Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

Complicated pregnancy or birth

“I’ve been told my baby is big”

and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Natural Twin Birth

I had a difficult delivery with my first baby, including posterior presentation, premature rupture of membranes, meconium staining, stalled labour, 18 hours of Syntocinon, a largely ineffectual epidural, a 4 hour second stage, and forceps delivery. My daughter had severe respiratory distress and was in the NICU for several days. It was a very tough introduction to parenthood and left me quite traumatised, especially the separation from my daughter. My husband and I decided that we would try for a homebirth if we had another baby, in the hope that a calmer environment would assist the birth process. When I fell pregnant again, we found a lovely homebirth midwife.

I started to show really early. At 8 weeks I was in maternity wear. I thought it was just because it was a second pregnancy, but a 9 week ultrasound showed TWO BABIES. We were completely shocked as there are no twins in my family. Twins of course meant that a homebirth was out of the question.

There followed many long months of argument with various obstetricians about our birth choices. We wanted as little intervention as possible. A standard twin delivery involves syntocinon (which I was very afraid of, after the previous experience), continuous monitoring (which I had hated with my first birth, as I felt chained to the bed) and an epidural prior to the second stage, in case positioning/version or a c-section is necessary to deliver the second twin. In my first birth, the epidural meant I had no pushing urge and seriously compromised my ability to deliver my daughter, hence the very prolonged second stage, so I did not want an epidural this time around, although I was prepared for Synto to be administered between the twins if labour did not re-establish. The hospital also wanted both twins delivered on the bed, which I did not agree with as I had found pushing in that position impossible the first time around. Our views were very challenging to the obstetricians and some were quite aggressive about it, although I must say the head OB was more reasonable and was prepared to admit that my refusal to consent to an epidural would be a “complete contraindication” to giving me one! Throughout this stage our midwife was a pillar of strength and information. She gave us the courage of our convictions and more than once came to the hospital to talk with the obstetricians on our behalf. Even so, the hospital was very unhappy with our birth preferences. It was a stressful time, helped somewhat by a Calmbirth ® course.

In the end all our arguments ended up being moot. At 33 weeks, I started to feel an ominous itching all over. Tests showed elevated bile salts and poor liver function results. I had obstetric cholestasis. Our midwife and the hospital agreed: the babies would need to be delivered by 37 weeks. And I knew that that early, an induction would almost certainly involve Syntocinon.

This was really difficult for me to accept. I was terribly afraid of the drug, and knew that Synto would mean continuous monitoring and therefore limit my movement, which I also feared. However, I knew that my fear would make the delivery more difficult and the pain worse. At this point the hospital dropped the bombshell that despite all their delivery rooms having deep birthing baths, I would not be allowed to use those or the shower if I had to have Synto, as they believe this risks pump damage to the Synto pump. Essentially this meant I was walking into a labour that was likely to be more painful, with less pain relief options. It was going to be down to Calmbirth ® alone, if I wanted to avoid drugs (and I did!).

I did a lot of Calmbirth ® practice from then on. But the Calmbirth ® visualisation exercises presupposed a normal delivery without intervention, and I found it very upsetting to listen to them. I hit on the idea of doing my own visualisations, of a medicalised induction process. After a few of these I was able to work through some of my fears.

On the day of the induction, we kissed our daughter goodbye at 5am and met our midwife at the hospital. Preliminary checks showed a Bishop score of 5, very promising for 36 weeks. The hospital midwife applied prostaglandin gel and sent us out to freedom. We had a lovely breakfast. I started to have sporadic contractions but nothing serious. We returned to the hospital 6 hours later. My cervix had ripened to 2cm, and the very cheerful OB was able to break the waters for twin 1 (our second daughter) at 3.45pm. No meconium staining! I dared to ask the OB how she was presenting. ANTERIOR, WOOHOO! I was very pleased with that.

Contractions came rather more strongly after that point, but were still sporadic. The felt very “knifey”, and our midwife explained this was from the prostaglandin gel. We held off on the Synto as long as possible, but at 6.25pm the drip was put up and contractions started in earnest. Continuous monitoring was in place, but via telemetry so I could have moved. Ironically, though, I didn’t feel the need to. I went deep into calm breathing and spent most of the labour sitting beside the bed on a fit ball, sometimes circling my hips but more often just breathing to ride the contractions with my husband stroking my back. Unlike my first labour, I had no real idea of when the next contraction was coming, and ended up doing my calm breathing (in for 4, out for 6) solidly for hours. I wasn’t afraid of the contractions. I could really feel them doing their work, and little twin 1 moving firm and fast down. I was determined to “get out of the way” of labour and with each contraction focused on opening up and not clenching against the pain. Our midwife was convinced things were going quickly and asked us when we thought we would be having the babies. I told her anything before midnight was a sucker bet! She said 11pm.

At 8.30pm, about 2 hours after I started having regular contractions, the pain was starting to get BIG. The OB did a cervix check – I was 5cm. I was very disheartened by this, but our midwife told me that the first 5cm was the hardest, and the very encouraging OB tried to convince me that it wasn’t all about centimetres and that my cervix felt promisingly thin and stretchy. In hindsight, even in my first labour I dilated from 5 to 10cm in under an hour, so I should have known what was coming – but I didn’t!

Throughout this time I was not making any noise. The hospital’s midwife didn’t seem to think I was in established labour, and threatened to up the Synto dose to make the contractions “strong and regular”, even though they were already sufficient to dilate my cervix 3cm in under 2 hours. I managed to insist “no. more. Synto!” She reserved judgement, but it might have been the adrenaline kick I needed, as by 9.15pm I was having enormous contractions every 2-3 minutes. I could feel them as a giant swelling band of pain stretching around my whole belly and stretching lower. At this point I started vocalising “ah, ah, ah” throughout contractions, to help me ride the pain and stop me clenching down. I remember saying “if this isn’t transition, I’m in trouble!” I didn’t believe it could be transition, though – not so early, not when my first birth had taken almost 3 days. Our midwife said she thought we would have babies by 10pm, and I didn’t believe her.

I needed to get off the fit ball and change position, and asked if I could get on all fours, although the idea of moving seemed impossible to imagine. The hospital midwife set up a crash mat and a nice beanbag for me to lean on. I leaned forward and within one contraction of moving had started making some amazing noises. Unlike my “ah ah ahs” they were completely involuntary. And then I could feel twin 1 crowning. I did not believe it had happened so quickly, and cried out “what’s happening?” Everyone still makes fun of me for this. She was born in only a couple of pushes at 9.25pm, and our midwife had to tell the hospital midwife to put her gloves on to catch her. Our beautiful daughter, with a lovely round head, pink skin and a great big yell! There is a photo of me still on all fours, with a blissed-out grin. I could not believe how easy and quick it had been. I got to hold her straight away, but contractions started up again quite quickly, and she went to her daddy for some skin to skin time.

At this point the obstetricians arrived – a registrar and resident. I wanted to stay on the floor, but the registrar managed to persuade me up on the bed to check twin 2′s position, as we knew he was breech. Contractions started up again within minutes and were really agonising now, as I had lost my Calmbirth focus and as the position (twin 2′s spine to mine) had that sort of posterior feeling to it. But within seconds I was again feeling the inexorable urge to push. The OB flicked twin 2′s feet out as he was in a squatting position, the midwife and OB flexed twin 2′s head by pushing on my stomach and with a few mighty pushes he was out too, at 9.39pm. Our son! He was handed to me but unlike J, had a bit of trouble breathing, and spent some time in the special care nursery. He was back to us almost before we knew it. I must say he had a very breech-looking head, which looked like a mighty frown, but he’s ever so handsome and cheerful now.

J weighed in at 2.98kg (I was really ticked off she could not stretch to the extra 20gm), and P weighed 3.06kg, excellent weights for 36 weekers, let alone twins!

After twin 2 was out, I lost all patience for the pain – rather a pity as the Synto kept getting ramped up to deliver the placentas and then to deal with my uterus which did not want to shrink back down. I ended up with a Synto drip all night. I tell people this birth was meant to help me deal with my fear of Synto once and for all.

Both babies had beautiful breastfeeds within an hour or two of birth, which sadly was not an omen of things to come for twin 1, but it was lovely.


Anyway, that was our birth. Twins born without any pain relief (not even hot water) or really any intervention other than the induction drugs, with 4 hours of contractions total and only about 2 of those active labour. It wasn’t the birth I had wanted but it was a wonderful experience and very healing after my first daughter’s birth. I am so proud of myself, and look back on the birth with amazed gratitude all the time.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Labour induction methods compare favourably

Link

… a method of inducing labour that dates back to the 1930s “has been found to work as well as modern treatments but with fewer side effects”.

The news is based on a large Dutch trial that examined inducing labour using of a simple mechanical device, called a Foley catheter. Researchers tested the device against the use of hormone gels designed to trigger contractions. The study … found that both techniques led to similar rates of spontaneous vaginal deliveries, instrumental deliveries … and women requiring a caesarean section.

The Foley catheter also seemed to lead to fewer side effects in the women and their babies, although using the method of induction … led to longer labours …

Current guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend the use of hormone gels for induction of labour, but not the routine use of mechanical devices for induction … This new, relatively large trial has shown no important differences between the two methods used in these women. It is possible that the mechanical technique might find a place for women where there may be risks from using hormone gel …

… a high proportion of induced labours are performed because a woman’s cervix is not ready for the birth and does not open appropriately.

This randomised controlled trial compared two methods for inducing birth in women who had single babies and a reason to be induced. The women were either induced using mechanical means (a Foley catheter) or with application of a hormone gel into the vagina. A Foley catheter is a mechanical device that helps open the cervix. A fluid-filled balloon is inflated in the cervix, which stretches it until it is at an appropriate size to allow birth. The prostaglandin hormone gel mimics the natural mechanism by which a woman’s hormones cause the cervix to open.

The researchers say that hormonal induction has become the method of choice in several countries, but that use of the Foley catheter may result in similar numbers of successful inductions without the need for a caesarean section. They also say that the Foley catheter induction may have several advantages over hormone methods, such as not causing “over-stimulation” of the birthing processes …

… the caesarean section rates were much the same between the two groups: 23% of women who had been induced using a Foley catheter required a caesarean section compared to 20% of the women induced using the hormone gel … Likewise, a similar number of women in each group needed extra mechanical help with the birth, such as the use of forceps (11% in the Foley catheter group and 13% in the hormone gel group).

A greater number of women induced with the Foley catheter required a caesarean because they failed to progress in the first stage of birth (12%) than the hormone gel group (8%) … Similar proportions of each group had a caesarean section because their baby was becoming distressed (7% in the Foley catheter group compared to 9% in the hormone gel group).

… Fewer women in the prostaglandin hormone group (59%) needed an additional hormone called oxytocin to stimulate uterus contractions than in the Foley catheter group (86%). The time from the start of induction to birth was on average 29 hours (range 15-35 hours) in the Foley catheter group and 18 hours (range 12-33 hours) in the hormone gel group.

The groups did not differ in terms of painkillers taken, haemorrhage, overstimulation or health status of the baby. Fewer babies delivered with the Foley catheter (12%) needed to be admitted to the general ward (not an intensive care ward) than those induced using hormones (20%). More women treated with the hormone gel (3%) had suspected infections during birth compared to those induced with Foley catheter (1%) …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

First-time mums learn the hard way: informed mums choose private midwives

A recent article has suggested that first-time mums have overly unrealistic ideas about their birth – that it will be a natural, uncomplicated birth, when in reality it is not, for the majority. We know that women choosing care through the general hospital system will experience high rates of interventions, leading ultimately to a caesarean. But few women know that if they engage a private midwife for a hospital or homebirth, they will experience much lower rates of intervention, but with the same level of safety. Care with an eligible private midwife will attract medicare benefits, and obstetric care is readily available if it is needed. The article below described one woman’s experience of general hospital care. I can only assume that this reporter has written the article in response to the outcry about the original research.

HERVEY Bay first-time mum Jasmine Adame has experienced first-hand just how difficult childbirth can be.

And she agrees with new research … that suggests that many first-time mums are unprepared for the realities of a complicated labour.

Jasmine delivered her little girl … at Hervey Bay Hospital after spending a day and a half in labour.

In the end, she was told her labour had stalled and she had to have an emergency caesarean.

We are not told how long labour stalled for, whether she had her own midwife with her throughout her labour (unlikely since this is not available to most women through the general hospital system) and we are also not told how far through her labour she was. It is true that some caesareans are performed for “failure to progress” when the woman’s cervix is less than 3 centimeters dilated, indicating that she is not yet in established labour.

Jasmine had attended antenatal classes prior to having her first child and said it was the midwives who held these classes who gave her the best idea of what labour was actually going to be like.

