Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

Normal Birth

“I’ve been told my baby is big”

and my care provider wants to induce me / schedule a caesarean.

An interesting dilemma. What to do? A recent article has found that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia (a big baby) at term is inaccurate in the majority of cases, and this inaccuracy may be contributing to unnecessary caesarean sections.

In an observational cohort study of 235 pregnancies at term in which ultrasound measurements led to a diagnosis of fetal macrosomia, only about a third of the infants were actually macrosomic at birth. Additionally, these pregnancies with ultrasound-diagnosed fetal macrosomia were more than twice as likely as all pregnancies in the population to end in cesarean delivery

Surprisingly, the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing fetal weight is similar to that found with simple clinical palpation (feeling the size of the baby through the woman’s abdomen)

The [average] percentage error of the estimated fetal weight was 8.6% overall. Viewed another way, 44% of the weights were off by more than 10%, and 7% were off by more than 20%.

The mode of delivery was cesarean section in 66% of the pregnancies, compared with just 29% of all pregnancies in Calgary during the same period. “So it’s [more than] double, the percentage who are getting C-sections, on what is [an inaccurate weight]

It’s a difficult situation for the care provider when considering what to say to a pregnant woman. Tell any woman her baby might be “big” and she’ll rightly be scared. And this fear can impact the birth and lead to interventions. Conversely, is it ok to say, “Your baby is the perfect size for your pelvis and you’ll birth your baby beautifully”? What if it doesn’t quite work out this way for this woman?

I like to let women know that size isn’t everything. We all know this! The position of the baby is also really important as is the strength of the contractions, a woman’s morale and motivation, her support team, and the decisions she’ll make with her care provider.

A woman can have a “small” posterior baby that results in a long labour … or a “large” but well positioned baby that results in a smooth and easy labour. I’ve known many women to have a caesarean with their first baby – women will say, “He didn’t fit. It was a long labour and I only got to 4cm and he was only 3.4Kg” and they go on to have a 4kg baby next time in a four hour labour with no tears.

My feeling is that it is ok to let a woman know that her baby feels like it might be larger than expected so that the woman can proactively plan for her labour with things like upright positions in labour, positions that open the pelvis and positions that help her to relax. It’s always important to be truthful as this builds trust. It’s also really important to talk about the position of the baby as I often find that a baby’s position in labour is more important than its size. It’s not about creating fear and disappointment by suggesting, “Your baby is h.u.g.e … you’ll need a caesarean for sure. In fact, why don’t we book it in now and you can save yourself hours of labour only to end up with a caesarean?” But rather to explain that the baby feels larger than expected, that babies grow at different rates and that size is not the only important factor. And then work with her to help her to understand positions and strategies that will help her through her labour. In my own practice, only 4% women having their first babies have a caesarean, compared with 25% as the National average for first-time mums. I wonder how many caesareans can be avoided by providing continuity of care for women through pregnancy, birth and the new parenting experience?

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Cascade of intervention

A study has found that first-time mothers who have their care within the general hospital system and have their labour induced, face a greater risk of having a caesarean section than those who wait for labour to start on its own.

In the study, 44 percent women had their labour induced, and 20% of those inductions failed (ie, labour did not start) and caesareans were performed in those cases.

By definition, induction is performed before a woman’s body is ready for labour, and this may point to the reason for such a high rate of failed inductions. In other cases, the reason for the induction is also the reason that the caesarean became necessary. For example, a labour may be induced because of concerns for the baby, and once in labour, the baby shows signs that it is not tolerating labour well and so a caesarean is performed.

The study does point to the issue that inductions should not be performed unless they are genuinely necessary. Up to 50% inductions may not be “indicated”, that is, performed for a medical reason. They might be performed more for convenience, for example. However, if we limit inductions to those which really need to be done, we would lower the caesarean rate.

There are some reasons when an induction might be a good idea, such as when the woman’s blood pressure is high, if the pregnancy goes beyond 42 weeks, if the waters have broken for many hours and labour has not started, if there are concerns for the baby and so on.

Before any induction is commenced, it’s important that women are fully informed by their care provider of the reasons for the induction, the alternatives, the process and procedure, what to expect and the likely outcome.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

What are the best positions for labour?

The best positions for labour and birth will be the positions that are the most comfortable for the woman. These are usually also the positions that will assist the baby into a good position to be born.

The positions you decide to use will have an effect on your sense of control and how you experience your labour. Generally, women who are able to move around as they need to, will expefince labour more positively and as being less painful, than women who are confined to the bed.

There are many positions that women will naturally adopt in labour, such as:
- Standing
- Leaning over a bench or couch
- All fours positions
- Kneeling positions
- Walking
- Lying on your side

Because gravity helps the baby’s head to descend deeply into the pelvis, upright positions are generally better for aiding progress in labour while also reducing pain. This is because upright positions work with the body in labour, rather than against it.

