Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

Normal Birth

“I’ve been told my baby is big”

and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Cascade of intervention

A study has found that first-time mothers who have their care within the general hospital system and have their labour induced, face a greater risk of having a caesarean section than those who wait for labour to start on its own.

In the study, 44 percent women had their labour induced, and 20% of those inductions failed (ie, labour did not start) and caesareans were performed in those cases.

By definition, induction is performed before a woman’s body is ready for labour, and this may point to the reason for such a high rate of failed inductions. In other cases, the reason for the induction is also the reason that the caesarean became necessary. For example, a labour may be induced because of concerns for the baby, and once in labour, the baby shows signs that it is not tolerating labour well and so a caesarean is performed.

The study does point to the issue that inductions should not be performed unless they are genuinely necessary. Up to 50% inductions may not be “indicated”, that is, performed for a medical reason. They might be performed more for convenience, for example. However, if we limit inductions to those which really need to be done, we would lower the caesarean rate.

There are some reasons when an induction might be a good idea, such as when the woman’s blood pressure is high, if the pregnancy goes beyond 42 weeks, if the waters have broken for many hours and labour has not started, if there are concerns for the baby and so on.

Before any induction is commenced, it’s important that women are fully informed by their care provider of the reasons for the induction, the alternatives, the process and procedure, what to expect and the likely outcome.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What are the best positions for labour?

The best positions for labour and birth will be the positions that are the most comfortable for the woman. These are usually also the positions that will assist the baby into a good position to be born.

The positions you decide to use will have an effect on your sense of control and how you experience your labour. Generally, women who are able to move around as they need to, will expefince labour more positively and as being less painful, than women who are confined to the bed.

There are many positions that women will naturally adopt in labour, such as:
- Standing
- Leaning over a bench or couch
- All fours positions
- Kneeling positions
- Walking
- Lying on your side

Because gravity helps the baby’s head to descend deeply into the pelvis, upright positions are generally better for aiding progress in labour while also reducing pain. This is because upright positions work with the body in labour, rather than against it.

Many women choose to birth in the water because the sensation of being in water combined with the lack of gravity makes them feel more mobile and able to position in the best way possible to help the baby move through the pelvis.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Natural Twin Birth

I had a difficult delivery with my first baby, including posterior presentation, premature rupture of membranes, meconium staining, stalled labour, 18 hours of Syntocinon, a largely ineffectual epidural, a 4 hour second stage, and forceps delivery. My daughter had severe respiratory distress and was in the NICU for several days. It was a very tough introduction to parenthood and left me quite traumatised, especially the separation from my daughter. My husband and I decided that we would try for a homebirth if we had another baby, in the hope that a calmer environment would assist the birth process. When I fell pregnant again, we found a lovely homebirth midwife.

I started to show really early. At 8 weeks I was in maternity wear. I thought it was just because it was a second pregnancy, but a 9 week ultrasound showed TWO BABIES. We were completely shocked as there are no twins in my family. Twins of course meant that a homebirth was out of the question.

There followed many long months of argument with various obstetricians about our birth choices. We wanted as little intervention as possible. A standard twin delivery involves syntocinon (which I was very afraid of, after the previous experience), continuous monitoring (which I had hated with my first birth, as I felt chained to the bed) and an epidural prior to the second stage, in case positioning/version or a c-section is necessary to deliver the second twin. In my first birth, the epidural meant I had no pushing urge and seriously compromised my ability to deliver my daughter, hence the very prolonged second stage, so I did not want an epidural this time around, although I was prepared for Synto to be administered between the twins if labour did not re-establish. The hospital also wanted both twins delivered on the bed, which I did not agree with as I had found pushing in that position impossible the first time around. Our views were very challenging to the obstetricians and some were quite aggressive about it, although I must say the head OB was more reasonable and was prepared to admit that my refusal to consent to an epidural would be a “complete contraindication” to giving me one! Throughout this stage our midwife was a pillar of strength and information. She gave us the courage of our convictions and more than once came to the hospital to talk with the obstetricians on our behalf. Even so, the hospital was very unhappy with our birth preferences. It was a stressful time, helped somewhat by a Calmbirth ® course.

In the end all our arguments ended up being moot. At 33 weeks, I started to feel an ominous itching all over. Tests showed elevated bile salts and poor liver function results. I had obstetric cholestasis. Our midwife and the hospital agreed: the babies would need to be delivered by 37 weeks. And I knew that that early, an induction would almost certainly involve Syntocinon.

This was really difficult for me to accept. I was terribly afraid of the drug, and knew that Synto would mean continuous monitoring and therefore limit my movement, which I also feared. However, I knew that my fear would make the delivery more difficult and the pain worse. At this point the hospital dropped the bombshell that despite all their delivery rooms having deep birthing baths, I would not be allowed to use those or the shower if I had to have Synto, as they believe this risks pump damage to the Synto pump. Essentially this meant I was walking into a labour that was likely to be more painful, with less pain relief options. It was going to be down to Calmbirth ® alone, if I wanted to avoid drugs (and I did!).

I did a lot of Calmbirth ® practice from then on. But the Calmbirth ® visualisation exercises presupposed a normal delivery without intervention, and I found it very upsetting to listen to them. I hit on the idea of doing my own visualisations, of a medicalised induction process. After a few of these I was able to work through some of my fears.

On the day of the induction, we kissed our daughter goodbye at 5am and met our midwife at the hospital. Preliminary checks showed a Bishop score of 5, very promising for 36 weeks. The hospital midwife applied prostaglandin gel and sent us out to freedom. We had a lovely breakfast. I started to have sporadic contractions but nothing serious. We returned to the hospital 6 hours later. My cervix had ripened to 2cm, and the very cheerful OB was able to break the waters for twin 1 (our second daughter) at 3.45pm. No meconium staining! I dared to ask the OB how she was presenting. ANTERIOR, WOOHOO! I was very pleased with that.

Contractions came rather more strongly after that point, but were still sporadic. The felt very “knifey”, and our midwife explained this was from the prostaglandin gel. We held off on the Synto as long as possible, but at 6.25pm the drip was put up and contractions started in earnest. Continuous monitoring was in place, but via telemetry so I could have moved. Ironically, though, I didn’t feel the need to. I went deep into calm breathing and spent most of the labour sitting beside the bed on a fit ball, sometimes circling my hips but more often just breathing to ride the contractions with my husband stroking my back. Unlike my first labour, I had no real idea of when the next contraction was coming, and ended up doing my calm breathing (in for 4, out for 6) solidly for hours. I wasn’t afraid of the contractions. I could really feel them doing their work, and little twin 1 moving firm and fast down. I was determined to “get out of the way” of labour and with each contraction focused on opening up and not clenching against the pain. Our midwife was convinced things were going quickly and asked us when we thought we would be having the babies. I told her anything before midnight was a sucker bet! She said 11pm.

At 8.30pm, about 2 hours after I started having regular contractions, the pain was starting to get BIG. The OB did a cervix check – I was 5cm. I was very disheartened by this, but our midwife told me that the first 5cm was the hardest, and the very encouraging OB tried to convince me that it wasn’t all about centimetres and that my cervix felt promisingly thin and stretchy. In hindsight, even in my first labour I dilated from 5 to 10cm in under an hour, so I should have known what was coming – but I didn’t!

Throughout this time I was not making any noise. The hospital’s midwife didn’t seem to think I was in established labour, and threatened to up the Synto dose to make the contractions “strong and regular”, even though they were already sufficient to dilate my cervix 3cm in under 2 hours. I managed to insist “no. more. Synto!” She reserved judgement, but it might have been the adrenaline kick I needed, as by 9.15pm I was having enormous contractions every 2-3 minutes. I could feel them as a giant swelling band of pain stretching around my whole belly and stretching lower. At this point I started vocalising “ah, ah, ah” throughout contractions, to help me ride the pain and stop me clenching down. I remember saying “if this isn’t transition, I’m in trouble!” I didn’t believe it could be transition, though – not so early, not when my first birth had taken almost 3 days. Our midwife said she thought we would have babies by 10pm, and I didn’t believe her.

I needed to get off the fit ball and change position, and asked if I could get on all fours, although the idea of moving seemed impossible to imagine. The hospital midwife set up a crash mat and a nice beanbag for me to lean on. I leaned forward and within one contraction of moving had started making some amazing noises. Unlike my “ah ah ahs” they were completely involuntary. And then I could feel twin 1 crowning. I did not believe it had happened so quickly, and cried out “what’s happening?” Everyone still makes fun of me for this. She was born in only a couple of pushes at 9.25pm, and our midwife had to tell the hospital midwife to put her gloves on to catch her. Our beautiful daughter, with a lovely round head, pink skin and a great big yell! There is a photo of me still on all fours, with a blissed-out grin. I could not believe how easy and quick it had been. I got to hold her straight away, but contractions started up again quite quickly, and she went to her daddy for some skin to skin time.

At this point the obstetricians arrived – a registrar and resident. I wanted to stay on the floor, but the registrar managed to persuade me up on the bed to check twin 2′s position, as we knew he was breech. Contractions started up again within minutes and were really agonising now, as I had lost my Calmbirth focus and as the position (twin 2′s spine to mine) had that sort of posterior feeling to it. But within seconds I was again feeling the inexorable urge to push. The OB flicked twin 2′s feet out as he was in a squatting position, the midwife and OB flexed twin 2′s head by pushing on my stomach and with a few mighty pushes he was out too, at 9.39pm. Our son! He was handed to me but unlike J, had a bit of trouble breathing, and spent some time in the special care nursery. He was back to us almost before we knew it. I must say he had a very breech-looking head, which looked like a mighty frown, but he’s ever so handsome and cheerful now.

J weighed in at 2.98kg (I was really ticked off she could not stretch to the extra 20gm), and P weighed 3.06kg, excellent weights for 36 weekers, let alone twins!

After twin 2 was out, I lost all patience for the pain – rather a pity as the Synto kept getting ramped up to deliver the placentas and then to deal with my uterus which did not want to shrink back down. I ended up with a Synto drip all night. I tell people this birth was meant to help me deal with my fear of Synto once and for all.

Both babies had beautiful breastfeeds within an hour or two of birth, which sadly was not an omen of things to come for twin 1, but it was lovely.


Anyway, that was our birth. Twins born without any pain relief (not even hot water) or really any intervention other than the induction drugs, with 4 hours of contractions total and only about 2 of those active labour. It wasn’t the birth I had wanted but it was a wonderful experience and very healing after my first daughter’s birth. I am so proud of myself, and look back on the birth with amazed gratitude all the time.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Choosing the best care provider for your needs

Choosing the best practitioner for your needs is a very important and personal decision. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong choice: some women will choose a private obstetrician, others will choose a private midwife and others will choose public hospital care. Some women will make an initial choice of care provider and decide to change care providers during the pregnancy. Other women will make one choice in their first pregnancy and then a different choice in a subsequent pregnancy. What’s important is to have an accurate understanding all the options available so that you can feel confident to choose the best option for your needs. The best people to talk to are the people who actually provide the service, rather than a GP who is removed from the actual services of an obstetrician / midwife / public hospital. Get referred to a private obstetrician or two; interview them; reflect on how you feel after meeting them. Go and visit your local public hospital. Have a tour and speak with the midwives there. And interview a couple of eligible midwives. You do not need a GP referral to see an eligible midwife and you can claim their services through medicare. An eligible midwife is a private midwife who has met an additional registration standard that enables them to have a Medicare provider number.

When you are considering a care provider, it’s also necessary to consider where you would like to give birth and to ensure that your care provider can attend you in your chosen setting. You might choose to birth your baby in a public hospital as a public or private patient, in a private hospital as a private patient, in a birth centre or at home. It can be helpful when trying to make a decision to write down a list of questions you may have and also consider what is important to you as you make your choices. For example:

What do I want from my care?
What type of practitioner would I feel most comfortable with?
What do I need from my practitioner to feel comfortable and safe?
Do I want public or private care?
Is continuity of care important to me?

These are questions only you can answer. Other questions are for your care providers to answer with you, and it’s a good idea to interview a few care providers – midwives and obstetricians – before making a choice. Midwives and obstetricians will charge a fee for interviews and you are able to claim this through Medicare (your midwife will need to be eligible in order for you to claim a Medicare benefit). It is important during the interview that you ask all the questions that are on your mind, and to be aware of how you feel throughout the interview. Your care provider should inspire you with confidence, help you to feel at ease and comfortable, and the appointment should feel unhurried.

Likewise, your care provider may like to “interview” you, and this is so that your care provider can be sure that s/he can meet your needs. Maternity care is provided in a partnership and so it’s important that both parties feel really comfortable with the other.

There are many questions you might wish to ask your care provider; the best suggestion is to consider what is important to you and write a list of questions.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

First-time mums learn the hard way: informed mums choose private midwives

A recent article has suggested that first-time mums have overly unrealistic ideas about their birth – that it will be a natural, uncomplicated birth, when in reality it is not, for the majority. We know that women choosing care through the general hospital system will experience high rates of interventions, leading ultimately to a caesarean. But few women know that if they engage a private midwife for a hospital or homebirth, they will experience much lower rates of intervention, but with the same level of safety. Care with an eligible private midwife will attract medicare benefits, and obstetric care is readily available if it is needed. The article below described one woman’s experience of general hospital care. I can only assume that this reporter has written the article in response to the outcry about the original research.

HERVEY Bay first-time mum Jasmine Adame has experienced first-hand just how difficult childbirth can be.

And she agrees with new research … that suggests that many first-time mums are unprepared for the realities of a complicated labour.

Jasmine delivered her little girl … at Hervey Bay Hospital after spending a day and a half in labour.

In the end, she was told her labour had stalled and she had to have an emergency caesarean.

We are not told how long labour stalled for, whether she had her own midwife with her throughout her labour (unlikely since this is not available to most women through the general hospital system) and we are also not told how far through her labour she was. It is true that some caesareans are performed for “failure to progress” when the woman’s cervix is less than 3 centimeters dilated, indicating that she is not yet in established labour.

Jasmine had attended antenatal classes prior to having her first child and said it was the midwives who held these classes who gave her the best idea of what labour was actually going to be like.

Hospital classes are great at telling women about hospital policies, but independent childbirth education will inspire women with confidence about what their bodies are capable of, with the right support.

“I knew it wasn’t going to be fun.

“But I didn’t expect it to be as horrid as it was,” she said.

It sounds like she didn’t have the care of a midwife who was known and trusted. Most women I work with will experience their labour extremely positively, as if it was the best (hardest and most challenging, but oh so rewarding) experience of their life.

… The chances of having a medically uncomplicated birth were actually 21%.

This applies to women birthing in the general hospital system, where they will not be cared for by one midwife who is known to them, chosen by them and trusted by them. The chance of a medically uncomplicated birth when a woman chooses private midwifery care is around 70% – 80%. This is a huge difference.

Because she had been focused on a natural delivery, the decision to deliver the baby by caesarean took Jasmine by surprise – and the time between the decision and the birth was very swift, allowing her little time to adjust …

This is addressed during care with a private midwife, where there is ample time to explore all options and possibilities, so that there are few surprises on the day (or night!). Hour-long appointments allow plenty of time for questions and education. The possibility of a first-time mum “needing” a caesarean in the general hospital system is 25%, or one in four. Given this large minority, we would think that all women going through the hospital system would be thoroughly appraised of this possibility. In my private practice, a mere 3% first-time mums need a caesarean. This is not because we push the boundaries of safety: it is because women who are well supported, well-informed, relaxed and confident about their birth will generally start labour on their own at term, labour normally and birth their babies unassisted by any instruments or operations.

