Homebirth: What to expect

Homebirth care is always individualised to the needs of the woman and family.  The following information can help you to understand what may happen in labour, to give you a sense of your options and lessen any surprises. When you birth at home, you can expect to:

- Wear whatever you like in labour
- Have vaginal examinations when / if you want them. Your midwife may suggest an examination if she feels it is needed, which is not very often as we know that babies are born whether vaginal examinations are performed or not and many women prefer to avoid them wherever possible.
- To have your temperature, blood pressure and pulse taken when it is necessary to do so – sometimes this is not done at all
- Have your baby’s heart beat listened to with a hand-held doppler that allows you to remain in the bath or shower.
- If additional fluids are needed, you can expect your midwife to offer you lots of drinks – this will also help to keep up your energy levels. In fact, your midwife will probably offer food and fluids regularly throughout your labour anyway.
- We don’t use ID bands at home. Not for Mum, not for baby. No chance of anyone getting lost, everyone knows who’s who, and no mother is handed the wrong baby!
- Your waters are very unlikely to be broken at home.
- You can expect to give birth in the position that’s most comfortable to you at the time. For many women, this is kneeling (so you can catch your own baby) or all fours (and your partner can catch the baby).
- Waterbirth is a common birth method at home.
- While “pain relief” is not offered, your midwife will make suggestions to assist your level of comfort such as position changes, hot packs, bath, shower, massage and so on.
- You will find that your body will push instinctively when the time’s right.
- Many women will not tear and episiotomy is very rare at home.
- Placentas usually come of their own accord, in their own time provided that the blood loss is not excessive.
- Your baby’s cord will be cut after the placenta is born, and some women prefer to leave it intact and have a lotus birth.
- There is no separation of mother and baby.

Learn more about private midwifery care, antenatal shared care and antenatal classes

Risk assessment in pregnancy and birth

Risk assessment has been around for a long time in maternity care and has become more widely spoken about as midwifery-led services have expanded. Risk assessment is a way of identifying potential problems and minimising risks to the woman and baby. Some form of risk assessment is used in almost every profession and although the actual risk assessment process is not perfect, it’s the best tool we have at present. Risk assessment is used on OH&S, education, food service, health, media, emergency services, law and so on.

In maternity, risk assessment is an incredibly useful tool. The benefit of risk assessment is that it is based on science and evidence. We can state with certainty the risks of certain complications such as pre-eclampsia and this is helpful when preparing women for what to expect and things to be on the look-out for. In this way, risk assessment actually lowers the risk to the woman because she can become more involved in her care and more alert for signs that mean she needs to get help.

The downside of risk assessment is that it does tend to categorise women according to a tick-box system. Although the risk might be there, it might not necessarily eventuate for the woman sitting with us.

How can risk assessment be useful?

Risk assessment can be an incredibly useful tool for both women and midwives in helping to plan care that will meet the woman’s needs safely. Midwives are primary care providers and are responsible for proving care to healthy, low-risk women and babies throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. So a risk assessment tool helps the midwife and woman to know when a consultation or referral is needed.

Risk assessments can also highlight potential problems that would benefit from early organisation and planning before labour. This might include reviewing the birth plan, reviewing place of birth, engaging other health professionals and putting in place supports so that the woman can cope well after the baby is born.

Risk assessment can also be useful for discussing homebirth with women and their partners. Some women are perfectly suited to homebirth: they’re healthy, their pregnancy is going well and they’re wanting a natural birth. In this case, risk assessment can be used to explain to the woman that she’s safer at home.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Negative Blood Groups

Everyone has a blood group, or a blood type. The groups are O, A, B and AB. As well as this, a person may or may not contain a protein in their blood called Rhesus factor. A person who has the Rhesus factor is called “Rhesus positive” and a person who does not have this factor is called “Rhesus negative”. So people may be (for example) O positive, A negative, AB positive and so on. About 85% people are Rhesus positive. That is, they contain the Rhesus factor in their blood, so their blood group would be one of the positive ones.

The other 15% of people do not have this factor in their blood. A pregnant woman’s blood group and Rhesus factor are determined by a blood test as part of the tests that are done when a woman first discovers she is pregnant.

If a pregnant woman has a negative blood group and her partner has a positive blood group, there is a chance that the baby will also have a positive blood group. Should any of the baby’s blood get into the mother’s system, her body will make antibodies to the baby’s Rhesus factor. This doesn’t cause any problems in the current pregnancy, but the next time the woman falls pregnant, the antibodies can affect the baby. The baby can be born prematurely, miscarriage is more likely, the baby may be born anaemic and the baby is more likely to experience jaundice.

Fortunately, there is something that can be done to prevent this all from happening!

Women who are a negative blood group will be offered two injections of Anti-D in pregnancy. This prevents any antibodies from forming. After the baby is born, the baby’s blood group will be determined from blood that is in the cord, and if the baby’s blood group is found to be positive, the mother will be given another dose of Anti-D.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Planning a homebirth vs having a homebirth

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Is it just semantics? “I’m having a homebirth” versus, “I’m planning a homebirth”? I often wonder why more women don’t plan homebirths. Planning a homebirth doesn’t rule out hospital as an option if it’s needed or desired. Planning a homebirth keeps all options open and allows women to make the decision about place of birth towards the end of the pregnancy or even in labour.

Sometimes I’m concerned when I hear, “I’m having a homebirth”. The same way I’m concerned if I hear, “I’m having an epidural / induction / waterbirth” or whatever. Yes, these are our plans, but we never really know what’s going to happen until the time.

There is a transfer rate associated with homebirth and this reflects safe practice and respect for women’s decisions. Bearing that in mind, it’s wiser to say, “I’m planning a homebirth” rather than, “I’m having a homebirth”.

Also, consider the reactions from family and friends when they hear these words. When we “plan” a homebirth, friends and family are put at ease. Plans can change if they need to. The common response, “Homebirth?!?! Isn’t that … dangerous??” is no longer needed because plans can change if risks emerge. Sometimes when people hear, “I’m having a homebirth”, they don’t understand that if hospital is needed, we go. The common questions like, “what if you need a caesarean?” “what if you need an epidural?” are valid when we frame it as “having” a homebirth because these interventions are not available at home. But when homebirth is “planned”, those questions are no longer necessary: plans can change.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Benefits of Using a Midwife During Childbirth

In Australia, all babies are born with the help of a midwife. This is true whether you’re giving birth in hospital, birth centre, at home or in an operating theatre. The question is really – what are the benefits to having a midwife as your primary care provider?

So, what is a primary care provider?
A primary care provider is someone who is responsible for your pregnancy and birth care. They may also been seen as the coordinator of your care or “go-to” person. It may either be a doctor or a midwife. Your primary care provider should know all about you and your pregnancy, attend your birth and know all about your baby. Without a primary care provider, your care will be fragmented and it’s entirely possible that some important aspects of your care will be overlooked or forgotten.

Primary medical care is provided by private obstetricians or through doctor’s clinics in public hospitals.

What are the benefits of having a midwife as your primary care provider?
Midwives have a firm belief in pregnancy and birth as natural processes that women can do. In other words, they believe that a woman’s body is perfectly designed for pregnancy and birth. They look for what’s right in the pregnancy and birth, while always being mindful of risks. Midwives help to keep pregnancy and birth normal by focussing on nutrition, lifestyle, health and well being. We that with health in general, healthy people are less likely to get heart disease, diabetes and so on. Well, it’s the same in pregnancy and birth: healthy women and babies are less likely to get sick. So midwives focus on health and well being, while always being alert for situations that need more attention.

Midwives use a holistic, or biopsychosocial model of care. What this means is that you’re not just a pregnancy or a birth to a midwife. You’re a woman, mother, friend, wife, partner, employer / employee and so on. Your midwife will seek information about your life, your family, your interests and so on, as well as your health and medical history. She will take all of this information into account when making recommendations and giving advice.

Midwives are less likely to use disruptive technologies that may lead to further intervention and complications. They’re less likely to induce labour, perform an episiotomy, perform vaginal examinations, break your waters and so on. So your labour is allowed to progress naturally. When you work with your body, it will work with you. When you interfere with your bodily processes, your body will not work as well. This is especially the case in birth where there’s a strong reliance on hormones to initiate labour and keep it going.

Women are usually very satisfied with midwifery care. They feel supported, emotionally, from seeing a midwife. They feel they can trust their midwife and that their wishes are respected. Women feel more comfortable to write a birth plan and discuss their hopes and preferences for their pregnancy and labour when they see a midwife.

So, what does this mean for birth and babies?
Well, there are lots of positives! When you have a midwife as your primary care provider, you can expect:
- choice of birth place (hospital or home)
- a lower rate of caesarean
- a lower rate of episiotomy
- you’re less likely to be induced
- you’re less likely to need pain medication in labour
- you’re less likely to have your waters broken
- you will be listened to and respected
- your birth plan will be respected
- you will be able to build trust with the midwife who will help you in birth
- you will be less likely to have an assisted birth (eg forceps)
- you will have a lower chance of getting postnatal depression
- you will be less likely to have a traumatic birth
- you will be more likely to bond well with your baby
- your baby will be more likely to breastfeed successfully
- you will most likely view your labour as being very positive

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Why Birth at Home?

Homebirth provides a familiar and safe environment for birthing. This helps to keep stress hormones low, and positive birth hormones high, and can therefore make the birth easier and less painful. Women choose a homebirth because they believe in their body’s ability to birth, wish to involve their partner and other children more, or prefer to reduce the chance of intervention in their labour. And becuase let’s face it: pregnancy and birth are normal, healthy and natural experiences. We don’t go to hospital to experience other normal, healthy and natural bodily experiences such as food digestion, urination, menstruation, defecation …. we trust that our bodies work, and that these processes work too.

Women choose homebirth to:
Experience fewer complications in labour
Reduce the need for interventions
Use less pain medication
Remain in comfortable and familiar surroundings
Have a baby who has fewer problems after the birth
Increase their success with breastfeeding
Improve bonding with their baby
Provide a gentle birth for their baby
Involve other siblings and family
Have choice and control
Reduce birth trauma
Receive care from the same midwife right the way through
Benefit from having more choices available
Have a great birth!

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Birthing in hospital with your own private midwife

Many women prefer to birth their babies in hospital, but they want to have the same midwife all the way through their pregnancy, birth and post-birth period. It’s about building trust, having a familiar face and being understood and supported. During your pregnancy, we explore what birth means to you and discuss your goals for pregnancy and birth, focussing on what’s important to you, what you need, and looking at ways of making the birth as positive and healthy as possible.

I know that no two women are the same, so your care is tailored and individualised to your needs.

Your care

As your private midwife, I provide clinical care, information, advice and emotional support as you journey through your pregnancy and birth. I meet with you regularly in pregnancy so we can learn about each other, and so you can more feel comfortable with me. I help you formulate a birth plan and de-brief previous birth experiences.

When your labour starts, we will be in frequent contact and we will decid whether I should see you at home before heading to hospital, or whether we will meet at the hospital. I will remain your midwife in hospital, caring for you through your labour until your baby is safely born. Early discharge from hospital is encouraged, and we will continue your care at home for 6 weeks.

It’s important to have an understanding of how the general hospital system (public or private) works, to really appreciate why it is so valuable to have your own privat midwife for a hospital birth. Hospital midwives are often busy caring for other women in labour: a hospital-employed midwife often cares for 2-3 labouring women at any given time, while also answering phones, performing administrative roles and so on. When you have your own private midwife with you, she is dedicated to you, and hospital staff are not involved in your care unless invited. This means you have the undivided attention of the midwife you know and trust. Other than your partner and chosen support people, formal birth support is not needed as your private midwife will be right by your side, supporting you all the way.

You benefit from:
- higher chance of normal vaginal birth
- minimal intervention during birth
- professional advice and clinical care
- lowest chance of caesarean
- lowest chance of episiotomy
- lower requirement for pain relief
- higher breastfeeding rates
- lower rates of pregnancy admissions to hospital
- access to midwife means you can change to home birth at any time and have that mifwife as your primary care provider
- midwives can monitor your baby in pregnancy and labour
- midwives can monitor your health in pregnancy and labour
- midwives can liaise with other health professionals if needed

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Preparing for a natural birth and going with the flow

In society today, there is a great focus on pain in labour birth, with the assumption that women cannot handle the pain of labour and that women need medical assistance in the form of an epidural or drugs to get through. Many women go to hospital saying, “Well, I’d like a natural birth, but I’ll go with the flow”.

Even with today’s technology, birth comes with pain most of the time. Even for those women who are sure they want an epidural, they will still feel some pain as epidurals are given once labour is established, after 4cm dilation. There is usually pain / discomfort to get to that point.

And once women get to 4cm, the last 6 are usually much faster and easier to get through. That’s because our bodies are designed to release natural pain relief that helps with the later stages of labour.

The best thing is to learn techniques for managing the sensations of labour, to feel well prepared for labour and birth.

When preparing for a natural birth, most women feel better informed – and therefore relaxed – if they have read a lot about labour and birth. Women who are well-informed about the process of birth, the options available to them and what they can expect, are generally more accepting of the sensations of labour. They are not fearful because they know what to expect and what might happen next.

It’s a great idea to read other women’s birth stories – positive and negative – to give a balanced view of what happens, what is possible and what you might like for your own labour.

Independent childbirth education is excellent for teaching women in an unbiased way about all the options available to them.

Calmbirth is another fantastic tool for assisting with natural birth.

It’s essential to be surrounded with positive messages about birth. Try to limit contact with people who are skeptical and judgmental of your plans for a natural birth. Don’t let people discourage you or tell you birth horror stories. If you expect it to be terrible, it will be.

Think about what you want your birth to be like. Make a birth plan, detailing what you’d like for your labour, birth and postnatal period. Show it to your midwife or doctor and get their agreement to help you achieve that birth that’s right for you.

Of course, birth plans are always flexible and we understand that sometimes they need to be modified and that’s ok. A birth plan is just that – a plan. It’s not set in concrete and women can change it at any stage.

Watch DVDs on natural birth. See, hear, read and talk about natural birth. Focus on becoming the healthiest person you can be with great nutrition and a firm exercise program. Women who are physically fit and well-nourished often have easier labours.

Finally, your choice of care provider is also worth considering. Do you know the midwife who will be caring for you in labour? Would you like to know the midwife who’ll be caring for you? Women who are well supported in continuity of carer programs such as private midwifery care are far more likely to rate their labour and birth experience as being positive and satisfying.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Babies Born At 37-38 Weeks More Likely To Have Health Problems

Link

… babies born just a few weeks premature have worse health outcomes than babies born at full term …

… both babies born at 32-36 weeks … and 37-38 weeks (early term) required hospitalization in the first few months compared to those born at full term (39-41 weeks). In addition, the risk of wheezing and asthma was increased among babies born between 33 and 36 weeks compared to babies born at full term.

