Midwives win more freedom

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Link

A RECENT landmark decision by the Federal Government will provide women with greater access to midwives than ever before.

The decision … will help to increase women’s options for their care during pregnancy and childbirth.

Deputy head of nursing and midwifery at Griffith University’s Logan Campus, Jenny Gamble, who is also the national president of the Australian College of Midwives, has welcomed the announcement, and said it was a win for the midwifery profession and for all women.

“These changes will give midwives more freedom to be private health providers in their own right and explore the full scope of their professional practice. As a consequence, the changes will also improve birthing options for Australian women,” she said.

… up until now, there had been no professional indemnity insurance available to self-employed midwives, or Medicare fee rebates available to clients.

“Their only option was to pay for the midwife themselves, and to pay for care at home or at the midwife’s rooms, but not hospital care,” she said.

“(The new decision) means three things: eligible midwives have Medicare eligibility, improved access to the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) so they can prescribe common medications used in childbirth and they can also access professional indemnity insurance …

Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

FAQs

Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

Birth trauma symptoms

The symptoms of birth trauma are many and varied. A common theme is that the trauma interferes with your enjoyment of daily life. The trauma issues may surface at different times, and then completely disappear.

Some women experience:

  • Flashbacks of the event and sudden, vivid memories. You will usually feel distressed, anxious or panicky when you’re exposed to things that remind you of the event
    Avoidance of anything that reminds you of the event. Some women never talk about their births or avoid hospitals. In contrast, other women talk about their birth trauma all the time; this is their way of expressing their extreme hurt, anger and fear.
    You may also experience emotions such as anger, irritability, and hyper-vigilance (feeling jumpy or on-guard all the time)
    Nightmares of the birth
    Physiological responses when you are exposed to events resembling the traumatic event, such as panic attacks, sweating and palpitations
    Numbed emotions
  • benefits of birthing by midwives over doctors

    The msin benefits of using a midwife are:

    Higher chance of natural birth
    Continuity of care: you have the same midwife for pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care. Even with a private obstetrician, you’ll be attended by midwives you have not met when you’re in labour and afterwards when you stay in the ward with your new baby. If you choose midwifery care, especially private midwifery care (no private health insurance needed), you have the same person looking after you the whole way through.

    do you need informed consent episiotomy

    Most definitely! The only time consent is not needed is in a genuine emergency. Since women are generally awake for their births, there is no reason why your midwife or doctor would not seek your permission before doing an episiotomy, even in an emergency situation. Remeber – you can always say no to an episiotomy.

    duty of care to an unborn child

    Midwives and obstetricians do owe a duty of care to the baby. Babies do nto have any rights until they are born alive and take their first breath. Once they do that, they are afforded the full rights of a person.

    no obstetrician for birth in private hospital

    Currently, it is not possible to birth in a private hospital without an obstetrician. However, you can have a private midwife and a private obstetrician at aprivate hospital.

    private birthing classes at home, Sydney

    Yes, this is possible. See here.

    will homebirth be legal after July, 2010?

    Absolutely! Homebirth has always been, and will always be, legal. The ability for midwives to practice in women’s homes is dependent on the midwife reporting every homebirth, letting women know that we are not insured for births at home, and also agreeing to abide by a quality and safety framework. This is all designed to give the public greater confidence in private midwifery services and to increase safety for women and babies.

    Birth providers who support vbac in sydney

    The best way of achieving a VBAC in Sydney is to contract a private midwife to provide your care. Private midwives have roughly a 90% VBA success rate.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Landmark Health Reform Law To Improve Access To Midwifery, Benefit Women’s Health

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) is pleased to announce that certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) have achieved equitable reimbursement for their services under Medicare. As of January 1, 2011, the CNM reimbursement rate will increase from 65% to 100% of the Medicare Part B fee schedule. This long-awaited provision is part of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law today by President Barack Obama.

    “Inadequate reimbursement for midwifery services has been a significant barrier to women’s access to the valuable services of CNMs and certified midwives (CMs),” … “This legislation not only improves Medicare for women, but will encourage Medicaid plans and third-party payers to adopt equitable reimbursement policies for midwifery services.”

    CNMs and CMs provide health care services to women of all ages and stand to play a vital role in increasing access to quality, affordable primary care, gynecology, family planning, and maternity care services. Equitable reimbursement will enhance the viability of midwifery practices as well as increase the incentive for hospital and physician practices to employ CNMs and CMs. In addition, CNM- and CM-attended births-which occur primarily in hospitals, but also in birth centers and private residences-are associated with high-quality outcomes and fewer cesarean sections … cesarean section has been identified as an overused maternity care intervention by the National Priorities Partnership, an influential multi-stakeholder coalition working to identify top priorities for improving the quality and affordability of health care in the US.

    … the bill recognizes freestanding birth centers under Medicaid, improves access to women’s preventive health services, ensures direct access to the obstetrician/gynecologist or CNM/CM of their choice … and begins the effort to reduce the rate of increase for medical malpractice insurance through state-focused initiatives …

    Sounds similar to what will be occurring here. After November 2010, women who seek the services of a private midwife for a planned hospital birth, will be able to have her care entirely (or mostly) funded by Medicare.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Laws distress home birth advocate

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    KELLY Roche is one mum ‘devastated’ by the ramifications of the Federal Government’s new midwife laws.

    Mrs Roche … gave birth to her son Dylan at home two years ago under the supervision of a registered midwife.

    “It was very important to me to have the continuity of care that a private midwife provides, from when conception has occurred, right throughout the pregnancy, the birth and beyond,” she said.

    “You’ve got a relationship with your midwife that you would never find in the public or private health system,” she said.

    But now, Mrs Roche said, women’s choices would be limited by legislation.

    “People are faced with a choice: to have their baby in a hospital, or to use midwives who are unprotected and unregistered.

    “It really is devastating. It means there’s less opportunity for people like me to make choices about how to deliver their own babies.”

    Mrs Roche said the first birth she ever attended was that of a friend who home-birthed.

    “Her experience was wonderful,” she said.

    She said other friends had ‘diverse’ birth experiences at hospitals.

    Mrs Roche said the negative experiences were usually the result of ‘highly medicalised births’.

    With this in mind, Mrs Roche felt she would have ‘more control’ giving birth at home.

    “I felt my choices would be respected, but I also knew that if I needed medical help, it was readily available.”

    … “My midwife had established protocols with the hospital so that if I needed, she could contact them and they would be expecting me.”

    Now pregnant with her second child, Mrs Roche had ‘no hesitation’ in choosing the same process again …

    Midwife laws

    *  Midwives will be able to provide Medicare-funded care for the first time …
    *  Indemnity insurance will be a registration pre-requisite.
    *  … New laws fail to provide for midwives offering home births.
    *  Framework includes a request for midwives to form a collaborative relationship with a doctor.
    *  Midwives will require doctor to sign-off to access Medicare insurance and pharmaceutical benefits.

    … The new laws will provide midwives the ability to provide Medicare-funded care – but only if they are registered, and to be registered, they must be indemnified.

    … To be eligible for a Medicare provider number, midwives will need the sign-off of an obstetrician.

    “This provides an opportunity for doctors to have power over a qualified, experienced midwife,” she said …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    What are the disadvantages of birthing in hospital?

    Most women who birth in hospital do not have the same midwife with them throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal stay. They have different midwives for pregnancy care, then another lot of midwives for the birth (sometimes 3-4, depending on how long the woman is in delivery suite and whether the midwife has a student midwife working with her), followed by another lot of midiwves who work in shifts in postnatal. The lack of continuity means that the woman does not have the opportunity to really develop a deep sense of trust with her own midwife, something that is intrinsic to positive and safe birthing experiences.

    Women who are attended by hospitals have hospital policies drive their care. Policies around induction: when and how it’s done; when a caesarean is done; how often they are to be examined; which women are to be continuously monitored; which babies are to be admitted to the nursery and so on. It’s a bit like checking a box and then applying a treatment or intervention – without first checking if that treatment or intervention is genuinely needed in the woman’s case.

    When women have their own midwife with them – either for hospital, birth centre or home birth, they have the full range of options open to thema nd they are fully informed and able to make their own decisions around pregnancy and birth care.

    birthing options

    To learn more about birthing options, why not come along to the Essential Birth Consulting workshops?

    Can I have a midwife as additional support in pregnancy?

    Absolutely! It’s a great way to supplement and complement the care option that you have chosen. You can have a midwife as additional support whether you’re going to a public or private hospital, and even if you also have a private obstetrician. See here for details of birthing statistics with and without your own midwife.

    midwife medical offset?

    It’s called the net medical expenses tax offset. Contact your registered tax agent or accountant for more advice. my understanding is that once you have $1500 in out-of-pocket medical expenses (doctor’s fees, midwifery, prescriptions, optical, dental etc) you can claim 20% the cost through tax.

    midwifery care fees

    Private midwifery costs somewhere between $3000 and $6000. Essential Birth Consulting has new payment structure where families may choose to pay by the hour, potentially making this the best value midwifery service in Sydney, at around $3000 for a complete package of pregnancy, birth and postnatal care. Birth support is available for around $1500.

    Are there any homebirth classed in sydney?

    Yes! Why not come along to the Essential Birth Consulting workshops?

    access to rebate on midwife visits

    After November this year, women who are planning a hospital birth with a private midwife will be able to claim a medicare benefit for midwifery services. The benefit amount is not known at this stage and it is likely that there may be some out-of-pocket expenses too, but it will bring down the cost once Medicare benefits are payable.

    Are hospital births unnecessary?

    Every woman will need to come to her own conclusions on this one. My opinion is that home is the safest place for a low-risk, healthy woman to birth her baby. Leave hospitals for those who need them! In that case, most women would actually birth at home.

    bowral midwife educator

    I’d recommend Peter Jackson’s Calmbirth classes.

    Can i have an epidural with a midwife?

    Absolutely! Although many women find that they don’t need one when they’re cared for by the same midwife and supported well in labour. My experience has been that the call for an epidural is mostly a call for more support and suggestions for getting though the labour. Epidurals are a good option for some women in some labours.

    Can midwives administer oxytocin at a home birth?

    Yes, if it’s to manage excessive bleeding after the baby is born, but we cannot use it to induce or augment the labour. Those interventions must be attended in the hospital as they carry risks to the baby. Midwives routinely carry oxytocics to births in case they are needed.

    Cost of homebirths in the illlwarra

    Private midwifery costs somewhere between $3000 and $6000. Essential Birth Consulting has new payment structure where families may choose to pay by the hour, potentially making this the best value midwifery service in Sydney, at around $3000 for a complete package of pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Does having gestational diabetes mean a c section?

    This would be a good one to ask your care provider. Generally speaking, gestational diabetes does not automatically mean having a caesarean.

    Private midwife public hospital sydney?

    Yes, it is possible to take your own midwifey with you in a public hospital. This service provides this as an option. Women book with their private midwife, booki into the hospital, receive all of their pregnancy care from their midwife, labour at home as long as possible with their midwife (even having the option of staying home if all is well), head off to hospital when the time is right, and then come home as soon as possible and continue care for 6 weeks. In the hospital, a hospital midwife will also be assigned to you.

    Pprivate midwives in Sydney’s east?

    Yes, this service provides private midwifery services in the eatern suburbs.

    Reasonable obstetricians north shore 2010

    What is reasonable? What is important to you? At the end of thr day, it’s about choosing a care provider who is suited to your needs. As experts in abnormal pregnancy and surgery, obstetricians are ideal care providers for risk-associated pregnancies. If your pregnancy is normal and you prefer a more natural option, midwifery care will best meet your needs. Private midwifery is the oldest form of continuity of midwifery care, however there is a price attached to this model as it is a private service. Public options are free but will lead you down the path of hospital policy and interventions.

    What is the difference in cost between public and private?

    Private has costs attached: obstetrician, paediatrician and anaesthetist fees, private hospital fund excess / co-payment, any other fees and charges from the private hospital (eg TV, phone, parking etc) and also tests and ultrasounds. Public is free if you have a Medicare card.

