Reasons that women don’t engage private midwives

  1. She doesn’t know what a private midwife does.
    A private midwife is a midwife who works in a private practice.  Women who elect to be treated as private patients choose their care provider, so this means that a midwife who works in private practice works with women in the private health system providing complete continuity of care.  Private midwives usually consult with women in the midwife’s office or consulting rooms, or in the woman’s home.  Private midwives attend births in women’s homes, in birth centres and in hospitals.  They work with doctors to ensure that women and babies receive the very best care possible.
  2. It’s not recommended by their doctor.
    If your doctor is recommending against going with a private midwife, this could possibly be due to a lack of awareness of the ways in which private midwives work.  Your private midwife is able to contact your doctor to explain more about the way that private midwifery care is offered.  Many doctors remain unaware that there are Medicare benefits for care with eligible midwives in private practice, and that eligible midwives in private practice may order all the tests and scans that are needed during pregnancy, birth and in the care of a new baby, as well as ordering the necessary medications relating to pregnancy, birth and postnatal / newborn care.
  3. She doesn’t plan to have a home birth.
    Many women erroneously believe that one would only engage a private midwife for a homebirth.  Certainly, there are midwives who do work exclusively in home births, however many private midwives attend births wherever the woman feels is safest for her, and this may well include birth centres and hospitals.
  4. Only hippies would choose a midwife.
    Private midwifery care is not chosen by any particular group of women.  Women from all walks of life choose private midwifery care.
  5. She worries that private midwives cost too much.
    Cost is certainly an issue for some families.  Medicare benefits are available for services provided by eligible midwives in private practice.  Through my service, there is a range of options available with costs starting from $0 (after claiming back through Medicare).

Learn more about private midwifery care and antenatal shared care.

Birthing statistics

The statistics listed below are for the births I have attended at home, in birth centres and in hospitals.  They reflect the care that has been provided to women in my care and may or may not represent your individual experience.

The number and type of interventions in a birth will depend on many factors:

  • Health and safety factors
  • The decisions that are made by a woman and her care provider
  • A woman’s motivation to achieve the birth she has planned

Statistics:

  • Normal birth (no forceps, vacuum or caesarean): 89%
  • Caesarean 5%
  • Vacuum 3%
  • Forceps 4%
  • VBAC 88%
  • Episiotomy 3%
  • Intact perineum 65%
  • 5% women use an epidural for labour
  • 82% women use no medical forms of pain relief in labour
  • 12% women are induced
  • 50% women have a waterbirth
  • 49% women birth at home
  • 60% women have a physiological third stage
  • 97% babies are exclusively breastfed at 6 weeks discharge
  • Homebirth transfer rate 19%
  • Women considered to be “low risk”: 45%
  • Women considered to be “high risk”: 55%

Statistics for first babies:

  • Normal birth (no forceps, vacuum or caesarean): 90%
  • Caesarean 5%
  • Vacuum 3%
  • Forceps 2%

I feel it is important to compare the measurable benefits of private midwifery care against the statistics for the State as a whole.  These statistics are taken from The NSW Mothers & Babies Report 2010 which are the latest statistics available.

Private midwifery care can increase the chance of a normal birth

  • In NSW, only 58% women birth their babies normally.
  • This rate increases to 89% through this service

Private midwifery care can reduce the need for an epidural

  • 47% of all women used an epidural in labour.  This commonly leads to an assisted delivery, possibly with an episiotomy.
  • The epidural rate is a mere 5% through this service

Private midwifery care can increase a woman’s chance of having a drug-free birth

  • NSW-wide, only 10% women birth their babies drug-free.  90% women use some form of analgesia.
  • Through this service, 82% women use no medical form of pain relief for labour.

Private midwifery care can reduce the need for a caesarean

  • 30% of women in NSW had a caesarean in 2010.
  • 5% women require a caesarean through this service.

26% of first time mothers had caesareans in NSW compared to only 5% of women who chose private midwifery care.

Private midwifery care increase the chance of a successful VBAC

  • In NSW in 2010, only 12% of women who had had a previous caesarean achieved a vaginal birth
  • This increases to 88% when women choose this service

Private midwifery care can increase the chance of  homebirth

  • Only 0.3% babies are born at home in NSW
  • 49% babies are born at home through this service

Choosing a private midwife more than doubles your chance of starting labour without medications

Choosing a private midwife trebles your chance of needing no stitches after birth

Private midwifery care reduces your chance of an episiotomy by 83%

Learn more about private midwifery care and antenatal shared care

Re: Challenges of private midwifery

A midwife colleague of mine in QLD, Barbara Cook of Serene Births, has recently experienced a challenging time with a client.  This was a situation where she offered to support a planned hospital birth, rather than a planned homebirth for a woman when her care needs escalated, and the midwife’s attendance at a homebirth would not meet the standard of care that private midwives offer in Australia.  The client had had a previous caesarean section, and she had found this to be a traumatic event.  In the last paragraph of her blog post, Barbara comments,

“Yet if this woman had been supported well in her first birth with a known midwife she may not have required the caesarean, she now would be in control of her destiny and probably be able to birth at home.”

This is something I wanted to draw on: the choices that women make – sometimes knowingly, but most often unknowingly – in their first pregnancies, and the far-reaching impact that this has on future births.

Many women have a “see how it goes” attitude to their first births, perhaps not realising how important a first birth is in terms of bonding, breastfeeding, attachment, how a woman feels about herself, how she reflects on her birth in years to come, and the choices she makes in subsequent births.

In my practice, I meet a large number of women who feel traumatised by their first births, and I work with them as they journey through their second pregnancies.  The path is usually not smooth, and there are many bumps along the way: fear, uncertainty, doubt, anxiety, tension, sadness, grief, guilt – a whole gamut of emotions.  It is necessary to unpack and process all of these emotions before we can plan for a positive birth.

When women are supported well in their first births with a private midwife, they are highly unlikely to require a caesarean, and they tend to reflect on their births as a wonderful, positive experience.  Whatever comes up in their next pregnancy, they know they can do it (they have done it before), they are considered low risk (previous normal birth is the most likely outcome with a private midwife), and all the care options are available to that woman.  A previous caesarean means that a woman may be viewed as high risk for all of her subsequent pregnancies, with all of the emotional trauma that often accompanies an emergency caesarean when a woman was planning to “see how it goes”, thinking, “it’ll never happen to me”.

Learn more about private midwifery care and antenatal shared care

Which birth choice is right for me?

In the blog post below, I am going to go through a few scenarios or preferences, and suggest a care option that may best suit that woman.

I am going to choose from only four options, even though there are many many different models of care for pregnancy and birth.  The options I am going to choose from are:

Private midwifery care either for a planned homebirth or a planned hospital birth

This is a continuity of carer model whereby a woman is cared for by one midwife from early pregnancy through to birth and the postnatal period until the baby is 6 weeks old.  Where the woman has complications in pregnancy or requires a higher level of care, the midwife is able to refer the woman directly to an obstetrician, or the baby to a paediatrician.  The midwife is also able to order all the necessary tests and scans for the woman.

Private obstetric care for a planned hospital birth

This is a continuity of care model where the woman’s pregnancy care is provided by one obstetrician.  The labour is attended by hospital midwives who are not known to the woman before labour starts, and the birth is attended by the obstetrician with whom the woman has a relationship.  The postnatal care is provided by hospital midwives who are not known to the woman, and the obstetrician provides a final check at 6 weeks postnatal.  This model of care is available in public and private hospitals.

Shared care: either with a GP or a private midwife

This is where a woman attends a private midwife or her GP through her pregnancy (continuity of carer for pregnancy), however the birth is attended by the hospital midwives and obstetricians at the hospital at which the woman is booked, as a public patient.  Once the woman is discharged from hospital, she may again be cared for by her private midwife or GP.  This is a model of care within the public system, where some of the care (ie, the pregnancy care) is provided by a private practitioner.

Standard public hospital care

In this model, a woman is cared for entirely by the public hospital staff.  Generally the woman attends the antenatal clinic for her pregnancy care, where she is seen by the midwives who are on duty that day.  From one visit to the next, the woman may be seen by different midwives.  Some hospitals have a midwife clinic where it is possible for the woman to be seen by the same midwife for most of her pregnancy (antenatal) appointments.  In labour, the woman is cared for by the midwives and obstetricians who are on duty.  These midwives and obstetricians will not be known to the woman ahead of time, and they work in shifts.  Once the baby is born, the woman moves to the postnatal ward where she is again cared for by midwives she has not met before, who work in shifts. This model of care is absolutely free to Medicare card holders, and in Australia, our public system delivers a very safe standard of care.

I want to build a relationship with the midwife who will be caring for me during birth.

This woman would be best to choose private midwifery care. This is the only model where all of your care is provided by one midwife.

I want to feel prepared, informed and confident as I approach my birth.

This woman would best be cared for with private midwifery care, or with private midwifery shared care.  In both models, midwives work very closely with women, through education, preparation, support and lots of time for questions and discussion.

I want basic care: just a quick check and basic education to be safe.

This woman could be cared for with private obstetric care, GP shared care or public hospital care.  It might be best suited to a woman who has had a normal, straightforward birth before, who just wants the basics to be safe.

I want to build a firm relationship with the obstetrician who will be present if something goes wrong.

Private obstetric care might be best here, however there are models of collaborative private midwifery / private obstetric care that might also be helpful.

I am planning an elective caesarean.

Probably private obstetric care will be best.  You will get to know your obstetrician well during your pregnancy, and s/he will attend your caesarean.  This is very reassuring care for women planning a caesarean.

I want to have home visits from my midwife after my baby is born.

Private midwifery care would be best.

I am planning a waterbirth / home birth

Private midwifery care again.  Public hospitals generally don’t provide homebirth services, and waterbirth rates can be quite low.  Private midwives have the highest rates of homebirth and water birth.

I am planning a VBAC

Private midwifery care will give you the best chance of a VBAC (vaginal birth following a previous caesarean).

 Learn more about private midwifery care and antenatal shared care

Physiological (natural) third stage

The third stage of labour begins once the baby has been born, and ends with the birth of the placenta.

Many women are now requesting a physiological (natural) birth of their placenta.  A safe physiological third stage requires oxytocin to be produced by the mother to stimulate the uterus to contract and expel the placenta.  Generally, this requires:

  • Natural birth: without medication to induce or augment (speed up) the labour, without an epidural, without forceps, vacuum or caesarean.  So, in other words, a labour that starts on its own, progresses on its own, where the mother does not use medical forms of pain relief, and where she breathes out or pushes out her baby unassisted by forceps or a vacuum (or caesarean).  This is because these natural processes prime the woman’s body to release lots of oxytocin once the baby is born, to stimulate the uterus to contract to expel the placenta.
  • An environment that supports oxytocin release: this would be a private, dark, calm, warm, quiet environment.  Not the hustle and bustle of a busy delivery suite, but perhaps a water birth setting, home birth setting, or a birth centre setting.
  • No distractions: the mother and baby should be left (but observed by a midwife) for uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact, bonding time and breastfeeding if the baby is ready for this.
  • Leave the cord!  No-one should be fiddling with the cord, checking pulsations or pulling on the cord.  So long as the bleeding is not excessive, the woman should be left and observed.

In time, the placenta will emerge.  Often the woman feels more contractions and an urge to push.  If she is upright (eg squatting, sitting on the toilet, standing or kneeling) the placenta will come on its own, or perhaps with a gentle push.  It can be supported as it emerges and collected into a bowl, ice cream container (sans ice cream) or other receptacle.  The midwife would then check the placenta and membranes to ensure that they are complete.

 Learn more about private midwifery care and antenatal shared care

During a homebirth, do midwives give oxytocin?

Many women who choose a homebirth opt for a physiological / natural third stage. This means that the baby’s cord is not clamped immediately – at least not until the cord pulsations have ceased; the midwife does not pull on the cord, but rather waits for the placenta to be born naturally; and syntocinon (oxytocin) is not given.  Instead, the woman is assisted into an upright position, skin-to-skin with her baby.  This tends to stimulate the release of the hormones that make the uterus contract to expel the placenta.

Midwives do carry syntocinon (oxytocin) at a home birth so that it is ready to use if it is needed for excessive bleeding, but most often it is not needed and instead, we support the natural processes of birthing the placenta.

Learn more about private midwifery care and antenatal shared care

Do obstetricians and midwives attract different clientele?

New research has suggested that women who see themselves as active participants in the birth of their first child, and prefer a collaborative role with their healthcare provider are more likely to opt for a planned home birth with a midwife.

On the other hand, women who perceive their role in the birthing process more passively and are more fearful of birth are more likely to seek obstetric care for a hospital birth.

Women’s answers indicated whether they perceived the Mother’s Role as active or passive, the Provider’s Role as dominant or collaborative, and the Delivery Experience as fearful and painful, or as a positive occurrence.

Women who perceived their role as active, the provider’s role as collaborative, and the delivery of the child as a positive experience, were more likely to prefer midwifery care, birth at home, a vaginal delivery and the avoidance of pain medication.

The more painful and fearful a woman expects her birth to be, the more likely she is to prefer a caesarean to a vaginal birth.

Learn more about private midwifery care and antenatal shared care

What equipment do women need for a homebirth?

A while back, we looked at what equipment midwives bring to a homebirth.  But there are also a few things that women will need to supply for a homebirth.  Most of the items are found around your home, so it’s really just a case of gathering the supplies together.

