Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

Midwifery services

Maternal Death following a Homebirth

Much has been published recently about the very unfortunate death of a mother following a homebirth with private midwives. No details have been released that could allow us to form an opinion that this woman’s death was “because” she birthed at home, and it is also possible that an appropriate and timely transfer was arranged and that she died of complications that arose in hospital. I am not privy to any more details than what can be found in the local press. Even though at this stage, no-one really knows how or why Caroline died, many people have taken the opportunity to make assumptions as to the exact cause of death, and more so, they are certain that her death would have been preventable and hence avoidable had she birthed in hospital. I am astounded that anyone could make such assumptions – and that the media would publish such opinions – when they are not grounded in fact.

So, what do we know?

Maternal mortality includes deaths in women up to a year after giving birth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy. The maternal mortality rate in Australia varies between about 8.4 and 11.1 per 100,000.

Direct maternal deaths are those that result from obstetric complications of pregnancy. This includes such things as amniotic fluid embolism, haemorrhage, infection and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

As well as direct maternal deaths, there are also indirect maternal deaths, and these are deaths that result from pre-existing disease which maybe aggravated by pregnancy or birth. This can include such things as heart disease, psychiatric causes, epilepsy and so on.

It has been suggested that since 1999, there has only been one other woman who has died following a homebirth attended by a midwife. The AIHW report for 1997-99 also describes another maternal death following a homebirth, however that was an unattended homebirth (ie, the woman had given birth at home without a midwife present). Both women died of postpartum haemorrhages.

The question we need to ask, is whether these reports of maternal death following homebirth reach statistical significance. In statistics, a result is statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It is possible that the two maternal deaths following midwife-attended home births are the only deaths we will have for the next 50-odd years; or it could be that in the next few years, we will have far more maternal deaths following midwife-attended homebirths. Certainly, other countries do not report an increased maternal mortality rate for women birthing at home with a midwife.

All of this said, it is incumbent on every midwife who attends homebirths to advise women of the increased risk of death and serious injury should a major complication occur at home. This is related to the lack of resources, staff and facilities at home and the time and distance needed to transfer to hospital in an urgent situation. This, however, is also the case in a smaller public or private hospital, where if something should go horribly wrong, those facilities would also not have the immediate capability to provide the best possible assistance.

In the event of major complications, a team effort is really needed: midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetist, operating theatre, intensive care unit, medications, IV lines, equipment for monitoring the heart and respiration and blood pressure, ultrasound imaging and so on. However, it also needs to be said that this would only be in very rare and exceptional circumstances that can mostly be known in advance. We also know that serious complications that can result in death are more likely when women have had interventions in labour and birth.

This is why women are encouraged to birth in hospital if their medical history suggests that they are at a higher risk of life-threatening complications in birth (eg epilepsy, clotting disorders, high blood pressure, and so on), and it also why midwives are reluctant to attend any form of intervention in the home setting. At the slightest hint of a complication, a responsible midwife will advise her client to transfer to hospital in the interests of safety.

All of this said (and done), low risk does not mean no risk. A perfectly healthy, low-risk woman experiencing a normal pregnancy and a normal labour can still experience a massive postpartum hemorrhage that cannot be effectively managed by the equipment available at a home birth. It also could not be managed at a small private or public hospital where theatre staff, anaesthetists, monitoring equipment etc might not be readily available. It is important for women to understand that while this is highly unlikely to ever happen, should it happen, it does increase the risk of death or serious injury (eg brain damage). It is a difficult task counselling women in very rare but very serious possibilities, and birthing women need to feel free to make the best decisions for them and their families, in the full knowledge of all possibilities. Midwives should not withhold this information from women as it is materially significant to their decisions about place of birth.

Certainly, the media takes the view that all homebirth deaths could be prevented by having those women birth in hospital. This may be true. Or maybe not. Private midwives examine the deaths of women in hospitals, and often comment that those deaths might have been preventable had those women birthed at home or with a private midwife in hospital. Cases of women dying following unnecessary caesareans. Women suiciding in the early postnatal period with no support in caring for their baby and ineffective antenatal planning for the possibility of postnatal depression. Women dying of postpartum haemorrhage following induced labour (induction is a risk for PPH) for hypertension: it might surprise you to know that rates of high blood pressure are very low amongst women cared for by private midwives. A PPH in a woman who had had a caesarean for her third baby – a breech baby: this woman could very easily have proceeded with a vaginal birth, especially given that it was her third baby. Avoidance of the caesarean might have meant no PPH and saved her life. These are the sorts of cases where hospital doesn’t “save” women from death: it might be seen, in some cases to actually cause the death, however the media will never report on this.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

“I’ve been told my baby is big”

and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What are the best positions for labour?

The best positions for labour and birth will be the positions that are the most comfortable for the woman. These are usually also the positions that will assist the baby into a good position to be born.

The positions you decide to use will have an effect on your sense of control and how you experience your labour. Generally, women who are able to move around as they need to, will expefince labour more positively and as being less painful, than women who are confined to the bed.

There are many positions that women will naturally adopt in labour, such as:
- Standing
- Leaning over a bench or couch
- All fours positions
- Kneeling positions
- Walking
- Lying on your side

Because gravity helps the baby’s head to descend deeply into the pelvis, upright positions are generally better for aiding progress in labour while also reducing pain. This is because upright positions work with the body in labour, rather than against it.

Many women choose to birth in the water because the sensation of being in water combined with the lack of gravity makes them feel more mobile and able to position in the best way possible to help the baby move through the pelvis.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Natural Twin Birth

I had a difficult delivery with my first baby, including posterior presentation, premature rupture of membranes, meconium staining, stalled labour, 18 hours of Syntocinon, a largely ineffectual epidural, a 4 hour second stage, and forceps delivery. My daughter had severe respiratory distress and was in the NICU for several days. It was a very tough introduction to parenthood and left me quite traumatised, especially the separation from my daughter. My husband and I decided that we would try for a homebirth if we had another baby, in the hope that a calmer environment would assist the birth process. When I fell pregnant again, we found a lovely homebirth midwife.

I started to show really early. At 8 weeks I was in maternity wear. I thought it was just because it was a second pregnancy, but a 9 week ultrasound showed TWO BABIES. We were completely shocked as there are no twins in my family. Twins of course meant that a homebirth was out of the question.

There followed many long months of argument with various obstetricians about our birth choices. We wanted as little intervention as possible. A standard twin delivery involves syntocinon (which I was very afraid of, after the previous experience), continuous monitoring (which I had hated with my first birth, as I felt chained to the bed) and an epidural prior to the second stage, in case positioning/version or a c-section is necessary to deliver the second twin. In my first birth, the epidural meant I had no pushing urge and seriously compromised my ability to deliver my daughter, hence the very prolonged second stage, so I did not want an epidural this time around, although I was prepared for Synto to be administered between the twins if labour did not re-establish. The hospital also wanted both twins delivered on the bed, which I did not agree with as I had found pushing in that position impossible the first time around. Our views were very challenging to the obstetricians and some were quite aggressive about it, although I must say the head OB was more reasonable and was prepared to admit that my refusal to consent to an epidural would be a “complete contraindication” to giving me one! Throughout this stage our midwife was a pillar of strength and information. She gave us the courage of our convictions and more than once came to the hospital to talk with the obstetricians on our behalf. Even so, the hospital was very unhappy with our birth preferences. It was a stressful time, helped somewhat by a Calmbirth ® course.

In the end all our arguments ended up being moot. At 33 weeks, I started to feel an ominous itching all over. Tests showed elevated bile salts and poor liver function results. I had obstetric cholestasis. Our midwife and the hospital agreed: the babies would need to be delivered by 37 weeks. And I knew that that early, an induction would almost certainly involve Syntocinon.

This was really difficult for me to accept. I was terribly afraid of the drug, and knew that Synto would mean continuous monitoring and therefore limit my movement, which I also feared. However, I knew that my fear would make the delivery more difficult and the pain worse. At this point the hospital dropped the bombshell that despite all their delivery rooms having deep birthing baths, I would not be allowed to use those or the shower if I had to have Synto, as they believe this risks pump damage to the Synto pump. Essentially this meant I was walking into a labour that was likely to be more painful, with less pain relief options. It was going to be down to Calmbirth ® alone, if I wanted to avoid drugs (and I did!).

I did a lot of Calmbirth ® practice from then on. But the Calmbirth ® visualisation exercises presupposed a normal delivery without intervention, and I found it very upsetting to listen to them. I hit on the idea of doing my own visualisations, of a medicalised induction process. After a few of these I was able to work through some of my fears.

On the day of the induction, we kissed our daughter goodbye at 5am and met our midwife at the hospital. Preliminary checks showed a Bishop score of 5, very promising for 36 weeks. The hospital midwife applied prostaglandin gel and sent us out to freedom. We had a lovely breakfast. I started to have sporadic contractions but nothing serious. We returned to the hospital 6 hours later. My cervix had ripened to 2cm, and the very cheerful OB was able to break the waters for twin 1 (our second daughter) at 3.45pm. No meconium staining! I dared to ask the OB how she was presenting. ANTERIOR, WOOHOO! I was very pleased with that.

Contractions came rather more strongly after that point, but were still sporadic. The felt very “knifey”, and our midwife explained this was from the prostaglandin gel. We held off on the Synto as long as possible, but at 6.25pm the drip was put up and contractions started in earnest. Continuous monitoring was in place, but via telemetry so I could have moved. Ironically, though, I didn’t feel the need to. I went deep into calm breathing and spent most of the labour sitting beside the bed on a fit ball, sometimes circling my hips but more often just breathing to ride the contractions with my husband stroking my back. Unlike my first labour, I had no real idea of when the next contraction was coming, and ended up doing my calm breathing (in for 4, out for 6) solidly for hours. I wasn’t afraid of the contractions. I could really feel them doing their work, and little twin 1 moving firm and fast down. I was determined to “get out of the way” of labour and with each contraction focused on opening up and not clenching against the pain. Our midwife was convinced things were going quickly and asked us when we thought we would be having the babies. I told her anything before midnight was a sucker bet! She said 11pm.

At 8.30pm, about 2 hours after I started having regular contractions, the pain was starting to get BIG. The OB did a cervix check – I was 5cm. I was very disheartened by this, but our midwife told me that the first 5cm was the hardest, and the very encouraging OB tried to convince me that it wasn’t all about centimetres and that my cervix felt promisingly thin and stretchy. In hindsight, even in my first labour I dilated from 5 to 10cm in under an hour, so I should have known what was coming – but I didn’t!

Throughout this time I was not making any noise. The hospital’s midwife didn’t seem to think I was in established labour, and threatened to up the Synto dose to make the contractions “strong and regular”, even though they were already sufficient to dilate my cervix 3cm in under 2 hours. I managed to insist “no. more. Synto!” She reserved judgement, but it might have been the adrenaline kick I needed, as by 9.15pm I was having enormous contractions every 2-3 minutes. I could feel them as a giant swelling band of pain stretching around my whole belly and stretching lower. At this point I started vocalising “ah, ah, ah” throughout contractions, to help me ride the pain and stop me clenching down. I remember saying “if this isn’t transition, I’m in trouble!” I didn’t believe it could be transition, though – not so early, not when my first birth had taken almost 3 days. Our midwife said she thought we would have babies by 10pm, and I didn’t believe her.

I needed to get off the fit ball and change position, and asked if I could get on all fours, although the idea of moving seemed impossible to imagine. The hospital midwife set up a crash mat and a nice beanbag for me to lean on. I leaned forward and within one contraction of moving had started making some amazing noises. Unlike my “ah ah ahs” they were completely involuntary. And then I could feel twin 1 crowning. I did not believe it had happened so quickly, and cried out “what’s happening?” Everyone still makes fun of me for this. She was born in only a couple of pushes at 9.25pm, and our midwife had to tell the hospital midwife to put her gloves on to catch her. Our beautiful daughter, with a lovely round head, pink skin and a great big yell! There is a photo of me still on all fours, with a blissed-out grin. I could not believe how easy and quick it had been. I got to hold her straight away, but contractions started up again quite quickly, and she went to her daddy for some skin to skin time.

At this point the obstetricians arrived – a registrar and resident. I wanted to stay on the floor, but the registrar managed to persuade me up on the bed to check twin 2′s position, as we knew he was breech. Contractions started up again within minutes and were really agonising now, as I had lost my Calmbirth focus and as the position (twin 2′s spine to mine) had that sort of posterior feeling to it. But within seconds I was again feeling the inexorable urge to push. The OB flicked twin 2′s feet out as he was in a squatting position, the midwife and OB flexed twin 2′s head by pushing on my stomach and with a few mighty pushes he was out too, at 9.39pm. Our son! He was handed to me but unlike J, had a bit of trouble breathing, and spent some time in the special care nursery. He was back to us almost before we knew it. I must say he had a very breech-looking head, which looked like a mighty frown, but he’s ever so handsome and cheerful now.

J weighed in at 2.98kg (I was really ticked off she could not stretch to the extra 20gm), and P weighed 3.06kg, excellent weights for 36 weekers, let alone twins!

After twin 2 was out, I lost all patience for the pain – rather a pity as the Synto kept getting ramped up to deliver the placentas and then to deal with my uterus which did not want to shrink back down. I ended up with a Synto drip all night. I tell people this birth was meant to help me deal with my fear of Synto once and for all.

Both babies had beautiful breastfeeds within an hour or two of birth, which sadly was not an omen of things to come for twin 1, but it was lovely.


Anyway, that was our birth. Twins born without any pain relief (not even hot water) or really any intervention other than the induction drugs, with 4 hours of contractions total and only about 2 of those active labour. It wasn’t the birth I had wanted but it was a wonderful experience and very healing after my first daughter’s birth. I am so proud of myself, and look back on the birth with amazed gratitude all the time.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Choosing the best care provider for your needs

Choosing the best practitioner for your needs is a very important and personal decision. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong choice: some women will choose a private obstetrician, others will choose a private midwife and others will choose public hospital care. Some women will make an initial choice of care provider and decide to change care providers during the pregnancy. Other women will make one choice in their first pregnancy and then a different choice in a subsequent pregnancy. What’s important is to have an accurate understanding all the options available so that you can feel confident to choose the best option for your needs. The best people to talk to are the people who actually provide the service, rather than a GP who is removed from the actual services of an obstetrician / midwife / public hospital. Get referred to a private obstetrician or two; interview them; reflect on how you feel after meeting them. Go and visit your local public hospital. Have a tour and speak with the midwives there. And interview a couple of eligible midwives. You do not need a GP referral to see an eligible midwife and you can claim their services through medicare. An eligible midwife is a private midwife who has met an additional registration standard that enables them to have a Medicare provider number.

When you are considering a care provider, it’s also necessary to consider where you would like to give birth and to ensure that your care provider can attend you in your chosen setting. You might choose to birth your baby in a public hospital as a public or private patient, in a private hospital as a private patient, in a birth centre or at home. It can be helpful when trying to make a decision to write down a list of questions you may have and also consider what is important to you as you make your choices. For example:

What do I want from my care?
What type of practitioner would I feel most comfortable with?
What do I need from my practitioner to feel comfortable and safe?
Do I want public or private care?
Is continuity of care important to me?

These are questions only you can answer. Other questions are for your care providers to answer with you, and it’s a good idea to interview a few care providers – midwives and obstetricians – before making a choice. Midwives and obstetricians will charge a fee for interviews and you are able to claim this through Medicare (your midwife will need to be eligible in order for you to claim a Medicare benefit). It is important during the interview that you ask all the questions that are on your mind, and to be aware of how you feel throughout the interview. Your care provider should inspire you with confidence, help you to feel at ease and comfortable, and the appointment should feel unhurried.

Likewise, your care provider may like to “interview” you, and this is so that your care provider can be sure that s/he can meet your needs. Maternity care is provided in a partnership and so it’s important that both parties feel really comfortable with the other.

There are many questions you might wish to ask your care provider; the best suggestion is to consider what is important to you and write a list of questions.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Medicare-funded midwifery care: What you need to know

I am an eligible midwife. This means that my private patients can claim some of the cost of private midwifery care, much the same way we do when we see a GP. As well as Medicare benefits, some private health funds will provide benefits for childbirth education with a midwife, and costs may also be claimed through tax as a medical expense (more on that one from your Accountant). Medicare benefits and tax benefits combined are between $2,500 and $3,300. This means that care with an eligible midwife will be up to $3,300 cheaper than care with a non-eligible private midwife.