Hopefully Jasmine will choose private midwifery care with her next pregnancy (private midwifery care is available for a planned hospital birth), where she can expect an 80% – 90% chance of a vaginal birth following her caesarean in her first pregnancy. Or will she choose to go back to the general hospital system, where she has a mere 15% chance of a vaginal birth?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage

Link

No previous study has focused on true physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Physiological third stage is often chosen by women who birth at home or in a birth centre, however hospital policies urge active management of the third stage (injection of syntocinon, immediate clamping and cutting of the cord and then pulling the placenta out) because studies have shown that this form of management reduces bleeding. However, it is unfortunate that those studies have either a) not clearly defined physiological management or b) have not managed the “physiological” third stages in a physiological manner. Hence, those studies have shown that active management is the safer option and hospitals have gone with those recommendations.

This study clearly defines what is meant by physiological management and also the women who are suitable for physiological management. Some women are at a higher risk of PPH and so active management was recommended to those women in the study.

The study compared active management which was standard at the tertiary hospital, with physiological management which was the norm at the free-standing birth centre. At the tertiary unit, 11.2% low-risk women experienced a PPH. At the midwifery-led unit, where physiological management was practiced, PPH only occurred in 2.8% women. Active management was associated with 11.5% PPHs compared with physiological management which was 1.7% PPHs. Active management was associated with a seven to eight fold increase in PPH for low-risk women.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Do first-time mothers have unrealistic views about having uncomplicated births, or does the health system fail them?

An interesting report in The Telegraph states that first-time mums have unrealistic expectations of drug-free, natural, uncomplicated births, when in reality, they have a mere 21% chance of:

  • a labour that starts on its own (ie, is not induced
  • not using an epidural
  • birthing without the use of instruments or operations
  • If we exclude from that figure the proportion of women who also birth without stitches, that figure becomes a mere 8%. The papers would like us to believe that

    first-time mothers have unrealistic views about having uncomplicated births, increasing the risk of post-natal depression

    In other words, postnatal depression is caused by womens’ unmet and unrealistic expectations of an uncomplicated birth.

    The suggests that health system has no part to play in this. It is merely a case of women wanting too much from their experience. If we expect too much, we set ourselves up for disappointment, and this leads to postnatal depression!

    Wow!

    The article goes on to say that

    expectant mothers … believe there is a 56.2 per cent chance of an uncomplicated birth, which means a baby being born without the use of forceps, suction cups, caesarean section or induced labour.

    Whereas

    the chance of having a medically uncomplicated birth is 21 per cent.

    A further 30.7 per cent said they believed women would have uncomplicated births without needing sutures. The actual figure is 8 per cent.

    My readers will well know that I don’t subscribe to the view that a crappy birth experience and postnatal depression is all the fault of the health service; but at the same time, it’s not all the fault of the woman either.

    We’re each responsible for the choices we make and for informing ourselves of all available options before we make a choice. Health services are also responsible for accurately representing their services and outcomes so that women can make a considered choice. If women have a mere 8% chance of birthing normally and without stitches, that needs to be well-known so that women may seek other care options if they so choose.

    The health system is here to provide a basic and safe level of care. If we expect or desire more than what can be considered “basic”, then we do need to look into other options, and these will generally be found in the private system, be it private midwifery care or private obstetric care (although I dare say that the average private obstetrician will have lower rates of normal birth that a public service).

    All of that said, it seems appalling that 79% first-time Mums go through the public system and come out the other side with an intervened-with birth. In my private practice, those figures are reversed. Do women know what they are signing up for when the choose their local hospital for care? And perhaps more importantly, should the hospitals be held to account for these poor outcomes, or at least acknowledge that they are failing women?

    Most first-time mums should expect to birth without intervention. Most should not need any intervention. The birthing process is a normal, natural, female bodily function. We don’t question the potential for our bodies to ovulate, urinate, digest food, menstruate, circulate blood, metabolise substances and so on. These processes generally “work”; birth generally “works” too. Provided we, as care providers, don’t mess it up with unnecessary interventions and an environment that is not conducive to labouring and birthing a baby.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    An amazing homebirth story

    Isabel is an amazing, strong woman who came to me for pregnancy care. She had planned to move overseas, and as you’ll read, her pregnancy came as a surprise. She planned a homebirth with a midwife overseas – but the story has a twist in it! We went about the pregnancy, preparing thoroughly for an active, natural and drug-free birth. I was thrilled to receive Isabel’s birth story, and she has kindly agreed to share it here.

    Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home. Now it is my turn to write the story I have been so looking forward to… I hope I help inspire another mum-to-be to have the great confidence in her own ability and her body’s ability to birth her baby safely and naturally…love Isabel xx

    Our beautiful birth story of baby Zachary by Isabel and Jed

    It started in mid-April when I noticed an unusual change in my body. I pee-ed my pants when I sneezed. Even though I have a very weak bladder control and recurrent cystitis I had never done that before. I decided to get a urine test and after 4 weak positives I decided the product was defective and I needed to go see a real doctor tomorrow.
    Half way through a busy day at work as a Veterinarian, caring for animals, it hit me that I might be pregnant and that we weren’t really ready for this big change in our lives. I broke down and cried. I left work early to go see the doctor. Jed met me at the clinic and we saw the doctor together. The doctor promptly told me, “My Dear, there isn’t such a thing as false positive results. Only false negative are possible. You ARE pregnant!”

    I guess at that point both Jed and I had a lot of conflicting feelings. We had only just gotten married less than a month ago. We had a wedding dinner to attend in Malaysia followed by a honeymoon which required us to trek over 4000km up a mountain. At the same time it was such a big surprise and blessing to know that we were able to have a baby. We both set about sorting through our feelings and thoughts for a couple of weeks before letting the rest of the family and friends know about it.

    It was a smooth pregnancy and we had amazing help and support from friends and family. We learnt so much from our lovely midwife, Melissa Maimann and our ante natal teacher, Julie Clarke. It was basically life changing. I had known I would have needed to hit the books for this but who would have thought I find so much conflicting information. It was hard making the right choices. It was doubly hard to not have my sisters around which I rely on so much for guidance. Jed was so good and read everything I told him to. I only had to chuck temper tantrums once a month. =)

    In the end, I decided I wanted to have a home birth because I dislike being told what to do with regards to my body and I strongly dislike needles. I spent a lot of time visualising what my ideal birth/labour would be like and tried to get the support network I needed to achieve this dream. It wasn’t easy finding medical people to agree so in the end I realised it would probably just be Jed, Alicia and my mom helping me. I prayed to whoever was listening that everything would go smoothly and I that neither Zachary or I would not need medical help.

    Fast forward about 9 months to December, my mucus plug came out throughout the day on the 13th with no signs of labour. So we decided to head over to the homeopath for back up help if needed to get the contractions going.
    Almost a week later, on the 22nd of December my waters broke at 2am. It was such a surreal feeling as I sneezed and wet the bed. I was surprised at how wet the bed was and decided to stand up and this big gush of clear warm water ran down my legs. I then realised that my waters had broken and that I would be meeting my baby today.
    I woke Jed up and told him the news. Since there were no signs of contractions once again I decided to take the homeopathic remedy and we both went back to sleep.

    By 4am, I was uncomfortable enough to wake up and walk around. I emptied my bowels multiple times and drank lots of water and ate some fruit. At 5am I woke Jed up and told him to pump up the exercise ball and warm up the heat packs. By 6am, contractions were regular and about 15 minutes apart, Jed started filling up the bath tub. However, there was no hot water because the water heater had been turned off. So off he woke mom up to take over comforting me and went to boil many many pots of water.

    I sat on the bathroom floor rocking on the exercise ball and constantly visualising a soft open cervix and my baby descending nicely. I breathed nicely through each contraction remember our Calmbirth classes.
    Heat packs placed on the lower back and under the belly helped with the discomfort as well.
    The exercise ball was good for sleeping and resting on between contractions. Around 7 o’clock the bath tub was finally ready, got in and felt lots better. Alicia came shortly after and took over from mom. She gave awesome back rubs and was such a grounding energy which was exactly what I needed to get things done. Things went quickly after that.

    Jed got into the water around 8am and I knelt down with my arms wrapped around him. Contractions were about 5 minutes apart then and required a lot more attention. I kept reminding myself that each contraction meant one step closer to seeing Zachary. I felt him slowly pressing down on my cervix and my cervix dilating.
    Vocalising helped during the contractions. Jed was a great help reminding me to breathe and not hold my breath.
    He was like a rock I knew I could rely on. Did a few self vaginal exams and could feel Zachary’s head progressing downwards.
    At about 8.20am I realised I was in transition, his head was crowning and I wasn’t fully dilated. Was upset and freaked out but Alicia reminded me to trust in my body. Took a deep breath and focused on opening my cervix up. A few minutes later I was ready to push, Zachary came out head first with a hand. I rested for a few seconds till the next contractions came and looked up at Jed and said “Are you ready? He is coming.” Jed caught Zachary Francis McKenna at 8.38am
    We were both ecstatic and sat there admiring for a while. He started crying almost immediately and looked around at all of us.
    Stood up and tried to birth placenta but couldn’t so I went back to the room. He started feeding soon after and I was enjoying his skin to skin contact. The doctor arrived soon after he advised us to clamp the cord and get the placenta out.
    Jed was frantic and really wanted the placenta out because he was worried about bleeding. I was getting a little annoyed by his constant fussing. We clamped the cord and Jed cut it. The doctor applied gentle traction and got the placenta out. Finally we were left alone for some quiet time.

    I would like to thank my lovely husband for supporting me through the pregnancy and birth and agreeing to a home birth and studying so hard.
    I would also like to thank Melissa and Julie for their teachings which allowed me to have the confidence to do this, although neither of them endorsed free birthing they were not judgmental.

    No amount of thank you can express my gratitude for having Alicia around to show me there were many options and that we need to take charge of our own births.
    Many thanks to my Mom and Dad for allowing me to use their house. Last of all, Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Baby’s Weight Affected By Mothers’ Weight Before And During Pregnancy

    Link

    A new study … reveals that both pre-pregnant weight (body mass index, BMI) and weight gain in pregnancy are important predictors of babies’ birthweight. This is important since high birthweight may also predict adult overweight.

    … Results of the study showed that birthweight of the newborn child increased with increasing maternal pre-pregnant BMI, and that offspring birthweight also increased with increasing weight gain of the mother during pregnancy.

    Every increase in one kg of pre-pregnancy BMI increased birthweight with 22.4 g. A subsequent increase in weight gain during pregnancy of 10 kg increased birthweight with 224 g.

    … “Encouraging women to attain a healthy weight before conception and keep a moderate weight gain during pregnancy is important to avoid high or excessive birthweight in offspring,” …

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Simulator to predict chance of caesarean?

    Link

    Traditionally, doctors and midwives have used a technique called pelvimetry to measure the pelvis and try to determine its adequacy for giving birth. But pelvic size is just one factor in how smoothly labor will go, rendering the method largely insufficient.

    Scientists in France have been working to take some of the guesswork out of labor predictions … their newly developed software, called Predibirth, predicts birth outcomes quite accurately.

    The researchers used their software to process magnetic resonance images of 24 pregnant women, capturing the pelvis and fetus, and then simulating 72 possible trajectories the baby’s head might take through the birth canal. The program then uses this data to score the mother’s chances of having a normal (vaginal) birth.

    … Of the 24 women in the study, the 13 who delivered normally all had highly favorable birth outcome scores. Three women who had high-risk scores underwent elective C-sections. Of the five women who underwent emergency C-section, the three with obstructed labor had high-risk scores, and the two who experienced heart rhythm abnormalities had mildly favorable or favorable scores.

    More accurate measurements of labor risks might not only keep C-section rates lower and help identify necessary C-sections before they become emergencies, but these measurements could also better inform those who want to deliver at home whether it is safe to do so.

    I wonder if all of those women had undergone extensive preparation for birth and had sought continuity of midwifery care? Of 24 women, only 13 delivered vaginally. That is only 54%! Private midwifery care generally had rates of normal birth up around 90%.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Hospital births for healthy women? What does the research say?

    The recent Birthplace Study was the first of its kind to compare outcomes for low-risk, healthy women who gave birth in midwife-led units (both alongside and freestanding), obstetric units and at home. My previous blog post described the findings for first-time Mums birthing at home, but what did the findings say about hospital birth?

    The study is extremely positive and shows that birth is generally very safe for mothers and babies who are low risk and healthy. In fact, the chance of something going very wrong for the baby was so low that the researchers had to combine mortality and morbidity to get any meaningful data. There were so few deaths in the study (38 out of nearly 65,000 births) that they had to combine a host of adverse outcomes in order to come up with any statistically significant results. Therefore the “primary outcome” included baby deaths and serious morbidity (injury / illness) to the baby. Overall, a low risk woman had a 4.3/1,000 risk of having a “primary outcome” (that is, death or serious injury to the baby). For women birthing in hospital, the figure was 4.4/1,000 and was actually lower for babies born at home and in midwifery-led units. Imagine that: the risk to the baby overall was highest in hospital!

    Breaking this down further, if we look at first-time Mums separately to second and subsequent time Mums, the figures look different. First time Mums had a 5.3/1,000 chance of a “primary outcome” overall. This rose to 9.3/1,000 for women who planned to birth at home, and fell to 4.5 for women birthing in a midwifery-led unit. It was 5.3/1,000 for first-time mums who birthed in hospital. Again, we see that hospital birth confers some increased risk for first time Mums.

    Now looking at women birthing for the second (or subsequent) time, we find that the overall risk of a “primary outcome” was very low: 3.1/1,000. This was higher in an obstetric (hospital) unit at 3.3/1,000, lower in a midwifery-led unit (2.7/1,000) and lowest for women birthing at home (2.3/1,000). So once again, the study is showing that hospital is not the safest place to birth a baby if you are a low-risk, healthy women.

    If you are having your first baby and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is in a midwifery unit, and if you have birthed before and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is at home.

    Of course, midwifery units have limited capabilities to provide higher levels of care, and as labour and birth are unpredictable, there needs to be robust transfer arrangements in place. Some 10-45% of women transfer in birth. This figure is lowest for women who have birthed before, and highest in first-time Mums. As well as robust transfer arrangements, women – particularly first-time Mums – need to be aware of the chance of transfer and to be comfortable with this possibility. This is best accommodated if the woman can transfer in with her own midwife.

    What were the intervention rates like?

    Not surprisingly, intervention rates were highest in women who planned a hospital birth. 93% women who planned a homebirth had a normal birth, versus only 74% women in the hospital. 11% had a caesarean in the obstetric (hospital) unit, versus a mere 2.8% in women who planned a home birth. 24% women had their labours sped up with a syntocinon drip in the planned hospital birth group, versus only 5% in the women who planned a homebirth. 31% women had an epidural in the planned hospital birth group, versus 8% at home. And of course, episiotomy rates were lowest at home.

    It is clear that being in hospital greatly increases risks for all low risk mothers compared to being at home or in a midwife led unit (either alongside or freestanding).

    It is clear that low-risk women have much to gain by planning a birth with midwives in a birth centre or some other form of midwifery-led care. Planned homebirth does increase the risks to the babies of first-time Mums, with an increase in adverse outcomes for babies from about 0.5% to just under 1%. But what is it about planning a homebirth that increases the risk to the baby? The study used intention to treat analysis, so we are not able to know how many of those adverse outcomes occurred in those who transferred to hospital after a planned homebirth, versus those that happened in the births that actually occurred at home. We do know that the outcomes of homebirth transfers are generally worse than those who had been planned to occur in hospital, and first-time Mums are more likely to transfer. We also know that birth is generally riskier for a first-time Mum than a woman who has birthed before.

    Regardless, the study is extremely positive in supporting the role of primary midwifery care and the excellent outcomes that low-risk women can achieve when they choose a midwife as their care provider. Imagine the benefits as well for high-risk women who receive midwifery care with appropriate and timely obstetric care.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Expecting mothers prefer midwife-led labour

    Link

    Most women should be offered midwife-led care that uses fewer interventions and is just as safe as the consultant-led model, a major study recommends.

