Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

Maternity Services Review

Choosing the best care provider for your needs

Choosing the best practitioner for your needs is a very important and personal decision. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong choice: some women will choose a private obstetrician, others will choose a private midwife and others will choose public hospital care. Some women will make an initial choice of care provider and decide to change care providers during the pregnancy. Other women will make one choice in their first pregnancy and then a different choice in a subsequent pregnancy. What’s important is to have an accurate understanding all the options available so that you can feel confident to choose the best option for your needs. The best people to talk to are the people who actually provide the service, rather than a GP who is removed from the actual services of an obstetrician / midwife / public hospital. Get referred to a private obstetrician or two; interview them; reflect on how you feel after meeting them. Go and visit your local public hospital. Have a tour and speak with the midwives there. And interview a couple of eligible midwives. You do not need a GP referral to see an eligible midwife and you can claim their services through medicare. An eligible midwife is a private midwife who has met an additional registration standard that enables them to have a Medicare provider number.

When you are considering a care provider, it’s also necessary to consider where you would like to give birth and to ensure that your care provider can attend you in your chosen setting. You might choose to birth your baby in a public hospital as a public or private patient, in a private hospital as a private patient, in a birth centre or at home. It can be helpful when trying to make a decision to write down a list of questions you may have and also consider what is important to you as you make your choices. For example:

What do I want from my care?
What type of practitioner would I feel most comfortable with?
What do I need from my practitioner to feel comfortable and safe?
Do I want public or private care?
Is continuity of care important to me?

These are questions only you can answer. Other questions are for your care providers to answer with you, and it’s a good idea to interview a few care providers – midwives and obstetricians – before making a choice. Midwives and obstetricians will charge a fee for interviews and you are able to claim this through Medicare (your midwife will need to be eligible in order for you to claim a Medicare benefit). It is important during the interview that you ask all the questions that are on your mind, and to be aware of how you feel throughout the interview. Your care provider should inspire you with confidence, help you to feel at ease and comfortable, and the appointment should feel unhurried.

Likewise, your care provider may like to “interview” you, and this is so that your care provider can be sure that s/he can meet your needs. Maternity care is provided in a partnership and so it’s important that both parties feel really comfortable with the other.

There are many questions you might wish to ask your care provider; the best suggestion is to consider what is important to you and write a list of questions.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Medicare-funded midwifery care: What you need to know

I am an eligible midwife. This means that my private patients can claim some of the cost of private midwifery care, much the same way we do when we see a GP. As well as Medicare benefits, some private health funds will provide benefits for childbirth education with a midwife, and costs may also be claimed through tax as a medical expense (more on that one from your Accountant). Medicare benefits and tax benefits combined are between $2,500 and $3,300. This means that care with an eligible midwife will be up to $3,300 cheaper than care with a non-eligible private midwife.

What is a Medicare-Eligible Midwife?

In order to claim Medicare benefits from care with your midwife, you will need to ensure that your midwife is eligible. An eligible midwife meets certain advanced requirements of a registration standard:

  • Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
  • Midwifery experience that constitutes the equivalent of 3 years full time post initial registration as a midwife;
  • Current competence to provide pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care to women and babies;
  • Successful completion of an approved professional practice review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
  • 40 hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care (20 hours in addition to standard requirements);
  • Pregnancy care:

    45-60 minute consultations in your home or in my clinic

  • Childbirth education
  • Continuity of carer
  • Medicare benefits
  • Obstetric back-up
  • Birth in hospital – or at home

    Continue your care with the same midwife you know and trust, with specialist obstetric back-up readily available

    Postnatal care

  • Consultations in your home and / or my rooms
  • Medicare benefits
  • Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    I’m pregnant! What are my next steps?

    If you have just found out you are pregnant, congratulations! You might be feeling a range of emotions: excited, fearful, overwhelmed, happy, anxious … this is all very normal! Many women who contact me feel unsure about what to do next and are anxious to know all their options before making a choice, so I have put together a few tips to make you feel a little more confident.

    Although many women see their GP as their first port of call when they are pregnant, it’s handy to know that women may also see an eligible midwife who can order all the necessary pregnancy tests and any scans that are needed. An eligible midwife can also talk with you about the available options for your pregnancy and birth care, in a relaxed and unhurried setting. An eligible midwife can help you determine your due date and arrange any referrals that you may need. She can book you into a hospital, refer you to an obstetrician if needed, and also provide full pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    How do Midwives Work?

    It’s a common question I am asked! When people ask me what I do, I tell them I am a midwife. The next question is usually, “Oh, so you’re a nurse?”. “Not quite”, I reply, “a midwife – I care for women though pregnancy and birth and with their new baby.” Then they really look puzzled. “That’s not what an obstetrician does?” “An obstetrician is a doctor who specialises in caring for women with complicated pregnancies and births. A midwife specialises in caring for women who are having healthy pregnancies and births.” By that stage they’re well and truly confused and I start to wonder what we need to do to promote midwifery as a care option for all women.

    The term midwife means ‘with woman’. Midwives work in partnership with women through pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. Midwives can provide care to women from the time that the woman discovers she is pregnant, right up until her baby is 6 weeks old. In fact, women who experience a normal, healthy pregnancy and birth may not see a doctor at all! Eligible midwives are able to order all the necessary tests and scans during pregnancy and may refer directly to an obstetrician if their services are necessary.

    Midwives provide education, support, advice and information, as well as doing all the routine checks of mother and baby.

    Midwives advocate measures throughout pregnancy and birth that promote normal birth: that is a birth without interventions. Midwives and are experienced in such things as water birth, active birth, and so on.

    Midwives are also specially educated to know if anything is out of the ordinary, and they can get help from obstetricians. In pregnancy, midwives see women at intervals so that any issues that may present can be dealt with before they cause any major issues.

    Women who are cared for by one midwife from pregnancy through to birth have better outcomes in terms of safety, lower rates of intervention and satisfaction with their experience. Midwives too prefer to work in this way, getting to know each family individually.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Turbulent times

    A lot has been happening in the world of homebirth and midwifery. Many will have read the articles about homebirth, freebirth, midwives and maternity care that are appearing in our papers on a daily basis.

    I have not posted for a couple of weeks now, for three main reasons: one I have been really busy with my practice which has not been this busy for about two years. Second, I attended the Australian College of Midwives National Conference – the ACM worked really hard to deliver an excellent conference that was appreciated by all. I had the fantastic opportunity to meet midwives from around Australia and share ideas, discuss practice and talk birthy things. I was pleased that the conference was in Sydney, because as those of you who know me will know, in my non-midwifery life I rescue and care for injured and orphaned native birds, and so I was able to make a trip home most days of the conference to feed everyone at home. They were hungry but they all survived! I digress. The third reason for not posting was that the recent issues have made me re-assess things like responsibility, accountability, safety, choice, control, autonomy, beneficence, informed decision-making and many other issues. I have no answers to report. Just lots of reflection.

    Midwifery and maternity care are going through turbulent times and as professionals and organisations, I feel that we have done a major disservice to women that they feel safer birthing at home – with or without a registered midwife – in the presence of risk factors – because they so strongly believe that the hospital system will not enable them to birth in the manner of their choosing. It is a sad reflection on the health system and the professionals who work within it. Women who cannot access midwifery care because they are planning a VBAC. Women who are told that if they insist on birthing vaginally with twins, they must accept continuous monitoring, induction, epidural and birth in stirrups for twin two. Women whose only option is to birth in a hospital that is two hours from their home. We have all heard the stories.

    My biggest disappointment is the lack of midwife admitting rights. We are one year into the maternity reforms on November 1 this year. We have eligible midwives with Medicare provider numbers, ordering tests and working with doctors to provide safe care to women and babies – yet we cannot access hospitals to provide this care. I well understand that there are a lot of hurdles to be overcome with midwife admitting rights, and life has taught me that nothing in life is impossible.

    The release of the homebirth position statement – which I fully support as an evidence-based and safe way to provide care – combined with the lack of midwife admitting rights, is disastrous for women and midwives. Higher risk women are forced into a position of birthing in hospital without their midwife if the midwife complies with the position statement but has no admitting rights – otr else freebirthing, potentially with disastrous consequences. Overnight, this change occurred and women are fuming.

    It is impossible to believe, but an eligible midwife who crosses all the “T”s and dots all the “I”s will suffer incredibly in terms of restriction of clientele, however if she were to remove her name from the register – something that I understand is very easy to do – she may do just as she pleases with no accountability, regulation or practice standards. Midwives are placed in the untenable situation of a dwindling practice, or unregistering and having a flourishing practice. Until admitting rights are in place, midwives will have no place to birth with their higher-risk clients. This situation does not see the Government supporting midwives or women. It is creating a disaster.

    The various politics of homebirth and midwifery has created an enormous rift between midwives. It seems that there are the bunch who have elected to become eligible, forge ahead with collaborative arrangements, push for admitting rights and accept the increased regulation that is upon us as our profession matures. The other group opposes the increased regulation and restriction of choice, supports midwife- (or non-midwife)-attended homebirth for any woman who wants it and really wants things to just go back to how they used to be, before insurance became mandatory. Many midwives sit comfortable in the middle of this debate. It is sad to watch such division and animosity amongst midwives. We seem to lack a capacity of saying, “We don’t share each other’s vision and we have made different choices, but we are midwives and we will support each other”. As one midwife said to me, “We are each doing the best we can for the women we care for and we’re making the best of a rotten situation”.

    I know 2012 will be better than 2011. Who knows? Maybe it’ll be an historic year where for the very first time, women will birth on their own terms, with their chosen midwife, at home or in hospital. I wonder how many women will insist on homebirth in spite of significant risks, if they are able to birth in hospital with their own midwife and in the manner of their choosing.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Midwives still ‘on the fringes’

    A fantastic article that my colleague in WA was interviewed for. It explains the issues perfectly.

    REFORMS to the way midwives operate in WA may have been introduced last year, but unless doctors and hospitals get on board, the reforms are meaningless according to Gosnells midwife Pauline Costins.

    Mrs Costins is the first eligible private practice midwife in the State following the reforms.

    The changes made it possible for her to provide a midwife service not attached to a hospital that women could claim a Medicare rebate for.

    Hospitals and doctors play a part in births, at least for most women, especially those with high-risk pregnancies, so there is a level of interaction required between private midwives, doctors and hospitals.

    But Mrs Costins said doctors and hospitals had not been receptive to the reforms.

    … “I’ve written to 40 doctors and received one response, which was a polite ‘no’.”

    … She added many hospitals would not allow her to provide her services in their hospitals

    “I can’t take women into hospitals as a midwife, I have to drop them at the door. They don’t want me operating in their hospital.”

    Mrs Costins said Kelmscott Armadale Memorial Hospital had made her a casual employee to let her provide her services at the hospital, but that was just a temporary solution.

    She added that as well as giving a personalised service, a private midwife … offered six weeks of postnatal care in comparison to hospital midwives who provide about three days.

    A spokesperson for the Australian Medical Association WA said the association was willing to meet with midwives to discuss collaborative agreements.

    Our experiences in NSW have not been too dissimilar. I have contacted 26 obstetricians requesting a collaborative agreement; I am very fortunate that one Obstetrician has agreed and our model of care is working really well. As for admitting rights (recommended in the Maternity Services Review), NSW is yet to finalise a policy directive to enable midwife admitting rights. This is disappointing for women and midwives alike.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services

    Medicare-funded midwifery care: What you need to know

    I am a medicare-eligible midwife. This means that my private clients may claim some of the cost of private midwifery care, much the same way we do when we see a GP. As well as Medicare benefits, some private health funds will provide benefits for childbirth education with a midwife, and costs may also be claimed through tax as a medical expense (more on that one from your Accountant). Medicare benefits and tax benefits combined are between $2,500 and $3,300. This means that care with me will be up to $3,300 cheaper than care with a non-eligible private midwife.

    The bottom line: I am confident that women will be able to claim a greater portion of private midwifery fees through various means so that private midwifery care will be absolutely affordable to most families. This is all without compromising the high standard of care and service that women experience.

    What is a Medicare-Eligible Midwife?

    In order to claim Medicare benefits from care with your midwife, you will need to ensure that your midwife is Medicare Eligible. A Medicare-Eligible Midwife meets certain advanced requirements:

    * Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
    * Midwifery experience that constitutes the equivalent of 3 years full time post initial registration as a midwife;
    * Current competence to provide pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care to women and babies;
    * Successful completion of an approved professional practice review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
    * 40 hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care (20 hours in addition to standard requirements);
    * Formal undertaking to complete an accredited and approved program of study to develop midwives’ knowledge and skills in prescribing within 18 months.

    Pregnancy care:

    * 45-60 minute consultations in your home or in my clinic
    * Childbirth education
    * Continuity of carer
    * Medicare benefits
    * Obstetric back-up

    Birth in hospital

    * Continue your care with the same midwife you know and trust, with specialist obstetric back-up readily available

    Postnatal care

    * Consultations in the your home and / or my clinic
    * Medicare benefits

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant. Who should I go to for care? A Midwife or an Obstetrician?