The researchers found a strong association between increasing risk of poor health outcomes and decreasing gestation, and that the greatest contribution to disease at age 3 and 5 was being born moderate/ later preterm or early term.

… mothers of early preterm babies were less likely to breast feed for 4+ months compared to women who gave birth after 37 weeks, and were more likely to smoke …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Inducing Labor Better for Big Babies

Link

The study below has made a compelling argument for induction for babies who are thought to be large for their gestational age. The first thing to ascertain before deciding on a course of action, is that the baby is truly larger than expected. All methods of judging a baby’s size in the uterus are prone to error, for example ultrasound has a 15% margin of error. Therefore we need to take this into account when we are advising women of the safest options. Many inductions (and even caesareans) are performed for “big” babies, only to have the induction go pear-shaped and lead to a caesarean … for a 3.5Kg baby. On the other hand, an earlier induction for a genuinely large baby may well prevent a caesarean, forceps birth, perineal trauma (tears, episiotomy) and so on.

Large-for-date babies are more likely to experience neonatal trauma if nature is allowed to take its course than if labor is induced …

Among fetuses estimated sonographically to be above the 95th percentile for weight, adverse events such as shoulder dystocia were three times less likely if labor was induced …

Induction of labor also was associated with a greater likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery …

Previous observational studies have suggested that induction of labor may lower birth weight and decrease the chance for neonatal injury such as shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, and death.

However, studies also found increased rates of cesarean section with induction, and the reliability of fetal weight estimation has been questioned.

… 817 women … were assigned to be induced within three days of enrollment or to expectant management.

They averaged 37 weeks gestation, and fetal weight was estimated at an average of 3,700 grams.

The difference between the groups was approximately nine days additional gestation in the expectant management group along with a 287-g (10 oz.) higher birth weight.

In the expectant management group, 6.6% of neonates experienced shoulder dystocia, compared with 2.2% in the induced group …

Also significant was the difference in vaginal deliveries, which occurred in 58.7% of the induced births and 51.7% of expectant births.

Cesarean section was needed in 28% of the induction group and 31.7% of the expectant group.

Secondary outcomes — including clavicular fracture and brachial plexus injury — were similar between the two groups.

There were no serious or permanent brachial plexus injuries or deaths.

… The study demonstrated that prevention of macrosomia at birth can lead to safe birth outcomes …

The other aspect that has not been mentioned in this study is the importance of caring for women and providing advice that will help them to grow a baby who is appropriate for their pelvis, to maximise the chance of a normal birth. This is an essential aspect of the care that I provide to women.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Backache, sciatica and symphysis pubis pain in pregnancy

Lower back pain is common in late pregnancy. It is caused by the softening of the ligaments of the lower back and pelvis, the extra weight of the baby, and a change in your balance / centre of gravity. Strong abdominals muscles can help support your back. Sciatica can be alleviated through osteopathy, chiro, physio, reflexology, Bowen therapy and acupuncture.

To improve back pain, try alternating between standing and sitting. Wear supportive shoes with a sensible heel (not stilettos), and try lying tummy-down on a bean bag to take the weight off your back. Pelvic rocking can also ease the discomfort. When you need to pick something up, squat, rather than bend. Daily exercise will help too. Remember to sit on your sit bones, and place a stool or telephone book under your feet if they do not reach the ground. When you get out of bed, bend your knees and roll on to your side. Then push yourself up using your hand so that you are in a sitting position. To get into bed, climb onto the bed on your hands and knees. Lower your hips to your heels (kneeling) and then roll on to your side. Reflexology, osteopathy, acupuncture, massage or Bowen therapy can assist.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

“I’ve been told my baby is big”

and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Natural Twin Birth

I had a difficult delivery with my first baby, including posterior presentation, premature rupture of membranes, meconium staining, stalled labour, 18 hours of Syntocinon, a largely ineffectual epidural, a 4 hour second stage, and forceps delivery. My daughter had severe respiratory distress and was in the NICU for several days. It was a very tough introduction to parenthood and left me quite traumatised, especially the separation from my daughter. My husband and I decided that we would try for a homebirth if we had another baby, in the hope that a calmer environment would assist the birth process. When I fell pregnant again, we found a lovely homebirth midwife.

I started to show really early. At 8 weeks I was in maternity wear. I thought it was just because it was a second pregnancy, but a 9 week ultrasound showed TWO BABIES. We were completely shocked as there are no twins in my family. Twins of course meant that a homebirth was out of the question.

There followed many long months of argument with various obstetricians about our birth choices. We wanted as little intervention as possible. A standard twin delivery involves syntocinon (which I was very afraid of, after the previous experience), continuous monitoring (which I had hated with my first birth, as I felt chained to the bed) and an epidural prior to the second stage, in case positioning/version or a c-section is necessary to deliver the second twin. In my first birth, the epidural meant I had no pushing urge and seriously compromised my ability to deliver my daughter, hence the very prolonged second stage, so I did not want an epidural this time around, although I was prepared for Synto to be administered between the twins if labour did not re-establish. The hospital also wanted both twins delivered on the bed, which I did not agree with as I had found pushing in that position impossible the first time around. Our views were very challenging to the obstetricians and some were quite aggressive about it, although I must say the head OB was more reasonable and was prepared to admit that my refusal to consent to an epidural would be a “complete contraindication” to giving me one! Throughout this stage our midwife was a pillar of strength and information. She gave us the courage of our convictions and more than once came to the hospital to talk with the obstetricians on our behalf. Even so, the hospital was very unhappy with our birth preferences. It was a stressful time, helped somewhat by a Calmbirth ® course.

In the end all our arguments ended up being moot. At 33 weeks, I started to feel an ominous itching all over. Tests showed elevated bile salts and poor liver function results. I had obstetric cholestasis. Our midwife and the hospital agreed: the babies would need to be delivered by 37 weeks. And I knew that that early, an induction would almost certainly involve Syntocinon.

This was really difficult for me to accept. I was terribly afraid of the drug, and knew that Synto would mean continuous monitoring and therefore limit my movement, which I also feared. However, I knew that my fear would make the delivery more difficult and the pain worse. At this point the hospital dropped the bombshell that despite all their delivery rooms having deep birthing baths, I would not be allowed to use those or the shower if I had to have Synto, as they believe this risks pump damage to the Synto pump. Essentially this meant I was walking into a labour that was likely to be more painful, with less pain relief options. It was going to be down to Calmbirth ® alone, if I wanted to avoid drugs (and I did!).

I did a lot of Calmbirth ® practice from then on. But the Calmbirth ® visualisation exercises presupposed a normal delivery without intervention, and I found it very upsetting to listen to them. I hit on the idea of doing my own visualisations, of a medicalised induction process. After a few of these I was able to work through some of my fears.

On the day of the induction, we kissed our daughter goodbye at 5am and met our midwife at the hospital. Preliminary checks showed a Bishop score of 5, very promising for 36 weeks. The hospital midwife applied prostaglandin gel and sent us out to freedom. We had a lovely breakfast. I started to have sporadic contractions but nothing serious. We returned to the hospital 6 hours later. My cervix had ripened to 2cm, and the very cheerful OB was able to break the waters for twin 1 (our second daughter) at 3.45pm. No meconium staining! I dared to ask the OB how she was presenting. ANTERIOR, WOOHOO! I was very pleased with that.

Contractions came rather more strongly after that point, but were still sporadic. The felt very “knifey”, and our midwife explained this was from the prostaglandin gel. We held off on the Synto as long as possible, but at 6.25pm the drip was put up and contractions started in earnest. Continuous monitoring was in place, but via telemetry so I could have moved. Ironically, though, I didn’t feel the need to. I went deep into calm breathing and spent most of the labour sitting beside the bed on a fit ball, sometimes circling my hips but more often just breathing to ride the contractions with my husband stroking my back. Unlike my first labour, I had no real idea of when the next contraction was coming, and ended up doing my calm breathing (in for 4, out for 6) solidly for hours. I wasn’t afraid of the contractions. I could really feel them doing their work, and little twin 1 moving firm and fast down. I was determined to “get out of the way” of labour and with each contraction focused on opening up and not clenching against the pain. Our midwife was convinced things were going quickly and asked us when we thought we would be having the babies. I told her anything before midnight was a sucker bet! She said 11pm.

At 8.30pm, about 2 hours after I started having regular contractions, the pain was starting to get BIG. The OB did a cervix check – I was 5cm. I was very disheartened by this, but our midwife told me that the first 5cm was the hardest, and the very encouraging OB tried to convince me that it wasn’t all about centimetres and that my cervix felt promisingly thin and stretchy. In hindsight, even in my first labour I dilated from 5 to 10cm in under an hour, so I should have known what was coming – but I didn’t!

Throughout this time I was not making any noise. The hospital’s midwife didn’t seem to think I was in established labour, and threatened to up the Synto dose to make the contractions “strong and regular”, even though they were already sufficient to dilate my cervix 3cm in under 2 hours. I managed to insist “no. more. Synto!” She reserved judgement, but it might have been the adrenaline kick I needed, as by 9.15pm I was having enormous contractions every 2-3 minutes. I could feel them as a giant swelling band of pain stretching around my whole belly and stretching lower. At this point I started vocalising “ah, ah, ah” throughout contractions, to help me ride the pain and stop me clenching down. I remember saying “if this isn’t transition, I’m in trouble!” I didn’t believe it could be transition, though – not so early, not when my first birth had taken almost 3 days. Our midwife said she thought we would have babies by 10pm, and I didn’t believe her.

I needed to get off the fit ball and change position, and asked if I could get on all fours, although the idea of moving seemed impossible to imagine. The hospital midwife set up a crash mat and a nice beanbag for me to lean on. I leaned forward and within one contraction of moving had started making some amazing noises. Unlike my “ah ah ahs” they were completely involuntary. And then I could feel twin 1 crowning. I did not believe it had happened so quickly, and cried out “what’s happening?” Everyone still makes fun of me for this. She was born in only a couple of pushes at 9.25pm, and our midwife had to tell the hospital midwife to put her gloves on to catch her. Our beautiful daughter, with a lovely round head, pink skin and a great big yell! There is a photo of me still on all fours, with a blissed-out grin. I could not believe how easy and quick it had been. I got to hold her straight away, but contractions started up again quite quickly, and she went to her daddy for some skin to skin time.

At this point the obstetricians arrived – a registrar and resident. I wanted to stay on the floor, but the registrar managed to persuade me up on the bed to check twin 2′s position, as we knew he was breech. Contractions started up again within minutes and were really agonising now, as I had lost my Calmbirth focus and as the position (twin 2′s spine to mine) had that sort of posterior feeling to it. But within seconds I was again feeling the inexorable urge to push. The OB flicked twin 2′s feet out as he was in a squatting position, the midwife and OB flexed twin 2′s head by pushing on my stomach and with a few mighty pushes he was out too, at 9.39pm. Our son! He was handed to me but unlike J, had a bit of trouble breathing, and spent some time in the special care nursery. He was back to us almost before we knew it. I must say he had a very breech-looking head, which looked like a mighty frown, but he’s ever so handsome and cheerful now.

J weighed in at 2.98kg (I was really ticked off she could not stretch to the extra 20gm), and P weighed 3.06kg, excellent weights for 36 weekers, let alone twins!

After twin 2 was out, I lost all patience for the pain – rather a pity as the Synto kept getting ramped up to deliver the placentas and then to deal with my uterus which did not want to shrink back down. I ended up with a Synto drip all night. I tell people this birth was meant to help me deal with my fear of Synto once and for all.

Both babies had beautiful breastfeeds within an hour or two of birth, which sadly was not an omen of things to come for twin 1, but it was lovely.


Anyway, that was our birth. Twins born without any pain relief (not even hot water) or really any intervention other than the induction drugs, with 4 hours of contractions total and only about 2 of those active labour. It wasn’t the birth I had wanted but it was a wonderful experience and very healing after my first daughter’s birth. I am so proud of myself, and look back on the birth with amazed gratitude all the time.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Pregnancy Symptoms

I am often asked by women what they might expect to experience in early pregnancy. Here’s a guide below:

The symptoms below are some of the more common symptoms that women experience. It’s always best that women contact their eligible midwife or GP early in pregnancy to arrange for a pregnancy test and a dating scan if needed. Eligible midwives are able to order all of the necessary tests and scans and no referral is needed.

Late period
This is a common sign of pregnancy, and it is the one that it most often found first.

Morning sickness
Some women experience this, while other women do not. Some experience it as a later sign of pregnancy.

Sore, tingly breasts
This can also be one of the earlier signs of pregnancy and it can feel similar to premenstrual breast tenderness.

Tiredness
Tiredness is a common pregnancy symptom in early pregnancy.

Changed tastes or strange tastes and off-putting smells
Some women will have a strange taste in their mouth, like / dislike food that was previously disliked / liked, and may be put off by smells that were previously quite ok.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Do deceptive medical birth procedures de-humanize women?

Link

It was a rainy Wednesday late afternoon when pregnant Ana Cristina realized it was time to get ‘to know’ her unborn son João. She went to the Maternity Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros in hopes of an easy delivery. Despite the pain and restlessness, Ana stood quietly for four hours waiting for care. “It’s a scandal that they treat you badly,” she said. After waiting so many hours … Ana was informed that there were no vacancies and she should find another place to have her son.

… They would have make it across São Paulo city to go to another facility, the … famous teaching hospital in Santa Casa renowned in Brazil for its quality of health care …

… Many women face the happiness of their baby’s arrival with a fear of dying, along with the desire to care for their child and also to be cared for by their medical team. They have confidence in the hospital as the safest place to have a child. But they also carry the suspicion that their delivery can be abused by impunity and deceptive medical ethics by some medical teams.

Some women OB/GYN patients hear humiliating phrases from their medical providers during the process of childbirth, such as:

“Aren’t you too old to be having a baby?”
“If you don’t shut your mouth…”
“It didn’t hurt to make it, right?”
“You didn’t close your legs then, now deal with it!”

Often women patients do their best not to complain and to follow the orders of the medical team …

… André François, founder of ImageMagica, an organization that promotes education, culture and health through photography, has worked to document ‘humane medicine’ … In the process he has also documented medical abuse …

Can an unwanted caesarian be a form violence against women?