What is a Medicare-Eligible Midwife?

In order to claim Medicare benefits from care with your midwife, you will need to ensure that your midwife is eligible. An eligible midwife meets certain advanced requirements of a registration standard:

  • Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
  • Midwifery experience that constitutes the equivalent of 3 years full time post initial registration as a midwife;
  • Current competence to provide pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care to women and babies;
  • Successful completion of an approved professional practice review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
  • 40 hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care (20 hours in addition to standard requirements);
  • Pregnancy care:

    45-60 minute consultations in your home or in my clinic

  • Childbirth education
  • Continuity of carer
  • Medicare benefits
  • Obstetric back-up
  • Birth in hospital – or at home

    Continue your care with the same midwife you know and trust, with specialist obstetric back-up readily available

    Postnatal care

  • Consultations in your home and / or my rooms
  • Medicare benefits
  • Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    I’m pregnant and I have private health insurance. What are my options?

    Great question! There are a few options available to you as a private patient, as well as all of the options that are available to public patients. The private options are either a private midwife, or a private obstetrician.

    Private midwife
    To receive care from a private midwife and obtain Medicare benefits, your midwife will need to be an “eligible midwife” (meet an additional registration standard) and work with an obstetrician or a doctor who provides obstetric services. Some private midwives are able to provide labour and birth care in hospital settings, while others are only able to provide labour and birth care at home. All private midwives can provide pregnancy and postnatal care. Hospital options may include private or public hospitals; it’s best to ask your midwife which hospitals she attends births at. Eligible midwives provide complete continuity of care: the midwife you book with will be the same midwife who provides all of your pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Private obstetrician
    Private obstetricians provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care, although birth care would also be provided by hospital midwives who may be unknown to you until birth. Private obstetricians deliver babies at public and private hospitals. Continuity is provided during the pregnancy, but birth care is mostly provided by hospital midwives. Postnatal care is almost always provided by hospital midwives, with your obstetrician visiting you each day in hospital and at 6 weeks.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    First-time mums learn the hard way: informed mums choose private midwives

    A recent article has suggested that first-time mums have overly unrealistic ideas about their birth – that it will be a natural, uncomplicated birth, when in reality it is not, for the majority. We know that women choosing care through the general hospital system will experience high rates of interventions, leading ultimately to a caesarean. But few women know that if they engage a private midwife for a hospital or homebirth, they will experience much lower rates of intervention, but with the same level of safety. Care with an eligible private midwife will attract medicare benefits, and obstetric care is readily available if it is needed. The article below described one woman’s experience of general hospital care. I can only assume that this reporter has written the article in response to the outcry about the original research.

    HERVEY Bay first-time mum Jasmine Adame has experienced first-hand just how difficult childbirth can be.

    And she agrees with new research … that suggests that many first-time mums are unprepared for the realities of a complicated labour.

    Jasmine delivered her little girl … at Hervey Bay Hospital after spending a day and a half in labour.

    In the end, she was told her labour had stalled and she had to have an emergency caesarean.

    We are not told how long labour stalled for, whether she had her own midwife with her throughout her labour (unlikely since this is not available to most women through the general hospital system) and we are also not told how far through her labour she was. It is true that some caesareans are performed for “failure to progress” when the woman’s cervix is less than 3 centimeters dilated, indicating that she is not yet in established labour.

    Jasmine had attended antenatal classes prior to having her first child and said it was the midwives who held these classes who gave her the best idea of what labour was actually going to be like.

    Hospital classes are great at telling women about hospital policies, but independent childbirth education will inspire women with confidence about what their bodies are capable of, with the right support.

    “I knew it wasn’t going to be fun.

    “But I didn’t expect it to be as horrid as it was,” she said.

    It sounds like she didn’t have the care of a midwife who was known and trusted. Most women I work with will experience their labour extremely positively, as if it was the best (hardest and most challenging, but oh so rewarding) experience of their life.

    … The chances of having a medically uncomplicated birth were actually 21%.

    This applies to women birthing in the general hospital system, where they will not be cared for by one midwife who is known to them, chosen by them and trusted by them. The chance of a medically uncomplicated birth when a woman chooses private midwifery care is around 70% – 80%. This is a huge difference.

    Because she had been focused on a natural delivery, the decision to deliver the baby by caesarean took Jasmine by surprise – and the time between the decision and the birth was very swift, allowing her little time to adjust …

    This is addressed during care with a private midwife, where there is ample time to explore all options and possibilities, so that there are few surprises on the day (or night!). Hour-long appointments allow plenty of time for questions and education. The possibility of a first-time mum “needing” a caesarean in the general hospital system is 25%, or one in four. Given this large minority, we would think that all women going through the hospital system would be thoroughly appraised of this possibility. In my private practice, a mere 3% first-time mums need a caesarean. This is not because we push the boundaries of safety: it is because women who are well supported, well-informed, relaxed and confident about their birth will generally start labour on their own at term, labour normally and birth their babies unassisted by any instruments or operations.

    Hopefully Jasmine will choose private midwifery care with her next pregnancy (private midwifery care is available for a planned hospital birth), where she can expect an 80% – 90% chance of a vaginal birth following her caesarean in her first pregnancy. Or will she choose to go back to the general hospital system, where she has a mere 15% chance of a vaginal birth?

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage

    Link

    No previous study has focused on true physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Physiological third stage is often chosen by women who birth at home or in a birth centre, however hospital policies urge active management of the third stage (injection of syntocinon, immediate clamping and cutting of the cord and then pulling the placenta out) because studies have shown that this form of management reduces bleeding. However, it is unfortunate that those studies have either a) not clearly defined physiological management or b) have not managed the “physiological” third stages in a physiological manner. Hence, those studies have shown that active management is the safer option and hospitals have gone with those recommendations.

    This study clearly defines what is meant by physiological management and also the women who are suitable for physiological management. Some women are at a higher risk of PPH and so active management was recommended to those women in the study.

    The study compared active management which was standard at the tertiary hospital, with physiological management which was the norm at the free-standing birth centre. At the tertiary unit, 11.2% low-risk women experienced a PPH. At the midwifery-led unit, where physiological management was practiced, PPH only occurred in 2.8% women. Active management was associated with 11.5% PPHs compared with physiological management which was 1.7% PPHs. Active management was associated with a seven to eight fold increase in PPH for low-risk women.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Delivering better maternity care

    Link

    Despite countless inquiries, initiatives and ministerial pledges … maternity care remains one of the NHS’s problem areas …

    In recent weeks there have been two significant pieces of evidence published that will help shape practice affecting the UK’s 800,000 births a year. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced new guidelines for the NHS in England and Wales on the circumstances in which mothers-to-be should be able to have a Caesarean-section delivery.

    Meanwhile the landmark Birthplace study … sought to clarify the relative risks of having a baby at home, in hospital or in a birth centre run by midwives; the study found all settings carried a low level of risk. Both documents aim to advise maternity teams on how to give mothers and their babies the best possible experience.

    … It is no wonder maternity services are under pressure … England has had a 22% increase in births over the past decade …

    But the maternity workforce is not just short of midwives, the roundtable heard. Of those 800,000 annual births, 94% of them take place in hospitals where doctors are present along with midwives; the others, at home (2%) and in birth centres (4%), have midwives solely in charge. But the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) believes the 2,186 senior doctors working as consultants in that area of medicine is too few. It wants the NHS to boost numbers to 3,000-3,300.

    Mothers-to-be would benefit because every hospital maternity unit would have a consultant on hand 24/7 and less experienced doctors would no longer be in charge overnight and at weekends …

    … “the current system of maternity care is unsustainable. You have to reconfigure”. The participant meant that some maternity units should be closed – merged, in effect – so fewer, larger childbirth centres could offer mothers a better service, partly thanks to more specialist staff handling a greater number of deliveries concentrated in the same place.

    It makes little sense for large urban areas to have separate maternity units just a few miles apart, a view confirmed for the speaker by seeing that sort of setup on a recent visit to Leeds and nearby towns.

    Many health professionals support the concept of reorganisation. And the reconfiguration of neonatal care services in 2003, which led to fewer units dealing with sick babies but offering enhanced care, is a potential model to follow, another participant added. But there is a major obstacle to overcome first: … To close your core maternity service is a death trap as an MP. So that will not happen,” …

    … simply creating fewer, but larger, hospital units is not the answer and there needs to be more midwife-led birth centres, either standalone units or situated beside hospitals, in case a mother needs urgent medical attention …

    There was also a strong consensus that the huge proportion of births occurring in hospitals, 94%, is too high. While there was support for moving towards an equal split – 33% at home, 33% in birth centres and 33% in hospital – there was also a recognition that politics, entrenched attitudes and the tightest NHS budget in a generation means that will probably remain just an aspiration for the foreseeable future.

    … In 2007, Maternity Matters promised women in England a choice of birth place, but the reality is that many still do not get that. One participant working on the NHS frontline said pressure on maternity services was so great in some places that midwives who usually help women to have home births are having to work, instead, on labour wards, thus depriving those seeking a home birth of that supposedly guaranteed right.

    Similarly, surveys by the Healthcare Commission and its successor as the NHS regulator for England, the Care Quality Commission, have shown the promise to women of one-to-one care from a midwife during their labour is also not honoured for as many as a quarter of mothers-to-be, who are left alone and find it stressful …

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Couple threaten legal action to ensure homebirth service; hospital engages private midwives for homebirth service

    Link

    Bosses at Whipps Cross University Hospital have decided to reinstate its home births service after a couple threatened legal action.

    The cash-strapped hospital in Leytonstone announced earlier this month that it would be impossible to provide midwives to households from December 18 for up to six weeks due to staff shortages.

    But now … extra funding has been made available to pay for an independent midwife service for those who were hit by the sudden suspension.

    Adam and Michelle Boult … were planning to have a home birth in January and were so outraged by the hospital’s plan to stop the service they called in a barrister, who argued the hospital had a legal responsibility to support them.

    Mr Boult, a 32-year-old journalist, said: “While they would probably deny it, to get them to agree to this has taken an extraordinary amount of pressure.

    “We were lucky enough to have a very helpful barrister and solicitor who have pushed for the Trust to reconsider its stance, culminating in Whipps Cross receiving a pre-action letter suggesting a judicial review”.

    … In a joint statement, Whipps Cross and ONEL said: “[We] are committed to offering all women in the local area the best possible choice of how and where they give birth.

    “We have been working together to find a way to offer a home birth service during the next four weeks. Safety is our priority, and we did have some concerns about staffing levels over this period.

    “However, by working together, the hospital and NHS ONEL are now able to bring in independent midwives for this limited period, until the hospital’s Home Birth Service team is in place.

    “This means those women who asked for a home birth in the next four weeks can have one. We have always been committed to developing the Home Birth Service and to ensuring we provide high quality, safe and consistent services to all women.”

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Myths and Truths of Obesity and Pregnancy

    Link

    Ironically, despite excessive caloric intake, many obese women are deficient in vitamins vital to a healthy pregnancy …

    … Many obese women are vitamin deficient …

    Forty percent are deficient in iron, 24 percent in folic acid and 4 percent in B12. This is a concern because certain vitamins, like folic acid, are very important before conception, lowering the risk of cardiac problems and spinal defects in newborns. Other vitamins, such as calcium and iron, are needed throughout pregnancy to help babies grow.

    … vitamin deficiency has to do with the quality of the diet, not the quantity. Obese women tend to stray away from fortified cereals, fruits and vegetables, and eat more processed foods that are high in calories but low in nutritional value.

    “Just like everybody else, women considering pregnancy or currently pregnant should get a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, lean proteins and good quality carbohydrates. Unfortunately, these are not the foods people lean towards when they overeat,” noted Thornburg. “Women also need to be sure they are taking vitamins containing folic acid before and during pregnancy.”

    … In 2009, the Institute of Medicine revised its recommendations for gestational weight gain for obese women from “at least 15 pounds” to “11-20 pounds.” According to past research, obese women with excessive weight gain during pregnancy have a very high risk of complications, including indicated preterm birth, cesarean delivery, failed labor induction, large-for-gestational-age infants and infants with low blood sugar.

    If a woman starts her pregnancy overweight or obese, not gaining a lot of weight can actually improve the likelihood of a healthy pregnancy …

    … Obese women have increased rates of respiratory complications, and up to 30 percent experience an exacerbation of their asthma during pregnancy, a risk almost one-and-a-half times more than non-obese women.

    … Breastfeeding rates are poor among obese women, with only 80 percent initiating and less than 50 percent continuing beyond six months, even though it is associated with less postpartum weight retention and should be encouraged as it benefits the health of mom and baby.

    … it can be challenging for obese women to breast feed. It often takes longer for their milk to come in and they can have lower production …

    Preconception care and a healthy eating and exercise program before pregnancy, that is maintained during pregnancy, can be helpful.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    I’m pregnant! What are my next steps?

    If you have just found out you are pregnant, congratulations! You might be feeling a range of emotions: excited, fearful, overwhelmed, happy, anxious … this is all very normal! Many women who contact me feel unsure about what to do next and are anxious to know all their options before making a choice, so I have put together a few tips to make you feel a little more confident.

    Although many women see their GP as their first port of call when they are pregnant, it’s handy to know that women may also see an eligible midwife who can order all the necessary pregnancy tests and any scans that are needed. An eligible midwife can also talk with you about the available options for your pregnancy and birth care, in a relaxed and unhurried setting. An eligible midwife can help you determine your due date and arrange any referrals that you may need. She can book you into a hospital, refer you to an obstetrician if needed, and also provide full pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    How do Midwives Work?

    It’s a common question I am asked! When people ask me what I do, I tell them I am a midwife. The next question is usually, “Oh, so you’re a nurse?”. “Not quite”, I reply, “a midwife – I care for women though pregnancy and birth and with their new baby.” Then they really look puzzled. “That’s not what an obstetrician does?” “An obstetrician is a doctor who specialises in caring for women with complicated pregnancies and births. A midwife specialises in caring for women who are having healthy pregnancies and births.” By that stage they’re well and truly confused and I start to wonder what we need to do to promote midwifery as a care option for all women.

    The term midwife means ‘with woman’. Midwives work in partnership with women through pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. Midwives can provide care to women from the time that the woman discovers she is pregnant, right up until her baby is 6 weeks old. In fact, women who experience a normal, healthy pregnancy and birth may not see a doctor at all! Eligible midwives are able to order all the necessary tests and scans during pregnancy and may refer directly to an obstetrician if their services are necessary.

    Midwives provide education, support, advice and information, as well as doing all the routine checks of mother and baby.

    Midwives advocate measures throughout pregnancy and birth that promote normal birth: that is a birth without interventions. Midwives and are experienced in such things as water birth, active birth, and so on.

    Midwives are also specially educated to know if anything is out of the ordinary, and they can get help from obstetricians. In pregnancy, midwives see women at intervals so that any issues that may present can be dealt with before they cause any major issues.

    Women who are cared for by one midwife from pregnancy through to birth have better outcomes in terms of safety, lower rates of intervention and satisfaction with their experience. Midwives too prefer to work in this way, getting to know each family individually.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Midwives Use Rituals To Send Message That Women’s Bodies Know Best

    Link

    In reaction to what midwives view as the overly medicalized way hospitals deliver babies, they have created birthing rituals to send the message that women’s bodies know best.

    The midwife experience uses these rituals to send the message that home birth is about female empowerment, strengthening relationships between family and friends, and facilitating participatory experiences that put mothers in control, with the ultimate goal of safe and healthy deliveries less focused on technological intervention.

    These are some of the findings from an Oregon State University researcher and licensed midwife who witnessed more than 400 home births in order to document an extensive list of practices utilized by midwives to express the symbolic difference between home and hospital births.

    … “We know, for instance, that midwives have better health outcomes in some areas, such as reduced rates of surgical delivery and labor induction, than hospitals. But I wanted to examine how ritual might play a part in producing these positive health outcomes.”

    … evidence shows that hospital births result in about triple the rate of cesarean section for low-risk women compared to midwife-attended home births …

    What she found was a network of common practices, messages and beliefs that resulted in midwives constructing woman-centered rituals around pregnancy and birth that were set up in opposition to what they believe are the overly medicalized practices of hospitals.