Hospital classes are great at telling women about hospital policies, but independent childbirth education will inspire women with confidence about what their bodies are capable of, with the right support.

“I knew it wasn’t going to be fun.

“But I didn’t expect it to be as horrid as it was,” she said.

It sounds like she didn’t have the care of a midwife who was known and trusted. Most women I work with will experience their labour extremely positively, as if it was the best (hardest and most challenging, but oh so rewarding) experience of their life.

… The chances of having a medically uncomplicated birth were actually 21%.

This applies to women birthing in the general hospital system, where they will not be cared for by one midwife who is known to them, chosen by them and trusted by them. The chance of a medically uncomplicated birth when a woman chooses private midwifery care is around 70% – 80%. This is a huge difference.

Because she had been focused on a natural delivery, the decision to deliver the baby by caesarean took Jasmine by surprise – and the time between the decision and the birth was very swift, allowing her little time to adjust …

This is addressed during care with a private midwife, where there is ample time to explore all options and possibilities, so that there are few surprises on the day (or night!). Hour-long appointments allow plenty of time for questions and education. The possibility of a first-time mum “needing” a caesarean in the general hospital system is 25%, or one in four. Given this large minority, we would think that all women going through the hospital system would be thoroughly appraised of this possibility. In my private practice, a mere 3% first-time mums need a caesarean. This is not because we push the boundaries of safety: it is because women who are well supported, well-informed, relaxed and confident about their birth will generally start labour on their own at term, labour normally and birth their babies unassisted by any instruments or operations.

Hopefully Jasmine will choose private midwifery care with her next pregnancy (private midwifery care is available for a planned hospital birth), where she can expect an 80% – 90% chance of a vaginal birth following her caesarean in her first pregnancy. Or will she choose to go back to the general hospital system, where she has a mere 15% chance of a vaginal birth?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Delivering better maternity care

Link

Despite countless inquiries, initiatives and ministerial pledges … maternity care remains one of the NHS’s problem areas …

In recent weeks there have been two significant pieces of evidence published that will help shape practice affecting the UK’s 800,000 births a year. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced new guidelines for the NHS in England and Wales on the circumstances in which mothers-to-be should be able to have a Caesarean-section delivery.

Meanwhile the landmark Birthplace study … sought to clarify the relative risks of having a baby at home, in hospital or in a birth centre run by midwives; the study found all settings carried a low level of risk. Both documents aim to advise maternity teams on how to give mothers and their babies the best possible experience.

… It is no wonder maternity services are under pressure … England has had a 22% increase in births over the past decade …

But the maternity workforce is not just short of midwives, the roundtable heard. Of those 800,000 annual births, 94% of them take place in hospitals where doctors are present along with midwives; the others, at home (2%) and in birth centres (4%), have midwives solely in charge. But the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) believes the 2,186 senior doctors working as consultants in that area of medicine is too few. It wants the NHS to boost numbers to 3,000-3,300.

Mothers-to-be would benefit because every hospital maternity unit would have a consultant on hand 24/7 and less experienced doctors would no longer be in charge overnight and at weekends …

… “the current system of maternity care is unsustainable. You have to reconfigure”. The participant meant that some maternity units should be closed – merged, in effect – so fewer, larger childbirth centres could offer mothers a better service, partly thanks to more specialist staff handling a greater number of deliveries concentrated in the same place.

It makes little sense for large urban areas to have separate maternity units just a few miles apart, a view confirmed for the speaker by seeing that sort of setup on a recent visit to Leeds and nearby towns.

Many health professionals support the concept of reorganisation. And the reconfiguration of neonatal care services in 2003, which led to fewer units dealing with sick babies but offering enhanced care, is a potential model to follow, another participant added. But there is a major obstacle to overcome first: … To close your core maternity service is a death trap as an MP. So that will not happen,” …

… simply creating fewer, but larger, hospital units is not the answer and there needs to be more midwife-led birth centres, either standalone units or situated beside hospitals, in case a mother needs urgent medical attention …

There was also a strong consensus that the huge proportion of births occurring in hospitals, 94%, is too high. While there was support for moving towards an equal split – 33% at home, 33% in birth centres and 33% in hospital – there was also a recognition that politics, entrenched attitudes and the tightest NHS budget in a generation means that will probably remain just an aspiration for the foreseeable future.

… In 2007, Maternity Matters promised women in England a choice of birth place, but the reality is that many still do not get that. One participant working on the NHS frontline said pressure on maternity services was so great in some places that midwives who usually help women to have home births are having to work, instead, on labour wards, thus depriving those seeking a home birth of that supposedly guaranteed right.

Similarly, surveys by the Healthcare Commission and its successor as the NHS regulator for England, the Care Quality Commission, have shown the promise to women of one-to-one care from a midwife during their labour is also not honoured for as many as a quarter of mothers-to-be, who are left alone and find it stressful …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Myths and Truths of Obesity and Pregnancy

Link

Ironically, despite excessive caloric intake, many obese women are deficient in vitamins vital to a healthy pregnancy …

… Many obese women are vitamin deficient …

Forty percent are deficient in iron, 24 percent in folic acid and 4 percent in B12. This is a concern because certain vitamins, like folic acid, are very important before conception, lowering the risk of cardiac problems and spinal defects in newborns. Other vitamins, such as calcium and iron, are needed throughout pregnancy to help babies grow.

… vitamin deficiency has to do with the quality of the diet, not the quantity. Obese women tend to stray away from fortified cereals, fruits and vegetables, and eat more processed foods that are high in calories but low in nutritional value.

“Just like everybody else, women considering pregnancy or currently pregnant should get a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, lean proteins and good quality carbohydrates. Unfortunately, these are not the foods people lean towards when they overeat,” noted Thornburg. “Women also need to be sure they are taking vitamins containing folic acid before and during pregnancy.”

… In 2009, the Institute of Medicine revised its recommendations for gestational weight gain for obese women from “at least 15 pounds” to “11-20 pounds.” According to past research, obese women with excessive weight gain during pregnancy have a very high risk of complications, including indicated preterm birth, cesarean delivery, failed labor induction, large-for-gestational-age infants and infants with low blood sugar.

If a woman starts her pregnancy overweight or obese, not gaining a lot of weight can actually improve the likelihood of a healthy pregnancy …

… Obese women have increased rates of respiratory complications, and up to 30 percent experience an exacerbation of their asthma during pregnancy, a risk almost one-and-a-half times more than non-obese women.

… Breastfeeding rates are poor among obese women, with only 80 percent initiating and less than 50 percent continuing beyond six months, even though it is associated with less postpartum weight retention and should be encouraged as it benefits the health of mom and baby.

… it can be challenging for obese women to breast feed. It often takes longer for their milk to come in and they can have lower production …

Preconception care and a healthy eating and exercise program before pregnancy, that is maintained during pregnancy, can be helpful.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Balancing The Womb

Link

New research hopes to explain premature births and failed inductions of labour. The study by academics at the University of Bristol suggests a new mechanism by which the level of myosin phosphorylation is regulated in the pregnant uterus.

… phosphorylation of uterus proteins at specific amino acids have a key role in the regulation of uterine activity in labour.

A remarkable feature of the uterus … is that it remains relatively relaxed for the nine months of pregnancy … and then, during labour, it contracts forcibly and the baby is born. A special type of smooth muscle that grows and stretches during pregnancy to accommodate the fetus and the placenta forms the uterus.

Hormones such as oxytocin or prostaglandins promote labour, but the biochemical changes that allow the switch from relaxation to contractions to happen are not fully understood. This makes it difficult to predict when a woman is going to deliver. In eight to ten per cent of women delivery occurs too early … On the other hand when labour has to be induced for medical reasons, it is impossible to know whether the induction will be successful or whether it will require an emergency caesarean section …

… small biopsies of uterine tissue from women who delivered … demonstrated that contractions require both a calcium dependent pathway driven by myosin kinase and a calcium independent pathway that regulates the activity of myosin phosphatase …

… “This study has increased our understanding of the biochemical changes underlying uterine activity and may help in the design of better drugs to prevent preterm labour or to induce labour successfully at term, benefiting many thousands of women and their babies.” …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Baby’s Weight Affected By Mothers’ Weight Before And During Pregnancy

Link

A new study … reveals that both pre-pregnant weight (body mass index, BMI) and weight gain in pregnancy are important predictors of babies’ birthweight. This is important since high birthweight may also predict adult overweight.

… Results of the study showed that birthweight of the newborn child increased with increasing maternal pre-pregnant BMI, and that offspring birthweight also increased with increasing weight gain of the mother during pregnancy.

Every increase in one kg of pre-pregnancy BMI increased birthweight with 22.4 g. A subsequent increase in weight gain during pregnancy of 10 kg increased birthweight with 224 g.

… “Encouraging women to attain a healthy weight before conception and keep a moderate weight gain during pregnancy is important to avoid high or excessive birthweight in offspring,” …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Older mums in new age of parenting

Link

Almost a quarter of first-time Australian mothers are giving birth after the age of 35 … almost 6 per cent higher than the figure in 2000 …

… the number of mothers in the older age bracket would continue to grow for a range of reasons including lifestyle, economic factors and career choices.

“There’s a really strong tendency for women these days to get established in their careers or job and working for a period of time for their own self-fulfilment but also because of the economic circumstances,” …

… women now tended to have children over a shorter period – leaving less time between births – because they were older.

… the average maternal age in 2009 was 30, compared with 29 a decade earlier …

… older women faced a greater risk of complications during pregnancy including miscarriage, high blood pressure and diabetes …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Inducing labor doesn’t raise risk of uterine rupture in VBAC

Link

Inducing labor doesn’t increase the risk of uterine rupture, once length of labor is taken into account, in women attempting vaginal delivery after a cesarean delivery …

… After accounting for length of labor using a time-to-event analysis, researchers found that the risk of uterine rupture with induced labor was similar to that of spontaneous labor … Women with an initial unfavorable cervical exam (<4 cm dilation) had a higher risk of uterine rupture with induced labor than spontaneous labor ... and those with cervical dilation <2 cm and 2 cm-3.9 cm on the initial exam were at greatest risk.

Women who undergo induced labor may spend more time in active labor than those with spontaneous labor ...

Interesting research, as common understanding has it that induction is never a wise choice in a VBAC, and many women who need an induction who have previously had a caesarean are advised to undergo a repeat caesarean. If induction can be safely carried out, this would help to reduce our high caesarean rates.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Treatment Halves Preterm Birth Rate

Link

The risk of preterm birth and neonatal mortality and morbidity declined significantly in asymptomatic women with a … short cervix treated with vaginal progesterone …

The treatment was associated with a 40% to 50% reduction in the risk of preterm birth, a 43% reduction in total neonatal morbidity and mortality, and a 45% reduction in the frequency of low birth weight.

… “Our analysis provides compelling evidence that vaginal progesterone prevents preterm birth and reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a short cervix,” …

“Importantly, progesterone reduced early preterm birth. These immature babies are at the greatest risk for complications, death, and long-term disability. Progesterone also decreased a fraction of late preterm births, which are the most common preterm deliveries.”

… Progesterone has a key role in maintenance of pregnancy …

“Vaginal progesterone was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth <33 weeks of gestation in both women with a single gestation and no previous preterm birth, as well as in women with a single gestation and at least one previous spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation," ...

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Abruption Among Most Likely Causes of Stillbirth

Link

The most common causes of stillbirth were obstetric conditions such as abruption and complications of multiple gestation and by placental abnormalities …

Almost 30% of stillbirths in a large cohort study were due to obstetric conditions, while placental abnormalities accounted for nearly a quarter …

… having had a previous stillbirth was the strongest risk factor for another one …

… Both studies were part of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group, which was convened to assess risk factors for, and causes of, stillbirth in the U.S. Stillbirth was defined as fetal death at 20 weeks’ gestation or later.

Thus far, there’s been a dearth of information on the condition, which makes it challenging to design prevention strategies …

… About a third of stillbirths occurred between 20 and 24 weeks’ gestation, and half occurred before 28 weeks …

The most common cause (29.3%) was an obstetric condition, such as abruption and complications of multiple gestation, or related to the constellation of preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and cervical insufficiency.

Placental abnormalities was the second most common cause (23.6%), followed by fetal genetic structural abnormalities (13.7%), infection (12.9%), umbilical cord abnormalities (10.4%), hypertensive disorders (9.2%), and other maternal medical conditions (7.8%).