  • Face washers
  • 3 old bed sheets: one for the bed, one for the couch and one spare
  • 15 old towels (especially if you’re having a waterbirth)
  • 3 large plastic sheets (eg painter’s drop sheets or plastic shower curtains) for covering the couch, bed and for under the birth pool.
  • Plastic supermarket bags for rubbish
  • Plastic container with lid for placenta
  • Large rubbish bin for rubbish
  • Laundry basket for soiled towels
  •  Fan
  •  Candles and matches (optional)
  •  Pillows and bean bags for comfort (optional)
  •  Loose clothes and comfy socks for labour
  • 4 packets maternity pads
  • 2 packets regular pads
  • 1 box of tissues
  • Massage oil
  • Hair bands
  •  Mirror for you to see the birth
  • Music
  • Bendy straws
  •  Baby clothing, jumpsuits, singlets, etc
  • Nappies
  • Cotton wool balls
  • 6 baby wraps
  • Thermometer
  •  Birthing pool
  • Electric pump for pool
  • Hose for filling
  • Connections for hose
  • Mattress or couch to lie on that is close to the pool (cover in plastic)
  • Hand-held colander for “floaties”
  • Camera and/or video recorder
  • Snacks and drinks
  • Present from sibling/s for the new baby

All in all, most of these items are found at home, and your midwife will bring all the medical equipment that is needed.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

Home birth: how messy is it?

Homebirth generally isn’t messy at all.  Many women labour and birth in a birth pool and any bodily fluids are easily contained.  Towels and plastic sheeting come in handy and midwives are very good at leaving the house as it was found.  Plastic bags collect any garbage, the placenta is collected in a bowl or container, and sheets and towels can be washed.  All in all, a homebirth is nowhere near as messy as people think.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

Homebirth transfer rates

We hear a lot about transfer rates, and I am not sure if a transfer rate is a good thing or a bad thing! It seems that high and low rates appeal to different audiences and mean different things to different people.

I have always regarded a transfer rate as a sign of safety.  A 0% transfer rate might be a bit worrying; likewise, a 50%+ transfer rate might also be a bit worrying.  By transfer, we mean a situation where a woman had planned to give birth at home, but ends up birthing in hospital.  A transfer can happen at any stage of the pregnancy or labour.

So what is a woman really asking when she asks her midwife what her midwife’s transfer rate is?  I consider that the woman is really asking, “If I ask you to be my midwife and care for me through my pregnancy and birth, what’s my chance of being transferred to hospital?” and when women ask the same question of several midwives, they are most reassured by the midwife with the lowest transfer rate because they perceive that they have the lowest chance of transferring if they go with the midwife with the lowest transfer rate.

Is it a fair assumption to make, that the midwife’s transfer rate, representing her previous client’s outcomes, are a valid gauge for the current woman’s likelihood of transfer?

Often, I find that transfers can’t be predicted. If we could predict it, we’d recommend a planned hospital birth. Considering transfer rates from this perspective, a midwife’s transfer rate has no bearing on the current woman sitting with her. As well as this, some transfers occur because the woman has requested it – eg a request for transfer for an epidural, but not on the advice of the midwife as the labour is actually progressing very normally. The other situation that can arise is that the midwife foresees problems occurring and makes some recommendations to avert those problems, but the woman considers the recommendations and decides against them. In these cases, again, the midwife’s transfer rate has no bearing on each new client who interviews a midwife.

So what’s a “good” homebirth transfer rate?

Well, many might argue that the lowest transfer rate is the best transfer rate. You’re setting out for a homebirth, right?

I did some scouting around on the lovely internet and found that transfer rates range from 10% through to 50%. The Netherlands has a transfer rate of 52%! This surprised me. In the Netherlands, 86% women start in “primary” care (midwifery care), 28% are transferred in pregnancy and 17% are transferred in labour, leaving 41% women birthing with midwifery care. Of this 41%, 30% occurred at home and 11% occurred in hospital.

The St George hospital homebirth program reported a transfer rate of 37% for its first 100 births and this was in a low-risk clientele (at the start of pregnancy). Their outcomes were excellent, and the satisfaction of the women and midwives using / working in the service was very high.

Private midwives’ transfer rates vary – anywhere from 10% to 40% in some States of Australia as well as overseas. So there’s a wide fluctuation. What can we deduce from these transfer rates?

Well, with the exception of the Netherlands – which has large numbers – we can’t really deduce very much at all. You never can when you’re dealing with small numbers. Private midwives in Australia typically don’t attend more than 20-40 births a year, and some as few as 5 births a year. One transfer in 5 births is 20%, whereas if that same midwife had attended more births without complication, perhaps the transfer rate would have only been 10%.

There are a few things to consider with transfer rates:

  1.  The health needs of the woman at booking
  2.  Safety guidelines
  3. The decisions that the woman makes
  4. The recommendations that the midwife makes

Midwives with low transfer rates might only book the lowest of low-risk women: those who have previously had a vaginal birth without complications.  Midwives with high transfer rates might not be transferring willy-nilly, but might be taking on a higher risk group of women and adopting a wait and see approach – eg, “yes, you have a family history of high blood pressure and you had it with your last pregnancy, but let’s try some preventative measures and see what happens this time”, and continue with homebirth plans. If this woman’s blood pressure went up, she would transfer, contributing to the midwife’s “high” transfer rate. The low risk / low transfer rate midwife might not have accepted this woman for homebirth at all, hence the difference in transfer rates.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

Can you have a private midwife in public hospital in Sydney?

Yes. You can engage a private midwife early in your pregnancy to provide all of your pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.  At this stage, this type of care is available through this service for a birth at Westmead Hospital (or at home).  Private health insurance is not necessary, and you don;t need to reside in the local area.  Enquire here.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

First time mothers and homebirth

What a great choice!  Discuss your situation with your midwife for more advice. Generally, first babies are ideal for home births. Why? Most first births go really well with the care and support of a midwife.  In the hospital system, a first-time Mum stands a 25% chance of having a caesarean, a 25% chance of needing forceps / vacuum, and only a 50% chance of a normal birth.  Compare this with the chance of a normal birth at home with a private midwife (around 90%) and you can see why there is such a benefit to planning to birth your first baby at home.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

FAQs

What are the disadvantages of birthing in hospital?

Most women who birth in hospital do not have the same midwife with them throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal stay. They have different midwives for each antenatal (pregnancy) visit, then another lot of midwives for the birth (sometimes 3-4, depending on how long the woman is in delivery suite and whether the midwife has a student midwife working with her), followed by another group of midwives who work in shifts in postnatal. The lack of continuity means that the woman does not have the opportunity to really develop a deep sense of trust with her own midwife, something that is intrinsic to positive and safe birthing experiences.  The other issues are around the potential for things to “fall through the cracks” and the need to repeat yourself at every visit.

When women have their own midwife with them, they have the full range of options open to them and they are fully informed and able to make their own decisions around pregnancy and birth care.  The continuity of care that this provides is central to a safe birth.

Birthing option?

To learn more about pregnancy and birth care options, why not book an appointment?  There is no cost with a Medicare card.

Can I have an epidural with a midwife?

Absolutely!  Although many women find that they don’t need one when they’re cared for by the same midwife and well supported in labour. In my practice, only 5% women need an epidural in labour, and 80% women birth their babies with no pain relief at all.  However, epidurals are a good option for some women in some labours.

Can midwives administer oxytocin at a home birth?

Yes, to manage excessive bleeding after the baby is born, but it cannot be used to induce or augment the labour. Those interventions are attended in the hospital as they carry risks to the baby. Midwives routinely carry oxytocics to births in case they are needed.

Does having gestational diabetes mean a C-section?

This would be a good one to ask your care provider. Generally speaking, gestational diabetes does not automatically mean having a caesarean.

Private midwife public hospital Sydney?

Yes, it is possible to take your own midwife with you in a public hospital. This service provides this as an option. Women book with their private midwife and receive all of their pregnancy care from their midwife, including pregnancy, birth and postnatal care for 6 weeks.

Private midwives in Sydney’s east?

Yes, this service provides private midwifery services in the eastern suburbs.

Water birth private hospital Sydney?

None of the private hospitals in Sydney allow waterbirth. Waterbirth is the norm in a homebirth and may be an option in a public hospital.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

Homebirth: What to expect

Homebirth care is always individualised to the needs of the woman and family.  The following information can help you to understand what may happen in labour, to give you a sense of your options and lessen any surprises. When you birth at home, you can expect to:

- Wear whatever you like in labour
- Have vaginal examinations when / if you want them. Your midwife may suggest an examination if she feels it is needed, which is not very often as we know that babies are born whether vaginal examinations are performed or not and many women prefer to avoid them wherever possible.
- To have your temperature, blood pressure and pulse taken when it is necessary to do so – sometimes this is not done at all
- Have your baby’s heart beat listened to with a hand-held doppler that allows you to remain in the bath or shower.
- If additional fluids are needed, you can expect your midwife to offer you lots of drinks – this will also help to keep up your energy levels. In fact, your midwife will probably offer food and fluids regularly throughout your labour anyway.
- We don’t use ID bands at home. Not for Mum, not for baby. No chance of anyone getting lost, everyone knows who’s who, and no mother is handed the wrong baby!
- Your waters are very unlikely to be broken at home.
- You can expect to give birth in the position that’s most comfortable to you at the time. For many women, this is kneeling (so you can catch your own baby) or all fours (and your partner can catch the baby).
- Waterbirth is a common birth method at home.
- While “pain relief” is not offered, your midwife will make suggestions to assist your level of comfort such as position changes, hot packs, bath, shower, massage and so on.
- You will find that your body will push instinctively when the time’s right.
- Many women will not tear and episiotomy is very rare at home.
- Placentas usually come of their own accord, in their own time provided that the blood loss is not excessive.
- Your baby’s cord will be cut after the placenta is born, and some women prefer to leave it intact and have a lotus birth.
- There is no separation of mother and baby.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

Water birth

Many women are opting for waterbirth, and fortunately some of our maternity units are now supporting waterbirth, owing in part to the NSW Health Towards Normal Birth Policy.

Why are more women choosing waterbirth?

  1. Pain relief – water is great at assisting with the sensations of labour.  I have heard women who have had an epidural with their first baby and a waterbirth with their second, say that they much prefer their waterbirth.
  2. Pain relief without adverse effects.  There are no side effects of a water birth.
  3. A gentle birth for baby.  The baby goes from a warm, fluid environment in the uterus, to a warm, fluid environment in the bath, before coming into air.  Waterborn babies tend to be calmer and more relaxed at birth, and often do not cry.
  4. Softening of the perineum can help protect it from tears and episiotomy.
  5. Some evidence has suggested that women who labour in the bath tend to have shorter labours than women who labour out of the bath.

Safe waterbirth

Water birth is safe with a midwife who is skilled at facilitating water birth. It is important to ensure that the practical aspects are taken care of: you will need more towels for a water birth, both for you and for baby.  If you are having a home waterbirth, I usually recommend that women have a plastic sheet under the birth pool and then surround the pool with towels.  In this way, you can protect carpet and flooring as you step in and out of the pool.

The temperature of the pool should be maintained at body temperature so that the baby doesn’t enter water that is too hot or too cold, and so that the woman’s temperature is maintained.

Hydration is important in the pool, and dehydration tends to be more common amongst women who are labouring in the birth pool.  Your midwife will check your temperature more frequently if you are in the pool, and will offer fluids between every contraction.

Learn more about private midwifery care and shared care.

How do midwives monitor the baby’s heart beat in labour at a homebirth?

Midwives monitor a baby’s heart beat in a home birth, as well as ensuring the health of the woman giving birth.  The usual method of monitoring a baby at a homebirth is for the midwife to use a doppler.  This portable and light-weight piece of equipment is water-proof, so the woman can be in any position and also in the bath or shower while it is in use.

Current guidelines recommend that a baby’s heart beat be listened to every 15 minutes in the first stage of labour, and after every contraction during the second stage of labour.

Some women are keen to avoid ultrasound, and the hand-held doppler does use ultrasound.  in lieu of this, the midwife can use a pinnards stethoscope, however this can only be used on land, so it would require the woman to leave the bath or shower so that the midwife could check on the baby’s wellbeing.

If the midwife detected anything untoward in the baby’s heartbeat at home, s/he would arrange for the women to be transferred to the hospital where a CTG monitor could be used to give more information abut the health of the baby.  This is the same process as what a birth centre midwife would employ.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Homebirth – until 2015

On August 10, the Standing Council on Health agreed to extend the current insurance exception until July 2013.

Currently, midwives must have insurance that covers all aspects of their practice.  For private midwives, insurance is available for pregnancy and postnatal care, but not for homebirth.  There is an exemption to the requirement for insurance for a homebirth, and this was due to run out in July 2013.  With no insurance product on offer, this would mean that private midwives would need to cease providing private homebirth care to women after July 2013.

Following the decision to extend the exemption, private midwives will be able to continue to provide homebirth care to women until July 2015.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Why is a low-risk woman safer giving birth at home?

Research supports the notion that a low-risk woman is safer giving birth at home, rather than in hospital.  This sounds counter-intuitive, given all the machines that go ping in the hospital, as well as the proximity to theatres and intensive care if those facilities are needed.  Could it be that hospital birth actually creates some risks that make it a riskier birth place for a low-risk woman?

A planned hospital birth sometimes indicates that the woman is fearful of something going wrong, and therefore she prefers to be in a hospital environment.  Fear in itself can increase the amount of adrenaline that circulates in a woman’s body.  This can prevent labour from starting, or result in a slow labour if it begins naturally.