… vast differences in the health care system do exist. A universal healthcare system set to serve the poor in Brazil was widely established in 1988 offering free public healthcare for the first time to many in need. The system has suffered under many financial strains though with crumbling medical facilities and the theft of medical supplies in over crowed medical clinics that have had long lines with services that have turned critical needs patients away. But improvements in many levels of care have been made as some hospitals have been equipped with the newest medical equipment and trained medical staff.

François saw Brazil’s system of health care up close when he witnessed the case of one woman from the Amazon who urgently needed a caesarean section. But her journey to the doctor would not be an easy one. To get the medical attention she needed, she would have to face 12 hours of … pain as she traveled by motor canoe to the nearest medical facility. In many regions of the country “when a woman needs a caesarean section, she will usually die,” says André.

In spite of attempts to offer free health care to many of the underprivileged, a 2010 Brazilian study, “Women and Gender in Brazilian public and private spaces,” … 1 in 4 women in the country suffer today from some form of abuse during delivery.

But is there a difference between abuse and violence against women during delivery? What is the perception?

“Women with lower education, do not consider that the treatment they received was mistreatment and disrespect,” … “Through accounts of friends and people of the same social group, they listen that the hospital delivery is like that: it will hurt, you will scream, they will scream at you,” … “There is a perception of a picture that indeed is negative, but it is seen as normal. It is not even seen as mistreatment.”

In the public hospital in the town of Ceará in northeastern Brazil there is a sign on the wall alerting patients about their human rights. It tells them that they must demand decent public medical service. At the same hospital though, another sign outlines a very different picture. On another sign is a quote from Article 331 of Brazil’s Criminal Code, known as the ‘Desacato laws,’ that prevents freedom of speech for anyone who wants to speak out against injustice, including any patient who wants to talk about their medical care.

… Female patients who come from poor, rural and uneducated families often tend to be less acknowledged or counted as they become ‘objects’ in the hands of medical staff who can and do hold authority and power over them.

The World Health Organization recommends that the rate of cesarean section in a country should not exceed 15 percent. In Brazil the latest data for cesarean in most public hospitals is 35 percent. … an alarming 80 percent of private hospital [use] cesarean section commonly. When women are asked if they want a cesarean delivery about 70 percent of women patients say no …

Cesarean section, episiotomy, oxytocin and cosmetic vaginal surgery

… “most women go to birth without information.” Many are also convinced to accept cesarean section during labor while they are suffering from acute pain and unable to make the best decision. Women who are able to give birth ‘naturally’ are also most often submitted to episiotomy during childbirth …

… 90 percent of hospital births throughout Latin America use surgical procedures for episiotomy without any medical need or indication. Without consultation with their patients numerous doctors cut and sew the vagina to shrink it after childbirth and to ‘satisfy the husbands.’ This operation is known in Brazil as the ‘husband’s point.’ …

… The time a woman takes to complete labor in birth is another issue for medical teams who want to speed up the process. “There are reports that in some public hospitals, a woman should not be in labor from one shift to another, and all cases have to be ‘fully managed’ during the same shift,” …

In addition to episiotomy, some women receive doses of oxytocin to enhance uterine contractions – and consequently the pain – so their delivery with childbirth is faster. But is it safe? Distinct dangers to the mother with incorrect use of the drug can cause fatal fetal hypoxia, a condition that denies a woman’s baby of life saving oxygen during the process of childbirth …

Is there a solution to the problems?

Why do some medical teams mistreat patients in labor? Professional studies indicate that trivialization of social injustice, especially injustice against women, may be the cause. This can affect the entire society in Brazil, both male and female.

… Finding and supporting a good team of health professionals who will seek better quality health care for Brazil is the goal of photojournalist André François …

Since 2000 the Brazilian program called ‘Working with Traditional Midwives’ … has aimed to improve care for women with birth delivery at home. They also seek to raise awareness among health professionals to recognize midwives as important partners in the birth process for women.

As the definition of violence against women during childbirth can be wide and subject to many interpretations, so can the concept in the ‘humanization’ of childbirth. Numerous advocates who believe that babies who are born through a philosophy of ‘woman-centered childbirth’ are also beginning to see how natural and appropriate approaches to new technology with birthing can work together. The hope by many women’s advocates in Brazil is to see the rates of abuse during childbirth labor decrease sharply.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

An amazing homebirth story

Isabel is an amazing, strong woman who came to me for pregnancy care. She had planned to move overseas, and as you’ll read, her pregnancy came as a surprise. She planned a homebirth with a midwife overseas – but the story has a twist in it! We went about the pregnancy, preparing thoroughly for an active, natural and drug-free birth. I was thrilled to receive Isabel’s birth story, and she has kindly agreed to share it here.

Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home. Now it is my turn to write the story I have been so looking forward to… I hope I help inspire another mum-to-be to have the great confidence in her own ability and her body’s ability to birth her baby safely and naturally…love Isabel xx

Our beautiful birth story of baby Zachary by Isabel and Jed

It started in mid-April when I noticed an unusual change in my body. I pee-ed my pants when I sneezed. Even though I have a very weak bladder control and recurrent cystitis I had never done that before. I decided to get a urine test and after 4 weak positives I decided the product was defective and I needed to go see a real doctor tomorrow.
Half way through a busy day at work as a Veterinarian, caring for animals, it hit me that I might be pregnant and that we weren’t really ready for this big change in our lives. I broke down and cried. I left work early to go see the doctor. Jed met me at the clinic and we saw the doctor together. The doctor promptly told me, “My Dear, there isn’t such a thing as false positive results. Only false negative are possible. You ARE pregnant!”

I guess at that point both Jed and I had a lot of conflicting feelings. We had only just gotten married less than a month ago. We had a wedding dinner to attend in Malaysia followed by a honeymoon which required us to trek over 4000km up a mountain. At the same time it was such a big surprise and blessing to know that we were able to have a baby. We both set about sorting through our feelings and thoughts for a couple of weeks before letting the rest of the family and friends know about it.

It was a smooth pregnancy and we had amazing help and support from friends and family. We learnt so much from our lovely midwife, Melissa Maimann and our ante natal teacher, Julie Clarke. It was basically life changing. I had known I would have needed to hit the books for this but who would have thought I find so much conflicting information. It was hard making the right choices. It was doubly hard to not have my sisters around which I rely on so much for guidance. Jed was so good and read everything I told him to. I only had to chuck temper tantrums once a month. =)

In the end, I decided I wanted to have a home birth because I dislike being told what to do with regards to my body and I strongly dislike needles. I spent a lot of time visualising what my ideal birth/labour would be like and tried to get the support network I needed to achieve this dream. It wasn’t easy finding medical people to agree so in the end I realised it would probably just be Jed, Alicia and my mom helping me. I prayed to whoever was listening that everything would go smoothly and I that neither Zachary or I would not need medical help.

Fast forward about 9 months to December, my mucus plug came out throughout the day on the 13th with no signs of labour. So we decided to head over to the homeopath for back up help if needed to get the contractions going.
Almost a week later, on the 22nd of December my waters broke at 2am. It was such a surreal feeling as I sneezed and wet the bed. I was surprised at how wet the bed was and decided to stand up and this big gush of clear warm water ran down my legs. I then realised that my waters had broken and that I would be meeting my baby today.
I woke Jed up and told him the news. Since there were no signs of contractions once again I decided to take the homeopathic remedy and we both went back to sleep.

By 4am, I was uncomfortable enough to wake up and walk around. I emptied my bowels multiple times and drank lots of water and ate some fruit. At 5am I woke Jed up and told him to pump up the exercise ball and warm up the heat packs. By 6am, contractions were regular and about 15 minutes apart, Jed started filling up the bath tub. However, there was no hot water because the water heater had been turned off. So off he woke mom up to take over comforting me and went to boil many many pots of water.

I sat on the bathroom floor rocking on the exercise ball and constantly visualising a soft open cervix and my baby descending nicely. I breathed nicely through each contraction remember our Calmbirth classes.
Heat packs placed on the lower back and under the belly helped with the discomfort as well.
The exercise ball was good for sleeping and resting on between contractions. Around 7 o’clock the bath tub was finally ready, got in and felt lots better. Alicia came shortly after and took over from mom. She gave awesome back rubs and was such a grounding energy which was exactly what I needed to get things done. Things went quickly after that.

Jed got into the water around 8am and I knelt down with my arms wrapped around him. Contractions were about 5 minutes apart then and required a lot more attention. I kept reminding myself that each contraction meant one step closer to seeing Zachary. I felt him slowly pressing down on my cervix and my cervix dilating.
Vocalising helped during the contractions. Jed was a great help reminding me to breathe and not hold my breath.
He was like a rock I knew I could rely on. Did a few self vaginal exams and could feel Zachary’s head progressing downwards.
At about 8.20am I realised I was in transition, his head was crowning and I wasn’t fully dilated. Was upset and freaked out but Alicia reminded me to trust in my body. Took a deep breath and focused on opening my cervix up. A few minutes later I was ready to push, Zachary came out head first with a hand. I rested for a few seconds till the next contractions came and looked up at Jed and said “Are you ready? He is coming.” Jed caught Zachary Francis McKenna at 8.38am
We were both ecstatic and sat there admiring for a while. He started crying almost immediately and looked around at all of us.
Stood up and tried to birth placenta but couldn’t so I went back to the room. He started feeding soon after and I was enjoying his skin to skin contact. The doctor arrived soon after he advised us to clamp the cord and get the placenta out.
Jed was frantic and really wanted the placenta out because he was worried about bleeding. I was getting a little annoyed by his constant fussing. We clamped the cord and Jed cut it. The doctor applied gentle traction and got the placenta out. Finally we were left alone for some quiet time.

I would like to thank my lovely husband for supporting me through the pregnancy and birth and agreeing to a home birth and studying so hard.
I would also like to thank Melissa and Julie for their teachings which allowed me to have the confidence to do this, although neither of them endorsed free birthing they were not judgmental.

No amount of thank you can express my gratitude for having Alicia around to show me there were many options and that we need to take charge of our own births.
Many thanks to my Mom and Dad for allowing me to use their house. Last of all, Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Delivering better maternity care

Link

Despite countless inquiries, initiatives and ministerial pledges … maternity care remains one of the NHS’s problem areas …

In recent weeks there have been two significant pieces of evidence published that will help shape practice affecting the UK’s 800,000 births a year. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced new guidelines for the NHS in England and Wales on the circumstances in which mothers-to-be should be able to have a Caesarean-section delivery.

Meanwhile the landmark Birthplace study … sought to clarify the relative risks of having a baby at home, in hospital or in a birth centre run by midwives; the study found all settings carried a low level of risk. Both documents aim to advise maternity teams on how to give mothers and their babies the best possible experience.

… It is no wonder maternity services are under pressure … England has had a 22% increase in births over the past decade …

But the maternity workforce is not just short of midwives, the roundtable heard. Of those 800,000 annual births, 94% of them take place in hospitals where doctors are present along with midwives; the others, at home (2%) and in birth centres (4%), have midwives solely in charge. But the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) believes the 2,186 senior doctors working as consultants in that area of medicine is too few. It wants the NHS to boost numbers to 3,000-3,300.

Mothers-to-be would benefit because every hospital maternity unit would have a consultant on hand 24/7 and less experienced doctors would no longer be in charge overnight and at weekends …

… “the current system of maternity care is unsustainable. You have to reconfigure”. The participant meant that some maternity units should be closed – merged, in effect – so fewer, larger childbirth centres could offer mothers a better service, partly thanks to more specialist staff handling a greater number of deliveries concentrated in the same place.

It makes little sense for large urban areas to have separate maternity units just a few miles apart, a view confirmed for the speaker by seeing that sort of setup on a recent visit to Leeds and nearby towns.

Many health professionals support the concept of reorganisation. And the reconfiguration of neonatal care services in 2003, which led to fewer units dealing with sick babies but offering enhanced care, is a potential model to follow, another participant added. But there is a major obstacle to overcome first: … To close your core maternity service is a death trap as an MP. So that will not happen,” …

… simply creating fewer, but larger, hospital units is not the answer and there needs to be more midwife-led birth centres, either standalone units or situated beside hospitals, in case a mother needs urgent medical attention …

There was also a strong consensus that the huge proportion of births occurring in hospitals, 94%, is too high. While there was support for moving towards an equal split – 33% at home, 33% in birth centres and 33% in hospital – there was also a recognition that politics, entrenched attitudes and the tightest NHS budget in a generation means that will probably remain just an aspiration for the foreseeable future.

… In 2007, Maternity Matters promised women in England a choice of birth place, but the reality is that many still do not get that. One participant working on the NHS frontline said pressure on maternity services was so great in some places that midwives who usually help women to have home births are having to work, instead, on labour wards, thus depriving those seeking a home birth of that supposedly guaranteed right.

Similarly, surveys by the Healthcare Commission and its successor as the NHS regulator for England, the Care Quality Commission, have shown the promise to women of one-to-one care from a midwife during their labour is also not honoured for as many as a quarter of mothers-to-be, who are left alone and find it stressful …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Older mums in new age of parenting

Link

Almost a quarter of first-time Australian mothers are giving birth after the age of 35 … almost 6 per cent higher than the figure in 2000 …

… the number of mothers in the older age bracket would continue to grow for a range of reasons including lifestyle, economic factors and career choices.

“There’s a really strong tendency for women these days to get established in their careers or job and working for a period of time for their own self-fulfilment but also because of the economic circumstances,” …

… women now tended to have children over a shorter period – leaving less time between births – because they were older.

… the average maternal age in 2009 was 30, compared with 29 a decade earlier …

… older women faced a greater risk of complications during pregnancy including miscarriage, high blood pressure and diabetes …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Treatment Halves Preterm Birth Rate

Link

The risk of preterm birth and neonatal mortality and morbidity declined significantly in asymptomatic women with a … short cervix treated with vaginal progesterone …

The treatment was associated with a 40% to 50% reduction in the risk of preterm birth, a 43% reduction in total neonatal morbidity and mortality, and a 45% reduction in the frequency of low birth weight.

… “Our analysis provides compelling evidence that vaginal progesterone prevents preterm birth and reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a short cervix,” …

“Importantly, progesterone reduced early preterm birth. These immature babies are at the greatest risk for complications, death, and long-term disability. Progesterone also decreased a fraction of late preterm births, which are the most common preterm deliveries.”

… Progesterone has a key role in maintenance of pregnancy …

“Vaginal progesterone was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth <33 weeks of gestation in both women with a single gestation and no previous preterm birth, as well as in women with a single gestation and at least one previous spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation," ...