    Transition into parenthood

    These are highly recommended childbirth education classes that prepare couples well for the changes in pregnancy, birth and parenthood.

    vbac north shore private?

    It’s very unlikely to happen at North Shore Private! Around 5% of the women who have previously had a caesarean go on to have a vaginal birth in that hospital. Private midwifery care – either for home birth or hospital birth – increases that percentage to 80-90%.

    water birth private hospital sydney

    None of the private hospitals in Sydney allow waterbirth. Waterbirth is the norm in a homebirth and may be an option in a public hospital if there are midwives on shift – and baths / pools available – to facilitate this.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    New Reforms Enable Australian Midwives To Be Eligible Benefits

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The Australian Senate has passed historic legislation that provides long deserved recognition of Australia’s highly skilled … midwives.

    These reforms will give nurse practitioners and midwives access to the Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for the first time.

    These changes are a key plank in the Rudd Government’s health reform plans, funded through the$120.5 million maternity reform package. This reform improves the choices for Australian women to access high quality, safe maternity care as well as providing support for our talented midwives.

    The legislation will also establish a new Government-supported professional indemnity scheme for eligible midwives.

    midwives wishing to provide treatment under Medicare and prescribe medicines under the PBS will need to demonstrate that they meet certain professional eligibility requirements and that they have appropriate collaborative arrangements in place.

    The new professional indemnity scheme for eligible midwives will be available from 1 July 2010 and the new Medicare and PBS arrangements will be available from 1 November 2010.

    Today marks a new era for our health workforce – ensuring smarter use of our skilled workforce, and more encouragement to work in multi-disciplinary teams.

    This will help deliver better health and better results for patients.

    As a Government, we are extremely proud to be delivering these changes – providing new and innovative options for thousands of women and the community.

    It’s wonderful that for the very first time, women will have easy access to continuity of care from the same midwife who is also able to obtain direct consultation if needed with an obstetrician. Within the private system, there is the potential for continuity of midwifery and obstetric care: book with a midwife, see an obstetrician perhaps once or twice in the pregnancy, and then if they are needed at the birth (or at anytime in pregnancy) the woman is attended by an obstetriaian that she knows and trusts, who works in partnership with her midwife.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Controversial midwives laws pass Senate

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Midwives will be able to provide Medicare-funded care for the first time under a dramatic but controversial reform passed by parliament.

    … homebirthing advocates were still venting their fury at the laws they say strip expectant mums of basic rights.

    Under the new laws, a national register will be set up for midwives, who will require indemnity insurance before being signed up – insurance hasn’t been available to midwives since 2001.

    The government has promised to provide support for indemnity insurance, and offered a two-year buffer for those having trouble finding a provider.

    Insurance is not available for home birth, ie, the actual birth, but it will be available for pregnancy and postnatal care.

    … The new regulatory framework includes a request for midwives to form a collaborative relationship with doctors, requiring their sign-off to access Medicare insurance and pharmaceutical benefits.

    Health Minister Nicola Roxon said the laws were a vital reform, but also used the opportunity to criticise the coalition’s long-standing opposition to the changes.

    “Finally, finally, they have conceded that this is an important and historic occasion for … midwives and will be welcomed,” …

    … non-government senators were adamant their continued opposition had forced the government to improve what was flawed legislation.

    … Homebirths Australia’s Justine Caines said doctors were typically opposed to midwifery and midwives stood to be employed “to do (doctors’) lackey work”.

    “Nicola Roxon is really trying to straddle the professional turf war here between doctors and midwives,” … “That’s bitterly disappointing, rather than saying Australian women are the most important part of this equation.

    … The Australian College of Midwives said the changes signalled a significant step forward, but called on the government to ensure midwives offering homebirths can also be insured …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Medicare-funded Midwifery Services at Last

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    The following is a media release from the Australian College of Midwives:


    Medicare for Midwives an important step forward

    The passage through the Senate today of new laws giving midwives the ability to provide Medicare funded care to women as well as access to professional indemnity insurance is a significant step forward” says Associate Professor Jenny Gamble, President of the Australian College of Midwives.

    From 1 November this year, women will be able to … see a … midwife, and receive Medicare rebates for their visits to the midwife. The midwives will provide pregnancy and postnatal care in the community, and women may have the option of birth care in hospital from their chosen midwife.

    The midwives will work with obstetricians, paediatricians, GPs, maternal and child health nurses and others to ensure each woman gets the care that she or her baby needs.

    “We welcome Nicola Roxon’s support for women to receive Medicare rebates when they choose the care of a midwife’ Dr Gamble said. “Also welcome is the government’s move to support midwives’ access to professional indemnity insurance for the first time in many years’
    Midwives have been unable to buy professional indemnity insurance since 2001.

    ‘But we remain concerned to see that access to professional indemnity insurance becomes available for all midwives, including those providing professional care for women who choose to labour and birth at home.”

    “These reforms have the potential to greatly enhance women’s access to primary midwifery care as the Minister intends” said Dr Gamble. “We look forward to continued discussion with the government to ensure that the regulations supporting implementation of these new laws help achieve that goal”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    What are the advantages to having an independent midwife?

    Independent midwifery practice is the oldest form of continuity of midwifery care. Recent research has demonstrated that this form of care – where a woman is cared for by the same midwife throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period – is beneficial for women and families. It results in increased satisfaction with the birthing experience and enhanced safety. When multiple care providers are involved in a woman’s care, the chance of errors is high because care is provided in pieces. When a woman is cared for by one midwife, she has one point of reference, no conflicting advice, she can develop trust and a sense of security and the birth will generally proceed naturally.

    Who is the best obstetrician in Sydney?

    Good question! It depends how you define “best”. For many women, bedside manner is the only determinant of “best”, while safety records and intervention rates are rarely checked by women. It’s ok to ask questions of your obstetrician and to come to your own conclusions about who is the “best” obstetrician.

    What are my options for birth after July 2010?

    After July, they will be the same as they are currently, and homebirth will remain legal. The difference will be after November, when, for the first time, women will be able to book under the care of a private midwife and birth in hospital – hopefully public and private. Many women would like to birth in a private hospital but they want to be cared for by a midwife. Currently, there is no way to facilitate this: all women who birth in a private hospital must have an obstetrician. This may change in November. As well as this, women will be able to claim Medicare benefits for midwifery care and midwives will be able to prescribe medications and order tests and ultrasounds.

    Birth centre exclusion criteria

    Check with your birth centre. General exclusion criteria include twins, breech babies, high blood pressure, a need for induction or a request for an epidural.

    What is the cost of a midwife birth?

    All midwives charge different amounts, but in Australia you can expect to pay between $3000 and $6000.

    Do midwives give epidurals?

    No, midwives are not qualified or trained to administer epidurals. However the midwife can – on a woman’s request – call for an anaesthetist to administer an epidural.

    What are the positives of hospital birth?

    If you have any complications in your pregnancy, hospital might be a safer environment to birth your baby in. Some women feel reassured by the machines and technology that is commonplace in hospital. I encourage homebirth for all healthy women whose pregnancies are low-risk because home is the safest place to birth a baby. We don’t go to hospital for other bodily functions – unless something is wrong. Why is birth any different?

    How can a midwife own a private practice?

    Midwives are autonomous health professionals, just as dentists, psychologists and dieticians are. Midwives can provide care in any setting – including the home – and if obstetric care is needed, the midwife can access this for the woman readily at the hospital.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    informed consent and childbirth

    Every woman who is competent to consent, has the right to refuse any or all professional care. Informed consent must be obtained prior to any procedure being performed.

    how to minimise labour intervention in a hospital?

    The best way to minimise intervention in a hospital is to be as well informed as you can possible be about all things related to pregnancy, labour, birth, breastfeeding and babies. Read widely, attend independent childbirth education classes and consider employing a private midwife to be with you throughout your labour. She can help you to decide if the proposed interventions are necessary in your situation, she can support you emotionally, mentally and physically and she can aso help to ensure that your birth plan is respected without a fuss.

    Do any independent midwives in Sydney offer prenatal care for women who are planning to freebirth?

    Yes! This service enables women to access antenatal care from a midwife without the midwife attending the birth. Postnatal care is available if needed.

    Do you think there are advantages to continuous monitoring for low-risk women

    In a word, no. Intermittent auscultation is the method of choice. Continuous monitoring will increase the chance of a caesarean with no benefit to the mother or baby.

    How much is a private midwife

    Prices range from $3000 – $6000. Melissa Maimann offers for her clients to pay by the hour, making the service one of the cheapest.

    What is a good caesarean rate?

    The World Health Organisation recommends that no more than 15% births need to be caesareans. The WHO argues that when caesarean rates exceed 15%, the risks to the mother and baby increase on the whole. You’ll be hard-pressed to find a hospital with a caesarean rate of less than 15%, but birth centres and private midwives have caresarean rates of less than 10-15%.

    What is the best hospital in sydney for delivering babies?

    It all depends what sort of birth experience you’re after! If you’re wanting a natural birth, home birth will be the best option. If you want a natural birth in a hospital setting, the best options would be birth centre or private midwifery care for a planned hospital birth. If you’re wanting to have intervention in your birth, a hospital birth would be best. If you choose an obstetrician, you’re far more likely to have a caesarean, episiotomy, epidural, forceps or vacuum. Choosing your care provider is the single most important decision you will make in birthing.

    Is there a birth centre at westmead hospital?

    No, there isn’t. If you’re after a natural birth, the best choice would be a home birth.

    C section or natural delivery midwife?

    Midwves cannot perform caesareans. If a caesarean was needed, the midwife would call a doctor in to perform it. Most caesareans that are performed are unnecessary and increase the risks to the mother and baby. A natural birth is the safest way to birth, and midwives are qualified specialists in natural birth.

    giving birth after birth trauma

    Private midwifery care will be really important so that you can have the same midwife all the way through pregnancy, birth and postnatally. It’s also important to debrief your last experience and come to a place where you feel safe to birth again.

    high risk midwife sydney

    Midwives are not qualified to care for high risk pregnancies. We refer these women onto obstetricians. In most cases, one or two consultations is all that is needed with the obstetrician and the midwife continues the care of the woman.

    how many births proceed naturally

    What a great question! It all depends what care provider you choose and where you have your baby. You see, if you choose a private midwife and birth at home, you have about a 95% chance of having a vaginal birth. If you birth in a private hospital, you have about a 33% chace of having an unassisted vaginal birth. In some hospitals, the caesarean rate is more than the vaginal birth rate! Sad but true.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Homebirth: The great debate

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    IS giving birth at home a positive experience or and unnecessary risk?

    ASK any expectant mother what she’s hoping for when she gives birth, and she’ll probably tell you the most important thing is to deliver a healthy, happy baby. But in recent years there’s been great debate about the best way to do this.

    Is the ideal to have a child in the relaxed comfort of your own home, or does the medical expertise provided in hospital far outweigh the notion of giving birth in your own living room?

    Although homebirth advocates argue the former, it appears the choice may soon be taken out of their hands.

    Reports last year revealed that four babies in Sydney died in homebirths in the space of nine months, the NSW Government responded with a strong announcement: from July 2010, independent midwives will be unlikely to gain professional indemnity insurance – effectively making it illegal for them to assist at homebirths. The consequence? Homebirths are facing extinction.

    Obstetrician Dr Pieter Mourik believes the ruling will stop women taking unnecessary risks.

    “Women who choose to give birth at home expect everything to be normal, but they often don’t consider how far they are from expert help …” he says.

    “Eighty per cent of women can have their babies in a paddock – but the problem is choosing these women. You just never know what will happen.”

    However, Justine Caines, spokesperson for Homebirth Australia, says putting a blanket ban on homebirths will simply drive the practice underground.

    … “Many mothers have had bad experiences in hospital and won’t repeat that.”

    She continues: “Why does the government fund women who are choosing to have C-sections, but not women who are choosing to give birth at home?”LAST month a study of over 500,000 women in the Netherlands who gave birth at home … showed there was no significant difference between planned hospital births and planned homebirths in terms of babies dying during labour.