Hospitals are often unfamiliar environments for women, where they are usually cared for by midwives and obstetricians they have not met before, rotating through different shifts, with unfamiliar sounds and no comforts of home.

All of this can increase the amount of pain a woman feels, and therefore increase the chance that she will request pain relief.

It is also possible that hospital policy / practice will dictate that the woman will have a short period of continuous monitoring of the baby on arrival to the delivery suite.  This will usually mean limited movement for a short period of time, increased pain and a greater likelihood that the monitor will remain on for the duration of the labour.

Continuous monitoring increases pain due to the woman’s inability to move freely without disrupting the monitoring.  Some hospitals provide a form of monitoring that means that the woman can mobilise freely and use the bath or the shower, but these are not yet commonplace.

Assuming the woman uses pain relief (and we know that requests for pain relief are more common in women planning a hospital birth compared to women planning a homebirth), epidurals can result in a slower labour and an inability to feel to push.  This can mean that forceps or a vacuum is needed to deliver the baby.  Sometimes an episiotomy is made at the same time.  And sometimes all of this intervention increases the chance of a woman losing too much blood after the birth.

So it would seem that there is some risk in birthing in hospital that is not present when birthing at home.  But is this the end of the story?  We know that when women are supported by their own midwife, who has worked with them throughout the pregnancy, lower rates of interventions and complications occur.  So the moral of the story is that if you’re a low-risk woman, and you’d prefer to give birth in hospital, engage a midwife to care for you.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Why is choosing a care provider one of the most important pregnancy decisions you will make?

A woman’s choice of care provider for pregnancy and birth is one of the most important decisions she will make. This major decision is the major influence on how her birth will go: whether it will be caesarean, VBAC, epidural or natural birth.

Some things to consider when deciding on a care provider are:

• What sort of relationship would you like to have with your care provider? Are you merely looking for physical check ups in pregnancy and someone to turn up for the last few minutes of the birth? Are you wanting to be cared for by strangers who do not know you or your wishes for birth / would you like to feel nurtured? Would you like to know the person who will assist you in birth?
• How much information do you expect to receive? Are you happy with “It’s normal” in response to your questions, or do you need more information and a better understanding of your situation and progress and health?
• Do you wish to be actively involved in the decisions made about your care or are you happy to leave all decision-making up to others?
• Are you well and healthy? The majority of women are. If this is the case for you, your care provider could be a midwife or an obstetrician. If you have significant health issues, an obstetrician might be a better option.

It may take some time and energy to find the right care provider for your pregnancy and birth. It is very helpful to interview several midwives and obstetricians before deciding on the one that is right for you. This is a relationship that is worth investing in, and it’s important to make the right decision. Be prepared to pay for initial consultations with health professionals and consider this money well-spent. Everyone’s individual and a poor choice of care provider (for your needs) can have far-reaching effects.

What about place of birth?

There are three options for place of birth: home, birth centre and hospital. Midwifery care is available at all three locations. Obstetricians generally work only in hospitals, however a few will attend birth centre births. Knowing where you would like to birth your baby can help you in choosing a care provider.

What should I look out for when I am interviewing care providers?

One of the most important issues to consider really doesn’t need much consideration at all. How do you feel about your care provider at the end of the initial consultation? It’s a gut feel. You can trust your gut.

You will want to ask your care provider about his/her practices to ensure that their practices are consistent with what you’re wanting for your pregnancy and birth. If waterbirth is important to you, you need to find a place of birth and care provider who can provide this. It’s best to find this out at the initial consultation stage rather than at 38 weeks.

You will also want to explore your care provider’s philosophy on pregnancy and birth to ensure that there is a match with your own.

Are there any poor reasons for choosing a care provider?

Yes! And I hear them very often. It is not wise to choose a care provider because:
• They are close to your home / office
• Your mother used them
• You feel you don’t have any other choices (there are always choices; it’s not a question of resources, it’s a question of resourcefulness)
• They are female / they are male. Plenty of female obstetricians are more interventionist than male obstetricians.
• Your GP recommended them (unless you are sure of the basis for that recommendation)
• They are cheap
• They do an ultrasound at every visit
• They delivered you
• It would offend Aunt Bessie if you didn’t go to Dr X
• Although you don’t like the person, you’re sure they’ll be fine on the day (your gut is always right)

Can I change my care provider? I’m already 39 weeks pregnant!

It’s never too late to change. It’s uncertain and there are moments of awkwardness but it’s of most importance that you feel right about the care provider you have chosen. I have many women who come to me after months with an obstetrician or another midwife. As time goes on, you will learn more about your needs and about the care provider you have chosen. If you have reason to believe that the care provider who was once right for you, is no longer, then it’s time to find someone who will better meet your needs. The first step, before changing, is to talk to your care provider. Perhaps there’s a misunderstanding that can easily be cleared up. Both of you have an interest in maintaining the relationship and I’m not a fan of breaking relationships unnecessarily. So talk to your care provider first. Let them know what’s important to you and why. Ask them to help you achieve whatever it is you’re hoping to achieve. If, after going through this process the two of you can’t see eye to eye, it’s time to find someone else.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Homebirth transfer rates: cause for concern?

What is a woman really asking when she asks her midwife what the midwife’s transfer rate is?

Women often interview several private midwives when they are choosing the right midwife for their needs. Women will ask many questions of their prospective midwife, and one of the more common questions is, “What is your transfer rate?” meaning, “what percentage of the women who book with you for homebirth, end up transferring to hospital?”

On the surface, this seems like a fair question. But what is the woman really asking? I consider that the woman is really asking, “If I book with you, what’s my chance of being transferred?” and when women ask the same question of several midwives, they are most reassured by the midwife with the lowest transfer rate because they perceive that they have the lowest chance of transferring if they go with the midwife with the lowest transfer rate.

Is it a fair assumption to make, that the midwife’s transfer rate, representing her previous client’s outcomes, are a valid guage for the current woman’s likelihood of transfer? Often I find that transfers can’t be predicted at the time a woman books-in for care. If we could predict it, we’d recommend a planned hospital birth. Considering transfer rates from this perspective, a midwife’s transfer rate has no bearing on the current woman sitting with her. As well as this, some transfers occur because the woman has requested it – eg a request for transfer for an epidural, but not on the advice of the midwife as the labour is actually progressing very normally. The other situation that can arise is that the midwife forsees problems occurring and makes some recommendations to avert those problems, but the woman considers the recommendations and declines to follow them. In these cases, again, the midwife’s transfer rate has no bearing on each new client who interviews a midwife.

What’s a “good” homebirth transfer rate?

Well, many might argue that the lowest transfer rate is the best transfer rate. You’re setting out for a homebirth, right? So why go to the midwife with a “high” transfer rate?

I did some scouting around on the internet and found that transfer rates range from 10% through to 50%. The Netherlands has a transfer rate of 52%! This surprised me. In the Netherlands, 86% women start in “primary” care (midwifery care), 28% are transferred in pregnancy and 17% are transferred in labour, leaving 41% women birthing with midwifery care. Of this 41%, 30% occurred at home and 11% occurred in hospital.

The St George hospital homebirth program reported a transfer rate of 37% for its first 100 births and this was in a low-risk clientele (at the start of pregnancy). Their outcomes were excellent, however and the satisfaction of the women and midwives using / working in the service was very high.

Private midwives’ transfer rates vary – anywhere from 10% to 40% in some States of Australia as well as overseas. So there’s a wide fluctuation. What can we deduce from these transfer rates?

Well, with the exception of the Netherlands – which has large numbers – we can’t really deduce very much at all. You never can when you’re dealing with small numbers. Private midwives in Australia typically don’t attend more than 25-30 births a year, and some as few as 5 births a year. One transfer in 5 births is 20%, whereas if that same midwife had attended more births without complication, perhaps the transfer rate would have only been 10%.

There are a couple of things to consider with high and low transfer rates:
1. The risk status of the women at booking
2. The midwife’s adherence to safety and risk management guidelines and her outcomes.

The midwife with the lowest transfer rate might simply have a low transfer rate because she only attends very low risk women: women who have birthed without complication before, who have no health history and who have no problems in their current pregnancy.

The midwife with the high transfer rate might not be transferring willy-nilly, she might just be taking on a higher risk group of women and adopting a wait and see approach – eg, “yes, you have a family history of high blood pressure and you’ve had it with every pregnancy thus far, but let’s try some preventative measures and see what happens this time”, and continue with homebirth plans. If this woman’s blood pressure went up, she would have been transferred, contributing to the midwife’s “high” transfer rate. The low risk / low transfer rate midwife might not have accepted this woman for homebirth at all, hence the difference in transfer rates.

The other thing to consider with transfer rates is the midwife’s commitment to safety and risk management. Some midwives may have low transfer rates because the decision to transfer is prolonged, or because risk factors are denied. Is it good to have a low transfer rate if women or babies have been compromised?

But getting back to the question, “If I book with you, what’s my chance of being transferred?”, this question is impossible to answer.
1. We can’t tell the future. Family history and health history might shine some light on possible issues for the pregnancy, but not necessarily. We can’t predict all the paths a pregnancy can follow.
2. A woman’s determination to move towards – and remain in – a state of health and wellness is a life-long journey that pre-dates the pregnancy.
3. Although midwives will make recommendations with the aim of homebirth in mind, it is the woman’s right to consider the advice and decline it. Declining a midwife’s advice may well mean that a transfer will become necessary.
4. Midwives’ statistics are only relevant to her past clients, not the client sitting with her currently.
5. For many midwives, the goal is really safety: safety for woman and baby. We strive to achieve the safest birth in the setting that can best meet the needs of our client.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Planning a homebirth vs having a homebirth

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Is it just semantics? “I’m having a homebirth” versus, “I’m planning a homebirth”? I often wonder why more women don’t plan homebirths. Planning a homebirth doesn’t rule out hospital as an option if it’s needed or desired. Planning a homebirth keeps all options open and allows women to make the decision about place of birth towards the end of the pregnancy or even in labour.

Sometimes I’m concerned when I hear, “I’m having a homebirth”. The same way I’m concerned if I hear, “I’m having an epidural / induction / waterbirth” or whatever. Yes, these are our plans, but we never really know what’s going to happen until the time.

There is a transfer rate associated with homebirth and this reflects safe practice and respect for women’s decisions. Bearing that in mind, it’s wiser to say, “I’m planning a homebirth” rather than, “I’m having a homebirth”.

Also, consider the reactions from family and friends when they hear these words. When we “plan” a homebirth, friends and family are put at ease. Plans can change if they need to. The common response, “Homebirth?!?! Isn’t that … dangerous??” is no longer needed because plans can change if risks emerge. Sometimes when people hear, “I’m having a homebirth”, they don’t understand that if hospital is needed, we go. The common questions like, “what if you need a caesarean?” “what if you need an epidural?” are valid when we frame it as “having” a homebirth because these interventions are not available at home. But when homebirth is “planned”, those questions are no longer necessary: plans can change.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Why Birth at Home?

Homebirth provides a familiar and safe environment for birthing. This helps to keep stress hormones low, and positive birth hormones high, and can therefore make the birth easier and less painful. Women choose a homebirth because they believe in their body’s ability to birth, wish to involve their partner and other children more, or prefer to reduce the chance of intervention in their labour. And becuase let’s face it: pregnancy and birth are normal, healthy and natural experiences. We don’t go to hospital to experience other normal, healthy and natural bodily experiences such as food digestion, urination, menstruation, defecation …. we trust that our bodies work, and that these processes work too.

Women choose homebirth to:
Experience fewer complications in labour
Reduce the need for interventions
Use less pain medication
Remain in comfortable and familiar surroundings
Have a baby who has fewer problems after the birth
Increase their success with breastfeeding
Improve bonding with their baby
Provide a gentle birth for their baby
Involve other siblings and family
Have choice and control
Reduce birth trauma
Receive care from the same midwife right the way through
Benefit from having more choices available
Have a great birth!

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Is Homebirth Right for me?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

For most women, home birth is a safe and responsible decision. Homebirth is possible for women who:

Are having their first babies
Are having their second, third or subsequent babies
Have had a previous traumatic birth
Had a very fast birth last time
Prefer a more natural experience
Are healthy

Why choose homebirth?
Some women find that having their baby in the comfort of their home provides a supporting environment.

This helps to keep stress hormones low, and positive birth hormones high, making the birth easier and less painful.

Other women homebirth because they believe in their body’s ability to birth, wish to involve their partner and other children, or prefer to reduce the chance of intervention in their labour.

A number of different research studies have looked into the safety of homebirth – all reliable research has found that for healthy women, homebirth is a safe option.

Keeping Homebirth Safe
A common question I am asked is, “What if something goes wrong?” Private midwives take several precautions to keep home birth safe. This includes things such as:

Screening women carefully so that only low-risk, healthy women birth at home
Careful monitoring during pregnancy and labour to ensure that any possible risks are detected early, allowing time for transfer to hospital or consultation with obstetric staff
Building a relationship with the woman that is based on mutual trust and respect. This is central to an effective relationship between woman and midwife.

Midwives who birth with women at home are educated and experienced to assess the wellbeing of mother and baby throughout pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, birth and the postnatal / neonatal period. Midwives use the ACMI Guidelines for Referral and Consultation to support clinical decision-making in consultation with the client. Of course, with a homebirth, you have the right to make your own informed decisions about your care and your decisions are respected.