    The study, commissioned by the Health Service Executive and conducted by the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Trinity College Dublin, found most women prefer midwife-led units.

    It also discovered the number of babies requiring resuscitation at birth or admission to the special care baby unit was the same for both groups of women.

    Almost six in 10 women in the consultant-led units (57%) had their labours speeded up by either having their waters broken or having oxytocin given intravenously by a drip, compared to only four in 10 women in the midwife-led units.

    The study involved 1,653 women who had babies in the HSE Dublin North-East region from 2004 to 2007 and compared the consultant-led maternity care with a new model of care provided in two integrated midwifery-led units in Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda and Cavan General Hospital.

    The two midwife-led units, which have hotel-like private rooms with birthing pools, were opened in response to recommendations made in the Minder Report in 2001 to provide more choice in maternity care in the north-east.

    … fewer women in the midwifery-led unit group chose pain-relieving epidurals in labour.

    Despite having fewer epidurals, 83% of women in the midwife-led units were satisfied with their pain relief compared with 68% of women in the consultant-led unit.

    “When women are supported by one-to-one midwifery care, are encouraged to labour gently at their own pace and have the pain-relieving benefits of relaxing in warm water, they are far better able to tolerate pain and labour more effectively,” …

    The study found that 85% of women attending the midwife-led unit would recommend the care they had received to a friend, compared to 70% having the usual care.

    Although facilities in the midwifery-led units were quite luxurious, the cost of care for each women was €332.80 less than in the usual hospital system.

    A recent KPMG report on maternity care in the greater Dublin region also recommended the introduction of midwifery-led units throughout the country.

    These results have been found in other studies, particularly the claim around pain relief. It is interesting that epidurals don’t equate with a more positive birth experience; rather, a woman who feels well-prepared and who is supported with one-to-one midwifery care in a drug-free birth, will rate her birth as being highly satisfying.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Decision-making: Heart and Head

    Through my practice, I have a lot of women coming to me who are experiencing conflict with regards to the choices they have made for their pregnancy and birth. Typically, they find (sometimes quite late in their pregnancy) that perhaps the choice they made right back at the start of their pregnancy, no longer works for the, or the choice that they made was perhaps not as well informed as they thought it was. Some women find it hard to take the attitude of interviewing potential care providers before pregnancy (or very early in pregnancy) and then choosing the midwife or obstetrician who is best able to meet their needs. The end result can often be a woman who chooses an obstetrician with the goal of a natural birth, only to discover that their doctor will only “deliver” their baby if they’re on their back in bed with an epidural in place. Or that induction is performed by 40 weeks, or that all women have their waters broken and all first time Mums have an episiotomy or so on. And sometimes, the more reading a woman does, the more she realises that this is not what she wants.

    I often ask the question, “What was it that made you decide on this particular care provider?”

    And the responses are generally very interesting.

    • My GP referred me
    • My mother / sister / friend / neighbour used this midwife and she said she’s wonderful
    • Well, when I got pregnant I went to my GP. She asked me if I have private health insurance and I said yes, so she wrote a referral to Dr XX.

    I ask these women if they considered any other options. “What options?” comes the response.

    I’m amazed that with the marvels of modern technology, internet etc, women don’t know they have other options. We have options with all sorts of things in life, and we don’t shy away from discovering them either! It seems to be to be an interesting handing-over of responsibility when it comes to pregnancy and birth, and I’m curious why it happens with pregnancy and birth, but not in other aspects of life. Do we buy a particular computer – that can’t meet our needs – because it was recommended and we didn’t know there were other computers on the market? Do we buy a large house when we need a small house because it was recommended by the real estate agent?

    In most other situations where choices are involved, people will engage in a process of assessing options.

    We might list all the possible options and then assess each option across a range of qualities.

    We ask questions.

    We consider what it is that we really want, and then match it to what’s available, seeking the most compatible choice.

    But sadly, this does not happen with pregnancy and birth. Perhaps it should?

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Natural birth in hospital?

    Here are some ideas to birth naturally in hospital:

    Read, read, read. Books, websites, any written info from your care provider … read it all. You also need to know the difference between facts presented to you in an honest and unbiased way, and facts that are being filtered through hospital policy. This is where women benefit from having a private midwife by their side.

    For example, “Some risks rise slightly when a woman has high blood pressure. I am uncomfortable with letting your pregnancy continue with high blood pressure because of the risks to the baby and to you if something happens” is an honest and factual statement. You have the right to accept the risks and refuse induction. However, some women hear “I’m going to induce you today because if we don’t do this now, there is a good chance your baby will not make it”. This statement is dishonest, using a woman’s fears and her maternal instinct to encourage her to accept intervention. There is also no discussion of alternative options. Informed consent requires that women are presented with options so that they can make the best decision for them, in their situation.

    Be assertive As with most human relationships, a great deal can be resolved with a calm, respectful and firm manner. Know what you want and why you want it. Engage a private midwife to assist you with obtaining relevant and impartial information.

    Listen. If you are choosing to use a hospital and an obstetrician for your birth, then you acknowledge that their presence, education and experience have some value. Your wishes are important but be willing to listen even when what’s being said is really not what you want to hear. You must also acknowledge that an obstetrician is trained in all things that go wrong, and they are on the look-out for any sign of things going wrong. Midwives, on the other hand, will promote normalcy and assist your pregnancy and birth to remain normal. These differing philosophies do result in big differences in intervention rates.

    Be Flexible. Understand that sometimes things don’t go the way we had planned. There might be some occasions where you’ll be happy to accommodate the hospital policy, and other times when you’ll want to stand your ground.

    Ultimately, it is true that the most important aspect of birth is safety and a healthy mother and baby. But that doesn’t mean the other aspects are unimportant, and I firmly believe you can have a great birth – and a safe birth – in any location.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Charging women for non-medical caesareans?

    Link

    The health minister has said that women in Northern Ireland who choose to have a Caesarean for non-medical reasons may have to pay for the operation.

    Edwin Poots is launching a consultation on a review of maternity services.

    Women at low risk will be encouraged to consider having their baby in a midwife-led unit or at home, if appropriate.

    Around 30% of deliveries are by Caesarean section – the highest level in the UK and Ireland.

    … giving birth was a natural process and superb assistance was available to help women through the delivery.

    “It costs several thousand pounds more for a Caesarean section so there are savings to be made,” …

    “… what we want to encourage, is more people to give birth naturally because it has better outcomes for the mother and the baby.

    … “We want to ensure that people take the natural choice where they can and to have that back up where they need Caesarean section to take place.”

    … At present, women who elect to go private to have a Caesarean on non-medical grounds pay for their pre and post-natal care.

    But the cost of the delivery is met by the health service.

    … women will be encouraged to have their baby in a midwife led unit

    “If you want to go down that route, if you want to pay for it, it is totally up to yourself, but I don’t feel that we the public in Northern Ireland should be paying additional money for people to have the choice.”

    The minister said he expected to see a “considerable” number of midwifery units being established.

    “A lot of them would be set up in association with the main maternity unit, so they would be on the same site as existing hospitals,” …

    “Women would be giving birth totally with the midwives but there would be a fallback position of having an obstetrician nearby if things do not work out.”

    Breedagh Hughes from the Royal College of Midwives said the focus was on trying to “normalise” child birth.

    … “One of the things we hope will come out in the review will be asking trusts to look at … the reasons for the Caesarean sections and to focus on trying to prevent women from having that first Caesarean section, which very often leads to the old adage – ‘once a section always a section’.”

    She said a “fear” of child birth stopped many women from choosing a natural birth.

    “When one in every three women gives birth by Caesarean section, you lose that critical mass of people who know what it is like to give birth normally, and women are losing confidence in their own body’s ability to give birth,” she said.

    Ms Hughes also welcomed proposals to shift the focus to midwife led care.

    “I think if women are given the opportunity to get to know and trust their midwife and to trust their own bodies, we’re more likely to see women saying, ‘OK, this is what nature intended me for and this is what I’m going to do’,” …

    Visit my website to explore birthing services

    6 essential tips for a natural birth

    Choosing a natural birth can be the most empowering and transformational experience in a woman’s life. In our culture, childbirth is viewed as a medical event and an emergency waiting to happen. We only have to turn on the TV and we witness birth being portrayed as a major emergency, and thank goodness those doctors were there to save the mother and baby.

    As well as this, when we ask our mothers about their births, we’re bound to hear more horror stories. Forceps, stirrups, the dreaded episiotomy. Shaves, enemas, being bound to bed, not allowed to get up, let alone even sit up. Nothing to eat or drink. Husbands were not present. Is it any wonder that we are so fearful of birth?

    Fear guides many birth experiences and results in the overuse of interventions and medications. As a result many women feel out of control and dis-empowered by their birth experience. It doesn’t have to be that way.

    When you take responsibility for the outcome of your birth experience by becoming educated, exploring all your options, consciously choosing and creating what you want, and taking the right steps to prepare yourself, you ultimately will transform yourself and your family.

    The following suggestions are designed to help you prepare to have the best birth experience possible:

    1. Understand and trust the process of birth
    If you understand what is happening with your body during labour, you will have more confidence and a better ability to cope. Trusting the process and knowing that everything is as it should be, is the key to “letting go” and allowing birth to happen normally and naturally. But before you can trust, you have to know what to expect. Seeking out independent childbirth education classes is the key.

    2. Good nutrition
    Good nutrition is essential to good health. The food we put in our mouths today will build the cells of tomorrow. In pregnancy, the food we eat also builds our baby, so we have an added responsibility to ensure that nutrition is optimal.

    3. Exercise
    Birth is a physical event. Staying fit can minimise pregnancy discomforts and ease the birth process. Walking or swimming and prenatal yoga are very beneficial to the health of you and your baby.

    4. Relax
    The key to dealing with labour is your ability to relax. Your body instinctively knows what to do and releases hormones that help you cope in labour. It is when you become scared or tense, that you interfere with the natural process and pain increases. Relaxation takes concentration and practice. I recommend Calmbirth to all women who plan a natural birth.

    5. Address fears and concerns
    We are constantly bombarded with negative images and stories of childbirth. Over time these messages can become ingrained in our way of thinking. It is important to recognise our attitudes and beliefs and understand how they shape our experiences. Any negative thoughts or beliefs about childbirth should be explored prior to giving birth.

    6. Care provider

    Your choice of care provider has a great impact on the sort of birth you will have, despite points 1 – 5 above. Having strong support throughout pregnancy and birth is critical in positively influencing the outcome of your experience. Interview and select your care provider to ensure a good “fit”. Consider engaging a private midwife to maximise your chance of a natural birth, if this is your aim. If you do not feel supported, make the necessary changes no matter how far along you are in your pregnancy.

    Birth is natural and women have done it for centuries. But in today’s society, a birth without preparation may not be the one you envisioned. You have all the resources available to help you prepare for the birth experience you desire. You can choose to become empowered by your birth experience or you can give your power away. It’s up to you.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Is caesarean now the ‘normal’ way to give birth, and should we be worried?

    Link

    There’s no doubt that caesarean sections are an essential procedure that can save the lives of women and babies. But around one in three Australian women will give birth by caesarean section – and that’s not just to save lives.

    … The rising caesarean section rate in most of the developed world has not resulted in reduced rates of stillbirth or infant death – quite the contrary.

    One Australian study showed that babies were more likely to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit if they were born by elective caesarean section than other types of delivery. A previous caesarean section also increases the risk of stillbirth.

    In terms of outcomes for women, those who have emergency and elective cesarean sections are less likely to exclusively breastfeed. And there is growing evidence that caesarean operations increase the risk of the mother dying or becoming ill with blood loss, blood clots, abdominal organ injury and the need for a hysterectomy.

    It’s important to consider the risks of caesarean births. But rather than just focus on the polarised “vaginal birth vs caesarean birth” debate – which pitches doctors against midwives, and doesn’t help women who are stuck in the middle – we need to focus on the ways we can support all women to have the best outcome from childbirth.

    It seems that one of the driving forces behind the rising caesarean section rate is fear … about labour and birth, and from doctors and midwives who are themselves fearful of the birthing process.

    … we should be examining why women are fearful of labour and birth and what our health system can do to reduce this fear.

    Our health system is generally an unfriendly one for pregnant women and it’s likely that this compounds the fear of birth. It’s common for a pregnant woman receiving care in the public system to see up to 30 different caregivers through pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period.

    The opportunity for pregnant women to develop a meaningful relationship with her health care provider, discuss her fears, affirm her needs and develop confidence in labour and birth are minimal.

    … One of the disturbing elements of birth in the 21st century is the lack of respect for privacy for labouring women. The entourage of people appearing uninvited into labour rooms in most hospitals is astonishing. Each labour and birth can have a multitude of spectators, including a midwife, obstetrician, registrar, resident, student midwife, medical student and on it goes.

    … To address this problem and encourage Australian women to give birth normally, … In NSW, the Towards Normal Birth Policy was released last year and provides 10 steps towards supporting more women to go into labour and ultimately have a normal birth.

    The policy recognises that ”… unnecessary interference in the natural process may disturb the expected course and may lead to a cascade of intervention.”

    The challenge is to redesign the health system to facilitate women’s confidence and trust in birth. Fundamental changes need to occur to ensure all women are supported during pregnancy and feel confident in their ability to give birth, including:

  • Continuity of caregiver;
  • Increased options for the style of birth, with access to a birthing pool;
  • A positive environment, free of disruptions; and
  • One-to-one midwifery care in labour so women are never left alone or fearful.
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant. Who should I go to for care? A Midwife or an Obstetrician?

    Private Midwife:

  • Provides autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care for women who are experiencing normal, healthy pregnancies
  • Provides care in consultation with an obstetrician when a woman’s pregnancy has risk factors (eg high blood pressure, prem labour, concern for baby’s growth, gestational diabetes etc)
  • Transfers responsibility for care to an obstetrician if complications emerge and continues to provide care within the midwifery scope of practice
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Private Obstetrician:

  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Receives referrals from midwives for women with risk-associated pregnancies or births
  • Always provides labour and birth care (including caesarean) in collaboration with a midwife
  • Obstetric care on average results in a high degree of intervention such as induction, epidural, caesarean and episiotomy
  • Provides brief in-hospital consultations after the baby is born, followed by a 6-week check
  • Pregnancy appointments are generally no more than 15 minutes in duration
  • Collaborative care: private midwife and private obstetrician

  • Receive autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care from one midwife and one obstetrician regardless of risk factors
  • No transfer of care if risk factors emerge
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Supports women to birth naturally, including with twins, a breech baby or a VBAC
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Mum sent home in taxi four hours after birth

    Link

    ON Monday night, Casey Benger gave birth to a beautiful little boy at … Hospital.

    Four hours later they were on their way home.

    The taxi driver who collected the mum and her new baby was outraged that she would be released in the middle of the night so soon after giving birth, but the hospital says it’s normal practice.

    … under the community midwifery program, if a mother has given birth before, if it was a vaginal birth, and the delivery was uncomplicated, the mother and baby can go home four hours after the delivery.

    … “I was a bit shocked at first and asked if it would be better to stay …”

    “The staff are under a lot of pressure up there. They were very busy with people coming and going …

    This is the experience for many women birthing in the public system where resources are stretched. Women can expect to be discharged home between 4 and 48 hours following birth, with some follow-up at home.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Hospital births continuing through our service

    Given the troubled times for midwives attending hospitals in a birth support role – either for planned hospital birth or in a homebirth transfer situation – I have had many calls from current clients and women who are exploring their birthing options, asking if hospital births are still going ahead through this service. I wanted to provide reassurance that yes, my hospital birth service is continuing! I am continuing to take bookings for hospital birth and I am able to attend hospital births in the full capacity of a midwife.