    Private Midwife:

  • Provides autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care for women who are experiencing normal, healthy pregnancies
  • Provides care in consultation with an obstetrician when a woman’s pregnancy has risk factors (eg high blood pressure, prem labour, concern for baby’s growth, gestational diabetes etc)
  • Transfers responsibility for care to an obstetrician if complications emerge and continues to provide care within the midwifery scope of practice
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Private Obstetrician:

  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Receives referrals from midwives for women with risk-associated pregnancies or births
  • Always provides labour and birth care (including caesarean) in collaboration with a midwife
  • Obstetric care on average results in a high degree of intervention such as induction, epidural, caesarean and episiotomy
  • Provides brief in-hospital consultations after the baby is born, followed by a 6-week check
  • Pregnancy appointments are generally no more than 15 minutes in duration
  • Collaborative care: private midwife and private obstetrician

  • Receive autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care from one midwife and one obstetrician regardless of risk factors
  • No transfer of care if risk factors emerge
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Supports women to birth naturally, including with twins, a breech baby or a VBAC
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant and I have private health insurance. What are my options?

    Great question! There are a few options available to you as a private patient, as well as all of the options that are available to public patients. Specifically, the private options are either a private midwife, or a private obstetrician.

    Private midwife
    To receive care from a private midwife and obtain Medicare benefits, your midwife will need to work with an obstetrician or a doctor who provides obstetric services. Some private midwives are able to provide labour and birth care in hospital settings, while others are only able to provide labour and birth care at home. All private midwives can provide pregnancy and postnatal care. Hospital options may include private or public hospitals; it’s best to ask your midwife which hospitals she attends births at.

    Private obstetrician
    Private obstetricians can provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care, although birth care would also be provided by hospital midwives who may be unknown to you until birth. Private obstetricians deliver babies at public and private hospitals.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Hospital births continuing through our service

    Given the troubled times for midwives attending hospitals in a birth support role – either for planned hospital birth or in a homebirth transfer situation – I have had many calls from current clients and women who are exploring their birthing options, asking if hospital births are still going ahead through this service. I wanted to provide reassurance that yes, my hospital birth service is continuing! I am continuing to take bookings for hospital birth and I am able to attend hospital births in the full capacity of a midwife.

    Owing to an ongoing collaborative agreement and hospital arrangements, hospital births are continuing. Women book with me early in their pregnancy and have all of their care with me. Women also see an obstetrician twice in their pregnancy. Birthing takes place in a hospital setting complete with waterbirthing. We support VBAC, twin and breech births. It is an all-risk model too, so women don’t need to be “low risk” to benefit from continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. It also means that there is no “transfer” if a woman’s pregnancy becomes high risk: she can still receive the same wonderful care and support from her chosen midwife and obstetrician.

    Hospital staff are not routinely involved in the care of women who book through our service and we have gone to great lengths to create a birth centre feel to the birthing rooms. Rooms are quiet, warm and peaceful and we have a variety of tools available to support natural, active birthing such as floor mats, bath, shower and birth balls and of course many women also choose to bring personal items from home.

    After the baby is born, we support early discharge with many women choosing to go home four hours after the birth. Of course women may stay longer if they wish. I visit daily for the first week, twice in the second week and then weekly until discharge at 6 weeks.

    Should there be any issues along the way, we have ready access to a specialist obstetrician who is known to the woman from pregnancy.

    So the short answer is YES! I am able to continue to attend hospital births and am receiving many calls about the popular model of care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Homebirth midwifery

    In 2010, National Registration came in and required that all health practitioners carry professional indemnity insurance. Indemnity insurance had to cover every aspect of practice. Except there would be no insurance for homebirth. Threatened with the extinction of private homebirth services, the government inserted an exemption to the requirement of insurance for a homebirth. We still need insurance for pregnancy and postnatal care, but not the actual birth …. At home.

    What about when we need to transfer women to hospital? It happens in 10% – 50% of cases, depending on how a midwife practices, how adherent she is to the ACM Guidelines, safety issues and so on.

    Typically, we go with our clients to hospital and stay to support them when they are transferred. This has not been questioned until now.

    Does “support” at a homebirth transfer constitute “midwifery practice” for which we need insurance? In considering the support vs practice issue, we should consider the sorts of situations that may arise while we are supporting a woman in hospital, and how we would respond. Please consider the following scenarios:

    1. A woman transfers from home to hospital and has a CTG (baby heart rate monitor) in progress. The private midwife is in the room with the woman and her partner. There is a concerning abnormality in the baby’s heart rate. The midwife rings the bell. Several minutes elapse. The midwife rings the bell again. Should she act (change the woman’s position, cease the Syntocinon infusion if it is in progress, increase fluids etc) or not? Because if the midwife did act she’d be practicing midwifery. Let’s assume the midwife did not act. Fast forward to the birth and there is a bad outcome. Will the midwife be considered to have been partly liable for failing to act? How will the woman see this scenario if the midwife didn’t act and her baby was harmed? Do you think the woman might try to sue her midwife who she has paid to attend her birth as advocate / support / immediate second opinion person and so on?
    2. A woman has had her baby. Hospital staff have left the room and it’s quiet time for the parents. The woman mentions to her private midwife that she feels a sudden warmth and dampness and asks her midwife to check. Should the private midwife check? Should she simply press a buzzer and wait? If she does check, she notices a concerning about of vaginal bleeding. She rings the bell and waits. Should she act to stem the flow of blood by massaging the woman’s uterus to a state of contraction? If the hospital staff come and it’s obvious that they’re run off their feet, should the private midwife assist them perhaps by preparing an IV infusion, locating equipment for them to use, reassuring the woman who is the midwife’s client as well as the hospital’s client? Who’s liable if the private midwife prepares the infusion incorrectly and the hospital staff administer it? You might think the hospital staff are liable; they might argue that the private midwife is.
    3. A woman is labouring and the hospital recommends a particular course of action which the woman does not want to follow. She looks to her private midwife for guidance. What should the private midwife say? Nothing? Because if she ventures to provide any advice, she is practicing midwifery.
    4. The hospital staff make an incorrect assessment, for whatever reason. They intend to act on this incorrect assessment with a management plan that the private midwife knows to be inappropriate for the woman. Should she speak up? If she does, she is practicing; if she does not and there’s a bad outcome, could she be liable?

    So you can understand the dilemma that is faced by a midwife who “supports” her client in hospital, and why insurance is necessary whenever “the individual uses their skills and knowledge as a … midwife”. You can also understand the conflict experienced by all – the hospital, woman and midwife, when a midwife attends the hospital with her private client.

    The homebirth exemption covers the birth at home; it does not extend to a home birth transfer. One insurance product covers labour and birth care, however it only covers the care of private patients. Obstetricians don’t – as yet – provide back-up care for home birth women, and midwives do not have admitting rights to be able to admit women. Hence, women are admitted as public patients when they transfer from a homebirth.

    This has been known for a while now, that insurance does not cover the care of public patients, women who transfer from home to hospital are public, therefore the midwife is not covered. We didn’t think it mattered because we assumed that “support” requires no insurance. Right? Wrong!

    We need to have insurance to practice, but how is practice defined? The Registration Board defines it:

    Practice means any role, whether remunerated or not, in which the individual uses their skills and knowledge as a nurse or midwife. For the purposes of this registration standard, practice is not restricted to the provision of direct clinical care. It also includes working in a direct non-clinical relationship with clients, working in management, administration, education, research, advisory, regulatory or policy development roles, and any other roles that impact on safe, effective delivery

    In effect this means if you are a private midwife, you are a private midwife wherever you are and whomever you’re with. As soon as we use our knowledge or skills, we are considered to be practicing, and we cannot not use knowledge that we have.

    Where does this leave homebirth and midwifery?

    From the woman’s perspective, who would choose a private midwife for home birth care when faced with a possibility of transfer to hospital without the private midwife whose “support” / advice would be most valuable when faced with an unexpected situation?

    From the private midwife’s perspective, who can sleep at night knowing she may have to leave a woman at the hospital gate right when the woman needs her midwife the most?

    The absurd thing about all of this is that midwives can simply unregister and have none of these issues. And they are doing just that! So long as we don’t call ourselves “midwife”, we can do just as we please. You see, we have title protection (“midwife” is a protected title), but not practice protection. Anyone can assist a woman in birth. Unregistered midwives work with no practice and referral guidelines, no regulation, no compulsory hospital booking for homebirth clients, no insurance costs, no continuing professional development costs, no obstetric consultation if it is not desired – you can do what you want, so long as you don’t call yourself a midwife. It’s absolutely legal.

    Is this a safe system of care? Is this meeting the needs of homebirth women and babies? Isn’t it far better to have a system whereby a private midwife can admit her client to hospital if need be, and continue her care in the hospital?

    It seems that no-one can force hospitals to enable admitting rights for midwives, even though this is was the Health Minister’s intention when the reforms were rolled out. We have reached a situation that requires urgent resolution.

    For now, I have taken the decision to cease my homebirth practice. I am no longer accepting homebirth bookings, however I am of course homebirthing with my booked clients who have chosen homebirth.

    This has been a distressing and difficult decision. I love attending homebirths. There’s something special about being home with a woman in labour and welcoming a baby into the world gently and peacefully at home. It’s really special. Relaxed, calm, peaceful, joyous. No hospital noises or smells, no clinical store rooms, no hospital bed and stainless steel, no doors banging, phones / pagers ringing, people yelling down corridors. Just home furnishings, carpet, softness, warmth and love. The perfect way for a baby to journey into this world. My heart is very heavy with this decision. Once I have admitting rights, I will start homebirthing again. However for now, I feel incapable of dropping a woman at the hospital gate and not supporting her through labour; and I am not willing to be seen to be practicing without insurance as this is an offense.

    I am continuing to birth with women in hospital as I am fortunate to be able to do so and we have had amazing feedback from women and their partners. I truly believe it represents the ultimate in private maternity care. No-one is ever “transferred” as we can accommodate all levels of care and care needs and women are supported by continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. This is a far superior model than home birth where any obstetric involvement entails the woman being seen by an unfamiliar obstetrician in a hospital clinic and any labour transfer entails moving to a new location to be cared for by strangers. I strive to give women and babies the very best care and in my heart, I know that our collaborative model of care is the very best in private care. I am, however, very sad to leave behind homebirth for now. It has been my passion and dream for most of my life.

    ‘Illegal’ midwives: Is Australia destined for the same?

    An article from Canada explains their midwifery system which includes unregistered midwives.

    Ann (not her real name) operates outside the regulated profession, living life on the edge, exposed to a constant threat of legal action should births under her watch go wrong.

    She knows five other unregistered midwives working in Montreal’s so-called “parallel network.” They typically help women who are unable to secure legal midwife services to have their babies at home or in a birthing centre, and who reject the official alternative of giving birth in a hospital

    There is no shortage of demand for their services. With just 140 registered midwives able to practise across the entire province, the parallel network fills a yawning gap in the market. Much of the birthing industry – obstetricians, gynecologists and some registered midwives – would consider its covert practitioners to be charlatans. But, to women determined to choose how, where and with whom they give birth, they are valued allies.

    Take Teprine Baldo, who had her eldest child, now 2 years old, at home with the help of what she calls a “midwife recognized by the community. I prefer the term. It’s more respectful. People tend to talk about illegal midwives the way they used to talk about witches,” she says.

    There has been one prosecution over the years. In 2006, Diane Boutin was forced to transfer a woman in her care to … Hospital after complications set in mid-labour. Following an emergency Caesarean, the gynecologist on duty filed a complaint with the provincial order of midwives … which went on to successfully pursue Boutin for illegal practice under Quebec’s professional code, a felony carrying a fine of up to $6,000.

    In the days before the profession began its slow march toward legalization in the 1990s, all midwives were renegades operating outside the system, some entirely self-taught, others holding foreign qualifications unrecognized by the province. But, times have changed and as the now-regulated profession wages a PR battle for public acceptance, pushing against residual resistance from an often skeptical medical establishment, it cannot be seen to condone illegal practice.

    parents are likely to be the biggest losers when things go wrong, should newborns be left damaged as a direct result of negligence or malpractice.

    It’s a hugely sensitive issue. Sinclair Harris, a registered midwife at Pointe Claire birthing centre, is sympathetic with her unregistered counterparts. But, she says, “You need an understanding of pathology, of the things that can go wrong, if you are to be available for the mainstream public.”

    Women like Baldo are incredulous that they are still being denied that choice, outraged that the black market midwives helping the most determined to exercise basic rights over their bodies risk prosecution.

    “It’s like we’re being told we can’t birth properly,” she says. “I’m not against hospitals. My issue is that there’s often no alternative.”

    At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife

    Seeking closure after a traumatic first birth in hospital, Caroline Gauthier gave birth to her second child at home with an unregistered midwife.

    She was living in British Columbia, pregnant with her first child, when her dream of an intervention-free home birth went awry. Transferred to hospital by her registered midwife after her cervix was slow to dilate, she was administered hormones to speed up labour.

    “I was like Jabba the Hutt, hooked up to the monitor,” she says. Staff forgot to turn on the oxygen supply to her mask, leaving her flailing about for help. When her baby finally arrived after a traumatic final push, she was barely able to touch his foot before he was whisked away.

    Pregnant with her second child in Quebec, she immediately set about trying to secure a midwife at the Du Boisé birthing centre in the Laurentians. However, her place was contingent on her delivering at the birthing centre.

    But Gauthier had already set her heart on giving birth at home. At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife. Again, her labour was long, but she sat out the hours in the bath and in bed. “This time, I had a midwife who didn’t have a system to please,” she says.