Many women choose to birth in the water because the sensation of being in water combined with the lack of gravity makes them feel more mobile and able to position in the best way possible to help the baby move through the pelvis.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Natural Twin Birth

I had a difficult delivery with my first baby, including posterior presentation, premature rupture of membranes, meconium staining, stalled labour, 18 hours of Syntocinon, a largely ineffectual epidural, a 4 hour second stage, and forceps delivery. My daughter had severe respiratory distress and was in the NICU for several days. It was a very tough introduction to parenthood and left me quite traumatised, especially the separation from my daughter. My husband and I decided that we would try for a homebirth if we had another baby, in the hope that a calmer environment would assist the birth process. When I fell pregnant again, we found a lovely homebirth midwife.

I started to show really early. At 8 weeks I was in maternity wear. I thought it was just because it was a second pregnancy, but a 9 week ultrasound showed TWO BABIES. We were completely shocked as there are no twins in my family. Twins of course meant that a homebirth was out of the question.

There followed many long months of argument with various obstetricians about our birth choices. We wanted as little intervention as possible. A standard twin delivery involves syntocinon (which I was very afraid of, after the previous experience), continuous monitoring (which I had hated with my first birth, as I felt chained to the bed) and an epidural prior to the second stage, in case positioning/version or a c-section is necessary to deliver the second twin. In my first birth, the epidural meant I had no pushing urge and seriously compromised my ability to deliver my daughter, hence the very prolonged second stage, so I did not want an epidural this time around, although I was prepared for Synto to be administered between the twins if labour did not re-establish. The hospital also wanted both twins delivered on the bed, which I did not agree with as I had found pushing in that position impossible the first time around. Our views were very challenging to the obstetricians and some were quite aggressive about it, although I must say the head OB was more reasonable and was prepared to admit that my refusal to consent to an epidural would be a “complete contraindication” to giving me one! Throughout this stage our midwife was a pillar of strength and information. She gave us the courage of our convictions and more than once came to the hospital to talk with the obstetricians on our behalf. Even so, the hospital was very unhappy with our birth preferences. It was a stressful time, helped somewhat by a Calmbirth ® course.

In the end all our arguments ended up being moot. At 33 weeks, I started to feel an ominous itching all over. Tests showed elevated bile salts and poor liver function results. I had obstetric cholestasis. Our midwife and the hospital agreed: the babies would need to be delivered by 37 weeks. And I knew that that early, an induction would almost certainly involve Syntocinon.

This was really difficult for me to accept. I was terribly afraid of the drug, and knew that Synto would mean continuous monitoring and therefore limit my movement, which I also feared. However, I knew that my fear would make the delivery more difficult and the pain worse. At this point the hospital dropped the bombshell that despite all their delivery rooms having deep birthing baths, I would not be allowed to use those or the shower if I had to have Synto, as they believe this risks pump damage to the Synto pump. Essentially this meant I was walking into a labour that was likely to be more painful, with less pain relief options. It was going to be down to Calmbirth ® alone, if I wanted to avoid drugs (and I did!).

I did a lot of Calmbirth ® practice from then on. But the Calmbirth ® visualisation exercises presupposed a normal delivery without intervention, and I found it very upsetting to listen to them. I hit on the idea of doing my own visualisations, of a medicalised induction process. After a few of these I was able to work through some of my fears.

On the day of the induction, we kissed our daughter goodbye at 5am and met our midwife at the hospital. Preliminary checks showed a Bishop score of 5, very promising for 36 weeks. The hospital midwife applied prostaglandin gel and sent us out to freedom. We had a lovely breakfast. I started to have sporadic contractions but nothing serious. We returned to the hospital 6 hours later. My cervix had ripened to 2cm, and the very cheerful OB was able to break the waters for twin 1 (our second daughter) at 3.45pm. No meconium staining! I dared to ask the OB how she was presenting. ANTERIOR, WOOHOO! I was very pleased with that.

Contractions came rather more strongly after that point, but were still sporadic. The felt very “knifey”, and our midwife explained this was from the prostaglandin gel. We held off on the Synto as long as possible, but at 6.25pm the drip was put up and contractions started in earnest. Continuous monitoring was in place, but via telemetry so I could have moved. Ironically, though, I didn’t feel the need to. I went deep into calm breathing and spent most of the labour sitting beside the bed on a fit ball, sometimes circling my hips but more often just breathing to ride the contractions with my husband stroking my back. Unlike my first labour, I had no real idea of when the next contraction was coming, and ended up doing my calm breathing (in for 4, out for 6) solidly for hours. I wasn’t afraid of the contractions. I could really feel them doing their work, and little twin 1 moving firm and fast down. I was determined to “get out of the way” of labour and with each contraction focused on opening up and not clenching against the pain. Our midwife was convinced things were going quickly and asked us when we thought we would be having the babies. I told her anything before midnight was a sucker bet! She said 11pm.

At 8.30pm, about 2 hours after I started having regular contractions, the pain was starting to get BIG. The OB did a cervix check – I was 5cm. I was very disheartened by this, but our midwife told me that the first 5cm was the hardest, and the very encouraging OB tried to convince me that it wasn’t all about centimetres and that my cervix felt promisingly thin and stretchy. In hindsight, even in my first labour I dilated from 5 to 10cm in under an hour, so I should have known what was coming – but I didn’t!