The Cost of Homebirth
Some people believe that private / independent midwifery care is expensive. I have prepared the following table to explain how the services are broken down. Home birth services are very comprehensive, and home birth midwives spend many hours with women and their families, building a strong relationship during the pregnancy that carries through to the birth and beyond. Typical home birth services consume a whopping 72 hours of a midwife’s time!

PLUS
On-call – for the duration of the pregnancy: you need to be available for whatever might come up
Research
Administrative tasks
Professional consultation with other professionals on the client’s behalf

As you can see, the service provided by a private midwife is comprehensive and does not compare easily with other maternity services in terms of continuity of care, hours of contact, follow-up and availability. When you choose a home birth with an independent midwife, you are choosing gold standard service.

As you can understand, when midwives provide this level of service, it is impossible to book more than two or three clients each month.

Some women ask me whether I will provide reduced services such as no postnatal care, one or two antenatal visits, a late booking, and so on, in order to reduce the cost. I prefer to provide a comprehensive service and the women who book with me see the value in this approach. A home birth is an investment in you and your baby, afterall. And you deserve the very best.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What are the benefits of a water birth?

It is true that very few women will have a waterbirth for one baby and then choose a land birth for the subsequent baby, however many women will have a land birth with one baby and then opt for a waterbirth the next time. Occasionally a woman will choose a homebirth specifically so that she can experience a waterbirth, perhaps because her local hospital cannot support her in this.

Waterbirth is an effective way for a woman to manage the sensations of labour.

Waterbirth often results in fewer perineal tears because the water has a softening effect on the perineum.

Waterbirth also helps a woman to be more active in her labour and birth because it helps with a sensation of weighlessness.

Babies who are born in water are often calmer than babies who are born on land.

Because warm water promotes good circulation and oxygenation to the uterine muscles, a baby is less likely to suffer from a lack of oxygen which can lead to fetal distress.

Labouring in water has also been shown to lower a woman’s blood pressure and assist with dilation of the cervix in a labour that is considered to be “slow”.

In my practice, about 50% women birth their babies in water.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What is a water birth?

A water birth is when a woman gives birth to a baby when submerged in water (usually in a birth pool or large bath). A midwife should always be present, the same with every birth.

With proper care and attention, a water birth is a safe way to birth a baby, and it has important benefits for mothers and babies.

Soap, essential oils and salt should not be added to the water. Ordinary tap water is fine. Generally, when a woman is birthing in a birth pool, she will need an electric pump to pump up the pool, a hose to fill it with water, a net for any “floaties” and a pool liner (if desired).

The water temperature should be warm, at around 35-37 degrees.

Waterbirths may be possible in some hospitals, and they are always possible at home if you have a bath that is large enough to birth in, or a birth pool.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What are your practice statistics?

It is a question I am often asked, and rightly so. If a woman would like to have a natural birth, she ought to choose a care provider who has a high rate of natural birth.

My birthing statistics are listed below.

The statistics listed below are for the births I have attended at home, in birth centres and in hospitals. They reflect the care that has been provided to women in my care and may or may not represent your individual experience.

The number and type of interventions in a birth will depend on many factors:

Health and safety issues
The decisions that are made by a woman and her care provider
A woman’s motivation to achieve the birth she has planned

Statistics:

Normal birth (no forceps, vacuum or caesarean): 87%
Caesarean 6%
Vacuum 3%
Forceps 4%
VBAC 86%
Episiotomy 3%
Intact perineum 63%
6% women use an epidural for labour
79% women use no medical forms of pain relief in labour
10% women are induced

Statistics for first babies:

Normal birth (no forceps, vacuum or caesarean): 90%
Caesarean 3%
Vacuum 4%
Forceps 3%

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

No place like home for birth

Link

FORMER Play School presenter Noni Hazlehurst said it was sad that more women who had low-risk pregnancies were not encouraged to have a home birth.

Noni Hazlehurst is among several women who have spoken in favour of homebirthing in the upcoming documentary ‘The Face of Birth’

She described it as a natural, empowering and beneficial experience.

Hazlehurst, who had two home births, said some of her friends were alarmed by her decision, but she said it was a humbling experience.

A DVD to premiere in Melbourne tomorrow features Victorian, national and international medical experts, midwives and academics advocating a woman’s right to choose their place of birth.

It comes after the tragic death of a Melbourne woman who died in hospital the day after her home birth.

Melbourne film-maker and actor Kate Gorman, who gave birth at home, said the film highlighted the unspoken aspects of the debate.

She said they were not saying that all women should have a home birth.

In the DVD, titled The Face of Birth, Hazlehurst says she decided to have home births with qualified midwives because she had heard horror stories about medical interventions in hospital.

She said her mother told her that in the UK only pregnant women with complications had babies in hospitals.

Hazlehurst said her son’s birth was unforgettable.

“It is a much more peaceful and empowering experience if you can have a natural birth in your own environment,” …

She said the hospital was on standby and the reward was two beautiful and healthy children.

Hazlehurst said there was a place for medical intervention, but if women with a low-risk pregnancy wanted to have a home birth they should not be frightened out of it …

Noni touches on the safety aspects of home birth: low-risk women, attended by a midwife, and with hospital back-up. Under these conditions, homebirth is a safe and amazing experience for mother and baby.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Birth review not acted on

Link

One-third of the recommendations from a review into the safety of homebirths have not been acted on, including calls for a more robust investigation of baby deaths …

The report blames limited resources for the lack of progress on meeting the 2008 review’s 24 recommendations, with no evidence of progress in eight of them.

The Health Department ordered the audit a year ago, after its expert committee … found the stillbirth rate in homebirths was four times higher than that of hospital births …

It’s not uncommon to find that under-resourcing impacts the adoption of review findings, but it is unfortunate for homebirth that this is the case. Unfortunately, recent events in WA, VIC and SA have painted an unpleasant image of homebirth that is not deserved, and when review findings go unacted on, we are denied the opportunity of improving the public (media) perception of homebirth. The reality is that low-risk, midwife-attended homebirth, with good back-up plans, medical support and a supportive health system, is a very safe, healthy and satisfying way to birth a baby. Recent research from the UK supports the idea that low-risk women who have previously birthed their babies vaginally are actually safer birthing at home than in a hospital or birth centre stetting.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Home births get backing from Dannii Minogue

Link

DANNII Minogue would not hesitate to try to have a home birth again.

… Minogue remains a staunch defender of the practice that continues to be a hot topic of debate among many mothers.

Minogue tried to give birth to her son … at … home … but, after labouring for several hours, was transferred to the hospital on the advice of her midwife.

“I don’t care what anyone else says about having a home birth, that felt right for me,” she said. “It’s about your body and what you feel comfortable with” …

Homebirth is a really special and wonderful way to bring a baby into the world. Even if a transfer is needed, most women would agree with Dannii that the model of care that is provided means that a transfer can be a physically and emotionally safe experience.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Midwives Make Home Births Safer for Babies

Link

Babies born at home are at increased risk for health problems immediately after birth compared with babies born in hospitals … However, a midwife may make a difference in the health of babies born at home …

… babies born at home were more likely to have a neonatal seizure and low Apgar scores at five minutes after birth … But when a … midwife was present, it seems babies born at home may fare as well as those born in hospitals …

… Home births are known to be associated with fewer obstetric interventions …

… findings are based on an analysis of more than 2 million births in the United States in 2008. Of these, 12,433 (or 0.54 percent) were home births …

It is helpful to have studies that can demonstrate the value of midwifery care in a home birth. Homebirth often gets a back rap in the media, however often the media confuses unattended homebirths with midwife-attended homebirth.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Maternal Death following a Homebirth

Much has been published recently about the very unfortunate death of a mother following a homebirth with private midwives. No details have been released that could allow us to form an opinion that this woman’s death was “because” she birthed at home, and it is also possible that an appropriate and timely transfer was arranged and that she died of complications that arose in hospital. I am not privy to any more details than what can be found in the local press. Even though at this stage, no-one really knows how or why Caroline died, many people have taken the opportunity to make assumptions as to the exact cause of death, and more so, they are certain that her death would have been preventable and hence avoidable had she birthed in hospital. I am astounded that anyone could make such assumptions – and that the media would publish such opinions – when they are not grounded in fact.

So, what do we know?

Maternal mortality includes deaths in women up to a year after giving birth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy. The maternal mortality rate in Australia varies between about 8.4 and 11.1 per 100,000.

Direct maternal deaths are those that result from obstetric complications of pregnancy. This includes such things as amniotic fluid embolism, haemorrhage, infection and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

As well as direct maternal deaths, there are also indirect maternal deaths, and these are deaths that result from pre-existing disease which maybe aggravated by pregnancy or birth. This can include such things as heart disease, psychiatric causes, epilepsy and so on.

It has been suggested that since 1999, there has only been one other woman who has died following a homebirth attended by a midwife. The AIHW report for 1997-99 also describes another maternal death following a homebirth, however that was an unattended homebirth (ie, the woman had given birth at home without a midwife present). Both women died of postpartum haemorrhages.

The question we need to ask, is whether these reports of maternal death following homebirth reach statistical significance. In statistics, a result is statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It is possible that the two maternal deaths following midwife-attended home births are the only deaths we will have for the next 50-odd years; or it could be that in the next few years, we will have far more maternal deaths following midwife-attended homebirths. Certainly, other countries do not report an increased maternal mortality rate for women birthing at home with a midwife.

All of this said, it is incumbent on every midwife who attends homebirths to advise women of the increased risk of death and serious injury should a major complication occur at home. This is related to the lack of resources, staff and facilities at home and the time and distance needed to transfer to hospital in an urgent situation. This, however, is also the case in a smaller public or private hospital, where if something should go horribly wrong, those facilities would also not have the immediate capability to provide the best possible assistance.

In the event of major complications, a team effort is really needed: midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetist, operating theatre, intensive care unit, medications, IV lines, equipment for monitoring the heart and respiration and blood pressure, ultrasound imaging and so on. However, it also needs to be said that this would only be in very rare and exceptional circumstances that can mostly be known in advance. We also know that serious complications that can result in death are more likely when women have had interventions in labour and birth.

This is why women are encouraged to birth in hospital if their medical history suggests that they are at a higher risk of life-threatening complications in birth (eg epilepsy, clotting disorders, high blood pressure, and so on), and it also why midwives are reluctant to attend any form of intervention in the home setting. At the slightest hint of a complication, a responsible midwife will advise her client to transfer to hospital in the interests of safety.

All of this said (and done), low risk does not mean no risk. A perfectly healthy, low-risk woman experiencing a normal pregnancy and a normal labour can still experience a massive postpartum hemorrhage that cannot be effectively managed by the equipment available at a home birth. It also could not be managed at a small private or public hospital where theatre staff, anaesthetists, monitoring equipment etc might not be readily available. It is important for women to understand that while this is highly unlikely to ever happen, should it happen, it does increase the risk of death or serious injury (eg brain damage). It is a difficult task counselling women in very rare but very serious possibilities, and birthing women need to feel free to make the best decisions for them and their families, in the full knowledge of all possibilities. Midwives should not withhold this information from women as it is materially significant to their decisions about place of birth.

Certainly, the media takes the view that all homebirth deaths could be prevented by having those women birth in hospital. This may be true. Or maybe not. Private midwives examine the deaths of women in hospitals, and often comment that those deaths might have been preventable had those women birthed at home or with a private midwife in hospital. Cases of women dying following unnecessary caesareans. Women suiciding in the early postnatal period with no support in caring for their baby and ineffective antenatal planning for the possibility of postnatal depression. Women dying of postpartum haemorrhage following induced labour (induction is a risk for PPH) for hypertension: it might surprise you to know that rates of high blood pressure are very low amongst women cared for by private midwives. A PPH in a woman who had had a caesarean for her third baby – a breech baby: this woman could very easily have proceeded with a vaginal birth, especially given that it was her third baby. Avoidance of the caesarean might have meant no PPH and saved her life. These are the sorts of cases where hospital doesn’t “save” women from death: it might be seen, in some cases to actually cause the death, however the media will never report on this.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Homebirth: the right choice, naturally

Link

WHEN Kate Randell and Chris Lockyer welcomed baby Mali, it happened in their comfortable family home.

The couple decided to have a homebirth because Ms Randell’s pregnancy was low-risk and, after nine years’ experience as a midwife, she knew she would feel more natural and relaxed in her own house.

… the couple were prepared with a homebirthing kit, including oxygen and advanced medical supplies, had a registered midwife on hand and were willing to go to hospital if there were any complications.

She said she would never have considered a home birth if she was having twins or the pregnancy was high-risk.

“With any high-risk pregnancy the best place is in a hospital, but with a low-risk, normal, healthy pregnancy and a labour where everything is going OK – it should be whatever the parents feel most comfortable with,” …

… “Most people don’t realise that all birth has risk and that babies die in hospital, too, not just at home,” …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

More Women Choosing To Have Their Babies At Home

Link

Despite a decrease in home births between 1990 and 2004, the number of home births actually increased between 2004 and 2009 by 29%, an upturn of 0.56% in 2004, to 0.72% in 2009. In 2009, a total of 29,650 home births were reported in the United States. This is the most home births reported since researchers began analyzing data on this topic in 1989 …

Benefits Of Home Births

More private, less chaotic
The woman is surrounded by the comforts of her own home
Fewer people involved
Lower chance of a C-section
Cheaper
More personal experience

Midwives Are Present At Most Home Births
62% of home births reported in 2009 occurred in the presence of midwives, while only 7% of hospital births had a midwife present. 19% of home births had a certified nurse present, and 43% of home births were supervised by other types of midwives, for example, direct-entry midwives or certified professional midwives. The study reports that a mere 5% of home births had taken place in the presence of doctors, probably because the majority of them occurred without notice. 92% of hospital births had doctors present.