    After three days of labour, the baby’s head popped out while she was on her way to the bath. “In less than two minutes, the whole body was out,” she says. He didn’t immediately cry, “but nobody made a circus out of it.”

    Vindicated by her second experience, she is now a fierce advocate of women’s right to give birth as they choose. “I was given the time my baby needed,” she says. “My neighbours tell me I was so brave delivering at home. My reaction is: ‘My God, you’re brave giving birth in hospital. You’re putting yourself at their mercy. You don’t know what you’re getting yourself into.’ ”

    The midwife: With no insurance, every new client is a gamble

    On D-day, Ann arrives on the scene with a case containing oxygen supplies, a heart monitor, synthetic oxytocin, herbal remedies, suture material and local anesthetic for stitches.

    She has been practising midwifery in the parallel network for more than 10 years. Clients find their way to her by word of mouth. She has a busy schedule year round, attending to three or four clients a month.

    Clients are generally women who have been unable to find a registered midwife …

    Occasionally she has transferred cases to hospital …

    With no insurance, every new client is a gamble. “My insurance is the trust I develop with the parents. I trust people who have the deep belief that it’s best for the birth of the baby. Nobody can be sure of the end result.”

    There is a contract, though she is clearly ill at ease with cold legal realities. “It’s about ensuring the parents understand what they’re getting into,” she says. “But, sometimes I forget to get people to sign. We’re on another level. It’s not about business.”

    She describes herself as a self-taught midwife eschewing a system where midwives are “too stressed, too watched.” …

    The four-year university program didn’t appeal to her. “I thought it was too focused on pathology. There was no alternative medicine. No spirituality,” she says. “It’s as if only one kind of intelligence is allowed. Forget emotional intelligence.”

    Midwifery was legalized in Quebec in 1999, following a five-year pilot project. Home births with the assistance of registered midwives have only been allowed since 2005.

    In a 2007 Statistics Canada report, 71 per cent of women who had delivered with a registered midwife rated the experience as “very positive,” compared with 53 per cent of women who had delivered in a hospital.

    According to research … midwife-assisted home births are associated with lower rates of obstetric interventions and adverse outcomes. Newborns born at home were also less likely to require resuscitation or oxygen therapy.

    Australia is heading for a similar situation, brought about by a few factors: the recent position statement on homebirth which effectively prevents midwives from attending high risk births at home, the lack of visiting rights to enable most midwives to birth in hospital with their clients, dissatisfaction with current hospital-based maternity services that are seen by women to be impersonal and highly interventionist, and a differing view of things such as risk and responsibility. Although some midwives are making the choice to unregister and continue to attend births, they do face the same issues that are explained in the article.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Homebirth Position Statement

    The Australian College of Midwives (ACM) is Australia’s professional body for midwives. Recently, ACM was charged with the task of preparing a position statement on home birth. This position statement will have a great impact on the future of home birth services in Australia, so it is of enormous significance to home birthing women and their midwives. As well as a position statement, ACM has developed a Guidance which clarifies the expectations for private midwives when providing midwifery care for a planned homebirth.

    The documents are:
    Literature Review
    Homebirth position statement
    Guidance for private midwives attending homebirths

    Probably the best way to read these documents is to start with the literature review because it provides the context for the guidance and position statement.

    ACM’s literature review was restricted to studies which met all of the following criteria:

  • Studies of planned homebirths with a registered provider/s, compared with planned hospital birth
  • Research articles that also addressed maternal and neonatal outcomes
  • Articles from developed countries, written in English and with a publication date between 1995 and 2011.
  • Any articles that did not describe studies which included a comparison group, investigate planned homebirths or relate to maternal and/or neonatal outcomes were excluded. This rigorous process identified eleven studies which formed the basis of the literature review. The review covered 352,655 homebirths from Australia and around the world.

    In general terms, the studies say that for a low-risk, healthy woman and baby, midwife-attended home birth does not increase the chance of the baby dying or being harmed. Home birth does, however, increase the chance that the woman will have a drug-free, intervention-free birth: that her labour will most likely start on its own, progress normally and lead to a normal birth with little likelihood of needing any stitches. Also, she is far more likely to breastfeed and to experience her birth as very positive and satisfying. This is important because it is well-known that interventions carry risks and that there can be a cascade effect, so that when you begin with one intervention, you often end up doing more interventions as the labour progresses (eg induction leading to long labour, leading to epidural, leading to forceps delivery). This is all minimised in the group of women and babies who birth at home with a qualified midwife who has a link in to the hospital with ready access to obstetric and paediatric care if needed.

    However, a small number of studies demonstrated that home birth increases the rate of perinatal mortality. The research suggests that the inclusion of high risk factors in home birth, increases the chance of a baby dying or being seriously harmed during birth (most commonly through low levels of oxygen). Other issues may relate to the time and distance to travel from home to hospital during labour if transfer is needed, as well as the woman’s acceptance or refusal of recommended interventions once she has transferred. It is important to note that the outcomes of women and their babies who transfer to hospital during labour will generally compare unfavourably with those not transferred due to the change in risk status of the women.

    The ACM concludes that, “It seems evident from the literature that planned home birth is a safe option for women who are at low risk of complications and who receive care from qualified attendants with adequate access to support, advice, referral and transfer mechanisms.”

    With that conclusion in mind, the ACM has developed a position statement on home birth, and following on from that, guidance for private midwives who attend home births. Much discussion has been had about these documents on various forums and email lists. Some excerpts from the position statement and guidance follow:

    It is the position of the Australian College of Midwives that home is an appropriate place of birth for women considered to be at low obstetric risk, and that women must be supported in safe, planned homebirth, by midwives and/or other appropriately qualified and regulated health professionals with adequate access to support, advice, and referral and transfer mechanisms.

    Some women may choose a planned homebirth even when this is not recommended by her care providers. In such circumstances, a midwife should, after discussions with each woman and in consultation with other health professionals, work with the woman looking for options and resolutions within midwifery professional standards to address the woman’s needs.

    Following documented discussions and appropriate consultation and referral as may be indicated, a midwife has the right to decline to continue to provide, or to accept, midwifery care if it is felt that this would require the midwife to practise outside of the midwife’s scope, skills and competencies.

    Midwives have a duty of care to each woman they provide care to, and this means that in labour, or urgent situations, a midwife must attend the woman.

    In the absence of a consistent definition of ‘low obstetric risk’, low obstetric risk is considered to be a pregnancy, labour and birth that are anticipated to be problem free.

    There are some contraindications to a planned homebirth which women should be informed of at booking. These are;
    • Multiple pregnancy
    • Abnormal presentation (including breech presentation)
    • Preterm labour prior to 37 completed weeks of pregnancy
    • Post term pregnancy of more than 42 completed weeks
    • Scarred uterus

    Issues identified as “B” or “C” in the Australian College of Midwives National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral (“the Guidelines”) would require consultation with an Obstetrician prior to proceeding with a planned homebirth. Consultation is mandatory for the midwife providing care.

    Women must be made aware of the midwife’s obligation to consult at – or prior to – booking-in.

    Ideally, midwives should meet the criteria for gaining notation as an Eligible Midwife.

    Midwives must ensure that they have documented processes in place for consultation and referral

    Any decision to provide care for a planned homebirth should take into account the possibility of transfer to a hospital and the time needed for transfer to that hospital in the event that this is deemed necessary. Women should be counselled on the possibility of transfer, and midwives should ensure that the supporting hospital is provided with a care plan/documentation around the woman’s intention for a planned homebirth.

    Midwives must utilise documented evidence-based guidelines to support antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal midwifery care.

    Midwives should undergo a formal professional peer review process at least once every three years.

    At – or prior to – booking, the midwife must advise the woman of situations where homebirth cannot be supported. At any time, the midwife is not obliged to participate in a homebirth that the midwife considers will increase the risk of harm to the woman or her baby.

    Women must be respected in the choices that they make, and that includes choices to refuse a recommended course of action at any stage of her pregnancy,

    An information pack should be made available to women that should include a ‘Terms of Care’ document outlining the terms under which midwifery care will be provided.
    Information should also include the potential for transfer to hospital for unforseen complications.
    The following information must be provided to women at the onset of their care, ideally in writing, followed up in discussion and signed by the woman:
    • Midwifery scope of practice, including the Australian College of Midwives Guidelines for Consultation and Referral;
    • Philosophy of care;
    • Choice of birth setting, including requirements for homebirth;
    • Contact information for the midwife;
    • Back-up arrangements;
    • Standards of practice and protocols, including consultation and referral
    • Responsibilities of the woman;
    • Confidentiality and access to the woman’s records (privacy agreement); and
    • Financial arrangements

    It’s fair to say that ACM’s position statement and guidance are not ideologically- or belief-driven. It’s clear that the documents are driven by evidence. ACM has tackled the conflicting issue of the woman’s negative right to autonomy versus the midwife’s responsibility to practice safely and within accepted standards of care. While much is being said on various forums, email lists and face-to-face about these documents, somehow, I can’t help but wonder if the issue is really about the restriction of home birth to low-risk women, or the fact that at this point in time, a woman and private midwife have no option but to birth at home.

    In the whole of Australia, there is currently no clinical privileging except in one small hospital. A high risk woman’s only option via this new position statement is to birth in hospital, however her private midwife would not be able to attend in the full capacity of midwife – or even as a support midwife: it has recently come to our attention that the midwife cannot legally attend in hospital at all.

    I’ll explain why: the MIGA insurance policy covers privately-admitted patients. If the woman is admitted as a public patient after being transferred from a home birth (either in pregnancy or during labour), MIGA insurance does not provide indemnity cover to the midwife in respect of the birth. Most women planning a home birth will have a back-up hospital booking as a public patient. Hence, when the midwife goes in with the woman, the midwife’s insurance does not cover her. It is against the requirements of registration to work without insurance, except at a home birth. In other words, the midwife would be attending the woman in hospital against the requirements of registration.

    In time (hopefully sooner rather than later), midwives will have admitting rights where we can admit, care for and discharge our own private patients, all funded by Medicare and indemnified by MIGA but in the meantime, this is not possible.

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Melissa Maimann & Andrew Pesce: Collaborating for success

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    ALTHOUGH only a handful of collaborative arrangements have been signed between obstetricians and midwives since national maternity reforms were introduced in November, calls for a policy rethink are premature and counterproductive.

    In fact, the reforms provide an exciting opportunity for collaborative maternity care that is safe, locally responsive and woman-centred.

    A variety of private maternity care models are possible and we are confident these will build on Australia’s strong record of safety and quality in maternity care. They will also meet the needs of women who want the familiarity and the comfort of knowing the obstetrician and midwife who will be with them through their pregnancy, birth and new parenting experience …

    Obstetricians may be concerned that the new arrangements mean they will not be directly involved in patient care until something goes wrong, while some midwives fear that the arrangements will be used to control midwifery practice, adversely impact on childbirth choices and promote anticompetitive restriction of trade.

    We believe we are the first private obstetrician-midwife team in Australia to have successfully negotiated a formal collaborative arrangement and we are very happy with how it has progressed since our first discussions.

    The first woman under our joint care gave birth in March this year and we have several others booked through to January 2012.

    We share a similar philosophical approach to maternity care and have agreed practice guidelines that we believe to be safe, evidence-based and woman-centred …

    … Women appreciate the continuity of care, and the assurance that an obstetrician they have met will be involved if medical assistance is required. Feedback from women so far has been outstanding. The main criticism has been that this model of care is not available in other hospitals.

    One of the reasons why there are currently so few collaborative arrangements has been the time taken by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency to endorse eligible midwives and by public maternity units to credential midwives in private practice.

    … Our agreed guidelines are explained to patients before they engage our services and childbirth choices are not restricted. In fact, choices are enhanced as the midwife is able to attend births in the full capacity of a midwife in hospital.

    Importantly, our model of care does not dictate “transfer” of care, merely a shift in the balance of obstetric and midwifery care because we recognise that every pregnant woman needs her own obstetrician and midwife. We support midwife care during waterbirth, vaginal birth after caesarean section, physiological birth positioning and physiological third stage.

    Change is often difficult as we all tend to be creatures of habit. This change brings with it many opportunities for obstetricians and midwives in private practice to work together in ways that are beneficial to both and, importantly, to the women in their care.

    … The maternity reforms will succeed if we remember that midwives and obstetricians are in it for the same reason — to provide safe care that meets the needs of our patients, within a respectful, professional environment.

    Dr Andrew Pesce is an obstetrician practising in Sydney and immediate past president of the AMA. Ms Melissa Maimann is a midwife in private practice based in Sydney.

    Maternity Reforms: Good news for expanded birthing options

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Maternity reforms came into effect in November 2010 which gave women access to Medicare benefits for private midwifery care for the very first time. In addition, eligible midwives were to be able to order relevant tests and ultrasounds through Medicare. Medicare benefits are available to clients of eligible midwives for pregnancy and postnatal care, however there is no benefit for birth care at home.

    So, 6-odd months on, how are things looking for maternity care and what possibilities await us?

    Well, for a start, we had around 200 private midwives in Australia. 6-odd months into the reforms and we have at least 30-40 eligible midwives. Some of those 200 midwives have ceased private practice, leaving about 100 in private practice. So 30-40 eligible midwives represents a 30%-40% update of the maternity reforms by the current private practice workforce in just 6 months. That is phenomenal. As well as this, private practice has become a more attractive option to employed midwives now that private practice is medicare-funded and indemnified. So in months and years to come, we will have more midwives in private practice, and less in the hospital employed system. This is not a concern as the hospitals would not need their own staff: women will bring their midwife with them to the hospital when they come in to birth their babies. From the hospitals’ perspective, this is excellent news: they may benefit from significant cost savings in terms of recruitment, retention, staff education, pay-roll, rostering, management and so on.