Throughout this time I was not making any noise. The hospital’s midwife didn’t seem to think I was in established labour, and threatened to up the Synto dose to make the contractions “strong and regular”, even though they were already sufficient to dilate my cervix 3cm in under 2 hours. I managed to insist “no. more. Synto!” She reserved judgement, but it might have been the adrenaline kick I needed, as by 9.15pm I was having enormous contractions every 2-3 minutes. I could feel them as a giant swelling band of pain stretching around my whole belly and stretching lower. At this point I started vocalising “ah, ah, ah” throughout contractions, to help me ride the pain and stop me clenching down. I remember saying “if this isn’t transition, I’m in trouble!” I didn’t believe it could be transition, though – not so early, not when my first birth had taken almost 3 days. Our midwife said she thought we would have babies by 10pm, and I didn’t believe her.

I needed to get off the fit ball and change position, and asked if I could get on all fours, although the idea of moving seemed impossible to imagine. The hospital midwife set up a crash mat and a nice beanbag for me to lean on. I leaned forward and within one contraction of moving had started making some amazing noises. Unlike my “ah ah ahs” they were completely involuntary. And then I could feel twin 1 crowning. I did not believe it had happened so quickly, and cried out “what’s happening?” Everyone still makes fun of me for this. She was born in only a couple of pushes at 9.25pm, and our midwife had to tell the hospital midwife to put her gloves on to catch her. Our beautiful daughter, with a lovely round head, pink skin and a great big yell! There is a photo of me still on all fours, with a blissed-out grin. I could not believe how easy and quick it had been. I got to hold her straight away, but contractions started up again quite quickly, and she went to her daddy for some skin to skin time.

At this point the obstetricians arrived – a registrar and resident. I wanted to stay on the floor, but the registrar managed to persuade me up on the bed to check twin 2′s position, as we knew he was breech. Contractions started up again within minutes and were really agonising now, as I had lost my Calmbirth focus and as the position (twin 2′s spine to mine) had that sort of posterior feeling to it. But within seconds I was again feeling the inexorable urge to push. The OB flicked twin 2′s feet out as he was in a squatting position, the midwife and OB flexed twin 2′s head by pushing on my stomach and with a few mighty pushes he was out too, at 9.39pm. Our son! He was handed to me but unlike J, had a bit of trouble breathing, and spent some time in the special care nursery. He was back to us almost before we knew it. I must say he had a very breech-looking head, which looked like a mighty frown, but he’s ever so handsome and cheerful now.

J weighed in at 2.98kg (I was really ticked off she could not stretch to the extra 20gm), and P weighed 3.06kg, excellent weights for 36 weekers, let alone twins!

After twin 2 was out, I lost all patience for the pain – rather a pity as the Synto kept getting ramped up to deliver the placentas and then to deal with my uterus which did not want to shrink back down. I ended up with a Synto drip all night. I tell people this birth was meant to help me deal with my fear of Synto once and for all.

Both babies had beautiful breastfeeds within an hour or two of birth, which sadly was not an omen of things to come for twin 1, but it was lovely.


Anyway, that was our birth. Twins born without any pain relief (not even hot water) or really any intervention other than the induction drugs, with 4 hours of contractions total and only about 2 of those active labour. It wasn’t the birth I had wanted but it was a wonderful experience and very healing after my first daughter’s birth. I am so proud of myself, and look back on the birth with amazed gratitude all the time.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Labour induction methods compare favourably

Link

… a method of inducing labour that dates back to the 1930s “has been found to work as well as modern treatments but with fewer side effects”.

The news is based on a large Dutch trial that examined inducing labour using of a simple mechanical device, called a Foley catheter. Researchers tested the device against the use of hormone gels designed to trigger contractions. The study … found that both techniques led to similar rates of spontaneous vaginal deliveries, instrumental deliveries … and women requiring a caesarean section.

The Foley catheter also seemed to lead to fewer side effects in the women and their babies, although using the method of induction … led to longer labours …

Current guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend the use of hormone gels for induction of labour, but not the routine use of mechanical devices for induction … This new, relatively large trial has shown no important differences between the two methods used in these women. It is possible that the mechanical technique might find a place for women where there may be risks from using hormone gel …

… a high proportion of induced labours are performed because a woman’s cervix is not ready for the birth and does not open appropriately.

This randomised controlled trial compared two methods for inducing birth in women who had single babies and a reason to be induced. The women were either induced using mechanical means (a Foley catheter) or with application of a hormone gel into the vagina. A Foley catheter is a mechanical device that helps open the cervix. A fluid-filled balloon is inflated in the cervix, which stretches it until it is at an appropriate size to allow birth. The prostaglandin hormone gel mimics the natural mechanism by which a woman’s hormones cause the cervix to open.