    Owing to an ongoing collaborative agreement and hospital arrangements, hospital births are continuing. Women book with me early in their pregnancy and have all of their care with me. Women also see an obstetrician twice in their pregnancy. Birthing takes place in a hospital setting complete with waterbirthing. We support VBAC, twin and breech births. It is an all-risk model too, so women don’t need to be “low risk” to benefit from continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. It also means that there is no “transfer” if a woman’s pregnancy becomes high risk: she can still receive the same wonderful care and support from her chosen midwife and obstetrician.

    Hospital staff are not routinely involved in the care of women who book through our service and we have gone to great lengths to create a birth centre feel to the birthing rooms. Rooms are quiet, warm and peaceful and we have a variety of tools available to support natural, active birthing such as floor mats, bath, shower and birth balls and of course many women also choose to bring personal items from home.

    After the baby is born, we support early discharge with many women choosing to go home four hours after the birth. Of course women may stay longer if they wish. I visit daily for the first week, twice in the second week and then weekly until discharge at 6 weeks.

    Should there be any issues along the way, we have ready access to a specialist obstetrician who is known to the woman from pregnancy.

    So the short answer is YES! I am able to continue to attend hospital births and am receiving many calls about the popular model of care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Well-off mothers spend thousands on private midwives

    An article
    from the UK explains that women are spending thousands of pounds on private midwives to achieve the ‘perfect’ birth. The situation is not too different to the Australian experience.

    In the UK, private midwives charge between £1,800 and £5,000 for a birth, but their services are in high demand from professional, well-educated women who have become disenchanted with the hospital experience. The number of mothers paying for private midwives to attend home births has tripled in the last eight years.

    Demand has become so high in parts of London and the South East that some expectant mothers have been unable to find a private midwife to assist them.

    Many of the expectant mothers are older and have been put off by previous experiences in NHS maternity wards.

    Women who engage private midwives claim they can form a relationship with one person rather than seeing a succession of strangers.

    Midwives understand that women want continuity of care and someone to talk to them and answer their questions. Women don’t want routine and unnecessary interventions in their pregnancy and birth, and they want more extensive postnatal care.

    The Australian experience is the same as that in the UK. Women seek private midwifery care for home birth or hospital birth so that they can form a relationship with one person who will be with them from their first antenatal appointment, through to birth and 6 weeks after their baby is born.

    In Australia, eligible midwives can provide medicare-funded care which makes private midwifery care more affordable to women, thanks to the maternity reforms.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    “I’ve been told my baby is big”

    and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

    An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

    In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

    Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

    The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

    The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

    It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

    I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

    A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

    My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Dutch abandon home birth

    A recent article informs us that:

    RISK OF DEATH INDUCES DUTCH WOMEN TO ABANDON HOME BIRTHS

    It goes on to say that in the last 10 years, the percentage of Dutch women who are giving birth in hospitals has risen from 37% to 75%. They state that reasons for this include:

  • concern at the disproportionally high baby death rate in home birth
  • the rising popularity of epidurals, a pain relief option in labour which is only available in hospitals.
  • The Dutch system of home births has been promoted as one which other countries should emulate, including New Zealand. However, last year a large study found that the perinatal death rate was greater in low risk women who were cared for by midwives than in higher risk women who were cared for by obstetricians. The researchers concluded that the Dutch system of risk selection is not as effective as was once thought.

    I have read the study that has been referred to above. The study concludes that:

    The main finding of this study is that the Dutch obstetric system that is based on risk selection and obstetric care at two levels may not be as effective as was once thought. The Dutch obstetric system itself possibly contributes to the high perinatal mortality compared with most European countries. We found that delivery-related perinatal death was significantly higher among low risk pregnancies in midwife supervised primary care than among high risk pregnancies in obstetrician supervised secondary care.

    The Dutch system relies on a risk assessment. Women are either in primary care or secondary care. Women who are in primary care have midwifery care and they have the option of home birth or hospital birth. The Netherlands currently has a 22% homebirth rate. Women with risk-associated pregnancies have obstetric (secondary) care and give birth in hospital. They might have issues such as high blood pressure, diabetes, twins, a previous caesarean and so on. Overall, 49.5% women remain in primary care at the start oaf labour, and 35% women remain in primary care throughout labour and birth. 65% women either start their pregnancy in secondary care or are transferred to secondary care at some stage in their pregnancy or labour. It is a system that has worked well for many years.

    However, the study has found that the intrapartum (labour and birth) death rate among term babies without congenital malformations (birth defects) was as follows:

  • For babies who started labour in primary (midwifery) care: 0.96/1000
  • For babies who started labour in secondary (obstetric) care: 0.24/1000
  • For births that took place in primary care: 0.91/1000
  • For births that took place in secondary care: 0.45/1000
  • For births that were referred from primary care to secondary care in labour: 1.09/1000
  • Babies of women who were referred from a midwife to an obstetrician during labour had a 3.66 times higher risk of delivery-related perinatal death than did infants of women who started labour supervised by an obstetrician.

    The study concludes that:

    The obstetric care system in the Netherlands may contribute to the high perinatal mortality

    and:

    the Dutch system of risk selection in relation to perinatal death at term is not as effective as was once thought.

    I suggest that there is another major issue involved that has been ignored in the above suggestion. In the Netherlands, midwives book 105 women per year. You read that correctly. While in Australia, midwives care for around 20-40 women per year, in the Netherlands it’s a huge caseload of 105 women per year. Therefore it is impossible for the midwife to personally attend every labour for the duration. Instead, there is a system in place where the women are cared for by a Kraamverzorgenden who stays with the woman during labour and for the first week after the baby is born. This person does not perform any midwifery care but provides support to the woman. The midwife pops in and out every two or four hours to examine the woman and perhaps listen to the baby’s heart beat – I say “perhaps” because there is no official guideline in The Netherlands that this ought to be attended at any specified interval. Hence the midwives check the baby’s heart beat as and when they choose. Acknowledging that the midwife does not sit with each women in labour, it’s plausible that the baby’s heart beat would only be checked every two or four hours. The standard of care for the UK and Australia is that the baby’s heart beat should be checked every 15 minutes in labour and after every contraction in the second stage of labour when the baby is being born. This is identified in the article:

    Of major concern is the fact that the highest mortality was among the infants of women who were referred from primary care to secondary care during labour because of an apparent complication. Hypothetically, this high mortality could have several causes … diagnosis in primary care can be delayed because the midwife is not always present during the first stage of labour and fetal heart beats are often checked only every two to four hours.

    I am interested in why this fundamental issue has not been addressed; rather, a complete review of a system that is in place in other countries – successfully – has been called for?

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Expectant mothers need facts, not fear

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Here we go again. A debate about home vs hospital birth.

    There is only one thing … that’s more emotive than where you give birth to a baby, and that is how you feed it.

    This week, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists … proposed that more women give birth away from doctors and hospitals. I really want to see how this works, because if there’s anyone more scared of home births than the parents, it’s doctors and midwives. (Note: not all, I know.)

    I’m not a doctor, nor a midwife. I have slightly more experience of pregnancy and birth than some, by virtue of being co-founder of a parenting website for the past seven years and working as a lay rep in a large maternity hospital for four. But really, my opinion, just like so many birthing women, counts for little.

    Look at what this report says: “The model we are proposing focuses on the needs of the woman and her baby by providing the right care, at the right time, in the right place, provided by the right person and which enhances the woman’s experience.” Sound great, doesn’t it? But who will decide what the right care, at the right time, etc, is? Who listens to what a mother … wants?

    Hospitals are so tied by NHS policy and guidelines, and are so scared of being sued that midwives who once were perfectly capable of delivering breech babies, big babies or twins at home (yes, it can be done) no longer can, or do. So it’s easier to book everyone into the hospital. What will change? How will it change? There aren’t enough midwives as it is.

    When I decided to try for a home birth I had to take myself out of the NHS system (an option that may no longer exist soon because of the threat to our independent midwives, but that is another story, for another time) because the idea so terrified almost everyone I met. I was simply deemed too high-risk. But this wasn’t based on any analysis of my actual, individual risks. It was because I ticked two boxes: “over 40″ (this is still being cited as a reason not to have a home birth) and “previous C-section” (ditto). One of the paediatricians at the hospital where I was a lay rep told me I was being irresponsible, that my scar would tear (the risk of uterine rupture is, in fact, very small) and that I’d kill myself and my baby.

    “Don’t expect us to attend to you” were her actual words. Amazingly, because I wasn’t on a dual suicide/infanticide mission, and I didn’t want to leave my firstborn motherless, I asked two separate, senior midwives to go through my previous notes with a fine-tooth comb. Conclusion: no reason at all not to try for a home birth if you want to …

    For many … the thought of giving birth at home is terrifying. I toyed with the idea of a home birth with my first for about 10 minutes. It was only when I saw firsthand what hospitals could offer and after five years of researching birth that I was brave enough even to think about it for my second baby.

    I’ll cut to the chase. I had my home birth without drugs or incident. Yes, it was fantastic. No, you shouldn’t have to have a home birth if you don’t want to, no more than I should have had to go to hospital if I didn’t want to. This brings me on to something that no report can ever address, and that’s the baggage we all – health professionals included – bring into maternity services: our own experiences. They should inform, but not dictate.

    There is one bit of the report that I think is underplayed: … “Women themselves need the support and encouragement of society, including the professionals, to take responsibility for their own health”. Indeed, we all need to take responsibility for how babies are born. Women need to stop dramatising labour, especially to their daughters. (Maternal influence is huge on a daughter’s subsequent expectation of her own labour.) Health professionals need to stop lecturing a woman on how to give birth and start listening to what women want – and then provide consistent, accurate, non-emotive information to help her set the agenda.

    We all need to stop projecting our own experiences and think that’s how it will/should be for everyone else. Only then can we hope to reverse this collective hysteria that surrounds giving birth. People who make TV programmes and films: I have a special message for you, because how you portray birth is so hugely influential. I know it makes for better TV to have a woman on her back, in a hospital, screaming and tearing off her husband’s earlobes, but please, counterbalance this with women also giving birth quietly, in a position other than prone and sometimes at home. It’s partly because of you that it took me nearly 40 years to realise that it could be done.

    Home birth has pros and cons

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    The number of at-home births is small but growing as pregnant women weigh the idea of a drug-free and surgery-free birth in a familiar setting versus the risk of harm to the baby in case of complications.

    When most pregnant women go into labor, they pack their bags for the hospital. When Lara Carlos felt the contractions in November 2008, she set up a birthing tub in her bedroom.

    For the next several hours, Carlos alternated between padding around her home and squatting and pushing in the tub. Her midwife poured water down her back and dabbed her forehead with cold towels. When the baby (they chose the name Vincent) arrived at 1:21 a.m., he spent his first few hours cuddling with his parents in their bed.

    Carlos … is one of a small but growing number of women who are choosing to deliver their babies at home. Her first son, Ivan, had been delivered in a hospital, and she says she found labor at home a dramatic improvement.

    “In the hospital, there were seven medical students in the room when I was pushing my son out,” she said. “At home, it was a very quiet, slow experience, and the water helped me to relax.”

    Though home births account for only about 1% of all births each year … they increased by 20% from 2004 to 2008 … The practice is most popular among well-educated mothers who favor natural childbirth without the drugs or surgeries a hospital might use.

    … The increase has reenergized the fierce debate over the safety of at-home delivery. The practice is officially frowned on by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists … because the absence of emergency medical equipment and specialists accustomed to dealing with complications means that problems during labor could cost the baby’s life.

    “All the existing scientific evidence, as well as state and national statistics, make it ultra-clear that home birth increases the risk of death,” …

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists does acknowledge that home births are associated with fewer medical interventions than hospital births … 61% of women who had vaginal delivery received an epidural in 2008, the year the report studied. And a 2006 national survey of women’s childbearing experiences showed that 55% were given Pitocin to speed labor.

    “There’s no doubt that once you end up in a hospital, you end up with more interventions — that’s what drives some families away,” … home birth is reasonable as long as women have few risk factors …, have an emergency backup plan and understand the risks involved.

    Women also turn to home birth in order to avoid caesarean sections, which have become more common as obstetricians became increasingly reluctant to take chances at the slightest sign of fetal distress …

    What’s more, many hospitals do not allow women who have previously had a caesarean to attempt a vaginal birth because of the risk of uterine rupture, even though a 2010 National Institutes of Health advisory panel concluded that the risk of uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one caesarean was just 1% and that more women should be offered the choice. Women wishing to have a VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean) may have no option but to do so on their own turf.

    Sarah … had two caesareans but chose a home birth for her third pregnancy, successfully delivering a baby girl in January 2010.

    “We had visited numerous hospitals, and the first time I mentioned a VBAC, I was just shut down completely,” Bolson says. Doctors refused to consider it because of the chance of rupture, she recalls, and one said he couldn’t risk having his medical malpractice insurance skyrocket.

    She eventually found a certified professional midwife who was willing to help her deliver at home, with a backup plan of transfer to a nearby hospital. Though initially worried about complications, “after I was able to release the fear, I was free to birth without any inhibition.”

    Many home-birth moms also say they object to other aspects of hospital births, such as having to lie in a bed, abstain from food during labor and be monitored by an army of nurses.

    “I believe in the intuitive power of the human body,” said Mayim Bialik, an actress and natural-birth advocate who has given birth at home. “I believe in having as much privacy as possible, in being able to move freely, to eat when I want, drink when I want, and to be surrounded by the sounds and smells of what is familiar to me.”

    “Other mammals go off on their own to labor,” adds Dr. Stuart Fischbein, a Los Angeles-based obstetrician who has been delivering exclusively in homes since 2010. “When a patient goes to a hospital, she gets told to lay flat on her back strapped down with monitors with constant interruptions from hospital personnel — does that sound conducive to having a normal labor?”

    Arrangements for a home birth go something like this: Early in the pregnancy a woman finds either a … midwife … The midwife provides some or all of the woman’s prenatal care and is on call as the woman approaches her due date …

    During labor, many women use water tubs because they find the water soothing and pain-relieving; others choose to just move about their homes as they see fit. The midwife monitors the fetus’ heart tones with a Doppler device, and most also bring equipment such as oxygen tanks, anti-hemmorhagic medication, local anesthetic and suturing supplies in case of tearing or bleeding. If an emergency arises that the midwife can’t manage, home-birth moms are advised to transfer immediately to a hospital.

    The core of the home-birth debate lies with the safety of the baby — and here, opinions and the data are sharply divided. A 2005 study of 5,418 births in the U.S. and Canada during 2000 … found that the neonatal death rates of at-home births were comparable to those of births in hospitals.

    But a July 2010 analysis published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology examined the outcomes of 12 home-and-hospital-birth studies and found that babies born at home die at two to three times the rate of those born in hospitals …

    … the distance to the nearest emergency room can sometimes mean the difference between life and death. “Saying, ‘trust birth’ is like saying ‘trust the weather,’” she says, referring to a slogan occasionally used in natural-birth groups.

    Just as vocal online communities have sprung up to promote home birth, so too have others populated by women whose home-birth attempts turned into tragedies … Liz Paparella’s fourth child was stillborn on her living room couch because her midwife failed to take Paparella to the hospital when she began bleeding during labor.

    “I never thought it was more dangerous to have a baby at home than at the hospital,” says Paparella, who had given birth successfully at home two times previously. “In birth, the risk can change from low to high in a matter of minutes.”

    … A clear answer to the safety question is hard to find because nearly every home-birth study has some flaw that is flagged by one side of the debate or the other as invalidating the results. Given this uncertainty, Ouzounian cautions women to research, prepare and choose wisely.

    Home births, he says, should be considered only by those who have a well-trained midwife and are experiencing no complications with their pregnancy …

    “Under the right circumstances, with the right patient selection and with a … midwife attending, the overall maternal complication rates with home births are comparable” to those of a hospital birth …

    But he also advises women not to think about birth in black-or-white terms: There are many ways to make delivery more “natural” even if it takes place in the hospital …

    Fischbein says that doctors could be more accommodating to their patients by providing them with information about all of their birth options — at home and in the hospital — and stand ready to serve as backups for those who wish to labor at home with a midwife.

