Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

Birth choices

“I’ve been told my baby is big”

and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Cascade of intervention

A study has found that first-time mothers who have their care within the general hospital system and have their labour induced, face a greater risk of having a caesarean section than those who wait for labour to start on its own.

In the study, 44 percent women had their labour induced, and 20% of those inductions failed (ie, labour did not start) and caesareans were performed in those cases.

By definition, induction is performed before a woman’s body is ready for labour, and this may point to the reason for such a high rate of failed inductions. In other cases, the reason for the induction is also the reason that the caesarean became necessary. For example, a labour may be induced because of concerns for the baby, and once in labour, the baby shows signs that it is not tolerating labour well and so a caesarean is performed.

The study does point to the issue that inductions should not be performed unless they are genuinely necessary. Up to 50% inductions may not be “indicated”, that is, performed for a medical reason. They might be performed more for convenience, for example. However, if we limit inductions to those which really need to be done, we would lower the caesarean rate.

There are some reasons when an induction might be a good idea, such as when the woman’s blood pressure is high, if the pregnancy goes beyond 42 weeks, if the waters have broken for many hours and labour has not started, if there are concerns for the baby and so on.

Before any induction is commenced, it’s important that women are fully informed by their care provider of the reasons for the induction, the alternatives, the process and procedure, what to expect and the likely outcome.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What are the best positions for labour?

The best positions for labour and birth will be the positions that are the most comfortable for the woman. These are usually also the positions that will assist the baby into a good position to be born.

The positions you decide to use will have an effect on your sense of control and how you experience your labour. Generally, women who are able to move around as they need to, will expefince labour more positively and as being less painful, than women who are confined to the bed.

There are many positions that women will naturally adopt in labour, such as:
- Standing
- Leaning over a bench or couch
- All fours positions
- Kneeling positions
- Walking
- Lying on your side

Because gravity helps the baby’s head to descend deeply into the pelvis, upright positions are generally better for aiding progress in labour while also reducing pain. This is because upright positions work with the body in labour, rather than against it.

Many women choose to birth in the water because the sensation of being in water combined with the lack of gravity makes them feel more mobile and able to position in the best way possible to help the baby move through the pelvis.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Natural Twin Birth

I had a difficult delivery with my first baby, including posterior presentation, premature rupture of membranes, meconium staining, stalled labour, 18 hours of Syntocinon, a largely ineffectual epidural, a 4 hour second stage, and forceps delivery. My daughter had severe respiratory distress and was in the NICU for several days. It was a very tough introduction to parenthood and left me quite traumatised, especially the separation from my daughter. My husband and I decided that we would try for a homebirth if we had another baby, in the hope that a calmer environment would assist the birth process. When I fell pregnant again, we found a lovely homebirth midwife.

I started to show really early. At 8 weeks I was in maternity wear. I thought it was just because it was a second pregnancy, but a 9 week ultrasound showed TWO BABIES. We were completely shocked as there are no twins in my family. Twins of course meant that a homebirth was out of the question.

There followed many long months of argument with various obstetricians about our birth choices. We wanted as little intervention as possible. A standard twin delivery involves syntocinon (which I was very afraid of, after the previous experience), continuous monitoring (which I had hated with my first birth, as I felt chained to the bed) and an epidural prior to the second stage, in case positioning/version or a c-section is necessary to deliver the second twin. In my first birth, the epidural meant I had no pushing urge and seriously compromised my ability to deliver my daughter, hence the very prolonged second stage, so I did not want an epidural this time around, although I was prepared for Synto to be administered between the twins if labour did not re-establish. The hospital also wanted both twins delivered on the bed, which I did not agree with as I had found pushing in that position impossible the first time around. Our views were very challenging to the obstetricians and some were quite aggressive about it, although I must say the head OB was more reasonable and was prepared to admit that my refusal to consent to an epidural would be a “complete contraindication” to giving me one! Throughout this stage our midwife was a pillar of strength and information. She gave us the courage of our convictions and more than once came to the hospital to talk with the obstetricians on our behalf. Even so, the hospital was very unhappy with our birth preferences. It was a stressful time, helped somewhat by a Calmbirth ® course.

In the end all our arguments ended up being moot. At 33 weeks, I started to feel an ominous itching all over. Tests showed elevated bile salts and poor liver function results. I had obstetric cholestasis. Our midwife and the hospital agreed: the babies would need to be delivered by 37 weeks. And I knew that that early, an induction would almost certainly involve Syntocinon.

This was really difficult for me to accept. I was terribly afraid of the drug, and knew that Synto would mean continuous monitoring and therefore limit my movement, which I also feared. However, I knew that my fear would make the delivery more difficult and the pain worse. At this point the hospital dropped the bombshell that despite all their delivery rooms having deep birthing baths, I would not be allowed to use those or the shower if I had to have Synto, as they believe this risks pump damage to the Synto pump. Essentially this meant I was walking into a labour that was likely to be more painful, with less pain relief options. It was going to be down to Calmbirth ® alone, if I wanted to avoid drugs (and I did!).

I did a lot of Calmbirth ® practice from then on. But the Calmbirth ® visualisation exercises presupposed a normal delivery without intervention, and I found it very upsetting to listen to them. I hit on the idea of doing my own visualisations, of a medicalised induction process. After a few of these I was able to work through some of my fears.

On the day of the induction, we kissed our daughter goodbye at 5am and met our midwife at the hospital. Preliminary checks showed a Bishop score of 5, very promising for 36 weeks. The hospital midwife applied prostaglandin gel and sent us out to freedom. We had a lovely breakfast. I started to have sporadic contractions but nothing serious. We returned to the hospital 6 hours later. My cervix had ripened to 2cm, and the very cheerful OB was able to break the waters for twin 1 (our second daughter) at 3.45pm. No meconium staining! I dared to ask the OB how she was presenting. ANTERIOR, WOOHOO! I was very pleased with that.

Contractions came rather more strongly after that point, but were still sporadic. The felt very “knifey”, and our midwife explained this was from the prostaglandin gel. We held off on the Synto as long as possible, but at 6.25pm the drip was put up and contractions started in earnest. Continuous monitoring was in place, but via telemetry so I could have moved. Ironically, though, I didn’t feel the need to. I went deep into calm breathing and spent most of the labour sitting beside the bed on a fit ball, sometimes circling my hips but more often just breathing to ride the contractions with my husband stroking my back. Unlike my first labour, I had no real idea of when the next contraction was coming, and ended up doing my calm breathing (in for 4, out for 6) solidly for hours. I wasn’t afraid of the contractions. I could really feel them doing their work, and little twin 1 moving firm and fast down. I was determined to “get out of the way” of labour and with each contraction focused on opening up and not clenching against the pain. Our midwife was convinced things were going quickly and asked us when we thought we would be having the babies. I told her anything before midnight was a sucker bet! She said 11pm.

At 8.30pm, about 2 hours after I started having regular contractions, the pain was starting to get BIG. The OB did a cervix check – I was 5cm. I was very disheartened by this, but our midwife told me that the first 5cm was the hardest, and the very encouraging OB tried to convince me that it wasn’t all about centimetres and that my cervix felt promisingly thin and stretchy. In hindsight, even in my first labour I dilated from 5 to 10cm in under an hour, so I should have known what was coming – but I didn’t!

Throughout this time I was not making any noise. The hospital’s midwife didn’t seem to think I was in established labour, and threatened to up the Synto dose to make the contractions “strong and regular”, even though they were already sufficient to dilate my cervix 3cm in under 2 hours. I managed to insist “no. more. Synto!” She reserved judgement, but it might have been the adrenaline kick I needed, as by 9.15pm I was having enormous contractions every 2-3 minutes. I could feel them as a giant swelling band of pain stretching around my whole belly and stretching lower. At this point I started vocalising “ah, ah, ah” throughout contractions, to help me ride the pain and stop me clenching down. I remember saying “if this isn’t transition, I’m in trouble!” I didn’t believe it could be transition, though – not so early, not when my first birth had taken almost 3 days. Our midwife said she thought we would have babies by 10pm, and I didn’t believe her.

I needed to get off the fit ball and change position, and asked if I could get on all fours, although the idea of moving seemed impossible to imagine. The hospital midwife set up a crash mat and a nice beanbag for me to lean on. I leaned forward and within one contraction of moving had started making some amazing noises. Unlike my “ah ah ahs” they were completely involuntary. And then I could feel twin 1 crowning. I did not believe it had happened so quickly, and cried out “what’s happening?” Everyone still makes fun of me for this. She was born in only a couple of pushes at 9.25pm, and our midwife had to tell the hospital midwife to put her gloves on to catch her. Our beautiful daughter, with a lovely round head, pink skin and a great big yell! There is a photo of me still on all fours, with a blissed-out grin. I could not believe how easy and quick it had been. I got to hold her straight away, but contractions started up again quite quickly, and she went to her daddy for some skin to skin time.

At this point the obstetricians arrived – a registrar and resident. I wanted to stay on the floor, but the registrar managed to persuade me up on the bed to check twin 2′s position, as we knew he was breech. Contractions started up again within minutes and were really agonising now, as I had lost my Calmbirth focus and as the position (twin 2′s spine to mine) had that sort of posterior feeling to it. But within seconds I was again feeling the inexorable urge to push. The OB flicked twin 2′s feet out as he was in a squatting position, the midwife and OB flexed twin 2′s head by pushing on my stomach and with a few mighty pushes he was out too, at 9.39pm. Our son! He was handed to me but unlike J, had a bit of trouble breathing, and spent some time in the special care nursery. He was back to us almost before we knew it. I must say he had a very breech-looking head, which looked like a mighty frown, but he’s ever so handsome and cheerful now.

J weighed in at 2.98kg (I was really ticked off she could not stretch to the extra 20gm), and P weighed 3.06kg, excellent weights for 36 weekers, let alone twins!

After twin 2 was out, I lost all patience for the pain – rather a pity as the Synto kept getting ramped up to deliver the placentas and then to deal with my uterus which did not want to shrink back down. I ended up with a Synto drip all night. I tell people this birth was meant to help me deal with my fear of Synto once and for all.

Both babies had beautiful breastfeeds within an hour or two of birth, which sadly was not an omen of things to come for twin 1, but it was lovely.


Anyway, that was our birth. Twins born without any pain relief (not even hot water) or really any intervention other than the induction drugs, with 4 hours of contractions total and only about 2 of those active labour. It wasn’t the birth I had wanted but it was a wonderful experience and very healing after my first daughter’s birth. I am so proud of myself, and look back on the birth with amazed gratitude all the time.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Care during Labour and Birth

A recent study from QLD has surveyed 20,371 women who recently gave birth. Experiences of pregnancy, labour, birth and after birth care were assessed for the most recent birth, retrospectively four to five months after birth. The findings were very interesting! The only issues with the data and study is that mothers self-reported their answers and there was no verification of the information, or cross-checking with the midwives and obstetricians who provided the care. In other words, it was based on women’s subjective experiences rather than what might perhaps be factual or accurate. That being said, I wanted to draw a few points out of the study and elaborate more on them. The other aspect to raise is that I am making an inference when I write about this study: the study compared women who were cared for in public facilities (public hospital delivery suites and birth centres: women who for the most part would have had public care providers) with women who gave birth in private facilities. Those women would, for the most part, have booked with a private obstetrician and given birth under their care. So from this, I am inferring that public care = care from public hospital staff where the woman does not choose her care provider; and private facility care = private obstetric care.

Care during Labour and Birth
Most women received labour and birth care from a midwife, and saw an average of 2.3 different midwives during their labour and birth. This is an interesting fact to consider, as many women believe they will have only one midwife in labour. The reality, in a hospital (public or private) is that midwives work in shifts, and there are three shifts in a day. Private midwifery and to a lesser degree, caseload models, do not work so much on shifts (although with many caseload models, the midwives are on-call for 12 hours at a time, so it is possible that you will go through two shifts of midwives even if you are only in the birthing facility for say 6 hours). Private midwives work their time around your labour, rather than the timing of a shift.

Half of all women who birthed in public facilities had never met any of their labour and birth care providers before, and this was significantly less common among women who birthed in private facilities because their obstetrician would be present for the birth, representing a familiar face. This is also an interesting point to raise: many women believe their obstetrician will be there with them during labour, or at least in the birth unit. This is not the case for the most part. For the most part, your obstetrician will be in the operating theatre, in his/her private consulting rooms or sleeping (eg if you’re labouring at night) and s/he comes in only if there is a problem and of course for the birth. Therefore, although there is continuity of sorts (the obstetrician you booked with will attend the birth), your actual care (which may be several hours) would be with midwives you have not met before, who all work in shifts. In contrast, private midwifery care is delivered by the midwife you booked with. Your private midwife would be there with you for the duration of your labour.

The majority of women in the study wanted to have a vaginal birth. Among women who wanted a vaginal birth, women who birthed in public facilities were more likely to have a vaginal birth than women who birthed in private facilities. This might be a reflection of the choices that women make, or of the recommendations of the woman’s care provider. For the purposes of the study, the private setting would have equated to private obstetric care because private midwives cannot admit directly to a private hospital. The possibility that obstetricians are influencing a caesarean rate of almost 50% in private hospitals in QLD was quite alarming, because many obstetricians would like us to believe that the caesareans that are performed are dome so because the women ask for them or because they are genuinely needed.

The truth is that with a study such as this, we will never really know. The women were surveyed 4-5 months after the birth of their baby, not before the birth. Before the birth, they may well have asked for a caesarean, but afterwards experienced too much bleeding, wound infection, pain, complications, separation from their baby and breastfeeding issues and come to regret their decision to pursue an elective caesarean. In this case, some women might have named their care provider as the one who recommended the caesarean, rather than admitting to themselves that they chose it. That is one view.

Personally, I do believe that some obstetricians have influenced the almost 50% caesarean rate. I believe this because every day I meet women who have birthed with, or are about to birth with, a private obstetrician. They tell me that they are scheduled for a caesarean, not because they have chosen this, but because it has been recommended to them. Sometimes the intention of the “recommendation” is to assist with “informed decision making”. This is where things get a bit muddied. The woman comes away believing the caesarean has been recommended, whereas the obstetrician interprets it as providing information to the woman so that she can then make an informed decision, and then reports that the caesarean was the woman’s choice. In any event, there are ways of wording things to illicit a response or decision that favours our bias. Some are more skilled at this than others.

For example, if I told you:

Caesareans have been shown in some studies to be safer for the baby, and given that your last labour was quite long and difficult, resulting in a painful forceps delivery with an episiotomy, you might like to consider a caesarean this time. Your baby would be spared the use of forceps, so he may well feed better than your last baby, because he won’t have a headache. You are also less likely to experience any pelvic floor issues. Most likely, given that you had an episiotomy last time, I might have to perform one again. I would try not to do this, but sometimes it is necessary. I know how painful the recovery was for you last time, so a caesarean might be preferable. Yes, you would still have stitches either way, but it’s far more comfortable having stitches on your tummy than your perineum.

Given this “information”, would you choose a caesarean? Possibly as this care provider has given some good arguments (some factual and others not so factual) for a caesarean, and has used emotive and persuasive language that plays on this woman’s traumatic last birth.