    For instance … midwives conducted many of the same diagnostic procedures as a physician would prenatally, from blood pressure and weight checks to blood testing and fetal heart tone evaluation …

    … “Many midwives also downplayed the centrality of monitoring and resuscitation equipment setting them off to the side, or placing them under baby blankets during labor so women would not be reminded of the technology in the room. Mothers and babies were still monitored closely, but the monitoring was not made the central focus.”

    The differences aren’t so much in practice … but in performance.

    Cheyney also documented the use of common phrases to create birthing mantras. She lists phrases such as “don’t fight it,” “let your body do it,” “open,” and “let it be strong,” as key components … Many mothers … reported feeling strong and capable during their labors, and women who compared their hospital birth to their home birth reported feeling like they were “doing something, rather than just lying there passively waiting.” Midwives also commonly expressed the statement that they were simply “guardians,” and that women have all the tools inside of them to birth their own babies.

    … It is Cheyney’s belief that both of these sets of rituals have caused a wide chasm between … hospital births and the 1 percent who choose home births.

    “Just as women and their doctors who deliver in the hospital often feel convinced that their birth was the only safe and ‘correct’ way, women and midwives who deliver at home feel strongly that they have the solution,” … “They believe it with every cell in their body because they have lived it.”…

    There is definitely something special and unique about homebirth that cannot be summarised in words alone.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Unneeded cesareans are risky and expensive

    Link

    Cesarean deliveries are over-used … and reducing the number of surgical births would save health-care dollars and protect women’s health. Those are the conclusions of a new white paper issued today by the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative.

    … in the last 15 years, the rate of surgical birth has increased from 22 to 32 percent of California deliveries with no measurable benefits for new mothers or their babies.

    This is a concern because cesareans aren’t risk-free. After surgical delivery, women experience more pain, infection and hemorrhage than women who give birth vaginally. Women who have had a prior cesarean also have more problems with subsequent pregnancies. The placenta can become deeply implanted in scar tissue from the old incision, causing hemorrhage at the second delivery …

    The white paper, which was funded by the California HealthCare Foundation, uncovered striking evidence for over-use of cesarean: Among low-risk women having their first baby, the rate of the surgery varies from nine percent to 51 percent of births based on the mother’s geographic location within California. As a press release about the paper says:

    This large variation among California regions and hospitals cannot be explained by medical factors alone and therefore suggests that labor management practices and local attitudes help drive the use of cesareans during labor.

    Reasons for the increase also include: physicians’ concerns about medical liability and avoidance of risk, as well as specific labor practices such as the increased reliance on labor induction, early labor admission, lack of patience in labor, and the virtual disappearance of vaginal birth after a prior cesarean …

    “Over the last 15 years, cesarean deliveries have become so common that in some hospitals and communities they are considered ‘normal births’ despite the increased risks,” …

    The white paper makes several recommendations for how to reduce unnecessary cesareans, including removing perverse financial incentives … encouraging VBACs … improving public education about the risks of cesarean delivery, and implementing statewide quality-improvement activities for better labor practices.

    Unfortunately, there is no mention of the role of the midwife in preventing the first caesarean, or in helping a VBAC woman have a successful VBAC.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Hospital births for healthy women? What does the research say?

    The recent Birthplace Study was the first of its kind to compare outcomes for low-risk, healthy women who gave birth in midwife-led units (both alongside and freestanding), obstetric units and at home. My previous blog post described the findings for first-time Mums birthing at home, but what did the findings say about hospital birth?

    The study is extremely positive and shows that birth is generally very safe for mothers and babies who are low risk and healthy. In fact, the chance of something going very wrong for the baby was so low that the researchers had to combine mortality and morbidity to get any meaningful data. There were so few deaths in the study (38 out of nearly 65,000 births) that they had to combine a host of adverse outcomes in order to come up with any statistically significant results. Therefore the “primary outcome” included baby deaths and serious morbidity (injury / illness) to the baby. Overall, a low risk woman had a 4.3/1,000 risk of having a “primary outcome” (that is, death or serious injury to the baby). For women birthing in hospital, the figure was 4.4/1,000 and was actually lower for babies born at home and in midwifery-led units. Imagine that: the risk to the baby overall was highest in hospital!

    Breaking this down further, if we look at first-time Mums separately to second and subsequent time Mums, the figures look different. First time Mums had a 5.3/1,000 chance of a “primary outcome” overall. This rose to 9.3/1,000 for women who planned to birth at home, and fell to 4.5 for women birthing in a midwifery-led unit. It was 5.3/1,000 for first-time mums who birthed in hospital. Again, we see that hospital birth confers some increased risk for first time Mums.

    Now looking at women birthing for the second (or subsequent) time, we find that the overall risk of a “primary outcome” was very low: 3.1/1,000. This was higher in an obstetric (hospital) unit at 3.3/1,000, lower in a midwifery-led unit (2.7/1,000) and lowest for women birthing at home (2.3/1,000). So once again, the study is showing that hospital is not the safest place to birth a baby if you are a low-risk, healthy women.

    If you are having your first baby and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is in a midwifery unit, and if you have birthed before and are low-risk, the safest place to birth is at home.

    Of course, midwifery units have limited capabilities to provide higher levels of care, and as labour and birth are unpredictable, there needs to be robust transfer arrangements in place. Some 10-45% of women transfer in birth. This figure is lowest for women who have birthed before, and highest in first-time Mums. As well as robust transfer arrangements, women – particularly first-time Mums – need to be aware of the chance of transfer and to be comfortable with this possibility. This is best accommodated if the woman can transfer in with her own midwife.

    What were the intervention rates like?

    Not surprisingly, intervention rates were highest in women who planned a hospital birth. 93% women who planned a homebirth had a normal birth, versus only 74% women in the hospital. 11% had a caesarean in the obstetric (hospital) unit, versus a mere 2.8% in women who planned a home birth. 24% women had their labours sped up with a syntocinon drip in the planned hospital birth group, versus only 5% in the women who planned a homebirth. 31% women had an epidural in the planned hospital birth group, versus 8% at home. And of course, episiotomy rates were lowest at home.

    It is clear that being in hospital greatly increases risks for all low risk mothers compared to being at home or in a midwife led unit (either alongside or freestanding).

    It is clear that low-risk women have much to gain by planning a birth with midwives in a birth centre or some other form of midwifery-led care. Planned homebirth does increase the risks to the babies of first-time Mums, with an increase in adverse outcomes for babies from about 0.5% to just under 1%. But what is it about planning a homebirth that increases the risk to the baby? The study used intention to treat analysis, so we are not able to know how many of those adverse outcomes occurred in those who transferred to hospital after a planned homebirth, versus those that happened in the births that actually occurred at home. We do know that the outcomes of homebirth transfers are generally worse than those who had been planned to occur in hospital, and first-time Mums are more likely to transfer. We also know that birth is generally riskier for a first-time Mum than a woman who has birthed before.

    Regardless, the study is extremely positive in supporting the role of primary midwifery care and the excellent outcomes that low-risk women can achieve when they choose a midwife as their care provider. Imagine the benefits as well for high-risk women who receive midwifery care with appropriate and timely obstetric care.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Expecting mothers prefer midwife-led labour

    Link

    Most women should be offered midwife-led care that uses fewer interventions and is just as safe as the consultant-led model, a major study recommends.

    The study, commissioned by the Health Service Executive and conducted by the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Trinity College Dublin, found most women prefer midwife-led units.

    It also discovered the number of babies requiring resuscitation at birth or admission to the special care baby unit was the same for both groups of women.

    Almost six in 10 women in the consultant-led units (57%) had their labours speeded up by either having their waters broken or having oxytocin given intravenously by a drip, compared to only four in 10 women in the midwife-led units.

    The study involved 1,653 women who had babies in the HSE Dublin North-East region from 2004 to 2007 and compared the consultant-led maternity care with a new model of care provided in two integrated midwifery-led units in Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda and Cavan General Hospital.

    The two midwife-led units, which have hotel-like private rooms with birthing pools, were opened in response to recommendations made in the Minder Report in 2001 to provide more choice in maternity care in the north-east.

    … fewer women in the midwifery-led unit group chose pain-relieving epidurals in labour.

    Despite having fewer epidurals, 83% of women in the midwife-led units were satisfied with their pain relief compared with 68% of women in the consultant-led unit.

    “When women are supported by one-to-one midwifery care, are encouraged to labour gently at their own pace and have the pain-relieving benefits of relaxing in warm water, they are far better able to tolerate pain and labour more effectively,” …

    The study found that 85% of women attending the midwife-led unit would recommend the care they had received to a friend, compared to 70% having the usual care.

    Although facilities in the midwifery-led units were quite luxurious, the cost of care for each women was €332.80 less than in the usual hospital system.

    A recent KPMG report on maternity care in the greater Dublin region also recommended the introduction of midwifery-led units throughout the country.

    These results have been found in other studies, particularly the claim around pain relief. It is interesting that epidurals don’t equate with a more positive birth experience; rather, a woman who feels well-prepared and who is supported with one-to-one midwifery care in a drug-free birth, will rate her birth as being highly satisfying.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Midwifery as a self-regulating profession?

    There is some debate about private midwifery, in particular the desirability – or even the need for – insurance and regulation. It is an interesting debate to follow. One side argues for no Medicare funding – we never had it anyway, no insurance – we haven’t had that for a few years, and no regulation. I would ask – if there was no regulation – are we indeed a profession? Does it matter?

    A friend sent me an article recently that has fascinated me: “Why is UK medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving “bad apple” doctors.”

    It was a very interesting article to read. The article identifies the role played by a series of medical scandals in the UK that basically ended the model of self-regulation of the medical profession that had been in place for 150 years. The original motive for professional self-regulation was “to resolve the principal-agent problem inherent in the doctor-patient relationship. The profession, in return for its self-regulating privileges, undertook to act as a reliable guarantor for the competence and conduct of each of its members”.

    This is perhaps what is lacking in midwifery, and perhaps why we are seeing a huge amount of regulation at the moment. Midwifery has never really had a process of self-regulation. Midwives have not held each other to account for preventable outcomes. The collegial model adopted by the medical profession “left it fatally vulnerable to the problem of “bad apples”: those unwilling, incapable or indifferent to delivering on their professional commitments and who betrayed the trust of both patients and peers”. I wonder if this is what we are seeing in midwifery?

    In the UK, it was the convergence of social and political conditions and public anger and shifts in social attitudes that presented an opportunity for imposing standards for accountability. Private midwifery has, until recently, been untouched. I remember leaving hospital employment to move to private practice and being amazed by the lack of processes, accountability, systems, structure … hospitals are full of these things but they were lacking in private practice. If I did these things, it was up to me. If not, it was no problem. I set up many processes and systems and dedicated a lot of resources to ensure that these were robust, practical and worthwhile. I have found he process of eligibility and meeting the requirements of the Quality and Safety Framework to be relatively ok because I already had much of this in place.

    However, to those who argue against the need for increased accountability, insurance, regulation – professionalism – that is thrust upon us, I would venture to say that those attitudes are the precise reason why we have been thrust into the position of such intense regulation and accountability. If we did not have these, would we be members of the profession that is midwifery? For those who could care less about professionalism, I would ask why they completed their degree and applied for registration. Anyone can be with a woman in pregnancy and birth, but the title and practice of midwifery is one that we should hold dear and be proud of: it is one that is made stronger by regulation and accountability and one that gives the public an assurance of a certain standard of care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    How is a hospital midwife different to a private midwife?

    This is a question I’m asked quite frequently so I’d like to take this opportunity to explain the difference.

    Hospital midwives are employed by a hospital, either public or private. The majority of hospital midwives work shifts and there are generally 3 shifts in a day, so that each woman will go through 3 different midwives each day, in the provision of her care. Many hospital midwives do not work across the full scope of midwifery practice; instead, they work in one area only, such as postnatal. Because of this, it is unlikely that women would be afforded the opportunity to meet with the midwives who’ll be providing their care in labour and after their baby is born, first because the midwives work in shifts and it’s impossible to know who’ll be rostered on on the big day, and second because the midwives in postnatal, for example, would not work in the antenatal clinics which is where women go for their pregnancy care. The other implication is that antenatal midwives – who do not work with breastfeeding mothers – are not best placed to provide breastfeeding preparation and advice in pregnancy; likewise, delivery suite midwives would also not be best placed to advise about early pregnancy tests.

    Another important factor is that hospital-employed midwives are bound by hospital policies. It’s a condition of employment. So that when something props up and the woman wants impartial information or alternative suggestions to explore, the hospital-employed midwife is not able to provide this.

    Private midwives run their own business and are self-employed. They book their own clients and arrange their work life and hours to meet the needs of their clients. They follow their clients through from pregnancy, birth and afterwards with their new baby, generally for 6 weeks. Private midwives do not work in shifts; we are on call 24/7 for the families in our care. This means that the same midwife is accessible at all times, either by phone or in person.

    Families choose their private midwife, whereas there’s no option to choose hospital midwives: you have whoever is rostered on when you’re there. Choice is an important factor of maternity care, and is a driving factor in the success of private obstetric practices where women can interview several obstetricians before choosing the one that best meets their needs.

    Private midwives are not bound by hospital policies. We do follow the guidelines of our professional bodies such as the Australian College of Midwives, as well as researched and widely-accepted clinical practice guidelines, as well as legal requirements, but when it comes to exploring all options, private midwifery is the way to go. A common example might be a breech baby. Hospital policy may be to offer to turn the baby manually (ECV) so that it is head down. If this is not successful, caesarean will be encouraged. These options are also given by private midwives, as well as the natural alternatives to turning breech babies, and if the baby decides to remain breech, there is the option of vaginal breech birth and the woman will be able to approach this knowing that she has a skilled professional by her side, on her side.

    Women will generally approach private midwives for the one-to-one flexible care that we provide; they want to get to know the midwife who’ll be there on the special day (or night) when their new family member arrives. It’s only natural to want to know that person who’ll be with you during the most life-changing, amazing and special moments of your life.

    Generally, satisfaction with private midwifery care is very high, whether the woman birthed at home or in hospital.

    Women are generally very satisfied with their care because they have far more control over what does and does not happen to them. Women have greater access to resources that helps them to feel confident with their abilities to birth naturally and fully aware of all options so that they can choose the best one for their needs.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Decision-making: Heart and Head

    Through my practice, I have a lot of women coming to me who are experiencing conflict with regards to the choices they have made for their pregnancy and birth. Typically, they find (sometimes quite late in their pregnancy) that perhaps the choice they made right back at the start of their pregnancy, no longer works for the, or the choice that they made was perhaps not as well informed as they thought it was. Some women find it hard to take the attitude of interviewing potential care providers before pregnancy (or very early in pregnancy) and then choosing the midwife or obstetrician who is best able to meet their needs. The end result can often be a woman who chooses an obstetrician with the goal of a natural birth, only to discover that their doctor will only “deliver” their baby if they’re on their back in bed with an epidural in place. Or that induction is performed by 40 weeks, or that all women have their waters broken and all first time Mums have an episiotomy or so on. And sometimes, the more reading a woman does, the more she realises that this is not what she wants.

    I often ask the question, “What was it that made you decide on this particular care provider?”

    And the responses are generally very interesting.

    • My GP referred me
    • My mother / sister / friend / neighbour used this midwife and she said she’s wonderful
    • Well, when I got pregnant I went to my GP. She asked me if I have private health insurance and I said yes, so she wrote a referral to Dr XX.

    I ask these women if they considered any other options. “What options?” comes the response.

    I’m amazed that with the marvels of modern technology, internet etc, women don’t know they have other options. We have options with all sorts of things in life, and we don’t shy away from discovering them either! It seems to be to be an interesting handing-over of responsibility when it comes to pregnancy and birth, and I’m curious why it happens with pregnancy and birth, but not in other aspects of life. Do we buy a particular computer – that can’t meet our needs – because it was recommended and we didn’t know there were other computers on the market? Do we buy a large house when we need a small house because it was recommended by the real estate agent?

    In most other situations where choices are involved, people will engage in a process of assessing options.

    We might list all the possible options and then assess each option across a range of qualities.

    We ask questions.

    We consider what it is that we really want, and then match it to what’s available, seeking the most compatible choice.