    “There’s room in this world for low-risk home birthing and for hospital birthing,” he says. “We really should support each individual woman’s right to choose how to deliver her baby.”

    Re-thinking Maternity Care Systems

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    … fewer than 30 per cent of women approaching their first birth attend prenatal classes, and books and the Internet are their primary sources for information about birth.

    Women attending obstetricians were more favourable to the use of birth technology and were less appreciative of women’s roles in their own delivery. In contrast, women attending midwives reported less favourable views toward the use of technology and were more supportive of the importance of women’s roles …

    Even late in pregnancy, questions about epidural analgesia, Caesarean section and episiotomy solicited the most “I don’t know” responses from women who took the survey. But women attending midwives appeared more knowledgeable on these issues.

    “Our findings suggest that obstetricians, midwives and family physicians are caring for different populations of women, with different attitudes and expectations towards childbirth,” … “But regardless of the type of care providers they attended … many women reported uncertainty about benefits and risks of common procedures used at childbirth. This is worrisome because a lack of knowledge affects their ability to engage in informed discussions with their caregivers.”

    A second study, published last month in the journal Birth, compared the attitudes toward birth technology and women’s role in their childbirth between the younger generation of obstetricians and their predecessors.

    Klein and colleagues surveyed 800 Canadian obstetricians who include birth delivery in their practice. Out of 549 respondents, 81 per cent of those 40 years or younger were women (vs. 40 per cent over 40 years of age) …

    … younger obstetricians were significantly more likely to favour the use of routine epidural analgesia and were more concerned about the perceived adverse effects of vaginal birth …

    … the younger generation sees Cesarean section as a solution to many labour and birth problems, and incorrectly sees C-section as safer for both mothers and babies … younger obstetricians are more likely to choose C-section for themselves or their partners, and are less likely to believe women missed out on an important experience by having a C-section.

    … “This study shows it’s generation, not gender, that affects obstetricians’ views about procedures like C-sections,” … “this could present a challenge to efforts to decrease C-section rates in both U.S. and Canada.” As well … up to a third of obstetricians were not evidence-based in their views. This creates concern about informed decision-making, especially for women who are uncertain about procedures that might be used in birth.

    … 75 per cent [of obstetricians] thought home birth was more dangerous than hospital birth … even though home birth by regulated midwives has been shown to be safe in Canada.

    … “These three studies taken together show us that educational leaders and provincial policy-makers need to seriously examine the educational models and experiences that appear to teach the non-evidence-based view that vaginal childbirth is primarily a dangerous activity,” … ” … we need more midwives … while obstetricians in training will need to have more experience with normal birth, and in the future, restrict their role to that of consultants to midwives … In this way they can maximize the appropriateness of their surgical training.

    “This means rethinking the design of the entire Canadian maternity care system. Finally, if women are to be empowered with the information that they need to dialogue with their providers, new forms of accurate information transfer will need to be developed.”

    C-section not best option for breech birth

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Physicians should no longer automatically opt to perform a cesarean section in the case of a breech birth, according to new guidelines by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada.

    Released yesterday, the guidelines are a response to new evidence that shows many women are safely able to vaginally deliver babies who enter the birth canal with the buttocks or feet first …

    … Since 2000, C-sections have been the preferred method of delivery in breech births. Studies suggested that breached births were associated with an increased rate of complication when performed vaginally.

    As a result, many medical schools have stopped training their physicians in breech vaginal delivery.

    The problem now, according to Dr. Lalonde, is that there is a serious shortage of doctors to teach and perform these deliveries.

    With the release of the new guidelines, the SOGC will launch a nationwide training program to ensure that doctors will be adequately prepared to offer vaginal breech births .

    The new approach was prompted by a reassessment of earlier trials. It now appears that there is no difference in complication rates between vaginal and cesarean section deliveries in the case of breech births.

    … Ms. Guy started the group after the birth of her second child in the fall of 2006. Although she had given birth to her first child at home with a midwife, Ms. Guy delivered her daughter in the hospital because of the baby’s breech position.

    “I was cornered into an unneeded and unwanted C-section because the obstetrician that I had didn’t have the experience to catch her,” said Ms. Guy.

    The aim of the coalition is to ensure that women know what their options are when it comes to breech birth. Ms. Guy believes that many women don’t realize that vaginal breech births are even possible.

    … The new decision to offer vaginal breech birth aligns with the SOGC promotion of normal childbirth – spontaneous labour, followed by a delivery that is not assisted by forceps, vacuum or cesarean section. In December of 2008, the society release a policy statement that included its recommendation for a development of national practice guidelines on normal childbirth.

    “The safest way to deliver has always been the natural way,” …

    … The SOGC believes that if a woman is well-prepared during pregnancy, she has the innate ability to deliver vaginally …

    In NSW, we have the Towards Normal Birth Policy which also promotes normal birth, waterbirth, vaginal breech birth, vaginal twin birth and VBACs. The policy directive recommends one-to-one midwifery care for all women having their first baby, twins, breech or VBAC. It’s a very encouraging policy.

    QLD: Mums-to-be pushed into caesareans with private hospitals leading the way

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    SOME of the state’s biggest private hospitals are performing caesareans on more than half the women giving birth …

    The caesarean rates among the highest in the country were uncovered in hospital birth statistics from 2007-2010 obtained by The Sunday Mail under Right to Information laws.

    Queensland’s “caesars palace” was the North West Brisbane Private Hospital, which performed the surgery on 56.8 per cent of women giving birth. Toowoomba’s St Vincent’s Hospital and The Wesley Hospital in Brisbane rounded out the Top 3, with rates of 54.8 per cent and 51.8 per cent respectively.

    The latest figures … will reignite the turf war between midwives, who espouse natural birth, and obstetricians who defend surgical intervention.

    Caesarean births are recommended as safer options for women having large babies, twins or breech births, as well as older mums and women who have had previous caesareans.

    Latest recommendations from Canada suggest that vaginal birth is safest for most breech babies. NSW Health promotes vaginal birth for twins and of course we know that vaginal birth after a caesarean is safer than elective repeat caesarean provided that the birth takes place in a facility that has resources available to perform an emergency caesarean if needed. And “big” babies? This cannot be known with any accuracy ahead of time and the current recommendation is for a planned vaginal birth.

    But some critics say growing numbers of medical professionals are convincing mothers to undergo caesareans just to streamline private maternity ward schedules and maximise revenue.

    Across the state the figures add weight to the theory, with caesareans accounting for 27.6 per cent of births in public hospitals and a huge 48.3 per cent in private hospitals.

    We know that this difference is not comprised of women requesting caesareans: only 2-3% women actually request a caesarean. Most are told they “need” a caesarean because their baby is “big” (3.3Kg), “late” at 39 weeks and 6 days, a previous caesarean, breech, twins, IVF, mum is “overweight”, mildly elevated blood pressure (130/80) and so on. I have heard all of these and more, as “valid” reasons for caesarean.

    Several new mothers approached by The Sunday Mail last week said they had been pushed into having caesareans by private hospital obstetricians after initially wanting to give birth naturally.

    One Coolum mum, 45, said her obstetrician told her she had “no choice” because the baby would “not fit through my birthing canal”.

    This can not be known ahead of time. The only way to find out is to labour and see how it goes. Dedicated, exclusive, one-to-one midwifery care in labour from a midwife who is know to the woman by name and trusted by the woman, is the most important factor in ensuring a normal birth.

    … “I just wanted a natural birth, to me that was important …

    I think personal responsibility also plays a part here. If a woman genuinely wants a natural birth, she needs to consider which care provider will maximise her chances of achieving this. Consumers of any service are wise to research options thoroughly before they go ahead with them. We do more research about buying a car, house or holiday than we do when choosing our care providers. Having chosen an ill-suited care provider, it is never too late to change.

    Another mum … desperate to avoid a caesarean, said her obstetrician also tried to book an induction because she had passed her due date in the Christmas-New Year period.

    “The obstetrician said we can book you in for an induction because we just don’t like calling people in on public holidays,” …

    But doctors point the finger at today’s “too posh to push” mothers, who they say demand caesars, as well as older mothers who have an added risk with vaginal births.

    Australian College of Midwives spokeswoman Professor Jenny Gamble said the health system was driven by profit.

    “It’s all about less night disturbance and more throughput; it all comes down to money,” she said. “It’s a fee-for-service model the more women obstetricians see, the more they earn.”

    Australian Medical Association Queensland president Dr Gino Pecoraro rejected as “urban myth” claims that obstetricians earned more for caesarean births.

    Private Hospitals Association Queensland said birthing decisions were not made by the hospital.

    This is true: hospitals do not make any decisions about birth: those decisions are made by the doctor and patient. As we have read in this article, many of the decisions are “guided” by the doctor. The other factor in these escalating caesarean rates is litigation. When caesarean rates increase and doctors are reluctant to attend VBACs, the caesarean rate will automatically increase.

    Not all doctors have high caesarean rates and some are very supportive of normal birth BUT … if a woman genuinely wants a normal birth, the best advice is to go a normal birth specialist.

    Ina May Gaskin: Are We Having Babies All Wrong?

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Ina May Gaskin started delivering babies in 1970 while on a hippie cross-country trip known as the caravan. She had no medical training, just a … gut feeling that women deserved kinder, gentler births. When the hundreds of caravaners settled in Tennessee on what they called the Farm, Gaskin and several other women began delivering the community’s babies at home … Word got around when Gaskin wrote about her successes in Spiritual Midwifery, and a movement was born.

    Today, women still travel far and wide to give birth on the Farm, and Gaskin’s methods have the respect of clinicians around the world …

    You started attending births with no formal medical training. How did you know you could do it?
    I knew how to deal with potential complications because kind doctors helped me. But basically I was behaving the way my aunt, who had a farm, would around any laboring mammal. You don’t disturb her, you don’t upset her. She deserves peace and quiet and respect. Doing that meant that no C-sections were necessary for the first 200 births on the Farm.

    The C-section rate on the Farm is very low, under 2% for about 3,000 births, while the average in the U.S. for low-risk women is 20%. Can you explain?
    It’s very rare to see an undisturbed birth in a modern U.S. teaching hospital, but when you see a woman who isn’t frightened, who’s giving birth without interference, you stand back in awe and realize how little needed you are except in the rare circumstance. That doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t be around in case there is a problem. It just means that you should be able to tell when there’s a problem, and you should be able to tell how not to create problems.

    Why the title Birth Matters? Who are you trying to convince?
    Lately, I’ve been thinking we really need to get men interested in birth … fathers-to-be have a very strong protective instinct … Men instantly understand what I call “sphincter law.” You don’t try to defecate while lying flat on your back tied to various machines with somebody shouting at you! Why do we, then, continue to treat women as if their emotions and comfort, and the postures they might want to assume while in labor, are against the rules?

    … If birth matters, midwives matter. In Europe, there are hospitals where the cesarean rate is less than 10%, and you’ll find midwives in these hospitals …

    Do you talk this frankly to obstetricians when you give grand rounds at major hospitals? Do they take offense?
    A lot of OBs aren’t happy about the high cesarean rate either. Malpractice-insurance companies have become the boss of obstetricians. It used to be that OBs were taught skills to deliver twins and breech babies vaginally. Now all they can really offer is surgery … When I go into hospitals, I talk about how we do things on the Farm. I love talking to OBs. We midwives and physicians have a lot to teach each other.

    Midwives Deliver Change

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Midwives are urging all political parties to support the development of birth centres in Ontario …

    “Birth centres provide a safe, supportive environment where women can access prenatal, labour, birth and post-partum care,” said Katrina Kilroy, RM, president of the AOM. “We believe they can improve maternal-newborn care while cutting health care costs.”

    Birth centres are well established in the US, UK, Australia and Quebec. Ontario midwives currently attend births in both home and hospital, but there is increasing demand from women and families for another out-of-hospital birth option. Birth centres help divert healthy women and newborns from hospital, which in turn lowers costly intervention rates such as c-sections. They provide for community-based care in a family-oriented environment.

    … There are over 500 Registered Midwives in Ontario, serving communities in 85 clinics across the province. Midwives have privileges at most Ontario hospitals. They have been provincially funded and regulated since 1994.

    A midwife is a registered health care professional who provides primary care to women with low-risk pregnancies. Midwives provide care throughout pregnancy, labour and birth and provide care to both mother and baby during the first six weeks following the birth. The Association of Ontario Midwives is the professional organization representing midwives and the profession of midwifery in Ontario …

    Labouring over options for pain relief

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Ma.Fe Jackson didn’t want to miss any part of the birthing experience, so she refused to have an epidural …

    “Childbirth is very, very painful, but that’s normal and it’s only for a short time,” says the new mom who gave birth in February to first baby, Angelique.

    Jackson is Filipino and most Filipinos don’t have epidurals, she explains. Besides, she’s scared of needles, which is how an epidural is administered.

    Pain may be a normal part of childbirth, but most North American women today don’t experience it.

    In Edmonton in 2009, 57 per cent of the 11,782 women who gave birth in hospital asked for an epidural … The majority of those who didn’t have an epidural had some other form of pain relief …

    Thirty years ago only two to four per cent of women had epidurals.

    “We only used them for longer, more complicated labours,” … “There was a general desire to have a natural childbirth because there was a feeling that birth had become medicalized.

    “Now, I would say the majority of women are coming in and they’ve already decided that they will have an epidural as soon as they get into labour. It’s really swung the other way.”

    Even women who plan to have an epidural only as a last resort, usually end up having one …

    Dr. Michael Klein, a family physician, pediatrician and neonatologist from Vancouver, thinks the trend reflects the lack of knowledge that women having babies, especially first babies, have about labour and delivery.

    His maternity research … shows one-third to one-half … aren’t fully informed about childbirth, including the effects of an epidural.

    That may have something to do with the fact that only one-third of first-time moms-to-be sign up for prenatal classes. The majority get their information, or misinformation, as Klein calls it, from highly questionable Internet websites.

    A similar survey of 5,000 health providers who care for these women, found they too were similarly lacking in information, says Klein, professor emeritus of family practice and pediatrics at the University of British Columbia, and senior scientist emeritus at the Child and Family Research Institute in Vancouver.

    Although the epidural is considered safe, there are risks …

    “ … epidural headache, and in very rare cases you could have a significant neurological problem because of it,” …

    “ … it will lengthen the first and second stages of your labour significantly, that you’re more likely to have an epidural fever, and that it increases the likelihood of forceps or vacuum … You’re more likely to have an episiotomy or perineal trauma, and the issue of caesarean sections tend to be avoided altogether because doctors actually believe that even an early epidural will not cause a problem.”

    … in general, younger obstetricians (under age 40), were more supportive of the role of birth technology in normal birth, including routine epidural analgesia, than physicians over 40, and they were less appreciative of the role of women in their own birth. They also saw caesarean section as a solution to many perceived labour and birth problems.

    “ … I think women really need to know the full picture,” he adds. If they were fully informed he believes fewer women would ask for an epidural.

    Klein is best known for his research that found routine episiotomies caused the very problems they’re supposed to prevent …

    … Klein acknowledges that birth is painful, but argues many women would be able to handle it without drugs if they had support.

    “There is a difference between pain and suffering, and no one is in favour of suffering,” Klein says. “You suffer when you are abandoned, when people aren’t there to help you with your pain.

    “Nobody is going to deny there is pain in labour nor that it is significant, but if you are cared for by somebody who understands the pain and tells you only have a contraction or two as intense as this until you’re fully dilated and you’ll be much more in control of the pain, if you had that kind of information, you might decide to hold off (having pain relief).”

    … “Midwifery intervention has positive outcomes that no other intervention that we have to offer in medicine can even touch. If we all practised that way we wouldn’t be having this discussion,” …

    Childbirth: More Labor Interventions, Same Outcomes

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Hospitals vary considerably in the frequency with which they induce labor and perform Caesarean sections. But a new study finds that these differences do not seem to affect how newborns fare in these facilities.