Now consider a different conversation:

Caesareans have been shown in some studies to be more harmful for the baby in terms of breathing difficulties and the need to admit the baby to the nursery. This would mean that you would be separated from your baby, and I know that after your last experience, you want nothing more than to hold your baby when he is born. Given that your last labour was quite long and difficult, resulting in a painful forceps delivery with an episiotomy, we can talk through some ideas to try that will minimise the risk of tearing. I believe that an intact perineum (no stitches) is absolutely possible for you. Also, there are many courses – such as Calmbirth – that will help you to manage the sensations of labour, along with labouring in a deep, warm bath. You know, I wouldn’t be surprised if you find you don’t even think of having an epidural this time! I know you’re worried that your baby might have a sore head and be a difficult feeder if forceps are needed, as this is what happened last time, but I’d like tor reassure you that forceps are really unlikely. Your body has birthed before and it will remember what to do this time. It would be very unusual that forceps would be needed again. This is a different pregnancy, different baby, different place of birth and different care provider. We can work together to make this experience very different – and very healing – from last time.

Given this “information”, would you choose to try a natural birth? Possibly as this care provider has given some good arguments for a natural birth, and has used emotive and persuasive language that plays on this woman’s traumatic last birth.

So, that is how it comes to be that women go with the recommendations of their care providers, and all the while, the care provider believes that it is the woman’s decision, while the woman believes it’s the care provider’s recommendation. If you’re now feeling very confused and like you don’t know who to trust anymore, my word of advice would be to interview a few midwives and obstetricians and ask lots of questions of them, and then go with the care provider that feels right for you. Also ensure that their statistics (birth outcomes) are aligned with the sort of birth you are trying to achieve. Once you have done this, trust your care provider and follow their advice if their advice makes sense to you and feels right. If it doesn’t, speak up and let them know.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Satisfaction and support in birth

A recent study from QLD has surveyed 20,371 women who recently gave birth. Experiences of pregnancy, labour, birth and after birth care were assessed for the most recent birth, retrospectively four to five months after birth. The findings were very interesting! The only issues with the data and study is that mothers self-reported their answers and there was no verification of the information, or cross-checking with the midwives and obstetricians who provided the care. In other words, it was based on women’s subjective experiences rather than what might perhaps be factual or accurate. That being said, I wanted to draw a few points out of the study and elaborate more on them. The other aspect to raise is that I am making an inference when I write about this study: the study compared women who were cared for in public facilities (public hospital delivery suites and birth centres: women who for the most part would have had public care providers) with women who gave birth in private facilities. Those women would, for the most part, have booked with a private obstetrician and given birth under their care. So from this, I am inferring that public care = care from public hospital staff where the woman does not choose her care provider; and private facility care = private obstetric care.

Being cared for well during pregnancy

The study found that women who birthed in private facilities were significantly more likely to say they were cared for very well during pregnancy than women who birthed in public facilities.

This is not surprising as women birthing in private facilities would be cared for in pregnancy by one obstetrician who was chosen by them.

Women who birthed in private facilities were also significantly more likely to report being treated with respect, treated with kindness and understanding, and treated as an individual by their pregnancy care providers.

This too is not surprising as their care provider was chosen by them.

Women who birthed in private facilities were also significantly more likely to say their pregnancy care providers were open and honest, respected their privacy, respected their decisions, and genuinely cared about their well-being.

This is all good news for continuity of carer models in pregnancy. Continuity of carer is very different to continuity of care. Continuity of care means continuous care from a small group of people – or even a large organisation – who shares a similar philosophy. It is interesting to see how far (and wide) this definition is stretched. Some would have us believe that we can give birth at the largest and busiest tertiary hospital as a public patient and receive continuity of care even though we had 30 care providers and never saw the same person twice. This definition – continuity of care – would still hold even in the above situation because all of the hospital staff would be working to the same philosophy and policies. Hence, continuity.

Continuity of carer, on the other hand, means that care is provided by one person for the most part. This is what we generally see with private obstetric care and private midwifery care.

Women who birthed in private facilities were more likely to say they were cared for very well in labour and birth than women who birthed in public facilities. However, the study found marked variations between public birth facilities with birth centres and midwifery-led units having the highest proportion of women saying they were cared for very well during their labour and birth.

This is good news for all those women who book with a private midwife or a public hospital-based caseload model.

Women who birthed in a private facility were generally more satisfied with the support they received after the birth, although only about 50% women were satisfied. The public hospital care rated even more poorly than that! This is evidence that the delivery of postnatal care needs to shift to meet the needs of women and babies.

Generally, women are discharged home early after the birth of their baby, with lengths of stay generally being around 24 – 48 hours in a public hospital. Women are then visited by a midwife once or twice following discharge; some hospitals provide more visits than this. Women who book with a private midwife generally enjoy more postnatal visits: 7 to 14 on average, with each visit lasting about an hour. A s well as this, women are generally prepared thoroughly in pregnancy for breastfeeding and baby care so that it is not so scary when the baby arrives.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Choosing the best care provider for your needs

Choosing the best practitioner for your needs is a very important and personal decision. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong choice: some women will choose a private obstetrician, others will choose a private midwife and others will choose public hospital care. Some women will make an initial choice of care provider and decide to change care providers during the pregnancy. Other women will make one choice in their first pregnancy and then a different choice in a subsequent pregnancy. What’s important is to have an accurate understanding all the options available so that you can feel confident to choose the best option for your needs. The best people to talk to are the people who actually provide the service, rather than a GP who is removed from the actual services of an obstetrician / midwife / public hospital. Get referred to a private obstetrician or two; interview them; reflect on how you feel after meeting them. Go and visit your local public hospital. Have a tour and speak with the midwives there. And interview a couple of eligible midwives. You do not need a GP referral to see an eligible midwife and you can claim their services through medicare. An eligible midwife is a private midwife who has met an additional registration standard that enables them to have a Medicare provider number.

When you are considering a care provider, it’s also necessary to consider where you would like to give birth and to ensure that your care provider can attend you in your chosen setting. You might choose to birth your baby in a public hospital as a public or private patient, in a private hospital as a private patient, in a birth centre or at home. It can be helpful when trying to make a decision to write down a list of questions you may have and also consider what is important to you as you make your choices. For example:

What do I want from my care?
What type of practitioner would I feel most comfortable with?
What do I need from my practitioner to feel comfortable and safe?
Do I want public or private care?
Is continuity of care important to me?

These are questions only you can answer. Other questions are for your care providers to answer with you, and it’s a good idea to interview a few care providers – midwives and obstetricians – before making a choice. Midwives and obstetricians will charge a fee for interviews and you are able to claim this through Medicare (your midwife will need to be eligible in order for you to claim a Medicare benefit). It is important during the interview that you ask all the questions that are on your mind, and to be aware of how you feel throughout the interview. Your care provider should inspire you with confidence, help you to feel at ease and comfortable, and the appointment should feel unhurried.

Likewise, your care provider may like to “interview” you, and this is so that your care provider can be sure that s/he can meet your needs. Maternity care is provided in a partnership and so it’s important that both parties feel really comfortable with the other.

There are many questions you might wish to ask your care provider; the best suggestion is to consider what is important to you and write a list of questions.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Doctors driving the increase in caesareans

Link

THE popular belief that caesareans are on the rise because women are too posh to push is incorrect, a new study shows.

University of Queensland researchers surveyed 22,000 Queensland mums …

… 48 per cent of women in private hospitals who had a caesarean did so on the recommendation of their [obstetrician].

Just under 40 per cent of women in public hospitals said the same.

… only 10 per cent said they had wanted to have their baby born that way.

“… the majority of women would prefer to have a vaginal birth,” …

“The increase in caesareans seems to be largely driven by the recommendations of doctors.”

… some women are going into the procedure underprepared.

Only 52 per cent of women … reported making an informed decision to have a planned caesarean …

Interesting research that backs up what midwives have known for a long time: the main driver for increased caesarean rates is not the mother’s choice to deliver by caesarean, but rather the recommendation of her obstetrician, who in most cases will be recommending a caesarean for non-essential reasons. I say this with confidence because upwards of 45% women do not “need” to deliver by caesarean for the sake of their babies or themselves. No-one could be justified in believing that caesarean rates this high are necessary in the majority of women who experience a healthy pregnancy. Private midwifery caesarean rates are well under 10%, with many private midwives having caesarean rates of around 5%.

The lesson is that a woman’s choice of care provider has the greatest impact on her mode of birth.

It is more important that her health issues, her choices and preferences for care, her previous birth experiences and her geographical location.

A woman’s choice of care provider will literally determine whether she undergoes a (possible unnecessary) caesarean or a natural birth. Late pregnancy and labour are not the times to be asking your care provider if their recommendations (for induction or caesarean) are truly necessary: women are simply too vulnerable in that state to make informed decision, and besides, informed decisions take take to research to come to an “informed” decision. When time is of the essence – in late pregnancy and labour – informed decision making almost goes out the window. Ultimately, the best strategy is to interview your potential care providers and peruse their statistics on birth. They say they support natural birth … but what are their stats on natural birth? What % of their patients have a caesarean, induction, epidural? If your care provider is vague and non-committal, that should speak volumes. If their rates are high and you are aiming for a low-intervention birth, it is not too late to identify this and seek a care provider whose philosophy – and outcomes – are more aligned to what you are hoping to achieve.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

I’m pregnant and I have private health insurance. What are my options?

Great question! There are a few options available to you as a private patient, as well as all of the options that are available to public patients. The private options are either a private midwife, or a private obstetrician.

Private midwife
To receive care from a private midwife and obtain Medicare benefits, your midwife will need to be an “eligible midwife” (meet an additional registration standard) and work with an obstetrician or a doctor who provides obstetric services. Some private midwives are able to provide labour and birth care in hospital settings, while others are only able to provide labour and birth care at home. All private midwives can provide pregnancy and postnatal care. Hospital options may include private or public hospitals; it’s best to ask your midwife which hospitals she attends births at. Eligible midwives provide complete continuity of care: the midwife you book with will be the same midwife who provides all of your pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

Private obstetrician
Private obstetricians provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care, although birth care would also be provided by hospital midwives who may be unknown to you until birth. Private obstetricians deliver babies at public and private hospitals. Continuity is provided during the pregnancy, but birth care is mostly provided by hospital midwives. Postnatal care is almost always provided by hospital midwives, with your obstetrician visiting you each day in hospital and at 6 weeks.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

First-time mums learn the hard way: informed mums choose private midwives

A recent article has suggested that first-time mums have overly unrealistic ideas about their birth – that it will be a natural, uncomplicated birth, when in reality it is not, for the majority. We know that women choosing care through the general hospital system will experience high rates of interventions, leading ultimately to a caesarean. But few women know that if they engage a private midwife for a hospital or homebirth, they will experience much lower rates of intervention, but with the same level of safety. Care with an eligible private midwife will attract medicare benefits, and obstetric care is readily available if it is needed. The article below described one woman’s experience of general hospital care. I can only assume that this reporter has written the article in response to the outcry about the original research.

HERVEY Bay first-time mum Jasmine Adame has experienced first-hand just how difficult childbirth can be.

And she agrees with new research … that suggests that many first-time mums are unprepared for the realities of a complicated labour.

Jasmine delivered her little girl … at Hervey Bay Hospital after spending a day and a half in labour.

In the end, she was told her labour had stalled and she had to have an emergency caesarean.

We are not told how long labour stalled for, whether she had her own midwife with her throughout her labour (unlikely since this is not available to most women through the general hospital system) and we are also not told how far through her labour she was. It is true that some caesareans are performed for “failure to progress” when the woman’s cervix is less than 3 centimeters dilated, indicating that she is not yet in established labour.

Jasmine had attended antenatal classes prior to having her first child and said it was the midwives who held these classes who gave her the best idea of what labour was actually going to be like.

Hospital classes are great at telling women about hospital policies, but independent childbirth education will inspire women with confidence about what their bodies are capable of, with the right support.

“I knew it wasn’t going to be fun.

“But I didn’t expect it to be as horrid as it was,” she said.

It sounds like she didn’t have the care of a midwife who was known and trusted. Most women I work with will experience their labour extremely positively, as if it was the best (hardest and most challenging, but oh so rewarding) experience of their life.

… The chances of having a medically uncomplicated birth were actually 21%.

This applies to women birthing in the general hospital system, where they will not be cared for by one midwife who is known to them, chosen by them and trusted by them. The chance of a medically uncomplicated birth when a woman chooses private midwifery care is around 70% – 80%. This is a huge difference.

Because she had been focused on a natural delivery, the decision to deliver the baby by caesarean took Jasmine by surprise – and the time between the decision and the birth was very swift, allowing her little time to adjust …

This is addressed during care with a private midwife, where there is ample time to explore all options and possibilities, so that there are few surprises on the day (or night!). Hour-long appointments allow plenty of time for questions and education. The possibility of a first-time mum “needing” a caesarean in the general hospital system is 25%, or one in four. Given this large minority, we would think that all women going through the hospital system would be thoroughly appraised of this possibility. In my private practice, a mere 3% first-time mums need a caesarean. This is not because we push the boundaries of safety: it is because women who are well supported, well-informed, relaxed and confident about their birth will generally start labour on their own at term, labour normally and birth their babies unassisted by any instruments or operations.

Hopefully Jasmine will choose private midwifery care with her next pregnancy (private midwifery care is available for a planned hospital birth), where she can expect an 80% – 90% chance of a vaginal birth following her caesarean in her first pregnancy. Or will she choose to go back to the general hospital system, where she has a mere 15% chance of a vaginal birth?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Mums turn to Twitter for pregnancy tips

Link

MUMS-TO-BE might soon turn to Facebook and Twitter for the latest medical support, if a health study involving pregnant northern women proves successful.

The two-year study … will gauge how social networking can encourage healthy pregnancies.

The University of Adelaide project will survey what forms of social media have the most influence over mums-to-be.

It will then develop new ways to communicate health advice to them via Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and text messages.

This could include anything from reminding them to take medication or attend appointments, to encouraging them to avoid smoking and drinking alcohol.

… the study would help provide correct lifestyle and dietary information to pregnant women.

… Dr Michael Wilmore hoped the study would lead to healthier babies …

It’s sad that women are being encouraged away from their care providers and towards non-relationship-based care when we know the benefits of continuity of carer. The best outcome is where a woman feels comfortable to ask her midwife or obstetrician all of her questions and feel supported in her care.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

An amazing homebirth story

Isabel is an amazing, strong woman who came to me for pregnancy care. She had planned to move overseas, and as you’ll read, her pregnancy came as a surprise. She planned a homebirth with a midwife overseas – but the story has a twist in it! We went about the pregnancy, preparing thoroughly for an active, natural and drug-free birth. I was thrilled to receive Isabel’s birth story, and she has kindly agreed to share it here.

Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home. Now it is my turn to write the story I have been so looking forward to… I hope I help inspire another mum-to-be to have the great confidence in her own ability and her body’s ability to birth her baby safely and naturally…love Isabel xx

Our beautiful birth story of baby Zachary by Isabel and Jed

It started in mid-April when I noticed an unusual change in my body. I pee-ed my pants when I sneezed. Even though I have a very weak bladder control and recurrent cystitis I had never done that before. I decided to get a urine test and after 4 weak positives I decided the product was defective and I needed to go see a real doctor tomorrow.
Half way through a busy day at work as a Veterinarian, caring for animals, it hit me that I might be pregnant and that we weren’t really ready for this big change in our lives. I broke down and cried. I left work early to go see the doctor. Jed met me at the clinic and we saw the doctor together. The doctor promptly told me, “My Dear, there isn’t such a thing as false positive results. Only false negative are possible. You ARE pregnant!”

I guess at that point both Jed and I had a lot of conflicting feelings. We had only just gotten married less than a month ago. We had a wedding dinner to attend in Malaysia followed by a honeymoon which required us to trek over 4000km up a mountain. At the same time it was such a big surprise and blessing to know that we were able to have a baby. We both set about sorting through our feelings and thoughts for a couple of weeks before letting the rest of the family and friends know about it.