    But sadly, this does not happen with pregnancy and birth. Perhaps it should?

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Natural birth in hospital?

    Here are some ideas to birth naturally in hospital:

    Read, read, read. Books, websites, any written info from your care provider … read it all. You also need to know the difference between facts presented to you in an honest and unbiased way, and facts that are being filtered through hospital policy. This is where women benefit from having a private midwife by their side.

    For example, “Some risks rise slightly when a woman has high blood pressure. I am uncomfortable with letting your pregnancy continue with high blood pressure because of the risks to the baby and to you if something happens” is an honest and factual statement. You have the right to accept the risks and refuse induction. However, some women hear “I’m going to induce you today because if we don’t do this now, there is a good chance your baby will not make it”. This statement is dishonest, using a woman’s fears and her maternal instinct to encourage her to accept intervention. There is also no discussion of alternative options. Informed consent requires that women are presented with options so that they can make the best decision for them, in their situation.

    Be assertive As with most human relationships, a great deal can be resolved with a calm, respectful and firm manner. Know what you want and why you want it. Engage a private midwife to assist you with obtaining relevant and impartial information.

    Listen. If you are choosing to use a hospital and an obstetrician for your birth, then you acknowledge that their presence, education and experience have some value. Your wishes are important but be willing to listen even when what’s being said is really not what you want to hear. You must also acknowledge that an obstetrician is trained in all things that go wrong, and they are on the look-out for any sign of things going wrong. Midwives, on the other hand, will promote normalcy and assist your pregnancy and birth to remain normal. These differing philosophies do result in big differences in intervention rates.

    Be Flexible. Understand that sometimes things don’t go the way we had planned. There might be some occasions where you’ll be happy to accommodate the hospital policy, and other times when you’ll want to stand your ground.

    Ultimately, it is true that the most important aspect of birth is safety and a healthy mother and baby. But that doesn’t mean the other aspects are unimportant, and I firmly believe you can have a great birth – and a safe birth – in any location.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Push to get new babies home in four hours

    Link

    HOSPITAL to home in four hours? It would have been unheard of a generation ago when new mothers regularly spent up to two weeks in hospital, ”lying in” post-birth.

    But in the NSW maternity wards of the future, it won’t be unusual for women to give birth in the morning and go home in time for lunch.

    Early hospital discharge for women with low-risk pregnancies, uncomplicated vaginal births, a healthy baby and good support at home, is part of NSW Health’s Towards Normal Birth directive, to be implemented by 2015.

    Women who opt to go home early would be visited by a midwife for up to two weeks after the birth …

    … there was no reason why more women could not leave hospital soon after giving birth, particularly when they were under the care of the same midwife throughout.

    … if women could be well cared for at home, it would alleviate pressure on maternity staff.

    … ”I don’t really like hospitals and my feeling is that if you’re not sick there is no need to be in one,” she said. ”I wanted to go home as early as possible if I was healthy and the baby was healthy. I would rather be in my own home, in my own bed.”

    … NSW president of the Australian Breastfeeding Association, had concerns about early discharge programs. She said the state was over-represented in calls to the association’s helpline, which she suspected was due to women leaving hospital before feeding was well established …

    Early discharge hospital programs typically delivery one to three home visits per woman. Although the woman may be under the care of the hospital for up to two weeks, on some of those days, the woman will be called instead of visited and on other days, there is no phone call or a visit, but the woman is always able to call in if she has any issues and a midwife is always available for help over the phone. Private midwives provide a wide ranging schedule of postnatal visits, ranging from one or two visits only, to as many as 12 postnatal visits over a 6-week period. Most private midwives will provide postnatal are for 6 weeks. It is best to ask your private midwife for her schedule of postnatal visiting before you engage her services and to always ask if you feel that you would like more visits.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Choosing Your Midwife

    Midwives are qualified and educated to care for women throughout normal pregnancy, birth and the postnatal / newborn period. Midwives are also known as the experts in natural birth, attending water births, home births and hospital births. Finding the best midwife for your needs can be a challenging task, but it’s one of the most important decisions a family will make when they decide to work with a midwife. The midwife’s knowledge, skill and experience are key to a safe and satisfying pregnancy and birth experience.

    When engaging the services of a private midwife, most people will make contact by phone call or email, and then arrange for an initial consultation. At the consultation, the midwife and family interview each other to explore whether the relationship feels right for them and meets their needs. Midwives will ask about the woman’s health history, her care needs, her previous birth experiences, her attitudes and beliefs about birth and her expectations of her midwife.

    What sorts of questions can women ask their midwife? Well, there are lots of questions you could ask and I’ve included some below.

    Be sure to ask about qualifications and experience, including whether your midwife is an eligible midwife. You are able to claim medicare benefits if your eligible midwife has a collaborative arrangement and is able to access obstetric care for you if it becomes necessary. If you are told, “I have three years of experience” ask where that experience was obtained – in a hospital? Private practice? If in private practice, how many births does she attend a year? 2? 20? Generally for private practice, the more experience that is gained, the better: when a midwife works in private practice, she works alone and needs a good level of skill, experience and judgment to practice safely. Experience is always the best teacher.

    Ask your midwife about her relationships with hospitals and doctors. This will provide insight into your midwife’s ability to negotiate and communicate.

    Many women ask for references but this can be tricky as they would come from former clients of your midwife. This of course brings up issues of confidentiality, and it is against the Public Health Act for midwives to place testimonials on their websites. You can ask your midwife if she has any former clients who would be prepared to speak with you, but be mindful of confidentiality processes and women’s rights to privacy. What your midwife can do, is to provide a summary of the feedback that she has received from her clients. This will tell you that your midwife is engaged in quality assurance processes and would also provide a way of reading feedback from previous clients.

    Ask your midwife what her service includes and does not include. Also ask about fees, back-up arrangements and obstetric back-up arrangements.

    Are there any questions families should not ask their midwife? Generally, interviews with midwives can be approached as a job interview. Questions that are appropriate in a job interview would be fine to ask your prospective midwife. Questions regarding religion, marital status, age, previous birth experiences, previous terminations and other personal questions ought not be asked.

    Finally, it’s really important that you feel comfortable with your midwife and that you feel that you trust her. Reliability is important, as is trust, respect and honesty.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Charging women for non-medical caesareans?

    Link

    The health minister has said that women in Northern Ireland who choose to have a Caesarean for non-medical reasons may have to pay for the operation.

    Edwin Poots is launching a consultation on a review of maternity services.

    Women at low risk will be encouraged to consider having their baby in a midwife-led unit or at home, if appropriate.

    Around 30% of deliveries are by Caesarean section – the highest level in the UK and Ireland.

    … giving birth was a natural process and superb assistance was available to help women through the delivery.

    “It costs several thousand pounds more for a Caesarean section so there are savings to be made,” …

    “… what we want to encourage, is more people to give birth naturally because it has better outcomes for the mother and the baby.

    … “We want to ensure that people take the natural choice where they can and to have that back up where they need Caesarean section to take place.”

    … At present, women who elect to go private to have a Caesarean on non-medical grounds pay for their pre and post-natal care.

    But the cost of the delivery is met by the health service.

    … women will be encouraged to have their baby in a midwife led unit

    “If you want to go down that route, if you want to pay for it, it is totally up to yourself, but I don’t feel that we the public in Northern Ireland should be paying additional money for people to have the choice.”

    The minister said he expected to see a “considerable” number of midwifery units being established.

    “A lot of them would be set up in association with the main maternity unit, so they would be on the same site as existing hospitals,” …

    “Women would be giving birth totally with the midwives but there would be a fallback position of having an obstetrician nearby if things do not work out.”

    Breedagh Hughes from the Royal College of Midwives said the focus was on trying to “normalise” child birth.

    … “One of the things we hope will come out in the review will be asking trusts to look at … the reasons for the Caesarean sections and to focus on trying to prevent women from having that first Caesarean section, which very often leads to the old adage – ‘once a section always a section’.”

    She said a “fear” of child birth stopped many women from choosing a natural birth.

    “When one in every three women gives birth by Caesarean section, you lose that critical mass of people who know what it is like to give birth normally, and women are losing confidence in their own body’s ability to give birth,” she said.

    Ms Hughes also welcomed proposals to shift the focus to midwife led care.

    “I think if women are given the opportunity to get to know and trust their midwife and to trust their own bodies, we’re more likely to see women saying, ‘OK, this is what nature intended me for and this is what I’m going to do’,” …

    Visit my website to explore birthing services

    Private midwife at public hospital

    Our local newspaper wrote an article about the model of care I am able to offer women:

    THE owner of Essential Birth Consulting at Bexley, Melissa Maimann, 33, has become the first private midwife in Sydney to be accredited to deliver babies in a public hospital.

    She said this was exciting news for expectant mums who want a personalised delivery but might be experiencing a high-risk pregnancy.

    Ms Maimann said her model of care was unique in Australia because it included access to a back-up obstetrician.

    “I am able to support women with risk-associated pregnancies because obstetric care is available,” she said. “This is a real benefit to women as often those with high-risk pregnancies are limited to obstetric care with little, if any, midwifery input.”

    Ms Maimann, who established Essential Birth Consulting five years ago, has helped deliver about 76 babies.

    She was profiled in the Leader last December for becoming the first private midwife in St George to receive accreditation to provide Medicare-funded private midwifery services. This has equated to savings of about $2500 a client.

    Ms Maimann limits bookings to an average of two births each month to ensure a high quality service for families. She supports natural births, including water birth, and vaginal birth after caesarean, vaginal twin and vaginal breech births.

    “We know that continuity of care is the single most important factor for women in the pregnancy and birth care and I am proud to offer it,” she said.

    “Women may have care conveniently in their home or in my Bexley clinic.”

    There were 295,700 registered births in Australia in 2009, Australian Bureau of Statistics figures showed.

    Details: 0400 418 448 or essentialbirthconsulting.com.au

    Midwives still ‘on the fringes’

    A fantastic article that my colleague in WA was interviewed for. It explains the issues perfectly.

    REFORMS to the way midwives operate in WA may have been introduced last year, but unless doctors and hospitals get on board, the reforms are meaningless according to Gosnells midwife Pauline Costins.

    Mrs Costins is the first eligible private practice midwife in the State following the reforms.

    The changes made it possible for her to provide a midwife service not attached to a hospital that women could claim a Medicare rebate for.

    Hospitals and doctors play a part in births, at least for most women, especially those with high-risk pregnancies, so there is a level of interaction required between private midwives, doctors and hospitals.

    But Mrs Costins said doctors and hospitals had not been receptive to the reforms.

    … “I’ve written to 40 doctors and received one response, which was a polite ‘no’.”

    … She added many hospitals would not allow her to provide her services in their hospitals

    “I can’t take women into hospitals as a midwife, I have to drop them at the door. They don’t want me operating in their hospital.”

    Mrs Costins said Kelmscott Armadale Memorial Hospital had made her a casual employee to let her provide her services at the hospital, but that was just a temporary solution.

    She added that as well as giving a personalised service, a private midwife … offered six weeks of postnatal care in comparison to hospital midwives who provide about three days.

    A spokesperson for the Australian Medical Association WA said the association was willing to meet with midwives to discuss collaborative agreements.

    Our experiences in NSW have not been too dissimilar. I have contacted 26 obstetricians requesting a collaborative agreement; I am very fortunate that one Obstetrician has agreed and our model of care is working really well. As for admitting rights (recommended in the Maternity Services Review), NSW is yet to finalise a policy directive to enable midwife admitting rights. This is disappointing for women and midwives alike.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services

    Medicare-funded midwifery care: What you need to know

    I am a medicare-eligible midwife. This means that my private clients may claim some of the cost of private midwifery care, much the same way we do when we see a GP. As well as Medicare benefits, some private health funds will provide benefits for childbirth education with a midwife, and costs may also be claimed through tax as a medical expense (more on that one from your Accountant). Medicare benefits and tax benefits combined are between $2,500 and $3,300. This means that care with me will be up to $3,300 cheaper than care with a non-eligible private midwife.

    The bottom line: I am confident that women will be able to claim a greater portion of private midwifery fees through various means so that private midwifery care will be absolutely affordable to most families. This is all without compromising the high standard of care and service that women experience.

    What is a Medicare-Eligible Midwife?

    In order to claim Medicare benefits from care with your midwife, you will need to ensure that your midwife is Medicare Eligible. A Medicare-Eligible Midwife meets certain advanced requirements:

    * Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
    * Midwifery experience that constitutes the equivalent of 3 years full time post initial registration as a midwife;
    * Current competence to provide pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care to women and babies;
    * Successful completion of an approved professional practice review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
    * 40 hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care (20 hours in addition to standard requirements);
    * Formal undertaking to complete an accredited and approved program of study to develop midwives’ knowledge and skills in prescribing within 18 months.

    Pregnancy care:

    * 45-60 minute consultations in your home or in my clinic
    * Childbirth education
    * Continuity of carer
    * Medicare benefits
    * Obstetric back-up

    Birth in hospital

    * Continue your care with the same midwife you know and trust, with specialist obstetric back-up readily available

    Postnatal care

    * Consultations in the your home and / or my clinic
    * Medicare benefits

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Debate to mandate a license for Oregon midwives reignites after baby’s death

    Link

    Randy Everitt, a top state health regulator, calls it “a hornet’s nest.”

    Val Hoyle, a Eugene lawmaker, calls it “a hot mess.”

    The death of a Eugene newborn as well as pressure from the state medical establishment has revived the debate over whether midwives should be allowed to deliver babies without a license. Currently, 27 states allow midwives; only in Oregon and Utah is a license for midwives optional.

    Half of the estimated 150 midwives in Oregon are licensed, an apprenticeship process that requires attending 45 births while under supervision, completing 40 hours of specialized training and passing a variety of exams. About 1,000 home births per year occur in Oregon.

    Pressure to mandate licensing for all midwives has repeatedly collided with the sentiment that birthing is not state business.

    The debate, however, is changing.

    In July after eight days of labor, Margarita Sheikh of Eugene gave birth to a boy who had no heartbeat … She blames the two unlicensed midwives … saying they refused to send her to the hospital when she asked, and didn’t appear to know how to give infant CPR …

    … News of her case has even caused some licensed midwives to publicly call for change.

    For years, Melissa Cheyney … who chairs the state Board of Direct-Entry Midwifery, has not taken a position on mandatory licensing even as she’s studied mortality rates and pushed for better reporting of birth outcomes.

    Now, however, she thinks it’s time to make licensing required. Sheikh’s options to hold her midwives accountable are limited because the state can’t investigate unlicensed midwives, says Cheyney, and “I can’t really accept that anymore.”

    … “As a feminist it’s a really hard choice for me to make, because I don’t think the government should have its laws on my body,” … “But I also think any provider … should be held to a certain clinical standard.”

    Studies have found low-risk home births to be safe: in fact, some have shown fewer complications than hospital births. Studies that include higher-risk pregnancies, however, have found home births to be less safe than ones attended by a medical doctor. Higher-risk births include breech births as well as when a woman has previously had a Caesarean.

    Certified nurse midwives, who typically attend hospital births, are required to be licensed … It’s the direct-entry midwives, who typically attend home births, at the center of the mandatory licensing debate.

    Midwives who oppose mandatory licensing say it could drive some midwives underground, hurt access to training and restricting access to home births.

    Home birthing has a devoted following based on skepticism of the medical establishment.

    Sue Burns … intentionally chose an unlicensed midwife, one without access to drugs, to ensure the birth of her daughter last year was as natural as possible. Though she ended up going to a hospital for a Caesarean after 80 hours of labor, she said she’s glad that option was a distant last resort.

    Burns says mandatory licensing would make home birthing “much less accessible. It potentially could lead down the road to home births becoming illegal, or before that home birth becoming too expensive for people who don’t have insurance to afford it. Midwives keep each other accountable and I just don’t think the state needs to step in at this point.”

    Another factor in the renewed mandatory licensing debate: A flood of investigations has driven up costs and stress for licensed midwives …

    More than 40 complaints were filed against licensed midwives in the last year, compared to an annual average of six or seven in years prior …

    The complaints required the hiring of three new investigators, he adds. To pay for it, the state is boosting annual midwife licensing fees from $630 to $1,800.