    Dr. J. Christopher Glantz, a professor of obstetrics at the University of Rochester, reviewed records of almost 30,000 births … Some hospitals relied heavily on induced labor and Caesarean sections, while others performed the procedures much less often.

    Dr. Glantz measured neonatal outcomes in three ways: whether a child was moved to an intensive care hospital, whether a child needed immediate assisted ventilation and whether a child received a low Apgar score.

    He found no difference in outcomes for babies born in the hospitals with the highest rates of these procedures and those with the lowest. The result suggests that routine reliance on the procedures does little to improve outcomes …

    The recipe for safe, empowering, minimal-intervention birthing is:
    A woman who is positively motivated to have a natural birth
    Who is well-prepared for pregnancy, labour, birth and parenthood
    Who is supported by one midwife and one obstetrician right the way through her pregnancy, birth and postnatal experience
    Care providers who collaborate, communicate, respect and trust one another, who work for the best interests of the woman and her baby

    Pioneering Collaborative Private Maternity Care: Continuity, woman-centered, personalised, safe.

    Our brand new model of care – launched for the first time in Australia – has recently welcomed its third baby. So far, three families have benefited from a collaborative model of private maternity care that enables women to have care with a private midwife (with Medicare funding) and also develop a trusting and nurturing relationship with a Specialist Obstetrician who is available for the pregnancy, labour and birth. Our service has so far supported an empowered birth after caesarean, a waterbirth and a natural birth. All within a hospital setting, with all the support available that is occasionally needed.

    We’ve received some really positive feedback:

    “The collaborative model seemed unique to me. To have a private midwife and our own birth experience but in a hospital with an obstetrician who was known to us as back-up in case of unexpected complications, allowed us to feel totally comfortable and confident for our first baby.”
    “I felt entirely supported and encouraged.”
    “A highly personalised level of care was offered which makes you feel listened to and allows time for lots of questions.”
    “I liked the fact that we got time to develop a relationship and feel comfortable together, allowing us a better birth experience. Postnatally, it was nice to have the same person continuing my care. It was highly personalised.”

    Our model sees women booking with me for their care. Women who are interested in having collaborative maternity care meet with the obstetrician early in their pregnancy and again between 32 and 36 weeks. Women see the obstetrician more often if additional visits with him are needed. Otherwise, I am in frequent communication with him and we work together to provide safe, evidence-based, woman-centered care to our pregnant women. This allows women to build a sense of connection, trust and continuity.

    We support natural birth, active birth, physiological birth positions, physiological third stage, water birth, VBAC, twin births, breech births … and so on. Women are really well prepared for natural birth with an emphasis on informed decision making and woman-centered care. Childbirth education is included, as well as access to a lending library of books and DVDs.

    Birth care is provided initially at home and then we move to hospital where I provide full midwifery care. The birth is attended by myself and the Obstetrician if needed / desired. It’s an intimate, calm, peaceful experience and facilitates a gentle and safe birth.

    After we have welcomed the baby and birthed the placenta, women generally stay in hospital for 4 – 24 hours before returning home. Of course, if there are any issues women are welcome to stay longer, but generally I find that women feel more comfortable in their own homes, in their own beds. I visit at home every day for a week and continue care for 6 weeks. Since women book into hospital as a private patient, they are almost assured a private room with an en-suite.

    I’m really excited about this model of care because it meets the needs of women so perfectly:

  • Women having their first babies, maybe feeling unsure of what to expect
  • Women who previously experienced dis-continuous care from care providers who were unknown to them
  • Women who are planning a natural birth but perhaps with a more challenging pregnancy
  • Women who want a home birth / birth centre birth but with a known obstetrician available if needed
  • Women who really desire a sense of control over their birthing experience
  • This is a new way of working for both midwives and obstetricians and is a really supportive and nurturing way to practice. There is a huge potential for professional growth and learning. The most positive element, however, is the radiant smiles on the faces of the women who have birthed with us and the babies who have received a safe and gentle start to life.

    C-section puts children at food risk

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Caesareans are the safest they have ever been, and for some women and some babies, they are life-saving and very necessary. However, we do have a current caesarean rate of over 30% and this is deemed to be too high; ie, the rate cannot be justified by medical need and at this level, may cause more harm than good. If a caesarean is genuinely necessary, the risks reported below of food allergies would be well justified by the benefit of having the caesarean.

    GIVING birth by caesarean section increases the risk of your child suffering from food allergies …

    Pediatric allergy specialist Dr Peter Smith is urging expectant mothers to consider a vaginal delivery because of growing evidence a c-section can “significantly increase the risk of your child suffering from an allergy to cow’s milk”.

    Admissions to hospital emergency departments for allergic reactions have increased by 500 per cent since 1990 in Australia.

    … the massive rise in food allergies [is] likely to be attributed to several causes rather than one.

    But symptomatic food allergy was found to occur more frequently in children born by c-section.

    “… studies have shown a difference in the composition of the gastrointestinal flora of children with food allergies compared to those without,”

    “When a child moves through the birth canal, they ingest bacteria and become naturally inoculated through a small mouthful of secretions.

    “The oral ingestion of those healthy bugs is the first bacteria that comes into their system.”

    Dr Smith said that first bacteria entering the body established “the population”.

    Not only does Australia have one of the highest prevalence of allergic disorders in the developed world, but recent studies have demonstrated a doubling in some conditions such as allergic rhinitis (hay fever), eczema and potentially dangerous anaphylaxis.

    … the next best thing to a “natural” birth was to follow birth with breast feeding.

    “Breast milk contains lots of healthy bugs … to promote the growth of healthy bacteria and assist your child’s immune system in the first few week’s of life,” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Can ‘hypnobirthing’ really take the pain out of having a baby?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Emma Shaw admits that she turned up for her first hypnobirthing class with a strong dose of scepticism.

    A down-to-earth and pragmatic TV producer, she fully expected to walk into a room ‘full of hippy, airy-fairies giving birth in yurts’.

    Like most mothers-to-be, the 30-year-old had been drip-fed horror stories from colleagues and friends of women screaming, swearing and assaulting their husbands, surrounded by beeping, blinking monitors.

    She was convinced that was ‘the only way’. Anything else was just a pipe dream, wasn’t it?

    The theory behind hypnobirthing holds that 95 per cent of labour pain is due to fear and tension, which could be eliminated through relaxation techniques

    … after researching alternative birth techniques for a documentary, Emma was introduced to the idea of using her mind to seize control of the birthing process through hypnosis.

    And when her son Leo was born 14 months ago, following a relatively pain and stress-free labour, Emma is convinced hypnobirthing is most certainly ‘the other way’.

    … This is exactly what the NHS is seeking to investigate in an 18-month study on the effectiveness of hypnobirthing being launched this week, which, it is hoped, will reduce the financial strain on tightening NHS budgets caused by costly drug treatments such as epidurals — and also make births easier and safer for women and babies.

    At present, 60 per cent of women opt for forms of pain relief which some professionals have blamed for everything from difficulties with breastfeeding to postnatal depression.

    … Women will be taught deep relaxation techniques which are said to induce an almost trance-like state, making women calmer and more able to block out pain.

    … Judith Flood, a 41-year-old midwife who trained as a hypnobirthing teacher eight years ago after noticing the difference it made to women’s experience of labour.

    … ‘I was working at St Thomas’ Hospital in London when a women walked in, a first-time mother in her late 30s, who was totally calm, smiley and chatty.

    ‘I nearly sent her away again, assuming labour couldn’t be established … ‘When we examined her she was almost fully dilated. Even as she gave birth, she was totally calm and able to talk, simply by practising her deep breathing techniques to manage the pain.’

    … From that point, Judith became fascinated with the practice, noticing in many cases it actually halved the duration of labour from an average 12 hours to four to six hours …

    ‘It teaches women how to become deeply relaxed, quickly and easily. It is a skill like any other that gets better with practice, so that as she goes into labour it is second nature. We also use association techniques, where a woman’s partner can use a simple touch as the trigger to relax …

    The Australian version of Hyponobirthing – taught by a midwife – is Calmbirth, which I highly recommend for all of my clients. Julie Clarke runs fantastic Calmbirth classes in Sylvania, as well as her famous Transition into Parenthood classes.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwife encourages natural births

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    GOLD Coast Midwifery Practice … is all for natural births.

    When it comes to having a baby … a vaginal birth was the best-designed system.

    ”A vaginal birth has many inherent safety mechanisms that protect both mother and baby,” …

    However, elective cesareans are becoming more common on the Gold Coast …

    ”We live in a very technocratic society where people like to have as much control as possible,”

    … ”It … raises the question of a lack of continuity of care in the health system.

    ”Care is fragmented and many women aren’t able to form a bond with a care giver. Therefore the process of having a baby can be frightening and they opt for the easy option of having an elective cesarean.” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Vaginal delivery connected to lower morbidity in twins

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Twins tend to do better if born vaginally, rather than by caesarean section … But regardless of delivery mode, the first-born twin is less likely to suffer complications than the second.

    … Neonatal morbidity was lower in the first than the second twin (3.0% versus 4.6%). This was also true of mortality (0.35% versus 0.6%).

    In either twin there were no differences between vertex and non-vertex and attempted vaginal delivery versus planned caesarean section.

    In the first twin, neonatal morbidity was lower after vaginal delivery than caesarean section (1.1% versus 2.1%).

    When the first twin underwent vaginal delivery and the co-twin underwent caesarean section (combined delivery), morbidity was significantly higher in the co-twin (19.8%) than in the case of vaginal delivery (9%) or caesarean delivery of both newborns (7.2%).

    “In the absence of more definitive data, our systematic review suggests that an attempt at vaginal delivery should be considered in twin pregnancies,” …

    “With regard to the second twin, no differences are noted between caesarean section and vaginal delivery …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Big mums risk babies’ health

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Pregnant women are packing on too many kilograms, risking their health and that of their babies – and costing the health system a fortune.

    A staggering 41.5 per cent of the 7735 women who gave birth at Auckland’s National Women’s Hospital in 2009 were classed as overweight or obese.

    Those with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 25 were considered overweight, while those who exceeded 30 were said to be obese.

    … national and international research showed it was a growing problem …

    … Big mums … were at increased risk of:

    * Developing diabetes and other serious pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia.

    * Having a stillbirth. There is a two-fold increase for obese mothers.

    * Needing a caesarean section.

    * Breast-feeding problems.

    * Having a big baby, which in turn is at risk of becoming an obese child.

    … Another concern was a trend in pregnant women, aged under 25, being obese.

    … obese mums also had a higher chance of having a baby with an abnormality …

    Nutrition and exercise are the foundations of a healthy pregnancy, healthy birth and healthy baby. In my service. I focus a lot on optimising women’s nutrition because it is a modifiable aspect of care that can really make a difference. For women choosing homebirths, I think it’s especially important to make really healthy food choices and to exercise most days of the week. I acknowledge that it’s really hard to change habits – especially exercise and nutrition habits – so I provide lots of support, guidance and motivational tools to help women work towards health.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Health chiefs encourage more home births over caesareans

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    HEALTH chiefs are aiming to slash the number of mothers giving birth by caesarean section and encourage more home births in Poole and Bournemouth.

    The area has the highest rates of births by caesarean section in the south west, including the worst emergency rates – two per cent higher than the next primary care trust.

    In Bournemouth and Poole, 11 per cent of mothers choose to have their babies by C-section, compared to eight per cent in the three best performing primary care trusts in the region, and seven per cent in Southampton.

    NHS Bournemouth and Poole is working with maternity services to try and normalise the local pattern of births.

    A spokeswoman explained: “We are concerned with the increase in planned and unplanned caesarean section rates because these procedures can present more risk to mother and baby.

    “Women who have had a normal birth can return home more quickly to their family and their recovery is quicker.

    “With appropriate care and support the majority of healthy women can give birth with a minimum of medical procedures and most women prefer to avoid interventions, provided their baby is safe and they feel supported.”

    A spokeswoman for Poole Hospital’s maternity unit, the centre for high risk births in East Dorset, said: “The majority of caesarean sections are undertaken only where there is a clear clinical reason to do so – for example, if babies become distressed during labour, or for the safe delivery of breech babies or twins.

    “However, we are working closely with NHS Bournemouth and Poole to reduce the number we carry out.”

    The trust plans to recruit more midwives and use experienced obstetricians to increase the number of breech babies born normally.

    Extra ante-natal clinics will be introduced to help women have a normal birth after previously having a caesarean, and the hospital will stop providing caesarean sections by choice instead of medical need.”

    The hospital already has birthing pools and has just launched an on-call service to support women who choose home births.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Women choosing midwives

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    When Lisa Unger was pregnant … she saw a gynecologist for medical care. Then she made the switch.

    … “I decided I wanted a midwife, I was pregnant, it was not an illness, I didn’t need a doctor. I was going with a midwife who could empower and coach me through the natural function of my body. I wanted to do it in the hospital, I wasn’t comfortable with a home birth … ”

    … “The term ‘midwife’ means ‘being with women’. We support them, empower them. We tell them how wonderful they’re doing. ”

    The midwife and mom-to-be establish a bond, since midwives are able to spend more time connecting with their patients over time …
    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Unnecessary C-Sections on the Rise

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Australia’s caesarean rate was 31.1% in 2008.

    Link

    Five years ago, Jill Arnold got some unwanted news at her obstetrician’s office. At 37 weeks pregnant, Arnold was told her baby was too big for her body to deliver naturally. Flipping open a calendar, the obstetrician asked when Arnold would like to schedule a cesarean section.

    Fact: You cannot know that a baby is “too big” until you give labour a go.

    Unconvinced she needed the surgery — the doctor “couldn’t provide any statistics or data” her baby was too large — Arnold delivered her 10-pound, 3-ounce (4.6 kilogram) baby the old-fashioned way. Since then, the now 36-year old … delivered another baby weighing 11 pounds, and now pens a blog called The Unnecesarean.

    Women like Arnold, however, are becoming increasingly rare. Between 1996 and 2007, the number of C-sections performed in U.S. hospitals rose by more than 50 percent to an all-time high: Almost one in three pregnant women …

    “The most concerning problem is the high rate in first-time mothers,” …

    … The shift is toward a more streamlined labor and delivery, and profoundly affects mothers-to-be.

    … this shift is not likely to reverse any time soon.

    In 2009, 26-year old Ann Carter … labored for 14 hours. With her cervix dilated to only 6 centimeters … her doctor told her it was time for a C-section.

    “I was devastated and scared,” Carter said, “I knew it was a possibility but I was hoping it wouldn’t happen.”

    During the surgery, the doctor discovered the umbilical cord had wrapped around the baby’s neck, which explained why Carter’s labor had stalled. The C-section saved the baby boy’s life.

    Um, actually, it is very common for the cord to be around the baby’s neck, and it rarely causes concerns.

    “Most times the decision to perform a C-section is based on the physician’s judgment,” Zhang said, “but there are great variations in decision-making among physicians.”

    … there are “few clear-cut indications” of when to do one.

    … For example, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) lists “failure to progress” during labor, as an indication that cesarean delivery is needed … When things slow down, there is an element of judgment involved where a physician determines whether to continue to wait, induce or perform a C-section … it can take hours to determine whether or not labor is progressing.

    In Zhang’s study, however, he found that many patients weren’t given a sufficiently long time period to allow their labor to progress. In other words, doctors were calling it quits on waiting and opting for a C-section too soon — often before the patient’s cervix was dilated to 6 centimeters.

    This was especially true in cases of induced labor … Almost half of the C-sections in these women occurred before they were 6 centimeters dilated …

    Still, it is not clear whether inducing labor raises the risk of C-section, or whether other factors are involved that contribute to why women were induced in the first place …

    … Another factor contributing to the record-high cesarean rates is a drastic decline in vaginal births after cesarean … 70 percent of women in his study who had previously undergone a cesarean delivery had C-sections with their subsequent pregnancies, without attempting vaginal delivery.