The researchers say that hormonal induction has become the method of choice in several countries, but that use of the Foley catheter may result in similar numbers of successful inductions without the need for a caesarean section. They also say that the Foley catheter induction may have several advantages over hormone methods, such as not causing “over-stimulation” of the birthing processes …

… the caesarean section rates were much the same between the two groups: 23% of women who had been induced using a Foley catheter required a caesarean section compared to 20% of the women induced using the hormone gel … Likewise, a similar number of women in each group needed extra mechanical help with the birth, such as the use of forceps (11% in the Foley catheter group and 13% in the hormone gel group).

A greater number of women induced with the Foley catheter required a caesarean because they failed to progress in the first stage of birth (12%) than the hormone gel group (8%) … Similar proportions of each group had a caesarean section because their baby was becoming distressed (7% in the Foley catheter group compared to 9% in the hormone gel group).

… Fewer women in the prostaglandin hormone group (59%) needed an additional hormone called oxytocin to stimulate uterus contractions than in the Foley catheter group (86%). The time from the start of induction to birth was on average 29 hours (range 15-35 hours) in the Foley catheter group and 18 hours (range 12-33 hours) in the hormone gel group.

The groups did not differ in terms of painkillers taken, haemorrhage, overstimulation or health status of the baby. Fewer babies delivered with the Foley catheter (12%) needed to be admitted to the general ward (not an intensive care ward) than those induced using hormones (20%). More women treated with the hormone gel (3%) had suspected infections during birth compared to those induced with Foley catheter (1%) …

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Medicare-funded midwifery care: What you need to know

I am an eligible midwife. This means that my private patients can claim some of the cost of private midwifery care, much the same way we do when we see a GP. As well as Medicare benefits, some private health funds will provide benefits for childbirth education with a midwife, and costs may also be claimed through tax as a medical expense (more on that one from your Accountant). Medicare benefits and tax benefits combined are between $2,500 and $3,300. This means that care with an eligible midwife will be up to $3,300 cheaper than care with a non-eligible private midwife.

What is a Medicare-Eligible Midwife?

In order to claim Medicare benefits from care with your midwife, you will need to ensure that your midwife is eligible. An eligible midwife meets certain advanced requirements of a registration standard:

  • Current general registration as a midwife in Australia with no restrictions on practice;
  • Midwifery experience that constitutes the equivalent of 3 years full time post initial registration as a midwife;
  • Current competence to provide pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care to women and babies;
  • Successful completion of an approved professional practice review program for midwives working across the continuum of midwifery care;
  • 40 hours per year of continuing professional development relating to the continuum of midwifery care (20 hours in addition to standard requirements);
  • Pregnancy care:

    45-60 minute consultations in your home or in my clinic

  • Childbirth education
  • Continuity of carer
  • Medicare benefits
  • Obstetric back-up
  • Birth in hospital – or at home

    Continue your care with the same midwife you know and trust, with specialist obstetric back-up readily available

    Postnatal care

  • Consultations in your home and / or my rooms
  • Medicare benefits
  • Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    First-time mums learn the hard way: informed mums choose private midwives

    A recent article has suggested that first-time mums have overly unrealistic ideas about their birth – that it will be a natural, uncomplicated birth, when in reality it is not, for the majority. We know that women choosing care through the general hospital system will experience high rates of interventions, leading ultimately to a caesarean. But few women know that if they engage a private midwife for a hospital or homebirth, they will experience much lower rates of intervention, but with the same level of safety. Care with an eligible private midwife will attract medicare benefits, and obstetric care is readily available if it is needed. The article below described one woman’s experience of general hospital care. I can only assume that this reporter has written the article in response to the outcry about the original research.

    HERVEY Bay first-time mum Jasmine Adame has experienced first-hand just how difficult childbirth can be.

    And she agrees with new research … that suggests that many first-time mums are unprepared for the realities of a complicated labour.

    Jasmine delivered her little girl … at Hervey Bay Hospital after spending a day and a half in labour.

    In the end, she was told her labour had stalled and she had to have an emergency caesarean.

    We are not told how long labour stalled for, whether she had her own midwife with her throughout her labour (unlikely since this is not available to most women through the general hospital system) and we are also not told how far through her labour she was. It is true that some caesareans are performed for “failure to progress” when the woman’s cervix is less than 3 centimeters dilated, indicating that she is not yet in established labour.

    Jasmine had attended antenatal classes prior to having her first child and said it was the midwives who held these classes who gave her the best idea of what labour was actually going to be like.

    Hospital classes are great at telling women about hospital policies, but independent childbirth education will inspire women with confidence about what their bodies are capable of, with the right support.

    “I knew it wasn’t going to be fun.

    “But I didn’t expect it to be as horrid as it was,” she said.

    It sounds like she didn’t have the care of a midwife who was known and trusted. Most women I work with will experience their labour extremely positively, as if it was the best (hardest and most challenging, but oh so rewarding) experience of their life.

    … The chances of having a medically uncomplicated birth were actually 21%.

    This applies to women birthing in the general hospital system, where they will not be cared for by one midwife who is known to them, chosen by them and trusted by them. The chance of a medically uncomplicated birth when a woman chooses private midwifery care is around 70% – 80%. This is a huge difference.