    The surge in complaints is partly explained by a 2010 law requiring medical professionals to file complaints if they have concerns over home births transferred to hospitals. But some midwives feel the medical establishment is using the complaint process to eliminate their competition …

    Ironically, the perception that any home birth transferred to a hospital will draw a complaint risks making midwives afraid to seek medical help …

    … In light of the Sheikh case, she thinks mandatory licensing is inevitable. “As a profession, we should be driving this decision, and not the Legislature and not the anti-midwifery proponents.”

    And Stella Dantas, an OHSU doctor who supports mandatory licensing, thinks the cause will be helped by a study expected to be published later this year showing Oregon has a high rate of infant mortality during labor.

    … His Eugene colleague, Hoyle, said she wants to find a compromise, “to ensure that we have a system that allows women to make appropriate choices — and to understand who’s qualified and who’s not qualified.”

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Study researches birth satisfaction for first time mothers

    Link

    A pilot … study investigating factors that contribute to birth satisfaction for first time New Zealand mothers has led to a bigger nationwide study examining how birth preparation impacts on birth satisfaction.

    … birth satisfaction is important because how a mother perceives the birth of her child influences her confidence in mothering abilities and consequently the early mother/child relationship. In turn this impacts on the child’s sense of security as well as family psychosocial health. … women … wanted to feel safe, have good relationships with those caring for them, and to have responsibility for and control over their birth processes.

    “… they had a desire to take part in decision-making about medical interventions considered necessary,”

    “These factors all contributed towards a woman experiencing birth satisfaction. In particular, vulnerable women appreciated the close relationships they established with their midwives.”

    She also found that those women needing an intervention to give birth, such as a forceps delivery, were very grateful that skilled obstetric help was available.

    “However, a poor relationship between midwife and specialist could contribute towards distress experienced by the women, as did an obstetrician’s lack of attention to bedside manner,” she says.

    “On the other hand … a few minutes taken by the obstetric team to introduce themselves and explain their roles resulted in her retaining a sense of personal control throughout the intervention. This resulted in an empowering and very satisfying birth experience for her, despite the necessity of an unexpected medical intervention” …

    Continuity models are becoming more popular, though still not the norm for most women. Private midwifery care delivers the most effective continuity for women, where women choose their own midwife and are cared for by that same midwife for their pregnancy, birth and new parenting experience.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    How do Midwives Work?

    It’s a common question I am asked! When people ask me what I do, I tell them I am a midwife. The next question is usually, “Oh, so you’re a nurse?”. “No”, I reply, “a midwife – I care for women though pregnancy and birth and with their new baby.” Then they really look puzzled. “So you’re not an obstetrician then?” “No, I’m not an obstetrician. An obstetrician is a doctor who specialises in caring for women with complicated pregnancies and births. A midwife specialises in caring for women who are having healthy pregnancies and births.” By that stage they’re well and truly confused and I start to wonder if midwifery is an invisible and undervalued role, or whether it’s simply not promoted as a care option for all women.

    The term midwife means ‘with woman’. Midwives work in partnership with women through pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. Midwives can provide care to women from the time that the woman discovers she is pregnant, right up until her baby is 6 weeks old. In fact, women who experience a normal, healthy pregnancy and birth may not see a doctor at all! Eligible midwives are able to order all the necessary tests and scans during pregnancy and may refer directly to an obstetrician if their services are necessary.

    Midwives provide education, support, advice and information, as well as doing all the routine checks of mother and baby.

    Midwives advocate measures throughout pregnancy and birth that promote normal birth: that is a birth without interventions. Midwives and are experienced in such things as water birth, active birth, and so on.

    Midwives are also specially educated to know if anything is out of the ordinary, and they can get help from obstetricians. In pregnancy, midwives see women at intervals so that any issues that may present can be dealt with before they cause any major issues.

    Women who are cared for by one midwife from pregnancy through to birth have better outcomes in terms of safety, lower rates of intervention and satisfaction with their experience. Midwives too prefer to work in this way, getting to know each family individually.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Is caesarean now the ‘normal’ way to give birth, and should we be worried?

    Link

    There’s no doubt that caesarean sections are an essential procedure that can save the lives of women and babies. But around one in three Australian women will give birth by caesarean section – and that’s not just to save lives.

    … The rising caesarean section rate in most of the developed world has not resulted in reduced rates of stillbirth or infant death – quite the contrary.

    One Australian study showed that babies were more likely to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit if they were born by elective caesarean section than other types of delivery. A previous caesarean section also increases the risk of stillbirth.

    In terms of outcomes for women, those who have emergency and elective cesarean sections are less likely to exclusively breastfeed. And there is growing evidence that caesarean operations increase the risk of the mother dying or becoming ill with blood loss, blood clots, abdominal organ injury and the need for a hysterectomy.

    It’s important to consider the risks of caesarean births. But rather than just focus on the polarised “vaginal birth vs caesarean birth” debate – which pitches doctors against midwives, and doesn’t help women who are stuck in the middle – we need to focus on the ways we can support all women to have the best outcome from childbirth.

    It seems that one of the driving forces behind the rising caesarean section rate is fear … about labour and birth, and from doctors and midwives who are themselves fearful of the birthing process.

    … we should be examining why women are fearful of labour and birth and what our health system can do to reduce this fear.

    Our health system is generally an unfriendly one for pregnant women and it’s likely that this compounds the fear of birth. It’s common for a pregnant woman receiving care in the public system to see up to 30 different caregivers through pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period.

    The opportunity for pregnant women to develop a meaningful relationship with her health care provider, discuss her fears, affirm her needs and develop confidence in labour and birth are minimal.

    … One of the disturbing elements of birth in the 21st century is the lack of respect for privacy for labouring women. The entourage of people appearing uninvited into labour rooms in most hospitals is astonishing. Each labour and birth can have a multitude of spectators, including a midwife, obstetrician, registrar, resident, student midwife, medical student and on it goes.

    … To address this problem and encourage Australian women to give birth normally, … In NSW, the Towards Normal Birth Policy was released last year and provides 10 steps towards supporting more women to go into labour and ultimately have a normal birth.

    The policy recognises that ”… unnecessary interference in the natural process may disturb the expected course and may lead to a cascade of intervention.”

    The challenge is to redesign the health system to facilitate women’s confidence and trust in birth. Fundamental changes need to occur to ensure all women are supported during pregnancy and feel confident in their ability to give birth, including:

  • Continuity of caregiver;
  • Increased options for the style of birth, with access to a birthing pool;
  • A positive environment, free of disruptions; and
  • One-to-one midwifery care in labour so women are never left alone or fearful.
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant! What are my next steps?

    If you have just found out you are pregnant, congratulations! You might be feeling a range of emotions: excited, fearful, overwhelmed, happy, anxious … this is all very normal! Many women who contact me feel unsure about what to do next and are anxious to know all their options before making a choice, so I have put together a few tips to make you feel a little more confident.

    Although many women see their GP as their first port of call when they are pregnant, it’s handy to know that women may also see an eligible midwife who can order all the necessary pregnancy tests and any scans that are needed. An eligible midwife can also talk with you about the available options for your pregnancy and birth care, in a relaxed and unhurried setting. An eligible midwife can help you determine your due date and arrange any referrals that you may need. She can book you into a hospital, refer you to an obstetrician if needed, and also provide full pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Mum sent home in taxi four hours after birth

    Link

    ON Monday night, Casey Benger gave birth to a beautiful little boy at … Hospital.

    Four hours later they were on their way home.

    The taxi driver who collected the mum and her new baby was outraged that she would be released in the middle of the night so soon after giving birth, but the hospital says it’s normal practice.

    … under the community midwifery program, if a mother has given birth before, if it was a vaginal birth, and the delivery was uncomplicated, the mother and baby can go home four hours after the delivery.

    … “I was a bit shocked at first and asked if it would be better to stay …”

    “The staff are under a lot of pressure up there. They were very busy with people coming and going …

    This is the experience for many women birthing in the public system where resources are stretched. Women can expect to be discharged home between 4 and 48 hours following birth, with some follow-up at home.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Choosing the right care provider

    Choosing the right practitioner is a very personal decision and there is no right or wrong choice. Some women will make an initial choice of care provider and decide to change care providers during the pregnancy other women will make one choice in their first pregnancy and then a different choice in a subsequent pregnancy. What’s important is understanding all the options available so that you can feel confident to choose the best option for your needs.

    When you are considering a care provider, it’s also necessary to consider where you would like to give birth and to ensure that your care provider can attend you in your chosen setting. You might choose to birth your baby in a public hospital as a public or private patient, in a private hospital as a private patient, in a birth centre or at home. It can be helpful when trying to make a decision to write down a list of questions you may have and also consider what is important to you as you make your choices. For example:

    What do I want from my care?
    What type of practitioner would I feel most comfortable with?
    Do I want public or private care?

    These are questions only you can answer. Other questions are for your care providers, and it’s a good idea to interview a few care providers – midwives and obstetricians – before making a choice. Midwives and obstetricians will charge a fee for interviews and you are able to claim this through Medicare (your midwife will need to be eligible in order for you to claim a Medicare benefit). It is important during the interview that you ask all the questions that are on your mind, and to be aware of how you feel throughout the interview. Your care provider should inspire you with confidence, help you to feel at ease and comfortable, and the appointment should feel unhurried.

    Likewise, your care provider may like to “interview” you, and this is so that your care provider can be sure that s/he can meet your needs. Maternity care is provided in a partnership and so it’s important that both parties feel really comfortable with the other.

    There are many questions you might wish to ask your care provider; the best suggestion is to consider what is important to you and write a list of questions.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Are home births safe?

    Link

    Jon Barrett is accustomed to dealing with anxious mothers-to-be. As chief of maternal-fetal medicine at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, one of the main concerns he hears from patients involves unnecessary medical interventions during delivery.

    He acknowledges that the rate of Caesarian sections and episiotomies is far too high … But he’s more unnerved by what that phenomenon appears to be triggering: a surge in demand for home births.

    Barrett’s concerns about home births stem from experience. Between 1990 and 1992, he was part of an obstetric “flying squad” in Newcastle, England. His job was to travel, by ambulance, to the bedsides of women whose home births had gone awry …

    Two incidents are particularly vivid. The first occurred in winter. Navigating the ambulance through snowy laneways, Barrett’s team arrived to find two midwives frantically working over an unconscious woman. She was in shock and hemorrhaging badly. “I’ve never seen so much blood in my life.” She survived, but only after a massive blood transfusion in hospital. The second woman developed pre-eclampsia, which caused seizures, and went into cardiac arrest as his ambulance pulled up. His team was able to restart her heart and intubate her before rushing her to hospital. She also survived. He says both conditions were unpredictable and could have occurred anywhere, “But I know they would have come less close to dying if it would have happened in hospital.”

    Unlike some of his colleagues on the squad who witnessed fetal deaths during home births, if Barrett’s memories were reduced to pure data in a typical study, they’d be unremarkable. That’s because most home birth data measures deaths, not complications, and his patients survived. “If you want a retrospective study, there’s no maternal mortality there . . . and so is that safe? No, it’s just bloody lucky.”

    The question of how best to measure home birth safety has long plagued researchers … what is counted — mortality rates for mothers and babies during childbirth — offers little insight on the maternal side because … maternal deaths from childbirth are rare … But stories like Barrett’s suggest the numbers don’t tell the whole story. In his view, the bottom line should be obvious: “Sooner or later you’re going to get a disaster because that’s the nature of obstetrics.” He adds, “It’s very rare that it will happen, but it’s got to happen more in home birth.”

    That assertion is at the heart of a furious debate in the birthing community. Mothers who choose to give birth at home often cite research showing there are fewer medical interventions and no increased risk. But in the past year, a new study has emerged that contradicts this. It shows that home births are associated with significantly higher death rates for babies. If correct, the rights of women to control their own bodies and birth experience would seem to conflict with the best interests of their children.

    When the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) released the now-controversial “Wax Study” last summer, it created the medical equivalent of the Rift Valley amongst birthing experts … [It] confirmed significant benefits to mothers who gave birth at home, including less hemorrhaging, vaginal tearing and epidural use, and fewer infections and Caesarean sections. Unfortunately, these benefits seemed to occur at the baby’s expense: … the report showed that neonatal deaths (defined as deaths within 28 days of birth) were two to three times higher for home births. Clearly, no woman who chooses home birth believes she’s jeopardizing her baby’s health, but the study suggested such faith in the safety of home birthing is undermined by medical evidence. For those who accepted Wax’s results, the benefits of giving birth at home suddenly appeared trivial compared to the risks.

    In many ways, Wax’s study was groundbreaking … a meta-analysis, combined and re-analyzed existing studies, in order to create a bigger sample and, ideally, a more accurate result. He looked at more than 230 peer-reviewed papers published between 1950 and 2009, and selected a dozen that compared planned home births with planned hospital births by low-risk mothers in industrialized countries (Australia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada and the U.S.). The study’s vast scope—it encompassed more than 500,000 deliveries—boosted its credibility. As one doctor put it, “half a million births cuts out a lot of noise.”

    Perhaps, but the momentary silence was followed by an outraged roar from home birth supporters, including some whose research showed very different results. “The Wax study is full of mathematical errors,” says Patti Janssen, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Population and Public Health, and lead author of a 2009 cohort study that showed home births to be as safe as hospital births, for women and babies. “The design was wrong, and the calculations were wrong, and it just has to be thrown out the window.” …

    … Wax initially defended his work, but then began refusing interviews … As a flood of letters poured into the AJOG … the publication convened an independent panel to examine the main complaints. In April, it published a sample of those letters, along with a detailed response from Wax. It also released the panel’s conclusion that the study did not need to be retracted.

    But the debate has continued, and gained force, in the wake of a second study … out of the Netherlands … it concluded that babies born to low-risk women, under a midwife’s care (in hospital or at home) are more than twice as likely to die as those born to high-risk women who give birth under an obstetrician.

    Although these results were specific to Holland, and may indicate problems in the way the Dutch system categorizes women as “low- risk,” the study nevertheless provided fresh ammunition to those who believe babies are best delivered by obstetricians, and added fuel to the home birth debate. More letters began to fly, adding to the stack of seemingly contradictory information through which pregnant women are required to sift in order to make an educated decision.

    Nathalie Waite could be the poster mother for the perfect home birth. Waite’s considerations were largely pragmatic when she decided, two years ago, that her fifth baby should be born at home. She had four children attending three different Toronto schools, no nanny, and wanted her delivery to disrupt life as little as possible. It wasn’t a decision she made lightly. Her husband was nervous, but Waite’s midwife reassured them both. They lived near a hospital. Two attending midwives would be in close contact with Waite’s obstetrician and, at the slightest sign of trouble, an ambulance would be in her driveway. Most importantly, Waite knew her own body. She’d had four hospital births. During the two deliveries in which she’d fought … for a natural birth she’d experienced far less pain …

    Had she known what a home delivery would be like, Waite says none of her children would have been born in hospital. “It was purely beautiful.” … “it just felt so natural. It just felt right.”

    This is why home births are special, says Anne Wilson, president of the Canadian Association of Midwives. “It’s a non-medicalized environment where birth becomes a normal part of your family life.” …

    … there is no debating the fact that home births have lower intervention rates. And everyone, on both sides of the argument, agrees that hospital intervention rates are too high …

    His daughter’s birth, in Kingston, Ont., in 2007, was such “a spectacular experience” he and his wife decided to repeat it at their new home in Guelph this year. Unfortunately, their son was born with fluid in his lungs, which concerned their midwife enough to send them to hospital. Everything they experienced from that point on, Shaw says, reinforced their preconceptions. Their son was given blood tests, a chest X-ray and an IV for a condition Shaw believes would have cleared up on its own after several hours. They had to fight for permission to breastfeed … and, he says, when the pediatrician went home without leaving instructions for release, their son remained in an incubator for an additional 15 hours. “Our rights were completely taken away and doctors more or less said this is what we’re going to do to your baby and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

    … Shaw’s mistrust of the medical system runs deep. “I’ve hung around scientists enough to be skeptical of everything I’m told,” … He and his wife refused vitamin K and erythromycin ointment for their children, two treatments hospitals and midwives administer as standard protocol after birth. (Vitamin K ensures the baby’s blood can clot until it starts making the vitamin itself, and erythromycin is an antibiotic that protects against infections from the birth canal that can cause blindness.) …

    In many ways, Shaw and Waite represent opposite ends of the home birth spectrum. Certainly Shaw’s rejection of many of the fundamental tenets of modern medicine contrasts with Waite’s attempt to adapt its benefits to a home birth. But they share an important piece of common ground: both chose to deliver their babies with the help of a midwife.