… More intrapartum stillbirths had infectious causes … while antepartum stillbirths had a higher proportion of placental causes … and fetal genetic structural abnormalities …

… pregnancy history, specifically, having a previous stillbirth, was the strongest risk factor for the condition …

Other risk factors associated with stillbirth included … Diabetes … Maternal age 40 years or older … Maternal AB blood type … History of drug addiction … Smoking during the three months before pregnancy … Obesity/overweight …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Stress In Early Pregnancy Can Lead To Shorter Pregnancies, More Pre-term Births And Fewer Baby Boys

Link

Stress in the second and third months of pregnancy can shorten pregnancies, increase the risk of pre-term births and may affect the ratio of boys to girls being born …

… women who experienced a severe quake … during their second and third months of pregnancy had shorter pregnancies and were at higher risk of delivering pre-term (before 37 weeks gestation). The pregnancies of women exposed to the earthquake in the second month of pregnancy were on average 0.17 weeks (1.3 days) shorter than those in the unaffected areas of Chile. The pregnancies of those exposed in the third month were 0.27 weeks (1.9 days) shorter. Normally, about six in 100 women had a pre-term birth, but among women exposed to the earthquake in the third month of pregnancy, this rose by 3.4%, meaning more than nine women in 100 delivered their babies early.

The effect was most pronounced for female births; the probability of pre-term birth increased by 3.8% if exposure to the quake occurred in the third month, and 3.9% if it occurred in the second month. In contrast there was no statistically significant effect seen in male births.

As the stress of the earthquake had greater effect on pre-term births in girls rather than boys, the researchers had to make adjustments for this when calculating the effect of stress on the sex ratio: the ratio of male to female live births. They found that there was a decline in the sex ratio among those exposed to the earthquake in the third month of gestation of 5.8%.

… “Generally, there are more male than female live births. The ratio of male to female births is approximately 51:49 … Our findings indicate a 5.8% decline in this proportion, which would translate into a ratio of 45 male births per 100 births, so that there are now more female than male births …

Previous research has suggested that in times of stress women are more likely to miscarry male foetuses because they grow larger than females and therefore require greater investment of resources by the mother; they may also be less robust than females and may not adapt their development to a stressful environment in the womb. “Our findings on a decreased sex ratio support this hypothesis and suggest that stress may affect the viability of male births,” … “In contrast, among female conceptions, stress exposure appears not to affect the viability of the conception but rather, the length of gestation.”

… possible mechanisms to explain their findings could involve the placenta, which sets the duration of the pregnancy, and the effect of the stress hormone cortisol on the placenta’s function …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Forceps delivery tied to lower brain injury risk

Link

When babies need help coming into the world, forceps may carry less risk of newborn seizures compared with vacuum deliveries or Cesarean section …

In recent years, forceps have fallen out of favor when it comes to aiding a difficult childbirth. Vacuum devices are more often used, while C-section rates have surged.

… that’s all despite a lack of evidence that vacuum or C-section deliveries are actually safer for newborns compared with forceps …

… newborns delivered by forceps were 45 percent less likely to suffer a seizure than those born via vacuum pump or C-section.

On the other hand, babies delivered by C-section were less likely to have one type of bleeding around the brain — known as subdural hemorrhage.

The risks of any of those complications were low, whatever the type of delivery …

Forceps have often been labelled riskier for mothers and babies than a vacuum extraction delivery, however this study questions that belief. My experience has been that a forceps delivery, in the hands of a skilled obstetrician, is perfectly safe for the mother and baby. I have found that forceps are more likely than a vacuum to result in a vaginal birth, while more attempted vacuum deliveries “fail” and end up going to caesarean section. Fewer forceps deliveries “fail”. With a vacuum extraction, the baby is essentially pulled out by its scalp, whereas with forceps, the baby is pulled out by the body parts of its face and skull. I think this method is kinder to the baby. The best approach though is to promote unassisted vaginal birth, where the woman pushes her baby out (or breathes her baby out) without any instruments. This is most likely if the woman has had no pain relief in labour, is assisted to birth in an upright position and is supported by a known and supportive midwife.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Simulator to predict chance of caesarean?

Link

Traditionally, doctors and midwives have used a technique called pelvimetry to measure the pelvis and try to determine its adequacy for giving birth. But pelvic size is just one factor in how smoothly labor will go, rendering the method largely insufficient.

Scientists in France have been working to take some of the guesswork out of labor predictions … their newly developed software, called Predibirth, predicts birth outcomes quite accurately.

The researchers used their software to process magnetic resonance images of 24 pregnant women, capturing the pelvis and fetus, and then simulating 72 possible trajectories the baby’s head might take through the birth canal. The program then uses this data to score the mother’s chances of having a normal (vaginal) birth.

… Of the 24 women in the study, the 13 who delivered normally all had highly favorable birth outcome scores. Three women who had high-risk scores underwent elective C-sections. Of the five women who underwent emergency C-section, the three with obstructed labor had high-risk scores, and the two who experienced heart rhythm abnormalities had mildly favorable or favorable scores.

More accurate measurements of labor risks might not only keep C-section rates lower and help identify necessary C-sections before they become emergencies, but these measurements could also better inform those who want to deliver at home whether it is safe to do so.

I wonder if all of those women had undergone extensive preparation for birth and had sought continuity of midwifery care? Of 24 women, only 13 delivered vaginally. That is only 54%! Private midwifery care generally had rates of normal birth up around 90%.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Caesarean link to respiratory infections in babies

Link

A new study from Perth has found that babies born by elective caesarean are more likely to be admitted to hospital with a serious respiratory infection, bronchiolitis, in the first year of life.

This was a ten-year study that analysed the birth data of over 212,000 babies.

Bronchiolitis is generally caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and is one of the most common reasons for babies to be admitted to hospital. Bronchiolitis also has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of asthma in children, and it is known that babies born by elective caesarean experience more asthma than babies who were born vaginally or born by caesarean after labour had commenced.

Previous research found an increased risk of hospital admissions for respiratory infections in children less than 2 years of age, delivered by elective caesarean.

It is thought that labour stimulates the baby’s immune system and strengthens it. babies who are born by elective caesarean do not experience labour, and therefore their immune systems are not primed in the same way.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

New study on risk factors for gestational diabetes

Link

… One type of diabetes, gestational diabetes (GDM), is first diagnosed during pregnancy. It can cause complications to the mother and fetus during pregnancy and can develop into type 2 diabetes following pregnancy. A new study … reported that age and body mass index (BMI) are significant risk factors in whether a woman will develop GDM. Furthermore, those factors are particularly relevant in Black African and South Asian women. Early detection is essential for the effective treatment of GDM. Known risk factors include BMI, advanced maternal age, previous GDM, delivery of a large infant, family history of diabetes, and race. … despite knowledge of these risk factors, few studies have looked at how they interact to influence GDM risk; therefore, they conducted a retrospective study of associations between GDM and maternal age, BMI, and race, as well as how the factors interact with one another. The study compared 1,688 women who developed GDM between 1988 and 2000 with 172,632 women who did not …

… The researchers found an association between greater maternal age and risk of GDM and between increasing BMI and risk of GDM; however, the effects varied greatly between women of different races. The baseline comparison group was white Europeans aged 20 to 24 years. White European women aged 30 to 34 years had twice the risk of developing GDM; furthermore, those 40 years of age and older had a four-fold increase in risk. Increasing age was associated with a much larger increase in risk among black African women. Compared to baseline women, those aged 25 to 29 years had 3.40 times greater risk, those aged 35 to 39 years had a 13.67 times greater risk, and those aged 40 years and older had a 59.20 times greater risk of developing GDM.

Compared with white Europeans with normal BMIs, black Africans and South Asians were more likely to develop GDM regardless of BMI. The authors concluded: “Advancing maternal age and BMI are more important risk factors for GDM in South Asian and Black African women than in White European or Black Caribbean women.”

This study contributes valuable information for the detection of gestational diabetes. Much work has been done in this area on the past two years and testing recommendations are in the process of being changed.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Evolution Offers Clues to Leading Cause of Death During Childbirth

Link

Unusual features of the human placenta may be the underlying cause of postpartum hemorrhage …

… postpartum hemorrhage accounts for nearly 35 percent … of the 358,000 worldwide annual maternal deaths during childbirth.

Despite its prevalence, the causes of postpartum hemorrhage are unknown … While common in humans, postpartum hemorrhage is rare in other mammals …

… Previous studies on postpartum hemorrhage have focused on how it can be treated and on recognizing its associated risk factors …

In humans, the invasiveness of the placenta into the uterine wall and the subsequent takeover of maternal blood vessels appear to be greater than in nonhumans … This suggests a link between placental invasiveness early in pregnancy and blood loss at delivery, when the placenta separates from the uterine wall.

Research by Abrams and Rutherford suggests that hormones produced by trophoblasts — cells formed during the first stage of pregnancy that provide nutrients to the embryo and develop into a large part of the placenta, and that guide the interaction with the uterus — may provide an early predictor of risk.

“Biomarkers of postpartum hemorrhage that could be used early in pregnancy would allow women to make informed decisions about their choice of birthing site and medical care based on their risk,” Abrams said. This biomarker hypothesis has not yet been studied.

… In a normal birth, the placenta begins to separate from the uterine wall before delivery. Bleeding at the site is normally stopped by the constriction of blood vessels due to the contraction and retraction of uterine muscles …

There are two major risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage … The leading factor is uterine contractions that are too weak to stop bleeding. The cause of this is unclear …

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Caesarean link to infant respiratory infections

Link

Babies born by elective caesareans are more likely to suffer a serious respiratory infection in their first year of life …

The decade-long study into the incidence of Bronchiolitis found that babies born by elective caesarean were 11 per cent more likely to be hospitalised with the infection than babies delivered by other means.

Researchers at Perth’s Telethon Institute for Child Health Research analysed birth data and hospital records for 212,068 babies over a 10-year period in WA for the study …

… while the increase was relatively modest, it highlighted the risk to a child’s immune system when elective caesareans were the chosen birth method.

“We compared elective caesareans with other modes of delivery because with elective caesareans we could be confident that labour had not begun and therefore the baby would not have been exposed to [natural] chemicals that are released during the labour process,” Dr Moore said.

“It is increasingly plausible that delivery without labour could impair a newborn’s immune system and may also explain the known link between c-sections and an increased risk of asthma.”

… Bronchiolitis is generally caused by the common respiratory synctial virus and is one of the most common reasons for babies to be admitted to hospital.

She said that while most children recover from the infection quickly, it can make the child more prone to other respiratory illnesses such as asthma later in life.

… the research … pointed to the need for more research into the suspected role of various chemicals that are produced by mothers during labour in priming a newborn’s immune system.

“Given that caesarean rates are rising in Australia, this potential impact on the immune system might be another factor that parents and doctors may consider if choosing a caesarean for other than medical reasons,” she said.

“As it’s the first time we have reported such an association, it’s really important that the message get out there that women and their clinicians need to consider this when opting for a caesarean.”

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Turbulent times

A lot has been happening in the world of homebirth and midwifery. Many will have read the articles about homebirth, freebirth, midwives and maternity care that are appearing in our papers on a daily basis.

I have not posted for a couple of weeks now, for three main reasons: one I have been really busy with my practice which has not been this busy for about two years. Second, I attended the Australian College of Midwives National Conference – the ACM worked really hard to deliver an excellent conference that was appreciated by all. I had the fantastic opportunity to meet midwives from around Australia and share ideas, discuss practice and talk birthy things. I was pleased that the conference was in Sydney, because as those of you who know me will know, in my non-midwifery life I rescue and care for injured and orphaned native birds, and so I was able to make a trip home most days of the conference to feed everyone at home. They were hungry but they all survived! I digress. The third reason for not posting was that the recent issues have made me re-assess things like responsibility, accountability, safety, choice, control, autonomy, beneficence, informed decision-making and many other issues. I have no answers to report. Just lots of reflection.

Midwifery and maternity care are going through turbulent times and as professionals and organisations, I feel that we have done a major disservice to women that they feel safer birthing at home – with or without a registered midwife – in the presence of risk factors – because they so strongly believe that the hospital system will not enable them to birth in the manner of their choosing. It is a sad reflection on the health system and the professionals who work within it. Women who cannot access midwifery care because they are planning a VBAC. Women who are told that if they insist on birthing vaginally with twins, they must accept continuous monitoring, induction, epidural and birth in stirrups for twin two. Women whose only option is to birth in a hospital that is two hours from their home. We have all heard the stories.

My biggest disappointment is the lack of midwife admitting rights. We are one year into the maternity reforms on November 1 this year. We have eligible midwives with Medicare provider numbers, ordering tests and working with doctors to provide safe care to women and babies – yet we cannot access hospitals to provide this care. I well understand that there are a lot of hurdles to be overcome with midwife admitting rights, and life has taught me that nothing in life is impossible.