    Because she had been focused on a natural delivery, the decision to deliver the baby by caesarean took Jasmine by surprise – and the time between the decision and the birth was very swift, allowing her little time to adjust …

    This is addressed during care with a private midwife, where there is ample time to explore all options and possibilities, so that there are few surprises on the day (or night!). Hour-long appointments allow plenty of time for questions and education. The possibility of a first-time mum “needing” a caesarean in the general hospital system is 25%, or one in four. Given this large minority, we would think that all women going through the hospital system would be thoroughly appraised of this possibility. In my private practice, a mere 3% first-time mums need a caesarean. This is not because we push the boundaries of safety: it is because women who are well supported, well-informed, relaxed and confident about their birth will generally start labour on their own at term, labour normally and birth their babies unassisted by any instruments or operations.

    Hopefully Jasmine will choose private midwifery care with her next pregnancy (private midwifery care is available for a planned hospital birth), where she can expect an 80% – 90% chance of a vaginal birth following her caesarean in her first pregnancy. Or will she choose to go back to the general hospital system, where she has a mere 15% chance of a vaginal birth?

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage

    Link

    No previous study has focused on true physiological third stage for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Physiological third stage is often chosen by women who birth at home or in a birth centre, however hospital policies urge active management of the third stage (injection of syntocinon, immediate clamping and cutting of the cord and then pulling the placenta out) because studies have shown that this form of management reduces bleeding. However, it is unfortunate that those studies have either a) not clearly defined physiological management or b) have not managed the “physiological” third stages in a physiological manner. Hence, those studies have shown that active management is the safer option and hospitals have gone with those recommendations.

    This study clearly defines what is meant by physiological management and also the women who are suitable for physiological management. Some women are at a higher risk of PPH and so active management was recommended to those women in the study.

    The study compared active management which was standard at the tertiary hospital, with physiological management which was the norm at the free-standing birth centre. At the tertiary unit, 11.2% low-risk women experienced a PPH. At the midwifery-led unit, where physiological management was practiced, PPH only occurred in 2.8% women. Active management was associated with 11.5% PPHs compared with physiological management which was 1.7% PPHs. Active management was associated with a seven to eight fold increase in PPH for low-risk women.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Do first-time mothers have unrealistic views about having uncomplicated births, or does the health system fail them?

    An interesting report in The Telegraph states that first-time mums have unrealistic expectations of drug-free, natural, uncomplicated births, when in reality, they have a mere 21% chance of:

  • a labour that starts on its own (ie, is not induced
  • not using an epidural
  • birthing without the use of instruments or operations
  • If we exclude from that figure the proportion of women who also birth without stitches, that figure becomes a mere 8%. The papers would like us to believe that

    first-time mothers have unrealistic views about having uncomplicated births, increasing the risk of post-natal depression

    In other words, postnatal depression is caused by womens’ unmet and unrealistic expectations of an uncomplicated birth.

    The suggests that health system has no part to play in this. It is merely a case of women wanting too much from their experience. If we expect too much, we set ourselves up for disappointment, and this leads to postnatal depression!

    Wow!

    The article goes on to say that

    expectant mothers … believe there is a 56.2 per cent chance of an uncomplicated birth, which means a baby being born without the use of forceps, suction cups, caesarean section or induced labour.

    Whereas

    the chance of having a medically uncomplicated birth is 21 per cent.

    A further 30.7 per cent said they believed women would have uncomplicated births without needing sutures. The actual figure is 8 per cent.

    My readers will well know that I don’t subscribe to the view that a crappy birth experience and postnatal depression is all the fault of the health service; but at the same time, it’s not all the fault of the woman either.

    We’re each responsible for the choices we make and for informing ourselves of all available options before we make a choice. Health services are also responsible for accurately representing their services and outcomes so that women can make a considered choice. If women have a mere 8% chance of birthing normally and without stitches, that needs to be well-known so that women may seek other care options if they so choose.

    The health system is here to provide a basic and safe level of care. If we expect or desire more than what can be considered “basic”, then we do need to look into other options, and these will generally be found in the private system, be it private midwifery care or private obstetric care (although I dare say that the average private obstetrician will have lower rates of normal birth that a public service).

    All of that said, it seems appalling that 79% first-time Mums go through the public system and come out the other side with an intervened-with birth. In my private practice, those figures are reversed. Do women know what they are signing up for when the choose their local hospital for care? And perhaps more importantly, should the hospitals be held to account for these poor outcomes, or at least acknowledge that they are failing women?

    Most first-time mums should expect to birth without intervention. Most should not need any intervention. The birthing process is a normal, natural, female bodily function. We don’t question the potential for our bodies to ovulate, urinate, digest food, menstruate, circulate blood, metabolise substances and so on. These processes generally “work”; birth generally “works” too. Provided we, as care providers, don’t mess it up with unnecessary interventions and an environment that is not conducive to labouring and birthing a baby.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    An amazing homebirth story

    Isabel is an amazing, strong woman who came to me for pregnancy care. She had planned to move overseas, and as you’ll read, her pregnancy came as a surprise. She planned a homebirth with a midwife overseas – but the story has a twist in it! We went about the pregnancy, preparing thoroughly for an active, natural and drug-free birth. I was thrilled to receive Isabel’s birth story, and she has kindly agreed to share it here.

    Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home. Now it is my turn to write the story I have been so looking forward to… I hope I help inspire another mum-to-be to have the great confidence in her own ability and her body’s ability to birth her baby safely and naturally…love Isabel xx

    Our beautiful birth story of baby Zachary by Isabel and Jed

    It started in mid-April when I noticed an unusual change in my body. I pee-ed my pants when I sneezed. Even though I have a very weak bladder control and recurrent cystitis I had never done that before. I decided to get a urine test and after 4 weak positives I decided the product was defective and I needed to go see a real doctor tomorrow.
    Half way through a busy day at work as a Veterinarian, caring for animals, it hit me that I might be pregnant and that we weren’t really ready for this big change in our lives. I broke down and cried. I left work early to go see the doctor. Jed met me at the clinic and we saw the doctor together. The doctor promptly told me, “My Dear, there isn’t such a thing as false positive results. Only false negative are possible. You ARE pregnant!”

    I guess at that point both Jed and I had a lot of conflicting feelings. We had only just gotten married less than a month ago. We had a wedding dinner to attend in Malaysia followed by a honeymoon which required us to trek over 4000km up a mountain. At the same time it was such a big surprise and blessing to know that we were able to have a baby. We both set about sorting through our feelings and thoughts for a couple of weeks before letting the rest of the family and friends know about it.

    It was a smooth pregnancy and we had amazing help and support from friends and family. We learnt so much from our lovely midwife, Melissa Maimann and our ante natal teacher, Julie Clarke. It was basically life changing. I had known I would have needed to hit the books for this but who would have thought I find so much conflicting information. It was hard making the right choices. It was doubly hard to not have my sisters around which I rely on so much for guidance. Jed was so good and read everything I told him to. I only had to chuck temper tantrums once a month. =)

    In the end, I decided I wanted to have a home birth because I dislike being told what to do with regards to my body and I strongly dislike needles. I spent a lot of time visualising what my ideal birth/labour would be like and tried to get the support network I needed to achieve this dream. It wasn’t easy finding medical people to agree so in the end I realised it would probably just be Jed, Alicia and my mom helping me. I prayed to whoever was listening that everything would go smoothly and I that neither Zachary or I would not need medical help.

    Fast forward about 9 months to December, my mucus plug came out throughout the day on the 13th with no signs of labour. So we decided to head over to the homeopath for back up help if needed to get the contractions going.
    Almost a week later, on the 22nd of December my waters broke at 2am. It was such a surreal feeling as I sneezed and wet the bed. I was surprised at how wet the bed was and decided to stand up and this big gush of clear warm water ran down my legs. I then realised that my waters had broken and that I would be meeting my baby today.
    I woke Jed up and told him the news. Since there were no signs of contractions once again I decided to take the homeopathic remedy and we both went back to sleep.

    By 4am, I was uncomfortable enough to wake up and walk around. I emptied my bowels multiple times and drank lots of water and ate some fruit. At 5am I woke Jed up and told him to pump up the exercise ball and warm up the heat packs. By 6am, contractions were regular and about 15 minutes apart, Jed started filling up the bath tub. However, there was no hot water because the water heater had been turned off. So off he woke mom up to take over comforting me and went to boil many many pots of water.

    I sat on the bathroom floor rocking on the exercise ball and constantly visualising a soft open cervix and my baby descending nicely. I breathed nicely through each contraction remember our Calmbirth classes.
    Heat packs placed on the lower back and under the belly helped with the discomfort as well.
    The exercise ball was good for sleeping and resting on between contractions. Around 7 o’clock the bath tub was finally ready, got in and felt lots better. Alicia came shortly after and took over from mom. She gave awesome back rubs and was such a grounding energy which was exactly what I needed to get things done. Things went quickly after that.

    Jed got into the water around 8am and I knelt down with my arms wrapped around him. Contractions were about 5 minutes apart then and required a lot more attention. I kept reminding myself that each contraction meant one step closer to seeing Zachary. I felt him slowly pressing down on my cervix and my cervix dilating.
    Vocalising helped during the contractions. Jed was a great help reminding me to breathe and not hold my breath.
    He was like a rock I knew I could rely on. Did a few self vaginal exams and could feel Zachary’s head progressing downwards.
    At about 8.20am I realised I was in transition, his head was crowning and I wasn’t fully dilated. Was upset and freaked out but Alicia reminded me to trust in my body. Took a deep breath and focused on opening my cervix up. A few minutes later I was ready to push, Zachary came out head first with a hand. I rested for a few seconds till the next contractions came and looked up at Jed and said “Are you ready? He is coming.” Jed caught Zachary Francis McKenna at 8.38am
    We were both ecstatic and sat there admiring for a while. He started crying almost immediately and looked around at all of us.
    Stood up and tried to birth placenta but couldn’t so I went back to the room. He started feeding soon after and I was enjoying his skin to skin contact. The doctor arrived soon after he advised us to clamp the cord and get the placenta out.
    Jed was frantic and really wanted the placenta out because he was worried about bleeding. I was getting a little annoyed by his constant fussing. We clamped the cord and Jed cut it. The doctor applied gentle traction and got the placenta out. Finally we were left alone for some quiet time.