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Delayed Cord Clamping

Link

Delayed cord clamping refers to the practice of clamping the umbilical cord after it has stopped pulsating. The usual hospital practice is to clamp and cut the cord straight away, however new wisdom (practiced for many years by private midwives) challenged the usual practice.

Soon after a baby is born, the umbilical cord is clamped. But just how long those minutes should be, in between birth and clamping, is the subject of some controversy.

New research from Sweden shows that a delay in clamping the cord, by just a few minutes, results in improved iron levels for babies … iron is crucial for healthy development of the brain and central nervous system.

… For the babies whose clamping was delayed, there were fewer instances of anemia two days after birth. By four months of age they showed a 45 percent higher mean ferritin concentration … and a lower prevalence of iron deficiency than the babies who had been clamped early.

In the early clamping group, researchers noted that the degree of iron deficiency was moderate, rather than mild. All infants, from both groups, had similar weights and lengths as well as similar levels of hemoglobin.

Delayed cord clamping permits additional blood, including iron, to reach the neonate. The controversy comes in, however, because … later clamping can have a potential for … maternal hemorrhage …

In the event of excessive bleeding, the cord could be clamped and cut and Syntocinon administered to stem the bleeding. Delayed cord clamping is my usual practice. I do not generally cut or clamp the cord until after the placenta has been born.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Turbulent times

A lot has been happening in the world of homebirth and midwifery. Many will have read the articles about homebirth, freebirth, midwives and maternity care that are appearing in our papers on a daily basis.

I have not posted for a couple of weeks now, for three main reasons: one I have been really busy with my practice which has not been this busy for about two years. Second, I attended the Australian College of Midwives National Conference – the ACM worked really hard to deliver an excellent conference that was appreciated by all. I had the fantastic opportunity to meet midwives from around Australia and share ideas, discuss practice and talk birthy things. I was pleased that the conference was in Sydney, because as those of you who know me will know, in my non-midwifery life I rescue and care for injured and orphaned native birds, and so I was able to make a trip home most days of the conference to feed everyone at home. They were hungry but they all survived! I digress. The third reason for not posting was that the recent issues have made me re-assess things like responsibility, accountability, safety, choice, control, autonomy, beneficence, informed decision-making and many other issues. I have no answers to report. Just lots of reflection.

Midwifery and maternity care are going through turbulent times and as professionals and organisations, I feel that we have done a major disservice to women that they feel safer birthing at home – with or without a registered midwife – in the presence of risk factors – because they so strongly believe that the hospital system will not enable them to birth in the manner of their choosing. It is a sad reflection on the health system and the professionals who work within it. Women who cannot access midwifery care because they are planning a VBAC. Women who are told that if they insist on birthing vaginally with twins, they must accept continuous monitoring, induction, epidural and birth in stirrups for twin two. Women whose only option is to birth in a hospital that is two hours from their home. We have all heard the stories.

My biggest disappointment is the lack of midwife admitting rights. We are one year into the maternity reforms on November 1 this year. We have eligible midwives with Medicare provider numbers, ordering tests and working with doctors to provide safe care to women and babies – yet we cannot access hospitals to provide this care. I well understand that there are a lot of hurdles to be overcome with midwife admitting rights, and life has taught me that nothing in life is impossible.

The release of the homebirth position statement – which I fully support as an evidence-based and safe way to provide care – combined with the lack of midwife admitting rights, is disastrous for women and midwives. Higher risk women are forced into a position of birthing in hospital without their midwife if the midwife complies with the position statement but has no admitting rights – otr else freebirthing, potentially with disastrous consequences. Overnight, this change occurred and women are fuming.

It is impossible to believe, but an eligible midwife who crosses all the “T”s and dots all the “I”s will suffer incredibly in terms of restriction of clientele, however if she were to remove her name from the register – something that I understand is very easy to do – she may do just as she pleases with no accountability, regulation or practice standards. Midwives are placed in the untenable situation of a dwindling practice, or unregistering and having a flourishing practice. Until admitting rights are in place, midwives will have no place to birth with their higher-risk clients. This situation does not see the Government supporting midwives or women. It is creating a disaster.

The various politics of homebirth and midwifery has created an enormous rift between midwives. It seems that there are the bunch who have elected to become eligible, forge ahead with collaborative arrangements, push for admitting rights and accept the increased regulation that is upon us as our profession matures. The other group opposes the increased regulation and restriction of choice, supports midwife- (or non-midwife)-attended homebirth for any woman who wants it and really wants things to just go back to how they used to be, before insurance became mandatory. Many midwives sit comfortable in the middle of this debate. It is sad to watch such division and animosity amongst midwives. We seem to lack a capacity of saying, “We don’t share each other’s vision and we have made different choices, but we are midwives and we will support each other”. As one midwife said to me, “We are each doing the best we can for the women we care for and we’re making the best of a rotten situation”.

I know 2012 will be better than 2011. Who knows? Maybe it’ll be an historic year where for the very first time, women will birth on their own terms, with their chosen midwife, at home or in hospital. I wonder how many women will insist on homebirth in spite of significant risks, if they are able to birth in hospital with their own midwife and in the manner of their choosing.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Natural birth in hospital?

Here are some ideas to birth naturally in hospital:

Read, read, read. Books, websites, any written info from your care provider … read it all. You also need to know the difference between facts presented to you in an honest and unbiased way, and facts that are being filtered through hospital policy. This is where women benefit from having a private midwife by their side.

For example, “Some risks rise slightly when a woman has high blood pressure. I am uncomfortable with letting your pregnancy continue with high blood pressure because of the risks to the baby and to you if something happens” is an honest and factual statement. You have the right to accept the risks and refuse induction. However, some women hear “I’m going to induce you today because if we don’t do this now, there is a good chance your baby will not make it”. This statement is dishonest, using a woman’s fears and her maternal instinct to encourage her to accept intervention. There is also no discussion of alternative options. Informed consent requires that women are presented with options so that they can make the best decision for them, in their situation.

Be assertive As with most human relationships, a great deal can be resolved with a calm, respectful and firm manner. Know what you want and why you want it. Engage a private midwife to assist you with obtaining relevant and impartial information.

Listen. If you are choosing to use a hospital and an obstetrician for your birth, then you acknowledge that their presence, education and experience have some value. Your wishes are important but be willing to listen even when what’s being said is really not what you want to hear. You must also acknowledge that an obstetrician is trained in all things that go wrong, and they are on the look-out for any sign of things going wrong. Midwives, on the other hand, will promote normalcy and assist your pregnancy and birth to remain normal. These differing philosophies do result in big differences in intervention rates.

Be Flexible. Understand that sometimes things don’t go the way we had planned. There might be some occasions where you’ll be happy to accommodate the hospital policy, and other times when you’ll want to stand your ground.

Ultimately, it is true that the most important aspect of birth is safety and a healthy mother and baby. But that doesn’t mean the other aspects are unimportant, and I firmly believe you can have a great birth – and a safe birth – in any location.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Choosing Your Midwife

Midwives are qualified and educated to care for women throughout normal pregnancy, birth and the postnatal / newborn period. Midwives are also known as the experts in natural birth, attending water births, home births and hospital births. Finding the best midwife for your needs can be a challenging task, but it’s one of the most important decisions a family will make when they decide to work with a midwife. The midwife’s knowledge, skill and experience are key to a safe and satisfying pregnancy and birth experience.

When engaging the services of a private midwife, most people will make contact by phone call or email, and then arrange for an initial consultation. At the consultation, the midwife and family interview each other to explore whether the relationship feels right for them and meets their needs. Midwives will ask about the woman’s health history, her care needs, her previous birth experiences, her attitudes and beliefs about birth and her expectations of her midwife.

What sorts of questions can women ask their midwife? Well, there are lots of questions you could ask and I’ve included some below.

Be sure to ask about qualifications and experience, including whether your midwife is an eligible midwife. You are able to claim medicare benefits if your eligible midwife has a collaborative arrangement and is able to access obstetric care for you if it becomes necessary. If you are told, “I have three years of experience” ask where that experience was obtained – in a hospital? Private practice? If in private practice, how many births does she attend a year? 2? 20? Generally for private practice, the more experience that is gained, the better: when a midwife works in private practice, she works alone and needs a good level of skill, experience and judgment to practice safely. Experience is always the best teacher.

Ask your midwife about her relationships with hospitals and doctors. This will provide insight into your midwife’s ability to negotiate and communicate.

Many women ask for references but this can be tricky as they would come from former clients of your midwife. This of course brings up issues of confidentiality, and it is against the Public Health Act for midwives to place testimonials on their websites. You can ask your midwife if she has any former clients who would be prepared to speak with you, but be mindful of confidentiality processes and women’s rights to privacy. What your midwife can do, is to provide a summary of the feedback that she has received from her clients. This will tell you that your midwife is engaged in quality assurance processes and would also provide a way of reading feedback from previous clients.

Ask your midwife what her service includes and does not include. Also ask about fees, back-up arrangements and obstetric back-up arrangements.

Are there any questions families should not ask their midwife? Generally, interviews with midwives can be approached as a job interview. Questions that are appropriate in a job interview would be fine to ask your prospective midwife. Questions regarding religion, marital status, age, previous birth experiences, previous terminations and other personal questions ought not be asked.

Finally, it’s really important that you feel comfortable with your midwife and that you feel that you trust her. Reliability is important, as is trust, respect and honesty.

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

Charging women for non-medical caesareans?

Link

The health minister has said that women in Northern Ireland who choose to have a Caesarean for non-medical reasons may have to pay for the operation.

Edwin Poots is launching a consultation on a review of maternity services.

Women at low risk will be encouraged to consider having their baby in a midwife-led unit or at home, if appropriate.

Around 30% of deliveries are by Caesarean section – the highest level in the UK and Ireland.

… giving birth was a natural process and superb assistance was available to help women through the delivery.

“It costs several thousand pounds more for a Caesarean section so there are savings to be made,” …

“… what we want to encourage, is more people to give birth naturally because it has better outcomes for the mother and the baby.

… “We want to ensure that people take the natural choice where they can and to have that back up where they need Caesarean section to take place.”

… At present, women who elect to go private to have a Caesarean on non-medical grounds pay for their pre and post-natal care.

But the cost of the delivery is met by the health service.

… women will be encouraged to have their baby in a midwife led unit

“If you want to go down that route, if you want to pay for it, it is totally up to yourself, but I don’t feel that we the public in Northern Ireland should be paying additional money for people to have the choice.”

The minister said he expected to see a “considerable” number of midwifery units being established.

“A lot of them would be set up in association with the main maternity unit, so they would be on the same site as existing hospitals,” …

“Women would be giving birth totally with the midwives but there would be a fallback position of having an obstetrician nearby if things do not work out.”

Breedagh Hughes from the Royal College of Midwives said the focus was on trying to “normalise” child birth.

… “One of the things we hope will come out in the review will be asking trusts to look at … the reasons for the Caesarean sections and to focus on trying to prevent women from having that first Caesarean section, which very often leads to the old adage – ‘once a section always a section’.”

She said a “fear” of child birth stopped many women from choosing a natural birth.

“When one in every three women gives birth by Caesarean section, you lose that critical mass of people who know what it is like to give birth normally, and women are losing confidence in their own body’s ability to give birth,” she said.

Ms Hughes also welcomed proposals to shift the focus to midwife led care.

“I think if women are given the opportunity to get to know and trust their midwife and to trust their own bodies, we’re more likely to see women saying, ‘OK, this is what nature intended me for and this is what I’m going to do’,” …

Visit my website to explore birthing services

Ob-gyn guidelines often based on opinion, weak data

I am not sure of the intent of the article below as although guidelines may not be based on good, solid evidence (which is often in scarce supply), that is no reason for experts not to work together to create guidelines that are based on the best available evidence and experience. If we did not have guidelines for clinical practice, we would not have a standard to inform best clinical care. The guidelines that are created may well turn out to be ineffective, inappropriate or otherwise unworkable, and on that basis they would be reviewed and changed if necessary.

Link

Solid evidence is often missing from the practice guidelines used by obstetrician-gynecologists …

Less than a third of the recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) are based on gold-standard scientific experiments …

The rest are based on … expert opinion, which is subject to personal biases …

“That is often the fall-back when there is no data,” … expert opinion is helpful in pointing out what we don’t know, but might not always translate into what’s best for patients.

… Guidelines help doctors keep up with the latest developments in their fields and are widely perceived as a recipe for good patient care.

But there is often surprisingly little hard data behind them …

… guidelines panels conduct extensive reviews of the medical literature to find all relevant evidence and also take care to exclude experts with financial conflicts of interest.

… those are two key elements in creating good guidelines.

… “For many of the recommendations there simply is not enough data, or it is disputed,” … “So there has to be a role for expert opinion.”

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

I’m pregnant and I have private health insurance. What are my options?

Great question! There are a few options available to you as a private patient, as well as all of the options that are available to public patients. Specifically, the private options are either a private midwife, or a private obstetrician.

Private midwife
To receive care from a private midwife and obtain Medicare benefits, your midwife will need to work with an obstetrician or a doctor who provides obstetric services. Some private midwives are able to provide labour and birth care in hospital settings, while others are only able to provide labour and birth care at home. All private midwives can provide pregnancy and postnatal care. Hospital options may include private or public hospitals; it’s best to ask your midwife which hospitals she attends births at.

Private obstetrician
Private obstetricians can provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care, although birth care would also be provided by hospital midwives who may be unknown to you until birth. Private obstetricians deliver babies at public and private hospitals.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Are home births safe?

Link

Jon Barrett is accustomed to dealing with anxious mothers-to-be. As chief of maternal-fetal medicine at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, one of the main concerns he hears from patients involves unnecessary medical interventions during delivery.

He acknowledges that the rate of Caesarian sections and episiotomies is far too high … But he’s more unnerved by what that phenomenon appears to be triggering: a surge in demand for home births.

Barrett’s concerns about home births stem from experience. Between 1990 and 1992, he was part of an obstetric “flying squad” in Newcastle, England. His job was to travel, by ambulance, to the bedsides of women whose home births had gone awry …

Two incidents are particularly vivid. The first occurred in winter. Navigating the ambulance through snowy laneways, Barrett’s team arrived to find two midwives frantically working over an unconscious woman. She was in shock and hemorrhaging badly. “I’ve never seen so much blood in my life.” She survived, but only after a massive blood transfusion in hospital. The second woman developed pre-eclampsia, which caused seizures, and went into cardiac arrest as his ambulance pulled up. His team was able to restart her heart and intubate her before rushing her to hospital. She also survived. He says both conditions were unpredictable and could have occurred anywhere, “But I know they would have come less close to dying if it would have happened in hospital.”