    Freebirthers, women who deliver without assistance (and often shun prenatal care), represent the smallest sub-section of home birth mothers, and aren’t included in studies on home birth safety. Among their most famous advocates is Janet Fraser, an Australian woman who made famous the term “birth rape” to describe an emergency episiotomy during the birth of her son. “I don’t care if you don’t like the word or the idea, it’s real so get used to it,” … In 2009, Fraser’s baby daughter died after five days of home labour. She continues to advocate for freebirth.

    Freebirthers make most midwives nervous and they horrify obstetricians. Freebirth is the equivalent of playing “Russian roulette with your child,” says André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). “You don’t play with a child’s life. Especially not where [health care is] free.” That said, the SOGC does believe that midwife-assisted home births are “a reasonable alternative for low-risk women.”

    Yet, asked if he would consider home birth a reasonable option for his family, Lalonde is unequivocal. “No. Definitely not.” He falls back on experience for explanation. “I’ve participated in over 6,000 deliveries in my career and I know that everything looks very fine and suddenly disaster strikes.”

    That conflict between medical experience and faith in a woman’s body to deliver naturally lies at the heart of the home birth debate. But is the concept of natural childbirth in danger of being romanticized? … There is a documentary, popular amongst home birth advocates, entitled Orgasmic Birth; its website invites viewers to “witness the passion as birth is revealed as an integral part of woman’s sexuality and a neglected human right.” Ami McKay’s award-winning novel The Birth House makes a compelling case for home births to a more mainstream audience. In it, the doctor is portrayed as a condescending, patriarchal figure who knocks out his protesting patients with ether, then yanks out their babies. In contrast, the methods of midwife Dora Rare are equally suspect (think mandrake root and witchcraft) yet portrayed with exquisite humanity …

    That kind of experience need not be exclusive to home birth, insist obstetricians. “We should be working to make the environment of the hospital conducive to the home birth experience, rather than having more deliveries at home,” Sunnybrook’s Barrett says.

    But midwives like Anne Wilson maintain there’s nothing to equal the experience of a home birth. “If I am delivering a baby in the hospital, you’re a guest in my house. If I’m delivering a baby at home, I’m a guest in your house. And there’s quite a lot of psychological difference there.” Wilson hopes the demand for home births will continue to rise in Canada … she believes that all low-risk women, including those who choose to give birth in hospital, should deliver with a midwife.

    That’s the system adopted by the Netherlands — and the Evers study suggests it’s failing dramatically …

    “I don’t think it’s that important to debate whether [homebirth is] safe, safer or not safe. I think it’s very important to debate how we can make home birth safer because women are going to do it anyway.”

    In the United States, one way to improve safety is by improving midwifery. Training and regulations are a patchwork across the country; in some states, midwives aren’t even required to finish high school. In that respect, the U.S. lags many industrialized countries, including Canada. It’s one of the reasons Canadian midwives bristle at comparisons.

    In contrast to the U.S., {Canadian] midwives are university educated, highly regulated, and well-trained in emergency skills …

    Obstetricians and midwives are in broad agreement on the key measures necessary to reduce risk during home birth. They are the steps taken by Waite: ideally, a low-risk woman would deliver with the assistance of two highly trained midwives who are in close contact with an obstetrician at a nearby hospital. When those steps are put in place, Wald­man says, “it can work almost as safely as the hospital situation.”

    Is “almost” good enough when you’re talking about the survival of a newborn baby? Although he describes himself as a long-time supporter of midwives and birthing centres, the ACOG’s Waldman echoes his Canadian counterpart, Lalonde, when he says he wouldn’t want a home birth for his wife or daughter. “The intrapartum loss rate has got to be higher at home, it’s just intuitional for anybody who does this work. How big that number is could be debated.”

    And is being debated. As larger and larger studies are undertaken, Sunnybrook’s Jon Barrett believes the data will start to show consistently higher risks associated with home births …

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Hospital births continuing through our service

    Given the troubled times for midwives attending hospitals in a birth support role – either for planned hospital birth or in a homebirth transfer situation – I have had many calls from current clients and women who are exploring their birthing options, asking if hospital births are still going ahead through this service. I wanted to provide reassurance that yes, my hospital birth service is continuing! I am continuing to take bookings for hospital birth and I am able to attend hospital births in the full capacity of a midwife.

    Owing to an ongoing collaborative agreement and hospital arrangements, hospital births are continuing. Women book with me early in their pregnancy and have all of their care with me. Women also see an obstetrician twice in their pregnancy. Birthing takes place in a hospital setting complete with waterbirthing. We support VBAC, twin and breech births. It is an all-risk model too, so women don’t need to be “low risk” to benefit from continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. It also means that there is no “transfer” if a woman’s pregnancy becomes high risk: she can still receive the same wonderful care and support from her chosen midwife and obstetrician.

    Hospital staff are not routinely involved in the care of women who book through our service and we have gone to great lengths to create a birth centre feel to the birthing rooms. Rooms are quiet, warm and peaceful and we have a variety of tools available to support natural, active birthing such as floor mats, bath, shower and birth balls and of course many women also choose to bring personal items from home.

    After the baby is born, we support early discharge with many women choosing to go home four hours after the birth. Of course women may stay longer if they wish. I visit daily for the first week, twice in the second week and then weekly until discharge at 6 weeks.

    Should there be any issues along the way, we have ready access to a specialist obstetrician who is known to the woman from pregnancy.

    So the short answer is YES! I am able to continue to attend hospital births and am receiving many calls about the popular model of care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Homebirth midwifery

    In 2010, National Registration came in and required that all health practitioners carry professional indemnity insurance. Indemnity insurance had to cover every aspect of practice. Except there would be no insurance for homebirth. Threatened with the extinction of private homebirth services, the government inserted an exemption to the requirement of insurance for a homebirth. We still need insurance for pregnancy and postnatal care, but not the actual birth …. At home.

    What about when we need to transfer women to hospital? It happens in 10% – 50% of cases, depending on how a midwife practices, how adherent she is to the ACM Guidelines, safety issues and so on.

    Typically, we go with our clients to hospital and stay to support them when they are transferred. This has not been questioned until now.

    Does “support” at a homebirth transfer constitute “midwifery practice” for which we need insurance? In considering the support vs practice issue, we should consider the sorts of situations that may arise while we are supporting a woman in hospital, and how we would respond. Please consider the following scenarios:

    1. A woman transfers from home to hospital and has a CTG (baby heart rate monitor) in progress. The private midwife is in the room with the woman and her partner. There is a concerning abnormality in the baby’s heart rate. The midwife rings the bell. Several minutes elapse. The midwife rings the bell again. Should she act (change the woman’s position, cease the Syntocinon infusion if it is in progress, increase fluids etc) or not? Because if the midwife did act she’d be practicing midwifery. Let’s assume the midwife did not act. Fast forward to the birth and there is a bad outcome. Will the midwife be considered to have been partly liable for failing to act? How will the woman see this scenario if the midwife didn’t act and her baby was harmed? Do you think the woman might try to sue her midwife who she has paid to attend her birth as advocate / support / immediate second opinion person and so on?
    2. A woman has had her baby. Hospital staff have left the room and it’s quiet time for the parents. The woman mentions to her private midwife that she feels a sudden warmth and dampness and asks her midwife to check. Should the private midwife check? Should she simply press a buzzer and wait? If she does check, she notices a concerning about of vaginal bleeding. She rings the bell and waits. Should she act to stem the flow of blood by massaging the woman’s uterus to a state of contraction? If the hospital staff come and it’s obvious that they’re run off their feet, should the private midwife assist them perhaps by preparing an IV infusion, locating equipment for them to use, reassuring the woman who is the midwife’s client as well as the hospital’s client? Who’s liable if the private midwife prepares the infusion incorrectly and the hospital staff administer it? You might think the hospital staff are liable; they might argue that the private midwife is.
    3. A woman is labouring and the hospital recommends a particular course of action which the woman does not want to follow. She looks to her private midwife for guidance. What should the private midwife say? Nothing? Because if she ventures to provide any advice, she is practicing midwifery.
    4. The hospital staff make an incorrect assessment, for whatever reason. They intend to act on this incorrect assessment with a management plan that the private midwife knows to be inappropriate for the woman. Should she speak up? If she does, she is practicing; if she does not and there’s a bad outcome, could she be liable?

    So you can understand the dilemma that is faced by a midwife who “supports” her client in hospital, and why insurance is necessary whenever “the individual uses their skills and knowledge as a … midwife”. You can also understand the conflict experienced by all – the hospital, woman and midwife, when a midwife attends the hospital with her private client.

    The homebirth exemption covers the birth at home; it does not extend to a home birth transfer. One insurance product covers labour and birth care, however it only covers the care of private patients. Obstetricians don’t – as yet – provide back-up care for home birth women, and midwives do not have admitting rights to be able to admit women. Hence, women are admitted as public patients when they transfer from a homebirth.

    This has been known for a while now, that insurance does not cover the care of public patients, women who transfer from home to hospital are public, therefore the midwife is not covered. We didn’t think it mattered because we assumed that “support” requires no insurance. Right? Wrong!

    We need to have insurance to practice, but how is practice defined? The Registration Board defines it:

    Practice means any role, whether remunerated or not, in which the individual uses their skills and knowledge as a nurse or midwife. For the purposes of this registration standard, practice is not restricted to the provision of direct clinical care. It also includes working in a direct non-clinical relationship with clients, working in management, administration, education, research, advisory, regulatory or policy development roles, and any other roles that impact on safe, effective delivery

    In effect this means if you are a private midwife, you are a private midwife wherever you are and whomever you’re with. As soon as we use our knowledge or skills, we are considered to be practicing, and we cannot not use knowledge that we have.

    Where does this leave homebirth and midwifery?

    From the woman’s perspective, who would choose a private midwife for home birth care when faced with a possibility of transfer to hospital without the private midwife whose “support” / advice would be most valuable when faced with an unexpected situation?

    From the private midwife’s perspective, who can sleep at night knowing she may have to leave a woman at the hospital gate right when the woman needs her midwife the most?

    The absurd thing about all of this is that midwives can simply unregister and have none of these issues. And they are doing just that! So long as we don’t call ourselves “midwife”, we can do just as we please. You see, we have title protection (“midwife” is a protected title), but not practice protection. Anyone can assist a woman in birth. Unregistered midwives work with no practice and referral guidelines, no regulation, no compulsory hospital booking for homebirth clients, no insurance costs, no continuing professional development costs, no obstetric consultation if it is not desired – you can do what you want, so long as you don’t call yourself a midwife. It’s absolutely legal.

    Is this a safe system of care? Is this meeting the needs of homebirth women and babies? Isn’t it far better to have a system whereby a private midwife can admit her client to hospital if need be, and continue her care in the hospital?

    It seems that no-one can force hospitals to enable admitting rights for midwives, even though this is was the Health Minister’s intention when the reforms were rolled out. We have reached a situation that requires urgent resolution.

    For now, I have taken the decision to cease my homebirth practice. I am no longer accepting homebirth bookings, however I am of course homebirthing with my booked clients who have chosen homebirth.

    This has been a distressing and difficult decision. I love attending homebirths. There’s something special about being home with a woman in labour and welcoming a baby into the world gently and peacefully at home. It’s really special. Relaxed, calm, peaceful, joyous. No hospital noises or smells, no clinical store rooms, no hospital bed and stainless steel, no doors banging, phones / pagers ringing, people yelling down corridors. Just home furnishings, carpet, softness, warmth and love. The perfect way for a baby to journey into this world. My heart is very heavy with this decision. Once I have admitting rights, I will start homebirthing again. However for now, I feel incapable of dropping a woman at the hospital gate and not supporting her through labour; and I am not willing to be seen to be practicing without insurance as this is an offense.

    I am continuing to birth with women in hospital as I am fortunate to be able to do so and we have had amazing feedback from women and their partners. I truly believe it represents the ultimate in private maternity care. No-one is ever “transferred” as we can accommodate all levels of care and care needs and women are supported by continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. This is a far superior model than home birth where any obstetric involvement entails the woman being seen by an unfamiliar obstetrician in a hospital clinic and any labour transfer entails moving to a new location to be cared for by strangers. I strive to give women and babies the very best care and in my heart, I know that our collaborative model of care is the very best in private care. I am, however, very sad to leave behind homebirth for now. It has been my passion and dream for most of my life.

    ‘Illegal’ midwives: Is Australia destined for the same?

    An article from Canada explains their midwifery system which includes unregistered midwives.

    Ann (not her real name) operates outside the regulated profession, living life on the edge, exposed to a constant threat of legal action should births under her watch go wrong.

    She knows five other unregistered midwives working in Montreal’s so-called “parallel network.” They typically help women who are unable to secure legal midwife services to have their babies at home or in a birthing centre, and who reject the official alternative of giving birth in a hospital

    There is no shortage of demand for their services. With just 140 registered midwives able to practise across the entire province, the parallel network fills a yawning gap in the market. Much of the birthing industry – obstetricians, gynecologists and some registered midwives – would consider its covert practitioners to be charlatans. But, to women determined to choose how, where and with whom they give birth, they are valued allies.

    Take Teprine Baldo, who had her eldest child, now 2 years old, at home with the help of what she calls a “midwife recognized by the community. I prefer the term. It’s more respectful. People tend to talk about illegal midwives the way they used to talk about witches,” she says.

    There has been one prosecution over the years. In 2006, Diane Boutin was forced to transfer a woman in her care to … Hospital after complications set in mid-labour. Following an emergency Caesarean, the gynecologist on duty filed a complaint with the provincial order of midwives … which went on to successfully pursue Boutin for illegal practice under Quebec’s professional code, a felony carrying a fine of up to $6,000.

    In the days before the profession began its slow march toward legalization in the 1990s, all midwives were renegades operating outside the system, some entirely self-taught, others holding foreign qualifications unrecognized by the province. But, times have changed and as the now-regulated profession wages a PR battle for public acceptance, pushing against residual resistance from an often skeptical medical establishment, it cannot be seen to condone illegal practice.

    parents are likely to be the biggest losers when things go wrong, should newborns be left damaged as a direct result of negligence or malpractice.

    It’s a hugely sensitive issue. Sinclair Harris, a registered midwife at Pointe Claire birthing centre, is sympathetic with her unregistered counterparts. But, she says, “You need an understanding of pathology, of the things that can go wrong, if you are to be available for the mainstream public.”

    Women like Baldo are incredulous that they are still being denied that choice, outraged that the black market midwives helping the most determined to exercise basic rights over their bodies risk prosecution.

    “It’s like we’re being told we can’t birth properly,” she says. “I’m not against hospitals. My issue is that there’s often no alternative.”

    At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife

    Seeking closure after a traumatic first birth in hospital, Caroline Gauthier gave birth to her second child at home with an unregistered midwife.

    She was living in British Columbia, pregnant with her first child, when her dream of an intervention-free home birth went awry. Transferred to hospital by her registered midwife after her cervix was slow to dilate, she was administered hormones to speed up labour.

    “I was like Jabba the Hutt, hooked up to the monitor,” she says. Staff forgot to turn on the oxygen supply to her mask, leaving her flailing about for help. When her baby finally arrived after a traumatic final push, she was barely able to touch his foot before he was whisked away.

    Pregnant with her second child in Quebec, she immediately set about trying to secure a midwife at the Du Boisé birthing centre in the Laurentians. However, her place was contingent on her delivering at the birthing centre.

    But Gauthier had already set her heart on giving birth at home. At 32 weeks, she dropped out of the system, switching to an unregistered midwife. Again, her labour was long, but she sat out the hours in the bath and in bed. “This time, I had a midwife who didn’t have a system to please,” she says.

    After three days of labour, the baby’s head popped out while she was on her way to the bath. “In less than two minutes, the whole body was out,” she says. He didn’t immediately cry, “but nobody made a circus out of it.”