The release of the homebirth position statement – which I fully support as an evidence-based and safe way to provide care – combined with the lack of midwife admitting rights, is disastrous for women and midwives. Higher risk women are forced into a position of birthing in hospital without their midwife if the midwife complies with the position statement but has no admitting rights – otr else freebirthing, potentially with disastrous consequences. Overnight, this change occurred and women are fuming.

It is impossible to believe, but an eligible midwife who crosses all the “T”s and dots all the “I”s will suffer incredibly in terms of restriction of clientele, however if she were to remove her name from the register – something that I understand is very easy to do – she may do just as she pleases with no accountability, regulation or practice standards. Midwives are placed in the untenable situation of a dwindling practice, or unregistering and having a flourishing practice. Until admitting rights are in place, midwives will have no place to birth with their higher-risk clients. This situation does not see the Government supporting midwives or women. It is creating a disaster.

The various politics of homebirth and midwifery has created an enormous rift between midwives. It seems that there are the bunch who have elected to become eligible, forge ahead with collaborative arrangements, push for admitting rights and accept the increased regulation that is upon us as our profession matures. The other group opposes the increased regulation and restriction of choice, supports midwife- (or non-midwife)-attended homebirth for any woman who wants it and really wants things to just go back to how they used to be, before insurance became mandatory. Many midwives sit comfortable in the middle of this debate. It is sad to watch such division and animosity amongst midwives. We seem to lack a capacity of saying, “We don’t share each other’s vision and we have made different choices, but we are midwives and we will support each other”. As one midwife said to me, “We are each doing the best we can for the women we care for and we’re making the best of a rotten situation”.

I know 2012 will be better than 2011. Who knows? Maybe it’ll be an historic year where for the very first time, women will birth on their own terms, with their chosen midwife, at home or in hospital. I wonder how many women will insist on homebirth in spite of significant risks, if they are able to birth in hospital with their own midwife and in the manner of their choosing.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Has labour become a competition?

Sitting at mother’s groups, listening and observing, a general theme emerges when mothers speak of their recent births: competition. Who had the most traumatic birth? Who had the longest labour? And I came to wonder what purpose this competition serves.

I wonder if it serves a few purposes.

It reinforces birth as a scary, dangerous, even deadly experience that really must occur in hospital. “Thank god I was in hospital. My baby would have died if I had been at home!”

It validates the experience of the woman who had the most traumatic labour. The woman who wins the most-traumatic-birth-competition feels good, as any winner would do. Why would she want to give up this good feeling? After-all, she’s been traumatised by the birth and it feels good to finally have a group of women say, “wow, that was really bad!” rather than, “at least you have a healthy baby”. This reinforcement relieves the woman of her quest to find out what went wrong, and more importantly why, in attempt to avoid the same situation from occurring next time. Hence, “I’ll just go for a ceasar next time” if often heard and the other mothers agree that yes, since this woman’s birth was the most traumatic of all the births in the group, this woman is certainly justified in “going for a caesar” next time.

Other themes that emerge are an avoidance of self-responsibility, empowerment, ownership and belief in birth as a process that a woman’s body can do, if let to labour as nature intends. The most-traumatic-birth-competition rarely centres on the woman’s individual choices and decisions. It focuses on what was done to her and what was out of her control. Have we lost the ability to have the courage of our convictions, to trust our instincts, to believe in ourselves, that we hand over responsibility for our births to a stranger / professional? Often times, the mother who has had the most traumatic birth will have handed over the most responsibility for her birth. This protects the mother from any guilt: one the one hand, it was her care provider’s fault if things didn’t go to plan, and on the other hand, thank goodness she had her careprovider to sort things out and rescue her and her baby from the birth. Either way, the woman bears no responsibility for the outcome that was less-than-desirable.

The mother who had the most natural birth often doesn’t speak. She’s in the minority after all. No-one wants to hear about her amazing home waterbirth. And indeed, if she dares to speak of her positive, empowering experience, she is met with disapproval for daring to speak while Mrs Jones is re-living her nightmare to the group. The natural birth mother is labeled “odd” for ever pursuing a natural birth, and even odder for actually achieving it. She best not speak or her views will only isolate her from the group, and motherhood can be isolating enough. So now the situation is that the competition exists entirely of traumatised mothers, all seeking to be awarded the prize for having had the biggest tear, longest labour, greatest number of interventions and biggest baby. Each wants to feel that although the circumstances were not ideal, there was nothing they could have done to avert such outcomes, that they were mere victims in the unpredictable process of birth. They went to a top private hospital with the best obstetrician in Sydney (funny that they’re all “the best”) and that’s where their responsibility ends.

It’s hard to do the self-reflection and question decisions you made. Maybe you’ll learn that other decisions would have led to better outcomes and this starts the painful cycle of regret for something that cannot be changed. However, it’s ok to honour that journey and know that at the time, we made the best decisions we could have made, but now that we know differently, we will choose differently.

When this happens, maybe the competition will be on different terms. I live for the day when the competition is for the most satisfying, safe and empowering birth experience with the woman coming away with her dignity intact and feeling respected and cared for throughout her experience. It’s totally possible!

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Private midwife at public hospital

Our local newspaper wrote an article about the model of care I am able to offer women:

THE owner of Essential Birth Consulting at Bexley, Melissa Maimann, 33, has become the first private midwife in Sydney to be accredited to deliver babies in a public hospital.

She said this was exciting news for expectant mums who want a personalised delivery but might be experiencing a high-risk pregnancy.

Ms Maimann said her model of care was unique in Australia because it included access to a back-up obstetrician.

“I am able to support women with risk-associated pregnancies because obstetric care is available,” she said. “This is a real benefit to women as often those with high-risk pregnancies are limited to obstetric care with little, if any, midwifery input.”

Ms Maimann, who established Essential Birth Consulting five years ago, has helped deliver about 76 babies.

She was profiled in the Leader last December for becoming the first private midwife in St George to receive accreditation to provide Medicare-funded private midwifery services. This has equated to savings of about $2500 a client.

Ms Maimann limits bookings to an average of two births each month to ensure a high quality service for families. She supports natural births, including water birth, and vaginal birth after caesarean, vaginal twin and vaginal breech births.

“We know that continuity of care is the single most important factor for women in the pregnancy and birth care and I am proud to offer it,” she said.

“Women may have care conveniently in their home or in my Bexley clinic.”

There were 295,700 registered births in Australia in 2009, Australian Bureau of Statistics figures showed.

Details: 0400 418 448 or essentialbirthconsulting.com.au

China cuts childbirth mortality rate by promoting hospital births

link

China has slashed the death rate of newborn babies by almost two-thirds in 12 years by promoting hospital births …

Deaths fell from 24.7 per 1,000 live births in 1996 to 9.3 in 2008. Only half of women gave birth in hospital at the start of that period, whereas by the end almost all did so outside the most deprived rural areas.

… “It’s a combination of strengthening facilities, training providers, equipping them with the skills and drugs to offer better care – and, through insurance, encouraging families to give birth in hospitals.

There was still some disparity, with babies in poorer areas four times as likely to die as in wealthier urban areas – apparently reflecting poorer quality services in township hospitals.

“In urban China, babies born in hospital have a very low newborn mortality rate of 5 per 1,000, almost that of the UK, which is 3 to 4 per 1,000,” …

… It is also on course to reduce the maternal mortality ratio by three-quarters …

… the figure [maternal mortality] had fallen from 34.2 per 100,000 to 30 out of 100,000 last year …

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

However we may perceive our public health system …

We have to agree that it is far better than what is described below. Although we have waiting lists, lack of continuity and a perception of impersonal care, our public health system does deliver a basic and safe level of care, and we are so fortunate to live in a country that provides emergency care free to everyone. Anyone who has an emergency is able to access emergency care, whether or not they have a Medicare card. We have a reciprocal health care agreement with certain countries to enable us to care for people from those countries, and for people visiting our country with no reciprocal health agreement and no private health insurance, we provide the basic necessary care to maintain safety. The woman below was not so fortunate.

Link

The contractions had started at dawn. Cecilia Nambozo, a teacher at Busamaga Primary School in Mbale Municipality … checked into a hospital … so she could give birth with expert attention at her disposal.

But that was not to be, for more than 10 hours after Nambozo checked into Mbale Regional Referral Hospital to bring unto the world a life, she was ignored, neglected and writhing in pain. Her crime? She did not have the Shs300,000 the hospital medical staff demanded before they could attend to her. And so she wasted away as her husband, Mr Richard Wesamoyo, made desperate runs around the village to raise the money.

… Nambozo arrived in the hospital at 6am but was reportedly neglected in the Labour Ward until 8pm when she breathed her last. Even then, it is the hospital cleaners who helped remove the baby from her womb … The doctors demanded for Shs300,000, which we could not raise …

… after three hours of waiting and sensing that Nambozo’s situation was deteriorating, she approached a midwife and asked her to attend to her as the husband ran to the village to sell property and raise the money but the midwife and a doctor allegedly declined.

“At about 6pm, Nambozo started gasping; she fell on the floor and was bleeding. That was when the doctor responded and took her into the theatre but it was too late; her life could not be saved. She died.” she said.

The doctor emerged from the theatre after about 10 minutes and announced that both the child and the mother had died …

… his humiliation was iced when medics abandoned his wife’s body in the Labour Ward with the foetus in her womb. He said the body was removed by cleaners.

“They rolled the bed out in the open and started operating her naked for all to see. It was very dehumanising, humiliating for her to be stripped naked by cleaners,” … He said they had been going for antenatal check-ups at the hospital and the midwives had told them the baby was big and that it would be difficult for her to have a normal birth. Apparently, the midwives had recommended a caesarian operation for Nambozo.

… the baby weighed 5.2 kilogrammes and … Nambozo died due to … [uterine rupture]… due to neglect after the uterus malfunctioned, Nambozo had bled to death.

“This lady reached the hospital at 6am and pleaded with the medical workers for an operation because she knew her status but the medics refused to attend to her until her uterus [ruptured]. “… this is not the first case at this hospital; many women have died in labour out of neglect.” …

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Probiotics tied to lower risk of pregnancy problem

Link

Pregnant women who regularly have milk or yogurt with “good” bacteria may be less likely to suffer the late-pregnancy complication known as pre-eclampsia …

… 4.1 percent developed pre-eclampsia, compared with 5.6 percent of women who did not consume probiotic food.

… probiotic consumers still had a 20 percent lower risk of pre-eclampsia …

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

I’m pregnant. Who should I go to for care? A Midwife or an Obstetrician?

Private Midwife:

  • Provides autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care for women who are experiencing normal, healthy pregnancies
  • Provides care in consultation with an obstetrician when a woman’s pregnancy has risk factors (eg high blood pressure, prem labour, concern for baby’s growth, gestational diabetes etc)
  • Transfers responsibility for care to an obstetrician if complications emerge and continues to provide care within the midwifery scope of practice
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Private Obstetrician:

  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Receives referrals from midwives for women with risk-associated pregnancies or births
  • Always provides labour and birth care (including caesarean) in collaboration with a midwife
  • Obstetric care on average results in a high degree of intervention such as induction, epidural, caesarean and episiotomy
  • Provides brief in-hospital consultations after the baby is born, followed by a 6-week check
  • Pregnancy appointments are generally no more than 15 minutes in duration
  • Collaborative care: private midwife and private obstetrician

  • Receive autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care from one midwife and one obstetrician regardless of risk factors
  • No transfer of care if risk factors emerge
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Supports women to birth naturally, including with twins, a breech baby or a VBAC
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Are home births safe?

    Link

    Jon Barrett is accustomed to dealing with anxious mothers-to-be. As chief of maternal-fetal medicine at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, one of the main concerns he hears from patients involves unnecessary medical interventions during delivery.

    He acknowledges that the rate of Caesarian sections and episiotomies is far too high … But he’s more unnerved by what that phenomenon appears to be triggering: a surge in demand for home births.

    Barrett’s concerns about home births stem from experience. Between 1990 and 1992, he was part of an obstetric “flying squad” in Newcastle, England. His job was to travel, by ambulance, to the bedsides of women whose home births had gone awry …

    Two incidents are particularly vivid. The first occurred in winter. Navigating the ambulance through snowy laneways, Barrett’s team arrived to find two midwives frantically working over an unconscious woman. She was in shock and hemorrhaging badly. “I’ve never seen so much blood in my life.” She survived, but only after a massive blood transfusion in hospital. The second woman developed pre-eclampsia, which caused seizures, and went into cardiac arrest as his ambulance pulled up. His team was able to restart her heart and intubate her before rushing her to hospital. She also survived. He says both conditions were unpredictable and could have occurred anywhere, “But I know they would have come less close to dying if it would have happened in hospital.”