Unlike some of his colleagues on the squad who witnessed fetal deaths during home births, if Barrett’s memories were reduced to pure data in a typical study, they’d be unremarkable. That’s because most home birth data measures deaths, not complications, and his patients survived. “If you want a retrospective study, there’s no maternal mortality there . . . and so is that safe? No, it’s just bloody lucky.”

The question of how best to measure home birth safety has long plagued researchers … what is counted — mortality rates for mothers and babies during childbirth — offers little insight on the maternal side because … maternal deaths from childbirth are rare … But stories like Barrett’s suggest the numbers don’t tell the whole story. In his view, the bottom line should be obvious: “Sooner or later you’re going to get a disaster because that’s the nature of obstetrics.” He adds, “It’s very rare that it will happen, but it’s got to happen more in home birth.”

That assertion is at the heart of a furious debate in the birthing community. Mothers who choose to give birth at home often cite research showing there are fewer medical interventions and no increased risk. But in the past year, a new study has emerged that contradicts this. It shows that home births are associated with significantly higher death rates for babies. If correct, the rights of women to control their own bodies and birth experience would seem to conflict with the best interests of their children.

When the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) released the now-controversial “Wax Study” last summer, it created the medical equivalent of the Rift Valley amongst birthing experts … [It] confirmed significant benefits to mothers who gave birth at home, including less hemorrhaging, vaginal tearing and epidural use, and fewer infections and Caesarean sections. Unfortunately, these benefits seemed to occur at the baby’s expense: … the report showed that neonatal deaths (defined as deaths within 28 days of birth) were two to three times higher for home births. Clearly, no woman who chooses home birth believes she’s jeopardizing her baby’s health, but the study suggested such faith in the safety of home birthing is undermined by medical evidence. For those who accepted Wax’s results, the benefits of giving birth at home suddenly appeared trivial compared to the risks.

In many ways, Wax’s study was groundbreaking … a meta-analysis, combined and re-analyzed existing studies, in order to create a bigger sample and, ideally, a more accurate result. He looked at more than 230 peer-reviewed papers published between 1950 and 2009, and selected a dozen that compared planned home births with planned hospital births by low-risk mothers in industrialized countries (Australia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada and the U.S.). The study’s vast scope—it encompassed more than 500,000 deliveries—boosted its credibility. As one doctor put it, “half a million births cuts out a lot of noise.”

Perhaps, but the momentary silence was followed by an outraged roar from home birth supporters, including some whose research showed very different results. “The Wax study is full of mathematical errors,” says Patti Janssen, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Population and Public Health, and lead author of a 2009 cohort study that showed home births to be as safe as hospital births, for women and babies. “The design was wrong, and the calculations were wrong, and it just has to be thrown out the window.” …

… Wax initially defended his work, but then began refusing interviews … As a flood of letters poured into the AJOG … the publication convened an independent panel to examine the main complaints. In April, it published a sample of those letters, along with a detailed response from Wax. It also released the panel’s conclusion that the study did not need to be retracted.

But the debate has continued, and gained force, in the wake of a second study … out of the Netherlands … it concluded that babies born to low-risk women, under a midwife’s care (in hospital or at home) are more than twice as likely to die as those born to high-risk women who give birth under an obstetrician.

Although these results were specific to Holland, and may indicate problems in the way the Dutch system categorizes women as “low- risk,” the study nevertheless provided fresh ammunition to those who believe babies are best delivered by obstetricians, and added fuel to the home birth debate. More letters began to fly, adding to the stack of seemingly contradictory information through which pregnant women are required to sift in order to make an educated decision.

Nathalie Waite could be the poster mother for the perfect home birth. Waite’s considerations were largely pragmatic when she decided, two years ago, that her fifth baby should be born at home. She had four children attending three different Toronto schools, no nanny, and wanted her delivery to disrupt life as little as possible. It wasn’t a decision she made lightly. Her husband was nervous, but Waite’s midwife reassured them both. They lived near a hospital. Two attending midwives would be in close contact with Waite’s obstetrician and, at the slightest sign of trouble, an ambulance would be in her driveway. Most importantly, Waite knew her own body. She’d had four hospital births. During the two deliveries in which she’d fought … for a natural birth she’d experienced far less pain …

Had she known what a home delivery would be like, Waite says none of her children would have been born in hospital. “It was purely beautiful.” … “it just felt so natural. It just felt right.”

This is why home births are special, says Anne Wilson, president of the Canadian Association of Midwives. “It’s a non-medicalized environment where birth becomes a normal part of your family life.” …

… there is no debating the fact that home births have lower intervention rates. And everyone, on both sides of the argument, agrees that hospital intervention rates are too high …

His daughter’s birth, in Kingston, Ont., in 2007, was such “a spectacular experience” he and his wife decided to repeat it at their new home in Guelph this year. Unfortunately, their son was born with fluid in his lungs, which concerned their midwife enough to send them to hospital. Everything they experienced from that point on, Shaw says, reinforced their preconceptions. Their son was given blood tests, a chest X-ray and an IV for a condition Shaw believes would have cleared up on its own after several hours. They had to fight for permission to breastfeed … and, he says, when the pediatrician went home without leaving instructions for release, their son remained in an incubator for an additional 15 hours. “Our rights were completely taken away and doctors more or less said this is what we’re going to do to your baby and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

… Shaw’s mistrust of the medical system runs deep. “I’ve hung around scientists enough to be skeptical of everything I’m told,” … He and his wife refused vitamin K and erythromycin ointment for their children, two treatments hospitals and midwives administer as standard protocol after birth. (Vitamin K ensures the baby’s blood can clot until it starts making the vitamin itself, and erythromycin is an antibiotic that protects against infections from the birth canal that can cause blindness.) …

In many ways, Shaw and Waite represent opposite ends of the home birth spectrum. Certainly Shaw’s rejection of many of the fundamental tenets of modern medicine contrasts with Waite’s attempt to adapt its benefits to a home birth. But they share an important piece of common ground: both chose to deliver their babies with the help of a midwife.

Freebirthers, women who deliver without assistance (and often shun prenatal care), represent the smallest sub-section of home birth mothers, and aren’t included in studies on home birth safety. Among their most famous advocates is Janet Fraser, an Australian woman who made famous the term “birth rape” to describe an emergency episiotomy during the birth of her son. “I don’t care if you don’t like the word or the idea, it’s real so get used to it,” … In 2009, Fraser’s baby daughter died after five days of home labour. She continues to advocate for freebirth.

Freebirthers make most midwives nervous and they horrify obstetricians. Freebirth is the equivalent of playing “Russian roulette with your child,” says André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). “You don’t play with a child’s life. Especially not where [health care is] free.” That said, the SOGC does believe that midwife-assisted home births are “a reasonable alternative for low-risk women.”

Yet, asked if he would consider home birth a reasonable option for his family, Lalonde is unequivocal. “No. Definitely not.” He falls back on experience for explanation. “I’ve participated in over 6,000 deliveries in my career and I know that everything looks very fine and suddenly disaster strikes.”

That conflict between medical experience and faith in a woman’s body to deliver naturally lies at the heart of the home birth debate. But is the concept of natural childbirth in danger of being romanticized? … There is a documentary, popular amongst home birth advocates, entitled Orgasmic Birth; its website invites viewers to “witness the passion as birth is revealed as an integral part of woman’s sexuality and a neglected human right.” Ami McKay’s award-winning novel The Birth House makes a compelling case for home births to a more mainstream audience. In it, the doctor is portrayed as a condescending, patriarchal figure who knocks out his protesting patients with ether, then yanks out their babies. In contrast, the methods of midwife Dora Rare are equally suspect (think mandrake root and witchcraft) yet portrayed with exquisite humanity …

That kind of experience need not be exclusive to home birth, insist obstetricians. “We should be working to make the environment of the hospital conducive to the home birth experience, rather than having more deliveries at home,” Sunnybrook’s Barrett says.

But midwives like Anne Wilson maintain there’s nothing to equal the experience of a home birth. “If I am delivering a baby in the hospital, you’re a guest in my house. If I’m delivering a baby at home, I’m a guest in your house. And there’s quite a lot of psychological difference there.” Wilson hopes the demand for home births will continue to rise in Canada … she believes that all low-risk women, including those who choose to give birth in hospital, should deliver with a midwife.

That’s the system adopted by the Netherlands — and the Evers study suggests it’s failing dramatically …

“I don’t think it’s that important to debate whether [homebirth is] safe, safer or not safe. I think it’s very important to debate how we can make home birth safer because women are going to do it anyway.”

In the United States, one way to improve safety is by improving midwifery. Training and regulations are a patchwork across the country; in some states, midwives aren’t even required to finish high school. In that respect, the U.S. lags many industrialized countries, including Canada. It’s one of the reasons Canadian midwives bristle at comparisons.

In contrast to the U.S., {Canadian] midwives are university educated, highly regulated, and well-trained in emergency skills …

Obstetricians and midwives are in broad agreement on the key measures necessary to reduce risk during home birth. They are the steps taken by Waite: ideally, a low-risk woman would deliver with the assistance of two highly trained midwives who are in close contact with an obstetrician at a nearby hospital. When those steps are put in place, Wald­man says, “it can work almost as safely as the hospital situation.”

Is “almost” good enough when you’re talking about the survival of a newborn baby? Although he describes himself as a long-time supporter of midwives and birthing centres, the ACOG’s Waldman echoes his Canadian counterpart, Lalonde, when he says he wouldn’t want a home birth for his wife or daughter. “The intrapartum loss rate has got to be higher at home, it’s just intuitional for anybody who does this work. How big that number is could be debated.”

And is being debated. As larger and larger studies are undertaken, Sunnybrook’s Jon Barrett believes the data will start to show consistently higher risks associated with home births …

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

‘Illegal’ midwives: Is Australia destined for the same?

An article from Canada explains their midwifery system which includes unregistered midwives.

Ann (not her real name) operates outside the regulated profession, living life on the edge, exposed to a constant threat of legal action should births under her watch go wrong.

She knows five other unregistered midwives working in Montreal’s so-called “parallel network.” They typically help women who are unable to secure legal midwife services to have their babies at home or in a birthing centre, and who reject the official alternative of giving birth in a hospital

There is no shortage of demand for their services. With just 140 registered midwives able to practise across the entire province, the parallel network fills a yawning gap in the market. Much of the birthing industry – obstetricians, gynecologists and some registered midwives – would consider its covert practitioners to be charlatans. But, to women determined to choose how, where and with whom they give birth, they are valued allies.

Take Teprine Baldo, who had her eldest child, now 2 years old, at home with the help of what she calls a “midwife recognized by the community. I prefer the term. It’s more respectful. People tend to talk about illegal midwives the way they used to talk about witches,” she says.

There has been one prosecution over the years. In 2006, Diane Boutin was forced to transfer a woman in her care to … Hospital after complications set in mid-labour. Following an emergency Caesarean, the gynecologist on duty filed a complaint with the provincial order of midwives … which went on to successfully pursue Boutin for illegal practice under Quebec’s professional code, a felony carrying a fine of up to $6,000.

In the days before the profession began its slow march toward legalization in the 1990s, all midwives were renegades operating outside the system, some entirely self-taught, others holding foreign qualifications unrecognized by the province. But, times have changed and as the now-regulated profession wages a PR battle for public acceptance, pushing against residual resistance from an often skeptical medical establishment, it cannot be seen to condone illegal practice.

parents are likely to be the biggest losers when things go wrong, should newborns be left damaged as a direct result of negligence or malpractice.

It’s a hugely sensitive issue. Sinclair Harris, a registered midwife at Pointe Claire birthing centre, is sympathetic with her unregistered counterparts. But, she says, “You need an understanding of pathology, of the things that can go wrong, if you are to be available for the mainstream public.”

Women like Baldo are incredulous that they are still being denied that choice, outraged that the black market midwives helping the most determined to exercise basic rights over their bodies risk prosecution.

“It’s like we’re being told we can’t birth properly,” she says. “I’m not against hospitals. My issue is that there’s often no alternative.”

At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife

Seeking closure after a traumatic first birth in hospital, Caroline Gauthier gave birth to her second child at home with an unregistered midwife.

She was living in British Columbia, pregnant with her first child, when her dream of an intervention-free home birth went awry. Transferred to hospital by her registered midwife after her cervix was slow to dilate, she was administered hormones to speed up labour.

“I was like Jabba the Hutt, hooked up to the monitor,” she says. Staff forgot to turn on the oxygen supply to her mask, leaving her flailing about for help. When her baby finally arrived after a traumatic final push, she was barely able to touch his foot before he was whisked away.

Pregnant with her second child in Quebec, she immediately set about trying to secure a midwife at the Du Boisé birthing centre in the Laurentians. However, her place was contingent on her delivering at the birthing centre.

But Gauthier had already set her heart on giving birth at home. At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife. Again, her labour was long, but she sat out the hours in the bath and in bed. “This time, I had a midwife who didn’t have a system to please,” she says.

After three days of labour, the baby’s head popped out while she was on her way to the bath. “In less than two minutes, the whole body was out,” she says. He didn’t immediately cry, “but nobody made a circus out of it.”

Vindicated by her second experience, she is now a fierce advocate of women’s right to give birth as they choose. “I was given the time my baby needed,” she says. “My neighbours tell me I was so brave delivering at home. My reaction is: ‘My God, you’re brave giving birth in hospital. You’re putting yourself at their mercy. You don’t know what you’re getting yourself into.’ ”

The midwife: With no insurance, every new client is a gamble

On D-day, Ann arrives on the scene with a case containing oxygen supplies, a heart monitor, synthetic oxytocin, herbal remedies, suture material and local anesthetic for stitches.

She has been practising midwifery in the parallel network for more than 10 years. Clients find their way to her by word of mouth. She has a busy schedule year round, attending to three or four clients a month.

Clients are generally women who have been unable to find a registered midwife …

Occasionally she has transferred cases to hospital …

With no insurance, every new client is a gamble. “My insurance is the trust I develop with the parents. I trust people who have the deep belief that it’s best for the birth of the baby. Nobody can be sure of the end result.”

There is a contract, though she is clearly ill at ease with cold legal realities. “It’s about ensuring the parents understand what they’re getting into,” she says. “But, sometimes I forget to get people to sign. We’re on another level. It’s not about business.”

She describes herself as a self-taught midwife eschewing a system where midwives are “too stressed, too watched.” …

The four-year university program didn’t appeal to her. “I thought it was too focused on pathology. There was no alternative medicine. No spirituality,” she says. “It’s as if only one kind of intelligence is allowed. Forget emotional intelligence.”