33% of home births were supervised by someone other than a doctor or midwife. For example, family members may have helped …

Taking A Look Back
The way women choose to deliver their babies has drastically changed in the last 100 years:

In 1900, the majority of births took place outside of a hospital – very few women had their babies at a place other than their own homes.
During 1940, only 44% of women chose to have their babies at home
By 1969, 1% of women were having their babies at home. (These figures remained the same into the 1980s)

The move from homebirth to hospital birth occurred with no rigorous studies of either birth place. Recent research has now concluded that for a healthy, low-risk woman, a homebirth is no more dangerous to her or the baby, than a hospital birth. It is only when complications are added to the mix, that we start to see that home birth is less safe than hospital birth. Research is also conclusive that if we take a healthy, low-risk woman and assist her to birth at home, she will experience less intervention and more satisfaction with her birth experience, compared to birthing in hospital. Homebirths are making an evidence-based comeback!

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

An amazing homebirth story

Isabel is an amazing, strong woman who came to me for pregnancy care. She had planned to move overseas, and as you’ll read, her pregnancy came as a surprise. She planned a homebirth with a midwife overseas – but the story has a twist in it! We went about the pregnancy, preparing thoroughly for an active, natural and drug-free birth. I was thrilled to receive Isabel’s birth story, and she has kindly agreed to share it here.

Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home. Now it is my turn to write the story I have been so looking forward to… I hope I help inspire another mum-to-be to have the great confidence in her own ability and her body’s ability to birth her baby safely and naturally…love Isabel xx

Our beautiful birth story of baby Zachary by Isabel and Jed

It started in mid-April when I noticed an unusual change in my body. I pee-ed my pants when I sneezed. Even though I have a very weak bladder control and recurrent cystitis I had never done that before. I decided to get a urine test and after 4 weak positives I decided the product was defective and I needed to go see a real doctor tomorrow.
Half way through a busy day at work as a Veterinarian, caring for animals, it hit me that I might be pregnant and that we weren’t really ready for this big change in our lives. I broke down and cried. I left work early to go see the doctor. Jed met me at the clinic and we saw the doctor together. The doctor promptly told me, “My Dear, there isn’t such a thing as false positive results. Only false negative are possible. You ARE pregnant!”

I guess at that point both Jed and I had a lot of conflicting feelings. We had only just gotten married less than a month ago. We had a wedding dinner to attend in Malaysia followed by a honeymoon which required us to trek over 4000km up a mountain. At the same time it was such a big surprise and blessing to know that we were able to have a baby. We both set about sorting through our feelings and thoughts for a couple of weeks before letting the rest of the family and friends know about it.

It was a smooth pregnancy and we had amazing help and support from friends and family. We learnt so much from our lovely midwife, Melissa Maimann and our ante natal teacher, Julie Clarke. It was basically life changing. I had known I would have needed to hit the books for this but who would have thought I find so much conflicting information. It was hard making the right choices. It was doubly hard to not have my sisters around which I rely on so much for guidance. Jed was so good and read everything I told him to. I only had to chuck temper tantrums once a month. =)

In the end, I decided I wanted to have a home birth because I dislike being told what to do with regards to my body and I strongly dislike needles. I spent a lot of time visualising what my ideal birth/labour would be like and tried to get the support network I needed to achieve this dream. It wasn’t easy finding medical people to agree so in the end I realised it would probably just be Jed, Alicia and my mom helping me. I prayed to whoever was listening that everything would go smoothly and I that neither Zachary or I would not need medical help.

Fast forward about 9 months to December, my mucus plug came out throughout the day on the 13th with no signs of labour. So we decided to head over to the homeopath for back up help if needed to get the contractions going.
Almost a week later, on the 22nd of December my waters broke at 2am. It was such a surreal feeling as I sneezed and wet the bed. I was surprised at how wet the bed was and decided to stand up and this big gush of clear warm water ran down my legs. I then realised that my waters had broken and that I would be meeting my baby today.
I woke Jed up and told him the news. Since there were no signs of contractions once again I decided to take the homeopathic remedy and we both went back to sleep.

By 4am, I was uncomfortable enough to wake up and walk around. I emptied my bowels multiple times and drank lots of water and ate some fruit. At 5am I woke Jed up and told him to pump up the exercise ball and warm up the heat packs. By 6am, contractions were regular and about 15 minutes apart, Jed started filling up the bath tub. However, there was no hot water because the water heater had been turned off. So off he woke mom up to take over comforting me and went to boil many many pots of water.

I sat on the bathroom floor rocking on the exercise ball and constantly visualising a soft open cervix and my baby descending nicely. I breathed nicely through each contraction remember our Calmbirth classes.
Heat packs placed on the lower back and under the belly helped with the discomfort as well.
The exercise ball was good for sleeping and resting on between contractions. Around 7 o’clock the bath tub was finally ready, got in and felt lots better. Alicia came shortly after and took over from mom. She gave awesome back rubs and was such a grounding energy which was exactly what I needed to get things done. Things went quickly after that.

Jed got into the water around 8am and I knelt down with my arms wrapped around him. Contractions were about 5 minutes apart then and required a lot more attention. I kept reminding myself that each contraction meant one step closer to seeing Zachary. I felt him slowly pressing down on my cervix and my cervix dilating.
Vocalising helped during the contractions. Jed was a great help reminding me to breathe and not hold my breath.
He was like a rock I knew I could rely on. Did a few self vaginal exams and could feel Zachary’s head progressing downwards.
At about 8.20am I realised I was in transition, his head was crowning and I wasn’t fully dilated. Was upset and freaked out but Alicia reminded me to trust in my body. Took a deep breath and focused on opening my cervix up. A few minutes later I was ready to push, Zachary came out head first with a hand. I rested for a few seconds till the next contractions came and looked up at Jed and said “Are you ready? He is coming.” Jed caught Zachary Francis McKenna at 8.38am
We were both ecstatic and sat there admiring for a while. He started crying almost immediately and looked around at all of us.
Stood up and tried to birth placenta but couldn’t so I went back to the room. He started feeding soon after and I was enjoying his skin to skin contact. The doctor arrived soon after he advised us to clamp the cord and get the placenta out.
Jed was frantic and really wanted the placenta out because he was worried about bleeding. I was getting a little annoyed by his constant fussing. We clamped the cord and Jed cut it. The doctor applied gentle traction and got the placenta out. Finally we were left alone for some quiet time.

I would like to thank my lovely husband for supporting me through the pregnancy and birth and agreeing to a home birth and studying so hard.
I would also like to thank Melissa and Julie for their teachings which allowed me to have the confidence to do this, although neither of them endorsed free birthing they were not judgmental.

No amount of thank you can express my gratitude for having Alicia around to show me there were many options and that we need to take charge of our own births.
Many thanks to my Mom and Dad for allowing me to use their house. Last of all, Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

NC Women Face Charges After Newborn’s Death

Link

Two women have been charged with practicing midwifery without a license in North Carolina after a newborn died following an underwater home birth.

… Charlotte police say the women were at a private home last week assisting with an underwater birth, in which the baby is delivered in a tub of warm water … there were complications with the delivery, and the newborn died after being rushed to a local hospital.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Couple threaten legal action to ensure homebirth service; hospital engages private midwives for homebirth service

Link

Bosses at Whipps Cross University Hospital have decided to reinstate its home births service after a couple threatened legal action.

The cash-strapped hospital in Leytonstone announced earlier this month that it would be impossible to provide midwives to households from December 18 for up to six weeks due to staff shortages.

But now … extra funding has been made available to pay for an independent midwife service for those who were hit by the sudden suspension.

Adam and Michelle Boult … were planning to have a home birth in January and were so outraged by the hospital’s plan to stop the service they called in a barrister, who argued the hospital had a legal responsibility to support them.

Mr Boult, a 32-year-old journalist, said: “While they would probably deny it, to get them to agree to this has taken an extraordinary amount of pressure.

“We were lucky enough to have a very helpful barrister and solicitor who have pushed for the Trust to reconsider its stance, culminating in Whipps Cross receiving a pre-action letter suggesting a judicial review”.

… In a joint statement, Whipps Cross and ONEL said: “[We] are committed to offering all women in the local area the best possible choice of how and where they give birth.

“We have been working together to find a way to offer a home birth service during the next four weeks. Safety is our priority, and we did have some concerns about staffing levels over this period.

“However, by working together, the hospital and NHS ONEL are now able to bring in independent midwives for this limited period, until the hospital’s Home Birth Service team is in place.

“This means those women who asked for a home birth in the next four weeks can have one. We have always been committed to developing the Home Birth Service and to ensuring we provide high quality, safe and consistent services to all women.”

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Unassisted: Home Birth in Nebraska

Link

… Birth is big business to a healthcare industry … Hospitals are reinventing themselves to create an atmosphere catering to a woman’s evolving needs. However, some Nebraska women want to take their business out of the hospital altogether, but find their choice may not be a legally viable option.

Methodist Women’s Hospital … sits just off the interstate in Elkhorn. The modern, two-building facility is a “one-stop shop” for women’s health. Women-centered facilities are not a new concept in the health care industry, but resorting back to a more home-like and natural birth experience is … the hospital’s new labor and delivery rooms … are as “home-like” as they can get.

… a lot more women are asking for natural birth plans lately, meaning births with limited medical interferences such as epidurals, labor inducing medications, and cesarean sections. After our tour, I asked Korth about the most natural of birth plans: the home birth.

“We feel like we’ve done a very good job as getting as close to that as we possibly can,” she said …

But, there are some Nebraska couples who feel a hospital will never replace the comfort of home …

“I’m terrified of hospitals,” laughed Katie. And she knows hospitals, Katie works at one in Omaha and her husband, John, is a paramedic.

“It’s just an uncomfortable environment, I think,” she said. “From the bed you’re in, to the room that you’re in, to multiple people coming in and out, in and out, not necessarily telling you what they’re doing or what’s going on—they’re just doing it. It’s just so impersonal…I’m just afraid of that.”

The couple is not expecting just yet, but is looking at their options. They prefer an assisted home birth with a … Midwife, but they will face some difficult choices in their planning. The birth experience they want is also an illegal one. Nebraska is one of two states where an assisted home birth attended by a … Midwife is prohibited. Alabama is the second.

Katie fears the professional and personal implications of having a home birth.

“I would fear for my job if I had a home birth,” she said. “But it is scary, the thought of doing it, not just my job, but with my family and society and the view of what that means.”

John said he’s also unsure of the professional implications he could face. He hasn’t told any of his paramedic instructors about their plans, but only one co-worker because he said he trusts her.

… If Katie decides on a home birth, it would be difficult to find a … Midwife willing to help. The penalties for an attending midwife can range from license revocation to jail time.

… Prentice is the owner of the WomanKind Midwifery, located in … South Dakota … She never delivers in Nebraska, but says Nebraska mothers from as far southeast as Lincoln drive hours, or days, to see her. She said these women are “desperate” to have a different type of natural birth.

Speaking from her office in Spearfish, Jeanne said, “They want a different experience, they don’t want to be induced, they don’t want an epidural, they don’t want to be flat on their back with a monitor. They want something different. They want that personal care. And they can’t get it in their home state.”

Prentice said the atmosphere that compels women to drive hundreds of miles can never be replicated in a hospital setting. Hospitals are meant to treat disease … something she sternly added pregnancy is not. And as for the new home-like atmospheres, Prentice isn’t buying it. She feels hospitals are quick to perform interventions, sometimes unnecessarily, breaking the tranquility of an otherwise quiet room.

“You can put nice Pergo floor in and you can hide your equipment, but the minute things look a little or feel a little scary to you, you drag that stuff out,” …

… Back in Elkhorn, Certified Nurse Midwife, Marilyn Lowe is one of four CNMs who make up Methodist’s new Midwifery Department. Lowe says a natural birth doesn’t have to take place outside of a hospital. After a full day of seeing patients, Lowe spoke with me after hours in her office.

“Birth is a philosophy,” Lowe said. “And it can be as natural in a hospital as it can be in a home. Our goal is to help that woman accomplish what she wants to accomplish.”

“We also have patients who want epidurals,” she said. “But if somebody wants a natural birth, that is our goal to help them accomplish that with as little intervention, but yet knowing if we need that intervention, it’s available.”

… But for Katie and John, not having the option of an attended home birth leaves them feeling unsafe and frustrated. Katie is perplexed at the notion that they can deliver themselves, but not with a trained professional.

“For me I want to have a home birth, but I don’t wanna just be by myself at home popping out a kid,” she said. “What if something goes wrong?”

“My biggest frustration is that I can have a home birth, me and my husband can have our kid at home, but we can’t have somebody who’s trained to be there with us.”

… Tony Fulton of Lincoln wants to repeal a single line in Nebraska’s medical laws: the one prohibiting … Midwives from attending home births …

Fulton was approached by Nebraska mothers asking for his help years ago … “For them to be stigmatized as strange or awkward, it’s the ultimate of ironies because these are moms,” … “And often times the stigmas are being foisted upon them by those who are not moms.”