    What about for women? Well, it is well-known that women benefit from exclusive one-to-one midwifery care through pregnancy, labour, birth and the postnatal period. When women are cared for exclusively by one midwife, we know that they experience lower rates of interventions without compromising safety, and they experience higher rates of satisfaction with their birth and new parenting experience. When women choose a Eligible midwife, they can access significant medicare benefits that do reduce the cost by quite a lot. Depending on the number of pregnancy and postnatal consultations a woman has, the benefits range from say $1,000 – $2,500.

    However, in order for eligible midwives to provide medicare-rebatable services, midwifery care needs to be delivered within a collaborative arrangement. And this does open the possibility for private midwives and private obstetricians to work together in collaborative practice. The huge benefit to the woman is that she has midwifery care right the way through, from early pregnancy to 6 weeks after her baby arrives, with the reassurance of having a known obstetrician who is available is needed. Women meet the obstetrician twice in pregnancy, and the obstetrician is available for labour and birth if his care is needed, and in this way, women can benefit from the ultimate in continuity of carer. This model of care is now available for the very first time in Australia history, and we are very pleased to be able to offer it to women. So far it is a very popular option! More to come.

    More midwives needed: ACM

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Australia is around 2000 midwives short and the world needs 350,000 more midwives, according to the Australian College of Midwives (ACM).

    … Australia was home to one of the highest caesarean rates in the developed world and has limited access to continuity of midwifery care models that improve outcomes for mothers and babies.

    “We want to see mothers and babies getting the support they need through increased global and local commitment to midwifery services,” she said.

    Ms Martin said around 30 midwives have now become eligible midwives in Australia with access to the Medicare Benefits Schedule and the PBS.

    “In 2010, women and midwives welcomed in a new era in maternity reform in Australia that brings promise,” she said.

    “From November 2010, for the first time in Australian history, women have been able to choose their own midwife for pregnancy, birth in hospital and for the postnatal period, and to access Medicare rebates for care from the midwife of their choice.

    “We hope to see this model of care expand significantly in the next few years.”

    Baby born home, alone

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Before reading the article, it needs to be said that home birth is still legal. Even though it is not covered by insurance, it is legal for women to be attended by a registered midwife in private practice.

    NICHOLE Lee-Yidaki’s dream of giving birth to her baby at home came a little too late for the Northern Rivers’ small home-birth industry.

    So she decided to go it alone.

    When the Federal Government last year tightened insurance regulations around home-birth midwives, the industry warned it risked opening the way for “free-birthers” – women who chose to bear their babies at home regardless of whether they had a midwife to help them.

    The changes make it impossible for home-birth midwives to get medical indemnity insurance and effectively ban them from overseeing births at women’s homes.

    Ms Lee-Yidaki said she would have preferred to have a midwife to help welcome her son, Aquil, into the world in the kitchen of her Main Arm home two-and-a-half weeks ago, but she had no regrets about choosing “free-birthing” over a hospital birth.

    … Ms Lee-Yidaki was helped through the birth by a doula – a professional supporter – but without a midwife because it has become nigh-on impossible to get a home-birth midwife on the Northern Rivers since legal changes last year made it almost impossible for them to operate.

    … in most cases mums could only get a private midwife to look after them before and after labour, but not through the birth itself.

    … University of Technology Sydney midwifery professor Caroline Homer warned in 2009 “free-birthing” would be the “worst-case scenario” resulting from the Federal Government’s legal changes.

    Ms Lee-Yidaki’s “worst-case scenario” was being unable to give birth at home …

    Midwives are able to attend home births and home birth is legal. The issue is that insurance is unaffordable to some midwives with small practices. Doulas provide support at births that are attended by a midwife , but doulas do not provide professional care. Reputable doula organisations stipulate that a doula must not attend a home birth without the presence of a midwife.

    Freebirth is on the increase, with some reports suggesting that unattended home birth is outnumbering midwife-attended homebirth.

    Midwife collaboration ‘bound to fail’

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Forcing midwives into compulsory collaborative arrangements is “bound to fail”, with some doctors unwilling to collaborate …

    Karen Lane, a midwifery lecturer … has criticised the new … arrangements for midwives, which she says are “likely to crush an emergent collaborative culture”.

    … she says last year’s AMA-negotiated determination wrongly assumes that midwives would be unwilling to work together with doctors …

    However, she argues it is the obstetricians rather than the midwives who have showed a lack of cooperation.

    … a recent study of 15 maternity units in SA, Victoria and NSW during 2009-2010, showed that collaboration is possible without “legislative force”.

    In some cases senior midwives and obstetric staff worked together successfully.

    But one of the main problems, she says, was the lack of cooperation from obstetricians and it was their “potential destructiveness” that triggered some directors to take steps in developing collaboration arrangements.

    “The radiant success of many dedicated caseload units in achieving organic collaboration makes a mockery of the idea that midwives must be commanded to collaborate and that obstetricians are models of collaborative virtue,” …

    Collaborative arrangements are needed if women wish to claim medicare benefits for midwifery care.

    Birth of a great idea

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    LIKE most first-time mothers, Kyla Lake is eagerly awaiting the birth of her baby this month.

    Her midwife Teresa Walsh is just as excited because Kyla’s baby will be the first born in Ipswich under the new Medicare for midwives laws, part of the government’s health care reform package.

    A change in national laws on November 1 last year gave mothers the choice of a private midwife for their pregnancy and birth care in hospital and the ability to claim a Medicare rebate for the services.

    Ms Lake said having a midwife had helped quell any fears or concerns she had regarding her pregnancy and birth.

    “They give you tips and advice and talk to you regarding what will happen at hospital,” Ms Lake said. “It makes you feel more relaxed about the whole process.”

    The 24-year-old Walloon resident is due on March 20 and plans to give birth in Ipswich Hospital.

    … expectant mothers and midwives got to know each other during the pregnancy and birth, with the midwife available for advice and support for six weeks after the birth.

    … “My Midwives clients had 13 beautiful babies in February, which was more than we expected, so women really seem to like our service.

    … midwives worked in collaboration with obstetricians at the hospital and other health providers to make sure women got all the care and support they needed during pregnancy, birth and afterwards.

    Very exciting times for maternity in Australia! We are in the midst of rapid and very positive change.

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Women push for midwives under bulk bill reform

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    MIDWIVES cannot register fast enough to meet growing demand from women for services after historic changes that allowed them for the first time to bulk bill using Medicare …

    About 14 midwives have been registered … since the changes took place in November, a spokeswoman for the college, Hannah Dahlen, said.

    … women were increasingly demanding the services and her own practice was already booked out until September, she said.

    In order to qualify for Medicare, midwives needed to work with a medical practitioner such as an obstetrician, or a GP who provided obstetric care …

    … Mrs Newman had found Mahli’s birth easier than that of her daughter Isabella, which she attributed to the different style of care provided by her midwives.

    “The way they got me to birth was really different; they weren’t forcing me to push and it was much more relaxed,” …

    I have calculated that there are at least 20 eligible midwives in the country. Collaborative arrangements are a pre-requisite for women to claim Medicare benefits, so it follows that not all of those midwives will be able to provide medicare-funded care, however demand for private midwifery care is certainly increasing. Enquiries about my own private midwifery service have doubled and women are booking-in for their care at a fast pace. Private midwifery care is certainly a very popular choice and now that Medicare funding has made is so much cheaper, women, babies and families can benefit. I have negotiated several options for collaborative arrangements – including a model of care that provides for continuity of private midwifery care with a known back-up obstetrician. This model is proving to be very popular. The first baby will soon be born under this wonderful model of care … watch this space!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    MELISSA Maimann has become the first private midwife in St George to receive accreditation under the Medicare benefits schedule.

    I’m pleased to have been interviewed by The Leader: I am the first eligible private midwife in the St George area to receive a Medicare Provider Number.

    Link

    For expectant mums, the Medicare rebates equates to about $2500 off the total cost of using a private midwife.

    Ms Maimann, of St George, said she was one of only 10 private midwives in the country to receive the accreditation, which also enables providers to access some items listed on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme.

    The accreditation also legitimised private midwifery practice as an acceptable and mainstream option for giving birth, Ms Maimann said.

    “It makes it really affordable for families and a lot of research and support in private midwifery practice is providing a gold standard of care to mothers and babies,” Ms Maimann said. “I’ve always wanted to be a midwife since about five.”

    Mothers who use a private midwife have the choice of a giving birth at home, in a hospital or birth centre.

    Ms Maimann said the most common reason that mothers chose to use a private midwife was for the “continuity of care” and because women wanted to know the person that was going to be with them “for the big day”.

    “They want to have control over their care and to have more input into the decisions that are made,” Ms Maimann said.

    “We can order tests and ultrasounds as well, so women don’t need to go to their GP in order to have that done.”

    There were 295,700 registered births in Australia last year, figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed.

    The total fertility rate was 1.90 babies per woman, a small decrease from 1.96 babies per woman in 2008 and 1.92 babies per woman in 2007. Tasmania had the highest fertility rate.

    AMA boss denies bar on midwives

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    THE head of Australia’s peak doctors’ group has rejected claims obstetricians are obstructing midwives’ attempts to see their own patients, saying the first agreement permitting this has just been signed …

    Andrew Pesce, an obstetrician and president of the Australian Medical Association, said he signed the agreement with a Sydney midwife last week, and had all but sealed a deal covering a group of midwives.

    … Dr Pesce conceded some obstetricians were unhappy with the changes, but added the new system could work well with fewer specialists around the country who were willing to participate. Under the changes, introduced on November 1, eligible midwives were allowed to see patients privately under Medicare, provided specific conditions were met.

    I am proud to be that “Sydney midwife” who has an agreement with a private obstetrician to provide care to women. I believe we are the first private midwife / private obstetrician practitioners in Australia to have successfully negotiated a collaborative agreement. Our model ensures that women have care that is suited to their needs, covering everything from waterbirth to caesarean with no need for a transfer between models of care. Each woman has her care with her chosen midwife (complete with Medicare funding) and also has a known and trusted obstetrician available if her pregnancy or birth take a different path. Our model builds on Australia’s excellent record of safety in pregnancy and birth and provides continuity of care with the private midwife and obstetrician of the woman’s choice.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Doctors blocking us, say midwives

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    There are some inaccuracies in this article but the people who have been quoted were speaking from the best information they had at the time.

    Link

    Midwives have accused doctors of obstructing arrangements allowing them to practise privately, saying not one private obstetrician has signed a collaborative agreement with a suitably qualified midwife.

    Such agreements represent the easiest way for midwives to accept and treat patients for care covered by Medicare, but the Australian College of Midwives says while some obstetricians are refusing, others are demanding upfront payments in exchange for their agreement.

    In signs of continuing tensions between the professional groups, the peak standards body for obstetricians is in turn criticising the new rules as unclear and too lax, and a recently released guidance document as biased against them.

    … obstetricians were concerned that under the proposed model they would be summoned too late and expected to deal with problems not of their making.

    … Australian College of Midwives president Hannah Dahlen said none of the 10 midwives who had so far qualified to attract Medicare rebates had succeeded in signing an agreement with a private obstetrician. One specialist responded by telling the midwife he was “not in a position to form a collaborative arrangement with any independent midwives in any form”, adding, “Please don’t correspond with me any more on this particular matter.”

    “Other obstetricians [are] … putting strict requirements in terms of when they see the woman or when they get called during labour,” Ms Dahlen said. “Doctors have to get over their own self-importance in the health service . . . they are part of a team, and in a team everyone must be seen as equally important or there is no team.”

    A spokesman for Ms Roxon said meetings were planned with both obstetricians and midwives to discuss implementation of the changes.

    “We are determined to work through any issues that are raised as these new arrangements give a greater choice for patients,” the spokesman said.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Obstetricians are ready to quit

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    ALMOST a third of obstetricians are considering quitting private practice due to changes to the Medicare safety net, which slash the amount patients can claim for pregnancy services.

    … Most said they have had a drop in private bookings since the changes to the rebate and the majority said the fall had been between 10 and 40 per cent.

    … Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon moved to cap Medicare safety net payments for women who use private obstetricians after the specialists were accused of raising fees to take advantage of the scheme …

    … 49 per cent of 740 patients said they would use the public health system.

    Obstetricians are losing business but what is really happening is an incentive for women to use primary care in pregnancy: a private midwife. Private midwives who have Medicare provider numbers are required to work collaboratively with obstetricians, hence assuring that there will always be a mechanism to provide for obstetric care for women who need these high-level services. The future of private maternity care sees women accessing midwifery care for the most part, and private obstetricians when needed, on referral from the midwife.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Medicare … at last!

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Many Sydney families may now benefit from legislative changes that enable women to claim medicare benefits for private midwifery care for homebirth or hospital birth. Melissa Maimann is thrilled to be one of the first 10 midwives nationally to receive a Medicare provider number.

    A Medicare-Eligible Midwife meets certain advanced requirements in relation to experience, formal peer review, continuing professional development and competence to provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care to women and babies. This provides an assurance to the public that services provided by a medicare-eligible midwife are of a high standard. In addition, in order to use the medicare provider number, the midwife must have a collaborative arrangement with a doctor to ensure a) continuity and b) a high level of care.