    It’s important to note when making a comparison between Australia and the Netherlands, that the Netherlands only has low-risk home birth. If there are any complications in the pregnancy or labour, women see an obstetrician and birth in hospital. This is not the case in Australia at present, but it’s the system that the Govt is trying to set up.

    … Dr Mourik says the study is misleading. “Firstly, we must remember Holland has very well-trained midwives who act almost like Australian GPs,” he says.

    “It’s also a small country with maternity units often within 10 minutes of someone’s house. The conclusions of this study are based on the availability of well-trained midwives through a good transportation and referral system – and that simply isn’t the case in Australia.”

    It’s not currently set up in Australia, but there’s no reason why it couldn’t be. A positive approach would be to set in place a system that supports women to birth at home, and a system that protescts the midwives who support women to birth at home. Home birth has always been and will always be. We can set it up so that it is safe, or we can hope it just goes away … it won’t.

    However, despite warnings from obstetricians, women are still choosing to have their babies at home …

    “Women should have the right to give birth wherever they feel safest – it’s up to them whether that’s in hospital or at home. But taking away our choice isn’t right. If there were more options within the hospital system, then perhaps more women would feel comfortable going to hospital.”

    I disagree that women should make the decision: it should be made within the midwifery partnership. This debate is not about the right of women to bitrh at home: this right is protected by law. This debate is about the mdiwife’s responsibility to pracice safely.

    The Health Minister is putting in place a system that will enable more women to access continuity of midwifery care with their chosen midwife in and out of the hospital system. Once this is in place, there will be more options within the hospital system, and hopefully fewer women who are traumatised by the hospital system.

    So is there a way to keep everyone happy?

    “Homebirth Australia would like the government to present a package for pregnant women that works a bit like the baby bonus,” … “Every woman would be given a sum of money to spend on her pregnancy treatment, then it’s up to her whether she sees a midwife at home, or an obstetrician in a hospital. It’s putting the choice back into women’s hands.”

    What about the option to have a baby in hospital with a midwife, or the ability for an obstetrician to attend a woman at home?

    However, Dr Mourik believes that when it comes to choice, the only factor to consider is the mother and baby’s health.

    “Only a tiny minority of foolish women would risk their own lives and that of their precious babies for an ideal,” he says.

    “How many doctors support homebirth? None I know – it’s too bloody risky.”

    Many studies opint to the safety of home birth for low-risk women who are attended by a midwife. Women who birth at home are amongst the most health- and safety-conscious people I know. It is offensive to comment that women who birth at home are
    risking their own lives and that of their babies, especially when the evidence is to the contrary.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Advocates defend their rights for homebirths

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    THEY were defending their right to give birth at home … Across the country hundreds of women held rallies …

    Homebirth supporters claim doctors and the Government are taking away the rights of women.

    Under the proposed Bill … doctors will have the final say if a woman can have a homebirth supervised by a midwife. Previously, private midwives could assist in a homebirth without a doctor’s consent but could not access Medicare rebates.

    Passionate homebirth advocate Andrea Smith … said, “We should have the right to choose however we want to birth.” …

    After July, midwives will need to work collaboratively with doctors. This will be the case if we are to attend homebirths or if our clients wish to access Medicare benefits for our services.

    Collaborative arrangements have not yet been defined so it is hard to say at this stage how they might look. It’s almost certain that high risk homebirths will be off the cards, so no breeches, twins, VBACs, post term or preterm women, or those with high blood pressure or problems in the pregnancy will be able to have a home birth. Women are concerned that these changes will limit their right to a home birth, but the government is concerned for the provision of safe homebirth services. These new laws do not actually prevent “high risk” women from accessing home birth, they just restrict the ability of the midwife to attend them by legistating that midwives will only be able to attend low-risk homebirths.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Roxon grilled over proposed midwife changes

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The Federal Government has been grilled at its latest community cabinet meeting over its proposed changes for midwives and maternity services.

    The Government wants to make midwifery services eligible for Medicare rebates, but only if homebirth midwives work in consultation with a doctor.

    Several women at last night’s meeting … told the cabinet ministers that the changes would restrict the choice of women who only want to give birth with a midwife at home.

    But Health Minister Nicola Roxon says the Government is simply taking a cautious approach.

    “To make sure we’ve got some backup protocols in place, so if something does go wrong that there are agreements with the hospital or doctor to be able to step in quickly,” she said.

    “And that is a conservative approach, but it isn’t a conservative approach to say midwives are doing good work, have never been recognised in the history of providing Medicare for the last 50 years and we’re going to actually change that.”

    She told the meeting that medical professionals should be working together.

    “I’m unapologetically on the record as saying let’s encourage people across the health services spectrum to work together and make sure that women can safely choose options that are good for them and suit them,” she said.

    Women who access private midwifery services will be able to access Medicar benefits. As well as this, midwives will be able to order medications via the PBS.

    The maternity reforms provide women with greater access to continuity of midwifery care. The standard care in a public hospital is for women to see one group of midwives in the clinic, another group in the delivery suite (who work shifts) and then another lot of midwives when they are being cared for with their baby. The maternity reforms will make it possible for more women to be cared for by their own midwife, whom they have chosen. The same midwife will provide care from the first antenatal consultation right up until about 2-4 weeks after the baby is born.

    This is a huge step forward for Australian maternity care. For the first time, women will be able to birth in hospital under the care of a private midwife. Private midwifery care will also be available for home births (as is currently the case). We are continuing to book women for home births beyond July.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Hundreds protest homebirth restrictions

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is stripping away a woman’s right to have her baby at home, protesters around the country have been told.

    Hundreds of people have come together across Australia at 13 simultaneous rallies to protest against the government’s planned overhaul of maternity care.

    NSW Greens MP Lee Rhiannon told a crowd of about 100 in Sydney that access to a homebirth was a woman’s right.

    “We are in an extraordinary situation when a woman can choose to have a caesarean but she can’t choose to have her children at home,” …

    Ms Rhiannon said the government had succumbed to pressure from Australian Medical Association, which is opposed to home birthing.

    The proposed new laws … will require all midwives to be insured … a two-year exemption will apply for up to 200 independent midwives, who are unable to gain insurance because it is no longer provided for home birthing.

    They will also have to work in collaboration with a doctor – who will be able to override their decisions – to access Medicare, insurance and pharmaceutical benefits for homebirths.

    … homebirth groups … say the practice will be forced underground, a concern that was also highlighted in a recent Senate inquiry.

    Christine Wrightson, who had two planned home births, one of which ended up being in hospital due to complications, told the crowd … “I had one child in hospital and one was born at home – for both births we chose to be under the care of a privately practising midwife,” Ms Wrightson said.

    “This was because it was extremely important to me to minimise the chance of medical intervention as I strived to have a natural birth …

    Women choose private midwifery care for a variety of reasons, not only to birth at home. For some, it’s to have a qualified advocate by their side in hospital, or to have extended postnatal care for 6 weeks, or to have antenatal consultations in their own home rather than attending the local hospital clinic. But for most women, the reason for having a private midwife is about the level of trust, security and confidence that develops over time.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Greens midwives report

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The Australian Greens are deeply concerned that a Commonwealth plan to effectively give doctors veto over the rights of midwives to practice will erode women’s care choices.

    “The Government amendments to their Midwives legislation are unnecessary and give doctors too much control over midwives practice” … “… any requirement that midwives must work in formal collaborative arrangements with doctors as a condition of insurance will further restrict women’s choices”.

    ” … the Midwives Bills do not address the needs of many Australian women who make the choice to give birth outside the hospital system, and we will continue to fight for greater choice and less interventionist maternity care. The amendments proposed by the Government further erode women’s choices …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwives protest contracts with doctors

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … Academic midwifery … researchers say [an] … amendment … that enforces collaborative arrangements on midwives will effectively hold the midwifery profession hostage to the whims of doctors …

    … Such an arrangement is unprecedented internationally, and would restrict midwife access and fragment care, says Professor Barclay.

    “This can effectively institute medical control over individual women’s access to Medicare funded midwifery care,” she writes

    … midwifery is strongly evidence based … showing that outcomes for women receiving continuity of care from known midwives were better than for women who received fragmented care from multiple midwives and doctors.

    “It is untenable that one professional unionised group has the potential to derail Australia’s long awaited maternity reforms,” concludes Professor Barclay.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Home births: deadly or desirable?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    After six hospital births … Melissa Read decided to bring her seventh child, Ayla, into the world at home.

    “Doctors had told me home births were incredibly risky but I did a lot of research and the midwives understood what I was talking about and how I felt,” Ms Read said.

    “It was an incredible experience that was more than I expected for myself, my husband and my kids.”

    Independent midwives have slammed reports this week that home births put babies at a greater risk of dying than those born in hospital.

    A widely reported … study showed that babies born at home are seven times more likely to die of complications and 27 times more likely to die from lack of oxygen.

    The Australian Medical Association (AMA) and the National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists used the study to warn against the dangers of home birth.

    But the report, which compared 297,192 planned hospital births with 1141 planned home births … also showed that the perinatal death rate was similar for both kinds of births.

    The 16-year long study recorded nine perinatal deaths in the planned home-birth group, seven of which were actually born in hospital, and 2440 deaths in planned hospital births.

    Home birth advocates criticised the report, saying the research was flawed. The report itself states “small numbers with large confidence intervals limit interpretation of these data”.

    However, homebirth studies in Australia can only include small numbers because less than 1% births occur at home.

    “In the 16-year study period there were only three perinatal deaths for which one can reasonably assume that a different choice of care provider, location of birth or timing of transfer to hospital might have made a difference to the outcome,” says the report.

    … the study showed there was only a slightly higher risk in choosing a home birth. And if done properly with a low-risk pregnancy, there was no real difference.

    Exactly. What the study really shows is that low-risk, midwife-attended home birth is a *safer* option than hospital birth. The issues are around risk assessment and management … and the right of women to accept or reject advice.

    “The risk is mainly in people who have home births that shouldn’t have them, such as having twins, a breach birth or people too far beyond their due date,” Prof Keirse said.

    These outcomes of these births is better when they occur in hospital.

    “A mother has to be responsible when deciding what kind of birth to have and these mothers are taking unacceptably high risks.”

    Prof Keirse said he was scared by the number of women choosing to have home births after already having had a caesarean.

    “When a problem happens and you are at home you have no real way of dealing with it,” he said.

    “One of these days we will not only lose a baby but a mother as well.”

    Homebirth Australia national secretary Justine Caines said the reporting of the study by the AMA was irresponsible.

    “I think they are trying to push a political agenda and outlaw or force home birth underground, which is incredibly irresponsible,” Ms Caines said.

    “The report says there are 7.9 deaths per 1000 in planned home births, compared to 8.2 in planned hospital births, but they didn’t all stay home births and the real figure of births that actually occurred at home is 2.5 deaths per 1000.”

    The study title states it was looking at *planned* home birth and *planned* hospital birth. Actual place of birth was not the focus of the study. If the study focussed on the babies that were born at home, it would have had to include babies who were intended to be born in hospital, but arrived too quickly at home. These births are possibly riskier than planned home birth.

    Last year the Federal Government refused to include home birth under its midwifery indemnity scheme.

    The decision forced many midwives underground and threatened to increase the number of women ”freebirthing”, or delivering at home without any medical supervision.

    This has not happened as the changes will not come into effect until July 1, 2010.

    Ms Caines said from July this year midwives were at risk of not being able to be registered under the Commonwealth reforms.

    “In the UK there is a legislative right that if the woman choses a home birth there is a responsibility that they have a trained health professional with them,” she said.

    In the UK, it is illegal for women to have unassisted births. We do not have this law in Australia.

    “A woman has a right to make an informed consent to a home birth and if she understands the advice she’s received it’s not my right to say you can’t do that.”

    AMA president and obstetrician Andrew Pesce said the study supported the association’s stance against home births.

    “The current evidence would mean we could not support home birth given that it is associated with higher risk of babies dying,” Mr Pesce said.