    Vindicated by her second experience, she is now a fierce advocate of women’s right to give birth as they choose. “I was given the time my baby needed,” she says. “My neighbours tell me I was so brave delivering at home. My reaction is: ‘My God, you’re brave giving birth in hospital. You’re putting yourself at their mercy. You don’t know what you’re getting yourself into.’ ”

    The midwife: With no insurance, every new client is a gamble

    On D-day, Ann arrives on the scene with a case containing oxygen supplies, a heart monitor, synthetic oxytocin, herbal remedies, suture material and local anesthetic for stitches.

    She has been practising midwifery in the parallel network for more than 10 years. Clients find their way to her by word of mouth. She has a busy schedule year round, attending to three or four clients a month.

    Clients are generally women who have been unable to find a registered midwife …

    Occasionally she has transferred cases to hospital …

    With no insurance, every new client is a gamble. “My insurance is the trust I develop with the parents. I trust people who have the deep belief that it’s best for the birth of the baby. Nobody can be sure of the end result.”

    There is a contract, though she is clearly ill at ease with cold legal realities. “It’s about ensuring the parents understand what they’re getting into,” she says. “But, sometimes I forget to get people to sign. We’re on another level. It’s not about business.”

    She describes herself as a self-taught midwife eschewing a system where midwives are “too stressed, too watched.” …

    The four-year university program didn’t appeal to her. “I thought it was too focused on pathology. There was no alternative medicine. No spirituality,” she says. “It’s as if only one kind of intelligence is allowed. Forget emotional intelligence.”

    Midwifery was legalized in Quebec in 1999, following a five-year pilot project. Home births with the assistance of registered midwives have only been allowed since 2005.

    In a 2007 Statistics Canada report, 71 per cent of women who had delivered with a registered midwife rated the experience as “very positive,” compared with 53 per cent of women who had delivered in a hospital.

    According to research … midwife-assisted home births are associated with lower rates of obstetric interventions and adverse outcomes. Newborns born at home were also less likely to require resuscitation or oxygen therapy.

    Australia is heading for a similar situation, brought about by a few factors: the recent position statement on homebirth which effectively prevents midwives from attending high risk births at home, the lack of visiting rights to enable most midwives to birth in hospital with their clients, dissatisfaction with current hospital-based maternity services that are seen by women to be impersonal and highly interventionist, and a differing view of things such as risk and responsibility. Although some midwives are making the choice to unregister and continue to attend births, they do face the same issues that are explained in the article.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    NZ Midwifery system hailed as world leader

    Link

    New Zealand midwives provide the best care in the world for mothers and newborn babies.

    That’s how international delegates attending a major international conference on midwifery and maternity care have described New Zealand’s midwifery led maternity model of care.

    They acknowledged that New Zealand is leading the world in setting the standards for midwifery practice and professionalism, citing midwifery education, regulation and training, and strong collaboration with other health professionals.

    … The report highlighted “midwifery services as the focus of global efforts to realise the best possible care during pregnancy and childbirth for every woman and her newborn”.

    … New Zealand is alone in achieving a high level of access to midwives for all women and their babies.

    The focus of the more than 3000 participants attending the 29th Triennial Congress of the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) in South Africa was to further develop strategies to reduce maternal and infant mortality by strengthening midwifery worldwide.

    The consensus world wide is that an educated well supported midwifery workforce will improve outcomes for mothers and babies.

    … New Zealand is the only country that already conforms 100% to these new standards and competencies, and delegates from many countries are looking to us to help them with implementing similar models of midwifery care.

    Several international agencies including the United Nations Population Fund, the World Health Organisation and the International Federation of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians pledged to support the implementation of the ICM standards.

    … New Zealand midwives become degree qualified through three-year (equivalent to four years, as each academic year is 47 weeks long) Bachelor of Midwifery programmes. They are professionally accountable as they are regulated by the Midwifery Council, set up under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act of 2003.

    “The NZCOM is New Zealand’s professional organisation for midwives and we provide ongoing educational development for midwives after they are registered. We also promote ‘Standards of Practice’ through a variety of mechanisms including the Midwifery Standards Review process,” …

    While there are some very positive aspects of the New Zealand maternity system, there are also a few concerning areas, such as the huge caseloads that NZ midwives are required to take, which can impact on continuity of care and in the time that is available to each woman. That aside, they have a great system where women are supported to birth at home or in hospital, and midwives are able to access any hospital of their choosing. Hence they can provide complete continuity of care, 100% funded by the government so women are not out-of-pocket. In Australia, the gates to private practice have opened and private practice is encouraged. Eligible midwives are able to provide medicare-funded care, but there is still an out-of-pocket cost to women, as there is with any private health service. Visiting rights have not yet been established, but some private midwives have negotiated ways of birthing in hospital with their clients. And of course homebirth remains an option. Hopefully in years to come, Australia will also be hailed as a midwifery world leader.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Well-off mothers spend thousands on private midwives

    An article
    from the UK explains that women are spending thousands of pounds on private midwives to achieve the ‘perfect’ birth. The situation is not too different to the Australian experience.

    In the UK, private midwives charge between £1,800 and £5,000 for a birth, but their services are in high demand from professional, well-educated women who have become disenchanted with the hospital experience. The number of mothers paying for private midwives to attend home births has tripled in the last eight years.

    Demand has become so high in parts of London and the South East that some expectant mothers have been unable to find a private midwife to assist them.

    Many of the expectant mothers are older and have been put off by previous experiences in NHS maternity wards.

    Women who engage private midwives claim they can form a relationship with one person rather than seeing a succession of strangers.

    Midwives understand that women want continuity of care and someone to talk to them and answer their questions. Women don’t want routine and unnecessary interventions in their pregnancy and birth, and they want more extensive postnatal care.

    The Australian experience is the same as that in the UK. Women seek private midwifery care for home birth or hospital birth so that they can form a relationship with one person who will be with them from their first antenatal appointment, through to birth and 6 weeks after their baby is born.

    In Australia, eligible midwives can provide medicare-funded care which makes private midwifery care more affordable to women, thanks to the maternity reforms.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Homebirth Position Statement

    The Australian College of Midwives (ACM) is Australia’s professional body for midwives. Recently, ACM was charged with the task of preparing a position statement on home birth. This position statement will have a great impact on the future of home birth services in Australia, so it is of enormous significance to home birthing women and their midwives. As well as a position statement, ACM has developed a Guidance which clarifies the expectations for private midwives when providing midwifery care for a planned homebirth.

    The documents are:
    Literature Review
    Homebirth position statement
    Guidance for private midwives attending homebirths

    Probably the best way to read these documents is to start with the literature review because it provides the context for the guidance and position statement.

    ACM’s literature review was restricted to studies which met all of the following criteria:

  • Studies of planned homebirths with a registered provider/s, compared with planned hospital birth
  • Research articles that also addressed maternal and neonatal outcomes
  • Articles from developed countries, written in English and with a publication date between 1995 and 2011.
  • Any articles that did not describe studies which included a comparison group, investigate planned homebirths or relate to maternal and/or neonatal outcomes were excluded. This rigorous process identified eleven studies which formed the basis of the literature review. The review covered 352,655 homebirths from Australia and around the world.

    In general terms, the studies say that for a low-risk, healthy woman and baby, midwife-attended home birth does not increase the chance of the baby dying or being harmed. Home birth does, however, increase the chance that the woman will have a drug-free, intervention-free birth: that her labour will most likely start on its own, progress normally and lead to a normal birth with little likelihood of needing any stitches. Also, she is far more likely to breastfeed and to experience her birth as very positive and satisfying. This is important because it is well-known that interventions carry risks and that there can be a cascade effect, so that when you begin with one intervention, you often end up doing more interventions as the labour progresses (eg induction leading to long labour, leading to epidural, leading to forceps delivery). This is all minimised in the group of women and babies who birth at home with a qualified midwife who has a link in to the hospital with ready access to obstetric and paediatric care if needed.

    However, a small number of studies demonstrated that home birth increases the rate of perinatal mortality. The research suggests that the inclusion of high risk factors in home birth, increases the chance of a baby dying or being seriously harmed during birth (most commonly through low levels of oxygen). Other issues may relate to the time and distance to travel from home to hospital during labour if transfer is needed, as well as the woman’s acceptance or refusal of recommended interventions once she has transferred. It is important to note that the outcomes of women and their babies who transfer to hospital during labour will generally compare unfavourably with those not transferred due to the change in risk status of the women.

    The ACM concludes that, “It seems evident from the literature that planned home birth is a safe option for women who are at low risk of complications and who receive care from qualified attendants with adequate access to support, advice, referral and transfer mechanisms.”

    With that conclusion in mind, the ACM has developed a position statement on home birth, and following on from that, guidance for private midwives who attend home births. Much discussion has been had about these documents on various forums and email lists. Some excerpts from the position statement and guidance follow:

    It is the position of the Australian College of Midwives that home is an appropriate place of birth for women considered to be at low obstetric risk, and that women must be supported in safe, planned homebirth, by midwives and/or other appropriately qualified and regulated health professionals with adequate access to support, advice, and referral and transfer mechanisms.

    Some women may choose a planned homebirth even when this is not recommended by her care providers. In such circumstances, a midwife should, after discussions with each woman and in consultation with other health professionals, work with the woman looking for options and resolutions within midwifery professional standards to address the woman’s needs.

    Following documented discussions and appropriate consultation and referral as may be indicated, a midwife has the right to decline to continue to provide, or to accept, midwifery care if it is felt that this would require the midwife to practise outside of the midwife’s scope, skills and competencies.

    Midwives have a duty of care to each woman they provide care to, and this means that in labour, or urgent situations, a midwife must attend the woman.

    In the absence of a consistent definition of ‘low obstetric risk’, low obstetric risk is considered to be a pregnancy, labour and birth that are anticipated to be problem free.

    There are some contraindications to a planned homebirth which women should be informed of at booking. These are;
    • Multiple pregnancy
    • Abnormal presentation (including breech presentation)
    • Preterm labour prior to 37 completed weeks of pregnancy
    • Post term pregnancy of more than 42 completed weeks
    • Scarred uterus

    Issues identified as “B” or “C” in the Australian College of Midwives National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral (“the Guidelines”) would require consultation with an Obstetrician prior to proceeding with a planned homebirth. Consultation is mandatory for the midwife providing care.

    Women must be made aware of the midwife’s obligation to consult at – or prior to – booking-in.

    Ideally, midwives should meet the criteria for gaining notation as an Eligible Midwife.

    Midwives must ensure that they have documented processes in place for consultation and referral

    Any decision to provide care for a planned homebirth should take into account the possibility of transfer to a hospital and the time needed for transfer to that hospital in the event that this is deemed necessary. Women should be counselled on the possibility of transfer, and midwives should ensure that the supporting hospital is provided with a care plan/documentation around the woman’s intention for a planned homebirth.

    Midwives must utilise documented evidence-based guidelines to support antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal midwifery care.

    Midwives should undergo a formal professional peer review process at least once every three years.

    At – or prior to – booking, the midwife must advise the woman of situations where homebirth cannot be supported. At any time, the midwife is not obliged to participate in a homebirth that the midwife considers will increase the risk of harm to the woman or her baby.

    Women must be respected in the choices that they make, and that includes choices to refuse a recommended course of action at any stage of her pregnancy,

    An information pack should be made available to women that should include a ‘Terms of Care’ document outlining the terms under which midwifery care will be provided.
    Information should also include the potential for transfer to hospital for unforseen complications.
    The following information must be provided to women at the onset of their care, ideally in writing, followed up in discussion and signed by the woman:
    • Midwifery scope of practice, including the Australian College of Midwives Guidelines for Consultation and Referral;
    • Philosophy of care;
    • Choice of birth setting, including requirements for homebirth;
    • Contact information for the midwife;
    • Back-up arrangements;
    • Standards of practice and protocols, including consultation and referral
    • Responsibilities of the woman;
    • Confidentiality and access to the woman’s records (privacy agreement); and
    • Financial arrangements

    It’s fair to say that ACM’s position statement and guidance are not ideologically- or belief-driven. It’s clear that the documents are driven by evidence. ACM has tackled the conflicting issue of the woman’s negative right to autonomy versus the midwife’s responsibility to practice safely and within accepted standards of care. While much is being said on various forums, email lists and face-to-face about these documents, somehow, I can’t help but wonder if the issue is really about the restriction of home birth to low-risk women, or the fact that at this point in time, a woman and private midwife have no option but to birth at home.

    In the whole of Australia, there is currently no clinical privileging except in one small hospital. A high risk woman’s only option via this new position statement is to birth in hospital, however her private midwife would not be able to attend in the full capacity of midwife – or even as a support midwife: it has recently come to our attention that the midwife cannot legally attend in hospital at all.

    I’ll explain why: the MIGA insurance policy covers privately-admitted patients. If the woman is admitted as a public patient after being transferred from a home birth (either in pregnancy or during labour), MIGA insurance does not provide indemnity cover to the midwife in respect of the birth. Most women planning a home birth will have a back-up hospital booking as a public patient. Hence, when the midwife goes in with the woman, the midwife’s insurance does not cover her. It is against the requirements of registration to work without insurance, except at a home birth. In other words, the midwife would be attending the woman in hospital against the requirements of registration.

    In time (hopefully sooner rather than later), midwives will have admitting rights where we can admit, care for and discharge our own private patients, all funded by Medicare and indemnified by MIGA but in the meantime, this is not possible.

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Doctor backs call for reform of maternity care in Greater Manchester

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    A top Greater Manchester doctor has backed a national call for reform of maternity care.

    Dr Michael Maresh, clinical lead for the Greater Manchester Maternity Network, spoke out after a major report recommended a reorganisation of services.

    The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology called for more midwifery-led units to be set up so women with low-risk pregnancies could be in the sole care of midwives.

    It also calls for the number of consultant units be reduced so that senior clinicians are available around the clock.

    … “The fact is that there are too many maternity units which means senior doctors’ availability is spread too thinly – reorganisation to provide fewer, specialist units is the only sensible solution.

    “… we are in the process of reducing the number of maternity units and ensuring that the new model of care concentrates the expertise of doctors and midwives on eight, better staffed and safer sites.

    “By providing a co-located midwife led facility at each of the remaining units, we are able to offer improved choice to the majority of women who experience an uncomplicated birth.”

    With good referral systems and collaboration, a model such as this would work very well. The majority of women are healthy and have normal pregnancies and births, if they are given the right support, information and care. The midwifery model of care is a safe and satisfying model of care for healthy women.

    Expectant mothers need facts, not fear

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Here we go again. A debate about home vs hospital birth.

    There is only one thing … that’s more emotive than where you give birth to a baby, and that is how you feed it.

    This week, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists … proposed that more women give birth away from doctors and hospitals. I really want to see how this works, because if there’s anyone more scared of home births than the parents, it’s doctors and midwives. (Note: not all, I know.)

    I’m not a doctor, nor a midwife. I have slightly more experience of pregnancy and birth than some, by virtue of being co-founder of a parenting website for the past seven years and working as a lay rep in a large maternity hospital for four. But really, my opinion, just like so many birthing women, counts for little.

    Look at what this report says: “The model we are proposing focuses on the needs of the woman and her baby by providing the right care, at the right time, in the right place, provided by the right person and which enhances the woman’s experience.” Sound great, doesn’t it? But who will decide what the right care, at the right time, etc, is? Who listens to what a mother … wants?

    Hospitals are so tied by NHS policy and guidelines, and are so scared of being sued that midwives who once were perfectly capable of delivering breech babies, big babies or twins at home (yes, it can be done) no longer can, or do. So it’s easier to book everyone into the hospital. What will change? How will it change? There aren’t enough midwives as it is.

    When I decided to try for a home birth I had to take myself out of the NHS system (an option that may no longer exist soon because of the threat to our independent midwives, but that is another story, for another time) because the idea so terrified almost everyone I met. I was simply deemed too high-risk. But this wasn’t based on any analysis of my actual, individual risks. It was because I ticked two boxes: “over 40″ (this is still being cited as a reason not to have a home birth) and “previous C-section” (ditto). One of the paediatricians at the hospital where I was a lay rep told me I was being irresponsible, that my scar would tear (the risk of uterine rupture is, in fact, very small) and that I’d kill myself and my baby.