    I would like to thank my lovely husband for supporting me through the pregnancy and birth and agreeing to a home birth and studying so hard.
    I would also like to thank Melissa and Julie for their teachings which allowed me to have the confidence to do this, although neither of them endorsed free birthing they were not judgmental.

    No amount of thank you can express my gratitude for having Alicia around to show me there were many options and that we need to take charge of our own births.
    Many thanks to my Mom and Dad for allowing me to use their house. Last of all, Thank You to all the women out there who shared their birth stories and experiences which gave me to determination to birth at home.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Delivering better maternity care

    Link

    Despite countless inquiries, initiatives and ministerial pledges … maternity care remains one of the NHS’s problem areas …

    In recent weeks there have been two significant pieces of evidence published that will help shape practice affecting the UK’s 800,000 births a year. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced new guidelines for the NHS in England and Wales on the circumstances in which mothers-to-be should be able to have a Caesarean-section delivery.

    Meanwhile the landmark Birthplace study … sought to clarify the relative risks of having a baby at home, in hospital or in a birth centre run by midwives; the study found all settings carried a low level of risk. Both documents aim to advise maternity teams on how to give mothers and their babies the best possible experience.

    … It is no wonder maternity services are under pressure … England has had a 22% increase in births over the past decade …

    But the maternity workforce is not just short of midwives, the roundtable heard. Of those 800,000 annual births, 94% of them take place in hospitals where doctors are present along with midwives; the others, at home (2%) and in birth centres (4%), have midwives solely in charge. But the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) believes the 2,186 senior doctors working as consultants in that area of medicine is too few. It wants the NHS to boost numbers to 3,000-3,300.

    Mothers-to-be would benefit because every hospital maternity unit would have a consultant on hand 24/7 and less experienced doctors would no longer be in charge overnight and at weekends …

    … “the current system of maternity care is unsustainable. You have to reconfigure”. The participant meant that some maternity units should be closed – merged, in effect – so fewer, larger childbirth centres could offer mothers a better service, partly thanks to more specialist staff handling a greater number of deliveries concentrated in the same place.

    It makes little sense for large urban areas to have separate maternity units just a few miles apart, a view confirmed for the speaker by seeing that sort of setup on a recent visit to Leeds and nearby towns.

    Many health professionals support the concept of reorganisation. And the reconfiguration of neonatal care services in 2003, which led to fewer units dealing with sick babies but offering enhanced care, is a potential model to follow, another participant added. But there is a major obstacle to overcome first: … To close your core maternity service is a death trap as an MP. So that will not happen,” …

    … simply creating fewer, but larger, hospital units is not the answer and there needs to be more midwife-led birth centres, either standalone units or situated beside hospitals, in case a mother needs urgent medical attention …

    There was also a strong consensus that the huge proportion of births occurring in hospitals, 94%, is too high. While there was support for moving towards an equal split – 33% at home, 33% in birth centres and 33% in hospital – there was also a recognition that politics, entrenched attitudes and the tightest NHS budget in a generation means that will probably remain just an aspiration for the foreseeable future.

    … In 2007, Maternity Matters promised women in England a choice of birth place, but the reality is that many still do not get that. One participant working on the NHS frontline said pressure on maternity services was so great in some places that midwives who usually help women to have home births are having to work, instead, on labour wards, thus depriving those seeking a home birth of that supposedly guaranteed right.

    Similarly, surveys by the Healthcare Commission and its successor as the NHS regulator for England, the Care Quality Commission, have shown the promise to women of one-to-one care from a midwife during their labour is also not honoured for as many as a quarter of mothers-to-be, who are left alone and find it stressful …

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Midwives Use Rituals To Send Message That Women’s Bodies Know Best

    Link

    In reaction to what midwives view as the overly medicalized way hospitals deliver babies, they have created birthing rituals to send the message that women’s bodies know best.

    The midwife experience uses these rituals to send the message that home birth is about female empowerment, strengthening relationships between family and friends, and facilitating participatory experiences that put mothers in control, with the ultimate goal of safe and healthy deliveries less focused on technological intervention.

    These are some of the findings from an Oregon State University researcher and licensed midwife who witnessed more than 400 home births in order to document an extensive list of practices utilized by midwives to express the symbolic difference between home and hospital births.

    … “We know, for instance, that midwives have better health outcomes in some areas, such as reduced rates of surgical delivery and labor induction, than hospitals. But I wanted to examine how ritual might play a part in producing these positive health outcomes.”