    One reason for this is a fear of lawsuits. If a physician doesn’t perform a C-section, and something goes wrong with a patient who previously had a C-section, the law often does not protect the physician …

    … the number of malpractice claims involving obstetric and gynecologic surgery are the second highest of all medical specialties. In 2009, the claims totaled over $133 million.

    Fears of legal action also explain why at least 30 percent of all U.S. hospitals have official bans prohibiting VBACs …

    The risks associated with a vaginal birth following a C-section have been somewhat exaggerated, however, Zhang said.

    “Women and physicians may be concerned about uterine rupture, but the risk is less than 1 percent,” …

    To help reduce rising cesarean rates, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced less restrictive guidelines in July, stating that vaginal birth “has fewer complications than a repeat cesarean….restrictive VBAC policies should not be used to force women to undergo a repeat cesarean delivery against her will.” …

    … some medical experts have suggested the rapid rise of C-sections in the last decade is also due in small part to mothers-to-be requesting them, not doctors. Still, data on “patient choice cesareans” is lacking, as statistics used as support of their frequency are often based on ambiguous procedural codes used on hospital discharge records.

    In any case, women who opt for a C-section may not be getting adequate information about risks, and may fear they have no other option …

    … To curb the rise, many advocate giving women more autonomy over their labor and delivery, and combining the strengths of modern medicine with the principles and practices of midwifery.

    La Follette’s California office is an example of this more comprehensive approach: After participating in a larger practice for 12 years, she now works with two experienced midwives and another physician. Her practice has a successful VBAC rate of 75 percent.

    “We take into account the expectations and ideas of the mom and balance that with medical guidance,” La Follette said.

    As more women consider practices with midwives and home births — which can be dangerous if complications arise — much of the medical establishment has been digging in its heels. In 2008, the American Medical Association’s House of Delegates proposed a resolution to declare hospitals the only safe place for labor, and only midwives who work under the supervision of physicians as safe.

    The Midwives Alliance of North America declared the resolution “seriously out-of-step with the ethical concept of patient autonomy in healthcare [that] distracts from other critical issues in maternity care.”

    If there is any chance of lowering the rates of C-sections, professional organizations will need to review all the available evidence, Zhang said.

    But any change won’t be easy. On the one hand, doctors need to include expectant moms in their own care; on the other, it sometimes seems that doctors who are worried about potential legal consequences can’t focus on a patient’s best interests.

    “We’re fighting a cultural issue,” Scott said, that extends beyond C-sections.

    She said, “We need to change the entire way we view birth and we have to be able to trust our caregivers. The alternative would be terrifying.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Your body, your choice

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The transforming experience of childbirth is increasingly blotted by medical interventions. Are women making informed decisions?

    LIKE most first-time mothers, Faye Wong … was incredibly excited when she got pregnant. She read baby books and magazines voraciously, signed up for ante-natal class … to prepare for baby’s arrival.

    When she was 38 weeks pregnant, her obstetrician said the baby’s head had engaged and his size was quite big. The doctor suggested inducing her labour.

    In the labour room, her “nightmare” began. The pain from the drug-induced contractions was a rude jolt to her system. Then she was jabbed and prodded with painkillers, IV tubes and the works.

    “I was shocked, confused, and in absolute terror,” recalls Wong, 35. Finally, the induction failed and she had to be wheeled in for emergency caesarean. Thankfully, she delivered a healthy baby boy weighing 3.9kg. When she got home, she struggled with breastfeeding and suffered a severe bout of post-natal blues.

    “I felt ‘cheated’ … ” Wong admits. Her son is now seven. “I was a newbie to the birthing process and was meek as a lamb led to the slaughter,” she adds. “If I’d known then what I know now, I probably would have been better prepared, stood my ground and not undergone early inducement.”
    Though doctors play a role in giving women the necessary information about labour options, women and their partners need to take their share of responsibility too in making informed choices and decisions.

    Wong’s experience isn’t unique.

    “We see a fair amount of women who are unhappy about the outcome of their deliveries,” says Jennifer Hor of Jenlia Maternal Services. The UK-trained midwife has been running ante-natal classes and post-natal home visits for 17 years. “Some felt they had a C-section even though they didn’t want it. Or, some felt they didn’t get enough information from their doctors.”

    So, are women less assertive when it comes to childbirth? Are they getting or finding the information necessary to make informed choices and decisions? And have we forgotten that childbirth, an age-old practice, is meant to be natural?

    Birth trends

    … the medicalisation of childbirth means what used to be a straightforward, natural process is now treated as a high-tech medical procedure.

    Caesarean rates are on the rise in both developed and developing countries …

    … “Women say they want to take ownership of their bodies, yet we have healthy, low-risk women who said they had a C-section for their first births because they listened to their doctors,” says Farouk, who also sub-specialises in reproductive medicine. And because of the risks from the first surgery, these women are requesting for repeat C-sections. “Ironically, women are pushing the trends that way.

    “We are also seeing the use of more technology to manage pregnant mothers, for example using CTG (cardiotocography) … and ultrasound scans,” says Farouk. “It’s not all bad, but if you monitor too much, you might pick up something and wonder if you don’t take action, there might be consequences, hence the interventions.”

    … Doctors come with their beliefs and agendas, based on experiences. Some underplay certain risks and amplify others. For instance, placental calcification … is not a major issue for some obstetricians if the woman is near term and foetal growth is normal. But for a different doctor, a few specks on the ultrasound scan is reason enough for labour induction.

    “There can be grey areas in medical investigations. I tend to be more conservative with placental calcification and continue to monitor foetal health and growth parameters,” …

    Also, fear of litigation is scaring obstetricians into defensive and often interventionist practices.

    “An obstetrician is more likely to be subjected to litigation because a caesarean section was not performed or was perceived to have been performed too late …”

    Medical interventions

    Clearly, it’s not always true that C-sections or epidural blocks are being foisted on reluctant women. The fact is, some women don’t question their doctors, or they themselves are asking for interventions.

    Labour induction, elective caesarean, epidural jabs, and routine episiotomy are some of the common medical interventions during childbirth.

    Induction of labour … is usually done when the mother’s or baby’s health is at risk …

    “For such cases, studies have shown that caesarean section rate has been unchanged or lower among the induced group as compared with expectant management of pregnancy … ”

    “But induction of labour at 37 to 41 weeks on non-medical grounds is linked with an increased risk of caesarean section for … a woman who has never given birth and an increased risk of instrumental delivery,” …

    No doubt, medical interventions can be a lifesaver for mothers and babies …

    However, once the natural process of labour and birth has been disturbed, if there is no actual emergency, there is risk that the side effects of the treatment will trigger more intervention necessary to fix the problem. This sequence of events is called the “cascade of interventions”.

    “Pitocin (Syntocinon), a synthetic form of the hormone oxytocin used to induce or speed up labour, often results in a rapid increase in the intensity and strength of the woman’s contractions. As a result, she may opt to use pain medications such as pethidine … or epidural anaesthetic. Babies sometimes don’t react favourably to the sudden increase in the intensity of the contractions, which may result in irregularities of the heartbeat. Thus in turn may necessitate delivery by caesarean,” …

    “Many women who use epidural do not experience the urges to bear down which help them to birth their babies. Often, in this situation, the doctor will use forceps or vacuum to deliver the baby, which means he needs to do an episiotomy … Many women experience long-term perineal pain following episiotomy.”

    A failed induction (when labour doesn’t started after the first cycle of treatment) can either require a rescheduled induction or emergency C-section.

    “Women should received accurate information about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of induced labour and understand the possible side effects and interventions, ” …

    The big ‘C’

    Most women also come with the preconceived idea that C-sections are safer than vaginal delivery …

    … “In fact, C-section, which is classed as a major surgical procedure, carries with it the risk of complications and shouldn’t be viewed as an alternative option to normal birth.”

    … “Babies delivered by elective caesarean section at 37 to 39 weeks’ of pregnancy are at two to four times more likely to suffer from respiratory morbidity compared with babies delivered by vaginal delivery,” … WHO global maternal survey also finds that women who choose elective caesarean with no medical indication are at increased risk of maternal death and serious complications.

    … Studies have linked depression and distress after birth, which affect up to one in five women, to forceps and caesarean births …

    Disturbed birth

    “You must be mad to give birth without an epidural!” A common reaction these days if you speak with women who have undergone labour. But as the WHO states, “epidural analgesia is one of the most striking examples of the medicalisation of normal birth, transforming a physiological event into a medical procedure.”

    … in her book,Gentle birth, gentle mothering, internationally acclaimed birth expert Dr Sarah J. Buckley explains how epidurals or painkilling drugs and synthetic hormones (used during induction) interfere with some of the major hormones of labour and birth. The five major hormones: oxytocin (hormones of love); beta-endorphin (pleasure and transcendence); the catecholamines or CAs, epinephrine and norepinephrine (excitement); and prolactin (tender mothering) form a “cocktail of hormones that nature prescribes to aid birthing mothers of all mammalian species”.

    During an undisturbed labour, these hormones rise in crescendo and peak around the time of birth or soon after for mother and baby, and subside over the following hours and days. “An optimal hormonal orchestration provides ease, pleasure, and safety during this time for mother and baby.” Interference with this process, by injecting drugs or synthetic hormones, will “disrupt the hormonal orchestration, making birth more difficult and painful, and potentially less safe”.

    For example, epidurals lower the mother’s production of oxytocin or stop its normal rise during labour. Oxytocin causes a woman’s uterus to contract in labour. It peaks at birth and catalyses for the final powerful contractions of labour, and helps mother and baby to fall in love at first meeting.

    Under stressful conditions, our body releases epinephrine and norepinephrine (CAs). Towards the end of an undisturbed labour, the mother experiences an adrenaline rush – the natural surge in these hormones gives her the energy to push her baby out, makes her excited and fully alert at first meeting with her baby.

    But when a woman feels fearful or unsafe, her labour is inhibited by high CA levels. Epidurals reduce the release of the CAs, which may be helpful if the high levels are restricting her labour. However, a reduction in the final CA surge may make it difficult for the woman to push her baby out, thus increasing the risk of instrumental delivery (forceps and vacuum).

    Epidural’s side effects include nausea, slowing of labour and drop in blood pressure, slowing of contractions, and headache.

    35-year-old Laila Aziz of Kuala Lumpur was wheelchair-bound for four months after an epidural jab injured her nerves when she delivered her third child.

    “I wish my O&G and the anaesthetist had explained in details the pros and cons of using an epidural,” says Laila, who suffered severe post-natal blues after childbirth. “I would at least reconsider whether to use the option at that time.”

    … Childbirth educator and lactation consultant Christine Choong has been advocating natural childbirth for the past two decades.

    “My main passion is how birthing practices affect breastfeeding. What happens when you’re in labour can have a long-term effect on your breastfeeding,” …

    Research has shown that when you put a baby on his mother’s chest (skin-to-skin contact) immediately after he was born, the baby will crawl instinctively towards her breast.

    “Quite often the baby won’t do that if you had used drugs during labour … because he will be drowsy the first two to three days,” … “If women use epidural, very often their babies are delivered by suction or forceps which can cause discomfort on baby’s head (a shock to the system) and baby initially will not be happy feeding on one side or the other.”

    Whether a labour induction is done on medical grounds or not, the baby is – by definition – relatively immature and likely to have impaired ability to effectively coordinate sucking, swallowing, and breathing at breast …

    “In a C-section delivery, very rarely the mother is given the baby straight away,” Christine adds. “Early stimulation or suckling is important to establish breastfeeding. Also a higher percentage of caesarean babies end up with respiratory problems, which results in separation of mom and baby.”

    But we need to look at the whole picture – the impact on baby, feeding, and mother-baby relationship.

    “It isn’t just feeding but also nurturing,” says Christine, a mother of three.

    “When babies are nurtured and their needs are met, in the long term, they will become people who are secure, confident, and know how to form relationships with people.”

    Take control

    What do you do if your care provider says you or your baby is at risk and an intervention is necessary?

    “Using evidence-based information, your doctor should explain the reason for any suggested interventions. He should also explain the benefits and risks of such procedures,” advises Choong. If you’re not sure or not too convinced by your doctor’s explanation, get a second opinion.”

    “Empowerment with the correct knowledge and information is useful so women can ask the correct questions,” Chow adds. “And their fear of childbirth should be addressed by getting support and learning about the labour process and pain relief options.”

    Ultimately, a woman’s satisfaction with her birth experience is related more to her involvement in decision-making than to the outcome, as Buckley emphasises. Though doctors play a role in giving women the necessary information, women and their partners need to take their share of responsibility too in making informed choices and decisions.

    When Wong had her second child, she was more mentally and emotionally prepared.

    “Although I ended up having another C-section (due to hypertension), I didn’t feel disappointed and helpless,” Wong says. “I felt as if I was a real mom this time around.”

    As Buckley sums it up best, “birth is the beginning of life; the beginning of mothering and of fathering. We all deserve a good beginning.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    New unit a ‘home birth in hospital’

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    MONA Vale Hospital’s new birthing unit will simply be a place for expectant mothers to have a home birth inside a hospital – but a long way from emergency care if a complication occurs – according to an obstetrician.

    How anyone can consider a hospital birth to be the same as a homebirth is way beyond me! There is a very big difference between the comfort and familiarity of our homes, and a hospital environment.

    Dr David Jollow, one of Mona Vale Hospital’s onsite obstetricians, said the new, midwife-run, Mona Vale birthing unit would mean women who suffer a complication during labour will have to be rushed to Manly Hospital instead of being treated by Mona Vale’s onsite obstetricians.

    “The new unit is essentially a home birth that happens to be in a hospital,” Dr Jollow said.

    “It would actually be safer to have a home birth in Balgowlah or Seaforth, because an ambulance ride to Manly would be quicker.”

    It’s interesting that obstetricians oppose free-standing birth centres, yet we have the existence of midwife-run units where obstetricians are not available. Is ther a differnence? Is it merely a differing terminology to be acceptable to some?

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Who controls childbirth: women or doctors?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    That I am pregnant again is an act of either incredible optimism or mind-blowing amnesia. As the sonogram technician squirts jelly over my abdomen for my 20-week checkup, I think it’s the latter. Watching this baby, who the tech tells me is a boy, I am not caught up in visions of his future; I’m caught up in visions of mine. All of a sudden, I know with a certainty I haven’t allowed myself to confront before: Somehow, I am going to have to deliver this baby.
    Obviously, you say. But my first birth was traumatic, and although my son and I emerged fine, I lost a year seeking treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder and all the depression, fear and anger it brings. I imitated mothers who seemed normal to me, cooing and tickling my son. In truth, I was a zombie, obsessing about how I had ever let what happened happen.

    What happened is this: In my 39th week, I am induced because of high blood pressure. At the hospital, I am given Pitocin, a synthetic form of the labor-inducing hormone oxytocin, and Cervidil, a vaginal insert used to dilate the cervix. Within two hours, my contractions are one minute apart. I had lasted as long as I could without an epidural because I had read that they sometimes slow dilation. That’s the last thing I need: I’m at a pathetic 2 centimeters. My doctor comes up with a solution for the pain: a syringe full of a narcotic called Stadol.

    “I have a history of anxiety,” I tell the nurse who has brought in the syringe, as I always warn any medical professional who wants to give me drugs. “Is this drug OK for me?” “It sure is,” she says.

    It is not. Within 10 seconds, I begin hallucinating. For five hours, I hallucinate that I’m on a swing that’s soaring too high, that houses are flying at my face. My husband has fallen asleep on the cot next to me, and I’m convinced that if awakened, he will turn into a monster — literally. I’m aware this notion is irrational, that these images are hallucinations. But they are terrifying. I buzz the nurse. “Sometimes that happens,” she says …

    By noon the next day, 24 hours after I had arrived, I am only 3 centimeters dilated. The new nurse, a nice lady, tells me the induction isn’t working. “Your blood pressure isn’t even high anymore,” she says. “Tell the doctor you want to go home.”