    Unlike some of his colleagues on the squad who witnessed fetal deaths during home births, if Barrett’s memories were reduced to pure data in a typical study, they’d be unremarkable. That’s because most home birth data measures deaths, not complications, and his patients survived. “If you want a retrospective study, there’s no maternal mortality there . . . and so is that safe? No, it’s just bloody lucky.”

    The question of how best to measure home birth safety has long plagued researchers … what is counted — mortality rates for mothers and babies during childbirth — offers little insight on the maternal side because … maternal deaths from childbirth are rare … But stories like Barrett’s suggest the numbers don’t tell the whole story. In his view, the bottom line should be obvious: “Sooner or later you’re going to get a disaster because that’s the nature of obstetrics.” He adds, “It’s very rare that it will happen, but it’s got to happen more in home birth.”

    That assertion is at the heart of a furious debate in the birthing community. Mothers who choose to give birth at home often cite research showing there are fewer medical interventions and no increased risk. But in the past year, a new study has emerged that contradicts this. It shows that home births are associated with significantly higher death rates for babies. If correct, the rights of women to control their own bodies and birth experience would seem to conflict with the best interests of their children.

    When the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) released the now-controversial “Wax Study” last summer, it created the medical equivalent of the Rift Valley amongst birthing experts … [It] confirmed significant benefits to mothers who gave birth at home, including less hemorrhaging, vaginal tearing and epidural use, and fewer infections and Caesarean sections. Unfortunately, these benefits seemed to occur at the baby’s expense: … the report showed that neonatal deaths (defined as deaths within 28 days of birth) were two to three times higher for home births. Clearly, no woman who chooses home birth believes she’s jeopardizing her baby’s health, but the study suggested such faith in the safety of home birthing is undermined by medical evidence. For those who accepted Wax’s results, the benefits of giving birth at home suddenly appeared trivial compared to the risks.

    In many ways, Wax’s study was groundbreaking … a meta-analysis, combined and re-analyzed existing studies, in order to create a bigger sample and, ideally, a more accurate result. He looked at more than 230 peer-reviewed papers published between 1950 and 2009, and selected a dozen that compared planned home births with planned hospital births by low-risk mothers in industrialized countries (Australia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada and the U.S.). The study’s vast scope—it encompassed more than 500,000 deliveries—boosted its credibility. As one doctor put it, “half a million births cuts out a lot of noise.”

    Perhaps, but the momentary silence was followed by an outraged roar from home birth supporters, including some whose research showed very different results. “The Wax study is full of mathematical errors,” says Patti Janssen, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Population and Public Health, and lead author of a 2009 cohort study that showed home births to be as safe as hospital births, for women and babies. “The design was wrong, and the calculations were wrong, and it just has to be thrown out the window.” …

    … Wax initially defended his work, but then began refusing interviews … As a flood of letters poured into the AJOG … the publication convened an independent panel to examine the main complaints. In April, it published a sample of those letters, along with a detailed response from Wax. It also released the panel’s conclusion that the study did not need to be retracted.

    But the debate has continued, and gained force, in the wake of a second study … out of the Netherlands … it concluded that babies born to low-risk women, under a midwife’s care (in hospital or at home) are more than twice as likely to die as those born to high-risk women who give birth under an obstetrician.

    Although these results were specific to Holland, and may indicate problems in the way the Dutch system categorizes women as “low- risk,” the study nevertheless provided fresh ammunition to those who believe babies are best delivered by obstetricians, and added fuel to the home birth debate. More letters began to fly, adding to the stack of seemingly contradictory information through which pregnant women are required to sift in order to make an educated decision.

    Nathalie Waite could be the poster mother for the perfect home birth. Waite’s considerations were largely pragmatic when she decided, two years ago, that her fifth baby should be born at home. She had four children attending three different Toronto schools, no nanny, and wanted her delivery to disrupt life as little as possible. It wasn’t a decision she made lightly. Her husband was nervous, but Waite’s midwife reassured them both. They lived near a hospital. Two attending midwives would be in close contact with Waite’s obstetrician and, at the slightest sign of trouble, an ambulance would be in her driveway. Most importantly, Waite knew her own body. She’d had four hospital births. During the two deliveries in which she’d fought … for a natural birth she’d experienced far less pain …

    Had she known what a home delivery would be like, Waite says none of her children would have been born in hospital. “It was purely beautiful.” … “it just felt so natural. It just felt right.”

    This is why home births are special, says Anne Wilson, president of the Canadian Association of Midwives. “It’s a non-medicalized environment where birth becomes a normal part of your family life.” …

    … there is no debating the fact that home births have lower intervention rates. And everyone, on both sides of the argument, agrees that hospital intervention rates are too high …

    His daughter’s birth, in Kingston, Ont., in 2007, was such “a spectacular experience” he and his wife decided to repeat it at their new home in Guelph this year. Unfortunately, their son was born with fluid in his lungs, which concerned their midwife enough to send them to hospital. Everything they experienced from that point on, Shaw says, reinforced their preconceptions. Their son was given blood tests, a chest X-ray and an IV for a condition Shaw believes would have cleared up on its own after several hours. They had to fight for permission to breastfeed … and, he says, when the pediatrician went home without leaving instructions for release, their son remained in an incubator for an additional 15 hours. “Our rights were completely taken away and doctors more or less said this is what we’re going to do to your baby and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

    … Shaw’s mistrust of the medical system runs deep. “I’ve hung around scientists enough to be skeptical of everything I’m told,” … He and his wife refused vitamin K and erythromycin ointment for their children, two treatments hospitals and midwives administer as standard protocol after birth. (Vitamin K ensures the baby’s blood can clot until it starts making the vitamin itself, and erythromycin is an antibiotic that protects against infections from the birth canal that can cause blindness.) …

    In many ways, Shaw and Waite represent opposite ends of the home birth spectrum. Certainly Shaw’s rejection of many of the fundamental tenets of modern medicine contrasts with Waite’s attempt to adapt its benefits to a home birth. But they share an important piece of common ground: both chose to deliver their babies with the help of a midwife.

    Freebirthers, women who deliver without assistance (and often shun prenatal care), represent the smallest sub-section of home birth mothers, and aren’t included in studies on home birth safety. Among their most famous advocates is Janet Fraser, an Australian woman who made famous the term “birth rape” to describe an emergency episiotomy during the birth of her son. “I don’t care if you don’t like the word or the idea, it’s real so get used to it,” … In 2009, Fraser’s baby daughter died after five days of home labour. She continues to advocate for freebirth.

    Freebirthers make most midwives nervous and they horrify obstetricians. Freebirth is the equivalent of playing “Russian roulette with your child,” says André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). “You don’t play with a child’s life. Especially not where [health care is] free.” That said, the SOGC does believe that midwife-assisted home births are “a reasonable alternative for low-risk women.”

    Yet, asked if he would consider home birth a reasonable option for his family, Lalonde is unequivocal. “No. Definitely not.” He falls back on experience for explanation. “I’ve participated in over 6,000 deliveries in my career and I know that everything looks very fine and suddenly disaster strikes.”

    That conflict between medical experience and faith in a woman’s body to deliver naturally lies at the heart of the home birth debate. But is the concept of natural childbirth in danger of being romanticized? … There is a documentary, popular amongst home birth advocates, entitled Orgasmic Birth; its website invites viewers to “witness the passion as birth is revealed as an integral part of woman’s sexuality and a neglected human right.” Ami McKay’s award-winning novel The Birth House makes a compelling case for home births to a more mainstream audience. In it, the doctor is portrayed as a condescending, patriarchal figure who knocks out his protesting patients with ether, then yanks out their babies. In contrast, the methods of midwife Dora Rare are equally suspect (think mandrake root and witchcraft) yet portrayed with exquisite humanity …

    That kind of experience need not be exclusive to home birth, insist obstetricians. “We should be working to make the environment of the hospital conducive to the home birth experience, rather than having more deliveries at home,” Sunnybrook’s Barrett says.

    But midwives like Anne Wilson maintain there’s nothing to equal the experience of a home birth. “If I am delivering a baby in the hospital, you’re a guest in my house. If I’m delivering a baby at home, I’m a guest in your house. And there’s quite a lot of psychological difference there.” Wilson hopes the demand for home births will continue to rise in Canada … she believes that all low-risk women, including those who choose to give birth in hospital, should deliver with a midwife.

    That’s the system adopted by the Netherlands — and the Evers study suggests it’s failing dramatically …

    “I don’t think it’s that important to debate whether [homebirth is] safe, safer or not safe. I think it’s very important to debate how we can make home birth safer because women are going to do it anyway.”

    In the United States, one way to improve safety is by improving midwifery. Training and regulations are a patchwork across the country; in some states, midwives aren’t even required to finish high school. In that respect, the U.S. lags many industrialized countries, including Canada. It’s one of the reasons Canadian midwives bristle at comparisons.

    In contrast to the U.S., {Canadian] midwives are university educated, highly regulated, and well-trained in emergency skills …

    Obstetricians and midwives are in broad agreement on the key measures necessary to reduce risk during home birth. They are the steps taken by Waite: ideally, a low-risk woman would deliver with the assistance of two highly trained midwives who are in close contact with an obstetrician at a nearby hospital. When those steps are put in place, Wald­man says, “it can work almost as safely as the hospital situation.”

    Is “almost” good enough when you’re talking about the survival of a newborn baby? Although he describes himself as a long-time supporter of midwives and birthing centres, the ACOG’s Waldman echoes his Canadian counterpart, Lalonde, when he says he wouldn’t want a home birth for his wife or daughter. “The intrapartum loss rate has got to be higher at home, it’s just intuitional for anybody who does this work. How big that number is could be debated.”

    And is being debated. As larger and larger studies are undertaken, Sunnybrook’s Jon Barrett believes the data will start to show consistently higher risks associated with home births …

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    ‘Illegal’ midwives: Is Australia destined for the same?

    An article from Canada explains their midwifery system which includes unregistered midwives.

    Ann (not her real name) operates outside the regulated profession, living life on the edge, exposed to a constant threat of legal action should births under her watch go wrong.

    She knows five other unregistered midwives working in Montreal’s so-called “parallel network.” They typically help women who are unable to secure legal midwife services to have their babies at home or in a birthing centre, and who reject the official alternative of giving birth in a hospital

    There is no shortage of demand for their services. With just 140 registered midwives able to practise across the entire province, the parallel network fills a yawning gap in the market. Much of the birthing industry – obstetricians, gynecologists and some registered midwives – would consider its covert practitioners to be charlatans. But, to women determined to choose how, where and with whom they give birth, they are valued allies.

    Take Teprine Baldo, who had her eldest child, now 2 years old, at home with the help of what she calls a “midwife recognized by the community. I prefer the term. It’s more respectful. People tend to talk about illegal midwives the way they used to talk about witches,” she says.

    There has been one prosecution over the years. In 2006, Diane Boutin was forced to transfer a woman in her care to … Hospital after complications set in mid-labour. Following an emergency Caesarean, the gynecologist on duty filed a complaint with the provincial order of midwives … which went on to successfully pursue Boutin for illegal practice under Quebec’s professional code, a felony carrying a fine of up to $6,000.

    In the days before the profession began its slow march toward legalization in the 1990s, all midwives were renegades operating outside the system, some entirely self-taught, others holding foreign qualifications unrecognized by the province. But, times have changed and as the now-regulated profession wages a PR battle for public acceptance, pushing against residual resistance from an often skeptical medical establishment, it cannot be seen to condone illegal practice.

    parents are likely to be the biggest losers when things go wrong, should newborns be left damaged as a direct result of negligence or malpractice.

    It’s a hugely sensitive issue. Sinclair Harris, a registered midwife at Pointe Claire birthing centre, is sympathetic with her unregistered counterparts. But, she says, “You need an understanding of pathology, of the things that can go wrong, if you are to be available for the mainstream public.”

    Women like Baldo are incredulous that they are still being denied that choice, outraged that the black market midwives helping the most determined to exercise basic rights over their bodies risk prosecution.

    “It’s like we’re being told we can’t birth properly,” she says. “I’m not against hospitals. My issue is that there’s often no alternative.”

    At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife

    Seeking closure after a traumatic first birth in hospital, Caroline Gauthier gave birth to her second child at home with an unregistered midwife.

    She was living in British Columbia, pregnant with her first child, when her dream of an intervention-free home birth went awry. Transferred to hospital by her registered midwife after her cervix was slow to dilate, she was administered hormones to speed up labour.

    “I was like Jabba the Hutt, hooked up to the monitor,” she says. Staff forgot to turn on the oxygen supply to her mask, leaving her flailing about for help. When her baby finally arrived after a traumatic final push, she was barely able to touch his foot before he was whisked away.