    I am pleased to also let you know that I can now order all routine tests and ultrasounds. This saves women from having to have these attended by their GP. Medicare funding means that cost is no longer a barrier to women benefiting from private midwifery care. It is well known that when women are cared for by the same midwife throughout pregnancy, birth and postnatal, they are healthier, experience less intervention, are more likely to successfully breastfeed and are more satisfied with their birthing experience.

    Melissa Maimann has negotiated a collaborative agreement with a private obstetrician enabling “Ultimate Continuity”: complete continuity of private midwifery and private obstetric care for pregnancy, birth and postnatal. Alternatively, women may obtain a referral to Melissa Maimann for private midwifery care. This referral would be from a GP Obstetrician (ie, a GP with a Diploma in Obstetrics). Please contact me if you are experiencing difficulty in obtaining a referral from your GP Obstetrician.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Continuity of Midwifery Care

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    HE’S the fourth son born to Natalie … but the first child born as part of the new midwifery group practice model now offered by Manly Hospital.

    … From the moment she came under the new model, launched on October 15, Mrs Sengchanh has only had one midwife … by her side.

    … “Previously I’d go to the clinic at the hospital and see whichever midwives were on at that time,” she said.

    … The difference … between the previous births and her latest is stark.

    “I can’t remember the names of any of the midwives who helped me deliver my first three sons,” she said.

    “Sometimes a midwife would come and visit me but it would be a different one each time.

    “This was definitely my best labour.

    “I was calm the whole time because Anne was there and she knew exactly what I wanted.”

    And a lovely comment followed:

    I am so pleased to see Manly is implementing this model of midwifery care.

    Seeing the same midwife throughout your pregnancy and birth is proven to result in better outcomes for mothers and babies … That option wasn’t available when I had my two children, so we employed our own, independent midwife. For the most amazing, personal experience of my life I wanted someone who I knew and trusted to be looking after me. She was there in the hospital with us for my first child when I had to be induced – and thanks to her being there I was still able to have a waterbirth, and at home with us for our second. She was on call 24/7 …

    The difference between public continuity of midwifery and private midwifery care is that private midwifery care practically guarantees the woman a) choice of midwife and b) that the midwife that she has chosen will be the midwife to deliver all of her care. Pubic models tend to work in a team fashion whereby a woman has a named midwife (not necessarily chosen by the woman) but the named midwife works in a group with 2 or 3 other midwives. Midwives may rotate on-call work and have weekends and days off. Hence, women are not guaranteed that their named midwife will actually be with her when she births.

    The other important difference is that a private midwife usually has a much lower caseload than a public hospital midwife, and hence she is a) more available to her clients in pregnancy; b) far less likely to be attending another birth at the time that you go into labour and c) provides more extensive postnatal care, generally for 6 weeks.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Childbirth ‘over medicalised’

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    WA’s top child health researcher has stirred up the childbirth debate, claiming it is over-medicalised and saying she does not believe there is evidence that homebirth is riskier than a hospital delivery, provided it is a low-risk pregnancy.

    Telethon Institute of Child Health Research director Fiona Stanley said she was strongly supportive of the use of midwives and that too many women were having caesareans, which could lead to complications for the mother and baby.

    Professor Stanley said her own grandchildren had been delivered by midwives without medical intervention, and obstetricians needed to relinquish low-risk deliveries to midwives and trust there would be good outcomes.

    Her comments came as pregnant women cared for by experienced midwives won the right to claim Medicare rebates from this week, as part of the Federal Government’s health workforce reforms.

    “I’m strongly supportive of the increasing role that midwives are playing by preparing women for birth, by helping them plan for a spontaneous, normal delivery that will be better for mother and child,” Professor Stanley said.

    “We published a study about a few years ago which showed a dramatic increase in caesareans, and that the majority of the increase was unrelated to medical risk, so it was either obstetricians wanting to deliver that way or it was the mothers demanding it.”

    Professor Stanley said there were anecdotal claims that homebirth was dangerous but she had not seen the evidence.

    “If people say homebirth is dangerous, show us the data, because the data we have shows they’re not if the right things are in place,” she said.

    Retired Perth obstetrician Ralph Hickling, who has just published a book, Childbirth today: too many caesars, not enough joy?”, echoed the call for wider use of midwives.

    Dr Hickling said the management of childbirth had been taken over by consumerism and there was a push towards an almost 100 per cent caesarean rate.

    “In recent times Australia could claim having the highest caesarean rate in the world and I think WA could claim the highest in the country, and there’s no way the obstetric discipline can justify a caesarean rate of 35 per cent or more,” he said. “Pregnancy is being treated as a disease and childbirth is seen as an operation to cure the disease.”

    Community Midwifery WA manager Pip Brennan said that under the program women with low-risk pregnancies were reviewed by an obstetrician and monitored by midwives during their pregnancy and labour.

    “Typically women have very positive experiences,” she said … “I was in labour for quite a while but it was a wonderful experience being in my own home,” she said. “Soon after the birth I was having a cooked breakfast in bed and it was so relaxed.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Medicare extended to nurses, midwives

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    AUSTRALIA’S health system from today begins a landmark change, extending Medicare into what has traditionally been doctors’ territory by paying benefits to … midwives and their patients for the first time.

    … the changes give … midwives the potential income to operate outside the public system.

    Strictly speaking, this statement is incorrect: midwives have always had the potential income to operate outside of the hospital system; Medicare makes this more affordable however, so that more and more families will be able to benefit from private midwifery care.

    … Health Minister Nicola Roxon says the … changes are ”momentous … and a great day for patients who will be able to claim a rebate, and benefit from better access, closer to home in a wider range of settings”.

    … midwives will also be able to prescribe a specific range of medicines that will attract Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme subsidies in the same way as if prescribed by a doctor.

    … midwives will be able to provide ante-natal care, delivery and post-birth services for benefits ranging from $23.35 for a short ante-natal service up to $543.60 for a confinement and delivery.

    Ms Roxon said the changes would give patients more choice in their primary health care provider, although … midwives would be required to work in collaboration with doctors.

    Essential Birth Consulting has applied to be a Medicare-Eligible practice.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Government to deliver more maternity services in Regional Australia

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The Gillard Government has increased funding for maternity training for doctors that will see more obstetric and anaesthetic services and support for women in rural and remote areas.

    The Gillard Government has increased funding for maternity training for doctors that will see more obstetric and anaesthetic services and support for women in rural and remote areas.

    … This funding … was in response to the Government’s Maternity Services Review report that found there was a need to improve the choices available to pregnant women, including better access to high quality maternity services and more support for the maternity services workforce …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Plan ahead for collaboration

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The AMA is urging GPs to sign-up to the government’s plans for them to work in collaborative arrangements with nurses and midwives, despite risks that the move could leave doctors out-of-pocket.

    Ahead of the November start date for reforms to allow nurses and midwives to get MBS and PBS access, the AMA is calling on GPs to jump on the band-wagon.

    … Federal President Dr Andrew Pesce insists there is a “real need” for the move.

    … The AMA advises GPs to check with their indemnity provider to confirm they are covered while within the collaboration and to have a written agreement with the midwife or nurse.

    Doctors should also ensure that any collaborative arrangement does not extend beyond their current area of practice, and to be prepared for arrangements that do not work out and need to be terminated, the AMA says.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Politics of birth

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    After five hours of active labour, Kate gave birth to her second, healthy baby boy. Holding him tenderly she is oblivious to the drama unfolding … She is hemorrhaging.

    Her uterus has failed to contract after the birth causing massive blood loss … the registrar tugs at her umbilical cord in an attempt to remove her placenta. Unable to do so he proceeds manually. There is no explanation, sedation or consent as he plunges into her uterus.

    Meanwhile a midwife has been instructed to ‘wring out’ her uterus by gripping her hands deep around Kate’s stomach. Kate is screaming in pain and her partner begs them to stop. Instead he is removed from the room and their baby is taken away … What happens next is hazy for Kate as she passes in and out of consciousness. But what is clear is since that day, four years ago, Kate has been managing posttraumatic stress. Unable to go back to hospital her following two births are at home with no medical practitioners present.

    “I know it sounds reckless but … We just can’t fathom going in to the hospital because that previous experience had been so bad,” she says.

    “… I felt an unassisted homebirth was safer for me than going back to hospital to let them do the things to me that they did that time.”

    Kate is now planning her fifth pregnancy and wants an independent midwife to attend her birth at home. She has been advised to seek a collaborative agreement between her midwife and the Women’s and Children’s Hospital (WCH) as per new Federal laws governing homebirths.

    Called the National Health (Collaborative arrangements for midwives) Determination 2010, they were passed by Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon days before the election was called. They state that for an independent midwife to access Medicare and insurance they must have an obstetrician agree to care plans created for clients.

    However when Kate contacted the WCH she was told that they “do not participate in collaborative agreements”. In a statement to The Adelaide Review the hospital says: “The public-funded Homebirth strategy from the Commonwealth is part of the broader National Maternity Services Plan which is yet to be endorsed by the Health Ministers of Australia.”

    It reads like a straightforward strategy for insurance purposes, yet it has been met with confusion and anger. Firstly, insurance providers are yet to create a product that allows independent midwives indemnity while attending a homebirth.

    The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RANZCOG) does not support homebirths and believes women who choose them are putting the birth experience above that of risk. RANZCOG President Dr Edward Weaver welcomes the new legislation and hopes it will curtail the number of high-risk cases that do birth at home.

    He believes: “Virtually every obstetrician would have had an experience where he’s been called in to a situation where a woman has been brought in to hospital by an independent midwife and has had difficulties dealing with that situation.”

    In 2008 there were 115 planned homebirths or 0.5 percent of births in South Australia. While 94 of those occurred at home, 21 women transferred to hospital for care before they could birth.

    RANZCOG advocated for collaborative agreements in submissions to the Maternity Services Review, which informed the legislation. However they concede they cannot make their members adhere to them.

    And here lies the problem: a midwife needs to have a collaborative agreement to remain in practice, but there is no requirement on an obstetrician to participate in an agreement. This threatens the ability of women to access midwifery care at all, and threatens the midwife’s ability to remain in practice. At a time when there is an acute shortage of midwives, these moves only mean that there’ll be fewer midwives left to care for pregnant and birthing women and new mothers and babies.

    Australian College of Midwives Vice President Hannah Dahlen has found obstetricians will not enter into these agreements because they do not want to take responsibility for a midwives’ practice.

    It should not be a case of an obstetrician needing to take responsibility for a midwife’s practice. Midwives are autonomous and regulated practitioners. We do not require an obstetrician to be responsible for our practice any more than an ENT specialist, cardiologist or orthopedic surgeon is responsible for a GP’s practice.

    “If our most moderate and collaborative obstetricians are telling us that they are not going to be entering in to signed agreements,” she says. “Then we are potentially stymieing the reform that is going to be rolled out from November.”

    Yet one of Dahlen’s greatest concerns is that the reforms go against the World Health Organisation (WHO) definition of a midwife. The WHO states a midwife promotes a natural birth, can detect complications and is able to carry out emergency procedures if required. Hannah is concerned these new laws will end up seeing “one practice of medicine veto and regulate another”.

    Christine is an independent midwife with close to two decades of experience in the maternity sector. She has birthed hundreds of babies both within a hospital setting and independently. More than 20 women who want to birth at home have employed her until April 2011.

    “I’m happy to work alongside a doctor when it is required but I do not agree, and no midwife will agree, that it is ok for them to sanction our practice,” she claims. If this does not get resolved she is adamant homebirths will go underground with women birthing with unregistered midwives.

    … RANZCOG and the Australian Medical Association deem homebirth a high-risk proposition. Of the 202 perinatal deaths in 2008, one was in a homebirth setting. In June the State Coroner ruled to investigate the circumstances surrounding a baby who died at a homebirth in 2007. While this was widely reported in the media, the coronial inquest of an obstetrician who lost two babies to ventouse extraction at the same time was left unreported.

    “If a baby does not make it into this world, and not every baby is going to, and it is a midwife’s domain, (they) are really crucified,” says Christine. “But for doctors to lose babies and make mistakes, it is a very different thing.

    South Australian MP Frances Bedford is an advocate for a woman’s right to birth at home. She was unable to be interviewed for this article but said in a statement to The Adelaide Review: “(I) find it extraordinary that a woman choosing caesarean section without any medical need is apparently acceptable to the medical fraternity (with Australian taxpayers funding most of those costs) yet a woman choosing to maximise her chances of health and wellbeing through homebirth is discriminated against.”

    As this debate continues in the medical fraternity, Kate remains sceptical she will have the birth she wants. Instead her partner has become versed in birth advocacy.

    “We should be able to share everything we need with (a midwife) and same for the hospital,” she says. “Our partners should not have to go in there and be aggressive and advocate on our behalf.” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwives attack new ‘veto’

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    MIDWIVES are aggrieved about new rules that might curb their access to Medicare rebates and prescribing rights …

    Last year Ms Roxon announced that from November this year midwives would for the first time be able to use the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medicare rebates for their clients.

    At the time, Ms Roxon said the historic move would boost a midwife’s ability to work independently and increase options for pregnant women …

    But in a long-awaited change to the legislation … midwives will now have to work collaboratively with a doctor, who must endorse their practice before their clients can access financial benefits.