Midwifery was legalized in Quebec in 1999, following a five-year pilot project. Home births with the assistance of registered midwives have only been allowed since 2005.

In a 2007 Statistics Canada report, 71 per cent of women who had delivered with a registered midwife rated the experience as “very positive,” compared with 53 per cent of women who had delivered in a hospital.

According to research … midwife-assisted home births are associated with lower rates of obstetric interventions and adverse outcomes. Newborns born at home were also less likely to require resuscitation or oxygen therapy.

Australia is heading for a similar situation, brought about by a few factors: the recent position statement on homebirth which effectively prevents midwives from attending high risk births at home, the lack of visiting rights to enable most midwives to birth in hospital with their clients, dissatisfaction with current hospital-based maternity services that are seen by women to be impersonal and highly interventionist, and a differing view of things such as risk and responsibility. Although some midwives are making the choice to unregister and continue to attend births, they do face the same issues that are explained in the article.

Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

NZ Midwifery system hailed as world leader

Link

New Zealand midwives provide the best care in the world for mothers and newborn babies.

That’s how international delegates attending a major international conference on midwifery and maternity care have described New Zealand’s midwifery led maternity model of care.

They acknowledged that New Zealand is leading the world in setting the standards for midwifery practice and professionalism, citing midwifery education, regulation and training, and strong collaboration with other health professionals.

… The report highlighted “midwifery services as the focus of global efforts to realise the best possible care during pregnancy and childbirth for every woman and her newborn”.

… New Zealand is alone in achieving a high level of access to midwives for all women and their babies.

The focus of the more than 3000 participants attending the 29th Triennial Congress of the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) in South Africa was to further develop strategies to reduce maternal and infant mortality by strengthening midwifery worldwide.

The consensus world wide is that an educated well supported midwifery workforce will improve outcomes for mothers and babies.

… New Zealand is the only country that already conforms 100% to these new standards and competencies, and delegates from many countries are looking to us to help them with implementing similar models of midwifery care.

Several international agencies including the United Nations Population Fund, the World Health Organisation and the International Federation of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians pledged to support the implementation of the ICM standards.

… New Zealand midwives become degree qualified through three-year (equivalent to four years, as each academic year is 47 weeks long) Bachelor of Midwifery programmes. They are professionally accountable as they are regulated by the Midwifery Council, set up under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act of 2003.

“The NZCOM is New Zealand’s professional organisation for midwives and we provide ongoing educational development for midwives after they are registered. We also promote ‘Standards of Practice’ through a variety of mechanisms including the Midwifery Standards Review process,” …

While there are some very positive aspects of the New Zealand maternity system, there are also a few concerning areas, such as the huge caseloads that NZ midwives are required to take, which can impact on continuity of care and in the time that is available to each woman. That aside, they have a great system where women are supported to birth at home or in hospital, and midwives are able to access any hospital of their choosing. Hence they can provide complete continuity of care, 100% funded by the government so women are not out-of-pocket. In Australia, the gates to private practice have opened and private practice is encouraged. Eligible midwives are able to provide medicare-funded care, but there is still an out-of-pocket cost to women, as there is with any private health service. Visiting rights have not yet been established, but some private midwives have negotiated ways of birthing in hospital with their clients. And of course homebirth remains an option. Hopefully in years to come, Australia will also be hailed as a midwifery world leader.

Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

“I’ve been told my baby is big”

and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience.

Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

Dutch abandon home birth

A recent article informs us that:

RISK OF DEATH INDUCES DUTCH WOMEN TO ABANDON HOME BIRTHS

It goes on to say that in the last 10 years, the percentage of Dutch women who are giving birth in hospitals has risen from 37% to 75%. They state that reasons for this include:

  • concern at the disproportionally high baby death rate in home birth
  • the rising popularity of epidurals, a pain relief option in labour which is only available in hospitals.
  • The Dutch system of home births has been promoted as one which other countries should emulate, including New Zealand. However, last year a large study found that the perinatal death rate was greater in low risk women who were cared for by midwives than in higher risk women who were cared for by obstetricians. The researchers concluded that the Dutch system of risk selection is not as effective as was once thought.

    I have read the study that has been referred to above. The study concludes that:

    The main finding of this study is that the Dutch obstetric system that is based on risk selection and obstetric care at two levels may not be as effective as was once thought. The Dutch obstetric system itself possibly contributes to the high perinatal mortality compared with most European countries. We found that delivery-related perinatal death was significantly higher among low risk pregnancies in midwife supervised primary care than among high risk pregnancies in obstetrician supervised secondary care.

    The Dutch system relies on a risk assessment. Women are either in primary care or secondary care. Women who are in primary care have midwifery care and they have the option of home birth or hospital birth. The Netherlands currently has a 22% homebirth rate. Women with risk-associated pregnancies have obstetric (secondary) care and give birth in hospital. They might have issues such as high blood pressure, diabetes, twins, a previous caesarean and so on. Overall, 49.5% women remain in primary care at the start oaf labour, and 35% women remain in primary care throughout labour and birth. 65% women either start their pregnancy in secondary care or are transferred to secondary care at some stage in their pregnancy or labour. It is a system that has worked well for many years.

    However, the study has found that the intrapartum (labour and birth) death rate among term babies without congenital malformations (birth defects) was as follows:

  • For babies who started labour in primary (midwifery) care: 0.96/1000
  • For babies who started labour in secondary (obstetric) care: 0.24/1000
  • For births that took place in primary care: 0.91/1000
  • For births that took place in secondary care: 0.45/1000
  • For births that were referred from primary care to secondary care in labour: 1.09/1000
  • Babies of women who were referred from a midwife to an obstetrician during labour had a 3.66 times higher risk of delivery-related perinatal death than did infants of women who started labour supervised by an obstetrician.

    The study concludes that:

    The obstetric care system in the Netherlands may contribute to the high perinatal mortality

    and:

    the Dutch system of risk selection in relation to perinatal death at term is not as effective as was once thought.

    I suggest that there is another major issue involved that has been ignored in the above suggestion. In the Netherlands, midwives book 105 women per year. You read that correctly. While in Australia, midwives care for around 20-40 women per year, in the Netherlands it’s a huge caseload of 105 women per year. Therefore it is impossible for the midwife to personally attend every labour for the duration. Instead, there is a system in place where the women are cared for by a Kraamverzorgenden who stays with the woman during labour and for the first week after the baby is born. This person does not perform any midwifery care but provides support to the woman. The midwife pops in and out every two or four hours to examine the woman and perhaps listen to the baby’s heart beat – I say “perhaps” because there is no official guideline in The Netherlands that this ought to be attended at any specified interval. Hence the midwives check the baby’s heart beat as and when they choose. Acknowledging that the midwife does not sit with each women in labour, it’s plausible that the baby’s heart beat would only be checked every two or four hours. The standard of care for the UK and Australia is that the baby’s heart beat should be checked every 15 minutes in labour and after every contraction in the second stage of labour when the baby is being born. This is identified in the article:

    Of major concern is the fact that the highest mortality was among the infants of women who were referred from primary care to secondary care during labour because of an apparent complication. Hypothetically, this high mortality could have several causes … diagnosis in primary care can be delayed because the midwife is not always present during the first stage of labour and fetal heart beats are often checked only every two to four hours.

    I am interested in why this fundamental issue has not been addressed; rather, a complete review of a system that is in place in other countries – successfully – has been called for?

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Undisturbed birth

    What is it?

    Most animals in labour will separate themselves from other animals and labour alone, often somewhere quiet and dark. Many animals will birth during the night. We often forget this, but human beings are animals too and we share similarities with other animals. It’s often found that women labour best when they are warm, in a darkened, quiet, peaceful and private setting. Like home.

    How does privacy and isolation contribute to easier and less complicated labour?

    We know from animal experiments that when mice are moved into an unfamiliar environment in labour, their labour is more difficult and longer. Observing the mice also made their labour longer and more difficult. What do we often do to women in labour in hospitals? We observe them in an unfamiliar environment … and wonder why their labour slows. The scenario is compounded when the woman is cared for by unfamiliar staff whom she has not met before, and whom care for multiple women at the same time.

    Anything that disturbs a birthing woman’s sense of safety and privacy has the potential to disrupt the birth process.

    This is because the hormones that are involved in birth are secreted by the brain, and these hormones need to flow unopposed by hormones that peak when we are fearful, tense and anxious. Anything that inhibits this flow of hormones such as bright lights, unfamiliar sounds, a cold room, beeping, unnecessary conversation, observation and expectations of behaviour – will very likely interrupt the natural birth process, making it longer and more painful.

    Ultimately, home is the best environment for promoting a safe, calm, relaxed, peaceful, warm and safe feeling. But not every woman wants a home birth, and not every woman is considered to birth at home (eg with twins, a breech aby, high blood pressure and so on). So the challenge is to recreate the optimal environment in the birth unit. It’s entirely possible! Soft music and lighting, bean bags, floor mats, baths, showers and continuity of midwifery care through pregnancy, labour and the postnatal period are a good place to start!

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Hospital Transfers

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    There have been some articles in the press in the past few days about women being transferred from one hospital – the one they were booked to give birth in – to a different hospital. See here and here.

    Of course the women and families concerned are, well … concerned. Any time a woman’s birth plans are disrupted without notice, the situation can be stressful.

    In one situation, a woman was transferred from Campbelltown Hospital in Sydney to John Hunter Hospital in Newcastle. She was in threatened premature labour with twins. The ambulance trip took three hours. This journey happened because there were no neonatal beds available in Sydney to care for these twins.

    On the surface, this seems appalling … a woman transferred by road, for three hours, carrying twins, with the possibility of delivering them in the ambulance! However, looking beneath the surface, the detail reveals that the care provided was appropriate. According to the media reports, the woman was only 26 weeks pregnant. This is called “extreme prematurity”. In cases of premature babies, we have a task of matching their care needs to the right hospitals. We have hospitals of different levels. Some are only equipped to care for term babies, being those born after 37 weeks, while others can care for babies born after 34 weeks. And very few – only 8 across NSW and ACT- can care for babies as young as these twins were.

    Caring for babies as young as these ones requires immense resources.

    Intensive care baby

    Intensive care baby

    A specialised neonatal cot, sophisticated monitoring equipment, syringe drivers, 24/7 access to pathology and radiology, a neonatologist (this is a paediatrician who specialises in the care of newborn babies) and dedicated NICU nurses. These are specialised nurses who have completed additional graduate certificates and have extensive clinical experience. In smaller hospitals, the requirement of having these skilled and competent practitioners – as well as the purchasing and maintenance of equipment that is seldom used – would represent a significant cost inefficiency. The vast majority of babies are born at term, with a mere 0.7% babies born at – or prior to – 26 weeks.

    The Health Minister, Jillian Skinner, advised that there were more than enough beds to cater for the State – and this is true. On average. Averages work well most of the time, but sometimes we need more beds than we have available, and this is when babies are transferred to another hospital. Sometimes this is as simple as transferring from say Canterbury Hospital to the near-by Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. Other times, rarely, babies are transferred further away, and even interstate. And other times – though this never reaches the news – there are very few babies in our neonatal intensive care units …. and the full complement of staff has very few babies to care for. Neonatal beds lie idle. This is never newsworthy but according to the law of averages, it happens as often as babies are transferred to another hospital.

    Some have argued that the woman should have been able to birth her babies at Campbelltown and then move the mother and babies to another hospital. This situation is what we call an ex-utero transfer, where babies are transferred after they have been born. unfortunately this is always worse for the babies for a couple of reasons: first, the birthing hospital may not have the facilities, staff, equipment and expertise to care for the babies, and second, when the specialised team arrives to transfer the babies, this complex transfer takes hours just to set-up in the hospital because the babies need to be switched over to the helicopter equipment and stabilised before they can be moved. Having been involved in these situations, I know it can take hours and this is all time that the fragile and delicate babies are being disturbed. So for many reasons (more than I have listed here), it is far better to do an in-utero transfer – that is, transferring babies while they are still inside their mothers.

    In this woman’s case, her babies remained safe inside and were not born.

    In another case, a woman was transferred in labour from a low-risk birth unit to a unit that handled higher-risk births when it became apparent that she had risk factors associated with her labour. This was a good call. A risk was anticipated that could not be dealt with at the local hospital, and the woman was safely moved to a unit that had the resources to provide safe care to her. This is no different to a woman moving from the birth centre to the delivery suite, or from a planned homebirth to hospital at any stage of the pregnancy or birth.

    What’s important is that the care that is provided is safe, and part of providing safe care is recognising the limitations of a service and having a good back-up plan or transfer plan. NSW has a specialised network that communicates well to advise all hospitals of which ones have available NICU beds. In this way, a midwife or doctor can quickly arrange a transfer. Likewise, a smaller hospital will be buddied with a nearby larger hospital with formal transfer plans and agreed indications for transfer, so that if a woman presents with something that is higher risk than what the smaller hospital can safely care for, the smaller hospital will have a plan in place to communicate with the larger hospital and to arrange a safe transfer.

    Melissa Maimann & Andrew Pesce: Collaborating for success

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    ALTHOUGH only a handful of collaborative arrangements have been signed between obstetricians and midwives since national maternity reforms were introduced in November, calls for a policy rethink are premature and counterproductive.

    In fact, the reforms provide an exciting opportunity for collaborative maternity care that is safe, locally responsive and woman-centred.

    A variety of private maternity care models are possible and we are confident these will build on Australia’s strong record of safety and quality in maternity care. They will also meet the needs of women who want the familiarity and the comfort of knowing the obstetrician and midwife who will be with them through their pregnancy, birth and new parenting experience …

    Obstetricians may be concerned that the new arrangements mean they will not be directly involved in patient care until something goes wrong, while some midwives fear that the arrangements will be used to control midwifery practice, adversely impact on childbirth choices and promote anticompetitive restriction of trade.

    We believe we are the first private obstetrician-midwife team in Australia to have successfully negotiated a formal collaborative arrangement and we are very happy with how it has progressed since our first discussions.

    The first woman under our joint care gave birth in March this year and we have several others booked through to January 2012.

    We share a similar philosophical approach to maternity care and have agreed practice guidelines that we believe to be safe, evidence-based and woman-centred …

    … Women appreciate the continuity of care, and the assurance that an obstetrician they have met will be involved if medical assistance is required. Feedback from women so far has been outstanding. The main criticism has been that this model of care is not available in other hospitals.

    One of the reasons why there are currently so few collaborative arrangements has been the time taken by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency to endorse eligible midwives and by public maternity units to credential midwives in private practice.