    Pregnant with her second child in Quebec, she immediately set about trying to secure a midwife at the Du Boisé birthing centre in the Laurentians. However, her place was contingent on her delivering at the birthing centre.

    But Gauthier had already set her heart on giving birth at home. At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife. Again, her labour was long, but she sat out the hours in the bath and in bed. “This time, I had a midwife who didn’t have a system to please,” she says.

    After three days of labour, the baby’s head popped out while she was on her way to the bath. “In less than two minutes, the whole body was out,” she says. He didn’t immediately cry, “but nobody made a circus out of it.”

    Vindicated by her second experience, she is now a fierce advocate of women’s right to give birth as they choose. “I was given the time my baby needed,” she says. “My neighbours tell me I was so brave delivering at home. My reaction is: ‘My God, you’re brave giving birth in hospital. You’re putting yourself at their mercy. You don’t know what you’re getting yourself into.’ ”

    The midwife: With no insurance, every new client is a gamble

    On D-day, Ann arrives on the scene with a case containing oxygen supplies, a heart monitor, synthetic oxytocin, herbal remedies, suture material and local anesthetic for stitches.

    She has been practising midwifery in the parallel network for more than 10 years. Clients find their way to her by word of mouth. She has a busy schedule year round, attending to three or four clients a month.

    Clients are generally women who have been unable to find a registered midwife …

    Occasionally she has transferred cases to hospital …

    With no insurance, every new client is a gamble. “My insurance is the trust I develop with the parents. I trust people who have the deep belief that it’s best for the birth of the baby. Nobody can be sure of the end result.”

    There is a contract, though she is clearly ill at ease with cold legal realities. “It’s about ensuring the parents understand what they’re getting into,” she says. “But, sometimes I forget to get people to sign. We’re on another level. It’s not about business.”

    She describes herself as a self-taught midwife eschewing a system where midwives are “too stressed, too watched.” …

    The four-year university program didn’t appeal to her. “I thought it was too focused on pathology. There was no alternative medicine. No spirituality,” she says. “It’s as if only one kind of intelligence is allowed. Forget emotional intelligence.”

    Midwifery was legalized in Quebec in 1999, following a five-year pilot project. Home births with the assistance of registered midwives have only been allowed since 2005.

    In a 2007 Statistics Canada report, 71 per cent of women who had delivered with a registered midwife rated the experience as “very positive,” compared with 53 per cent of women who had delivered in a hospital.

    According to research … midwife-assisted home births are associated with lower rates of obstetric interventions and adverse outcomes. Newborns born at home were also less likely to require resuscitation or oxygen therapy.

    Australia is heading for a similar situation, brought about by a few factors: the recent position statement on homebirth which effectively prevents midwives from attending high risk births at home, the lack of visiting rights to enable most midwives to birth in hospital with their clients, dissatisfaction with current hospital-based maternity services that are seen by women to be impersonal and highly interventionist, and a differing view of things such as risk and responsibility. Although some midwives are making the choice to unregister and continue to attend births, they do face the same issues that are explained in the article.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Smoking’s effect on unborn babies revealed

    Link

    Unborn babies exposed to nicotine have a higher risk of high blood pressure and heart disease growing up.

    … researchers now know why the nicotine exposure – including from patches and gum – has the effect:

    … the addictive substance causes the formation of potentially damaging chemicals, known as reactive oxygen species, in the blood vessel walls of the foetus.

    … nicotine patches and gum, commonly used by people trying to kick their smoking habit, could have the same effect.

    … the study proved the long-term harm nicotine caused to children from a young age or as a foetus.

    … “Both babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant and babies who are exposed to second-hand smoke after birth are more likely to die from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) than babies who are not exposed to cigarette smoke.”

    She said babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to second-hand smoke after birth also have weaker lungs than unexposed babies, which increases the risk of many health problems later in life.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    “I’ve been told my baby is big”

    and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

    An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

    In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

    Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

    The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

    The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

    It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

    I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

    A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

    My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Dutch abandon home birth

    A recent article informs us that:

    RISK OF DEATH INDUCES DUTCH WOMEN TO ABANDON HOME BIRTHS

    It goes on to say that in the last 10 years, the percentage of Dutch women who are giving birth in hospitals has risen from 37% to 75%. They state that reasons for this include:

  • concern at the disproportionally high baby death rate in home birth
  • the rising popularity of epidurals, a pain relief option in labour which is only available in hospitals.
  • The Dutch system of home births has been promoted as one which other countries should emulate, including New Zealand. However, last year a large study found that the perinatal death rate was greater in low risk women who were cared for by midwives than in higher risk women who were cared for by obstetricians. The researchers concluded that the Dutch system of risk selection is not as effective as was once thought.

    I have read the study that has been referred to above. The study concludes that:

    The main finding of this study is that the Dutch obstetric system that is based on risk selection and obstetric care at two levels may not be as effective as was once thought. The Dutch obstetric system itself possibly contributes to the high perinatal mortality compared with most European countries. We found that delivery-related perinatal death was significantly higher among low risk pregnancies in midwife supervised primary care than among high risk pregnancies in obstetrician supervised secondary care.

    The Dutch system relies on a risk assessment. Women are either in primary care or secondary care. Women who are in primary care have midwifery care and they have the option of home birth or hospital birth. The Netherlands currently has a 22% homebirth rate. Women with risk-associated pregnancies have obstetric (secondary) care and give birth in hospital. They might have issues such as high blood pressure, diabetes, twins, a previous caesarean and so on. Overall, 49.5% women remain in primary care at the start oaf labour, and 35% women remain in primary care throughout labour and birth. 65% women either start their pregnancy in secondary care or are transferred to secondary care at some stage in their pregnancy or labour. It is a system that has worked well for many years.

    However, the study has found that the intrapartum (labour and birth) death rate among term babies without congenital malformations (birth defects) was as follows:

  • For babies who started labour in primary (midwifery) care: 0.96/1000
  • For babies who started labour in secondary (obstetric) care: 0.24/1000
  • For births that took place in primary care: 0.91/1000
  • For births that took place in secondary care: 0.45/1000
  • For births that were referred from primary care to secondary care in labour: 1.09/1000
  • Babies of women who were referred from a midwife to an obstetrician during labour had a 3.66 times higher risk of delivery-related perinatal death than did infants of women who started labour supervised by an obstetrician.

    The study concludes that:

    The obstetric care system in the Netherlands may contribute to the high perinatal mortality

    and:

    the Dutch system of risk selection in relation to perinatal death at term is not as effective as was once thought.

    I suggest that there is another major issue involved that has been ignored in the above suggestion. In the Netherlands, midwives book 105 women per year. You read that correctly. While in Australia, midwives care for around 20-40 women per year, in the Netherlands it’s a huge caseload of 105 women per year. Therefore it is impossible for the midwife to personally attend every labour for the duration. Instead, there is a system in place where the women are cared for by a Kraamverzorgenden who stays with the woman during labour and for the first week after the baby is born. This person does not perform any midwifery care but provides support to the woman. The midwife pops in and out every two or four hours to examine the woman and perhaps listen to the baby’s heart beat – I say “perhaps” because there is no official guideline in The Netherlands that this ought to be attended at any specified interval. Hence the midwives check the baby’s heart beat as and when they choose. Acknowledging that the midwife does not sit with each women in labour, it’s plausible that the baby’s heart beat would only be checked every two or four hours. The standard of care for the UK and Australia is that the baby’s heart beat should be checked every 15 minutes in labour and after every contraction in the second stage of labour when the baby is being born. This is identified in the article:

    Of major concern is the fact that the highest mortality was among the infants of women who were referred from primary care to secondary care during labour because of an apparent complication. Hypothetically, this high mortality could have several causes … diagnosis in primary care can be delayed because the midwife is not always present during the first stage of labour and fetal heart beats are often checked only every two to four hours.

    I am interested in why this fundamental issue has not been addressed; rather, a complete review of a system that is in place in other countries – successfully – has been called for?

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Mum’s stress is passed to baby in the womb

    Link

    A mother’s stress can spread to her baby in the womb and may cause a lasting effect …

    … a receptor for stress hormones appears to undergo a biological change in the unborn child if the mother is highly stressed …

    And this change may leave the child less able to handle stress themselves.

    It has already been linked to mental illness and behavioural problems.

    … the women involved in the study had exceptional home circumstances and that most pregnant women would not be exposed to such levels of stress day in and day out.

    … the researchers say the findings are not conclusive – many other factors, including the child’s social environment while growing up, might be involved.

    … But they suspect it is the child’s earliest environment, the womb, that is key.

    … Some of the teens had changes to one particular gene … that helps regulate the body’s hormonal response to stress.

    Such genetic alterations typically happen while the baby is still developing in the womb.

    And the scientists believe they are triggered by the mum-to-be’s poor state of emotional wellbeing at the time of the pregnancy.

    … “It would appear that babies who get signals from their mum that they are being born into a dangerous world are faster responders. They have a lower threshold for stress and seem to be more sensitive to it.”…

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Hospital Transfers

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    There have been some articles in the press in the past few days about women being transferred from one hospital – the one they were booked to give birth in – to a different hospital. See here and here.

    Of course the women and families concerned are, well … concerned. Any time a woman’s birth plans are disrupted without notice, the situation can be stressful.

    In one situation, a woman was transferred from Campbelltown Hospital in Sydney to John Hunter Hospital in Newcastle. She was in threatened premature labour with twins. The ambulance trip took three hours. This journey happened because there were no neonatal beds available in Sydney to care for these twins.

    On the surface, this seems appalling … a woman transferred by road, for three hours, carrying twins, with the possibility of delivering them in the ambulance! However, looking beneath the surface, the detail reveals that the care provided was appropriate. According to the media reports, the woman was only 26 weeks pregnant. This is called “extreme prematurity”. In cases of premature babies, we have a task of matching their care needs to the right hospitals. We have hospitals of different levels. Some are only equipped to care for term babies, being those born after 37 weeks, while others can care for babies born after 34 weeks. And very few – only 8 across NSW and ACT- can care for babies as young as these twins were.

    Caring for babies as young as these ones requires immense resources.

    Intensive care baby

    Intensive care baby

    A specialised neonatal cot, sophisticated monitoring equipment, syringe drivers, 24/7 access to pathology and radiology, a neonatologist (this is a paediatrician who specialises in the care of newborn babies) and dedicated NICU nurses. These are specialised nurses who have completed additional graduate certificates and have extensive clinical experience. In smaller hospitals, the requirement of having these skilled and competent practitioners – as well as the purchasing and maintenance of equipment that is seldom used – would represent a significant cost inefficiency. The vast majority of babies are born at term, with a mere 0.7% babies born at – or prior to – 26 weeks.

    The Health Minister, Jillian Skinner, advised that there were more than enough beds to cater for the State – and this is true. On average. Averages work well most of the time, but sometimes we need more beds than we have available, and this is when babies are transferred to another hospital. Sometimes this is as simple as transferring from say Canterbury Hospital to the near-by Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. Other times, rarely, babies are transferred further away, and even interstate. And other times – though this never reaches the news – there are very few babies in our neonatal intensive care units …. and the full complement of staff has very few babies to care for. Neonatal beds lie idle. This is never newsworthy but according to the law of averages, it happens as often as babies are transferred to another hospital.

    Some have argued that the woman should have been able to birth her babies at Campbelltown and then move the mother and babies to another hospital. This situation is what we call an ex-utero transfer, where babies are transferred after they have been born. unfortunately this is always worse for the babies for a couple of reasons: first, the birthing hospital may not have the facilities, staff, equipment and expertise to care for the babies, and second, when the specialised team arrives to transfer the babies, this complex transfer takes hours just to set-up in the hospital because the babies need to be switched over to the helicopter equipment and stabilised before they can be moved. Having been involved in these situations, I know it can take hours and this is all time that the fragile and delicate babies are being disturbed. So for many reasons (more than I have listed here), it is far better to do an in-utero transfer – that is, transferring babies while they are still inside their mothers.

    In this woman’s case, her babies remained safe inside and were not born.

    In another case, a woman was transferred in labour from a low-risk birth unit to a unit that handled higher-risk births when it became apparent that she had risk factors associated with her labour. This was a good call. A risk was anticipated that could not be dealt with at the local hospital, and the woman was safely moved to a unit that had the resources to provide safe care to her. This is no different to a woman moving from the birth centre to the delivery suite, or from a planned homebirth to hospital at any stage of the pregnancy or birth.

    What’s important is that the care that is provided is safe, and part of providing safe care is recognising the limitations of a service and having a good back-up plan or transfer plan. NSW has a specialised network that communicates well to advise all hospitals of which ones have available NICU beds. In this way, a midwife or doctor can quickly arrange a transfer. Likewise, a smaller hospital will be buddied with a nearby larger hospital with formal transfer plans and agreed indications for transfer, so that if a woman presents with something that is higher risk than what the smaller hospital can safely care for, the smaller hospital will have a plan in place to communicate with the larger hospital and to arrange a safe transfer.