    “The risk of what is happening now needs to be acknowledged and the midwives and people involved in home births need to put plans in place to manage those risks.”

    The AMA admitted the study revealed many positives for home birth but maintained it was too great a risk for mothers and babies.

    SA independent midwife Julie Garrett said midwives were aware of the complications, but had a duty to support the choice of a mother.

    And this is the crux of the matter: midwives do not act irresponsibly. We do inform women of the risks. But women are free to choose amongst options and to make the right decision for them.

    Ms Garrett said the culture in Australia needed to change to support midwife-based care as an alternative.

    “In England and New Zealand they are bringing in home births, while Holland has an almost completely midwife-based care model. It’s the culture here that needs to change. Women should be able to choose.”

    In the UK, NZ and the Netherlands, health policy supports low risk home birth. Even in a country such as the Netherlands, where home brith is a normal birthing option, the home birth rate is only 30%. 70% women need to birth in hospital or choose to birth in hospital, and there is no stigma attached to it. In a country such as Australia, with a caesarean rate in excess of 30%, a maximum of 70% women will be “eligible” by risk-assessment standards, to birth at home. Add to that twins, breeches, women going over 41 weeks or less than 37 weeks, high blood pressure, gestational diabetes, big babies and so on, and you can understand that even if home birth is a government-supported option, it will not be an option for the majority of women.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Home births multiply death risk by seven

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    BABIES are seven times more likely to die during home births.

    That is the finding of a study conducted by Marc Keirse of Flinders University … who examined data on almost 300,000 births in South Australia between 1991 and 2006.

    Babies born at home were also 27 times more likely to suffer asphyxiation during labour …

    … The AMA is backing the federal government’s proposed overhaul of home birthing laws, which will require all midwives to be insured and join a national register.

    … a… Senate committee recognised the legislation could drive home births underground.

    … Professor Keirse said the home births regime needed a stronger safety net.

    “Prohibition doesn’t work. It would just make it less safe than it already is” Professor Keirse said.

    “But what we should do is have a larger safety net to make sure people are doing it properly.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Homebirth ban may create risk

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    AN ONLINE poll has found huge opposition to draft Federal Government laws which would effectively ban homebirths and could lead to women choosing to freebirth.

    The parenting social networking site BellyBelly.com.au found 94 per cent of the 400 respondents opposed the amended legislation …

    … 30 per cent of respondents said they would consider freebirthing – giving birth without medical assistance – if not allowed to choose their own midwife.

    Under the Federal Government’s draft health practitioner regulation law, independent midwives could be deregistered unless they have private indemnity insurance.

    So far, the government has failed to include homebirths in the indemnity scheme while insurance companies refuse to insure private midwives.

    Proposed changes … would also see midwives forced to work alongside obstetricians.

    … “Women are very angry, passionate and strong-willed on this topic and feel that their rights as a woman are being threatened,” she said. “Many members commented that they are appalled that the government thinks it has the right to choose where and how they birth their babies.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Home birth program that delivers

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    It took Bailey … only 75 minutes to slip calmly into the world, amid the comforts of his own loungeroom, unaware he was quietly making history.

    Bailey … is one of a handful born at home under the guidance of midwives from St George Hospital, which runs the first publicly funded scheme of its kind in NSW …

    ”After having a hospital birth for my first child, [Bailey's birth] was very, very different and it was amazing to be told that everything was my choice, my decision,” his mother, Claire, 32, said yesterday. ”It was unbelievably calm and relaxed.”

    Home birthing … is now regarded by most obstetricians as controversial and dangerous.

    Last year the Federal Government refused to include home birth under its midwifery indemnity scheme, which forced many midwives underground and threatened to increase the number of women ”freebirthing”, or delivering at home without any medical supervision.

    Private home birth services have not been forced underground!

    … home birthing advocates are hoping a review of the program … could change the way birth is viewed …

    This would be wonderful! The program opens the home brith option to a more mainstream population who might not otherwise have considered home birth.

    A study of the first 100 women booked to use the service found 63 per cent successfully delivered at home with no intervention or pain relief and minimal vaginal tearing.

    Thirty women were sent to hospital before going into labour and seven were transferred during labour …

    ”It shows that in a controlled environment where midwives are protected by the policies and protocols of a public hospital, home birthing is a safe option for women at low-risk,” the co-director of Women’s and Children’s Health at St George Hospital, Michael Chapman, said yesterday. ”… I’d hate for this study to be used to support programs where there are not over-arching checks and balances in place, but this shows it can be a safe process.”

    The program, launched in 2005, was helping to improve home birth’s poor public image, but was still too restrictive for most women, and had abandoned some in the late stages of their pregnancies, the secretary of Homebirth Australia, Justine Caines, said. ”… this program excludes women without a strong evidence base,” she said.

    ”Women have a right to informed consent and there is an ethical responsibility for a health service not to abandon [them], instead to offer the best health care possible consistent with a woman’s choice.”

    While the home brith service might be considered restrictive, this can also be considered to be providing a safe margin within which home birth services can commence and continue. Birth centres are also considered restrictive by some, but most women wo book into a birth centre will birth there safely.

    I do not agree with the comments about the program “abandoning” women. To my knowledge, this has never happened. A public health service is obliged to provide a basic and safe level of care, and this is done. When a woman’s clinical situation suggests that birth centre or delivery suite care would better meet her needs, this is provided. This is not abandoning women.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Never again in a public hospital

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The Age special report on maternity care drew a range of responses …

    I GAVE birth to my first child last year in the … maternity ward as a public patient.

    Nothing could have prepared me for my horrible birth experience – ”herding yards” does not go nearly far enough in describing the way the hospital treats new mothers and babies. The need to minimise expenditure combined with an almost zealous obsession with promoting breastfeeding created an experience so stressful that, for me, resulted in what I call post-traumatic birth disorder – a fear of ever having another child in a public hospital.

    My baby was born with fairly high levels of jaundice, which results in a very sleepy baby who is unable to feed well. Bar going under the UV lights, the only means of reducing the jaundice levels is to ”flush” it out with fluid.

    Now that would be fine except for the fact that mothers do not produce milk for at least two days after a natural birth and up to five days after a caesarean. Not once was I offered formula to try to provide extra fluid for my baby. Instead, I was told to breastfeed and express extra fluid in between feeds.

    So, in pain after major surgery, with a baby too weak to feed well and not producing milk, I was left struggling for hours to try to provide enough fluid to help my baby.

    On day four I was about to be discharged when the attending doctor told me my baby had developed ”nappy rash” and might need antibiotics. At first the doctor said it would need a cream and I would still go home that day. A few minutes later another doctor said it was a ”severe” rash and my baby might need oral antibiotics.

    Then the head of pediatrics came to look at the rash. The attending [midwife] said they thought it was a hospital-borne staph infection, which was later confirmed. At this point I was about to have a breakdown from being exhausted, stressed and furious that no one had mentioned the staph to me.

    Following this diagnosis, I was discharged from maternity and my four-day-old baby was admitted as a pediatrics patient to be given IV antibiotics. The pediatrics ward is for children only so despite just having the caesarean and still being on painkillers, I was not considered a patient. I had to sleep on a fold-out couch to continue three-hourly breastfeeds but was given no food or additional pain relief …

    No perfect system

    WHEN my wife fell pregnant, our GP referred her to an obstetrician without discussing any options, such as the public system, birthing centres, home birth etc. This referral sent us down the path of the private health industry. We were keen on more natural options for childbirth, but it became increasingly apparent that our obstetrician was not interested in these options. Through our own research we found out about birthing centres, and decided that this was the go for us.

    … our daughter was breech. Through the birthing centre we were told of an obstetrician who manually turned babies in utero. We consulted him, and our daughter was turned. I am sure that had we stayed in the private system with our original obstetrician, we would not have been made aware of this option, and my wife would have had to endure a caesarean. This is one example of the ”over-medicalisation” of childbirth by the private health care industry.

    However, the birthing centre was far from perfect. My wife gave birth at 7.10pm on a Saturday. At 9.30 the next morning we were pressured to leave. We refused, and spent our full allotment of two days in the centre. A couple of days after we left, we received one follow-up visit from a midwife. She noted that our daughter was jaundiced, and advised that we put her in the sun for 10 minutes.

    Later that day I took my wife to hospital because she was experiencing pain after the birth. While we were there, a [midwife] noted that our daughter was jaundiced, and requested a blood test. The result was that she was rushed to the neonatal intensive care unit in a serious condition. An hour later the head of the unit informed us our daughter was suffering from a level of jaundice so severe that they saw it only once or twice a year, and that as a result, she could be brain-damaged and suffer hearing loss, among other issues. If I hadn’t insisted on taking my wife to hospital for her pain, I dread to think what might have been …

    Happy on home front

    I HAD a satisfying birth at home with the help of two lovely independent midwives. The continuity of care from our midwives has been exemplary.

    When I read accounts of less-than-adequate hospital-based maternity care, I can only say that home birth is worth every cent we paid.

    Improving the maternity system is simple: the Government needs to stop attempting to put independent midwives out of business.

    Support midwives

    MY HUSBAND and I saved our stimulus packages to pay a private home-birth midwife for the birth of our second child, due any day now. The continuity of care, with antenatal appointments in our own home, is wonderful. I feel much more comfortable ringing my own midwife with questions than I did when I was seeing a different midwife every time at the … Birth Centre …

    It’s not all gloom

    WHILE there is room for improvement in any hospital system, the headlines in your report unnecessarily spelt doom and gloom.

    In the past 10 years I have had three babies at the public … [hospitals] Each time I have been impressed with the service and care provided …

    My first baby could not attach to the breast, and … we were allowed to stay in hospital until day five after the birth. Every time I needed to feed her I buzzed for the midwife to help me, and never had to wait more than a few minutes.

    With my second and third babies we went home on day two, but we were ready … Postnatally, a midwife from the hospital visited me each day for two days after the birth. The midwives were caring, knowledgeable and helpful.

    Motherhood’s trauma

    I GAVE birth to both my sons as a public patient … There is almost no difference between the private and public patient experience, so having private health cover was of no benefit. My doctor was away both times but the on-call obs I had both times gave good care. Of course, they’re only there for the end bit and it’s the midwives who do all the work anyway.

    … my key criticism is that they sometimes forget the strangeness of becoming a mother for the first time. We are not used to being mostly naked in a room full of other people … We are flooded with hormones that leave us lost and confused. We think motherhood will be a tender and graceful time, when in fact it can often be a time, particularly the first time, when you feel frighteningly laid bare. I would have appreciated someone to facilitate a more caring and dignified transition into my new role.

    A cry for help

    A LARGE public hospital means a huge variation in staff on different shifts, which leads to inconsistent care and the danger of ”falling through the cracks”.

    Hence, many women benefit from having their own private midwife with them throughout the experience.

    Three days after the birth of my baby, I developed … postnatal depression … The [midwifery] staff … were seemingly inexperienced … I never had the same [midwife] more than once, which meant they were generally unaware of my worsening condition, which didn’t appear to be written in my medical notes. On the fifth day when I was to be discharged, I was stuck with terror at the thought of being home alone to cope with my newborn son …

    At home, things got worse. Feeling like you’re in an evil, black hole and not wanting to look after your own baby is not a pleasant state to be in. I had enormous problems with breastfeeding, which added even more stress to my already unwell mind.

    It was the visiting midwife from the hospital who was the catalyst in getting treatment for me. At first she offered me generic advice in a way that to me seemed somewhat ”hippie dippy”, so I had to persist in letting her know how bad I felt. Eventually she gave a card for the hospital’s crisis assessment team hotline. The team member I spoke to was exceptionally understanding and gave me some calming advice. The team followed up with regular phone calls to check I was OK before they were able to send out a diagnostic team, including a psychiatrist, a couple of days later. They were also responsible for my being admitted into a mother and baby unit in the hospital’s psychiatric ward soon after.

    Intensive counselling, medication, individual monitoring and support finally got me back on my feet. I am now what I would consider a ”normal” happy mother.