    … Our agreed guidelines are explained to patients before they engage our services and childbirth choices are not restricted. In fact, choices are enhanced as the midwife is able to attend births in the full capacity of a midwife in hospital.

    Importantly, our model of care does not dictate “transfer” of care, merely a shift in the balance of obstetric and midwifery care because we recognise that every pregnant woman needs her own obstetrician and midwife. We support midwife care during waterbirth, vaginal birth after caesarean section, physiological birth positioning and physiological third stage.

    Change is often difficult as we all tend to be creatures of habit. This change brings with it many opportunities for obstetricians and midwives in private practice to work together in ways that are beneficial to both and, importantly, to the women in their care.

    … The maternity reforms will succeed if we remember that midwives and obstetricians are in it for the same reason — to provide safe care that meets the needs of our patients, within a respectful, professional environment.

    Dr Andrew Pesce is an obstetrician practising in Sydney and immediate past president of the AMA. Ms Melissa Maimann is a midwife in private practice based in Sydney.

    Rules on patient safety hit midwives

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Homebirth supporters claim bureaucrats are restricting women’s choice by stopping some midwives from managing higher-risk homebirths, particularly women who have had a caesarean delivery.

    Homebirth Australia said it was aware of more than 20 recent cases … where midwives had been deregistered or had conditions imposed on their registration because of claims they were working outside safe guidelines.

    … The Weekend West is aware of a WA midwife who was ordered last week to stop providing care for planned homebirths in women at higher risk, including those who had a caesarean and wanted to have a normal birth in the next pregnancy.

    The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency wrote to the midwife, saying the condition was imposed by the WA Nursing and Midwifery Board because the midwife had not proved he or she could provide a safe homebirth environment for a planned vaginal birth after a caesarean.

    “The board formed the reasonable belief that because of your alleged conduct issues, you pose a serious risk to persons, and it is necessary to take immediate action to impose conditions on your registration to protect public health or safety,” the letter said.

    … the move could force women to have unattended homebirths, putting them and their babies at risk. “We can’t by stealth deregister or pose conditions on midwives which rob women of access to a registered health professional,” she said.

    Australian Medical Association WA president Dave Mountain … questioned whether the health system should allow higher-risk women to exercise the choice of homebirth when there were clear risks for them and their babies.

    What a huge ethical debate – largely unresolved. All women have the right to autonomy – the right to make choices, have control over what happens to their body, to accept or reject advice and interventions, to decide when, where and by whom they will be cared for, to access care – or not. It is a fundamental human right that is enshrined in law.

    On the other side – the health practitioner has a duty of care to the woman and her unborn baby and is obliged to provide safe care at all times. Safety is defined in terms of what the average midwife would do, or by accepted professional standards, or by laws relating to practice. A health practitioner cannot be incited to practice unsafely: they must make a judgment and adhere to professional standards.

    So where does this leave us all when the two positions collide? Although we have guidelines on what we ought to do in those situations, as we can see from the above article, they do not hold water. The consequence for now is an increase in the number of women opting to freebirth – that is an unassisted homebirth (no midwife present). I am hopeful that in time, the regulatory authorities will support midwives to support all women.

    Maternity Reforms: Good news for expanded birthing options

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Maternity reforms came into effect in November 2010 which gave women access to Medicare benefits for private midwifery care for the very first time. In addition, eligible midwives were to be able to order relevant tests and ultrasounds through Medicare. Medicare benefits are available to clients of eligible midwives for pregnancy and postnatal care, however there is no benefit for birth care at home.

    So, 6-odd months on, how are things looking for maternity care and what possibilities await us?

    Well, for a start, we had around 200 private midwives in Australia. 6-odd months into the reforms and we have at least 30-40 eligible midwives. Some of those 200 midwives have ceased private practice, leaving about 100 in private practice. So 30-40 eligible midwives represents a 30%-40% update of the maternity reforms by the current private practice workforce in just 6 months. That is phenomenal. As well as this, private practice has become a more attractive option to employed midwives now that private practice is medicare-funded and indemnified. So in months and years to come, we will have more midwives in private practice, and less in the hospital employed system. This is not a concern as the hospitals would not need their own staff: women will bring their midwife with them to the hospital when they come in to birth their babies. From the hospitals’ perspective, this is excellent news: they may benefit from significant cost savings in terms of recruitment, retention, staff education, pay-roll, rostering, management and so on.

    What about for women? Well, it is well-known that women benefit from exclusive one-to-one midwifery care through pregnancy, labour, birth and the postnatal period. When women are cared for exclusively by one midwife, we know that they experience lower rates of interventions without compromising safety, and they experience higher rates of satisfaction with their birth and new parenting experience. When women choose a Eligible midwife, they can access significant medicare benefits that do reduce the cost by quite a lot. Depending on the number of pregnancy and postnatal consultations a woman has, the benefits range from say $1,000 – $2,500.

    However, in order for eligible midwives to provide medicare-rebatable services, midwifery care needs to be delivered within a collaborative arrangement. And this does open the possibility for private midwives and private obstetricians to work together in collaborative practice. The huge benefit to the woman is that she has midwifery care right the way through, from early pregnancy to 6 weeks after her baby arrives, with the reassurance of having a known obstetrician who is available is needed. Women meet the obstetrician twice in pregnancy, and the obstetrician is available for labour and birth if his care is needed, and in this way, women can benefit from the ultimate in continuity of carer. This model of care is now available for the very first time in Australia history, and we are very pleased to be able to offer it to women. So far it is a very popular option! More to come.

    Is ‘tribal’ obstetric culture endangering mothers and babies?

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    How we are born, who supports mothers and the quality of the care provided during birth are vital to good public health and personal well being. But all is not well in modern birthing in spite of the advances of modern medicine.

    In the United Kingdom, health policies aim to keep childbirth normal or natural and dynamic …

    In Australia, a national Review of Maternity Services (MSR) in 2009-10 generated heated public debate. It spawned critiques of the medical control of birth and the self-interest of privately practising obstetricians.

    Its outcomes remain hotly contested, particularly over women’s access midwives and home birthing.

    Much health policy now promotes strategies to improve quality and safety as being critical to good patient-centred care.

    But the Maternity Services Review overlooked some problems in the culture of obstetrics.

    … It is their philosophy and practices that have shaped the system of modern hospitalized childbirth care.

    The obstetric profession … is accountable for making sure neither practitioners nor the systems of care cause harm to women and their babies.

    … several public inquiries … showed that harm was not just being caused but was covered up.

    … painful details of serious harm done by doctors to women in maternity units, including unnecessary hysterectomies, assault, and even genital mutilation.

    … Most worrying were the common patterns of denial: stories of damage to women were mostly not reported by colleagues out of professional or “tribal” loyalty.

    Until the cases became public, they were seen just as “mistakes” or medical “misdemeanours”, or as caused by individual “bad apples” in the profession.

    Even many anaesthetists, pathologists and midwives colluded in keeping silent about women’s tragedies.

    … Individual, institutional and systemic problems are interwoven. Viewing childbirth care as a field full of power though allows us also to see how it can be reformed.

    Encouragingly, the public inquiries point to changing times: women as health care consumers used the press to agitate for these inquiries and have lobbied for wider reform.

    Midwives have also been speaking up about problems in the system.

    Some obstetricians, too, are committed to the reform of professional practice …

    But we need to go even further.

    Obstetric undergraduate and postgraduate education also needs reform. More critical reflection on the profession’s gendered and racialized power is necessary, and greater awareness of public health and social issues.

    Professional bodies … should also be expected … to develop mechanisms for critical self-examination of attitudes toward women.

    Similarly, doctors need to engage seriously with midwives’ concerns about policies pushing “inter-professional collaboration”.

    Too often, these seem to be on medical terms and experienced as continued domination rather than an equal, respectful relationship.

    High quality obstetric care remains essential for women with complex medical problems … It should be effectively supported by public funds but obstetricians are accountable for how they use them.

    … “Birth is not an illness”. Quality and safety in maternity care should not be equated with providing obstetric care.

    Women deserve real choice and autonomy in childbirth. Improving care requires more than good hospital incident-reporting systems and support for staff to report medical errors. These are valuable but not enough.

    Cultural change in maternity care institutions and health professions, and in the broader society’s views of childbirth care, is essential if we are to keep mothers and babies safe from harm.

    Doctors admit C-section error in tragic baby’s botched birth

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    TWO consultants have admitted to the parents of a baby deprived of oxygen at birth they should have performed a caesarean section earlier.

    Baby Senan Michael Christopher Dodd was born at Mount Carmel Hospital, Dublin, on March 28, 2008.

    There was a delay in performing the emergency birth procedure and the baby boy suffered severe brain damage due to oxygen deprivation …

    He died … on March 30, 2008.

    Two consultants obstetricians … acknowledged … the caesarean section should have been performed earlier.

    Dr Rafferty said he contributed to the delay in delivering the baby and expressed his “profound apologies” to the baby’s parents …

    [The] Midwife … told the court she called Dr Rafferty to review Roberta … due to lack of progress of labour, following an hour of active pushing.

    The doctor said he gave the parents the option of a caesarean section or of an epidural with syntocinon …

    Syntocinon and an epidural were administered.

    But the doctor failed to look back at the trace of the foetal heartbeat, which indicated a slow heart rate at 2.45pm and another slow rate after pushing began.

    … He told the inquest he should have, “been more direct and said a C-section was the way to go”.

    He agreed with counsel for the family, Bruce Antoniotti, that he did not tell the Dodds there was foetal distress because he failed to perceive it, as he failed to look back far enough on the trace.

    The baby’s heart rate was monitored intermittently …

    This is the standard of care for women in normal labour with a healthy pregnancy and baby.

    Dr Valerie Donnelly, who took over from Dr Rafferty, reviewed Mrs Dodd around 6.20pm after a prolonged period of slow foetal heart rate.

    Dr Donnelly proceeded as planned and recommenced the syntocinon although it had been turned off by the midwife, who was preparing for a C-section.

    “I regret I did not deliver the baby by C-section at that point. I believe my delay in making the decision to deliver him by caesarean section has contributed to his death,” …

    Special delivery brings relief

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    PRUE Corlette travelled up to five hours a day to Liverpool Hospital from Rose Bay.

    … The twins were born nine weeks premature at Liverpool Hospital … not at The Royal Hospital for Women as she intended.

    When Ms Corlette went into early labour, there was no room in the Randwick hospital where her midwife and obstetrician were.

    Their 15 high-care cots in the neonatal intensive care unit were all occupied but there were ones available at Liverpool, Canberra and Newcastle hospitals — the closest one Liverpool, 45 kilometres away.

    “My midwife and obstetrician (from the Royal Hospital for Women) couldn’t come with me,” …

    … “I had built up a good rapport with my obstetrician … We had similar philosophies of birth.

    “When I got to Liverpool, the birth philosophy was quite different. They wouldn’t even give me a hot water bottle.”

    Theodore arrived first, then Hugo was born through an emergency caesarean section.

    “I had a succession of different doctors see me,” …

    “To be going into premature labour and to not have a consultant is terrible.

    “My second baby got into some kind of distress. I heard people screaming ‘code red’ but no one explained to me what was happening.”

    Ms Corlette was discharged after three days but the twins remained at Liverpool Hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit for another 10 days.

    Having undergone a caesarean she was not allowed to drive so she had to make the long trip from her home on public transport.

    “The staff in the neonatal unit were very helpful but the maternity ward not so good. It was very busy and overcrowded,” …

    The babies were transferred to the Royal Hospital for Women when cots became available.

    … “Liverpool Hospital has a well-staffed and resourced 12-bed Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), which is one of a number of NICUs in NSW that provide specialised care for premature and very sick babies from across the state,” …

    … neonatal intensive care beds are networked to ensure that whenever an expectant mother gives birth, she and her baby have access to the specialist care required. “This may result in the transfer from one hospital to another due to the level of care required or bed availability.”

    If I were Prue, I’d be thankful that care was available for my babies, that I did not have to be flown to Canberra (or further – say to Perth), and that we live in a country that provides such a high standard of care to mothers and babies. She did not get the care she had planned from the midwife and obstetrician that she had chosen and this was not expected, but thankfully a transfer was possible to a hospital that could provide the necessary care. Had her babies been born at RHW, they could not have received the care they needed as there were no cots available in the NICU, and presumably no staff available to care for the babies.

    For some women, a transfer will be needed. This could be because the hospital doesn’t have the facilities to care for the baby – such as a private hospital or a small public hospital – or because the larger public hospital’s NICU is full. It’s not possible to staff every unit with NICU-qualified staff 24/7 and obtain and maintain the very specialised equipment that is needed so seldom. Hence, these specialised services are provided in a few centres. In Sydney, we are proud to have 6 hospitals with NICU facilities. These hospitals provide a high standard of care to preterm babies, as measured by international standards. We are lucky to live in a country where our babies can be cared for so well.

    Amazing websites and great info

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    I’d like to share some amazing websites and links:

    http://birthrites.org/ Birthrites have a new website. Birthrites is an Australian website dedicated to VBAC.

    http://www.vimeo.com/22765005 A lovely recording of a home birth. Just beautiful. Be sure to watch it to the end. Tissues might be needed!

    http://painfreelabour.blogspot.com/ I love the premise: Pain free labour is an achievable goal for the majority of women with a normal first stage of labour. Women are taught from an early age to fear going into labour. When they do they start secreting adrenalin, this causes changes in the body which cause labour contractions to feel painful. You can reduce adrenalin output by using relaxation techniques in pregnancy and labour. Once you know the truth, you have a chance to choose.

    http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/themes/birthanddeath/childbirth.aspx This looks at (Royal) childbirth from 1533 onwards. Fascinating!

    Obesity in pregnancy hinders women’s ability to fight infection

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Pregnant women who are obese are less able to fight infections than lean women, which could affect their baby’s health after birth and later in life …

    … Obesity in pregnancy has been associated with an increase in infections such as chorioamnionitis …

    … obese women had fewer CD8+ (cytotoxic T) cells and natural killer cells, which help fight infection, compared to lean women. In addition, obese pregnant women’s ability to produce cells to fight infection was impaired. …

    Another reason why it is really valuable to book a preconception appointment with an obstetrician or midwife so ensure that you can be in the healthiest state possible before becoming pregnant.

    Chimpanzee birth similar to humans: study

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Hirata and his team had essentially been living with these chimpanzees, even sleeping in the chimpanzee’s enclosures at night in order to be able to witness and capture the births on video. Before this research, no one had witnessed a live chimpanzee birth, as by nature chimpanzees get nervous at birth and seek isolation. During the births, they observed that, like humans, the babies are born facing away from the mother …

    While they were witnessing the births, the researchers did not realize what they were about to discover would be something contributing to evolutionary theory. It was not until they had a discussion with a researcher in human childbirth that they discovered what their findings meant.