    The requirement for collaboration was always planned to be in place, but the detail of collaboration requires that a midwife has a written agreement with an obstetrician to access medicare benefits. This is problematic: more than one obstetrician must sign an agreement because no obstetrician provides 24/7 cover, so there’d need to be at least 2 obstetricians signing the agreement. What happens if one obstetrician leaves the local area? Is sick? Goes on leave? In these situations, the collaborative agreement is very vulnerable. Not only the agreement, but the midwife’s ability to provide ongoing care to her private clients.

    After eight months of debate between doctors and midwives, government records show that Ms Roxon signed a determination on the matter two weeks ago, when Parliament was out of session.

    Doctors’ groups who say home birth is unsafe are believed to have lobbied the government for the changes.

    Yesterday, midwives and home-birth advocates accused Ms Roxon of trying to hide what will be an unpopular decision with midwives and mothers.

    Australian College of Midwives president Hannah Dahlen said the change would effectively give doctors the ability to veto their access to Medicare and the PBS.

    While midwives working inside hospitals would not be disadvantaged, she said private midwives would find it difficult to find a doctor to endorse them, especially if the doctor did not support home birth.

    In fact, doctors have refused to sign agreements with any midwife who attends homebirths. Is this collaboration or control?

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Collaborative Arrangements Will Provide Better Care For Patients, Autralia

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The AMA welcomes the Government’s introduction of new regulations that require midwives … to collaborate with medical practitioners in order to provide Medicare-funded services to patients or prescribe them medications under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

    AMA President, Dr Andrew Pesce, said today that the new arrangements would provide a safer higher standard of care for patients.

    … “There is now a requirement for midwives … to establish collaborative arrangements with a medical practitioner in order for the service to attract a Medicare patient rebate or PBS benefit.

    And that’s the problem: midwives are required to establish collaborative agreements, but obstetricians do not have to collaborate with the midwife. And there are fears that if the midwife does not work according to the obstetrician’s protocols, the agreement will be revoked. this does nothing to establish midwifery as a profession in its on right.

    … “Evidence shows that patients enjoy better health outcomes when they receive coordinated, continuous, and comprehensive care that is delivered by appropriately trained health professionals,” Dr Pesce said.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Collaborative Agreements

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    The Government’s $120 million national Maternity Reform Package is currently being implemented. There is still much work to do. From 1 November 2010, women will be able to claim Medicare benefits from care that is provided by eligible midwives. Women will need to ensure that their midwife is eligible, prior to engaging her services, if she wishes to claim medicare benefits.

    It is still not known how much women will be able to claim through medicare and these details will not be known until closer to November 1, 2010.

    Midwives have been lobbying hard around the one key sticking point of these reforms: how midwives and obstetricians will work together in defined collaborative agreements. The Maternity Services Review recommended that medicare be extended to midwives who work in collaborative agreements with obstetricians, however the definition of collaboration has only just been revealed.

    The definition of a collaborative arrangement provides for four options, each requiring signed agreement from the obstetrician. No collaborative agreement = no medicare benefits for the woman.

    One option is a contract of employment whereby the midwife is employed by the obstetrician. Personally, I would have suggested that this go the other way around: considering that most women have healthy pregnancies and do not require the services of an obstetrician, the midwife ought to employ the obstetrician on a sessional basis for her private clients when obstetric services are required.

    Option two requires that the obstetrician refers a woman to a midwife for midwifery care. I truly cannot see this option working in the private health system. What incentive is there for the obstetrician to refer his/her patients to a midwife?

    Option three requires a signed collaborative agreement between the midwife and obstetrician. But there’s a catch: no obstetrician is on call for 24/7/365. Hence, at least two obstetricians will need to sign this agreement for it to be in force 24/7/365. What should happen when one partner wishes to pull out, goes on leave, has a holiday and so on? This suddenly leaves the midwife – and all of her private clients – without an agreement, without medicare and without care.

    Option four requires oodles of paperwork on the midwife’s part. I don’t mean to be negative but it would work out to be: spend one hour with the woman and one hour chasing the paperwork. Yes, there’s a *lot* of paperwork. And every time a piece of paper is forwarded to the obstetrician, the obstetrician must acknowledge receipt of this. There are at least seven points in the pregnancy where a midwife will need to photocopy and fax / post; or scan and email documents to the obstetrician and then document that the obstetrician has acknowledged receipt of these documents. A nightmare for all!!

    So where are we going with all of this and what is the big picture? The big picture as I see it, is that sometime towards the end of the year, eligible midwives will have visiting / admitting rights at hospitals. Their clients will be able to claim medicare benefits for their services for the very first time, bringing down the cost of private midwifery care significantly. Women will be able to book with their private midwife of their choice, and also be admitted to hospital for birth under the care of their chosen private midwife, presumably as a private patient. If obstetric care is needed, the midwife would have ready access to a named obstetrician who could assist the woman, enhancing continuity of care to the woman. This system would provide true continuity of midwifery and obstetric care to women.

    However, we have a long way to go. The collaborative agreements, as they stand, require an obstetrician’s sign off before the midwife can provide medicare-rebatable services to women. Some obstetricians, it seems, are very supportive of an employment model whereby the midwife is an employee of the obstetrician, however for the midwife who has her own successful and thriving business, this option will not be satisfactory. Much work needs to be done to explore models of care, facilitate visiting rights for midwives and protect the right of the midwife to practice as an autonomous practitioner, a specialist in natural birth.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Impossible midwives: private midwifery care

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    I am a midwife who wants to continue to provide private midwifery care. The systems and protection mechanisms that came into effect on July 1 are letting down midwives and women …

    The experienced midwife has watched the deteriorating standards of care in hospitals. Consumers and midwives asked the politicians and the various health authorities for change, but what have we ended up with? A confusing set of rules that reduce women’s birthing choices and rights to privacy.

    I have read the two professional indemnity insurance policies available for private midwives … I now have to scratch a plan of care that by virtue is demonstrating the “collaboration of care”, or signing over a woman’s right to privacy to a doctor or a hospital.

    As for collaboration, the definition of this term cannot be agreed by legislators, health professionals or bureaucrats. I will pay a minimum of $5000 for the four to five private clients a year. Since July 1, if I do not have profession indemnity I will not be meeting the professional standards of the new national Nurses Midwives Registration Board, and I could be disciplined, de-registered or fined.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Private and public pregnancy options

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    I am often asked what the difference is between the private and public options for pregnancy and birth.

    Both options enable women to access midwifery care or obstetric care and both options enable women to birth at home or in hospital. So you might be wondering what the difference is for the woman going through each system.

    Private care generally affords women:
    - Choice of care provider
    - Choice of place of birth – home, hospital, public or private hospitals
    - Greater comfort and a more personalised service

    Public care options often mean:
    - a midwife or obstetrician will be assigned to you; you will not be able to choose your care provider
    - Choice of place of birth is limited. Homebirth is only an option at a minority of hospitals and women generally have to go to the pubic hospital that is closest to their home
    - Services cater more to the immediate physical needs with little appreciation for the emotional and mental journey of pregnancy and birth.
    - Services are standardised by hospital policies. The same policies will apply to all women birthing at that hospital with little scope for movement.

    The good news about private midwifery services is that after November 1 this year, families will be able to claim Medicare benefits for the care that is received from a private midwife. This rebate will significantly bring down the prices for private midwifery care, making it an affordable option for women wanting to birth in hospital with a private midwife, or at home.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Homebirth is not illegal!

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    I was sad to read this article in the papers yesterday (although I love the beautiful homebirth photo that it included!)

    The article is entitled, “Homebirth Laws Confusion” and only served to increase the confusion about homebirth.

    Homebirth is not illegal. Nor will it be after July 1 this year.

    MIDWIVES attending home births in Tasmania could be liable for misconduct prosecution after July 1.

    The article stated that, “Australian Nursing Federation state secretary Neroli Ellis said the changes meant midwives who continued attending home births could be open to misconduct liability legal action.”

    The reported interviewed a well-known and experienced midwife who was quoted as saying, “The new regulations are meant to take effect from July 1 but there is nothing in place and we have no idea what we are meant to do” … She said she suspected the regulations were a backdoor way of banning home births.

    The ANF is only correct *if* the midwife practices homebirth without insurance. So long as the midwife has insurance for pregnancy and postnatal care, it is perfectly legal for midwives to continue to attend births.

    There may be some issues with insurance:
    - The policy is quite expensive, especially for midwives with low caseloads, and costs for homebrith are expected to increase
    - The insurance policy requires that the woman books into a hospital and that the midwife shares with the hospital a maternity care plan for the woman – in the interests of safety
    - The insurance policy demands that the midwife works to evidence-based guidelines and best practice.

    But … so long as these conditions are met, homebirth is, and remains, perfectly legal.

    Women having homebirths need to know that there is no insurance for the actual birth. Pregnancy and postnatal care is covered by insurance. You can expect to sign a form stating that your midwife has told you about this fact and that the have understood this.

    All births will be reported to the Health Department – already a legal requirement.

    As well as this, midwives will need to adhere to a Quality and Safety Framework. This Franework is in the hands of the Nursing and Midwifery Board at the moment and until it is placed in a code or guideline, it is not intended to be folowed. Indeed, we only have a final draft, so cannot follow it as it has not been released.

    The bottom line is: homebirth is not illegal!!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Can private midwives be fined for delivering a baby at home?

    No. it’s perfectly legal for private midwives to attend homebirths. There are no fees or penalties to the midwife or family.

    What is an eligble midwife?

    An eligible midwife is a midwife who has:

    Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
    Midwifery experience that constitutes the equivalent of 3 years full time post initial registration as a midwife;
    Current competence to provide pregnancy, labour, birth and post natal care to women and babies;
    Successful completion of an approved professional practice review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
    40 hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care (20 hours in addition to standard requirements);
    Formal undertaking to complete an accredited and approved program of study to develop midwives’ knowledge and skills in prescribing within 18 months.

    Clients of eligible midwives are able to access Medicare benefits for the services provided by eligible midwives. eligible midwives are also able to access visiting rights at a later date.

    Can you use a private midwife in public hospital in sydney?

    Yes. You can work with a private midwife during your pregnancy and she can provide all of your pregnancy care. You can labour at home as long as you like with your private midwife, moving to hospital when you feel ready. In hospital, your midwife will ensure that your needs are met and provide support and advice. After your new family member arrives, you can return home and be cared for by your private midwife.

    Sometime after November, private midwives will have visiting access to hospitals.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwifery care? An Uncertain Future.

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Houston, we have a problem.

    At July 1, 2010 eligible midwives must work in a collaborative agreement with an obstetrician. This agreement must be signed by the obstetrician. It legitimises obstetric control over women’s choices. Even basic choices such as limited (or no) vaginal examinations in labour, refusal of continuous monitoring in women who are planning a VBAC, delayed (or no) induction and so on. Of course, it also depends on how reasonable the obstetrician is.

    You see, in order for an eligible midwife to be insured for her practice, she must work collaboratively with an obstetrician and this is evidenced by a signed collaborative agreement. No signed agreement = no collaboration = insurance will not respond to any claims and therefore the midwife is working uninsured (and therefore outside the conditions of her registration) and may be de-registered.

    Once in the collaborative agreement, the midwife, woman and obstetrician must reach agreement about the plan of care if the woman’s condition is classed as a B or C in the ACM Guidelines.

    What sorts of conditions are listed as B in the Guidelines?

    Previous post-partum haemorrhage
    Hypothyroidism
    Weight over 100kg
    History of mental health disorders
    Mild asthma
    IVF pregnancy
    Previous forceps or vacuum delivery
    Having baby number 5 or more
    Previous shoulder dystocia
    VBAC
    Long labour (<1cm/hr progress)
    And the list goes on. These women must have a consultation with an obstetrician and the ongoing plan of care must be agreed by the woman, midwife and obstetrician.

    What sorts of conditions are listed as C in the Guidelines?

    Type 1 diabetes
    Coagulation disorders
    Lupus
    Twins
    Pre-eclampsia
    Breech in labour
    Gestational diabetes requiring insulin
    Prem labour
    And so on. These women cannot be cared for by a midwife; their care must be transferred to an obstetrician. The midwife’s continued involvement in the woman’s care must be agreed by the obstetrician. Even though the woman engaged the service of the midwife, has a contract of care with the midwife and has paid her midwife.

    There is no right of refusal. The midwife will consult with an obstetrician on the woman’s behalf if the woman refuses to consult in person. If the obstetrician does not agree to the plan of care – the midwife cannot continue care of the woman because the woman’s condition is considered outside the scope of the midwife’s practice (and therefore outside of insurance and registration).

    This system of collaboration is in place in other countries such as The Netherlands, NZ and Canada. The difference in those countries is the professional respect and standing of midwives that enables them to act as autonomous care providers to their women. Have you read The Birth Wars? Read it – it’s an eye opener and provides great insight into the current maternity system. Nicole Roxon wants obstetricians and midwives to work together. It seems she’s thrown us all into the bucket and simply said, “make it work!”. Unfortunately, entrenched attitudes and beliefs do not change quickly.

    Collaboration will work when:
    Collaborative agreements are negotiated at College level, not local level.
    Obstetricians are mandated to require with collaborative agreements. At present they can refuse to sign a collaborative agreement.
    Midwives have an avenue for appeal if they – or their clients – are treated unfairly.
    Visiting rights are in place.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Many midwives unaware new laws affect them

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    LEGISLATION giving midwives greater authority over the maternity care of Australian women will be launched at the end of the month, but it could take years before real changes are delivered.