    Study links smoking during pregnancy to birth defects

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    SMOKING in pregnancy increases the risk of many congenital defects, including cleft palate and club foot, according to the first systematic review of the literature, spanning 50 years.

    … Smoking in pregnancy was associated with increased risk of cleft palate (28%), club foot (28%), craniostenosis (33%), hernia (40%) and gastroschisis (50%), with more modest increases in risk for heart and musculoskeletal defects.

    Mums-to-be urged to stress less

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Mums-to-be shouldn’t worry unnecessarily about potential risks during their pregnancy, with Perth researchers suggesting that over-inflated perceptions of risk could be causing more harm than the risks themselves.

    … overestimating risk in pregnancy can lead to higher stress levels in pregnant women which in turn can have a negative impact on the unborn child’s future physical and mental health.

    … while obstetric care in Australia has come a long way, risk in pregnancy has not been eliminated altogether and the baseline risk for birth defects is estimated at up to 5% regardless of risk exposure.

    … “Pregnant women are inundated with do’s and don’ts during pregnancy, and along with this is an expectation that a healthy baby will be assured if a woman does everything right.”

    “This can lead to a heightened sense of awareness of risks, and to a feeling of personal blame if something goes wrong. This can all result in women over-estimating the risks involved with pregnancy, particularly exposures during pregnancy.”

    There are a number of factors that may influence the development of an over-estimation of risk … The Thalidomide disaster of the early 1960s and the suffering that it caused also diminished the public trust in the safety of medication during pregnancy.

    Dr Robinson said higher stress during pregnancy can also lead to increased stress for the mother postnatally.

    “A stressful pregnancy is linked to an increased risk for postnatal depression. What we are concerned about is that the stress caused by over-estimating risks present during pregnancy may be causing more damage than the feared risks themselves,” …

    “To promote accurate and sensible risk assessment, it is important to develop a relationship of trust between the patient and the person providing obstetric care, be it an obstetrician, midwife, GP or other professional involved in the perinatal period.”

    Dr Robinson said it would also be useful to support women who are anxious or worried about risks during pregnancy through increased antenatal education, and through available psychological services within maternity hospitals and the community.

    Is ‘tribal’ obstetric culture endangering mothers and babies?

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    How we are born, who supports mothers and the quality of the care provided during birth are vital to good public health and personal well being. But all is not well in modern birthing in spite of the advances of modern medicine.

    In the United Kingdom, health policies aim to keep childbirth normal or natural and dynamic …

    In Australia, a national Review of Maternity Services (MSR) in 2009-10 generated heated public debate. It spawned critiques of the medical control of birth and the self-interest of privately practising obstetricians.

    Its outcomes remain hotly contested, particularly over women’s access midwives and home birthing.

    Much health policy now promotes strategies to improve quality and safety as being critical to good patient-centred care.

    But the Maternity Services Review overlooked some problems in the culture of obstetrics.

    … It is their philosophy and practices that have shaped the system of modern hospitalized childbirth care.

    The obstetric profession … is accountable for making sure neither practitioners nor the systems of care cause harm to women and their babies.

    … several public inquiries … showed that harm was not just being caused but was covered up.

    … painful details of serious harm done by doctors to women in maternity units, including unnecessary hysterectomies, assault, and even genital mutilation.

    … Most worrying were the common patterns of denial: stories of damage to women were mostly not reported by colleagues out of professional or “tribal” loyalty.

    Until the cases became public, they were seen just as “mistakes” or medical “misdemeanours”, or as caused by individual “bad apples” in the profession.

    Even many anaesthetists, pathologists and midwives colluded in keeping silent about women’s tragedies.

    … Individual, institutional and systemic problems are interwoven. Viewing childbirth care as a field full of power though allows us also to see how it can be reformed.

    Encouragingly, the public inquiries point to changing times: women as health care consumers used the press to agitate for these inquiries and have lobbied for wider reform.

    Midwives have also been speaking up about problems in the system.

    Some obstetricians, too, are committed to the reform of professional practice …

    But we need to go even further.

    Obstetric undergraduate and postgraduate education also needs reform. More critical reflection on the profession’s gendered and racialized power is necessary, and greater awareness of public health and social issues.

    Professional bodies … should also be expected … to develop mechanisms for critical self-examination of attitudes toward women.

    Similarly, doctors need to engage seriously with midwives’ concerns about policies pushing “inter-professional collaboration”.

    Too often, these seem to be on medical terms and experienced as continued domination rather than an equal, respectful relationship.

    High quality obstetric care remains essential for women with complex medical problems … It should be effectively supported by public funds but obstetricians are accountable for how they use them.

    … “Birth is not an illness”. Quality and safety in maternity care should not be equated with providing obstetric care.

    Women deserve real choice and autonomy in childbirth. Improving care requires more than good hospital incident-reporting systems and support for staff to report medical errors. These are valuable but not enough.

    Cultural change in maternity care institutions and health professions, and in the broader society’s views of childbirth care, is essential if we are to keep mothers and babies safe from harm.

    Mom-to-be says her hopes were destroyed by midwife

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    A … mother says things went tragically wrong when she used a midwife …

    … after her baby died, she was surprised to learn, there are different kinds of midwives …

    … Muhsin lost her daughter Alia before she even gave birth …

    … when she was 7 months pregnant, she felt like her OB/GYN office was a bit impersonal, so she did some research online …

    “I walk in this place, very serene, very organized. They have a wall full of babies’ pictures,” …

    Muhsin says the midwife who handled her care was also the director … [the midwife's] resume on her website seemed impressive.

    “She sold me a very good story, and I believed her,” said Muhsin.

    … her original obstetrician had diagnosed her with gestational diabetes. But Muhsin says [the midwife] convinced her that she didn’t really have the condition, which can jeopardize the life of a baby if it’s not properly treated.

    Muhsin and her husband got worried when she went nearly 4 weeks past her due date. Muhsin says the midwife kept reassuring her that everything was fine – but it wasn’t.

    “I just feel really sick and I told her, I don’t feel contractions anymore, nothing. She told me, it’s okay, you stay home,” …

    … “She said, okay, now you have to go to the hospital, because I don’t know what’s going on. We went in; they asked my husband, what is her due date? And they start running.”
    Hospital records indicate both mother and baby had a severe infection …

    “The baby had no heartbeat,” …

    … Direct Entry [Midwives] … are not required to have any formal training – in fact they can be self-taught.

    “They’re operating on their own without any oversight by the legislature, without any oversight … ”

    … the baby could have been saved if the midwife had transferred Muhsin’s care to a doctor before she went nearly 4 weeks past her due date.

    … “Gestational diabetes can be very risky to the baby,” …

    … “There’s a great increased risk from 39 weeks onward of in utero fetal distress, and even fetal demise,” …

    … [The midwife] denies that she waited nearly 4 weeks after Muhsin’s due date to advise her to go to the hospital. She also says that she’s still working as a midwife …

    “We want to be licensed because we want to make sure there’s a standard of care. That consumers are protected,” said Kate Mazzara.

    Kate Mazzara is a Certified Professional Midwife … she’s trying to get Lansing to pass a law to license midwives … a licensing board would then be able to hear complaints, and take action against midwives if problems arise.

    “I want to make sure that these moms and babies are birthing in a safe way, and the midwifery model of care has been shown to be an extremely safe option for families, but there should be that safety mechanism to which midwives can be held accountable,” …

    … the sad stories are rare … home births are a beautiful, natural experience … the number of home births has jumped 20% in recent years …

    Part of this article deals with the fact that in the US, there are different types of midwives, from certified nurse midwives who have degrees, work collaboratively with obstetricians, and have visiting rights, through to certified professional midwives and finally direct entry midwives. In Australia, we have registered midwives who are all accountable to the same high standard of care. As well as registered midwives, we also have eligible midwives who have satisfied an additional registration standard that entitles them to access a medicare provider number, and in the future, visiting rights. The next article deals with another aspect: that of choosing a midwife:

    How to Choose a Good Home Birth Midwife

    If you’re looking into home birth, probably the most important thing is finding a good midwife. Your midwife will be the one who cares for you, watches over you, and makes any decisions if something unexpected or difficult happens in your pregnancy. It is imperative to get a midwife who is well-trained and experienced and whom you trust and feel comfortable with.

    How do you know if you’ve found a good midwife?

    Feel free to ask anything else that makes you feel comfortable. In my experience, midwives are usually very cautious and ready to refer patients to the hospital or an OB at the first sign that something isn’t right. The should be very conscious of the limits of their training, so that if any situation crops up that they feel uncomfortable about handling, they are prepared to rule you out as a home birth candidate. This doesn’t happen too often, but it’s very important to know that if you are one of the “riskier” cases, your midwife will tell you so and refer you. Any midwife who says that she never transfers or refers women because “all women can do this!” should be avoided!

    Go with your instincts, too. If you feel comfortable with the midwife and she’s answered your questions sufficiently, then choose her. If not, keep looking …

    Choosing The Best Midwife and Why is choosing a care provider one of the most important pregnancy decisions you will make? are also helpful posts. Ultimately, registered health practitioners are responsible for practicing their profession safely. But as a consumer of a service, it is up to you to make sure that the person you have engaged for your care, is legally and professionally able to care for you (ie, registered). Don’t be afraid to check the AHPRA register of practitioners if you would like to check the registration status of your health practitioner.

    Doctors admit C-section error in tragic baby’s botched birth

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    TWO consultants have admitted to the parents of a baby deprived of oxygen at birth they should have performed a caesarean section earlier.

    Baby Senan Michael Christopher Dodd was born at Mount Carmel Hospital, Dublin, on March 28, 2008.

    There was a delay in performing the emergency birth procedure and the baby boy suffered severe brain damage due to oxygen deprivation …

    He died … on March 30, 2008.

    Two consultants obstetricians … acknowledged … the caesarean section should have been performed earlier.

    Dr Rafferty said he contributed to the delay in delivering the baby and expressed his “profound apologies” to the baby’s parents …

    [The] Midwife … told the court she called Dr Rafferty to review Roberta … due to lack of progress of labour, following an hour of active pushing.

    The doctor said he gave the parents the option of a caesarean section or of an epidural with syntocinon …

    Syntocinon and an epidural were administered.

    But the doctor failed to look back at the trace of the foetal heartbeat, which indicated a slow heart rate at 2.45pm and another slow rate after pushing began.

    … He told the inquest he should have, “been more direct and said a C-section was the way to go”.

    He agreed with counsel for the family, Bruce Antoniotti, that he did not tell the Dodds there was foetal distress because he failed to perceive it, as he failed to look back far enough on the trace.

    The baby’s heart rate was monitored intermittently …

    This is the standard of care for women in normal labour with a healthy pregnancy and baby.

    Dr Valerie Donnelly, who took over from Dr Rafferty, reviewed Mrs Dodd around 6.20pm after a prolonged period of slow foetal heart rate.

    Dr Donnelly proceeded as planned and recommenced the syntocinon although it had been turned off by the midwife, who was preparing for a C-section.

    “I regret I did not deliver the baby by C-section at that point. I believe my delay in making the decision to deliver him by caesarean section has contributed to his death,” …

    Medical Malpractice Case Nets $58 Million Verdict

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Three years after the same case resulted in a hung jury, a second Waterbury jury returned a $58 million verdict against a local gynecologist …

    Trial lawyers … convinced the jury that the doctor had breached the standard of care by not starting a caesarian section delivery in time.

    … the mother was in her 39th week of pregnancy. According to the defense, the standard of care was to not deliver a baby before 40 weeks of gestation …

    … the case was the highest medical malpractice verdict in Connecticut history.

    … “It was a complete runaway verdict, unsupported by the evidence. It’s not only uncollectable; it’s unsupportable.”

    … The couple used in vitro fertilization to have their first and only child … When the mother visited the doctor for her checkup … her level of amniotic fluid was at half the normal level. “Our expert said that is an indication there is something wrong with the baby, and it has to be delivered that day, by caesarian section,” … Delivery, however, was delayed.

    … “Our expert said that with that kind of drop in the fluid, you have to deliver this baby.”

    Two days later the mother went into labor. By the time they got her down to the operating room, the baby appeared to be stuck in breach birth …

    For the next three or four minutes, they struggled to get the baby out. When he was born, his only sign of life was a heartbeat. … They resuscitated him, but he developed cerebral palsy,” …

    The child needs extensive home care …

    Special delivery brings relief

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    PRUE Corlette travelled up to five hours a day to Liverpool Hospital from Rose Bay.