    Forgotten option

    YOU seem to have left out the home birth option in your report. Provided the woman is healthy, well-informed and well-supported, there is no reason she cannot give birth at home, with the aid of a trusted midwife. My wife did so three times …

    If necessary, a doctor can be called to render extra assistance, and in the rare case of complications, which usually become apparent slowly, the woman can be taken to a hospital.

    If more women gave birth at home, this would relieve the pressure on hospital resources. It would also enable women to give birth calmly, in a familiar environment, with loved ones close at hand, and usually escape the effects of postnatal depression.

    Rich feedback about our current hospital system. It will be interesting to follow the changes once private midwives are able to birth with their clients in hospital. We know that continuity of care is sought-after, as is explained in the above quotes. Private midwifery in hospitals will enable more women to access midwifery care on their own terms.

    I was surprised that the stories of women who were told they could not get the type of birth they wanted – such as vaginal breech, vaginal twins, VBAC and so on – were not mentioned.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Hospital rejects home birth trial

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    I was interested to read this article after the announcement that Victorian women will, for the first time, have access to publicly-funded home birth services.

    BENDIGO Hospital has decided it will not be involved in a pilot project that allows women to give birth at home.

    The State Government announced the $400,000 midwife-led home-birth project last week.

    It would allow women to give birth at home with hospital back-up for the first time.

    Actually, it has always been the case that hospitals have provided back-up for home births.

    … A country hospital was sought to participate in the program, but Bendigo Hospital did not throw its hat in the ring.

    … “Our current focus is to expand our Mamta program, where every woman has a dedicated midwife right through her pre-natal visits and delivery … Women in the Bendigo community have shown a great deal of interest in the Mamta program and there is currently a high demand for inclusion in this program.” …

    Other hospitals with continuity of care programs similar to the one described above have used these continuity of care programs to encompass home and birth centre or hospital birth.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Women warn they’ll risk birth without midwives

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    MANY future mothers say they will give birth at home without any medical assistance if proposed changes to maternity services proceed.

    Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon … has introduced a Bill that means doctors would have the power to veto a midwife’s involvement in births.

    Self-employed midwives
    say this would stop them being able to help with home births.

    Almost one in three respondents to an online survey … said they would find an alternative way to birth at home, even if that meant “freebirthing” – without a … midwife.

    The Government is saying `You can have your home birth, but not with a registered health professional’,” … “There have been some shocking outcomes from unassisted home births, but some will just do it.” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    AMA warns of ‘disastrous’ midwives scheme

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    When considering maternity service reforms, Australia must not to follow the ‘disastrous’ New Zealand example which puts midwives ahead of GPs as obstetric providers, the AMA says.

    In its submission to … Maternity Services Review, the AMA says Australia currently has “close to perfect” obstetric outcomes, with perinatal deaths rates continuing to drop.

    And while the AMA acknowledges that Australia’s 30% intervention rate is cause for concern, it says “It would be disastrous if these strong results for Australia were turned around because of poorly considered reforms.”

    In particular, it points to New Zealand, where maternity reforrms in 1990s allowed midwives to be ‘lead maternity carers’ …

    This resulted in GPs to withdrawing from intra-partum care, so almost all maternity care is now delivered by midwives or specialist obstetricians.

    As well as reducing the choice of obstetric providers, the AMA says there is emerging evidence of higher maternal death rates and perinatal death rates …

    … The AMA says it support expanded funding arrangements for midwives within a team-based, medically supervised model, using “for and on behalf of items” for midwives on the Medicare Benefits Schedule

    But giving midwives access to independent MBS items for maternity services would create two streams of maternity care, and would push up medical indemnity premiums by increasing the amount of ‘fire brigade’ obstetric emergency responses by doctors.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Right to Homebirth Threatened in Australia

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Homebirthing is a common phenomenon in most parts of the world, but in Australia, fears surrounding the process are threatening its acceptability.

    In New Zealand, Canada, the UK and the Netherlands, giving birth at home is a reasonable choice, supported by both governments and insurers.

    In Australia, however, the choice is threatened by proposals from Health Minister Nicola Roxon to leave midwives without insurance or funding to assist home births.

    The curbing of that choice started last year when Ms Roxon initiated the Maternity Services Review and announced Medicare funding for midwives in the 2009 budget. In conjunction, she proposed the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (NRAS) legislation, which would require health professionals to hold indemnity insurance so as to safeguard consumer safety.

    … the great omission in her proposal was homebirth midwives, who were not offered funding or indemnity insurance … In effect, this would condemn homebirth midwives to operate illegally if they wanted to continue delivering babies.

    … Gary Hastie, who has delivered all four of his children at home while supporting other home birthers, believes homebirthing “is the most natural process for the woman”.

    However, he has observed an increasing fear of home births, distrust of a woman’s ability to have a natural birth and a demonisation of … woman’s choice. “It’s a woman’ right to choose where and how and with who she gives birth,” he said.

    Nicola Roxon says she supports women having a choice, but is concerned with the consumer and ensuring a system of registration. It is “about lifting standards and ensuring that people are both registered, accredited and insured,” she said.

    … Dr Ted Weaver, says it is not only the size of Australia that is a problem, but also cultural differences. “The infrastructure in other countries is completely different from the infrastructure in Australia–these countries have a tradition of home birth.”

    Dr Weaver said the biggest danger lies when women get transferred to a hospital after complications arise …

    Doubts are expressed too about how qualified Australian midwives are. Dr Weaver says: “Their [overseas] midwives are better trained and act along more stringent guidelines, and the selection for home birth is much more rigorous than in Australia.”

    … While most high-risk women will be referred to a hospital by a midwife, … a very small portion of these women who consciously choose home birth … if they are considered “high risk”. “High risk” includes women who are having twins …

    Many women, including those considered “high risk”, do not want a hospital birth, which is considered high intervention and impersonal …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Protests demand maternity care choice

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Thirty supporters of maternity care choice staged a sit-in inside the Lismore office of local federal MP Janelle Saffin on November 9. They said the federal government must end plans to require independent midwives to have indemnity insurance.

    … the changes restrict women’s choice in maternity care because private insurers and the government have ruled out providing midwives with insurance for non-hospital births.

    In response to these moves, a campaign in support of maternity care choice has sprung up, including a 3000-strong convergence on federal parliament on September 7.

    … A government review is expected to introduce Medicare rebates for some midwifery services. However, … amendments … will require midwives to make “collaborative arrangements” with medical practitioners to qualify for rebates …

    … “In Holland, the option of … homebirth is the choice of around one third of expecting mothers”, she said. “A recent major study showed no differences in adverse outcomes between home and hospital births …”

    O’Driscoll said: the “campaign is an important part of the struggle for women’s rights and for a health system that puts people before profit”.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Rudd unmoved by homebirths protests

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says he is not moved by protests from doctors and midwives upset at changes to the health system.

    Doctors have rallied … because they are concerned new super clinics will put an end to the family doctor and drive young general practitioners away from the profession.

    … protesters … are objecting to changes which force private midwives who attend homebirths to work in collaboration with a doctor.

    Mr Rudd says … “Our job is to govern in the national interest – that means implementing what we said before the election in these critical reform areas, getting on with it … ”

    “… we intend to implement that which we said we’d do.”

    Protesters say amendments to the Medicare for the Midwives Bill will result in a medical veto over midwifery practice and homebirths …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    The future of private midwifery

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    There has been stong interest on the issue of the future of private midwifery since the Health Minsiter’s announcement that clarified the meaning of “collaborative practice”. Collaborative practice will mean that every private midwife must have a collaborative agreement with a private obstetrician who can effectively sign off on the midwife’s work. If s/he does not agree with the plan of care for the woman, the obstetrician may sever the collaborative arrangement. Furthermore, with RANZCOG and the AMA being opposed to home birth, home birth will not be an option in the private system, as it is currently. The exemption that was granted to home birth will have no meaning since collaborative arrangements will be a requirement for registration for private midwifery practice.

    There are several issues:

    - Midwives will no longer be able to practice in accordance with the International Definition of the Midwife. In the current climate of a world-wide midwifery shortage, it makes no sense to prevent currently practicing midwives from continuing to practice.
    - Midwives’ practice will be subservient to obstetric practice, potentially increasing Australia’s already high caesarean, induction and epidural rates. This, of course, increases morbidity for mothers and babies and compromises Australia’s safe record of maternity care.
    - It is likely that obstetrician’s insurance will forbid them from working with midwives unless the midwife works very closely with the obstetrician, for example in the obstetrician’s rooms. The obstetrician’s insurance company will no doubt not want the obstetrician to be taking responsibility for things that s/he has no direct control over (despite the fact that the midwife will have insurance too).
    - Home birth will not be an option in the private setting. Publicly-funded models will remain an option, but these are few and far between.
    - Private midwifery care in hospitals will restrict women’s choices, eg vaginal breech, vaginal twins and so on. It is highly unlikely that an obstetrician will agree to work collaboratively with a midwife who is supporting a woman to have say a vaginal breech birth.
    - The net effect will be the erosion of women’s choices, especially in the private system, and the restriction of a midwife’s practice to employed models within hospitals.

    No other profession is denied the opportunity to practice privately. No other profession is required to have sign-off from a different profession. And no other profession is legislated against providing the full scope of care by international definitions.

    While it is clear that the maternity reforms are not intended to be in any way related to home birth, it now seems that even private midwifery care for hospital birth is under complete threat of extinction.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Doctors to gain veto powers over midwives and birth choices

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Below is an important brief that has been prepared by Bruce Teakle of Maternity Coalition. It explains what the situation will be after July 1, 2010 for private midwifery practice for home birth and hospital birth. It affects all women who may be birthing their babies after July 1, 2010.

    On 5 November the Government announced that the “Medicare for midwives” Bills would be amended to require midwives to have “collaborative arrangements” with “medical practitioners” before being eligible for professional indemnity insurance or Medicare rebates:

    * before the midwife can access professional indemnity insurance, and

    * before women can claim a Medicare rebate for midwifery services.

    Doctors must approve each midwifeʼs entry to private practice:
    * Midwives will be required by Commonwealth law to have “collaborative arrangements” with “one or more medical practitioners” before being eligible for Commonwealth-subsidised professional indemnity insurance (PII).

    * PII will be a prerequisite for a midwife to enter private practice, under new national registration laws, being enacted state by state.

    * Doctors will be able to unilaterally withdrawal from collaborative agreements with a midwife, rendering her uninsured, and legally unable to practice in a private professional capacity.

    * This legally mandates medical control over midwives’ ability to register and work in private practice.

    * This will be set in Commonwealth law, which can only be changed by Commonwealth Parliament.

    * These provisions are contained in the Health Legislation Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Bill 2009.

    Doctors must approve womenʼs access to Medicare rebates for midwifery care:

    * Midwives will also be be required by Commonwealth law to have “collaborative arrangements” with “one or more medical practitioners” before their services are eligible for Medicare rebates.

    * This puts women’s access to private midwifery care under medical control.

    This is potentially defacto “parallel regulation” of the midwifery profession:

    * Medical practitioners will control the registration status of midwives, despite their being a discrete, separately regulated profession.

    * Medical professional organisations could set guidelines for collaborative arrangements, potentially forming defacto regulatory standards for midwifery endorsement and practice.

    This gives doctors right of veto over womenʼs choices in birth care:

    * Any birth care choice using private practice midwives, or developed under the Commonwealth’s new arrangements, will be subject to medical control or veto.

    * This gives medical practitioners unprecedented control over women’s choices and access to care.

    “Collaborative arrangements” may be legally restricted to privately practicing doctors

    * The amendments do not specifically include hospitals as able to form collaborative arrangements with midwives. They require medical practitioners to be “of a kind or kinds specified in the regulations”.

    * It is unclear whether a hospital, health service district or authority may be included within the definition of “one or more medical practitioners”.

    * Doctors who are employees of public hospitals can’t make “collaborative arrangements” as employees of the hospital they work for. They work for the hospital, attend their workplace when rostered on and collaborate in line with hospital policies.