Jessica Freeman is a mother of three and a board member of Nebraska Friends of Midwives. During her first pregnancy, she said like most newly expectant mothers, she had read many books on child birth. But when it came time to deliver, she said she experienced interventions by hospital staff she felt might not be safe.

Her doctor broke her water, and told her to push, an urge, Freeman said, she never had.

“I came out feeling… just not sure what I was doing,” Freeman said. … And that translates into your mothering.”

That experience led Freeman to seek out a home birth for her next two children. Her first home birth was performed in New York, and despite the ban, her second was in Nebraska. For that birth, Freeman imported a midwife from New York*. (*Correction: the imported midwife was not from New York, but was imported from another state)

“We’re not looking for 50 percent of births to be in the home,” she said. “We’re just saying we want the ones who know about home birth, want to be able to have a safe home birth, we want to be able to have an attendant there, to make sure nothing goes terribly wrong, and to help us if something does go wrong.”

… Sarah Jacobitz-Kizzier is in her final year as a University of Nebraska Medical Center student. She’s planning to become a family physician. I asked her why she believes the medical community is resistant to allow home births. She said it’s a “fear of lawsuits, losing their own medical license …

… in medical school, the practice of home birth is never brought up. And often, she said, the topic was “taboo” with fellow med students. She said she feels women should have as many options as they want. And she said there are widespread misconceptions about women who want home births.

“The one that is most polarizing and the most untrue, is … that women who choose to do home births are labeled as having a stronger emphasis on the process of the birth rather than the outcome …

… “Virtually every other state allows this except Nebraska,” he said. “Either Nebraska is going to be the safest place on the planet to have babies, or it’s going to stick out like a sore thumb.”

No matter how “home-like” the hospital delivery suite is, it will never be like home. There is something about being in your own private, comfortable and familiar space, using your own shower / kitchen / lounge room, eating off your own plates and being surrounded by what you know, that can never be replicated by a hospital. Of course, some women will be safer birthing in the hospital, but wherever possible, I believe women should be encouraged and supported to birth at home.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Midwives Use Rituals To Send Message That Women’s Bodies Know Best

Link

In reaction to what midwives view as the overly medicalized way hospitals deliver babies, they have created birthing rituals to send the message that women’s bodies know best.

The midwife experience uses these rituals to send the message that home birth is about female empowerment, strengthening relationships between family and friends, and facilitating participatory experiences that put mothers in control, with the ultimate goal of safe and healthy deliveries less focused on technological intervention.

These are some of the findings from an Oregon State University researcher and licensed midwife who witnessed more than 400 home births in order to document an extensive list of practices utilized by midwives to express the symbolic difference between home and hospital births.

… “We know, for instance, that midwives have better health outcomes in some areas, such as reduced rates of surgical delivery and labor induction, than hospitals. But I wanted to examine how ritual might play a part in producing these positive health outcomes.”

… evidence shows that hospital births result in about triple the rate of cesarean section for low-risk women compared to midwife-attended home births …

What she found was a network of common practices, messages and beliefs that resulted in midwives constructing woman-centered rituals around pregnancy and birth that were set up in opposition to what they believe are the overly medicalized practices of hospitals.

For instance … midwives conducted many of the same diagnostic procedures as a physician would prenatally, from blood pressure and weight checks to blood testing and fetal heart tone evaluation …

… “Many midwives also downplayed the centrality of monitoring and resuscitation equipment setting them off to the side, or placing them under baby blankets during labor so women would not be reminded of the technology in the room. Mothers and babies were still monitored closely, but the monitoring was not made the central focus.”

The differences aren’t so much in practice … but in performance.

Cheyney also documented the use of common phrases to create birthing mantras. She lists phrases such as “don’t fight it,” “let your body do it,” “open,” and “let it be strong,” as key components … Many mothers … reported feeling strong and capable during their labors, and women who compared their hospital birth to their home birth reported feeling like they were “doing something, rather than just lying there passively waiting.” Midwives also commonly expressed the statement that they were simply “guardians,” and that women have all the tools inside of them to birth their own babies.

… It is Cheyney’s belief that both of these sets of rituals have caused a wide chasm between … hospital births and the 1 percent who choose home births.

“Just as women and their doctors who deliver in the hospital often feel convinced that their birth was the only safe and ‘correct’ way, women and midwives who deliver at home feel strongly that they have the solution,” … “They believe it with every cell in their body because they have lived it.”…

There is definitely something special and unique about homebirth that cannot be summarised in words alone.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Low-risk births don’t need hospital

Link

A new study in England shows little difference in complications among the babies of women with low-risk pregnancies who delivered in hospitals versus those who gave birth with midwives at home or in birthing centers.

… home births are advisable only when there are low risk factors. If the patient has … [medical] conditions, is about to deliver twins, or has high blood pressure or hypertension, home births aren’t recommended …

“Home birth can be just as safe as hospital birth if people are providing it to the correct patient appropriately,” …

… “Birth isn’t an abnormal process, it’s a physiological process,” he said. “And if your pregnancy and labor is not complicated, then you don’t need a high level of specific expertise.”
… about 50 percent of pregnant women in England — those who are low-risk — should be able to choose where to have their baby.

More than 90 percent of pregnant women in England now give birth in a hospital. Some officials say the new study should prompt women to consider alternatives.

… midwife-run birth centers in England have a more homelike environment, with privacy, sofas and birthing pools.

In Britain, midwives deliver more than 60 percent of babies already. Similar care is provided in the Netherlands, where about a quarter of all births happen at home …

… researchers found a higher risk for first-time mothers planning a home birth. Among those women, there were 9.3 adverse events per 1,000 births, including babies with brain damage due to labor problems and stillbirth. That compared to 5.3 adverse events per 1,000 births for those planning a hospital birth …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Home Births – Then And Now

Link

A comparison of home-birth trends of the 1970s finds many similarities – and some differences – related to current trends in home births.

… in the 1970s – as now – women opting to engage in home births tended to have higher levels of education … in the late 1970s, one third of the group’s members participating in home births had a bachelor’s, master’s or doctoral degree. Fewer than one percent did not have a high school education.

Also, according to the 2,000 respondents to HOME’s 1978 survey, 36 percent of women engaging in home births at the time were attended by physicians. That is a much higher percentage than is the case currently for mothers participating in home births. (In research by Eugene Declerq, Boston University School of Public Health, and Mairi Breen Rothman, Metro Area Midwives and Allied Services, it was found that about five percent of homebirths were attended by a physician in 2008.)

… The debate surrounding health, safety and home births rose to national prominence as recently as October 2011 during the Home Birth Consensus Summit in Virginia, held because of increasing interest in home births as an option for expectant mothers.

Overall, Kline’s research of HOME and of ACOG counters the stereotypical view of the 1970s home-birth movement as countercultural and peopled by “hippies.” In fact, the founders of HOME deliberately reached out to a broad cross section of women across the political and religious spectrum, including religious conservatives as well as those on the left of the political spectrum.

… “In looking through the historical record, we find that many women involved in home births in the 1970s signed their names ‘Mrs. Robert Smith’ or ‘Mrs. William Hoffman.’ The movement included professionals, business people, farmers, laborers and artists. It defies simplistic categorization.”

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Mums seek homebirth funding

Link

ALI Hookham of Lismore is due to give birth in five days.

The 28-year-old would prefer to give birth at home but like many North Coast mothers Ms Hookham cannot afford to hire a private midwife.

… Ms Hookham is one of more than 200 women who have signed a petition calling for a publicly-funded homebirth program on the North Coast.

“The community has been waiting, they know it needs to be done and we’re keen to hear about their progress,” she said.

But Northern NSW Local Health District chief executive Chris Crawford denied they had been slow to respond to calls for publicly funded homebirths.

… “We are always influenced by the fact that a particular proposal has community support but we have to be conscious of the safety of the mother, the safety of staff and potential liability issues,” he said.

Medicare funding is available for care with some private midwives, and this funding assists with the pregnancy and postnatal care of women who are planning a homebirth. Some private health funds will also cover the cost of the birth.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Hospital births for healthy women? What does the research say?

The recent Birthplace Study was the first of its kind to compare outcomes for low-risk, healthy women who gave birth in midwife-led units (both alongside and freestanding), obstetric units and at home. My previous blog post described the findings for first-time Mums birthing at home, but what did the findings say about hospital birth?

The study is extremely positive and shows that birth is generally very safe for mothers and babies who are low risk and healthy. In fact, the chance of something going very wrong for the baby was so low that the researchers had to combine mortality and morbidity to get any meaningful data. There were so few deaths in the study (38 out of nearly 65,000 births) that they had to combine a host of adverse outcomes in order to come up with any statistically significant results. Therefore the “primary outcome” included baby deaths and serious morbidity (injury / illness) to the baby. Overall, a low risk woman had a 4.3/1,000 risk of having a “primary outcome” (that is, death or serious injury to the baby). For women birthing in hospital, the figure was 4.4/1,000 and was actually lower for babies born at home and in midwifery-led units. Imagine that: the risk to the baby overall was highest in hospital!

Breaking this down further, if we look at first-time Mums separately to second and subsequent time Mums, the figures look different. First time Mums had a 5.3/1,000 chance of a “primary outcome” overall. This rose to 9.3/1,000 for women who planned to birth at home, and fell to 4.5 for women birthing in a midwifery-led unit. It was 5.3/1,000 for first-time mums who birthed in hospital. Again, we see that hospital birth confers some increased risk for first time Mums.

Now looking at women birthing for the second (or subsequent) time, we find that the overall risk of a “primary outcome” was very low: 3.1/1,000. This was higher in an obstetric (hospital) unit at 3.3/1,000, lower in a midwifery-led unit (2.7/1,000) and lowest for women birthing at home (2.3/1,000). So once again, the study is showing that hospital is not the safest place to birth a baby if you are a low-risk, healthy women.

If you are having your first baby and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is in a midwifery unit, and if you have birthed before and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is at home.

Of course, midwifery units have limited capabilities to provide higher levels of care, and as labour and birth are unpredictable, there needs to be robust transfer arrangements in place. Some 10-45% of women transfer in birth. This figure is lowest for women who have birthed before, and highest in first-time Mums. As well as robust transfer arrangements, women – particularly first-time Mums – need to be aware of the chance of transfer and to be comfortable with this possibility. This is best accommodated if the woman can transfer in with her own midwife.

What were the intervention rates like?

Not surprisingly, intervention rates were highest in women who planned a hospital birth. 93% women who planned a homebirth had a normal birth, versus only 74% women in the hospital. 11% had a caesarean in the obstetric (hospital) unit, versus a mere 2.8% in women who planned a home birth. 24% women had their labours sped up with a syntocinon drip in the planned hospital birth group, versus only 5% in the women who planned a homebirth. 31% women had an epidural in the planned hospital birth group, versus 8% at home. And of course, episiotomy rates were lowest at home.

It is clear that being in hospital greatly increases risks for all low risk mothers compared to being at home or in a midwife led unit (either alongside or freestanding).

It is clear that low-risk women have much to gain by planning a birth with midwives in a birth centre or some other form of midwifery-led care. Planned homebirth does increase the risks to the babies of first-time Mums, with an increase in adverse outcomes for babies from about 0.5% to just under 1%. But what is it about planning a homebirth that increases the risk to the baby? The study used intention to treat analysis, so we are not able to know how many of those adverse outcomes occurred in those who transferred to hospital after a planned homebirth, versus those that happened in the births that actually occurred at home. We do know that the outcomes of homebirth transfers are generally worse than those who had been planned to occur in hospital, and first-time Mums are more likely to transfer. We also know that birth is generally riskier for a first-time Mum than a woman who has birthed before.

Regardless, the study is extremely positive in supporting the role of primary midwifery care and the excellent outcomes that low-risk women can achieve when they choose a midwife as their care provider. Imagine the benefits as well for high-risk women who receive midwifery care with appropriate and timely obstetric care.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Homebirth for first-time Mums: what does the research say?

Link

…Homebirth carries a higher risk for the babies of first-time mothers, according to a landmark study published in the British Medical Journal.

However, the chance of harm to the baby is still under 1% …

For a second birth there was no difference in the risk to babies between home, a midwife-led unit or a doctor-led hospital unit.

Midwife-led care was in general much more likely to lead to a natural birth.

The Birthplace study is the largest carried out into the safety of different maternity settings – comparing births at home, in midwife-led units attached to hospitals, those that are stand-alone and doctor-led hospital units.

All the women followed had healthy pregnancies and began labour with no known risk factors.

It found that, overall, birth is very safe wherever it happens.

The rates of complications, including stillbirth or other problems affecting the baby, was 5.3 per 1,000 births in hospital compared with 9.3 per 1,000 home births (for women having their first baby).

Rate of complications for first-borns per 1,000

Stand-alone midwife unit – 4.5
Hospital midwife unit – 4.7
Hospital – 5.3
Home – 9.3

… About 45% of women planning to have their first baby at home were transferred during labour, although this was mainly because of delays in giving birth and the need for an epidural pain-relief injection, rather than because the baby was in distress.

Rates of normal birth

60% hospital obstetric unit
76% hospital midwife unit
83% freestanding midwife unit
90% home

The transfer itself was not thought to be responsible for the difference because there was no raised risk for women moved from stand-alone midwife units to hospital during labour.

There was no difference in risk when women were having their second baby, whether that was at home, in a midwife unit or a traditional hospital setting.

The rate of transfer from home to hospital was much lower too, at just 12% (for women having their second and subsequent babies).