It was a smooth pregnancy and we had amazing help and support from friends and family. We learnt so much from our lovely midwife, Melissa Maimann and our ante natal teacher, Julie Clarke. It was basically life changing. I had known I would have needed to hit the books for this but who would have thought I find so much conflicting information. It was hard making the right choices. It was doubly hard to not have my sisters around which I rely on so much for guidance. Jed was so good and read everything I told him to. I only had to chuck temper tantrums once a month. =)

In the end, I decided I wanted to have a home birth because I dislike being told what to do with regards to my body and I strongly dislike needles. I spent a lot of time visualising what my ideal birth/labour would be like and tried to get the support network I needed to achieve this dream. It wasn’t easy finding medical people to agree so in the end I realised it would probably just be Jed, Alicia and my mom helping me. I prayed to whoever was listening that everything would go smoothly and I that neither Zachary or I would not need medical help.

Fast forward about 9 months to December, my mucus plug came out throughout the day on the 13th with no signs of labour. So we decided to head over to the homeopath for back up help if needed to get the contractions going.
Almost a week later, on the 22nd of December my waters broke at 2am. It was such a surreal feeling as I sneezed and wet the bed. I was surprised at how wet the bed was and decided to stand up and this big gush of clear warm water ran down my legs. I then realised that my waters had broken and that I would be meeting my baby today.
I woke Jed up and told him the news. Since there were no signs of contractions once again I decided to take the homeopathic remedy and we both went back to sleep.

By 4am, I was uncomfortable enough to wake up and walk around. I emptied my bowels multiple times and drank lots of water and ate some fruit. At 5am I woke Jed up and told him to pump up the exercise ball and warm up the heat packs. By 6am, contractions were regular and about 15 minutes apart, Jed started filling up the bath tub. However, there was no hot water because the water heater had been turned off. So off he woke mom up to take over comforting me and went to boil many many pots of water.

I sat on the bathroom floor rocking on the exercise ball and constantly visualising a soft open cervix and my baby descending nicely. I breathed nicely through each contraction remember our Calmbirth classes.
Heat packs placed on the lower back and under the belly helped with the discomfort as well.
The exercise ball was good for sleeping and resting on between contractions. Around 7 o’clock the bath tub was finally ready, got in and felt lots better. Alicia came shortly after and took over from mom. She gave awesome back rubs and was such a grounding energy which was exactly what I needed to get things done. Things went quickly after that.

Jed got into the water around 8am and I knelt down with my arms wrapped around him. Contractions were about 5 minutes apart then and required a lot more attention. I kept reminding myself that each contraction meant one step closer to seeing Zachary. I felt him slowly pressing down on my cervix and my cervix dilating.
Vocalising helped during the contractions. Jed was a great help reminding me to breathe and not hold my breath.
He was like a rock I knew I could rely on. Did a few self vaginal exams and could feel Zachary’s head progressing downwards.
At about 8.20am I realised I was in transition, his head was crowning and I wasn’t fully dilated. Was upset and freaked out but Alicia reminded me to trust in my body. Took a deep breath and focused on opening my cervix up. A few minutes later I was ready to push, Zachary came out head first with a hand. I rested for a few seconds till the next contractions came and looked up at Jed and said “Are you ready? He is coming.” Jed caught Zachary Francis McKenna at 8.38am
We were both ecstatic and sat there admiring for a while. He started crying almost immediately and looked around at all of us.
Stood up and tried to birth placenta but couldn’t so I went back to the room. He started feeding soon after and I was enjoying his skin to skin contact. The doctor arrived soon after he advised us to clamp the cord and get the placenta out.
Jed was frantic and really wanted the placenta out because he was worried about bleeding. I was getting a little annoyed by his constant fussing. We clamped the cord and Jed cut it. The doctor applied gentle traction and got the placenta out. Finally we were left alone for some quiet time.

I would like to thank my lovely husband for supporting me through the pregnancy and birth and agreeing to a home birth and studying so hard.
I would also like to thank Melissa and Julie for their teachings which allowed me to have the confidence to do this, although neither of them endorsed free birthing they were not judgmental.

No amount of thank you can express my gratitude for having Alicia around to show me there were many options and that we need to take charge of our own births.
Many thanks to my Mom and Dad for allowing me to use their house. Last of all, Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Delivering better maternity care

Link

Despite countless inquiries, initiatives and ministerial pledges … maternity care remains one of the NHS’s problem areas …

In recent weeks there have been two significant pieces of evidence published that will help shape practice affecting the UK’s 800,000 births a year. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced new guidelines for the NHS in England and Wales on the circumstances in which mothers-to-be should be able to have a Caesarean-section delivery.

Meanwhile the landmark Birthplace study … sought to clarify the relative risks of having a baby at home, in hospital or in a birth centre run by midwives; the study found all settings carried a low level of risk. Both documents aim to advise maternity teams on how to give mothers and their babies the best possible experience.

… It is no wonder maternity services are under pressure … England has had a 22% increase in births over the past decade …

But the maternity workforce is not just short of midwives, the roundtable heard. Of those 800,000 annual births, 94% of them take place in hospitals where doctors are present along with midwives; the others, at home (2%) and in birth centres (4%), have midwives solely in charge. But the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) believes the 2,186 senior doctors working as consultants in that area of medicine is too few. It wants the NHS to boost numbers to 3,000-3,300.

Mothers-to-be would benefit because every hospital maternity unit would have a consultant on hand 24/7 and less experienced doctors would no longer be in charge overnight and at weekends …

… “the current system of maternity care is unsustainable. You have to reconfigure”. The participant meant that some maternity units should be closed – merged, in effect – so fewer, larger childbirth centres could offer mothers a better service, partly thanks to more specialist staff handling a greater number of deliveries concentrated in the same place.

It makes little sense for large urban areas to have separate maternity units just a few miles apart, a view confirmed for the speaker by seeing that sort of setup on a recent visit to Leeds and nearby towns.

Many health professionals support the concept of reorganisation. And the reconfiguration of neonatal care services in 2003, which led to fewer units dealing with sick babies but offering enhanced care, is a potential model to follow, another participant added. But there is a major obstacle to overcome first: … To close your core maternity service is a death trap as an MP. So that will not happen,” …

… simply creating fewer, but larger, hospital units is not the answer and there needs to be more midwife-led birth centres, either standalone units or situated beside hospitals, in case a mother needs urgent medical attention …

There was also a strong consensus that the huge proportion of births occurring in hospitals, 94%, is too high. While there was support for moving towards an equal split – 33% at home, 33% in birth centres and 33% in hospital – there was also a recognition that politics, entrenched attitudes and the tightest NHS budget in a generation means that will probably remain just an aspiration for the foreseeable future.

… In 2007, Maternity Matters promised women in England a choice of birth place, but the reality is that many still do not get that. One participant working on the NHS frontline said pressure on maternity services was so great in some places that midwives who usually help women to have home births are having to work, instead, on labour wards, thus depriving those seeking a home birth of that supposedly guaranteed right.

Similarly, surveys by the Healthcare Commission and its successor as the NHS regulator for England, the Care Quality Commission, have shown the promise to women of one-to-one care from a midwife during their labour is also not honoured for as many as a quarter of mothers-to-be, who are left alone and find it stressful …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Couple threaten legal action to ensure homebirth service; hospital engages private midwives for homebirth service

Link

Bosses at Whipps Cross University Hospital have decided to reinstate its home births service after a couple threatened legal action.

The cash-strapped hospital in Leytonstone announced earlier this month that it would be impossible to provide midwives to households from December 18 for up to six weeks due to staff shortages.

But now … extra funding has been made available to pay for an independent midwife service for those who were hit by the sudden suspension.

Adam and Michelle Boult … were planning to have a home birth in January and were so outraged by the hospital’s plan to stop the service they called in a barrister, who argued the hospital had a legal responsibility to support them.

Mr Boult, a 32-year-old journalist, said: “While they would probably deny it, to get them to agree to this has taken an extraordinary amount of pressure.

“We were lucky enough to have a very helpful barrister and solicitor who have pushed for the Trust to reconsider its stance, culminating in Whipps Cross receiving a pre-action letter suggesting a judicial review”.

… In a joint statement, Whipps Cross and ONEL said: “[We] are committed to offering all women in the local area the best possible choice of how and where they give birth.

“We have been working together to find a way to offer a home birth service during the next four weeks. Safety is our priority, and we did have some concerns about staffing levels over this period.

“However, by working together, the hospital and NHS ONEL are now able to bring in independent midwives for this limited period, until the hospital’s Home Birth Service team is in place.

“This means those women who asked for a home birth in the next four weeks can have one. We have always been committed to developing the Home Birth Service and to ensuring we provide high quality, safe and consistent services to all women.”

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

I’m pregnant! What are my next steps?

If you have just found out you are pregnant, congratulations! You might be feeling a range of emotions: excited, fearful, overwhelmed, happy, anxious … this is all very normal! Many women who contact me feel unsure about what to do next and are anxious to know all their options before making a choice, so I have put together a few tips to make you feel a little more confident.

Although many women see their GP as their first port of call when they are pregnant, it’s handy to know that women may also see an eligible midwife who can order all the necessary pregnancy tests and any scans that are needed. An eligible midwife can also talk with you about the available options for your pregnancy and birth care, in a relaxed and unhurried setting. An eligible midwife can help you determine your due date and arrange any referrals that you may need. She can book you into a hospital, refer you to an obstetrician if needed, and also provide full pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

How do Midwives Work?

It’s a common question I am asked! When people ask me what I do, I tell them I am a midwife. The next question is usually, “Oh, so you’re a nurse?”. “Not quite”, I reply, “a midwife – I care for women though pregnancy and birth and with their new baby.” Then they really look puzzled. “That’s not what an obstetrician does?” “An obstetrician is a doctor who specialises in caring for women with complicated pregnancies and births. A midwife specialises in caring for women who are having healthy pregnancies and births.” By that stage they’re well and truly confused and I start to wonder what we need to do to promote midwifery as a care option for all women.

The term midwife means ‘with woman’. Midwives work in partnership with women through pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. Midwives can provide care to women from the time that the woman discovers she is pregnant, right up until her baby is 6 weeks old. In fact, women who experience a normal, healthy pregnancy and birth may not see a doctor at all! Eligible midwives are able to order all the necessary tests and scans during pregnancy and may refer directly to an obstetrician if their services are necessary.

Midwives provide education, support, advice and information, as well as doing all the routine checks of mother and baby.

Midwives advocate measures throughout pregnancy and birth that promote normal birth: that is a birth without interventions. Midwives and are experienced in such things as water birth, active birth, and so on.

Midwives are also specially educated to know if anything is out of the ordinary, and they can get help from obstetricians. In pregnancy, midwives see women at intervals so that any issues that may present can be dealt with before they cause any major issues.

Women who are cared for by one midwife from pregnancy through to birth have better outcomes in terms of safety, lower rates of intervention and satisfaction with their experience. Midwives too prefer to work in this way, getting to know each family individually.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Unneeded cesareans are risky and expensive

Link

Cesarean deliveries are over-used … and reducing the number of surgical births would save health-care dollars and protect women’s health. Those are the conclusions of a new white paper issued today by the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative.

… in the last 15 years, the rate of surgical birth has increased from 22 to 32 percent of California deliveries with no measurable benefits for new mothers or their babies.

This is a concern because cesareans aren’t risk-free. After surgical delivery, women experience more pain, infection and hemorrhage than women who give birth vaginally. Women who have had a prior cesarean also have more problems with subsequent pregnancies. The placenta can become deeply implanted in scar tissue from the old incision, causing hemorrhage at the second delivery …

The white paper, which was funded by the California HealthCare Foundation, uncovered striking evidence for over-use of cesarean: Among low-risk women having their first baby, the rate of the surgery varies from nine percent to 51 percent of births based on the mother’s geographic location within California. As a press release about the paper says:

This large variation among California regions and hospitals cannot be explained by medical factors alone and therefore suggests that labor management practices and local attitudes help drive the use of cesareans during labor.

Reasons for the increase also include: physicians’ concerns about medical liability and avoidance of risk, as well as specific labor practices such as the increased reliance on labor induction, early labor admission, lack of patience in labor, and the virtual disappearance of vaginal birth after a prior cesarean …

“Over the last 15 years, cesarean deliveries have become so common that in some hospitals and communities they are considered ‘normal births’ despite the increased risks,” …

The white paper makes several recommendations for how to reduce unnecessary cesareans, including removing perverse financial incentives … encouraging VBACs … improving public education about the risks of cesarean delivery, and implementing statewide quality-improvement activities for better labor practices.

Unfortunately, there is no mention of the role of the midwife in preventing the first caesarean, or in helping a VBAC woman have a successful VBAC.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

NICE caesarean guidelines

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence in the UK has released new guidelines that give women the right to request a caesarean under their public health care system, the NHS. These new guidelines have been quite controversial.

Link

LIVERPOOL’S top midwife last night welcomed new guidance to give pregnant women the choice of having a Caesarean.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) said the option should be given to women who are genuinely fearful of childbirth or have had difficult births previously.

But the authority said it was not recommending offering the procedure for all mothers-to-be.

… “If a woman has had a really traumatic time with a previous birth and cannot face the risk of a similar experience, we would agree to her opting for an elective Caesarean.

“Also, we work with women who actually suffer from what is a recognised phobia around childbirth.

… Some pregnant women say they have had to fight to get a Caesarean on the NHS when they feel they have a genuine reason to justify one. It is hoped the guidelines will prevent this and make the situation across England fairer.

NICE says the number of Caesareans could actually decrease, because of counselling measures brought in to explain the risks and also the likelihood of a natural birth being safe.

… “If a woman just said it was what she wanted for no good reason, we would spend some time with her and support her to make the right decision. “The recovery from a natural birth is much quicker.

… Very, very few women opt for a Caesarean unless they need one for themselves or to safeguard the baby.”

… “This guideline is not about offering free Caesareans for all on the NHS; it is about ensuring that women give birth in the way that is most appropriate for them and their babies.

“For a very small number of women, their anxiety about childbirth will lead them to ask for a CS.

“The new recommendations in this guideline mean that these fears will be taken seriously and women will be offered mental health support if they need it.

“If the woman’s anxiety is not allayed by this support, then she should be offered a planned CS.”…

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Simulator to predict chance of caesarean?

Link

Traditionally, doctors and midwives have used a technique called pelvimetry to measure the pelvis and try to determine its adequacy for giving birth. But pelvic size is just one factor in how smoothly labor will go, rendering the method largely insufficient.

Scientists in France have been working to take some of the guesswork out of labor predictions … their newly developed software, called Predibirth, predicts birth outcomes quite accurately.

The researchers used their software to process magnetic resonance images of 24 pregnant women, capturing the pelvis and fetus, and then simulating 72 possible trajectories the baby’s head might take through the birth canal. The program then uses this data to score the mother’s chances of having a normal (vaginal) birth.

… Of the 24 women in the study, the 13 who delivered normally all had highly favorable birth outcome scores. Three women who had high-risk scores underwent elective C-sections. Of the five women who underwent emergency C-section, the three with obstructed labor had high-risk scores, and the two who experienced heart rhythm abnormalities had mildly favorable or favorable scores.

More accurate measurements of labor risks might not only keep C-section rates lower and help identify necessary C-sections before they become emergencies, but these measurements could also better inform those who want to deliver at home whether it is safe to do so.

I wonder if all of those women had undergone extensive preparation for birth and had sought continuity of midwifery care? Of 24 women, only 13 delivered vaginally. That is only 54%! Private midwifery care generally had rates of normal birth up around 90%.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Hospital births for healthy women? What does the research say?

