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

    It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

    I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

    A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

    My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience?

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Cascade of intervention

    A study has found that first-time mothers who have their care within the general hospital system and have their labour induced, face a greater risk of having a caesarean section than those who wait for labour to start on its own.

    In the study, 44 percent women had their labour induced, and 20% of those inductions failed (ie, labour did not start) and caesareans were performed in those cases.

    By definition, induction is performed before a woman’s body is ready for labour, and this may point to the reason for such a high rate of failed inductions. In other cases, the reason for the induction is also the reason that the caesarean became necessary. For example, a labour may be induced because of concerns for the baby, and once in labour, the baby shows signs that it is not tolerating labour well and so a caesarean is performed.

    The study does point to the issue that inductions should not be performed unless they are genuinely necessary. Up to 50% inductions may not be “indicated”, that is, performed for a medical reason. They might be performed more for convenience, for example. However, if we limit inductions to those which really need to be done, we would lower the caesarean rate.

    There are some reasons when an induction might be a good idea, such as when the woman’s blood pressure is high, if the pregnancy goes beyond 42 weeks, if the waters have broken for many hours and labour has not started, if there are concerns for the baby and so on.

    Before any induction is commenced, it’s important that women are fully informed by their care provider of the reasons for the induction, the alternatives, the process and procedure, what to expect and the likely outcome.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.