… [This study] reveals an unexplained difference in the rate of normal birth between units run by midwives and those run by doctors. The disparity on emergency Caesarean sections is particularly striking. It suggests a different culture in the way midwives and doctors see birth, with doctors concerned about risks and midwives focused on normality.

… this research should drive an an expansion in midwife-led care, either at birth centres or at home for the half of women expected to have a low-risk birth.

… The research also confirms that midwife-led care is much more likely to lead to a normal birth – without any interventions, including forceps or ventouse.

That was true whether the baby was born at home or in a midwife-led unit.

The emergency Caesarean rate for the low-risk women in the study was 11% in doctor-led units compared with only 2.8% at home, and 4.4% in a midwife led unit on a hospital site.

… “Where a woman needs an emergency Caesarean section for their first birth, they will not be regarded as low risk for the next birth, and won’t have the choice of going outside a medically-led unit.”

The Key Findings of the study:

Giving birth is generally very safe

For ‘low risk’ women, the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes (intrapartum stillbirth, early neonatal death, neonatal encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome, and specified birth related injuries including brachial plexus injury) was low (4.3 events per 1000 births).

Midwifery units appear to be safe for the baby and offer benefits for the mother

… there were no significant difference in adverse perinatal outcomes compared with planned birth in an obstetric unit.

Women who planned birth in a midwifery unit … had significantly fewer interventions, including substantially fewer intrapartum caesarean sections, and more ‘normal births’ than women who planned birth in an obstetric unit.

For women having a second or subsequent baby, home births and midwifery unit births appear to be safe for the baby and offer benefits for the mother

For multiparous women, there were no significant differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between planned home births or midwifery unit births and planned births in obstetric units.

For multiparous women, birth in a non-obstetric unit setting significantly and substantially reduced the odds of having an intrapartum caesarean section, instrumental delivery or episiotomy.

For women having a first baby, a planned home birth increases the risk for the baby

For nulliparous women, there were 9.3 adverse perinatal outcome events per 1000 planned home births compared with 5.3 per 1000 births for births planned in obstetric units, and this finding was statistically significant.

For women having a first baby, there is a fairly high probability of transferring to an obstetric unit during labour or immediately after the birth

For nulliparous women, the peri-partum transfer rate was 45% for planned home births, 36% for planned FMU births and 40% for planned AMU births

For women having a second or subsequent baby, the transfer rate is around 10%

For women having a second or subsequent baby, the proportion of women transferred to an obstetric unit during labour or immediately after the birth was 12% for planned home births, 9% for planned FMU births and 13% for planned AMU births.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Doctors claim homebirth risks ignored

Link

WA doctors have attacked a new policy for State Government-funded homebirths, saying it sidesteps serious concerns about the increased risk of newborn deaths.

The draft document says women have a right to choose a home delivery at taxpayers’ expense provided they are at low risk of complications and give their consent.

But women with risk factors such as a previous caesarean, obesity or a history of blood loss in childbirth should be excluded from publicly funded homebirths.

… Australian Medical Association WA said the policy fudged serious concerns raised by former members of the committee, who found the risk of death in babies born at home was almost four times higher and called for funded homebirth to be banned.

“Not only is the taxpayer entitled to think public monies are going to things that are evidence-based, if the evidence suggests it’s more dangerous they should have even greater concerns.” …

The WA homebirth policy is a very considered and thorough document that supports low-risk homebirth for women who are attended by experienced midwives with a back-up hospital booking and obstetric consultation. Unfortunately the doctors quoted in the above article seem to have mixed their research. Studies clearly demonstrate that low-risk homebirth is at least as safe as hospital birth, and with fewer interventions for mothers in labour. It is high risk homebirth that is associated with excess perinatal mortality and this is not supported under the WA policy, or any other publicly-funded homebirth programs.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Turbulent times

A lot has been happening in the world of homebirth and midwifery. Many will have read the articles about homebirth, freebirth, midwives and maternity care that are appearing in our papers on a daily basis.

I have not posted for a couple of weeks now, for three main reasons: one I have been really busy with my practice which has not been this busy for about two years. Second, I attended the Australian College of Midwives National Conference – the ACM worked really hard to deliver an excellent conference that was appreciated by all. I had the fantastic opportunity to meet midwives from around Australia and share ideas, discuss practice and talk birthy things. I was pleased that the conference was in Sydney, because as those of you who know me will know, in my non-midwifery life I rescue and care for injured and orphaned native birds, and so I was able to make a trip home most days of the conference to feed everyone at home. They were hungry but they all survived! I digress. The third reason for not posting was that the recent issues have made me re-assess things like responsibility, accountability, safety, choice, control, autonomy, beneficence, informed decision-making and many other issues. I have no answers to report. Just lots of reflection.

Midwifery and maternity care are going through turbulent times and as professionals and organisations, I feel that we have done a major disservice to women that they feel safer birthing at home – with or without a registered midwife – in the presence of risk factors – because they so strongly believe that the hospital system will not enable them to birth in the manner of their choosing. It is a sad reflection on the health system and the professionals who work within it. Women who cannot access midwifery care because they are planning a VBAC. Women who are told that if they insist on birthing vaginally with twins, they must accept continuous monitoring, induction, epidural and birth in stirrups for twin two. Women whose only option is to birth in a hospital that is two hours from their home. We have all heard the stories.

My biggest disappointment is the lack of midwife admitting rights. We are one year into the maternity reforms on November 1 this year. We have eligible midwives with Medicare provider numbers, ordering tests and working with doctors to provide safe care to women and babies – yet we cannot access hospitals to provide this care. I well understand that there are a lot of hurdles to be overcome with midwife admitting rights, and life has taught me that nothing in life is impossible.

The release of the homebirth position statement – which I fully support as an evidence-based and safe way to provide care – combined with the lack of midwife admitting rights, is disastrous for women and midwives. Higher risk women are forced into a position of birthing in hospital without their midwife if the midwife complies with the position statement but has no admitting rights – otr else freebirthing, potentially with disastrous consequences. Overnight, this change occurred and women are fuming.

It is impossible to believe, but an eligible midwife who crosses all the “T”s and dots all the “I”s will suffer incredibly in terms of restriction of clientele, however if she were to remove her name from the register – something that I understand is very easy to do – she may do just as she pleases with no accountability, regulation or practice standards. Midwives are placed in the untenable situation of a dwindling practice, or unregistering and having a flourishing practice. Until admitting rights are in place, midwives will have no place to birth with their higher-risk clients. This situation does not see the Government supporting midwives or women. It is creating a disaster.

The various politics of homebirth and midwifery has created an enormous rift between midwives. It seems that there are the bunch who have elected to become eligible, forge ahead with collaborative arrangements, push for admitting rights and accept the increased regulation that is upon us as our profession matures. The other group opposes the increased regulation and restriction of choice, supports midwife- (or non-midwife)-attended homebirth for any woman who wants it and really wants things to just go back to how they used to be, before insurance became mandatory. Many midwives sit comfortable in the middle of this debate. It is sad to watch such division and animosity amongst midwives. We seem to lack a capacity of saying, “We don’t share each other’s vision and we have made different choices, but we are midwives and we will support each other”. As one midwife said to me, “We are each doing the best we can for the women we care for and we’re making the best of a rotten situation”.

I know 2012 will be better than 2011. Who knows? Maybe it’ll be an historic year where for the very first time, women will birth on their own terms, with their chosen midwife, at home or in hospital. I wonder how many women will insist on homebirth in spite of significant risks, if they are able to birth in hospital with their own midwife and in the manner of their choosing.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Choosing Your Midwife

Midwives are qualified and educated to care for women throughout normal pregnancy, birth and the postnatal / newborn period. Midwives are also known as the experts in natural birth, attending water births, home births and hospital births. Finding the best midwife for your needs can be a challenging task, but it’s one of the most important decisions a family will make when they decide to work with a midwife. The midwife’s knowledge, skill and experience are key to a safe and satisfying pregnancy and birth experience.

When engaging the services of a private midwife, most people will make contact by phone call or email, and then arrange for an initial consultation. At the consultation, the midwife and family interview each other to explore whether the relationship feels right for them and meets their needs. Midwives will ask about the woman’s health history, her care needs, her previous birth experiences, her attitudes and beliefs about birth and her expectations of her midwife.

What sorts of questions can women ask their midwife? Well, there are lots of questions you could ask and I’ve included some below.

Be sure to ask about qualifications and experience, including whether your midwife is an eligible midwife. You are able to claim medicare benefits if your eligible midwife has a collaborative arrangement and is able to access obstetric care for you if it becomes necessary. If you are told, “I have three years of experience” ask where that experience was obtained – in a hospital? Private practice? If in private practice, how many births does she attend a year? 2? 20? Generally for private practice, the more experience that is gained, the better: when a midwife works in private practice, she works alone and needs a good level of skill, experience and judgment to practice safely. Experience is always the best teacher.

Ask your midwife about her relationships with hospitals and doctors. This will provide insight into your midwife’s ability to negotiate and communicate.

Many women ask for references but this can be tricky as they would come from former clients of your midwife. This of course brings up issues of confidentiality, and it is against the Public Health Act for midwives to place testimonials on their websites. You can ask your midwife if she has any former clients who would be prepared to speak with you, but be mindful of confidentiality processes and women’s rights to privacy. What your midwife can do, is to provide a summary of the feedback that she has received from her clients. This will tell you that your midwife is engaged in quality assurance processes and would also provide a way of reading feedback from previous clients.

Ask your midwife what her service includes and does not include. Also ask about fees, back-up arrangements and obstetric back-up arrangements.

Are there any questions families should not ask their midwife? Generally, interviews with midwives can be approached as a job interview. Questions that are appropriate in a job interview would be fine to ask your prospective midwife. Questions regarding religion, marital status, age, previous birth experiences, previous terminations and other personal questions ought not be asked.

Finally, it’s really important that you feel comfortable with your midwife and that you feel that you trust her. Reliability is important, as is trust, respect and honesty.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Charging women for non-medical caesareans?

Link

The health minister has said that women in Northern Ireland who choose to have a Caesarean for non-medical reasons may have to pay for the operation.

Edwin Poots is launching a consultation on a review of maternity services.

Women at low risk will be encouraged to consider having their baby in a midwife-led unit or at home, if appropriate.

Around 30% of deliveries are by Caesarean section – the highest level in the UK and Ireland.

… giving birth was a natural process and superb assistance was available to help women through the delivery.

“It costs several thousand pounds more for a Caesarean section so there are savings to be made,” …

“… what we want to encourage, is more people to give birth naturally because it has better outcomes for the mother and the baby.

… “We want to ensure that people take the natural choice where they can and to have that back up where they need Caesarean section to take place.”

… At present, women who elect to go private to have a Caesarean on non-medical grounds pay for their pre and post-natal care.

But the cost of the delivery is met by the health service.

… women will be encouraged to have their baby in a midwife led unit

“If you want to go down that route, if you want to pay for it, it is totally up to yourself, but I don’t feel that we the public in Northern Ireland should be paying additional money for people to have the choice.”

The minister said he expected to see a “considerable” number of midwifery units being established.

“A lot of them would be set up in association with the main maternity unit, so they would be on the same site as existing hospitals,” …

“Women would be giving birth totally with the midwives but there would be a fallback position of having an obstetrician nearby if things do not work out.”

Breedagh Hughes from the Royal College of Midwives said the focus was on trying to “normalise” child birth.

… “One of the things we hope will come out in the review will be asking trusts to look at … the reasons for the Caesarean sections and to focus on trying to prevent women from having that first Caesarean section, which very often leads to the old adage – ‘once a section always a section’.”

She said a “fear” of child birth stopped many women from choosing a natural birth.

“When one in every three women gives birth by Caesarean section, you lose that critical mass of people who know what it is like to give birth normally, and women are losing confidence in their own body’s ability to give birth,” she said.

Ms Hughes also welcomed proposals to shift the focus to midwife led care.

“I think if women are given the opportunity to get to know and trust their midwife and to trust their own bodies, we’re more likely to see women saying, ‘OK, this is what nature intended me for and this is what I’m going to do’,” …

Visit my website to explore birthing services

Debate to mandate a license for Oregon midwives reignites after baby’s death

Link

Randy Everitt, a top state health regulator, calls it “a hornet’s nest.”

Val Hoyle, a Eugene lawmaker, calls it “a hot mess.”

The death of a Eugene newborn as well as pressure from the state medical establishment has revived the debate over whether midwives should be allowed to deliver babies without a license. Currently, 27 states allow midwives; only in Oregon and Utah is a license for midwives optional.

Half of the estimated 150 midwives in Oregon are licensed, an apprenticeship process that requires attending 45 births while under supervision, completing 40 hours of specialized training and passing a variety of exams. About 1,000 home births per year occur in Oregon.

Pressure to mandate licensing for all midwives has repeatedly collided with the sentiment that birthing is not state business.

The debate, however, is changing.

In July after eight days of labor, Margarita Sheikh of Eugene gave birth to a boy who had no heartbeat … She blames the two unlicensed midwives … saying they refused to send her to the hospital when she asked, and didn’t appear to know how to give infant CPR …

… News of her case has even caused some licensed midwives to publicly call for change.

For years, Melissa Cheyney … who chairs the state Board of Direct-Entry Midwifery, has not taken a position on mandatory licensing even as she’s studied mortality rates and pushed for better reporting of birth outcomes.