The recent Birthplace Study was the first of its kind to compare outcomes for low-risk, healthy women who gave birth in midwife-led units (both alongside and freestanding), obstetric units and at home. My previous blog post described the findings for first-time Mums birthing at home, but what did the findings say about hospital birth?

The study is extremely positive and shows that birth is generally very safe for mothers and babies who are low risk and healthy. In fact, the chance of something going very wrong for the baby was so low that the researchers had to combine mortality and morbidity to get any meaningful data. There were so few deaths in the study (38 out of nearly 65,000 births) that they had to combine a host of adverse outcomes in order to come up with any statistically significant results. Therefore the “primary outcome” included baby deaths and serious morbidity (injury / illness) to the baby. Overall, a low risk woman had a 4.3/1,000 risk of having a “primary outcome” (that is, death or serious injury to the baby). For women birthing in hospital, the figure was 4.4/1,000 and was actually lower for babies born at home and in midwifery-led units. Imagine that: the risk to the baby overall was highest in hospital!

Breaking this down further, if we look at first-time Mums separately to second and subsequent time Mums, the figures look different. First time Mums had a 5.3/1,000 chance of a “primary outcome” overall. This rose to 9.3/1,000 for women who planned to birth at home, and fell to 4.5 for women birthing in a midwifery-led unit. It was 5.3/1,000 for first-time mums who birthed in hospital. Again, we see that hospital birth confers some increased risk for first time Mums.

Now looking at women birthing for the second (or subsequent) time, we find that the overall risk of a “primary outcome” was very low: 3.1/1,000. This was higher in an obstetric (hospital) unit at 3.3/1,000, lower in a midwifery-led unit (2.7/1,000) and lowest for women birthing at home (2.3/1,000). So once again, the study is showing that hospital is not the safest place to birth a baby if you are a low-risk, healthy women.

If you are having your first baby and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is in a midwifery unit, and if you have birthed before and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is at home.

Of course, midwifery units have limited capabilities to provide higher levels of care, and as labour and birth are unpredictable, there needs to be robust transfer arrangements in place. Some 10-45% of women transfer in birth. This figure is lowest for women who have birthed before, and highest in first-time Mums. As well as robust transfer arrangements, women – particularly first-time Mums – need to be aware of the chance of transfer and to be comfortable with this possibility. This is best accommodated if the woman can transfer in with her own midwife.

What were the intervention rates like?

Not surprisingly, intervention rates were highest in women who planned a hospital birth. 93% women who planned a homebirth had a normal birth, versus only 74% women in the hospital. 11% had a caesarean in the obstetric (hospital) unit, versus a mere 2.8% in women who planned a home birth. 24% women had their labours sped up with a syntocinon drip in the planned hospital birth group, versus only 5% in the women who planned a homebirth. 31% women had an epidural in the planned hospital birth group, versus 8% at home. And of course, episiotomy rates were lowest at home.

It is clear that being in hospital greatly increases risks for all low risk mothers compared to being at home or in a midwife led unit (either alongside or freestanding).

It is clear that low-risk women have much to gain by planning a birth with midwives in a birth centre or some other form of midwifery-led care. Planned homebirth does increase the risks to the babies of first-time Mums, with an increase in adverse outcomes for babies from about 0.5% to just under 1%. But what is it about planning a homebirth that increases the risk to the baby? The study used intention to treat analysis, so we are not able to know how many of those adverse outcomes occurred in those who transferred to hospital after a planned homebirth, versus those that happened in the births that actually occurred at home. We do know that the outcomes of homebirth transfers are generally worse than those who had been planned to occur in hospital, and first-time Mums are more likely to transfer. We also know that birth is generally riskier for a first-time Mum than a woman who has birthed before.

Regardless, the study is extremely positive in supporting the role of primary midwifery care and the excellent outcomes that low-risk women can achieve when they choose a midwife as their care provider. Imagine the benefits as well for high-risk women who receive midwifery care with appropriate and timely obstetric care.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Homebirth for first-time Mums: what does the research say?

Link

…Homebirth carries a higher risk for the babies of first-time mothers, according to a landmark study published in the British Medical Journal.

However, the chance of harm to the baby is still under 1% …

For a second birth there was no difference in the risk to babies between home, a midwife-led unit or a doctor-led hospital unit.

Midwife-led care was in general much more likely to lead to a natural birth.

The Birthplace study is the largest carried out into the safety of different maternity settings – comparing births at home, in midwife-led units attached to hospitals, those that are stand-alone and doctor-led hospital units.

All the women followed had healthy pregnancies and began labour with no known risk factors.

It found that, overall, birth is very safe wherever it happens.

The rates of complications, including stillbirth or other problems affecting the baby, was 5.3 per 1,000 births in hospital compared with 9.3 per 1,000 home births (for women having their first baby).

Rate of complications for first-borns per 1,000

Stand-alone midwife unit – 4.5
Hospital midwife unit – 4.7
Hospital – 5.3
Home – 9.3

… About 45% of women planning to have their first baby at home were transferred during labour, although this was mainly because of delays in giving birth and the need for an epidural pain-relief injection, rather than because the baby was in distress.

Rates of normal birth

60% hospital obstetric unit
76% hospital midwife unit
83% freestanding midwife unit
90% home

The transfer itself was not thought to be responsible for the difference because there was no raised risk for women moved from stand-alone midwife units to hospital during labour.

There was no difference in risk when women were having their second baby, whether that was at home, in a midwife unit or a traditional hospital setting.

The rate of transfer from home to hospital was much lower too, at just 12% (for women having their second and subsequent babies).

… [This study] reveals an unexplained difference in the rate of normal birth between units run by midwives and those run by doctors. The disparity on emergency Caesarean sections is particularly striking. It suggests a different culture in the way midwives and doctors see birth, with doctors concerned about risks and midwives focused on normality.

… this research should drive an an expansion in midwife-led care, either at birth centres or at home for the half of women expected to have a low-risk birth.

… The research also confirms that midwife-led care is much more likely to lead to a normal birth – without any interventions, including forceps or ventouse.

That was true whether the baby was born at home or in a midwife-led unit.

The emergency Caesarean rate for the low-risk women in the study was 11% in doctor-led units compared with only 2.8% at home, and 4.4% in a midwife led unit on a hospital site.

… “Where a woman needs an emergency Caesarean section for their first birth, they will not be regarded as low risk for the next birth, and won’t have the choice of going outside a medically-led unit.”

The Key Findings of the study:

Giving birth is generally very safe

For ‘low risk’ women, the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes (intrapartum stillbirth, early neonatal death, neonatal encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome, and specified birth related injuries including brachial plexus injury) was low (4.3 events per 1000 births).

Midwifery units appear to be safe for the baby and offer benefits for the mother

… there were no significant difference in adverse perinatal outcomes compared with planned birth in an obstetric unit.

Women who planned birth in a midwifery unit … had significantly fewer interventions, including substantially fewer intrapartum caesarean sections, and more ‘normal births’ than women who planned birth in an obstetric unit.

For women having a second or subsequent baby, home births and midwifery unit births appear to be safe for the baby and offer benefits for the mother

For multiparous women, there were no significant differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between planned home births or midwifery unit births and planned births in obstetric units.

For multiparous women, birth in a non-obstetric unit setting significantly and substantially reduced the odds of having an intrapartum caesarean section, instrumental delivery or episiotomy.

For women having a first baby, a planned home birth increases the risk for the baby

For nulliparous women, there were 9.3 adverse perinatal outcome events per 1000 planned home births compared with 5.3 per 1000 births for births planned in obstetric units, and this finding was statistically significant.

For women having a first baby, there is a fairly high probability of transferring to an obstetric unit during labour or immediately after the birth

For nulliparous women, the peri-partum transfer rate was 45% for planned home births, 36% for planned FMU births and 40% for planned AMU births

For women having a second or subsequent baby, the transfer rate is around 10%

For women having a second or subsequent baby, the proportion of women transferred to an obstetric unit during labour or immediately after the birth was 12% for planned home births, 9% for planned FMU births and 13% for planned AMU births.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Delayed Cord Clamping

Link

Delayed cord clamping refers to the practice of clamping the umbilical cord after it has stopped pulsating. The usual hospital practice is to clamp and cut the cord straight away, however new wisdom (practiced for many years by private midwives) challenged the usual practice.

Soon after a baby is born, the umbilical cord is clamped. But just how long those minutes should be, in between birth and clamping, is the subject of some controversy.

New research from Sweden shows that a delay in clamping the cord, by just a few minutes, results in improved iron levels for babies … iron is crucial for healthy development of the brain and central nervous system.

… For the babies whose clamping was delayed, there were fewer instances of anemia two days after birth. By four months of age they showed a 45 percent higher mean ferritin concentration … and a lower prevalence of iron deficiency than the babies who had been clamped early.

In the early clamping group, researchers noted that the degree of iron deficiency was moderate, rather than mild. All infants, from both groups, had similar weights and lengths as well as similar levels of hemoglobin.

Delayed cord clamping permits additional blood, including iron, to reach the neonate. The controversy comes in, however, because … later clamping can have a potential for … maternal hemorrhage …

In the event of excessive bleeding, the cord could be clamped and cut and Syntocinon administered to stem the bleeding. Delayed cord clamping is my usual practice. I do not generally cut or clamp the cord until after the placenta has been born.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Expecting mothers prefer midwife-led labour

Link

Most women should be offered midwife-led care that uses fewer interventions and is just as safe as the consultant-led model, a major study recommends.

The study, commissioned by the Health Service Executive and conducted by the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Trinity College Dublin, found most women prefer midwife-led units.

It also discovered the number of babies requiring resuscitation at birth or admission to the special care baby unit was the same for both groups of women.

Almost six in 10 women in the consultant-led units (57%) had their labours speeded up by either having their waters broken or having oxytocin given intravenously by a drip, compared to only four in 10 women in the midwife-led units.

The study involved 1,653 women who had babies in the HSE Dublin North-East region from 2004 to 2007 and compared the consultant-led maternity care with a new model of care provided in two integrated midwifery-led units in Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda and Cavan General Hospital.

The two midwife-led units, which have hotel-like private rooms with birthing pools, were opened in response to recommendations made in the Minder Report in 2001 to provide more choice in maternity care in the north-east.

… fewer women in the midwifery-led unit group chose pain-relieving epidurals in labour.

Despite having fewer epidurals, 83% of women in the midwife-led units were satisfied with their pain relief compared with 68% of women in the consultant-led unit.

“When women are supported by one-to-one midwifery care, are encouraged to labour gently at their own pace and have the pain-relieving benefits of relaxing in warm water, they are far better able to tolerate pain and labour more effectively,” …

The study found that 85% of women attending the midwife-led unit would recommend the care they had received to a friend, compared to 70% having the usual care.

Although facilities in the midwifery-led units were quite luxurious, the cost of care for each women was €332.80 less than in the usual hospital system.

A recent KPMG report on maternity care in the greater Dublin region also recommended the introduction of midwifery-led units throughout the country.

These results have been found in other studies, particularly the claim around pain relief. It is interesting that epidurals don’t equate with a more positive birth experience; rather, a woman who feels well-prepared and who is supported with one-to-one midwifery care in a drug-free birth, will rate her birth as being highly satisfying.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Doctors claim homebirth risks ignored

Link

WA doctors have attacked a new policy for State Government-funded homebirths, saying it sidesteps serious concerns about the increased risk of newborn deaths.

The draft document says women have a right to choose a home delivery at taxpayers’ expense provided they are at low risk of complications and give their consent.

But women with risk factors such as a previous caesarean, obesity or a history of blood loss in childbirth should be excluded from publicly funded homebirths.

… Australian Medical Association WA said the policy fudged serious concerns raised by former members of the committee, who found the risk of death in babies born at home was almost four times higher and called for funded homebirth to be banned.

“Not only is the taxpayer entitled to think public monies are going to things that are evidence-based, if the evidence suggests it’s more dangerous they should have even greater concerns.” …

The WA homebirth policy is a very considered and thorough document that supports low-risk homebirth for women who are attended by experienced midwives with a back-up hospital booking and obstetric consultation. Unfortunately the doctors quoted in the above article seem to have mixed their research. Studies clearly demonstrate that low-risk homebirth is at least as safe as hospital birth, and with fewer interventions for mothers in labour. It is high risk homebirth that is associated with excess perinatal mortality and this is not supported under the WA policy, or any other publicly-funded homebirth programs.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Turbulent times

A lot has been happening in the world of homebirth and midwifery. Many will have read the articles about homebirth, freebirth, midwives and maternity care that are appearing in our papers on a daily basis.

I have not posted for a couple of weeks now, for three main reasons: one I have been really busy with my practice which has not been this busy for about two years. Second, I attended the Australian College of Midwives National Conference – the ACM worked really hard to deliver an excellent conference that was appreciated by all. I had the fantastic opportunity to meet midwives from around Australia and share ideas, discuss practice and talk birthy things. I was pleased that the conference was in Sydney, because as those of you who know me will know, in my non-midwifery life I rescue and care for injured and orphaned native birds, and so I was able to make a trip home most days of the conference to feed everyone at home. They were hungry but they all survived! I digress. The third reason for not posting was that the recent issues have made me re-assess things like responsibility, accountability, safety, choice, control, autonomy, beneficence, informed decision-making and many other issues. I have no answers to report. Just lots of reflection.

Midwifery and maternity care are going through turbulent times and as professionals and organisations, I feel that we have done a major disservice to women that they feel safer birthing at home – with or without a registered midwife – in the presence of risk factors – because they so strongly believe that the hospital system will not enable them to birth in the manner of their choosing. It is a sad reflection on the health system and the professionals who work within it. Women who cannot access midwifery care because they are planning a VBAC. Women who are told that if they insist on birthing vaginally with twins, they must accept continuous monitoring, induction, epidural and birth in stirrups for twin two. Women whose only option is to birth in a hospital that is two hours from their home. We have all heard the stories.

My biggest disappointment is the lack of midwife admitting rights. We are one year into the maternity reforms on November 1 this year. We have eligible midwives with Medicare provider numbers, ordering tests and working with doctors to provide safe care to women and babies – yet we cannot access hospitals to provide this care. I well understand that there are a lot of hurdles to be overcome with midwife admitting rights, and life has taught me that nothing in life is impossible.

The release of the homebirth position statement – which I fully support as an evidence-based and safe way to provide care – combined with the lack of midwife admitting rights, is disastrous for women and midwives. Higher risk women are forced into a position of birthing in hospital without their midwife if the midwife complies with the position statement but has no admitting rights – otr else freebirthing, potentially with disastrous consequences. Overnight, this change occurred and women are fuming.

It is impossible to believe, but an eligible midwife who crosses all the “T”s and dots all the “I”s will suffer incredibly in terms of restriction of clientele, however if she were to remove her name from the register – something that I understand is very easy to do – she may do just as she pleases with no accountability, regulation or practice standards. Midwives are placed in the untenable situation of a dwindling practice, or unregistering and having a flourishing practice. Until admitting rights are in place, midwives will have no place to birth with their higher-risk clients. This situation does not see the Government supporting midwives or women. It is creating a disaster.