    The new legislation … marks a ”major cultural shift” in the provision of maternity care, according to Patrice Hickey, Victorian president of the Australian College of Midwives.

    But, it will take up to five years for the shift from hospital-based pregnancies to a significant number managed by private midwives in superclinics to take root, she said, because most Victorian midwives did not realise the laws applied to them.

    Ms Hickey said the highly publicised controversy surrounding the role of midwives in home births had obscured the issue. She said the wide-ranging review found women wanted continuity of care during their pregnancies, with one midwife as the primary carer.

    … ”This is a major cultural shift that no one has paid attention to because a lot of people thought it was about the home-birth issue,” said Ms Hickey.

    One of the predicted major changes will mean a significant number of hospital-based midwives moving into private practise, setting up offices alongside GPs and physiotherapists in superclinics.

    … The new legislation is meant to take effect on July 1, but it is still bedevilled by a number of unresolved issues, including:
    ■ Whether access arrangements for midwives to attend births in hospitals will be governed at the state level or by the Commonwealth.
    ■ What services Medicare will cover – which means that midwives cannot yet decide what to charge their clients …
    All midwives in private practice – regardless of whether they attend labours and births in a hospital or at home – will have to meet new criteria related to an ”eligible”’ midwife status for Medicare access and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

    … The insurance will cover prenatal and postnatal care, and attending labour and births in hospitals, but not home births. The arrangements were confirmed last week …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Absurd, childish and pathetic: the latest in maternity services reform

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The 11 June issue of Australian Doctor carries a story … that is truely gob-smacking.

    … the NHMRC has been trying to organise a meeting between the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Australian College of Midwives to develop an agreement on referral guidelines in relation to midwives being able to access the Medicare Benefits Schedule … provided they work “collaboratively” with doctors.

    … RANZCOG has … refused to attend the meeting because community representatives who support homebirths have been invited.

    If you were ever in doubt about the need for reform of maternity services, then look no further.

    If you were ever in doubt about why reform in this area is so excruciatingly difficult, then look no further.

    And if you were ever in doubt that professional interests rule in the health sector, then look no further.

    This really is pathetic. Absurd and childish are other adjectives that come to mind….

    It’s simply business. Midwives and obstetricians essentially compete for the same low risk women. Every low-risk woman who sees a midwife is one less woman seeing an obstetrician. Most women are low risk. Obstetricians cannot afford to lose the bulk of their “business” to midwives and unfortunately, collaborative agreements favour obstetricians in several ways:
    - There is no onus on the obstetrician to collaborate, and for every midwife who cannot get a signed collaborative agreement, that’s one less midwife in private practice and therefore more women woo will see private obstetricians.
    - There is no onus on the obstetrician to return the woman to midwifery care once the indication for referral no longer exists. Indeed, there is a great incentive for the obstetrician to “keep” the woman: $$$.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    VBAC Women Denied Acces to Midwifery Care in Most States!

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Although this article is from America, we can expect tis to transfer to Australia in just 19 days! That’s right, in just 19 days midwives will not be able to autonomously care for women who are planning VBACs. All women requesting a VBAC will have a consultation with an obstetrician and although the woman would have booked with her private midwife for private midwifery care, her ongoing care will be determined by the obstetrician. She can expect to see the obstetrician several times in her pregnancy, homebirth will be denied to her as an option and when in hospital, the obstetrician will determine the way the woman is cared for. Any non-compliance will be met with refusal of care.

    Read on for the situation in Alaska. It’s coming to Australia in less than 3 weeks.

    One thing that has been on my mind lately, is my inability to utilize the services of a midwife. Unfortunately, because I have had two cesareans, heck, even if I had only had one, I am not allowed to use a midwife for my pregnancy and birth in the state of Alaska. I know that I can do prenatal care through a midwife who has a backup, but they cannot do my actual labor and birth. They are subject to losing their license if they do accept me as a client.

    I don’t know who is familiar with it, but if you look at the medical model of maternity care and the midwifery model, you’ll see that the outcomes of both models are drastically different, with the midwifery model being the more positive of the two.

    And Alaska isn’t the only state that does this. A lot of them do … it’s ridiculous that women attempting VBACs are being denied access to midwifery care …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Roxon’s new insurance scheme starts today: Pregnant women winners

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Link

    Privately practicing midwives and their patients get extra protection from today with Commonwealth Government-supported professional indemnity insurance now available.

    This will make a real difference to expectant mums who can now elect to see a private midwife who will have Government subsidised insurance and from 1 November, have the cost of those services covered by Medicare.

    … The Government wants to better support our expectant and new mothers and this insurance will help do that. It is a key part of the Rudd Government’s $120 million maternity reform package to provide women a greater choice in high quality, safe maternity services.

    Mothers under the high quality care of eligible midwives will now be confident that their midwife has the proper professional indemnity insurance coverage.

    The availability of this new professional indemnity insurance product also means eligible midwives will be able to meet the requirement under the new National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for all registered health practitioners to have appropriate insurance cover. This requirement comes into effect from 1 July 2010.

    This new landmark insurance product, provided by Medical Insurance Group Australia, helps to underline the importance midwives play in providing safe maternity care in Australia. It also builds on the historic legislation passed by Parliament in March that will enable the women cared for by eligible midwives to benefit from access to the Medical Benefits Schedule and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

    The Commonwealth-supported insurance will not cover services provided during homebirths. These services have a two year exemption from the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme …

    ————–
    … Midwife Tina Pettigrew from Geelong, Victoria, is one of many midwives who is excited about this new policy becoming available.

    “This is a major step forward.” Pettigrew said. “To be able to look after a woman throughout her pregnancy, follow her into the hospital to have her baby and follow her home again afterwards to help her settle into being a new mother is what I’ve always wanted to do. Now I can to do all this with full indemnity cover”

    … “On behalf of all midwives, I wish to thank the Health Minister Nicola Roxon for resolving the long running lack of professional indemnity insurance for midwives” said Associate Professor Hannah Dahlen, of the Australian College of Midwives. “The College also welcomes MIGA’s interest in providing this cover”.

    The provision of insurance cover for private midwives is one of the necessary precursors to midwives gaining access to Medicare funding for their care from 1 November this year.

    Medicare funded midwives will be able to work in practices in the community, with other midwives, with doctors and with allied health professionals as well as in hospitals to offer more women the choice of having one-to-one care from a known midwife throughout their pregnancy, labour, birth and early parenting.

    “We know that women and their babies experience measurable benefits from one-to one care from a midwife,” Professor Dahlen said. “But midwives can’t take up this historic opportunity to provide Medicare services without professional indemnity insurance, which has not been available since 2002. That’s why we’re excited about the Federal Government’s moves to make indemnity accessible again”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    framework for privately practicing midwives

    The Quality and Safety Framework is not out yet in its final version. A final draft has come out and it is now in the hands of the Nursing and Midwifery Board to accept or reject the Framework in whole or in part. I will update this blog once I know more details about the QSF.

    Midwifery in the home nsw legal

    Yes, midwifery is – and will remain – legal at home.

    Private health insurance, private midwifery care, australia

    Yes, Private Health Insurance may cover the cost of private midwifery care. Some health funds are more generous in their benefits than other funds so it’s worth doing your homework before becoming pregnant so you can get the cover that’s most advantageous.

    Private midwife vs obstetrician

    The role of the obstetrician is to provide care for women with complicated pregnancies and births, so they’re called in to manage things that are not seen to be progressing normally. The role of the midwife is to take care of healthy, well pregnant and birthing women (and their babies) and to refer to obstetricians when it’s necessary. Private midwifery care is holistic in nature, so women can expect that their midwife will be interested in getting to know them, they can expect their pregnancy consultations to be very thorough and to last for 1-2 hours. Private midwives attend the whole labour and birth, we do not just attend for the end of birth. Private midwives take on a much lower caseload – you’ll be hard-pressed to find midwives with more than 4 births a month, so we’re more available to our clients.

    Water birth experts australia

    That would be a midwife! More specifically, a private midwife or birth centre midwife. We regularly attend waterbirths.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    The Quality and Safety Framework for Homebirth

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    The long-awaited final draft of the QSF is now out for public consultation. I have copied excertps from it below. PPM refers to privately practising midwife.

    National Registration demands that all health professionals have professional indemnity insurance that covers all aspects of the care that they provide, however there is no insurance for births that take place at home in a private capacity. The QSF is in place to provide a framework so that private midwives can continue to provide homebirth services and secure an exemption to the requirement of insurance for home birth. Private midwives will still need insurance to cover pregnancy and postnatal care.

    … the Health Ministers have agreed to provide an exemption for PPMs attending a homebirth until June 2012 subject to certain conditions. No other privately practising clinicians are able to practise without insurance. This exemption only applies to intrapartum services provided in the home.

    The conditions that AHMC required are that:
    • PPMs report all homebirths according to the requirements of their jurisdiction
    • Women booking with a PPM receive written disclosure that the PPM is practising without insurance coverage for intrapartum care services in the home
    • PPMs participate in a Safety and Quality Framework for midwifery care

    … For the framework to be legally required, the NMBA (Nurses and Midwives Board of Australia) will need to, using section 39 of the National Law, develop and approve a code or guideline that contains or reflects the contents of the framework. As such the final say on the contents and mandatory use of this framework will rest with the NMBA as the professional regulating body.

    Context

    The choices made by women about their maternity care and birthing are commonly determined by:
    • previous pregnancy and birthing experiences, including … levels of intervention
    • a strong desire for continuity of carer
    • confidence that respect for their choice of care and carer will improve outcomes for themselves and their babies
    • a personal philosophy that is congruent with a preference for care to be provided outside of a clinical setting.

    The choices made by midwives in this context about the antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care which they offer are commonly determined by:
    • a preference to work as a private practitioner
    • a perception that working within a clinical setting limits their ability to work across the full scope of midwifery practice
    • a strong desire to provide continuity of care through pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period
    • a belief that the woman’s wishes can be more effectively addressed by engaging with a privately practising midwife
    • a personal philosophy that is congruent with a preference for care to be provided outside of a clinical setting.

    Midwives are qualified health professionals whose practice is governed by … the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) and … the requirements of … the Australian College of Midwives and their guidelines. Those in public systems also work within the parameters, and protection, of the clinical governance of the employing organisation … The NMBA Continuing professional development standard requires a minimum of 20 hours of professional development to be undertaken by all registered nurses and midwives each year.

    … the National Health & Medical Research Council draft “National Guidance on Collaborative Maternity Care” was disseminated. It is acknowledged that this document, together with “Primary Maternity Services in Australia – A Framework for Implementation (AHMAC 2008)” and “National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral” Australian College of Midwives 2nd Edition 2008, are consistent with the spirit and intent of the development of the Framework.

    … This framework will be provided to the NMBA with the intent that it is placed in a code or guideline. Once in a code or guideline of the NMBA, PPMs will need to adhere to it in order to meet the requirements of the exemption. The way in which the NMBA monitors the adherence to any code or guideline is a matter for them to decide …

    Safety and Quality Framework for Privately Practising Midwives attending homebirths

    To be exempt from requiring insurance for providing intrapartum care for homebirths, the privately practising midwife is expected to comply with a number of requirements. The exemption and its requirements are reflected within the National Law as reproduced below.

    … to be exempt from requiring insurance for providing intrapartum care for homebirths, the privately practising midwife will be required to abide by any safety and quality framework that the NMBA has approved and required through a code or guideline. It is intended that this framework will be provided to the NMBA to consider for such a purpose. Until it is approved by the NMBA it is not a legal requirement for PPM to use this framework in order to be exempt.

    The framework is written to ensure safe, quality care of the woman and her baby choosing to birth at home with a privately practising midwife. Women considered appropriate for inclusion in this option of care are women with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, at term and free from any significant pre existing medical or pregnancy complications. Further to this, distance and time to travel to an appropriately staffed maternity service should be considered when assessing appropriateness for this option of care.

    The framework … is not intended as a document which is exclusionary. It does, however, articulate parameters of midwifery led care as a mechanism to balance the priorities of women’s choice and quality and safety of maternity care to deliver positive outcomes for mothers and babies.

    … both the midwife and the woman need to be informed early in the pregnancy of the likelihood of needing to interact with other health professionals and the potential for transfer to other care settings. Given that access to continuity of care is a primary driver of women to choose private midwifery models, choice of appropriate models of care including clearly articulated plans of escalation and collaboration, are integral to satisfaction levels.

    … the ACM Consultation and Referral Guidelines and the principles and practices outlined in the draft NHMRC National Guidance on Collaborative Maternity Care are a key element of this Safety and Quality Framework.