    Back in the 1980s, researchers suggested that a change in birthing position through human revolution was what led to the use of assistance with birth and midwifery. The idea behind this was that because the babies were born backwards, it made it difficult for a mother to pick up and nurture the baby as birth completed.

    Witnessing these chimpanzee births, and that fact that they are positioned the same as humans, show that this theory is not the case. Chimpanzees do not require another chimpanzee to assist with the birth, and as observed, they are more comfortable isolating themselves for birth.

    … Researchers have argued that the process of human birth is unique among primates and mammals in that the infant emerges with its face oriented in the opposite direction from its mother … However, this notion of human uniqueness has not been substantiated, because there are few comparative studies of birth in non-human primates … the chimpanzee newborns landed on the ground without being guided from the birth canal by the mother. The fact that the human newborn emerges with an occiput anterior orientation has thus far been taken as evidence for the necessity of midwifery in modern humans, but this view also needs revision …

    Pioneering Collaborative Private Maternity Care: Continuity, woman-centered, personalised, safe.

    Our brand new model of care – launched for the first time in Australia – has recently welcomed its third baby. So far, three families have benefited from a collaborative model of private maternity care that enables women to have care with a private midwife (with Medicare funding) and also develop a trusting and nurturing relationship with a Specialist Obstetrician who is available for the pregnancy, labour and birth. Our service has so far supported an empowered birth after caesarean, a waterbirth and a natural birth. All within a hospital setting, with all the support available that is occasionally needed.

    We’ve received some really positive feedback:

    “The collaborative model seemed unique to me. To have a private midwife and our own birth experience but in a hospital with an obstetrician who was known to us as back-up in case of unexpected complications, allowed us to feel totally comfortable and confident for our first baby.”
    “I felt entirely supported and encouraged.”
    “A highly personalised level of care was offered which makes you feel listened to and allows time for lots of questions.”
    “I liked the fact that we got time to develop a relationship and feel comfortable together, allowing us a better birth experience. Postnatally, it was nice to have the same person continuing my care. It was highly personalised.”

    Our model sees women booking with me for their care. Women who are interested in having collaborative maternity care meet with the obstetrician early in their pregnancy and again between 32 and 36 weeks. Women see the obstetrician more often if additional visits with him are needed. Otherwise, I am in frequent communication with him and we work together to provide safe, evidence-based, woman-centered care to our pregnant women. This allows women to build a sense of connection, trust and continuity.

    We support natural birth, active birth, physiological birth positions, physiological third stage, water birth, VBAC, twin births, breech births … and so on. Women are really well prepared for natural birth with an emphasis on informed decision making and woman-centered care. Childbirth education is included, as well as access to a lending library of books and DVDs.

    Birth care is provided initially at home and then we move to hospital where I provide full midwifery care. The birth is attended by myself and the Obstetrician if needed / desired. It’s an intimate, calm, peaceful experience and facilitates a gentle and safe birth.

    After we have welcomed the baby and birthed the placenta, women generally stay in hospital for 4 – 24 hours before returning home. Of course, if there are any issues women are welcome to stay longer, but generally I find that women feel more comfortable in their own homes, in their own beds. I visit at home every day for a week and continue care for 6 weeks. Since women book into hospital as a private patient, they are almost assured a private room with an en-suite.

    I’m really excited about this model of care because it meets the needs of women so perfectly:

  • Women having their first babies, maybe feeling unsure of what to expect
  • Women who previously experienced dis-continuous care from care providers who were unknown to them
  • Women who are planning a natural birth but perhaps with a more challenging pregnancy
  • Women who want a home birth / birth centre birth but with a known obstetrician available if needed
  • Women who really desire a sense of control over their birthing experience
  • This is a new way of working for both midwives and obstetricians and is a really supportive and nurturing way to practice. There is a huge potential for professional growth and learning. The most positive element, however, is the radiant smiles on the faces of the women who have birthed with us and the babies who have received a safe and gentle start to life.

    Half of world’s stillbirths ‘preventable’

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    More than two million babies are stillborn each year worldwide and about half could be saved if their mothers had better medical care …

    While the vast majority of stillbirths happen in the developing world, the rates in countries including Britain, France and the US have not dropped … as rising obesity levels among pregnant women increase the risk.

    Experts say providing better obstetric care, treating conditions like syphilis, high blood pressure and diabetes in mothers, among other strategies, could save more than one million infants every year.

    … In developing countries, most stillbirths are caused by delivery complications, maternal infections in pregnancy, foetal growth problems and congenital abnormalities.

    In developed countries, the reasons are often unclear why stillbirths occur, and surveillance and autopsy data are patchy.

    Risk factors for women include being over 35 years of age, carrying excess weight, smoking, alcohol or drug abuse, teenage pregnancy and multiple pregnancies, belonging to an ethnic minority group and social deprivation …

    Obese women warned of poor infant health

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Women with weight problems, particularly those dealing with obesity, are warned of the possible pregnancy risk and health concerns for their future babies.

    Babies born to mothers who were obese in early pregnancy have a much greater risk of dying before, during, or up to one year after birth …

    The risk of a baby dying in the womb (fetal death) or up to one year after birth (infant death) was twice as high among women who were obese (BMI of 30 or more) in early pregnancy than among those with normal weight (BMI of 18.5 to 24.5).

    There were nearly eight more fetal and infant deaths per 1,000 births among obese women than among women with normal weight. The total (absolute) risk of fetal or infant death was 16 in every 1,000 births (1.6 percent) among obese women and nearly 9 per 1,000 births (0.9 percent) among normal weight women.

    The lowest risk was among women with a BMI of 23 …

    … “What’s key is that women should be helped to achieve a healthy weight before they become pregnant or after the baby is born …

    Baby death shows need for collaborative care

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    The death of a baby during delivery demonstrates the need for collaborative arrangements between doctors and midwives …

    A coronor ruled this week that a baby girl who died of asphyxia … had not been “adequately monitored” during labour and could have potentially been saved if the midwife had referred the case to an obstetrician earlier on.

    … coroner John Hutton, made 21 recommendations, many of which involved models of collaborative care to ensure women and their babies are better protected from inadequate care.

    President of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), Dr Rupert Sherwood said the inquest highlighted why the college has always insisted on collaborative arrangements between doctors and midwives.

    … “This highlights two critical aspects of good collaborative care between midwives and doctors.

    “Namely the importance of following established protocols such as fetal heart monitoring when indicated, and timely referral to another member of the team with training and expertise to intervene in a safe and timely manner’ …

    New limits for older mothers

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    DOCTORS should induce older mums by 40 weeks or risk stillbirths, findings from the country’s biggest study into perinatal deaths has revealed.

    … the current policy of inducing labour at 41 weeks for all pregnant women needs to be reviewed for mothers aged 40 or older.

    … pregnant women aged 40 or older faced much higher risk of stillbirths once they reached their due date compared to younger mothers.

    … the general policy in hospitals was to induce birth at 41 weeks, with the risk of stillbirth 2.2 times higher for all mothers past their due dates. But the prognosis was more dire for older mothers, with the risk sharply rising from 38 weeks.

    … One of the key findings was that babies who died in stillbirth tended to move less in the final trimester, despite the widely held belief that babies slowed their movements towards the end of pregnancy.

    “People often get told that the baby slows down,” … “We found that … for people who have a healthy pregnancy outcome – it seems to be much more common that for the last few weeks prior to the interview, the baby movements become stronger.”

    … viral infections were not as significant as previously thought because they appeared to be just as common in healthy births.

    Urinary tract infections were more common in the mothers who lost a baby …

    “Do it yourself” births prompt alarm

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    A growing number of women are choosing to give birth without the assistance of doctors or midwives, provoked by dissatisfaction with modern obstetric care, fear of unnecessary medical intervention and a desire to reclaim birth as a private, natural act.

    It’s a choice the professionals say is fraught with peril. They fear the fledgling “freebirth” movement may undo gains in mother-infant mortality. The women, however, believe unassisted childbirth is emotionally and physically the safest option for themselves and their babies.

    Some 33%, or 8708 out of 26 667 homebirths in the United States in 2007 were not attended by a physician or midwife … Two-thirds of those deliveries attended by someone other than a physician or midwife … were reported as “planned” …

    Canada lacks similar statistics, but a cursory search online turns up a surfeit of websites, forums … dedicated to freebirth …

    It’s a difficult trend to track with any certainty … because advocates of unassisted childbirth aim to avoid interaction with the medical system wherever possible.

    While some women forgo prenatal care entirely, others orchestrate a “planned oops” or “accidental” unassisted birth to avoid confrontation with health care providers and the law.

    Many are already mothers, wary after a bad experience with a doctor or midwife.

    “My first son’s hospital birth left something to be desired … the doctor I had was terrible. When I became pregnant a second time, I sought out a midwife and while one of the women in the practice was great, the other really talked down to my husband and I … ” … “I was probably seven months pregnant when I decided I didn’t want [that midwife] at my birth. I didn’t want it to be a guessing game.”

    Others fear being coerced into medical procedures they’re not comfortable with.

    “There are some people who can go into the birthing room and put their foot down, but I know when I go into a doctor’s office for an appointment, I get overwhelmed, let alone in a case where they’re saying your baby might die,” … “I think it’s easier to trust yourself if there’s not another voice there. Having that other set of interests involved makes me uncomfortable.”

    Doctors and midwives bring their own timelines and expectations about how a delivery should proceed, and will err on the side of intervening in birth to protect themselves against litigation … “I can see the position they’re in, because if you don’t deliver a perfect baby there’s a chance you’ll get sued, and there’s this idea that if you’ve transferred someone to the hospital or done a C-section then you’ve done everything you could.”

    … primary C-section rates ranged from a high of 23% of deliveries in Newfoundland and Labrador to a low of 14% in Manitoba.

    With up to 15% of all births involving potentially fatal complications, however, “the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of giving birth with a skilled attendant present,” …

    Proponents of unassisted childbirth say it’s all a matter of perspective. They prefer to view birth as a “spiritual, sexual experience, not an inherently dangerous medical event,” says Shanley. “I trust the same intelligence that knows how to grow the baby from an egg and a sperm into a human being also knows how to complete the process.”

    Unnecessary intervention in birth is more often the cause of complications than a remedy, she adds. “People counting, measuring and managing birth into this controlled, manipulated act, it’s no wonder women’s bodies shutdown — the way anybody’s would if someone kept interrupting them while they were trying to have sex, go to the bathroom or go to sleep.”

    Intervention should be the last resort, not a given … ” … one of the nurses asked why we didn’t go to the hospital and my husband looked her in the eye and said: ‘Because it wasn’t an emergency.’”

    The couple prepared for complications by reading books for first responders on how to deliver babies in emergency situations.

    Others look for such information online.

    “I had to assess what my personal risks were,” says Rundle. “I’m a healthy young woman, so when people say that 15% of the time there’s a complication, are they talking about women who have different medical histories than I have?”

    Some women, like Shanley, prefer to put complete faith in their bodies and refer to complications as “variations of normal.”

    “There are going to be babies who die during an unassisted birth who may not have if there had been intervention, but there are also going to be babies who die because of interventions,” she explains. “There’s no way to ensure a successful birth every time. Sometimes a baby dies and that’s just the way it is.”

    It’s not a stance Shanley takes lightly, having lost a child to a congenital heart defect following an unassisted delivery, and been told by a coroner that the baby would have died even if she had gone to the hospital.

    It’s a difficult stance to counter, says Canadian Association of Midwives president Anne Wilson. “You can’t say to a mum that 60% of all unassisted births result in complications where the baby dies because that kind of statistic doesn’t exist. A lot of complications in childbirth are predictable and occur over time, but a few happen without warning, such as severe hemorrhage. And if a woman doesn’t have prenatal care, doesn’t report the birth to the hospital, there’s no way to know.”

    … “Unassisted childbirth is unsafe — period,” … “The people advocating this as a mainstream option for women are tragically uninformed.”

    Midwives, however, are more “fuzzy” on the issue, says Wilson. The association has yet to take an official stance for fear of alienating women wary of intervention. “If someone came to us who was considering an unassisted birth we would want to keep that person engaged, build a relationship of trust and if they ended up going ahead with it, at least you’re someone they can call if they get half way through a delivery and change their mind.”

    Failing that, “some prenatal care is better than none,” she adds.

    The debate raises ethical questions of “autonomy versus beneficence” for midwives, Wilson says. “By the nature of what we do, we tend to look after people who don’t want interventions. It would come down to individual choice in terms of how comfortable you are as a practitioner taking that person into your care.”

    For Shanley, however, unassisted childbirth is more a question of reproductive rights. “It’s your body, your birth and your baby, so you should have the right to give birth however you want.”

    ‘Kangaroo care’ enhances mother-baby bond

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Visit my website.

    Link

    … “kangaroo mother care” … The idea was that a mother’s body temperature could take the place of the incubator – just like a mother kangaroo nurtures her baby in her pouch – while enhancing mother-to-baby bonding.

    Holding the baby skin to skin in an upright or near-upright position around the clock also would encourage successful breast-feeding and allow early discharge of stable babies regardless of weight or gestational age.

    Magee began promoting the practise in 1997 in the neonatal intensive care unit. It expanded in the last few years … Dads can do kangaroo care, too.

    … kangaroo care of low-birthweight infants reduced severe illness, infection and breast-feeding problems; improved mother-baby bonding and perhaps even saved lives …

    … “The surprising benefits of kangaroo care for the infant include warmth, stability of heartbeat and breathing, increased time spent in the deep-sleep and quiet-alert states, decreased crying, increased weight gain, and increased breast-feeding. These benefits are apparent even when kangaroo care occurs for only a few minutes each day,” the academy says on its website.

    … Casper credited kangaroo care with a baby’s “better weight gain; better sleep time – sleep helps brain development; they grow better; it helps with mother’s anxiety and postpartum depression”, she said, adding: “It evens out their breathing, (helps) skin maturation; and declining rates of infection.”

    She said studies have shown kangaroo care will decrease the length of their hospital stay, so it’s a potential cost-saving measure.

    … breast-feeding is more likely to be exclusive and of longer duration; even bottle-fed babies stabilise more quickly in terms of body temperature, heart rate and breathing.

    … “It can be used months later and have an impact on mother, baby, dad,” she said. “Continuing skin to skin through the first year there is a benefit: babies have better self-esteem, a sense of trust.”

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website.