The various politics of homebirth and midwifery has created an enormous rift between midwives. It seems that there are the bunch who have elected to become eligible, forge ahead with collaborative arrangements, push for admitting rights and accept the increased regulation that is upon us as our profession matures. The other group opposes the increased regulation and restriction of choice, supports midwife- (or non-midwife)-attended homebirth for any woman who wants it and really wants things to just go back to how they used to be, before insurance became mandatory. Many midwives sit comfortable in the middle of this debate. It is sad to watch such division and animosity amongst midwives. We seem to lack a capacity of saying, “We don’t share each other’s vision and we have made different choices, but we are midwives and we will support each other”. As one midwife said to me, “We are each doing the best we can for the women we care for and we’re making the best of a rotten situation”.

I know 2012 will be better than 2011. Who knows? Maybe it’ll be an historic year where for the very first time, women will birth on their own terms, with their chosen midwife, at home or in hospital. I wonder how many women will insist on homebirth in spite of significant risks, if they are able to birth in hospital with their own midwife and in the manner of their choosing.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

How is a hospital midwife different to a private midwife?

This is a question I’m asked quite frequently so I’d like to take this opportunity to explain the difference.

Hospital midwives are employed by a hospital, either public or private. The majority of hospital midwives work shifts and there are generally 3 shifts in a day, so that each woman will go through 3 different midwives each day, in the provision of her care. Many hospital midwives do not work across the full scope of midwifery practice; instead, they work in one area only, such as postnatal. Because of this, it is unlikely that women would be afforded the opportunity to meet with the midwives who’ll be providing their care in labour and after their baby is born, first because the midwives work in shifts and it’s impossible to know who’ll be rostered on on the big day, and second because the midwives in postnatal, for example, would not work in the antenatal clinics which is where women go for their pregnancy care. The other implication is that antenatal midwives – who do not work with breastfeeding mothers – are not best placed to provide breastfeeding preparation and advice in pregnancy; likewise, delivery suite midwives would also not be best placed to advise about early pregnancy tests.

Another important factor is that hospital-employed midwives are bound by hospital policies. It’s a condition of employment. So that when something props up and the woman wants impartial information or alternative suggestions to explore, the hospital-employed midwife is not able to provide this.

Private midwives run their own business and are self-employed. They book their own clients and arrange their work life and hours to meet the needs of their clients. They follow their clients through from pregnancy, birth and afterwards with their new baby, generally for 6 weeks. Private midwives do not work in shifts; we are on call 24/7 for the families in our care. This means that the same midwife is accessible at all times, either by phone or in person.

Families choose their private midwife, whereas there’s no option to choose hospital midwives: you have whoever is rostered on when you’re there. Choice is an important factor of maternity care, and is a driving factor in the success of private obstetric practices where women can interview several obstetricians before choosing the one that best meets their needs.

Private midwives are not bound by hospital policies. We do follow the guidelines of our professional bodies such as the Australian College of Midwives, as well as researched and widely-accepted clinical practice guidelines, as well as legal requirements, but when it comes to exploring all options, private midwifery is the way to go. A common example might be a breech baby. Hospital policy may be to offer to turn the baby manually (ECV) so that it is head down. If this is not successful, caesarean will be encouraged. These options are also given by private midwives, as well as the natural alternatives to turning breech babies, and if the baby decides to remain breech, there is the option of vaginal breech birth and the woman will be able to approach this knowing that she has a skilled professional by her side, on her side.

Women will generally approach private midwives for the one-to-one flexible care that we provide; they want to get to know the midwife who’ll be there on the special day (or night) when their new family member arrives. It’s only natural to want to know that person who’ll be with you during the most life-changing, amazing and special moments of your life.

Generally, satisfaction with private midwifery care is very high, whether the woman birthed at home or in hospital.

Women are generally very satisfied with their care because they have far more control over what does and does not happen to them. Women have greater access to resources that helps them to feel confident with their abilities to birth naturally and fully aware of all options so that they can choose the best one for their needs.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Responsibility in birth: Who owns it?

Who is really responsible for intervention that happens in our births? Is it us or our health professionals? Or is it both?

In this blog post, I’m referring to situations where unnecessary intervention has taken place. Of course there’s a place for intervention in some labours and this post does not address interventions that are truly necessary. However that’s defined!

Some women argue that birth – and what happens in birth – is their responsibility and they take charge of all decisions and also take responsibility for the outcome of those decisions – good or bad. Women in this category would never dream of blaming their care provider for a bad outcome because the decision was theirs alone and they made a fully informed decision that they were comfortable with. When things go well, they attribute that great outcome to their good preparation and decision making.

Other women will outsource decision making to a health professional such as a midwife or a doctor. “They’re the experts”. In life, we outsource all sorts of decisions, so it’s not surprising that women may choose to do this for pregnancy and birth.

When things go according to plan – a woman has the birth she was hoping for, the baby is healthy, breastfeeding goes really well – there’s no issue at all. When things don’t go as planned, issues of responsibility (and sometimes blame) come up.

Over the years, I’ve sat back and observed women’s reactions when things don’t go well.

I think there are two parts to things not going well. One is the woman’s responsibility for her decisions and the other is the health professional’s conduct.

I’ve observed that when things don’t go to plan, very few women take responsibility for the choices they made that might have led them down a path that they never planned to walk. Eg women who might really want a natural birth who choose a hospital with a very high caesarean, episiotomy, epidural and induction rate. “It won’t happen to me” and then it does.

Some go right back to the same care provider and place of birth – it’s what they know and what they’re comfortable with – even though the outcome is not what they really want. Should they complain about their [caesarean / epidural / induction / forceps / episiotomy] and say they’re not responsible: their care provider is? I think not – choosing the right care provider and place of birth is each woman’s responsibility. If the hospital / health professional has a 50% caesarean rate – yep, that applies to you too.

Some people argue that women can never take full responsibility for their births because the information that’s relevant to them is hidden, disguised, not available until it’s too late and so on. In these cases, some argue that the woman could not have possibly got the information that would have assisted them to make a choice for their birth that is more aligned to what they’re trying to achieve. But if this is the case, how do we account for women who do magically find information, make decisions that are compatible with their needs, and experience the birth they had wanted? What sets these women apart from other women? Determination? A strong sense of self-efficacy? Confidence? Having options?

Information is all around us. We can talk to care providers, hospital midwives, friends / family, google relevant articles and information, talk to private midwives and obstetricians and so on … there’s lots of information out there, even in rural / remote areas, thanks to the WWW. In NSW, hospital statistics are publicly available. Is there any excuse for not knowing your hospital’s caesarean rate if you live in NSW?

When we buy a car, we know we have many choices. Not just the make of the car, also auto / manual, number of doors, convenience features, comfort features, safety features and so on. If we only go to Toyota and buy a car that’s not suited to our needs – and this becomes apparent a couple of weeks later – is this Toyota’s fault? Maybe, but only if Toyota falsely advertised the car’s features, because we’re responsible for the choices we make. Likewise, if we choose hospital X without exploring other hospitals, or settle on Dr Y or Midwife Z without interviewing others who might be better suited to our needs – is it the doctor’s / hospital’s / midwife’s fault if the birth has more intervention than the woman had hoped for?

In all industries, it is the responsibility of the consumer to first work out what they want, and next to set about finding a service / product that meets their needs. Is birth any different? It is true that we cannot control birth, but if we want a drug-free birth and we know from the outset that our care provider only attends epiduralised births, is this a compatible choice?

Now, the other side of this whole argument is the issue of conduct. While I firmly believe – and know – that information is out there, freely available, and that women are most definitely responsible for choosing the right care provider and place of birth for their needs, I also appreciate that health professionals are responsible for their conduct.

Negligence says that a health professional owes a duty of care to the patient, the duty of care is breached, the patient suffered harm, and the harm is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the breach of duty of care.

If this happens, then of course the health professional is to blame and the patient ought to raise this as an issue so that it can be addressed either legally or within the profession. Drug errors, incorrect surgical technique, performing the wrong operation, failing to gain consent, working while under the influence of drugs or alcohol – these are all serious issues that ought to be reported.

So, in summing up, I think that responsibility for birth is a complex issue. While women are most certainly responsible for choosing the right care provider and place of birth (amongst other decisions), health professionals are responsible for how they practice their profession.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Decision-making: Heart and Head

Through my practice, I have a lot of women coming to me who are experiencing conflict with regards to the choices they have made for their pregnancy and birth. Typically, they find (sometimes quite late in their pregnancy) that perhaps the choice they made right back at the start of their pregnancy, no longer works for the, or the choice that they made was perhaps not as well informed as they thought it was. Some women find it hard to take the attitude of interviewing potential care providers before pregnancy (or very early in pregnancy) and then choosing the midwife or obstetrician who is best able to meet their needs. The end result can often be a woman who chooses an obstetrician with the goal of a natural birth, only to discover that their doctor will only “deliver” their baby if they’re on their back in bed with an epidural in place. Or that induction is performed by 40 weeks, or that all women have their waters broken and all first time Mums have an episiotomy or so on. And sometimes, the more reading a woman does, the more she realises that this is not what she wants.

I often ask the question, “What was it that made you decide on this particular care provider?”

And the responses are generally very interesting.

• My GP referred me
• My mother / sister / friend / neighbour used this midwife and she said she’s wonderful
• Well, when I got pregnant I went to my GP. She asked me if I have private health insurance and I said yes, so she wrote a referral to Dr XX.

I ask these women if they considered any other options. “What options?” comes the response.

I’m amazed that with the marvels of modern technology, internet etc, women don’t know they have other options. We have options with all sorts of things in life, and we don’t shy away from discovering them either! It seems to be to be an interesting handing-over of responsibility when it comes to pregnancy and birth, and I’m curious why it happens with pregnancy and birth, but not in other aspects of life. Do we buy a particular computer – that can’t meet our needs – because it was recommended and we didn’t know there were other computers on the market? Do we buy a large house when we need a small house because it was recommended by the real estate agent?

In most other situations where choices are involved, people will engage in a process of assessing options.

We might list all the possible options and then assess each option across a range of qualities.

We ask questions.

We consider what it is that we really want, and then match it to what’s available, seeking the most compatible choice.

But sadly, this does not happen with pregnancy and birth. Perhaps it should?

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Natural birth in hospital?

Here are some ideas to birth naturally in hospital:

Read, read, read. Books, websites, any written info from your care provider … read it all. You also need to know the difference between facts presented to you in an honest and unbiased way, and facts that are being filtered through hospital policy. This is where women benefit from having a private midwife by their side.

For example, “Some risks rise slightly when a woman has high blood pressure. I am uncomfortable with letting your pregnancy continue with high blood pressure because of the risks to the baby and to you if something happens” is an honest and factual statement. You have the right to accept the risks and refuse induction. However, some women hear “I’m going to induce you today because if we don’t do this now, there is a good chance your baby will not make it”. This statement is dishonest, using a woman’s fears and her maternal instinct to encourage her to accept intervention. There is also no discussion of alternative options. Informed consent requires that women are presented with options so that they can make the best decision for them, in their situation.

Be assertive As with most human relationships, a great deal can be resolved with a calm, respectful and firm manner. Know what you want and why you want it. Engage a private midwife to assist you with obtaining relevant and impartial information.

Listen. If you are choosing to use a hospital and an obstetrician for your birth, then you acknowledge that their presence, education and experience have some value. Your wishes are important but be willing to listen even when what’s being said is really not what you want to hear. You must also acknowledge that an obstetrician is trained in all things that go wrong, and they are on the look-out for any sign of things going wrong. Midwives, on the other hand, will promote normalcy and assist your pregnancy and birth to remain normal. These differing philosophies do result in big differences in intervention rates.

Be Flexible. Understand that sometimes things don’t go the way we had planned. There might be some occasions where you’ll be happy to accommodate the hospital policy, and other times when you’ll want to stand your ground.

Ultimately, it is true that the most important aspect of birth is safety and a healthy mother and baby. But that doesn’t mean the other aspects are unimportant, and I firmly believe you can have a great birth – and a safe birth – in any location.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Push to get new babies home in four hours

Link

HOSPITAL to home in four hours? It would have been unheard of a generation ago when new mothers regularly spent up to two weeks in hospital, ”lying in” post-birth.

But in the NSW maternity wards of the future, it won’t be unusual for women to give birth in the morning and go home in time for lunch.

Early hospital discharge for women with low-risk pregnancies, uncomplicated vaginal births, a healthy baby and good support at home, is part of NSW Health’s Towards Normal Birth directive, to be implemented by 2015.

Women who opt to go home early would be visited by a midwife for up to two weeks after the birth …

… there was no reason why more women could not leave hospital soon after giving birth, particularly when they were under the care of the same midwife throughout.

… if women could be well cared for at home, it would alleviate pressure on maternity staff.

… ”I don’t really like hospitals and my feeling is that if you’re not sick there is no need to be in one,” she said. ”I wanted to go home as early as possible if I was healthy and the baby was healthy. I would rather be in my own home, in my own bed.”

… NSW president of the Australian Breastfeeding Association, had concerns about early discharge programs. She said the state was over-represented in calls to the association’s helpline, which she suspected was due to women leaving hospital before feeding was well established …

Early discharge hospital programs typically delivery one to three home visits per woman. Although the woman may be under the care of the hospital for up to two weeks, on some of those days, the woman will be called instead of visited and on other days, there is no phone call or a visit, but the woman is always able to call in if she has any issues and a midwife is always available for help over the phone. Private midwives provide a wide ranging schedule of postnatal visits, ranging from one or two visits only, to as many as 12 postnatal visits over a 6-week period. Most private midwives will provide postnatal are for 6 weeks. It is best to ask your private midwife for her schedule of postnatal visiting before you engage her services and to always ask if you feel that you would like more visits.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Preparing for a Natural Birth

In society today, there is a great focus on pain in labour birth, with the assumption that women cannot handle the pain of labour and that women need medical assistance in the form of an epidural or drugs to get through. Many women go to hospital saying, “well, I’d like a natural birth, but I’ll go with the flow”.

Even with today’s technology, birth comes with pain most of the time. Even for those women who are sure they want an epidural, they will still feel some pain as epidurals are given once labour is established, after 4cm dilation. There is usually pain / discomfort to get to that point.

And once women get to 4cm, the last 6 are usually much faster and easier to get through. That’s because our bodies are designed to release natural pain relief that helps with the later stages of labour.

The best thing is to learn techniques for managing the sensations of labour, to feel well prepared for labour and birth.

When preparing for a natural birth, most women feel better informed – and therefore relaxed – if they have read a lot about labour and birth. Women who are well-informed about the process of birth, the options available to them and what they can expect, are generally more accepting of the sensations of labour. They are not fearful because they know what to expect and what might happen next.

It’s a great idea to read other women’s birth stories – positive and negative – to give a balanced view of what happens, what is possible and what you might like for your own labour.

Independent childbirth education is excellent for teaching women in an unbiased way about all the options available to them.

Calmbirth is another fantastic tool for assisting with natural birth.

It’s essential to be surrounded with positive messages about birth. Try to limit contact with people who are skeptical and judgmental of your plans for a natural birth. Don’t let people discourage you or tell you birth horror stories. If you expect it to be terrible, it will be.

Think about what you want your birth to be like. Make a birth plan, detailing what you’d like for your labour, birth and postnatal period. Show it to your midwife or doctor and get their agreement to help you achieve that birth that’s right for you.

Of course, birth plans are always flexible and we understand that sometimes they need to be modified and that’s ok. A birth plan is just that – a plan. It’s not set in concrete and women can change it at any stage.

Watch DVDs on natural birth. See, hear, read and talk about natural birth. Focus on becoming the healthiest person you can be with great nutrition and a firm exercise program. Women who are physically fit and well-nourished often have easier labours.

Finally, your choice of care provider is also worth considering. Do you know the midwife who will be caring for you in labour? Would you like to know the midwife who’ll be caring for you? Women who are well supported in continuity of carer programs such as private midwifery care are far more likely to rate their labour and birth experience as being positive and satisfying.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Charging women for non-medical caesareans?