Now, however, she thinks it’s time to make licensing required. Sheikh’s options to hold her midwives accountable are limited because the state can’t investigate unlicensed midwives, says Cheyney, and “I can’t really accept that anymore.”

… “As a feminist it’s a really hard choice for me to make, because I don’t think the government should have its laws on my body,” … “But I also think any provider … should be held to a certain clinical standard.”

Studies have found low-risk home births to be safe: in fact, some have shown fewer complications than hospital births. Studies that include higher-risk pregnancies, however, have found home births to be less safe than ones attended by a medical doctor. Higher-risk births include breech births as well as when a woman has previously had a Caesarean.

Certified nurse midwives, who typically attend hospital births, are required to be licensed … It’s the direct-entry midwives, who typically attend home births, at the center of the mandatory licensing debate.

Midwives who oppose mandatory licensing say it could drive some midwives underground, hurt access to training and restricting access to home births.

Home birthing has a devoted following based on skepticism of the medical establishment.

Sue Burns … intentionally chose an unlicensed midwife, one without access to drugs, to ensure the birth of her daughter last year was as natural as possible. Though she ended up going to a hospital for a Caesarean after 80 hours of labor, she said she’s glad that option was a distant last resort.

Burns says mandatory licensing would make home birthing “much less accessible. It potentially could lead down the road to home births becoming illegal, or before that home birth becoming too expensive for people who don’t have insurance to afford it. Midwives keep each other accountable and I just don’t think the state needs to step in at this point.”

Another factor in the renewed mandatory licensing debate: A flood of investigations has driven up costs and stress for licensed midwives …

More than 40 complaints were filed against licensed midwives in the last year, compared to an annual average of six or seven in years prior …

The complaints required the hiring of three new investigators, he adds. To pay for it, the state is boosting annual midwife licensing fees from $630 to $1,800.

The surge in complaints is partly explained by a 2010 law requiring medical professionals to file complaints if they have concerns over home births transferred to hospitals. But some midwives feel the medical establishment is using the complaint process to eliminate their competition …

Ironically, the perception that any home birth transferred to a hospital will draw a complaint risks making midwives afraid to seek medical help …

… In light of the Sheikh case, she thinks mandatory licensing is inevitable. “As a profession, we should be driving this decision, and not the Legislature and not the anti-midwifery proponents.”

And Stella Dantas, an OHSU doctor who supports mandatory licensing, thinks the cause will be helped by a study expected to be published later this year showing Oregon has a high rate of infant mortality during labor.

… His Eugene colleague, Hoyle, said she wants to find a compromise, “to ensure that we have a system that allows women to make appropriate choices — and to understand who’s qualified and who’s not qualified.”

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Are home births safe?

Link

Jon Barrett is accustomed to dealing with anxious mothers-to-be. As chief of maternal-fetal medicine at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, one of the main concerns he hears from patients involves unnecessary medical interventions during delivery.

He acknowledges that the rate of Caesarian sections and episiotomies is far too high … But he’s more unnerved by what that phenomenon appears to be triggering: a surge in demand for home births.

Barrett’s concerns about home births stem from experience. Between 1990 and 1992, he was part of an obstetric “flying squad” in Newcastle, England. His job was to travel, by ambulance, to the bedsides of women whose home births had gone awry …

Two incidents are particularly vivid. The first occurred in winter. Navigating the ambulance through snowy laneways, Barrett’s team arrived to find two midwives frantically working over an unconscious woman. She was in shock and hemorrhaging badly. “I’ve never seen so much blood in my life.” She survived, but only after a massive blood transfusion in hospital. The second woman developed pre-eclampsia, which caused seizures, and went into cardiac arrest as his ambulance pulled up. His team was able to restart her heart and intubate her before rushing her to hospital. She also survived. He says both conditions were unpredictable and could have occurred anywhere, “But I know they would have come less close to dying if it would have happened in hospital.”

Unlike some of his colleagues on the squad who witnessed fetal deaths during home births, if Barrett’s memories were reduced to pure data in a typical study, they’d be unremarkable. That’s because most home birth data measures deaths, not complications, and his patients survived. “If you want a retrospective study, there’s no maternal mortality there . . . and so is that safe? No, it’s just bloody lucky.”

The question of how best to measure home birth safety has long plagued researchers … what is counted — mortality rates for mothers and babies during childbirth — offers little insight on the maternal side because … maternal deaths from childbirth are rare … But stories like Barrett’s suggest the numbers don’t tell the whole story. In his view, the bottom line should be obvious: “Sooner or later you’re going to get a disaster because that’s the nature of obstetrics.” He adds, “It’s very rare that it will happen, but it’s got to happen more in home birth.”

That assertion is at the heart of a furious debate in the birthing community. Mothers who choose to give birth at home often cite research showing there are fewer medical interventions and no increased risk. But in the past year, a new study has emerged that contradicts this. It shows that home births are associated with significantly higher death rates for babies. If correct, the rights of women to control their own bodies and birth experience would seem to conflict with the best interests of their children.

When the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) released the now-controversial “Wax Study” last summer, it created the medical equivalent of the Rift Valley amongst birthing experts … [It] confirmed significant benefits to mothers who gave birth at home, including less hemorrhaging, vaginal tearing and epidural use, and fewer infections and Caesarean sections. Unfortunately, these benefits seemed to occur at the baby’s expense: … the report showed that neonatal deaths (defined as deaths within 28 days of birth) were two to three times higher for home births. Clearly, no woman who chooses home birth believes she’s jeopardizing her baby’s health, but the study suggested such faith in the safety of home birthing is undermined by medical evidence. For those who accepted Wax’s results, the benefits of giving birth at home suddenly appeared trivial compared to the risks.

In many ways, Wax’s study was groundbreaking … a meta-analysis, combined and re-analyzed existing studies, in order to create a bigger sample and, ideally, a more accurate result. He looked at more than 230 peer-reviewed papers published between 1950 and 2009, and selected a dozen that compared planned home births with planned hospital births by low-risk mothers in industrialized countries (Australia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada and the U.S.). The study’s vast scope—it encompassed more than 500,000 deliveries—boosted its credibility. As one doctor put it, “half a million births cuts out a lot of noise.”

Perhaps, but the momentary silence was followed by an outraged roar from home birth supporters, including some whose research showed very different results. “The Wax study is full of mathematical errors,” says Patti Janssen, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Population and Public Health, and lead author of a 2009 cohort study that showed home births to be as safe as hospital births, for women and babies. “The design was wrong, and the calculations were wrong, and it just has to be thrown out the window.” …

… Wax initially defended his work, but then began refusing interviews … As a flood of letters poured into the AJOG … the publication convened an independent panel to examine the main complaints. In April, it published a sample of those letters, along with a detailed response from Wax. It also released the panel’s conclusion that the study did not need to be retracted.

But the debate has continued, and gained force, in the wake of a second study … out of the Netherlands … it concluded that babies born to low-risk women, under a midwife’s care (in hospital or at home) are more than twice as likely to die as those born to high-risk women who give birth under an obstetrician.

Although these results were specific to Holland, and may indicate problems in the way the Dutch system categorizes women as “low- risk,” the study nevertheless provided fresh ammunition to those who believe babies are best delivered by obstetricians, and added fuel to the home birth debate. More letters began to fly, adding to the stack of seemingly contradictory information through which pregnant women are required to sift in order to make an educated decision.

Nathalie Waite could be the poster mother for the perfect home birth. Waite’s considerations were largely pragmatic when she decided, two years ago, that her fifth baby should be born at home. She had four children attending three different Toronto schools, no nanny, and wanted her delivery to disrupt life as little as possible. It wasn’t a decision she made lightly. Her husband was nervous, but Waite’s midwife reassured them both. They lived near a hospital. Two attending midwives would be in close contact with Waite’s obstetrician and, at the slightest sign of trouble, an ambulance would be in her driveway. Most importantly, Waite knew her own body. She’d had four hospital births. During the two deliveries in which she’d fought … for a natural birth she’d experienced far less pain …

Had she known what a home delivery would be like, Waite says none of her children would have been born in hospital. “It was purely beautiful.” … “it just felt so natural. It just felt right.”

This is why home births are special, says Anne Wilson, president of the Canadian Association of Midwives. “It’s a non-medicalized environment where birth becomes a normal part of your family life.” …

… there is no debating the fact that home births have lower intervention rates. And everyone, on both sides of the argument, agrees that hospital intervention rates are too high …

His daughter’s birth, in Kingston, Ont., in 2007, was such “a spectacular experience” he and his wife decided to repeat it at their new home in Guelph this year. Unfortunately, their son was born with fluid in his lungs, which concerned their midwife enough to send them to hospital. Everything they experienced from that point on, Shaw says, reinforced their preconceptions. Their son was given blood tests, a chest X-ray and an IV for a condition Shaw believes would have cleared up on its own after several hours. They had to fight for permission to breastfeed … and, he says, when the pediatrician went home without leaving instructions for release, their son remained in an incubator for an additional 15 hours. “Our rights were completely taken away and doctors more or less said this is what we’re going to do to your baby and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

… Shaw’s mistrust of the medical system runs deep. “I’ve hung around scientists enough to be skeptical of everything I’m told,” … He and his wife refused vitamin K and erythromycin ointment for their children, two treatments hospitals and midwives administer as standard protocol after birth. (Vitamin K ensures the baby’s blood can clot until it starts making the vitamin itself, and erythromycin is an antibiotic that protects against infections from the birth canal that can cause blindness.) …

In many ways, Shaw and Waite represent opposite ends of the home birth spectrum. Certainly Shaw’s rejection of many of the fundamental tenets of modern medicine contrasts with Waite’s attempt to adapt its benefits to a home birth. But they share an important piece of common ground: both chose to deliver their babies with the help of a midwife.

Freebirthers, women who deliver without assistance (and often shun prenatal care), represent the smallest sub-section of home birth mothers, and aren’t included in studies on home birth safety. Among their most famous advocates is Janet Fraser, an Australian woman who made famous the term “birth rape” to describe an emergency episiotomy during the birth of her son. “I don’t care if you don’t like the word or the idea, it’s real so get used to it,” … In 2009, Fraser’s baby daughter died after five days of home labour. She continues to advocate for freebirth.

Freebirthers make most midwives nervous and they horrify obstetricians. Freebirth is the equivalent of playing “Russian roulette with your child,” says André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). “You don’t play with a child’s life. Especially not where [health care is] free.” That said, the SOGC does believe that midwife-assisted home births are “a reasonable alternative for low-risk women.”

Yet, asked if he would consider home birth a reasonable option for his family, Lalonde is unequivocal. “No. Definitely not.” He falls back on experience for explanation. “I’ve participated in over 6,000 deliveries in my career and I know that everything looks very fine and suddenly disaster strikes.”

That conflict between medical experience and faith in a woman’s body to deliver naturally lies at the heart of the home birth debate. But is the concept of natural childbirth in danger of being romanticized? … There is a documentary, popular amongst home birth advocates, entitled Orgasmic Birth; its website invites viewers to “witness the passion as birth is revealed as an integral part of woman’s sexuality and a neglected human right.” Ami McKay’s award-winning novel The Birth House makes a compelling case for home births to a more mainstream audience. In it, the doctor is portrayed as a condescending, patriarchal figure who knocks out his protesting patients with ether, then yanks out their babies. In contrast, the methods of midwife Dora Rare are equally suspect (think mandrake root and witchcraft) yet portrayed with exquisite humanity …

That kind of experience need not be exclusive to home birth, insist obstetricians. “We should be working to make the environment of the hospital conducive to the home birth experience, rather than having more deliveries at home,” Sunnybrook’s Barrett says.

But midwives like Anne Wilson maintain there’s nothing to equal the experience of a home birth. “If I am delivering a baby in the hospital, you’re a guest in my house. If I’m delivering a baby at home, I’m a guest in your house. And there’s quite a lot of psychological difference there.” Wilson hopes the demand for home births will continue to rise in Canada … she believes that all low-risk women, including those who choose to give birth in hospital, should deliver with a midwife.

That’s the system adopted by the Netherlands — and the Evers study suggests it’s failing dramatically …

“I don’t think it’s that important to debate whether [homebirth is] safe, safer or not safe. I think it’s very important to debate how we can make home birth safer because women are going to do it anyway.”

In the United States, one way to improve safety is by improving midwifery. Training and regulations are a patchwork across the country; in some states, midwives aren’t even required to finish high school. In that respect, the U.S. lags many industrialized countries, including Canada. It’s one of the reasons Canadian midwives bristle at comparisons.

In contrast to the U.S., {Canadian] midwives are university educated, highly regulated, and well-trained in emergency skills …

Obstetricians and midwives are in broad agreement on the key measures necessary to reduce risk during home birth. They are the steps taken by Waite: ideally, a low-risk woman would deliver with the assistance of two highly trained midwives who are in close contact with an obstetrician at a nearby hospital. When those steps are put in place, Wald­man says, “it can work almost as safely as the hospital situation.”

Is “almost” good enough when you’re talking about the survival of a newborn baby? Although he describes himself as a long-time supporter of midwives and birthing centres, the ACOG’s Waldman echoes his Canadian counterpart, Lalonde, when he says he wouldn’t want a home birth for his wife or daughter. “The intrapartum loss rate has got to be higher at home, it’s just intuitional for anybody who does this work. How big that number is could be debated.”

And is being debated. As larger and larger studies are undertaken, Sunnybrook’s Jon Barrett believes the data will start to show consistently higher risks associated with home births …

Visit my website to explore birthing services.