    When my OB comes in, I say, “I’d like to stop this induction, if that’s possible. I’m worn out. I hallucinated all night … I just don’t think this is working out.”

    “OK,” he says. “Let me examine you. If you’re still not dilating, we’ll talk about going home.”

    My previous dilation exams had been quick and painless, if not entirely pleasant. This one takes a long time. Suddenly, it hurts. “What are you doing?” I scream. “Why does it hurt?”

    No answer.

    “He’s not examining me,” I scream at my husband. “He’s doing something!” My husband grips my hand, frozen, unsure.

    I scream to the nurse, the nice one who had suggested I go home. “What is he doing?” She doesn’t answer me, either. I writhe under the doctor’s grasp. The pain is excruciating.

    The first sound I hear is the doctor’s directive to the nurse, in a low voice: “Get me the hook.”

    I know the hook is for breaking my water, to speed my delivery by force. I scream, “Get off of me!” He looks up at me, as if annoyed that the specimen is talking. I imagine him thinking of the cadavers he worked on in medical school, how they didn’t scream, how they let him do whatever he wanted.

    “You’re not going anywhere,” he says. He breaks my water and leaves. The nurse never looks me in the eye again.

    Eleven more futile hours of labor later, I am exhausted and terrified when the doctor comes in and claps his hands together. “Time for a C-section,” he says. I consider not signing the consent form, ripping off these tubes and monitors, and running. But the epidural I’d finally gotten won’t allow me to stand up.

    It’s nearly midnight when I hear a cry. My first emotion is surprise; I had almost forgotten I was there to have a baby.

    I was desperate to find someone who could tell me what had happened to me was normal. To say, “You hallucinated? Oh, me, too.” Or “My doctor broke my water when I wasn’t looking. Isn’t that the worst?” Nothing …

    Now, I’d never loved my doctor … I’d found him patronizing — “Normal!” he’d shout at me, when I asked a question — I thought his assuredness might be a good antidote to my anxiousness. It seemed to work, until it didn’t.

    … I also didn’t have a birth plan … Sure, I had a plan for the birth: Have a baby using whatever breathing method I’d learned in the hospital’s birth-preparedness class, maybe get an epidural. But I didn’t have the piece of paper that so many of my friends have brought to the hospital with them … in my opinion, the very act of creating such a contract was to ignore what labor is: something unpredictable that you are in no way qualified to dictate.

    … people who hear my story ask … Did I consider a home birth? A midwife instead of an obstetrician? … The answer is no. I am not holistically minded. My philosophy was simple: Everyone I know has been born. It can’t be that complicated.

    The women who ask me about my preparations for my first son’s birth — who imply with these questions that I could have prevented what happened to me if I’d been more diligent — are part of an informal movement of women who are trying to “take back” their birth — take it back from the hospital, the insurers and anyone else who thinks he can call the shots.

    But hospitals aren’t so interested in giving women back their birth … stipulations dealing with labor and delivery (“I want only one medical professional in the room at a time”) garner barely a glance. University OB/GYN in Provo, Utah, even has a sign that reads, “…we will not participate in: a ‘Birth Contract’, a Doulah [sic] Assisted, or a Bradley Method delivery. For those patients who are interested in such methods, please notify the nurse so we may arrange transfer of your care.”

    … This question of whether I could have prevented my trauma has lingered in my mind since that day; now that I am pregnant again, it has become deafening. I have a chance to do it all over. Would I benefit from thinking more holistically? Should I bother taking back my birth?

    During my pregnancies, friends gave me two books; their spines are still barely cracked. The first is called “Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth.” … The other book is “Your Best Birth” by Ricki Lake and Abby Epstein; it’s an offshoot of their 2008 documentary, “The Business of Being Born.” Their urgent message is that women who want to deliver vaginally can do so if no one intervenes. Instead, doctors and hospitals are doing all they can to “help” the laboring woman along … and failing. Inductions like mine, epidurals given early in labor, continuous fetal-heart monitoring — all of them have been associated with a higher risk for cesarean section. The result is an epidemic — 32 percent of U.S. births were C-sections at last count, the highest rate in our history. Individual surgeries may be medically necessary, but as a matter of public health, the best outcomes for mothers and babies come with a rate of no more than 15 percent, according to the World Health Organization.

    Sam … was five months pregnant when watching “The Business of Being Born” convinced her that hospitals could be dangerous and a home birth would be more meaningful. She and her husband found a midwife … and spent the rest of the pregnancy preparing.

    After 24 hours of labor, Sam’s contractions were two or three minutes apart, yet when her midwife examined her, she was only 3 centimeters dilated. The midwife gently told her that she was nowhere close to delivering, despite her contractions, exhaustion and pain. Sam asked to be taken to the hospital.

    The change of scenery did her good. “At that point, I had been in labor for 40 hours,” she says. “I entered the relaxed zone. The epidural took the edge off … It was a sacred space.”

    After her son’s delivery, Sam passed out, having lost 50 percent of her blood volume in a postpartum hemorrhage. Needless to say, she was relieved that she was in a place where blood transfusions were readily available … she believes she will want midwife care at a hospital next time.

    … Bialik’s first birth didn’t go the way she wanted. After three days of labor at home, she stalled at 9 centimeters, one short of the goal. Her midwife suggested they go to the hospital, where after a natural childbirth, Bialik’s son spent four days in the neonatal intensive-care unit. “My son was born with a low temperature and low blood sugar, which isn’t unusual in light of the fact that I had gestational diabetes,” she explains. “I understand doctors need to err on the side of caution, but there was nothing wrong with my child. All of our plans for bed sharing, nursing on demand, bathing him — gone.”

    The experience was scarring. “I felt a sense of failure that I had to call my parents from the hospital,” Bialik continues. “Yes, I know vaginal birth in the hospital is the next best thing to a home birth.” …

    I point out that natural childbirth in the hospital — her “failure” — was my best-case scenario. But I also understand when she says, “Everyone is allowed her own sense of loss.” She realized her vision when her second son was born at home.

    The second time around
    I don’t consider myself a candidate for a home birth. The risk of uterine rupture from an attempt at vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) makes it unthinkable … I’m also not really interested in a home birth … But I’m also not interested in another C-section …

    So I’d like to attempt a VBAC, but I know that it doesn’t always succeed. I have a new doctor — the 10th I interviewed following my son’s birth — at a new hospital, and he has agreed to help me try. But my primary goal is more modest: not to be retraumatized. Even now, my heart pounds at the sight of hospital receiving blankets, the antiseptic smell of the maternity ward.

    The common thread in Bialik’s and Sam’s stories that impressed me was how supported and safe they felt with their midwife …

    In an e-mail Bialik sends after our meeting, she goes back to my idea that some women weren’t meant to have babies the holistic way. “There are those among us who believe that if the baby can’t survive a home labor, it is OK for it to pass peacefully,” she writes. “I do not subscribe to this, but I know that some feel that … if a baby cannot make it through birth, it is not favored evolutionarily.”

    I think about my appendectomy, back in 2003. Had I not made it to the hospital in time, I would be dead. What would it be like to refuse medical intervention? I’d call my family, say my good-byes. “I’m sorry,” I’d say. “But I’m not evolutionarily favored. It’s time for me to go.”

    This attitude, that everything was better back when there were no doctors, seems strange to me. C-sections, although certainly done too often, can save lives. Orthodox Jews still say the same prayer after childbirth that those who have been in near-death experiences say — and with good reason. A birth that leaves mother and child healthy may be commonplace, but it’s also a miracle every time.

    As the weeks pass and my belly grows, I can’t stop thinking about Sam. Her pregnancy was a sacred time, and she had truly looked forward to labor. Is that what I should try for — a meaningful birth, as well as an untraumatic one? At what point had people like Sam and me learned to feel entitled to a meaningful birth?

    “I think that birth should be a beautiful experience,” says obstetrician Kimberly D. Gregory, M.D. She’s the vice chair of women’s health care quality and performance improvement at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in L.A. “It should be exactly the way you want it, and doctors should intervene only to preserve the health or life of you or your baby.”

    Naturally, one would assume that Dr. Gregory advocates birth plans. When I ask her this, she laughs. “We always say, ‘If you show up with a birth plan, just get the C-section room ready,’” she says. “You get everything on that list that you don’t want. It’s like a self-fulfilling prophecy.” Dr. Gregory led an unpublished study that compared women who took traditional hospital birth classes with those who employed Bradley-like training and a birth plan. The birth-plan group trended toward a higher C-section rate and more interventions. “There’s a certain personality type that tends to be more anxious. Maybe the anxiety hormones themselves put them at risk,” Dr. Gregory theorizes. “It seems that being open and honest and choosing the right doctor is probably a better option than writing everything down. Walking in with this list appears to set up an antagonistic relationship.” …

    … In the past three weeks, I’ve had the same dream. I’m in a field (I believe at Ina May Gaskin’s Farm), and women in braids are dancing around me as my baby is born, painlessly, joyously. As I reach down, I notice my C-section scar is gone.

    I wake up upset. Am I truly under the impression, subconscious though it may be, that taking back this birth will undo the damage of the last one?

    “I don’t understand this phrase ‘take back your birth,’” nurse-midwife Pam England, creator of “Birthing From Within,” … tells me. “Who took it? What would a woman tell herself it meant about her if she failed to meet the criteria she made up for ‘taking back’ her birth? I am concerned that this phrase, meant to generate action and a feeling of empowerment, may actually be generated by or feeding the victim part of her.”

    England is right: Having a childbirth that I deem successful this time will not change what I haven’t overcome from the first. I try to find a way to make what my doctor and nurses did to me OK, but my mind rebels. I feel loss — no, theft — of an opportunity for me to have a baby the way so many other women do: a carefree pregnancy, a labor that could still go any way.

    Maybe I’m not so different from the women I spoke with, after all. Bialik had a successful natural childbirth but felt like a failure because it was in the hospital. Women who had a C-section also used words like failure. Perhaps part of the problem is that our generation of women is so ambitious, so driven, that we don’t know how to do anything without quantifying it as a success or failure.

    According to Dr. Gregory, women are now requesting a C-section for their first birth, even without indication. “A lot of people are uncomfortable with the unknown,” she says. Plenty of people are wary of C-sections by choice, from holistic moms to obstetricians. But isn’t this, too, taking back your birth? Refusing to be out of control seems to me the epitome of taking it back. You don’t have to have an unattended birth in the woods to be considered a real woman.

    Deciding that you can’t control the uncontrollable — and committing to that decision when you are, in fact, out of control — is also taking back your birth. It’s what your grandmothers did. It’s what their grandmothers did.

    With this, I realize that I have already taken back my birth, but not as part of any movement. I have stopped judging women who take extra precautions as defensive and started to understand that everyone has to find her way.

    I don’t know how this story ends. I’m still not convinced my body was made to deliver vaginally. But here’s what I do know: I will insist on kindness. I will insist on care. And I hope I will be open to being treated kindly. It’s harder than it seems.

    I have another hope, too. I hope there will be a moment when … I will look down at my baby — whether he is handed to me on my belly or from behind a curtain as my body is sewn shut — and I will remember what I’ve known from the beginning, when I looked down at that plus sign and we were alone together for the first time. Before these questions wrapped around my neck, choking me for answers. I will know that I am his mother and he is my son. And maybe, in that moment, I will be ready to say that the only success and failure is the outcome of the birth, that we are healthy …

    I’m concerned that birth is defined in terms of success and failure, and that after this author’s journey, she has determined that health is the only important factor. In this day and age, it is entirely possible to have a safe VBAC – a safe birth experience as well as a satisfying one. The vast majority of women who choose VBAC will be successful provided that they choose the right care provider.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Study Measures Gestational Diabetes Risk

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Pregnant women who develop gestational diabetes during their first pregnancy are at increased risk for developing this condition in their second or third pregnancies …

    … gestational diabetes … affects about 4% of all pregnancies, according to the American Diabetes Association.

    In the new study of 65,132 pregnant women, those who had gestational diabetes during their first pregnancy had a 13.2-fold increased risk of developing gestational diabetes in their second pregnancy.

    Those who had gestational diabetes in their first pregnancy but not their second had a 6.3-fold increased risk for developing this condition during their third pregnancy, and those women who had gestational diabetes in their first and second pregnancies had close to a 26-fold increased risk for developing gestational diabetes in their third pregnancy, the study showed …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Fancy giving birth with just essential oils for pain relief?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Aromatherapy is being offered to women in labour at Southmead Hospital as a natural pain relief … midwives have been trained to mix a range of oils to ease symptoms for women giving birth at the hospital and in their own homes.

    The oils … have been found to have therapeutic effects and are used in massage, in a bath or dropped onto a smelling stick.

    Bergamot, jasmine, lavender, peppermint, grapefruit, clary sage and frankincense are being used by the midwives to ease symptoms such as nausea and back pain.

    … being more relaxed during labour generally helps the birth progress more smoothly.

    … a woman who had planned a natural birth and opted for the essential oils could turn to an epidural afterwards should they need it.

    … It is hoped that offering women aromatherapy will support the drive from the Department of Health for more women to give birth naturally.

    The oils will generally be used in lower risk births … which is generally the criteria for women giving birth in their own homes or in the birth suite at Southmead, which is run by midwives rather than doctors to make it a more relaxed environment.

    Previously midwives had only been able to offer women gas and air in their own homes but the aromatherapy provides more options.

    Essential oils costs less than 50p per person …

    It would be great if this could be implemented across Australian hopsitals – public and private. It seems that the UK has a huge drive at present to increase the rates of normal, natural birth. What is preventing Australia from following suit?

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Canadian Researchers Suggest Review Of Current Guidelines On C-Sections

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A recent study showing that the rate of cesarean sections performed at hospitals across … Canada, varied between less than 15% and more than 27% — with only 2% requested by the women — prompted researchers to recommend “revising the current guidelines” on when it is appropriate to perform a c-section … Difficult labor was found to be the most prevalent cause for a c-section …

    It will be interesting to read what the new guidelines say. Certainly, some factors promote vaginal birth such as staying at home for as long as possible in labour, planning a homebirth, receiving midwifery care, being well prepared – emotionally, mentally and physically – for birth, reading widely about pregnancy and birth to be well-informed and more comfortable with the process and having the continued support of a midwife who is experienced in supporting women through natural birth.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    framework for privately practicing midwives

    The Quality and Safety Framework is not out yet in its final version. A final draft has come out and it is now in the hands of the Nursing and Midwifery Board to accept or reject the Framework in whole or in part. I will update this blog once I know more details about the QSF.

    Midwifery in the home nsw legal

    Yes, midwifery is – and will remain – legal at home.

    Private health insurance, private midwifery care, australia

    Yes, Private Health Insurance may cover the cost of private midwifery care. Some health funds are more generous in their benefits than other funds so it’s worth doing your homework before becoming pregnant so you can get the cover that’s most advantageous.

    Private midwife vs obstetrician

    The role of the obstetrician is to provide care for women with complicated pregnancies and births, so they’re called in to manage things that are not seen to be progressing normally. The role of the midwife is to take care of healthy, well pregnant and birthing women (and their babies) and to refer to obstetricians when it’s necessary. Private midwifery care is holistic in nature, so women can expect that their midwife will be interested in getting to know them, they can expect their pregnancy consultations to be very thorough and to last for 1-2 hours. Private midwives attend the whole labour and birth, we do not just attend for the end of birth. Private midwives take on a much lower caseload – you’ll be hard-pressed to find midwives with more than 4 births a month, so we’re more available to our clients.

    Water birth experts australia

    That would be a midwife! More specifically, a private midwife or birth centre midwife. We regularly attend waterbirths.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448