Link

The health minister has said that women in Northern Ireland who choose to have a Caesarean for non-medical reasons may have to pay for the operation.

Edwin Poots is launching a consultation on a review of maternity services.

Women at low risk will be encouraged to consider having their baby in a midwife-led unit or at home, if appropriate.

Around 30% of deliveries are by Caesarean section – the highest level in the UK and Ireland.

… giving birth was a natural process and superb assistance was available to help women through the delivery.

“It costs several thousand pounds more for a Caesarean section so there are savings to be made,” …

“… what we want to encourage, is more people to give birth naturally because it has better outcomes for the mother and the baby.

… “We want to ensure that people take the natural choice where they can and to have that back up where they need Caesarean section to take place.”

… At present, women who elect to go private to have a Caesarean on non-medical grounds pay for their pre and post-natal care.

But the cost of the delivery is met by the health service.

… women will be encouraged to have their baby in a midwife led unit

“If you want to go down that route, if you want to pay for it, it is totally up to yourself, but I don’t feel that we the public in Northern Ireland should be paying additional money for people to have the choice.”

The minister said he expected to see a “considerable” number of midwifery units being established.

“A lot of them would be set up in association with the main maternity unit, so they would be on the same site as existing hospitals,” …

“Women would be giving birth totally with the midwives but there would be a fallback position of having an obstetrician nearby if things do not work out.”

Breedagh Hughes from the Royal College of Midwives said the focus was on trying to “normalise” child birth.

… “One of the things we hope will come out in the review will be asking trusts to look at … the reasons for the Caesarean sections and to focus on trying to prevent women from having that first Caesarean section, which very often leads to the old adage – ‘once a section always a section’.”

She said a “fear” of child birth stopped many women from choosing a natural birth.

“When one in every three women gives birth by Caesarean section, you lose that critical mass of people who know what it is like to give birth normally, and women are losing confidence in their own body’s ability to give birth,” she said.

Ms Hughes also welcomed proposals to shift the focus to midwife led care.

“I think if women are given the opportunity to get to know and trust their midwife and to trust their own bodies, we’re more likely to see women saying, ‘OK, this is what nature intended me for and this is what I’m going to do’,” …

Visit my website to explore birthing services

Has labour become a competition?

Sitting at mother’s groups, listening and observing, a general theme emerges when mothers speak of their recent births: competition. Who had the most traumatic birth? Who had the longest labour? And I came to wonder what purpose this competition serves.

I wonder if it serves a few purposes.

It reinforces birth as a scary, dangerous, even deadly experience that really must occur in hospital. “Thank god I was in hospital. My baby would have died if I had been at home!”

It validates the experience of the woman who had the most traumatic labour. The woman who wins the most-traumatic-birth-competition feels good, as any winner would do. Why would she want to give up this good feeling? After-all, she’s been traumatised by the birth and it feels good to finally have a group of women say, “wow, that was really bad!” rather than, “at least you have a healthy baby”. This reinforcement relieves the woman of her quest to find out what went wrong, and more importantly why, in attempt to avoid the same situation from occurring next time. Hence, “I’ll just go for a ceasar next time” if often heard and the other mothers agree that yes, since this woman’s birth was the most traumatic of all the births in the group, this woman is certainly justified in “going for a caesar” next time.

Other themes that emerge are an avoidance of self-responsibility, empowerment, ownership and belief in birth as a process that a woman’s body can do, if let to labour as nature intends. The most-traumatic-birth-competition rarely centres on the woman’s individual choices and decisions. It focuses on what was done to her and what was out of her control. Have we lost the ability to have the courage of our convictions, to trust our instincts, to believe in ourselves, that we hand over responsibility for our births to a stranger / professional? Often times, the mother who has had the most traumatic birth will have handed over the most responsibility for her birth. This protects the mother from any guilt: one the one hand, it was her care provider’s fault if things didn’t go to plan, and on the other hand, thank goodness she had her careprovider to sort things out and rescue her and her baby from the birth. Either way, the woman bears no responsibility for the outcome that was less-than-desirable.

The mother who had the most natural birth often doesn’t speak. She’s in the minority after all. No-one wants to hear about her amazing home waterbirth. And indeed, if she dares to speak of her positive, empowering experience, she is met with disapproval for daring to speak while Mrs Jones is re-living her nightmare to the group. The natural birth mother is labeled “odd” for ever pursuing a natural birth, and even odder for actually achieving it. She best not speak or her views will only isolate her from the group, and motherhood can be isolating enough. So now the situation is that the competition exists entirely of traumatised mothers, all seeking to be awarded the prize for having had the biggest tear, longest labour, greatest number of interventions and biggest baby. Each wants to feel that although the circumstances were not ideal, there was nothing they could have done to avert such outcomes, that they were mere victims in the unpredictable process of birth. They went to a top private hospital with the best obstetrician in Sydney (funny that they’re all “the best”) and that’s where their responsibility ends.

It’s hard to do the self-reflection and question decisions you made. Maybe you’ll learn that other decisions would have led to better outcomes and this starts the painful cycle of regret for something that cannot be changed. However, it’s ok to honour that journey and know that at the time, we made the best decisions we could have made, but now that we know differently, we will choose differently.

When this happens, maybe the competition will be on different terms. I live for the day when the competition is for the most satisfying, safe and empowering birth experience with the woman coming away with her dignity intact and feeling respected and cared for throughout her experience. It’s totally possible!

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Private midwife at public hospital

Our local newspaper wrote an article about the model of care I am able to offer women:

THE owner of Essential Birth Consulting at Bexley, Melissa Maimann, 33, has become the first private midwife in Sydney to be accredited to deliver babies in a public hospital.

She said this was exciting news for expectant mums who want a personalised delivery but might be experiencing a high-risk pregnancy.

Ms Maimann said her model of care was unique in Australia because it included access to a back-up obstetrician.

“I am able to support women with risk-associated pregnancies because obstetric care is available,” she said. “This is a real benefit to women as often those with high-risk pregnancies are limited to obstetric care with little, if any, midwifery input.”

Ms Maimann, who established Essential Birth Consulting five years ago, has helped deliver about 76 babies.

She was profiled in the Leader last December for becoming the first private midwife in St George to receive accreditation to provide Medicare-funded private midwifery services. This has equated to savings of about $2500 a client.

Ms Maimann limits bookings to an average of two births each month to ensure a high quality service for families. She supports natural births, including water birth, and vaginal birth after caesarean, vaginal twin and vaginal breech births.

“We know that continuity of care is the single most important factor for women in the pregnancy and birth care and I am proud to offer it,” she said.

“Women may have care conveniently in their home or in my Bexley clinic.”

There were 295,700 registered births in Australia in 2009, Australian Bureau of Statistics figures showed.

Details: 0400 418 448 or essentialbirthconsulting.com.au

Midwives still ‘on the fringes’

A fantastic article that my colleague in WA was interviewed for. It explains the issues perfectly.

REFORMS to the way midwives operate in WA may have been introduced last year, but unless doctors and hospitals get on board, the reforms are meaningless according to Gosnells midwife Pauline Costins.

Mrs Costins is the first eligible private practice midwife in the State following the reforms.

The changes made it possible for her to provide a midwife service not attached to a hospital that women could claim a Medicare rebate for.

Hospitals and doctors play a part in births, at least for most women, especially those with high-risk pregnancies, so there is a level of interaction required between private midwives, doctors and hospitals.

But Mrs Costins said doctors and hospitals had not been receptive to the reforms.

… “I’ve written to 40 doctors and received one response, which was a polite ‘no’.”

… She added many hospitals would not allow her to provide her services in their hospitals

“I can’t take women into hospitals as a midwife, I have to drop them at the door. They don’t want me operating in their hospital.”

Mrs Costins said Kelmscott Armadale Memorial Hospital had made her a casual employee to let her provide her services at the hospital, but that was just a temporary solution.

She added that as well as giving a personalised service, a private midwife … offered six weeks of postnatal care in comparison to hospital midwives who provide about three days.

A spokesperson for the Australian Medical Association WA said the association was willing to meet with midwives to discuss collaborative agreements.

Our experiences in NSW have not been too dissimilar. I have contacted 26 obstetricians requesting a collaborative agreement; I am very fortunate that one Obstetrician has agreed and our model of care is working really well. As for admitting rights (recommended in the Maternity Services Review), NSW is yet to finalise a policy directive to enable midwife admitting rights. This is disappointing for women and midwives alike.

Visit my website to explore birthing services

6 essential tips for a natural birth

Choosing a natural birth can be the most empowering and transformational experience in a woman’s life. In our culture, childbirth is viewed as a medical event and an emergency waiting to happen. We only have to turn on the TV and we witness birth being portrayed as a major emergency, and thank goodness those doctors were there to save the mother and baby.

As well as this, when we ask our mothers about their births, we’re bound to hear more horror stories. Forceps, stirrups, the dreaded episiotomy. Shaves, enemas, being bound to bed, not allowed to get up, let alone even sit up. Nothing to eat or drink. Husbands were not present. Is it any wonder that we are so fearful of birth?

Fear guides many birth experiences and results in the overuse of interventions and medications. As a result many women feel out of control and dis-empowered by their birth experience. It doesn’t have to be that way.

When you take responsibility for the outcome of your birth experience by becoming educated, exploring all your options, consciously choosing and creating what you want, and taking the right steps to prepare yourself, you ultimately will transform yourself and your family.

The following suggestions are designed to help you prepare to have the best birth experience possible:

1. Understand and trust the process of birth
If you understand what is happening with your body during labour, you will have more confidence and a better ability to cope. Trusting the process and knowing that everything is as it should be, is the key to “letting go” and allowing birth to happen normally and naturally. But before you can trust, you have to know what to expect. Seeking out independent childbirth education classes is the key.

2. Good nutrition
Good nutrition is essential to good health. The food we put in our mouths today will build the cells of tomorrow. In pregnancy, the food we eat also builds our baby, so we have an added responsibility to ensure that nutrition is optimal.

3. Exercise
Birth is a physical event. Staying fit can minimise pregnancy discomforts and ease the birth process. Walking or swimming and prenatal yoga are very beneficial to the health of you and your baby.

4. Relax
The key to dealing with labour is your ability to relax. Your body instinctively knows what to do and releases hormones that help you cope in labour. It is when you become scared or tense, that you interfere with the natural process and pain increases. Relaxation takes concentration and practice. I recommend Calmbirth to all women who plan a natural birth.

5. Address fears and concerns
We are constantly bombarded with negative images and stories of childbirth. Over time these messages can become ingrained in our way of thinking. It is important to recognise our attitudes and beliefs and understand how they shape our experiences. Any negative thoughts or beliefs about childbirth should be explored prior to giving birth.

6. Care provider

Your choice of care provider has a great impact on the sort of birth you will have, despite points 1 – 5 above. Having strong support throughout pregnancy and birth is critical in positively influencing the outcome of your experience. Interview and select your care provider to ensure a good “fit”. Consider engaging a private midwife to maximise your chance of a natural birth, if this is your aim. If you do not feel supported, make the necessary changes no matter how far along you are in your pregnancy.

Birth is natural and women have done it for centuries. But in today’s society, a birth without preparation may not be the one you envisioned. You have all the resources available to help you prepare for the birth experience you desire. You can choose to become empowered by your birth experience or you can give your power away. It’s up to you.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Birth Plan – Preparing a Birth Plan

An article I was interviewed for for Essential Baby:

Link

There are so many forms to fill out during your pregnancy. From Medicare forms to Family Assistance Office forms, health insurance forms and hospital pre-admission forms – life can seem like a constant procession of paperwork. There is one document though which is more interesting than most – your birth plan!

What is it?

Well, firstly a birth plan isn’t a record of how your baby’s birth will proceed; rather it is a record of your birth preferences, covering issues such as the type of birth you would like, the people who will be in attendance, and your preferred medication options. It can be a fantastic communication tool for your healthcare professionals – particularly at a time when you may be quite preoccupied!

Melissa Maimann, founder of Essential Birth Consulting, is a Sydney-based private midwife and spends a great deal of time talking her clients through their birth plan options. “A well set out birth plan is a really good way for a woman to communicate with her care providers about what is important to her in relation to the birth,” she says. “This can be particularly important for women who may not have met all of their care providers before going into labour. Depending on where you give birth and the length of your labour you might have several different midwives looking after you at various points in time and each of those midwives might be in and out of your room, looking after other women as well. A well-presented birth plan can help all of these carers to see at a glance what your stated preferences are.”

What goes in it?

What goes in to a birth plan depends on what is important to you personally about the birth. As such, every woman’s birth plan will be different. Some of the common inclusions though are:

  • Birth companions. The people who will be with you throughout your labour might include your doula, partner, parents or other friends.
  • Environment. Do you want the lighting dimmed? Aromatherapy oils? Particular music? Anything that is important to you about your environment can be included in your plan.
  • Pre-delivery activities. Some people wish to keep as active as possible during their labour, others may prefer to be resting as much as possible. Any special items, such as a bean bag, fitball or birthing pool that you particularly want could be listed here.
  • Medical monitoring. You may wish to be constantly monitored or to reduce your monitoring and examination to a minimum.
  • Pain relief. There are many pain relief options, including breathing exercises, gas, pethedine and epidural. You may wish to outline which pain relief options you are willing to try, and in what preferred order.
  • Preferred delivery position. While you may change your mind at the time, you might want tor record your preferred birthing position.
  • Any procedures that you would like to avoid if possible. Some examples might include induction, rupture of the membranes, use of forceps.
  • Post-birth procedure. Cord-cutting, skin-to-skin contact, specialist examinations and immunization could all be covered in your birth plan.
  • How to write it.

    As well as spending plenty of time researching your birth options, Melissa Maimann stresses the importance of presenting them in an easy-to-read way, so that your busy medical carers can understand at a glance the things that are important to you. “Putting together a birth plan is almost like doing an assignment,” says Melissa. “Although it is the result of hours of research and preparation, the end result should be short and concise and well laid out.”

    Melissa advises that a birth plan should be one to two pages maximum – otherwise the midwives may not have time to read it all. “Also, pick out the top three things that are the most important of all to you and put those in bold writing at the top of the birth plan,” suggests Melissa. “That way even if the whole plan doesn’t get read, hopefully those most important things will. Set it out neatly and make it easy to read with clear headings and bullet points.”

    Who should have one?

    Everyone! Birth can be unpredictable but just the exercise of researching your options and deciding what your preferences are is a great experience – and usually it will happen. “Even if you are intending to have a cesarean you should still have a birth plan to cover issues such as lighting, skin to skin contact and feeding, says Melissa Maimann. “In my experience, ninety-five percent of what a woman wants happens when the birth plan is reasonably open and flexible.”

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Ob-gyn guidelines often based on opinion, weak data

    I am not sure of the intent of the article below as although guidelines may not be based on good, solid evidence (which is often in scarce supply), that is no reason for experts not to work together to create guidelines that are based on the best available evidence and experience. If we did not have guidelines for clinical practice, we would not have a standard to inform best clinical care. The guidelines that are created may well turn out to be ineffective, inappropriate or otherwise unworkable, and on that basis they would be reviewed and changed if necessary.

    Link

    Solid evidence is often missing from the practice guidelines used by obstetrician-gynecologists …

    Less than a third of the recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) are based on gold-standard scientific experiments …

    The rest are based on … expert opinion, which is subject to personal biases …

    “That is often the fall-back when there is no data,” … expert opinion is helpful in pointing out what we don’t know, but might not always translate into what’s best for patients.