    * A range of very serious consequences would flow if these arrangements were restricted to privately practicing doctors. Consequences could include:

    o No new midwifery models in public hospitals.
    o No private midwifery practice.
    o No homebirth care from midwives in private practice.
    o Practice midwives in private obstetricians rooms could be the only viable model of private practice or Medicare-funded midwifery.

    This brief represents the best information available to Maternity Coalition on 8 November 2009. We are actively seeking ongoing clarification and dialogue with Government in order to ensure women and families have access to accurate information. For full text of amendments click here.
    For more information contact: Bruce Teakle 07 3289 0231

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Women to protest maternity reforms

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … women will rally … to protest the … government’s maternity services reforms.

    Health Minister Nicola Roxon … announced that Labor would amend draft laws before parliament to make it clear … midwives could only access the Medicare Benefits Schedule and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme if they worked in collaboration with a doctor.

    The Australian Private Midwives Association is concerned the requirement will make … midwives beholden to doctors.

    “Placing one profession at the complete mercy of another … makes a mockery of professional regulation in this country,” … “Many choices such as homebirth … may be lost if doctors do not form … agreements with midwives.”

    Homebirth Australia … said the government was trying to make homebirths an “administrative impossibility” for women.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    The end of private midwifery practice in Australia

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    THE HON NICOLA ROXON MP MINISTER FOR HEALTH AND AGEING

    MEDIA STATEMENT – 5 NOVEMBER 2009

    Midwives/ Nurse Practitioner Amendment

    The Minister for Health and Ageing, Nicola Roxon has today circulated an amendment the Government intends to introduce … this amendment will simply clarify in legislation that collaborative arrangements with medical practitioners will be required to access the new arrangements.

    … These bills are a key plank of the Government’s 2009/10 Budget commitments which recognises for the first time the role of appropriately qualified and experienced midwives … in our health system.

    The International Definition of a Midwife, as accepted by FIGO, ACMI and the International Confederation of Midwives states:

    A midwife is a person who, having been regularly admitted to a midwifery educational programme, duly recognised in the country in which it is located, has successfully completed the prescribed course of studies in midwifery and has acquired the requisite qualifications to be registered and/or legally licensed to practice midwifery.

    The midwife is recognised as a responsible and accountable professional who works in partnership with women to give the necessary support, care and advice during pregnancy, labour and the postpartum period, to conduct births on the midwife’s own responsibility and to provide care for the newborn and the infant. This care includes preventive measures, the promotion of normal birth, the detection of complications in mother and child, the accessing of medical or other appropriate assistance and the carrying out of emergency measures.

    The midwife has an important task in health counselling and education, not only for the woman, but also within the family and community. This work should involve antenatal education and preparation for parenthood and may extend to women’s health, sexual or reproductive health and childcare.

    A midwife may practice in any setting including in the home, the community, hospitals, clinics or health units.

    When the Minister’s Media Release is read in conjunction with the ICM definitoin of the midwife, we can see how contradictory the Minister’s Media release is.

    On the one hand, midwives will be required to work collaboratively with obstetricians or GP OBs, yet on the other hand, the Minister states how this “recognises for the first time the role of appropriately qualified and experienced midwives …” How so? If private mdiwives are required to work collaboratively with obstetricians, how are we working to the ICM definition as autonomous practitioners in our own right?

    It will be interesting to walk this path as it plays out. Will obstetricians have the same requirement to collaborate with midwives? Will they have to ensure that all of their private patients have a private midwife too in order to access PBS, MBS, insurance, and indeed to register?

    Possibly what would be a better system is a private health system that recognises midwives as experts in normal pregnancy and birth, and obstetricians as experts in abnormal pregnancy and birth. We need nationally-accepted guidelines for OBs and MWs that state whom the appropriate care provider is, and at what stage. Midwives have Guidelines for practice, as do obstetricians, however they are not the same. We would simply need to mesh these guidelines to form national gudelines for maternity care providers which would ensure that healthy, low risk women see midwives, maybe with one appointment to meet the backup obstetrician, and that women with risk-associated pregnancies see obstetricians in association with a private midwife, given that a midwife will be present at every birth.

    Certainly, as this legislation stands, it does spell the end of private home birth. RANZCOG has recently issued a statement that clearly indicates their refusal to sanction home birth. What private obstetrician will work collaboratively with a private midwife who is intending to birth with women at home? Extending this further, will a private obstetrician refuse to collaborate with a private midwife who intends to birth with women in hospital if the midwife’s clients refuse say an induction at term plus 10, active management of the third stage, a vaginal examination in labour etc? These are important questions to ask. It seems that going beyond July 1, 2010, right of refusal will only exist in the public health system and midwives will not be able to work in private practice on their own authority.

    Solutions, anyone?

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwife reforms face defeat

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Health minister Nicola Roxon has hinted that her landmark reforms to extend the roles of … midwives may be defeated …

    … she called on the opposition not to vote against the legislation … She said opposition health spokesman Peter Dutton appeared to be against the legislation, which will see … midwives given access to MBS and PBS …

    … Ms Roxon accused the opposition of siding with the medical profession … reforms had widespread community support.

    “I expect the Opposition to stop pandering to special interest groups, vote for this important legislation and demonstrate they are prepared to back our moves to implement long overdue reforms that support the growing role of … midwives … “

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    The real safety issues in maternity care

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Link

    Maternity care provides a classic example of the pitfalls of a specialist-driven model of practice in health care. It results in more expensive and interventionist care, rather than a community-based approach which could also help ensure a more equitable distribution of services. It has led us to talk about obstetrics, which implies a focus on a particular professional group, rather than maternity care, which implies a broader focus on the woman’s and baby’s needs, both before and well after the birth.

    Professor Lesley Barclay … is a leading proponent of the need to reorient maternity care around the needs of women and babies …

    “When women talk about what matters to them when it comes to childbirth, the issue they repeatedly mention is safety.

    But their understanding of safety around childbirth is often quite different to how health systems and many professionals define it.

    For women, a safe childbirth is not only about what occurs at the time of the birth. It also refers to longer-term issues, such as their social and emotional wellbeing in the weeks and month after the birth.

    When women talk about safety, they are also thinking about the increased rates of depression and anxiety that manifest after operative birth or the consequences of wound infection on general health.

    The Australian health system often makes it difficult for women to make wise choices around birth …

    For example, evidence shows for most women most of the time birth does not need to take place in hospital. Some women will only feel safe however, whether this is evidence-based or not, with specialist medical services and technology.

    The term “maternity care” … incorporates their social and emotional needs. It puts them – rather than the professional or the service …

    Evidence shows maternity care can be provided by both midwives and obstetricians in public and private sector hospitals and can be safely provided at home.

    … evidence also shows that safety from morbidity is less likely for Australia’s healthiest and wealthiest women cared for by private obstetricians in private hospitals. More recent epidemiological evidence shows as volumes of operative birth increases, deaths of mothers and infants are also increased by overuse of the very operation that was developed to save lives.

    So where does choice fit in this repertoire of terms, locations, professionals, services and outcomes?

    Safe birth should be the goal of choices offered to women and decisions taken by those who provide care for them.

    Unfortunately, the choices some professionals offer or accept are self or income centered and ignore evidence. As a consequence of gender-located power historically, and a rapid increase in the numbers of more technically oriented professionals in recent decades, health services and costs do not reflect women’s needs or evidence.

    The most important example of this is allowing caesarean birth to be a choice rather than only using this as the lifesaving emergency procedure it is.

    … caesarean birth is rapidly becoming a life threatening procedure itself because of excessive use … maternal death reviews and coroner’s reports now show the risks attached to using a major surgical procedure as a routine mode of birth.

    Maternal mortality is between two and seven times higher for surgical than vaginal birth …

    … The physical, social and emotional morbidity attached to women who experience this mode of birth is not recognised therefore ignored within acute care hospitals but is evident in their homes and the community.

    Research has identified that physical morbidity associated with CS is five to ten times higher than for women birthing vaginally. No less importantly there are also psychosocial consequences of surgical birth with women less satisfied, more concerned about the baby’s condition and fearful. Women delivering by CS report feeling less in control than women who have birthed vaginally.

    Research also shows rates of post natal depression significantly different between women who birthed vaginally and the group of women who delivered either by planned or unplanned CS … Women who birth by CS evaluate their babies less favourably, are less likely to breastfeed and/or feed for a shorter duration.

    Paradoxically, the choice to have a normal, safe, confidence affirming birth that is low cost and relieves pressure on hospitals is only available to a small minority of women.

    This is not possible for Australia’s most vulnerable women and families, who, the evidence suggests, would benefit most. How many rural or remote living Aboriginal women can opt for a home birth attended by a skilful midwife?

    … 1 in 10 remote living Aboriginal women in one large community avoid hospital services or skilled professionals because of the unacceptable risks to them of being evacuated from their community …

    Other Australian women with more options are also taking this route, fed up with what they see as biased, self-interested advice and unacceptable risks of our current system.

    To have real choices, one needs options and good information on which to base decisions. Better resourced women … can chase evidence themselves, or question doctors, hospitals and midwives …

    … there are some ultimate arbiters beyond opinion. One of these is the impartial review of evidence provided by such as the Cochrane data base.

    I saw to my great delight a writer (male and medically qualified) who also a Member of Parliament, recently quoting this source in a newspaper. His message, while aimed at indemnifying home birth midwives, was that home birth is safe.

    … home birth is indeed safer at times than hospital birth when planned and supported by good hospital care for rare emergencies.

    I wish the current president of the AMA, an erstwhile obstetrician, would be similarly correct with his claims that certainly are not recognisable as fact to those familiar with the evidence.

    Choices for women are difficult when all they receive is highly partial and ill-informed opinion. Choices around birth are important or women will opt out of a system that does not meet their needs.

    …. Should it be a matter of choice though for women to give birth via major abdominal surgery? Should we permit choice that means their babies avoid the process of vaginal birth that prepares them to live and breathe? Should it be women’s or obstetrician’s choice that health pays or heavily subsidises the avoidable costs of unnecessary operations that prevent other necessary surgery being performed and add to waiting lists? I think not.

    We need to recognise that operative birth is the option to use only when the risks associated with the alternative are unacceptable. This is not a matter of choice.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    No sense in denying women safe births

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me at Essential Birth Consulting or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    As a medical student, I am encouraged to think critically about health-care legislation. I can see no reason why registered midwives should not be enabled to attend home births, as a safe and desirable part of maternity services.

    … the weight of medical evidence shows that for low-risk women, a planned home birth attended by a competent midwife is essentially as safe as giving birth in hospital, and involves fewer interventions such as medicating for pain. The (noticeably fewer) studies that report a higher risk for home births often neglect to discriminate between low- and high-risk situations, such as a preterm or unplanned birth, or where the mother is not attended by a registered carer.

    The unavailability of a midwife will not prevent some women giving birth at home with no professional assistance. This year’s Maternity Services Review reported its concern about the ”small number of Australian women [who] are choosing home births without the support of an appropriately trained health professional”. Why, then, did it recommend making it harder for women to obtain such support?

    There appear to be two reasons. First, few women in Australia, 700 to 800 a year, choose a home birth. But this is no reason to restrict the practice further. A woman giving birth at home with a midwife will incur lower costs than one using a public hospital and the services of nurses and doctors. In many regional and remote areas , a midwife may be the only option …

    The second reason the report gives is that allowing home births risks ”polarising” the health professions and obstructing a collaborative approach to maternity services. I can only ask how restricting the services of one profession can promote a collaborative approach.

    Given the proven safety of planned, low-risk home birth attended by a registered caregiver, and its economical and practical benefit, it is strange and disappointing to see Australian women’s choices in giving birth restricted in this manner.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Delivering security for midwives

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    OVERTURNED meeting procedure and a unanimous vote will see Mitchell Shire Council requesting future security for home births in Victoria.

    Councillor Kelley Stewart – who has given birth to two of her three children at home – put a motion to council last week seeking written representation to the Federal Government in support of privately practising midwives.