    “Don’t expect us to attend to you” were her actual words. Amazingly, because I wasn’t on a dual suicide/infanticide mission, and I didn’t want to leave my firstborn motherless, I asked two separate, senior midwives to go through my previous notes with a fine-tooth comb. Conclusion: no reason at all not to try for a home birth if you want to …

    For many … the thought of giving birth at home is terrifying. I toyed with the idea of a home birth with my first for about 10 minutes. It was only when I saw firsthand what hospitals could offer and after five years of researching birth that I was brave enough even to think about it for my second baby.

    I’ll cut to the chase. I had my home birth without drugs or incident. Yes, it was fantastic. No, you shouldn’t have to have a home birth if you don’t want to, no more than I should have had to go to hospital if I didn’t want to. This brings me on to something that no report can ever address, and that’s the baggage we all – health professionals included – bring into maternity services: our own experiences. They should inform, but not dictate.

    There is one bit of the report that I think is underplayed: … “Women themselves need the support and encouragement of society, including the professionals, to take responsibility for their own health”. Indeed, we all need to take responsibility for how babies are born. Women need to stop dramatising labour, especially to their daughters. (Maternal influence is huge on a daughter’s subsequent expectation of her own labour.) Health professionals need to stop lecturing a woman on how to give birth and start listening to what women want – and then provide consistent, accurate, non-emotive information to help her set the agenda.

    We all need to stop projecting our own experiences and think that’s how it will/should be for everyone else. Only then can we hope to reverse this collective hysteria that surrounds giving birth. People who make TV programmes and films: I have a special message for you, because how you portray birth is so hugely influential. I know it makes for better TV to have a woman on her back, in a hospital, screaming and tearing off her husband’s earlobes, but please, counterbalance this with women also giving birth quietly, in a position other than prone and sometimes at home. It’s partly because of you that it took me nearly 40 years to realise that it could be done.

    Melissa Maimann & Andrew Pesce: Collaborating for success

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    ALTHOUGH only a handful of collaborative arrangements have been signed between obstetricians and midwives since national maternity reforms were introduced in November, calls for a policy rethink are premature and counterproductive.

    In fact, the reforms provide an exciting opportunity for collaborative maternity care that is safe, locally responsive and woman-centred.

    A variety of private maternity care models are possible and we are confident these will build on Australia’s strong record of safety and quality in maternity care. They will also meet the needs of women who want the familiarity and the comfort of knowing the obstetrician and midwife who will be with them through their pregnancy, birth and new parenting experience …

    Obstetricians may be concerned that the new arrangements mean they will not be directly involved in patient care until something goes wrong, while some midwives fear that the arrangements will be used to control midwifery practice, adversely impact on childbirth choices and promote anticompetitive restriction of trade.

    We believe we are the first private obstetrician-midwife team in Australia to have successfully negotiated a formal collaborative arrangement and we are very happy with how it has progressed since our first discussions.

    The first woman under our joint care gave birth in March this year and we have several others booked through to January 2012.

    We share a similar philosophical approach to maternity care and have agreed practice guidelines that we believe to be safe, evidence-based and woman-centred …

    … Women appreciate the continuity of care, and the assurance that an obstetrician they have met will be involved if medical assistance is required. Feedback from women so far has been outstanding. The main criticism has been that this model of care is not available in other hospitals.

    One of the reasons why there are currently so few collaborative arrangements has been the time taken by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency to endorse eligible midwives and by public maternity units to credential midwives in private practice.

    … Our agreed guidelines are explained to patients before they engage our services and childbirth choices are not restricted. In fact, choices are enhanced as the midwife is able to attend births in the full capacity of a midwife in hospital.

    Importantly, our model of care does not dictate “transfer” of care, merely a shift in the balance of obstetric and midwifery care because we recognise that every pregnant woman needs her own obstetrician and midwife. We support midwife care during waterbirth, vaginal birth after caesarean section, physiological birth positioning and physiological third stage.

    Change is often difficult as we all tend to be creatures of habit. This change brings with it many opportunities for obstetricians and midwives in private practice to work together in ways that are beneficial to both and, importantly, to the women in their care.

    … The maternity reforms will succeed if we remember that midwives and obstetricians are in it for the same reason — to provide safe care that meets the needs of our patients, within a respectful, professional environment.

    Dr Andrew Pesce is an obstetrician practising in Sydney and immediate past president of the AMA. Ms Melissa Maimann is a midwife in private practice based in Sydney.

    Home birth has pros and cons

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    The number of at-home births is small but growing as pregnant women weigh the idea of a drug-free and surgery-free birth in a familiar setting versus the risk of harm to the baby in case of complications.

    When most pregnant women go into labor, they pack their bags for the hospital. When Lara Carlos felt the contractions in November 2008, she set up a birthing tub in her bedroom.

    For the next several hours, Carlos alternated between padding around her home and squatting and pushing in the tub. Her midwife poured water down her back and dabbed her forehead with cold towels. When the baby (they chose the name Vincent) arrived at 1:21 a.m., he spent his first few hours cuddling with his parents in their bed.

    Carlos … is one of a small but growing number of women who are choosing to deliver their babies at home. Her first son, Ivan, had been delivered in a hospital, and she says she found labor at home a dramatic improvement.

    “In the hospital, there were seven medical students in the room when I was pushing my son out,” she said. “At home, it was a very quiet, slow experience, and the water helped me to relax.”

    Though home births account for only about 1% of all births each year … they increased by 20% from 2004 to 2008 … The practice is most popular among well-educated mothers who favor natural childbirth without the drugs or surgeries a hospital might use.

    … The increase has reenergized the fierce debate over the safety of at-home delivery. The practice is officially frowned on by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists … because the absence of emergency medical equipment and specialists accustomed to dealing with complications means that problems during labor could cost the baby’s life.

    “All the existing scientific evidence, as well as state and national statistics, make it ultra-clear that home birth increases the risk of death,” …

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists does acknowledge that home births are associated with fewer medical interventions than hospital births … 61% of women who had vaginal delivery received an epidural in 2008, the year the report studied. And a 2006 national survey of women’s childbearing experiences showed that 55% were given Pitocin to speed labor.

    “There’s no doubt that once you end up in a hospital, you end up with more interventions — that’s what drives some families away,” … home birth is reasonable as long as women have few risk factors …, have an emergency backup plan and understand the risks involved.

    Women also turn to home birth in order to avoid caesarean sections, which have become more common as obstetricians became increasingly reluctant to take chances at the slightest sign of fetal distress …

    What’s more, many hospitals do not allow women who have previously had a caesarean to attempt a vaginal birth because of the risk of uterine rupture, even though a 2010 National Institutes of Health advisory panel concluded that the risk of uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one caesarean was just 1% and that more women should be offered the choice. Women wishing to have a VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean) may have no option but to do so on their own turf.

    Sarah … had two caesareans but chose a home birth for her third pregnancy, successfully delivering a baby girl in January 2010.

    “We had visited numerous hospitals, and the first time I mentioned a VBAC, I was just shut down completely,” Bolson says. Doctors refused to consider it because of the chance of rupture, she recalls, and one said he couldn’t risk having his medical malpractice insurance skyrocket.

    She eventually found a certified professional midwife who was willing to help her deliver at home, with a backup plan of transfer to a nearby hospital. Though initially worried about complications, “after I was able to release the fear, I was free to birth without any inhibition.”

    Many home-birth moms also say they object to other aspects of hospital births, such as having to lie in a bed, abstain from food during labor and be monitored by an army of nurses.

    “I believe in the intuitive power of the human body,” said Mayim Bialik, an actress and natural-birth advocate who has given birth at home. “I believe in having as much privacy as possible, in being able to move freely, to eat when I want, drink when I want, and to be surrounded by the sounds and smells of what is familiar to me.”

    “Other mammals go off on their own to labor,” adds Dr. Stuart Fischbein, a Los Angeles-based obstetrician who has been delivering exclusively in homes since 2010. “When a patient goes to a hospital, she gets told to lay flat on her back strapped down with monitors with constant interruptions from hospital personnel — does that sound conducive to having a normal labor?”

    Arrangements for a home birth go something like this: Early in the pregnancy a woman finds either a … midwife … The midwife provides some or all of the woman’s prenatal care and is on call as the woman approaches her due date …

    During labor, many women use water tubs because they find the water soothing and pain-relieving; others choose to just move about their homes as they see fit. The midwife monitors the fetus’ heart tones with a Doppler device, and most also bring equipment such as oxygen tanks, anti-hemmorhagic medication, local anesthetic and suturing supplies in case of tearing or bleeding. If an emergency arises that the midwife can’t manage, home-birth moms are advised to transfer immediately to a hospital.

    The core of the home-birth debate lies with the safety of the baby — and here, opinions and the data are sharply divided. A 2005 study of 5,418 births in the U.S. and Canada during 2000 … found that the neonatal death rates of at-home births were comparable to those of births in hospitals.

    But a July 2010 analysis published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology examined the outcomes of 12 home-and-hospital-birth studies and found that babies born at home die at two to three times the rate of those born in hospitals …

    … the distance to the nearest emergency room can sometimes mean the difference between life and death. “Saying, ‘trust birth’ is like saying ‘trust the weather,’” she says, referring to a slogan occasionally used in natural-birth groups.

    Just as vocal online communities have sprung up to promote home birth, so too have others populated by women whose home-birth attempts turned into tragedies … Liz Paparella’s fourth child was stillborn on her living room couch because her midwife failed to take Paparella to the hospital when she began bleeding during labor.

    “I never thought it was more dangerous to have a baby at home than at the hospital,” says Paparella, who had given birth successfully at home two times previously. “In birth, the risk can change from low to high in a matter of minutes.”

    … A clear answer to the safety question is hard to find because nearly every home-birth study has some flaw that is flagged by one side of the debate or the other as invalidating the results. Given this uncertainty, Ouzounian cautions women to research, prepare and choose wisely.

    Home births, he says, should be considered only by those who have a well-trained midwife and are experiencing no complications with their pregnancy …

    “Under the right circumstances, with the right patient selection and with a … midwife attending, the overall maternal complication rates with home births are comparable” to those of a hospital birth …

    But he also advises women not to think about birth in black-or-white terms: There are many ways to make delivery more “natural” even if it takes place in the hospital …

    Fischbein says that doctors could be more accommodating to their patients by providing them with information about all of their birth options — at home and in the hospital — and stand ready to serve as backups for those who wish to labor at home with a midwife.

    “There’s room in this world for low-risk home birthing and for hospital birthing,” he says. “We really should support each individual woman’s right to choose how to deliver her baby.”

    Thank this doc for the episiotomy you won’t have

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    When you picture a birth activist, you probably imagine a 20-something woman marching in the streets with an enormous belly.

    You are less likely to envision a 70-something academic and grandfather.

    And yet physician Michael C. Klein has had – and continues to have – a remarkable impact on the lives of mothers and babies around the world.

    Klein is the first to admit that he owes a good measure of the birthing wisdom that first sparked his career to a group of midwives he met in Ethiopia, back when he was on a year-and-a-half leave of absence from medical school at Stanford University.

    … “The midwives let me catch babies,” …

    He was fascinated by natural childbirth: by the way midwives delivered babies without episiotomy …

    What he learned from those midwives set the stage for Klein’s entire career, igniting his interest in old and new birth technologies and the need to improve maternity care.

    It also set him on a collision course with his professors when he returned to Stanford. “If you want to practice primitive medicine, you will have to go to the county hospital,” he was told. His crime? Delivering babies without episiotomy.

    Fortunately, Klein is not someone who is easily dissuaded. Faced with resistance, he simply applies additional gentle, consistent pressure. That was his style then and it continues to be his style today … he reviewed the information on episiotomy in every edition of Williams’ Obstetrics from the 1920s through the early 1990s in his quest to challenge the traditional wisdom about the procedure …

    His best-known study … turned decades of obstetrical thinking on its head by demonstrating that episiotomy caused the very types of trauma that it was believed to prevent …

    … What drives his research is his concern about mothers and babies … he’s also troubled by the fact that technology is becoming a routine part of the birth environment, even though research suggests that epidurals and non-stop electronic fetal monitoring should only happen when specifically warranted.

    “The fundamental problem is not about normal childbirth; it’s about making normal childbirth abnormal,” he explains. “When we treat high-risk women in high-risk settings, we lower their risk. When we treat low-risk women as if they were high risk, we increase their risk and create complications. That is what we are doing today.”

    His research has shown that the younger generation of obstetricians (those age 40 or younger) is more likely to support the routine use of technology during birth than older obstetricians … Klein blames this on fear of normal birth, the result of simply not having attended enough normal births to build confidence in the process.

    Today it’s midwives who tend to be the guardians of normal birth … midwives’ thoughts and beliefs about birth are very much in synch with those of normal birth.

    … the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC)… recently issued a press release objecting to comments he made in a press release issued by the University of British Columbia describing his most recent research.

    Klein, in turn, describes the SOGC as a very progressive organization. His issue is with the obstetrical profession as opposed to the SOGC itself: “The problem is that society has invested surgeons with control over normal childbirth.”

    He’d really prefer to sidestep the politics entirely to focus on what matters most to him. “I’m primarily interested in the well-being of mothers and babies rather than the internal politics of medicine. I see nothing incompatible with promoting family practice and midwifery.”

    Lack of collaboration stalls maternity reform

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Midwives urge government to relook at legislation.

    The government’s maternity reforms are “doomed to fail” as a result of obstetricians refusing to enter into collaborative arrangements with midwives.

    … “We always feared that these arrangements would be more about control than collaboration,” … only … three [collaborative agreements have been signed] …

    “Midwives are asking obstetricians in writing and calling up to 10 times to organise collaboration. Some get no response, some a polite no and others a very rude no,” …

    “We did expect that this would be the case. When you put one competing professional group over another group competing for the same market share, the group in control isn’t going to do something that threatens their sizeable share. I can understand that they are threatened.”

    It is true that there are only one or two obstetricians who have signed collaborative agreements with midwives, and only one that I know of whose agreement covers labour and birth care. This is disappointing because the models of care that are possible with collaborative agreements between private obstetricians and private midwives are so beneficial for women.

    Maternity Reforms: Good news for expanded birthing options

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Maternity reforms came into effect in November 2010 which gave women access to Medicare benefits for private midwifery care for the very first time. In addition, eligible midwives were to be able to order relevant tests and ultrasounds through Medicare. Medicare benefits are available to clients of eligible midwives for pregnancy and postnatal care, however there is no benefit for birth care at home.

    So, 6-odd months on, how are things looking for maternity care and what possibilities await us?

    Well, for a start, we had around 200 private midwives in Australia. 6-odd months into the reforms and we have at least 30-40 eligible midwives. Some of those 200 midwives have ceased private practice, leaving about 100 in private practice. So 30-40 eligible midwives represents a 30%-40% update of the maternity reforms by the current private practice workforce in just 6 months. That is phenomenal. As well as this, private practice has become a more attractive option to employed midwives now that private practice is medicare-funded and indemnified. So in months and years to come, we will have more midwives in private practice, and less in the hospital employed system. This is not a concern as the hospitals would not need their own staff: women will bring their midwife with them to the hospital when they come in to birth their babies. From the hospitals’ perspective, this is excellent news: they may benefit from significant cost savings in terms of recruitment, retention, staff education, pay-roll, rostering, management and so on.

    What about for women? Well, it is well-known that women benefit from exclusive one-to-one midwifery care through pregnancy, labour, birth and the postnatal period. When women are cared for exclusively by one midwife, we know that they experience lower rates of interventions without compromising safety, and they experience higher rates of satisfaction with their birth and new parenting experience. When women choose a Eligible midwife, they can access significant medicare benefits that do reduce the cost by quite a lot. Depending on the number of pregnancy and postnatal consultations a woman has, the benefits range from say $1,000 – $2,500.

    However, in order for eligible midwives to provide medicare-rebatable services, midwifery care needs to be delivered within a collaborative arrangement. And this does open the possibility for private midwives and private obstetricians to work together in collaborative practice. The huge benefit to the woman is that she has midwifery care right the way through, from early pregnancy to 6 weeks after her baby arrives, with the reassurance of having a known obstetrician who is available is needed. Women meet the obstetrician twice in pregnancy, and the obstetrician is available for labour and birth if his care is needed, and in this way, women can benefit from the ultimate in continuity of carer. This model of care is now available for the very first time in Australia history, and we are very pleased to be able to offer it to women. So far it is a very popular option! More to come.