    … Guidelines help doctors keep up with the latest developments in their fields and are widely perceived as a recipe for good patient care.

    But there is often surprisingly little hard data behind them …

    … guidelines panels conduct extensive reviews of the medical literature to find all relevant evidence and also take care to exclude experts with financial conflicts of interest.

    … those are two key elements in creating good guidelines.

    … “For many of the recommendations there simply is not enough data, or it is disputed,” … “So there has to be a role for expert opinion.”

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Mum has the power over trends

    Link

    Seeing that little blue line appear on a pregnancy test is the start of an exciting and daunting journey, but before expectant parents can welcome their new bundle of joy there are an often bewildering array of options to be negotiated.

    When it comes to deciding how parents would prefer their baby to be born, choosing whether to go through the private or public health system is just the start.

    Pharmaceutical versus natural or alternative pain relief options, elective caesarean or low-intervention labour, a step-by-step birth plan or see-how-it-goes attitude, obstetrician or midwife … hospital versus a birthing centre or … home birth are all options expectant parents will have to consider …

    Royal Australia and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists vice-president Louise Farrell said women were subjected to trends in birth and child raising just as they were in other areas of life, but it was important for mothers to ask themselves early in the pregnancy what they wanted to achieve.

    “There has been a strong move towards reducing intervention into childbirth …

    “People who would like a less medical setting may opt for a home- birth experience …

    … Caesarean sections accounted for about 30 per cent of all births in Australia …

    Private hospitals generally recorded a higher rate of caesarean births than their public counterparts, while just one per cent of births happened in the home.

    … midwifery director Margaret Davies said while caesarean rates were increasing, vaginal deliveries remained the most popular option.

    Epidurals were perennially popular, but there was a growing trend for women to explore non-pharmaceutical pain relief options.

    … water births … were increasingly in demand by mothers …

    The push for water therapy had seen many hospitals and birthing centres upgrade their facilities … but parents needed to investigate whether their preferred labour setting had the qualified staff and equipment to offer it as a safe option.

    Community Midwifery WA director Pip Brennan said one trend that continued to grow was the desire for continuity of care from pregnancy through to a baby’s early months.

    … Ms Brennan said regardless of what the current trends were, women had more power than they realised in determining the future direction of birthing policies …

    We live in exciting times where we have so many birthing options available to us. The challenge is to ensure that every pregnant woman is aware of the full range of options available to her: public, private, midwife, obstetrician, birth place, type of birth – and then the all-important preparation for the type of birth she wants.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Is caesarean now the ‘normal’ way to give birth, and should we be worried?

    Link

    There’s no doubt that caesarean sections are an essential procedure that can save the lives of women and babies. But around one in three Australian women will give birth by caesarean section – and that’s not just to save lives.

    … The rising caesarean section rate in most of the developed world has not resulted in reduced rates of stillbirth or infant death – quite the contrary.

    One Australian study showed that babies were more likely to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit if they were born by elective caesarean section than other types of delivery. A previous caesarean section also increases the risk of stillbirth.

    In terms of outcomes for women, those who have emergency and elective cesarean sections are less likely to exclusively breastfeed. And there is growing evidence that caesarean operations increase the risk of the mother dying or becoming ill with blood loss, blood clots, abdominal organ injury and the need for a hysterectomy.

    It’s important to consider the risks of caesarean births. But rather than just focus on the polarised “vaginal birth vs caesarean birth” debate – which pitches doctors against midwives, and doesn’t help women who are stuck in the middle – we need to focus on the ways we can support all women to have the best outcome from childbirth.

    It seems that one of the driving forces behind the rising caesarean section rate is fear … about labour and birth, and from doctors and midwives who are themselves fearful of the birthing process.

    … we should be examining why women are fearful of labour and birth and what our health system can do to reduce this fear.

    Our health system is generally an unfriendly one for pregnant women and it’s likely that this compounds the fear of birth. It’s common for a pregnant woman receiving care in the public system to see up to 30 different caregivers through pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period.

    The opportunity for pregnant women to develop a meaningful relationship with her health care provider, discuss her fears, affirm her needs and develop confidence in labour and birth are minimal.

    … One of the disturbing elements of birth in the 21st century is the lack of respect for privacy for labouring women. The entourage of people appearing uninvited into labour rooms in most hospitals is astonishing. Each labour and birth can have a multitude of spectators, including a midwife, obstetrician, registrar, resident, student midwife, medical student and on it goes.

    … To address this problem and encourage Australian women to give birth normally, … In NSW, the Towards Normal Birth Policy was released last year and provides 10 steps towards supporting more women to go into labour and ultimately have a normal birth.

    The policy recognises that ”… unnecessary interference in the natural process may disturb the expected course and may lead to a cascade of intervention.”

    The challenge is to redesign the health system to facilitate women’s confidence and trust in birth. Fundamental changes need to occur to ensure all women are supported during pregnancy and feel confident in their ability to give birth, including:

  • Continuity of caregiver;
  • Increased options for the style of birth, with access to a birthing pool;
  • A positive environment, free of disruptions; and
  • One-to-one midwifery care in labour so women are never left alone or fearful.
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant! What are my next steps?

    If you have just found out you are pregnant, congratulations! You might be feeling a range of emotions: excited, fearful, overwhelmed, happy, anxious … this is all very normal! Many women who contact me feel unsure about what to do next and are anxious to know all their options before making a choice, so I have put together a few tips to make you feel a little more confident.

    Although many women see their GP as their first port of call when they are pregnant, it’s handy to know that women may also see an eligible midwife who can order all the necessary pregnancy tests and any scans that are needed. An eligible midwife can also talk with you about the available options for your pregnancy and birth care, in a relaxed and unhurried setting. An eligible midwife can help you determine your due date and arrange any referrals that you may need. She can book you into a hospital, refer you to an obstetrician if needed, and also provide full pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant. Who should I go to for care? A Midwife or an Obstetrician?

    Private Midwife:

  • Provides autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care for women who are experiencing normal, healthy pregnancies
  • Provides care in consultation with an obstetrician when a woman’s pregnancy has risk factors (eg high blood pressure, prem labour, concern for baby’s growth, gestational diabetes etc)
  • Transfers responsibility for care to an obstetrician if complications emerge and continues to provide care within the midwifery scope of practice
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Private Obstetrician:

  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Receives referrals from midwives for women with risk-associated pregnancies or births
  • Always provides labour and birth care (including caesarean) in collaboration with a midwife
  • Obstetric care on average results in a high degree of intervention such as induction, epidural, caesarean and episiotomy
  • Provides brief in-hospital consultations after the baby is born, followed by a 6-week check
  • Pregnancy appointments are generally no more than 15 minutes in duration
  • Collaborative care: private midwife and private obstetrician

  • Receive autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care from one midwife and one obstetrician regardless of risk factors
  • No transfer of care if risk factors emerge
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Supports women to birth naturally, including with twins, a breech baby or a VBAC
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Choosing the right care provider

    Choosing the right practitioner is a very personal decision and there is no right or wrong choice. Some women will make an initial choice of care provider and decide to change care providers during the pregnancy other women will make one choice in their first pregnancy and then a different choice in a subsequent pregnancy. What’s important is understanding all the options available so that you can feel confident to choose the best option for your needs.

    When you are considering a care provider, it’s also necessary to consider where you would like to give birth and to ensure that your care provider can attend you in your chosen setting. You might choose to birth your baby in a public hospital as a public or private patient, in a private hospital as a private patient, in a birth centre or at home. It can be helpful when trying to make a decision to write down a list of questions you may have and also consider what is important to you as you make your choices. For example:

    What do I want from my care?
    What type of practitioner would I feel most comfortable with?
    Do I want public or private care?

    These are questions only you can answer. Other questions are for your care providers, and it’s a good idea to interview a few care providers – midwives and obstetricians – before making a choice. Midwives and obstetricians will charge a fee for interviews and you are able to claim this through Medicare (your midwife will need to be eligible in order for you to claim a Medicare benefit). It is important during the interview that you ask all the questions that are on your mind, and to be aware of how you feel throughout the interview. Your care provider should inspire you with confidence, help you to feel at ease and comfortable, and the appointment should feel unhurried.

    Likewise, your care provider may like to “interview” you, and this is so that your care provider can be sure that s/he can meet your needs. Maternity care is provided in a partnership and so it’s important that both parties feel really comfortable with the other.

    There are many questions you might wish to ask your care provider; the best suggestion is to consider what is important to you and write a list of questions.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant and I have private health insurance. What are my options?

    Great question! There are a few options available to you as a private patient, as well as all of the options that are available to public patients. Specifically, the private options are either a private midwife, or a private obstetrician.

    Private midwife
    To receive care from a private midwife and obtain Medicare benefits, your midwife will need to work with an obstetrician or a doctor who provides obstetric services. Some private midwives are able to provide labour and birth care in hospital settings, while others are only able to provide labour and birth care at home. All private midwives can provide pregnancy and postnatal care. Hospital options may include private or public hospitals; it’s best to ask your midwife which hospitals she attends births at.

    Private obstetrician
    Private obstetricians can provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care, although birth care would also be provided by hospital midwives who may be unknown to you until birth. Private obstetricians deliver babies at public and private hospitals.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Are home births safe?

    Link

    Jon Barrett is accustomed to dealing with anxious mothers-to-be. As chief of maternal-fetal medicine at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, one of the main concerns he hears from patients involves unnecessary medical interventions during delivery.

    He acknowledges that the rate of Caesarian sections and episiotomies is far too high … But he’s more unnerved by what that phenomenon appears to be triggering: a surge in demand for home births.

    Barrett’s concerns about home births stem from experience. Between 1990 and 1992, he was part of an obstetric “flying squad” in Newcastle, England. His job was to travel, by ambulance, to the bedsides of women whose home births had gone awry …

    Two incidents are particularly vivid. The first occurred in winter. Navigating the ambulance through snowy laneways, Barrett’s team arrived to find two midwives frantically working over an unconscious woman. She was in shock and hemorrhaging badly. “I’ve never seen so much blood in my life.” She survived, but only after a massive blood transfusion in hospital. The second woman developed pre-eclampsia, which caused seizures, and went into cardiac arrest as his ambulance pulled up. His team was able to restart her heart and intubate her before rushing her to hospital. She also survived. He says both conditions were unpredictable and could have occurred anywhere, “But I know they would have come less close to dying if it would have happened in hospital.”

    Unlike some of his colleagues on the squad who witnessed fetal deaths during home births, if Barrett’s memories were reduced to pure data in a typical study, they’d be unremarkable. That’s because most home birth data measures deaths, not complications, and his patients survived. “If you want a retrospective study, there’s no maternal mortality there . . . and so is that safe? No, it’s just bloody lucky.”

    The question of how best to measure home birth safety has long plagued researchers … what is counted — mortality rates for mothers and babies during childbirth — offers little insight on the maternal side because … maternal deaths from childbirth are rare … But stories like Barrett’s suggest the numbers don’t tell the whole story. In his view, the bottom line should be obvious: “Sooner or later you’re going to get a disaster because that’s the nature of obstetrics.” He adds, “It’s very rare that it will happen, but it’s got to happen more in home birth.”

    That assertion is at the heart of a furious debate in the birthing community. Mothers who choose to give birth at home often cite research showing there are fewer medical interventions and no increased risk. But in the past year, a new study has emerged that contradicts this. It shows that home births are associated with significantly higher death rates for babies. If correct, the rights of women to control their own bodies and birth experience would seem to conflict with the best interests of their children.

    When the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) released the now-controversial “Wax Study” last summer, it created the medical equivalent of the Rift Valley amongst birthing experts … [It] confirmed significant benefits to mothers who gave birth at home, including less hemorrhaging, vaginal tearing and epidural use, and fewer infections and Caesarean sections. Unfortunately, these benefits seemed to occur at the baby’s expense: … the report showed that neonatal deaths (defined as deaths within 28 days of birth) were two to three times higher for home births. Clearly, no woman who chooses home birth believes she’s jeopardizing her baby’s health, but the study suggested such faith in the safety of home birthing is undermined by medical evidence. For those who accepted Wax’s results, the benefits of giving birth at home suddenly appeared trivial compared to the risks.

    In many ways, Wax’s study was groundbreaking … a meta-analysis, combined and re-analyzed existing studies, in order to create a bigger sample and, ideally, a more accurate result. He looked at more than 230 peer-reviewed papers published between 1950 and 2009, and selected a dozen that compared planned home births with planned hospital births by low-risk mothers in industrialized countries (Australia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada and the U.S.). The study’s vast scope—it encompassed more than 500,000 deliveries—boosted its credibility. As one doctor put it, “half a million births cuts out a lot of noise.”

    Perhaps, but the momentary silence was followed by an outraged roar from home birth supporters, including some whose research showed very different results. “The Wax study is full of mathematical errors,” says Patti Janssen, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Population and Public Health, and lead author of a 2009 cohort study that showed home births to be as safe as hospital births, for women and babies. “The design was wrong, and the calculations were wrong, and it just has to be thrown out the window.” …

    … Wax initially defended his work, but then began refusing interviews … As a flood of letters poured into the AJOG … the publication convened an independent panel to examine the main complaints. In April, it published a sample of those letters, along with a detailed response from Wax. It also released the panel’s conclusion that the study did not need to be retracted.

    But the debate has continued, and gained force, in the wake of a second study … out of the Netherlands … it concluded that babies born to low-risk women, under a midwife’s care (in hospital or at home) are more than twice as likely to die as those born to high-risk women who give birth under an obstetrician.

    Although these results were specific to Holland, and may indicate problems in the way the Dutch system categorizes women as “low- risk,” the study nevertheless provided fresh ammunition to those who believe babies are best delivered by obstetricians, and added fuel to the home birth debate. More letters began to fly, adding to the stack of seemingly contradictory information through which pregnant women are required to sift in order to make an educated decision.

    Nathalie Waite could be the poster mother for the perfect home birth. Waite’s considerations were largely pragmatic when she decided, two years ago, that her fifth baby should be born at home. She had four children attending three different Toronto schools, no nanny, and wanted her delivery to disrupt life as little as possible. It wasn’t a decision she made lightly. Her husband was nervous, but Waite’s midwife reassured them both. They lived near a hospital. Two attending midwives would be in close contact with Waite’s obstetrician and, at the slightest sign of trouble, an ambulance would be in her driveway. Most importantly, Waite knew her own body. She’d had four hospital births. During the two deliveries in which she’d fought … for a natural birth she’d experienced far less pain …

    Had she known what a home delivery would be like, Waite says none of her children would have been born in hospital. “It was purely beautiful.” … “it just felt so natural. It just felt right.”

    This is why home births are special, says Anne Wilson, president of the Canadian Association of Midwives. “It’s a non-medicalized environment where birth becomes a normal part of your family life.” …

    … there is no debating the fact that home births have lower intervention rates. And everyone, on both sides of the argument, agrees that hospital intervention rates are too high …

    His daughter’s birth, in Kingston, Ont., in 2007, was such “a spectacular experience” he and his wife decided to repeat it at their new home in Guelph this year. Unfortunately, their son was born with fluid in his lungs, which concerned their midwife enough to send them to hospital. Everything they experienced from that point on, Shaw says, reinforced their preconceptions. Their son was given blood tests, a chest X-ray and an IV for a condition Shaw believes would have cleared up on its own after several hours. They had to fight for permission to breastfeed … and, he says, when the pediatrician went home without leaving instructions for release, their son remained in an incubator for an additional 15 hours. “Our rights were completely taken away and doctors more or less said this is what we’re going to do to your baby and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

    … Shaw’s mistrust of the medical system runs deep. “I’ve hung around scientists enough to be skeptical of everything I’m told,” … He and his wife refused vitamin K and erythromycin ointment for their children, two treatments hospitals and midwives administer as standard protocol after birth. (Vitamin K ensures the baby’s blood can clot until it starts making the vitamin itself, and erythromycin is an antibiotic that protects against infections from the birth canal that can cause blindness.) …

    In many ways, Shaw and Waite represent opposite ends of the home birth spectrum. Certainly Shaw’s rejection of many of the fundamental tenets of modern medicine contrasts with Waite’s attempt to adapt its benefits to a home birth. But they share an important piece of common ground: both chose to deliver their babies with the help of a midwife.