    Her call comes as Federal Parliament prepares to debate a new Bill regarding public professional indemnity for midwives, which will potentially exclude privately practising midwives.

    … “… no private insurance provider will insure a private midwife, not because it’s a ‘safety risk’ profession, but because there are so few privately practising midwives that it’s not a profitable business,” Cr Stewart said.

    “If then they are excluded from this public indemnity, they will basically be banned from practising in Victoria because they have to be registered and insured to work in this state.”

    Cr Stewart raised the motion for representation to the Federal Health Minister as a matter of urgent business … councillors voted unanimously in favour of the motion.

    … private midwives were currently the only midwives in Victoria who attended home births.

    … “I made an educated, informed choice to have my children at home where I was relaxed, comfortable, my wishes, my needs were listened to and respected.

    “But it was not so much the location that was important to me but that one-on-one continuity of care I got from my private midwife.

    “I had the same midwife antenatally, during the birth, postnatally. She knew everything about my pregnancy – labour, breastfeeding issues – from start to finish.”

    Kilmore mum Lisa Costantin had planned a homebirth for her first child and, although she was transferred to hospital, was pleased to have had the choice.

    “Homebirth is not high risk – women have been doing it for years,” Mr Costantin said.

    “For any low-risk pregnancy it should be an option.

    “I had planned a homebirth but there were complications and when the time came my midwife said I should go and I trusted her.

    “You are not going to risk your baby just to make a stand on an issue.”

    Cr Stewart said that banning homebirth as an option in Victoria would force women to either go to hospital or choose freebirthing, which without appropriately trained carers could increase the risk to both baby and mother …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Home birth with a private midwife will be exempt from insurance requirements

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    Pregnant women wanting to give birth at home have won a reprieve after Federal Government and the States cut a deal today to allow midwives to continue practising without insurance.

    Health Minister Nicola Roxon announced privately practising midwives would have a two year exemption from obtaining medical indemnity cover.

    … Under the deal announced today following the Health Ministers conference in Canberra, midwives will be able to keep practising homebirths provided they warn expectant mothers they do not have insurance, they follow quality and safety guidelines being developed and each homebirth is reported to health authorities.

    The exemption will last until June 2012 …

    Fantastic news!! The details are still hazy though – will home birth be funded in any way? Will midwives who attend births at home be able to access PBS and order tests for their clients? Midwives will need to have insurance to register. What is the situation for midwives who only attend births at home? It seems that they will need to purchase an insurance product that they cannot use!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Put The Safety Of Babies And Their Mothers Ahead Of Home Birth Ideology

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    The title of this article is offensive to say the least! The vast majority of home birthing women do not put home birth ideology ahead of a safe birth.

    Australia’s peak group of obstetricians and gynaecologists today repeated its warning that home births – with or without a midwife – carry too much risk to babies and their mothers and the Government should resist calls to indemnify midwives outside of hospitals.

    For starters, she does not seem to even acknowledge the difference between midwife-attended home births and free births.

    The President of the National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (NASOG), Dr Hilary Joyce, congratulated the Government-majority Senate Committee investigating proposed legislation relating to the role of midwives, for putting the safety of babies ahead of protestations by a small but vocal minority of people.

    “I would urge all politicians to look to the evidence and to speak to the doctors and the midwives who have to deal with some of the tragic consequences of home births,” Dr Joyce said today.

    “Australia has one of the safest and highest quality maternity services in the world where specialist doctors work side by side with qualified midwives to ensure babies and their mothers have a safe and successful birth experience.”

    Safe and successful? Many women who enter the hospital system to give birth come away traumatised. The majority of women who birth at home with a midwife are happy and satisfied with their experience. Rates of mortality are the same for low risk women whether they birth at home or in hospital. But morbidity is far higher in hospital.

    … “There is irrefutable evidence that women and babies are significantly safer in hospitals because of the immediate access to specialist care. Thankfully, only 0.25% of Australian women risk their lives and that of their babies by choosing a home birth.”

    I’d like to see this irrefutable evidence. I cannot find it. “only 0.25% of Australian women risk their lives and that of their babies by choosing a home birth.” – is this offensive or what? The vast majority of home birthing women I know will not risk their baby’s life or their own simply to birth at home.

    Dr Joyce said the Minister for Health and Ageing was acting in the best interests of babies and their mothers by refusing to financially endorse the unsafe practice of delivering babies at home.

    “There are things that can go wrong suddenly in a birth which, if not under specialist care or near medical assistance, can result in an avoidable death or permanent injury,” Dr Joyce explained …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Hospital birth?

    For further information about midwifery and birthing services, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.


    Link

    FOR a group of Melbourne parents … maternity service reform is not just a concept but a source of pain and hope.

    Seven women and one man told of traumatic childbirths in the hospital system. They described physical and emotional scars to pressure the Federal Government to extend support for private midwives and home births.

    Karen … said she believed a series of bad decisions in hospital had led to the death of her third child … the experience had left her shattered and angry about what she called a lack of accountability.

    Sharon and Anthony said the birth of their first son had turned into a nightmare after a promising start. A doctor declined their request for an epidural, telling them: ”You will have an immediate C (caesarean) section or you will have to transfer out of the hospital.”

    After a long and traumatic operation, Charlie was born safe and well, but Anthony said ”the obstetrician talked to me and he told me it was my fault about what happened – and he said, ‘You haven’t got me at my best and I haven’t done my best work’. I was just shocked.”

    Midwife Sally-Anne Brown, of the Australian Private Midwives Association, said these traumas showed that the maternity system was ”a broken mess”.

    But a proposed national registration system for midwives threatens to effectively ban private operators and home births, requiring all registered midwives to be insured, but not covering home births.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Birth wrangle

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    A warning from Australia’s peak group of obstetricians and gynaecologists that home births carry too much risk to babies and their mothers is completely false, according to an Echuca midwife of 25 years.

    The National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (NASOG) claims home births, with or without a midwife, are too risky and the government should resist calls to indemnify midwives outside of hospitals.

    How can she compare midwife-assisted home births and free births?

    Proposed laws … would require midwives to have professional indemnity insurance before they could be registered.

    But such insurance is unavailable for people who work outside hospitals.

    Midwife and maternal and child health nurse Andrea Quanchi, who operates Echuca-Moama Midwifery and Parenting Service, said if the laws were passed, said she could possibly face fines of up to $30,000 for helping with home births.

    … “Then there will be no regulation of midwifery standards and that is dangerous.

    … There was nothing dangerous about home birthing – it was about providing women with choices, she said.

    … “If there is an emergency, we transfer them to the hospital … The transfers run seamlessly … ”

    Mrs Quanchi said she didn’t force clients into home birthing and had been present at countless hospital births.

    “It’s not my decision as to where they want to have their baby,” she said.

    “It can’t be their ultimate goal. It’s about what’s right for them at the time.

    “If something goes wrong, we’re out of there.”

    NASOG president Hilary Joyce said Ms Roxon was acting in the best interests of babies and their mothers by refusing to financially endorse the “unsafe practice” of delivering babies at home.

    “There are things that can go wrong suddenly in a birth which, if not under specialist care or near medical assistance, can result in an avoidable death or permanent injury,” Dr Joyce said.

    And far more goes wrong when women birth in hospitals with every machine that goes ping.

    That has not been the case with any of Mrs Quanchi’s 75 clients, over a 10-year period.

    “Home births are for women who have low-risk pregnancies, no complications and have a good back-up plan. They also need to be from a good, stable home environment,” Mrs Quanchi said.

    “We’re not in the danger game of proving a point.”…

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Dutton Duds Our Valuable Nurse And Midwife Workforce, Australia

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    The Liberals have put at risk the Rudd Government’s landmark reforms for the nursing and midwifery workforce by refusing to indicate the opposition will support the bill before the Parliament.

    In a contribution of 30 minutes, the Shadow Minister for Health and Ageing couldn’t bring himself to support these important reforms that will improve choice and support for thousands of families in our community.

    Provided that they birth in hospital …

    … These landmark changes for nurses and midwives will give them access to the Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for the first time. These changes will provide all Australians with greater choice about their healthcare via improved access to the skilled services of nurses and midwives.

    Again, only for hospital birth. Women choosing home birth will be on their own.

    This legislation is a key plank of the government’s $120.5 million maternity reform package, improving the choices for Australian women in accessing high quality, safe maternity care, as well as providing support for the maternity services workforce.

    On the separate issue of Registration and Accreditation that is causing concern for those in the community that support homebirths …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Fight for right to homebirth

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    MELISSA McFarlane is devastated expectant mothers could soon be denied the right to the intimate and private homebirths she received.

    … Under the legislation, midwives must be insured to join the register but private insurers no longer provide cover for homebirthing and the Federal Government has also refused to subsidise professional indemnity for homebirth claims.

    As a result, up to 200 independent midwives could be deregistered from July 2010. If they continue working they risk fines of up to $30,000.

    Ms McFarlane delivered three of her four children through homebirths in the comfort and familiar surroundings of her own home.

    She said the homebirths of her last two children were an incredibly intimate, gentle and beautiful experiences.

    They allowed her children to be present at the birth of their siblings, minimised the disruption to family life and kept her in the comfort of her own home.

    “There’s no diseases at home … it was my normal environment, food from my own fridge, my normal air,” she said. “I have found it a very gentle process.”

    … Supporting Ms McFarlane through her four pregnancies was the same midwife, who she said was the utmost professional.

    … A Senate inquiry last night found that homebirthing may be driven “underground” if the Federal Government’s proposed changes to maternity laws were passed …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Homebirths hit by insurance law

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    NORTH COAST midwives who attend homebirths could soon be out of a job after a Senate committee yesterday recommended all homebirth midwives be insured.

    Midwives warn this would shut them down because no insurance company in Australia will cover homebirths.

    … Ms Juszczak said women intent on having their babies at home would no longer be able to access a registered midwife and would instead have to rely on unqualified help or ‘go it alone’.

    “I believe that in most circumstances homebirth is safe, but there are circumstances where intervention is necessary and someone who is not skilled may not pick up on those instances,” Ms Juszczak said.

    “So potentially, in those few cases, it will be more dangerous for those women and those babies.”

    … “But even if the midwife can’t gain insurance, she is still registered … so you know that the woman has a particular level of expertise and experience,” she said. “The impact of this is that women will no longer be able to access a registered midwife for a homebirth, so basically it opens up the door to unsafe practice for women in homebirths.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Please Don’t Hurt Mothers-to-Be: Doctors Plead With Government.

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    Australian families who seek specialist obstetric care during pregnancy will up to $1,830 worse off if the Australian Government does not reconsider its proposed cuts to Medicare payments before the Senate this week.

    It doesn’t seem to concern NASOG that Australian families are up to $5,000 “worse off” for seeking private midwifery care. Private midwifery has never been afforded medicare benefits, despite much research that supports the role of the midwife for most women.

    … Dr Hilary Joyce, President of the National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (NASOG), warned that under the Bill going before the Senate this week, all patients embarking on having a family will be worse off when they go to see their specialist obstetrician.

    “All couples who undertake fertility treatments and then who need special obstetric care throughout their pregnancy will be hit harder still with the double financial whammy of fertility treatment and maternity treatment cuts to Medicare,”

    I’m not clear why Hilary believes that women who have fallen pregnant through ART require ongoing obstetric care. She has made a statement without backing it up by research. I’d like to read the research that states that this is so. While pregnancies that have been achieved through ART may have risks associated with them, that is also true of every pregnancy. No pregnancy is risk-free. There’s no reason not to have midwifery care pre-emtively. If complications are detected or even suspected, the midwife will make a referral to a hospital or obstetrician, and the woman will receive appropriate care.

    “We are concerned about the families who won’t be able to afford the choice of their own obstetrician because of these proposed Medicare cuts. … Will they be forced into the already overwhelmed public hospital system? …

    The proposed changes prevent women from accessing the midwife of their choice. Hilary does not seem to be concerned by this. These women will also be forced into the overwhelmed public system.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Mums fight for home births

    For further information about home birth or midwifery, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    Four Busselton mothers concerned about the future lack of choices for expectant women are going to join a rally at Canberra House next month.