    … The twins were born nine weeks premature at Liverpool Hospital … not at The Royal Hospital for Women as she intended.

    When Ms Corlette went into early labour, there was no room in the Randwick hospital where her midwife and obstetrician were.

    Their 15 high-care cots in the neonatal intensive care unit were all occupied but there were ones available at Liverpool, Canberra and Newcastle hospitals — the closest one Liverpool, 45 kilometres away.

    “My midwife and obstetrician (from the Royal Hospital for Women) couldn’t come with me,” …

    … “I had built up a good rapport with my obstetrician … We had similar philosophies of birth.

    “When I got to Liverpool, the birth philosophy was quite different. They wouldn’t even give me a hot water bottle.”

    Theodore arrived first, then Hugo was born through an emergency caesarean section.

    “I had a succession of different doctors see me,” …

    “To be going into premature labour and to not have a consultant is terrible.

    “My second baby got into some kind of distress. I heard people screaming ‘code red’ but no one explained to me what was happening.”

    Ms Corlette was discharged after three days but the twins remained at Liverpool Hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit for another 10 days.

    Having undergone a caesarean she was not allowed to drive so she had to make the long trip from her home on public transport.

    “The staff in the neonatal unit were very helpful but the maternity ward not so good. It was very busy and overcrowded,” …

    The babies were transferred to the Royal Hospital for Women when cots became available.

    … “Liverpool Hospital has a well-staffed and resourced 12-bed Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), which is one of a number of NICUs in NSW that provide specialised care for premature and very sick babies from across the state,” …

    … neonatal intensive care beds are networked to ensure that whenever an expectant mother gives birth, she and her baby have access to the specialist care required. “This may result in the transfer from one hospital to another due to the level of care required or bed availability.”

    If I were Prue, I’d be thankful that care was available for my babies, that I did not have to be flown to Canberra (or further – say to Perth), and that we live in a country that provides such a high standard of care to mothers and babies. She did not get the care she had planned from the midwife and obstetrician that she had chosen and this was not expected, but thankfully a transfer was possible to a hospital that could provide the necessary care. Had her babies been born at RHW, they could not have received the care they needed as there were no cots available in the NICU, and presumably no staff available to care for the babies.

    For some women, a transfer will be needed. This could be because the hospital doesn’t have the facilities to care for the baby – such as a private hospital or a small public hospital – or because the larger public hospital’s NICU is full. It’s not possible to staff every unit with NICU-qualified staff 24/7 and obtain and maintain the very specialised equipment that is needed so seldom. Hence, these specialised services are provided in a few centres. In Sydney, we are proud to have 6 hospitals with NICU facilities. These hospitals provide a high standard of care to preterm babies, as measured by international standards. We are lucky to live in a country where our babies can be cared for so well.

    Calls for Strep B tests for pregnant women

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    A woman who lost her unborn baby as a result of the Strep B infection has called for routine testing to detect the presence of the bacteria.

    Group B streptococcus is a bacteria that can be passed between the mother and child during a natural birth.

    It is the most common cause of blood infections and meningitis in newborns and often causes the death of the baby.

    Gillian Boyd said her pregnancy had been perfectly normal up until her baby was stillborn at full-term.

    … “I knew … I had to deliver a baby who wasn’t going to cry.”

    … It was only after a post mortem examination that she found out her baby had died due an infection caused by Group B streptococcus.

    “… if this bacteria is detected in a pregnant woman, that it can be easily prevented,” …

    “… the UK National Screening Committee … has kept under review the evidence for screening for … (GBS) … and following the most recent review in 2009 the NSC reaffirmed its advice that screening for GBS should not be offered.

    … the efficacy of introducing a screening programme for Group B Streptococcus had not been proven.

    “… the current recommended test for GBS carriage cannot reliably identify those women who would have an affected baby,” …

    “This could result in a large number of women unnecessarily receiving intravenous antibiotics during labour, and there are potential risks associated with this.”

    … “It makes perfect sense to test, but you’re in a situation where there’s something like 75 babies a year are affected yet it would cost probably something in the region of millions of pounds to do the test.

    The issue with the current method of testing is that it takes a couple of days to get results, so the test needs to be done at the end of pregnancy. However, GBS stays for a few weeks and then goes again, meaning a woman could screen positive at 36 weeks but not have GBS at birth, or vice versa. There are risks in having unnecessary antibiotics, but there are also risks in a woman who screens negative, who subsequently develops GBS but is treated as negative (not offered antibiotics). In some studies, a considerable number of babies have died of GBS infection following their birth to a supposedly GBS negative mother. Hence the unreliability of the test. However, it is the best test that we have available at the moment. A few hospitals offer a test that can be done in labour – with test results available in 1-2 hours – providing more relevant information regarding GBS status.

    Some Fla. ob-gyns refuse obese patients

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Some South Florida obstetrics-gynecology physicians say they are refusing healthy patients who are obese or very overweight because they riskier to treat.

    A poll of 105 obstetrics-gynecology practices by the South Florida Sun Sentinel indicates 15 have some type of weight cutoff for new patients — some start at 200 pounds, some 250 pounds.

    Some of the doctors say they fear for their exam tables or other equipment, but others say they are trying to avoid higher complication rates.

    … “There’s more risk of something going wrong and more risk of getting sued. Everything is more complicated with an obese patient in [gynecology] surgeries and in [pregnancies].” …

    Obesity, elective cesarean contribute to U.S. maternal mortality rate

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    In the 14 years that I’ve worked in the world of obstetrics, I’ve witnessed three maternal deaths. All three occurred in the immediate postpartum period, all were unexpected, and all were devastating for everyone involved, but most of all for the families and children left without a mother.

    In the U.S., when a woman goes into the hospital to have a baby everyone expects that she will come home a few days later, happy and healthy, with a new baby. While this is usually the case, maternal death does still occur.

    … Women in the US are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than women in Canada, Poland, Croatia and Greece, just to name a few. And black women in the United States are four times more likely to die from pregnancy-related problems than white women.

    … it has changed little over the past 20 years. The Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation has warned that the maternal mortality rate may be increasing once again.

    … why are mothers still dying in the United States when we spend more on health care than any other country in the world?

    Some of the most common causes of maternal death in this country are hemorrhage, postpartum blood clots and underlying cardiac disease.

    The CDC cites the rise of obesity and elective cesarean rates as possible contributing factors to the problem. Hypertension, diabetes and asthma — all culprits in pregnancy-related complications — are all more common in obese women.

    Although the risks of cesarean birth are relatively minimal, studies have shown a higher mortality rate when compared to vaginal birth …

    Exercise may solve diabetes dilemma

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Pregnant women will be asked to get on their bikes as part of a major WA study.

    The Cycle Study, involving at least 200 women with a history of gestational diabetes, aims to prevent a recurrence and reduce the chances of obesity and diabetes in offspring.

    … Gestational diabetes, which is glucose intolerance that first occurs during pregnancy, affects up to 8.8 per cent of pregnant women.

    … the increased health risks for the child following a pregnancy complicated by poorly controlled gestational diabetes represented a grave future health problem in our community.

    … The risk of a pregnant woman developing gestational diabetes was higher in those overweight or obese and for those with a history of the disease in pregnancy the risk of recurrence was 55 per cent but could reach 69 per cent.

    … 35 per cent of women aged 25-35 were overweight or obese.

    Gestational diabetes placed the mother and infant at great risk of many serious health problems.

    … these included pre-eclampsia, infection and postpartum haemorrhage … The disease also had ramifications for the infant, who could grow big in the womb. The excessive growth occurred disproportionately, mainly in the shoulders rather than the head.

    The baby could also suffer from hypoglycaemia, or low blood sugar, at birth. Babies with high birth weights were at increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in later years.

    In the Cycle Study, half the women will participate in three 60-minute exercise sessions each week, starting at 14 weeks gestation, for a total of 14 weeks.

    … It is hoped the intervention will reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes by 40 per cent …

    Eat fish and reduce the risk of preterm birth

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    … fish consumption during pregnancy reduces the risk of preterm birth … The probability of preterm birth was 48.6% among women eating fish less than once a month and 35.9% among women eating fish more frequently. Interestingly, there was no further reduction in preterm birth among women who consumed more than three servings of fish per week …

    … moderate fish intake (up to three meals per week) before 22 weeks of pregnancy was associated with a reduction in repeat preterm birth …

    Mortality data delivers surprising results

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    … maternal death is rare in the developed world.

    While 600,000 such deaths occur worldwide every year, predominantly in developing countries, cases in Ireland number just a handful – and perhaps it is their rarity that makes them so shocking.

    The death last week of a woman in her late 30s, shortly after giving birth … brings the topic to the fore.

    So too did the death of 34-year-old Tania McCabe, who in March 2007 died after giving birth to twins … One of Ms McCabe’s twin boys died too.

    The HSE admitted negligence in that case and damages were recently paid to her family, but ensuring that broader lessons are learned from these and other maternal deaths is the job of a Cork-based body.

    The Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) was established in April 2009 … CMACE Ireland works closely with its long established UK counterpart and, from January 2009, all Irish maternal mortality data is included in the CMACE UK triennial report.

    … “Merging the data … enables us to accumulate enough cases of one condition from which to draw conclusions and recommendations,” …

    … “One of the greatest surprises was that sepsis has now become the greatest cause of maternal death in the UK,”

    … the virulent Group A streptococcus organism – is something that is acquired in the community, “in other words, perhaps from children at home who had sore throats”.

    … “I would think the causes ranking second and third in Britain – clotting disorders and haemorrhage – would still rank as the number one and two direct causes of death in Ireland with sepsis not as high.”

    He describes the finding as “a wake-up call for all of us in the profession . . . you think of sepsis as being more a cause of maternal death in developing countries”.

    He says the listing of haemorrhage as one of the top causes of maternal death is also noteworthy, particularly its link to Caesarean sections.

    “The more C-sections a woman has had, the more likely she is going to haemorrhage and also the more likely it is on a subsequent pregnancy that the placenta is going to embed itself over the site of the previous scar.

    … Other findings in the UK report place emphasis on the importance of caring for the mental health of the mother.

    “We know that suicide is one of the fasting growing causes of maternal death,” …

    “We ask every mother at the book-in stage about their history to help identify those who might be more at risk of developing mental health issues throughout the pregnancy or immediately afterwards,” says Ms Hughes. “We put in place referral services for them to mental health or psychiatry services.”

    … CMACE will also now record cases where a woman takes her own life in the weeks or months after birth – a step that will, for the first time, highlight the frequency of maternal deaths that occur by suicide …

    Call for thyroid screening in pregnancy

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    All pregnant women should be screened for hidden signs of thyroid disease, according to Czech researchers.

    A blood test can pick up about a third of mothers-to-be who have no symptoms but will go on to develop full-blown disease after giving birth …

    Early detection could have major implications for the health of mothers and babies …

    UK midwives say more evidence is needed of the merits of screening.

    … Most countries … recommend screening only high-risk women who have a family history of thyroid disease or have suffered thyroid problems in the past …

    Obesity in pregnancy hinders women’s ability to fight infection

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Pregnant women who are obese are less able to fight infections than lean women, which could affect their baby’s health after birth and later in life …

    … Obesity in pregnancy has been associated with an increase in infections such as chorioamnionitis …

    … obese women had fewer CD8+ (cytotoxic T) cells and natural killer cells, which help fight infection, compared to lean women. In addition, obese pregnant women’s ability to produce cells to fight infection was impaired. …

    Another reason why it is really valuable to book a preconception appointment with an obstetrician or midwife so ensure that you can be in the healthiest state possible before becoming pregnant.

    Childbirth: More Labor Interventions, Same Outcomes

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Hospitals vary considerably in the frequency with which they induce labor and perform Caesarean sections. But a new study finds that these differences do not seem to affect how newborns fare in these facilities.

    Dr. J. Christopher Glantz, a professor of obstetrics at the University of Rochester, reviewed records of almost 30,000 births … Some hospitals relied heavily on induced labor and Caesarean sections, while others performed the procedures much less often.

    Dr. Glantz measured neonatal outcomes in three ways: whether a child was moved to an intensive care hospital, whether a child needed immediate assisted ventilation and whether a child received a low Apgar score.

    He found no difference in outcomes for babies born in the hospitals with the highest rates of these procedures and those with the lowest. The result suggests that routine reliance on the procedures does little to improve outcomes …

    The recipe for safe, empowering, minimal-intervention birthing is:
    A woman who is positively motivated to have a natural birth
    Who is well-prepared for pregnancy, labour, birth and parenthood
    Who is supported by one midwife and one obstetrician right the way through her pregnancy, birth and postnatal experience
    Care providers who collaborate, communicate, respect and trust one another, who work for the best interests of the woman and her baby