    Freebirthers, women who deliver without assistance (and often shun prenatal care), represent the smallest sub-section of home birth mothers, and aren’t included in studies on home birth safety. Among their most famous advocates is Janet Fraser, an Australian woman who made famous the term “birth rape” to describe an emergency episiotomy during the birth of her son. “I don’t care if you don’t like the word or the idea, it’s real so get used to it,” … In 2009, Fraser’s baby daughter died after five days of home labour. She continues to advocate for freebirth.

    Freebirthers make most midwives nervous and they horrify obstetricians. Freebirth is the equivalent of playing “Russian roulette with your child,” says André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). “You don’t play with a child’s life. Especially not where [health care is] free.” That said, the SOGC does believe that midwife-assisted home births are “a reasonable alternative for low-risk women.”

    Yet, asked if he would consider home birth a reasonable option for his family, Lalonde is unequivocal. “No. Definitely not.” He falls back on experience for explanation. “I’ve participated in over 6,000 deliveries in my career and I know that everything looks very fine and suddenly disaster strikes.”

    That conflict between medical experience and faith in a woman’s body to deliver naturally lies at the heart of the home birth debate. But is the concept of natural childbirth in danger of being romanticized? … There is a documentary, popular amongst home birth advocates, entitled Orgasmic Birth; its website invites viewers to “witness the passion as birth is revealed as an integral part of woman’s sexuality and a neglected human right.” Ami McKay’s award-winning novel The Birth House makes a compelling case for home births to a more mainstream audience. In it, the doctor is portrayed as a condescending, patriarchal figure who knocks out his protesting patients with ether, then yanks out their babies. In contrast, the methods of midwife Dora Rare are equally suspect (think mandrake root and witchcraft) yet portrayed with exquisite humanity …

    That kind of experience need not be exclusive to home birth, insist obstetricians. “We should be working to make the environment of the hospital conducive to the home birth experience, rather than having more deliveries at home,” Sunnybrook’s Barrett says.

    But midwives like Anne Wilson maintain there’s nothing to equal the experience of a home birth. “If I am delivering a baby in the hospital, you’re a guest in my house. If I’m delivering a baby at home, I’m a guest in your house. And there’s quite a lot of psychological difference there.” Wilson hopes the demand for home births will continue to rise in Canada … she believes that all low-risk women, including those who choose to give birth in hospital, should deliver with a midwife.

    That’s the system adopted by the Netherlands — and the Evers study suggests it’s failing dramatically …

    “I don’t think it’s that important to debate whether [homebirth is] safe, safer or not safe. I think it’s very important to debate how we can make home birth safer because women are going to do it anyway.”

    In the United States, one way to improve safety is by improving midwifery. Training and regulations are a patchwork across the country; in some states, midwives aren’t even required to finish high school. In that respect, the U.S. lags many industrialized countries, including Canada. It’s one of the reasons Canadian midwives bristle at comparisons.

    In contrast to the U.S., {Canadian] midwives are university educated, highly regulated, and well-trained in emergency skills …

    Obstetricians and midwives are in broad agreement on the key measures necessary to reduce risk during home birth. They are the steps taken by Waite: ideally, a low-risk woman would deliver with the assistance of two highly trained midwives who are in close contact with an obstetrician at a nearby hospital. When those steps are put in place, Wald­man says, “it can work almost as safely as the hospital situation.”

    Is “almost” good enough when you’re talking about the survival of a newborn baby? Although he describes himself as a long-time supporter of midwives and birthing centres, the ACOG’s Waldman echoes his Canadian counterpart, Lalonde, when he says he wouldn’t want a home birth for his wife or daughter. “The intrapartum loss rate has got to be higher at home, it’s just intuitional for anybody who does this work. How big that number is could be debated.”

    And is being debated. As larger and larger studies are undertaken, Sunnybrook’s Jon Barrett believes the data will start to show consistently higher risks associated with home births …

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Hospital births continuing through our service

    Given the troubled times for midwives attending hospitals in a birth support role – either for planned hospital birth or in a homebirth transfer situation – I have had many calls from current clients and women who are exploring their birthing options, asking if hospital births are still going ahead through this service. I wanted to provide reassurance that yes, my hospital birth service is continuing! I am continuing to take bookings for hospital birth and I am able to attend hospital births in the full capacity of a midwife.

    Owing to an ongoing collaborative agreement and hospital arrangements, hospital births are continuing. Women book with me early in their pregnancy and have all of their care with me. Women also see an obstetrician twice in their pregnancy. Birthing takes place in a hospital setting complete with waterbirthing. We support VBAC, twin and breech births. It is an all-risk model too, so women don’t need to be “low risk” to benefit from continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. It also means that there is no “transfer” if a woman’s pregnancy becomes high risk: she can still receive the same wonderful care and support from her chosen midwife and obstetrician.

    Hospital staff are not routinely involved in the care of women who book through our service and we have gone to great lengths to create a birth centre feel to the birthing rooms. Rooms are quiet, warm and peaceful and we have a variety of tools available to support natural, active birthing such as floor mats, bath, shower and birth balls and of course many women also choose to bring personal items from home.

    After the baby is born, we support early discharge with many women choosing to go home four hours after the birth. Of course women may stay longer if they wish. I visit daily for the first week, twice in the second week and then weekly until discharge at 6 weeks.

    Should there be any issues along the way, we have ready access to a specialist obstetrician who is known to the woman from pregnancy.

    So the short answer is YES! I am able to continue to attend hospital births and am receiving many calls about the popular model of care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    ‘Illegal’ midwives: Is Australia destined for the same?

    An article from Canada explains their midwifery system which includes unregistered midwives.

    Ann (not her real name) operates outside the regulated profession, living life on the edge, exposed to a constant threat of legal action should births under her watch go wrong.

    She knows five other unregistered midwives working in Montreal’s so-called “parallel network.” They typically help women who are unable to secure legal midwife services to have their babies at home or in a birthing centre, and who reject the official alternative of giving birth in a hospital

    There is no shortage of demand for their services. With just 140 registered midwives able to practise across the entire province, the parallel network fills a yawning gap in the market. Much of the birthing industry – obstetricians, gynecologists and some registered midwives – would consider its covert practitioners to be charlatans. But, to women determined to choose how, where and with whom they give birth, they are valued allies.

    Take Teprine Baldo, who had her eldest child, now 2 years old, at home with the help of what she calls a “midwife recognized by the community. I prefer the term. It’s more respectful. People tend to talk about illegal midwives the way they used to talk about witches,” she says.

    There has been one prosecution over the years. In 2006, Diane Boutin was forced to transfer a woman in her care to … Hospital after complications set in mid-labour. Following an emergency Caesarean, the gynecologist on duty filed a complaint with the provincial order of midwives … which went on to successfully pursue Boutin for illegal practice under Quebec’s professional code, a felony carrying a fine of up to $6,000.

    In the days before the profession began its slow march toward legalization in the 1990s, all midwives were renegades operating outside the system, some entirely self-taught, others holding foreign qualifications unrecognized by the province. But, times have changed and as the now-regulated profession wages a PR battle for public acceptance, pushing against residual resistance from an often skeptical medical establishment, it cannot be seen to condone illegal practice.

    parents are likely to be the biggest losers when things go wrong, should newborns be left damaged as a direct result of negligence or malpractice.

    It’s a hugely sensitive issue. Sinclair Harris, a registered midwife at Pointe Claire birthing centre, is sympathetic with her unregistered counterparts. But, she says, “You need an understanding of pathology, of the things that can go wrong, if you are to be available for the mainstream public.”

    Women like Baldo are incredulous that they are still being denied that choice, outraged that the black market midwives helping the most determined to exercise basic rights over their bodies risk prosecution.

    “It’s like we’re being told we can’t birth properly,” she says. “I’m not against hospitals. My issue is that there’s often no alternative.”

    At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife

    Seeking closure after a traumatic first birth in hospital, Caroline Gauthier gave birth to her second child at home with an unregistered midwife.

    She was living in British Columbia, pregnant with her first child, when her dream of an intervention-free home birth went awry. Transferred to hospital by her registered midwife after her cervix was slow to dilate, she was administered hormones to speed up labour.

    “I was like Jabba the Hutt, hooked up to the monitor,” she says. Staff forgot to turn on the oxygen supply to her mask, leaving her flailing about for help. When her baby finally arrived after a traumatic final push, she was barely able to touch his foot before he was whisked away.

    Pregnant with her second child in Quebec, she immediately set about trying to secure a midwife at the Du Boisé birthing centre in the Laurentians. However, her place was contingent on her delivering at the birthing centre.

    But Gauthier had already set her heart on giving birth at home. At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife. Again, her labour was long, but she sat out the hours in the bath and in bed. “This time, I had a midwife who didn’t have a system to please,” she says.

    After three days of labour, the baby’s head popped out while she was on her way to the bath. “In less than two minutes, the whole body was out,” she says. He didn’t immediately cry, “but nobody made a circus out of it.”

    Vindicated by her second experience, she is now a fierce advocate of women’s right to give birth as they choose. “I was given the time my baby needed,” she says. “My neighbours tell me I was so brave delivering at home. My reaction is: ‘My God, you’re brave giving birth in hospital. You’re putting yourself at their mercy. You don’t know what you’re getting yourself into.’ ”

    The midwife: With no insurance, every new client is a gamble

    On D-day, Ann arrives on the scene with a case containing oxygen supplies, a heart monitor, synthetic oxytocin, herbal remedies, suture material and local anesthetic for stitches.

    She has been practising midwifery in the parallel network for more than 10 years. Clients find their way to her by word of mouth. She has a busy schedule year round, attending to three or four clients a month.

    Clients are generally women who have been unable to find a registered midwife …

    Occasionally she has transferred cases to hospital …

    With no insurance, every new client is a gamble. “My insurance is the trust I develop with the parents. I trust people who have the deep belief that it’s best for the birth of the baby. Nobody can be sure of the end result.”

    There is a contract, though she is clearly ill at ease with cold legal realities. “It’s about ensuring the parents understand what they’re getting into,” she says. “But, sometimes I forget to get people to sign. We’re on another level. It’s not about business.”

    She describes herself as a self-taught midwife eschewing a system where midwives are “too stressed, too watched.” …

    The four-year university program didn’t appeal to her. “I thought it was too focused on pathology. There was no alternative medicine. No spirituality,” she says. “It’s as if only one kind of intelligence is allowed. Forget emotional intelligence.”

    Midwifery was legalized in Quebec in 1999, following a five-year pilot project. Home births with the assistance of registered midwives have only been allowed since 2005.

    In a 2007 Statistics Canada report, 71 per cent of women who had delivered with a registered midwife rated the experience as “very positive,” compared with 53 per cent of women who had delivered in a hospital.

    According to research … midwife-assisted home births are associated with lower rates of obstetric interventions and adverse outcomes. Newborns born at home were also less likely to require resuscitation or oxygen therapy.

    Australia is heading for a similar situation, brought about by a few factors: the recent position statement on homebirth which effectively prevents midwives from attending high risk births at home, the lack of visiting rights to enable most midwives to birth in hospital with their clients, dissatisfaction with current hospital-based maternity services that are seen by women to be impersonal and highly interventionist, and a differing view of things such as risk and responsibility. Although some midwives are making the choice to unregister and continue to attend births, they do face the same issues that are explained in the article.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Well-off mothers spend thousands on private midwives

    An article
    from the UK explains that women are spending thousands of pounds on private midwives to achieve the ‘perfect’ birth. The situation is not too different to the Australian experience.

    In the UK, private midwives charge between £1,800 and £5,000 for a birth, but their services are in high demand from professional, well-educated women who have become disenchanted with the hospital experience. The number of mothers paying for private midwives to attend home births has tripled in the last eight years.

    Demand has become so high in parts of London and the South East that some expectant mothers have been unable to find a private midwife to assist them.

    Many of the expectant mothers are older and have been put off by previous experiences in NHS maternity wards.

    Women who engage private midwives claim they can form a relationship with one person rather than seeing a succession of strangers.

    Midwives understand that women want continuity of care and someone to talk to them and answer their questions. Women don’t want routine and unnecessary interventions in their pregnancy and birth, and they want more extensive postnatal care.

    The Australian experience is the same as that in the UK. Women seek private midwifery care for home birth or hospital birth so that they can form a relationship with one person who will be with them from their first antenatal appointment, through to birth and 6 weeks after their baby is born.

    In Australia, eligible midwives can provide medicare-funded care which makes private midwifery care more affordable to women, thanks to the maternity reforms.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Caesarean section? Vaginal birth? Your choice!

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Much has been said and written about an article in The Age this weekend. The article is about a randomised study that will compare the outcomes of 500 women who choose a caesarean and 500 women who choose a vaginal birth. The study will explore psychological and physical outcomes for the women and their babies, including depression and breastfeeding rates. It will only compare vaginal births with caesareans for healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies.

    The study has created much debate, including issues of ethics (beneficence, autonomy, non-maleficence) and professional duty of care. I wonder if part of the “answer” will not be answered by this study, since the study only addresses outcomes from the first pregnancy, but most women do not have one child, they have two, on average. It’s reasonable to assume that a woman who has an elective caesarean for her first baby, will go onto have an elective caesarean for her second baby.

    In the current maternity system in NSW, a woman who chooses a vaginal birth for her first baby has the following outcomes:

  • only 52% women having their first baby will have a normal birth
  • 33% will be induced
  • 23% will have forceps or vacuum
  • 25% will have a caesarean – and of these women, only 12% will have a vaginal birth in their subsequent pregnancy.
  • In other words, only 75% of first time mums who elect to have a vaginal birth will actually have one.

    In contrast, a first time Mum who chooses a vaginal birth with a private midwife has about a 95% chance of having a vaginal birth.

    The real question isn’t the outcomes of a first-time Mum’s pregnancy when she chooses a vaginal birth or a caesarean, but rather, what happens for the average woman who has two children, who has elected a caesarean with her first versus a vaginal birth with her first baby. In other words, how about we compare the outcomes of women who have two caesareans, with women who elect to have a vaginal birth the first time around, 75% of whom will birth vaginally, and 25% of whom will have a caesarean.

    Such a study would address the issue of second caesarean risks. Serious maternal morbidity (eg placenta praevia, placenta accreta, uterine rupture, need for hysterectomy and blood transfusion) increases progressively with increasing number of cesarean sections a woman has. The first caesarean is generally very safe but increasing numbers of caesareans are perhaps not so safe.

    A further issue with the study is that it does not suggest any method or support for the women who elect to birth vaginally. Will they be supported with one-to-one midwifery care, as this is known to increase vaginal birth rates? Will they include homebirthing women who are highly motivated to birth normally and without interventions? Or will it be standard obstetric / hospital-based births with high rates of intervention that are already known to result in reduced breastfeeding rates and a dissatisfaction with the birthing experience? I will wait to read the results.