    Mother-of-five Jane Reynolds said proposed changes to Commonwealth legislation … would take away the choice for women to home birth.

    Mrs Reynolds said women in the South West depended on independent midwives for home birth deliveries but this would be hindered by their inability to secure professional indemnity insurance.

    … Busselton was in an unusual position with three independent midwives and two in Bunbury and had become an “enclave for home births” with a heightened awareness of the proposed legislation, Mrs Reynolds told the Times.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Home births to be outlawed

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    HOME births would be driven underground by new maternity laws, a Senate committee has admitted.

    The community affairs committee said that without special insurance, midwives would be unable to legally practice.

    “The committee acknowledges the concerns expressed by stakeholders that an unintended consequence of this may be to drive home births underground unless an exemption is granted or an insurance product found,” …

    But it said the changes should be approved regardless.

    Home birth advocates said the recommendation was insane.

    The proposed laws would require midwives to have professional indemnity insurance before they could be registered. But such insurance is unavailable for people who work outside hospitals.

    “It categorically will be unlawful,” Homebirth Australia secretary Justine Caines said.

    “Without amendments, it should not pass through.”

    Health Minister Nicola Roxon said she was trying to secure special insurance cover that would allow midwives to work outside hospitals.

    … Mara Dower, who gave birth to her son … and daughter … [at home], said women would be deprived of the most nurturing environment if midwives were prevented from overseeing home births.

    She said midwives were needed for many women to have safe births, with the level of medical interventions and unknown people involved in hospital births making it an unrealistic option for some.

    “I would definitely go underground and still have a midwife if I had to,” she said.

    “It would increase the dangers for women because having a personal midwife means they have a duty of care.

    “… you get the advice, … feel cared for and looked after, and you have information at your fingertips.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Homebirth mums ‘forced to use unregistered midwives’

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    A national maternity consumers’ group says women will be forced to use unregistered midwives if they want homebirths from the middle of next year.

    … under the proposed amendments, new indemnity insurance arrangements for midwives will not apply to homebirths.

    … “Women will be able to choose a non-registered care provider to give birth at home, which is of concern to the Maternity Coalition,” she said.

    “We would really like women to be able to access a registered midwife for their care during birth and labour at home.”

    So long as we don’t use the title “midwife”, and are not registered as midwives, we will be able to attend home births. However, midwives who are not registered will not be able to access valuable continuing professional development exercises, participate in the profession, access additional care for our clients, or have anything to do with the profession. We will nto be able to transfer in with our clients if hospital transfer is necessary. We will need to leave our clients at the front gate of the hospital. They will need to lie about all the antenatal and labour / birth care that they have received. Is this how we provide safe and effective care in 2010? It sounds like a mighty step backwards to me!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Mums angry over fed govt homebirth midwife row

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    … federal government legislation could drive the practice of homebirthing underground.

    In the chilly pre-dawn moonshine of May 3, 2008, Felicity Gibbins went into labour …

    The night was still and the household calm as the family prepared for the arrival of their second child …

    … A homebirth is such a beautiful and intimate experience, Felicity says.

    “The power of the mind is really an amazing thing. My attitude towards the pain was that each contraction was going to bring me one step closer to seeing my baby,” she says.

    “I was really excited about meeting my baby. I’d already fallen in love with it. It was my little friend who I would talk to all the time.”

    Using visualisation, meditation and yoga techniques, she worked through the pain, surrounded by her loved ones.

    … “We had talked a lot about having the baby and read a few children’s homebirth books, so she was aware of what was going on.

    … Maya helped Paul fill the homebirth pool with warm water and baby Haile arrived at 8.22am weighing 3.9 kilograms.

    “I pulled him out and into my arms,” Felicity says.

    “It was delightful … my eyes were closed and I can still feel him now, his wrinkly skin over his head, his arms and legs stretched out searching for his mummy like a little slippery frog,” she says.

    Coaching her through this birth, as she had with Maya’s homebirth, was [an] independent midwife … with 25 years’ experience.

    But a federal government proposal could effectively criminalise midwife care for homebirths, jeopardising the health and safety of mothers.

    Under the proposed new laws, debated in the House of Representatives this week, midwives must be insured in order to be registered.

    But since 2001, private insurers stopped providing cover for homebirthing and the federal government has also refused to subsidise professional indemnity insurance for homebirth claims.

    … independent midwives could be deregistered from July 2010. If they continue working they will risk fines of up to $30,000.

    Felicity says if she does have a third child she could not imagine going through labour in the public setting of a hospital after two special experiences at home.

    But, she said she would not have a homebirth without a midwife … I felt really confident.

    “In the hospital you can’t have one-on-one care with a midwife … there might be one midwife for three or four women.

    “Being told where I should birth my next baby is offensive … ”

    … “I could be at … the hospital and catch people’s babies but you don’t necessarily remember their names; with homebirths you remember everything about it because you have that opportunity to make that connection,” …

    “I do all the [antenatal] visits in the client’s time and then give labour support and then post-natally you see them every day for a week or two … so it’s a huge amount of hours that goes into each client.

    “You become very good friends. It’s still professional but it’s more than that.”

    … if the government changes are adopted, the health of women and their babies could be at risk.

    “There’s certain potential for danger,” … “Women could go it alone.”

    … it’s a myth that it’s mostly hippies who choose to have homebirths.

    “I have had clients who are doctors, lawyers, people in financial services, IT – all sorts of career paths,” she says.

    “It’s become a mainstream option.”

    … “Women have the opportunity if they have had birth trauma to choose to have a caesarean, which comes at a higher cost to (taxpayers) with higher risk factors, yet women who are low risk can’t choose to homebirth which is deemed to be safe by world-wide reports.”

    … up to 2,000 women have home labours each year …

    Homebirth mothers and midwives will protest at Parliament House in Canberra on September 7 at 11.30am

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwife indemnity plan may spark GP obstetrician exodus

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    GP obstetricians could ‘down tools’ as a result of Federal Government plans to allow midwives to practise independently with subsidised indemnity insurance.

    The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) has warned the move could drive up doctors’ insurance premiums and force them to quit practice.

    “Obstetricians may be called in too late to manage an obstetric emergency and have to face the blame for a poor outcome, when an earlier referral may have averted a crisis,” the college said.

    “[If] premiums rise, that could be a considerable driver for doctors [to exit] the obstetric workforce, and we are already on… a knife edge with workforce,” RANZCOG president Dr Ted Weaver said.

    The college warning comes as three pieces of legislation were introduced to Federal Parliament that would expand MBS and PBS rights for midwives and nurse practitioners, and provide the former with federally subsidised indemnity cover.

    In submissions to a Senate inquiry into the legislation, doctor groups have called for clearer detail on the proposed collaborative models of care, amid fears the legislation will lead to fragmented and lower standards of care (MO, 31 July).

    There’s no reason for doctors to believe that their premiums will be affected by this legislation. Midwives will have their own indemnity. If a woman or baby needs to sue, they will sue the midwife for her part in what has happened, if negligence can be proved. Instances of unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct will be dealt with through disciplinary processes, as is the case currently. What the legislation does is to extend to midwives and the women they care for, the professional right to insurance that is shared by all health professionals. It places midwives on par with other professionals who are responsible for their practice.

    If RANZCOG / AMA believe that insurance makes a profession safer, as they have previously stated, they ought to be happy that midwives will now have insurance. They ought to be especially pleased if insurance would be extended to cover home births, which they see as high risk and dangerous. Medical groups have been heard to say that doctors are often left to “pick up the pieces” from home birth that have “gone wrong”. Well, if midwives are insured, they would not be sued in place of the midwife. So why aren’t RANZCOG, the AMA and other medical groups right behind our demand for insurance to be extended to cover home birth?

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwife laws may force homebirths underground

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    A SENATE committee has acknowledged that proposed legislation for midwives may ”drive homebirths underground”.

    The Government chairwoman of the Senate’s Community Affairs Committee, Claire Moore, said the three Labor members recommended proceeding with legislation that would expand the role of midwives and extend government support for medical indemnity cover for midwives operating in hospitals.

    Senator Moore said the legislation did not make homebirth unlawful, but separate legislation dealing with the accreditation of health workers ”may result in homebirths being outside the scope of practice of registered midwives due to the requirement for indemnity insurance as a condition of registration”.

    The committee acknowledged the concerns that ”an unintended consequence of this may be to drive homebirths underground unless an exemption is granted or an insurance product found”.

    Since the potential barrier to homebirths emerged, the Health Minister, Nicola Roxon, has indicated that she is prepared to consider ways of extending medical indemnity to homebirths, provided this could be achieved without making the insurance costs ”unaffordable”.

    The Liberal members of the committee, Sue Boyce and Judith Adams, called for the Government to commission an actuarial analysis of the risks of professional homebirth and, if feasible, make it eligible for government support.

    A Greens senator, Rachel Siewert, also called for the indemnity scheme to be extended to low-risk homebirths.

    ” … the voices of more than 2000 women speaking out on fundamental women’s rights has been ignored and given the sheer magnitude of the evidence put forward and the results the committee has come up with, it looks like we are getting to the end of the line when it comes to options.”

    More than 10,000 women are expected to attend a rally outside Parliament House in Canberra next month to continue the fight.

    If you’re wanting to have a home birth, it’s best to start trying for a baby now so that you birth before June 30, 2010. It’s almost certain that this legislation will be passed. National Registration demands that all health professionals have professional indemnity insurance to practice. That does not make home birth illegal. The other 3 Bills around PI for midwives and midwife eligibility for MBS, PBS and insurance, state that insurance will not be extended to home birth. That also does not make home birth with a private midwife illegal. It is the intersection of the 2 laws that make private home birth illegal.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Roxon joins mother of birthing battles

    For further information, contact Melissa Maimann at Essential Birth Consulting.

    Link

    The author of this article has got the facts very wrong, but none-the-less, it’s great to get home birth and midwifery in the media.

    THE Rudd Government’s threatened ban on home births is moving closer to reality …

    From July 1 next year, the requirements of a new registration scheme mean independent midwives – long denied medical indemnity insurance – will be fined $30,000 if they practice without it. This finishes their ability to work outside the hospital system.

    Midwives will not be fined $30,000. Midwives who practice without insurance may be deregistered. If we continue to practice midwifery once we’re deregistered, we face fines and/or a jail term. This is the same rule that applies to anyone who practices midwifery without registration.

    … Where to give birth, and who attends, is a medical decision. If a pregnant woman is competent and informed, it is her decision to make. Australian law allows patients to choose who will treat them and where, and even to refuse interventions – like transfusions – that medicos deem life-saving.

    Again, I disagree. The decision about where to give birth rests with the woman and the professional who is attending her. This may be a doctor (in which case, the decision is medical). However, for the majority of women birthing at home, the decision is a midwifery decision.

    This means that even if evidence showed that hospital births were life-saving, pregnant women could still refuse them. Given that the evidence shows no such thing, this right seems even stronger.

    A recent article in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology looked at 529,688 cases and found no difference in the health of babies born at home to low-risk women and those born in hospital. Another large study found that the only difference in outcomes favoured home birth, which produced babies with higher Apgar scores, and showed home births were less likely than hospital births to result in unnecessary and risky medical interventions, such as induced and augmented labour, forceps delivery and caesarean sections.

    … Denying independent midwives registration won’t stop women from birthing at home. It will simply increase the risks they take doing so. It will be backyard abortion all over again – complete with shonky providers, death and suffering – except this time it’s backyard birth.

    The mantra that birth is simply a normal part of a woman’s life is rubbish. It is an extraordinary event that most women will face just a few times. They need medical guidance, in the form of proper pre-natal care to know if home birth is a safe option for them.

    Professional, experienced, independent midwives can offer this advice, and a safe and secure environment for low-risk women who birth at home.

    Again, it is midwifery guidance, not medical guidance. If doctors supervised home births, there would be no home births.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448