    The midwife’s requirements to fulfil the QSF will increase the standard of care and provide the public with an expectation of safety, collaborative care and higher standards:

    Minimum Quality and Safety Requirements for Interim Exemption from Insurance

    In addition to holding current registration in their State or Territory, or with the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia after 1 July 2010, to comply with the exemption from the insurance requirement of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme midwives need to be able to provide evidence outlined in the table below:

    - written information detailing evidence informed materials (consumer information package)
    - Process for complaint management (Documented process, including complaint escalation information)
    - Consumer participation (Women involved in case and peer review)
    - Consumer satisfaction templates
    - Documented evidence informed clinical practice guidelines on which practice is based e.g NHMRC, NICE, or state & territory guidelines
    - Referral pathways: clearly articulated referral pathways for referral and /or consultation in accordance with ACM Consultation and Referral Guidelines
    - Comprehensive clinical notes to share with other health professionals engaged in the woman’s care
    - Reporting of all births as per each state & territory requirement
    - Clinical audit: Comprehensive clinical notes to guide reflective practice and enable review and evaluation of care provided
    - Clinical Risk: incident & adverse event reporting – documented process in accordance with state and territory requirements
    - Sentinel event reporting: documented process in accordance with state and territory requirements
    - Documented involvement in case investigation.
    - Risk profile analysis: documented process for identification and evaluation of clinical risk and evidence of correcting, eliminating or reducing these risks
    - Professional Development: maintenance of professional standards – complies with NMBA minimum standards
    - Awareness and monitoring of new procedures and practices
    - Involvement in professional organisation/s and documented schedule for formal practice review and mentoring processes
    - Competency standards – ensures appropriate skills and experience
    - Demonstrates practice in accordance with ANMC national competency standards for the Midwife
    - Continuing professional development: documented evidence of attendance at ongoing and regular education and research activities determined by the NMBA standard relating to CPD
    - Maintenance of professional portfolio

    The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA), the principal regulatory body for the midwifery profession, is the appropriate authority to hold the governance of this framework. While significant consultation has occurred, the decision to accept or use this framework in whole or in part is a matter for the NMBA to decide.

    This framework is not a legal requirement for a PPM who is exempt, until it is approved in a code or guideline by the NMBA under s39 of the National Law.

    Positives:
    - Insistence on high standards of private midwifery practice
    - Commitment to quality and safety
    - The potential for medicare-eligible midwives to offer women the option of home, birth centre or hospital birth, with all antenatal and postnatal care funded. Hospital and birth centre births will also be funded, but not homebirths. This opening up of options will improve safety by increasing options to women.
    - Midwives will be able to remain the primary carers in the ecent of hospital transfer.
    - This document reflects great respect for women’s choices to engage a private midwife for a homebirth and provides support to the midwife (in terms of a framework) and to women (in terms of safety).
    - The enormous amounts of media generated by the maternity services reforms have had a positive impact on homebirth, just by increasing awareness of homebirth as a respected and mainstream option.

    Negatives:
    - Some are disappointed that twins, breech and other risk-associated pregnancies cannot be supported in a homebirth.
    - The requirements on the midwife who wishes to attend private homebirths are fairly onerous if the midwife had previously not attended to any quality, safety, professional development and documentation issues.
    - The cost of the government insurance is prohibitive for many midwives, although it may be possible that other insurance products may be available that will only cover antenatal and postnatal care.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Professional indemnity insurance for midwives

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    “… I am pleased to announce that the Government has signed the contract to provide the first ever Commonwealth-supported professional indemnity insurance for midwives.

    The insurance will be provided by Medical Insurance Group Australia.

    Privately practising midwives will be able to purchase their own insurance, and be covered from 1 July 2010.

    This is the first time since 2002 that midwives can purchase professional indemnity insurance.

    This is an important step for Australia’s midwives. It is also an important step for Australian women and their families.

    This insurance arrangement will help midwives who wish to provide high quality midwifery services to Australian women as part of a collaborative team with doctors and other health professionals.

    It is a key part of the $120 million package of maternity reform measures the Government announced in the last Budget to improve choice and support for Australian mothers.It also helps underscore the importance of midwives in providing high-quality, safe maternity care in Australia.

    It builds on the new legislation passed by the Parliament on 16 March 2010 to give midwives access to the MBS and PBS.

    The Commonwealth-supported insurance will not cover services provided during home births.

    Medical Insurance Group Australia were selected via a tender process and has been providing insurance to doctors and other health care professionals in Australia for many years.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    changes to medicare obstetrics

    It will cost more out of pocket to have an obstetrician. Conversely, midwifery will attract medicare benefits after November, making private midwifery care more affordable to families.

    waterbirths in sydney

    The easiest way to have a waterbirth is to contract a private midwife and have a home waterbirth. Some hospitals are offering waterbirth. Sometimes it will depend on having a room available with a bath in it; other times it will depend on which midwife is on staff as some are accredited to do waterbirths and others aren’t.

    antenatal classes sydney and independent childbirth educators sydney

    The best value antenatal classes are with Julie Clarke who is an experienced childbirth educator and Calmbirth (R) Practitioner.

    can i refuse use of forceps

    You can refuse anything you don’t want to have. Often obstetricians will use a vacuum rather than forceps. Avoiding an epidural is the best way to avoid forceps or a vacuum.

    can you go public if you have phi maternity

    Absolutely! PHI is there in case you need it, but having it doesn’t mean you have to use it.

    caseload midwifery and homebirth

    Homebirth is the original caseload midwifery model! Each woman books with her own midwife, one she has sought out, trusts and knows well. That same midwife attends all the woman’s pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    cost of a private midwife sydney

    Anywhere from $3000 upwards. Most are around $3000 – $5000. It’s money well spent.

    how will homebirth be affected by the health reform australia 2010

    Truth is, we still don’t know. We’re awaiting another draft of the Quality and Safety Framework. As soon as something is released publicly, I’ll place it on this blog.

    which is safer hospital or midwife?

    It’s not really an either / or because midwives work in hospitals as well as in the community. Midwives attend every birth. In some cases, a doctor will also attend, but every birth is attended by a midwife.

    can I have a waterbirth after a caesarean?

    Of course you can!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Eligible Midwives (MBS, PBS)

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    See here and here.

    Clients of eligible midwives midwives will be able to claim Medicare benefits for private midwifery care. As well as this, the midwife will be able to order tests and ultrasounds and prescribe medications.

    Clients of eligible midwives will be able to have one-to-one midwifery care with their chosen midwife. Antenatal care may be provided in women’s homes, clinics, hospitals and so on. Birth care will be provided in hospital and postnatal care will be provided at home.

    Homebirthing women may be able to claim medicare benefits for antenatal and postnatal care, but not the birth. This will still represent a huge saving for families.

    What do midwives need to do in order to be eligible?

    My take on it is that the requirements bestowed on the midwife who wishes to become eligible will provide more safety and assurance for the public.

    A summary of the draft is as follows:

    To be entitled to endorsement as an eligible midwife, a midwife must be able to demonstrate all the following:
    a) Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
    b) Practice for at least three years across the continuum of midwifery care, within the previous 5 years;
    c) Successful completion of an approved professional review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
    d) 20 additional hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care;
    e) Compliance with the collaboration requirements for eligible midwives;
    f) Successful completion of:
    i. an accredited and approved program of study determined by the Board to develop midwives’ knowledge and skills in prescribing, or
    ii. a program that is substantially equivalent to such an approved program of study.

    So an eligible midwife must have at least three years of experience across pregnancy, birth and postnatal care. The midwife must undertake a professional review program, attend at least 40 hours of continuing professional development per year, comply with collaboration requirements (not yet available) and complete an additional postgrad course in prescribing.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    The real cost of having a baby

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    HAVING a baby is an extraordinary gift, but from the minute you see that double line spring to life on the home pregnancy test, the questions start …

    … can we afford it?

    It’s not until it reaches this point that a couple must choose whether to have the baby in the public or private hospital systems, and often cost is the deciding factor. So how much can you expect to pay to give birth to that precious bundle of joy?

    I have a big issue with any discussion of birth choices that leaves out two important options: private midwifery care and homebirth. It’s not as simple a “public or private”. Unfortunately the vast majority of Australian women are not given all of their options. I’m hopeful that this will change after November this year when private midwives will for the first time be given Medicare Provider numbers and access to the PBS for hospital birth.

    Public vs private

    … The reputations of maternity wards in public hospitals are getting better and better, and often, if there is an emergency, a private patient will be rushed to the nearest public hospital for treatment.

    But there is also a niggling perception that you are “just another patient” in the overcrowded public system. Do you want to take the risk of your case falling through the cracks or becoming a public hospital horror-story statistic?

    What an emotionally-laden and inaccurate report to state! There is far more accountability in the public health system and that is why cases that “fall through the cracks” are exposed. They are exposed, often a root cause analysis is undertaken, memos are written to staff, staff are disciplined if indicated and general improvements are made.

    Often it is the same doctors doing the rounds in both public and private hospitals, but the difference is that in the public system, who you see comes down to luck of the draw, and a complete stranger will be delivering your child.

    In many hospitals, caseload midwifery and team midwifery models are being established to increase the woman’s chance of birthing with a midwife she has met before. Of course, if women choose to birth with a private midwife, she will absolutely have a midwife she has met before.

    When you go private you can get to know your doctor, devise a solid birth plan and take comfort in knowing they’ll be there for you no matter what.

    I don’t know too many obstetricians who are wholy supportive of birth plans, unless the birth plan allows for epidurals, induction, episitomy and so on. Many obstetricians in Sydney at least will work in a team of 2, 3 or 4 obstetricians and they share the on-call on weekends and public holidays. So for approximately 114 days of the year, a woman has a 25% chance of having her doctor attend her.

    If there’s an emergency and your doctor is sick or on holidays, their office will give you an alternative contact who knows your case.

    How is this any better than having whichever obstetrician is on call in a public hospital?

    In the public system, a team of midwives will see you for appointments and the on-call doctor will perform your delivery when you go into labour.

    Ahem. Midwives “deliver” the majority of babies in this country, not doctors. We can a doctor in if we need to, but midwives re qualified to attend normal births.

    Another factor to take into account is hospital rooms. If you go private, you get your own room (providing there is one available), but in a public ward you may have to share with three other women.

    Many of the public hospital maternity wards are being or have been re-built. And most have single and doulbe rooms. No more sharing the room with 3 other mothers and babies. The newer rooms also have lovely ensuites. And the food has improved over the years!

    Privacy comes at a cost, though, and a private hospital stay can cost in excess of $7000, or more if your baby requires emergency care or you need extra medical help. The good news is that the bill gets sent straight to your health fund, which covers the full cost (you may have an excess of a few hundred dollars to pay, depending on your policy).

    Or a thousand or so dollars, depending on the co-payment or excess. Plus parking, phone, meals for partner, snacks at the cafe, anaesthetist, paediatrician …

    If you’re nervous about the prospect of the birth and want a familiar face attending you, and a private room to recover in, private is for you.

    I disagree. If you want a familiar face in labour, you’re best to use team midwifery, caseload or have a private midwife. In the private hospitals, women will not have met the labour ward midwives before arriving in labour, and they will not have met all the postnatal ward midwives.

    … Obstetricians

    If you decide to go private, a new challenge arises: picking an obstetrician. Choose someone you get along with, who calms you down and who is always available to answer your questions.

    Hmm. So bedside manner is more important than outcomes? Bedside manner is more important than intervention rates?

    Pick a hospital that’s close to home and go through their doctor lists. Look at internet pregnancy forums and ask other mums about their experiences with certain doctors …

    An initial consultation costs an average of $200. You will get $68.75 back from Medicare.

    An obstetrician’s full fee ranges from $2000 to $10,000. The higher bills include all appointments, which total up to about 15 by the time you are 40 weeks pregnant.

    If you are billed separately for each appointment, they cost a national average of $80 to $100, of which you get back $34.40 from Medicare.

    An average bill for a Sydney obstetrician is $4000 to $5000. This is much higher than the national average of $1700, according to the Australian Medical Association. As of January 1 this year, Medicare will give you a rebate of $463. Prior to January, patients got 80 per cent of the obstetrician’s bill back. So going private now costs families thousands of dollars more than it did before.

    Unless women opt for a private midwife. This option will be funded from November onwards making private midwifery a more affordable option for hospital (and home) birth.

    Ultrasounds

    If you’re going public, ultrasounds are free, but you only get two: one at 12 weeks and another at 19.

    If you’re going private, your obstetrician will send you off to ultrasound clinics for the big scans, which cost between $200 and $300 a pop. Of that, you get back roughly $50 from Medicare and none from your private health fund.

    … Baby bonus

    Once the baby arrives, you may be entitled to the baby bonus and ongoing government help to recoup some of the money you’ve spent and allow some financial reprieve while mum isn’t working.

    The sum of $5185 is now paid in 13 equal fortnightly instalments, and is payable for each child in a multiple birth. To be eligible, a family must earn less than $75,000 in the six months after the birth …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwives win more freedom

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A RECENT landmark decision by the Federal Government will provide women with greater access to midwives than ever before.

    The decision … will help to increase women’s options for their care during pregnancy and childbirth.

    Deputy head of nursing and midwifery at Griffith University’s Logan Campus, Jenny Gamble, who is also the national president of the Australian College of Midwives, has welcomed the announcement, and said it was a win for the midwifery profession and for all women.

    “These changes will give midwives more freedom to be private health providers in their own right and explore the full scope of their professional practice. As a consequence, the changes will also improve birthing options for Australian women,” she said.

    … up until now, there had been no professional indemnity insurance available to self-employed midwives, or Medicare fee rebates available to clients.

    “Their only option was to pay for the midwife themselves, and to pay for care at home or at the midwife’s rooms, but not hospital care,” she said.

    “(The new decision) means three things: eligible midwives have Medicare eligibility, improved access to the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) so they can prescribe common medications used in childbirth and they can also access professional indemnity insurance …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448