    … evidence shows that hospital births result in about triple the rate of cesarean section for low-risk women compared to midwife-attended home births …

    What she found was a network of common practices, messages and beliefs that resulted in midwives constructing woman-centered rituals around pregnancy and birth that were set up in opposition to what they believe are the overly medicalized practices of hospitals.

    For instance … midwives conducted many of the same diagnostic procedures as a physician would prenatally, from blood pressure and weight checks to blood testing and fetal heart tone evaluation …

    … “Many midwives also downplayed the centrality of monitoring and resuscitation equipment setting them off to the side, or placing them under baby blankets during labor so women would not be reminded of the technology in the room. Mothers and babies were still monitored closely, but the monitoring was not made the central focus.”

    The differences aren’t so much in practice … but in performance.

    Cheyney also documented the use of common phrases to create birthing mantras. She lists phrases such as “don’t fight it,” “let your body do it,” “open,” and “let it be strong,” as key components … Many mothers … reported feeling strong and capable during their labors, and women who compared their hospital birth to their home birth reported feeling like they were “doing something, rather than just lying there passively waiting.” Midwives also commonly expressed the statement that they were simply “guardians,” and that women have all the tools inside of them to birth their own babies.

    … It is Cheyney’s belief that both of these sets of rituals have caused a wide chasm between … hospital births and the 1 percent who choose home births.

    “Just as women and their doctors who deliver in the hospital often feel convinced that their birth was the only safe and ‘correct’ way, women and midwives who deliver at home feel strongly that they have the solution,” … “They believe it with every cell in their body because they have lived it.”…

    There is definitely something special and unique about homebirth that cannot be summarised in words alone.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Simulator to predict chance of caesarean?

    Link

    Traditionally, doctors and midwives have used a technique called pelvimetry to measure the pelvis and try to determine its adequacy for giving birth. But pelvic size is just one factor in how smoothly labor will go, rendering the method largely insufficient.

    Scientists in France have been working to take some of the guesswork out of labor predictions … their newly developed software, called Predibirth, predicts birth outcomes quite accurately.

    The researchers used their software to process magnetic resonance images of 24 pregnant women, capturing the pelvis and fetus, and then simulating 72 possible trajectories the baby’s head might take through the birth canal. The program then uses this data to score the mother’s chances of having a normal (vaginal) birth.

    … Of the 24 women in the study, the 13 who delivered normally all had highly favorable birth outcome scores. Three women who had high-risk scores underwent elective C-sections. Of the five women who underwent emergency C-section, the three with obstructed labor had high-risk scores, and the two who experienced heart rhythm abnormalities had mildly favorable or favorable scores.

    More accurate measurements of labor risks might not only keep C-section rates lower and help identify necessary C-sections before they become emergencies, but these measurements could also better inform those who want to deliver at home whether it is safe to do so.

    I wonder if all of those women had undergone extensive preparation for birth and had sought continuity of midwifery care? Of 24 women, only 13 delivered vaginally. That is only 54%! Private midwifery care generally had rates of normal birth up around 90%.

    Visit my website to learn more about my services.

    Doctors claim homebirth risks ignored

    Link

    WA doctors have attacked a new policy for State Government-funded homebirths, saying it sidesteps serious concerns about the increased risk of newborn deaths.

    The draft document says women have a right to choose a home delivery at taxpayers’ expense provided they are at low risk of complications and give their consent.

    But women with risk factors such as a previous caesarean, obesity or a history of blood loss in childbirth should be excluded from publicly funded homebirths.

    … Australian Medical Association WA said the policy fudged serious concerns raised by former members of the committee, who found the risk of death in babies born at home was almost four times higher and called for funded homebirth to be banned.

    “Not only is the taxpayer entitled to think public monies are going to things that are evidence-based, if the evidence suggests it’s more dangerous they should have even greater concerns.” …

    The WA homebirth policy is a very considered and thorough document that supports low-risk homebirth for women who are attended by experienced midwives with a back-up hospital booking and obstetric consultation. Unfortunately the doctors quoted in the above article seem to have mixed their research. Studies clearly demonstrate that low-risk homebirth is at least as safe as hospital birth, and with fewer interventions for mothers in labour. It is high risk homebirth that is associated with excess perinatal mortality and this is not supported under the WA policy, or any other publicly-funded homebirth programs.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Turbulent times

    A lot has been happening in the world of homebirth and midwifery. Many will have read the articles about homebirth, freebirth, midwives and maternity care that are appearing in our papers on a daily basis.

    I have not posted for a couple of weeks now, for three main reasons: one I have been really busy with my practice which has not been this busy for about two years. Second, I attended the Australian College of Midwives National Conference – the ACM worked really hard to deliver an excellent conference that was appreciated by all. I had the fantastic opportunity to meet midwives from around Australia and share ideas, discuss practice and talk birthy things. I was pleased that the conference was in Sydney, because as those of you who know me will know, in my non-midwifery life I rescue and care for injured and orphaned native birds, and so I was able to make a trip home most days of the conference to feed everyone at home. They were hungry but they all survived! I digress. The third reason for not posting was that the recent issues have made me re-assess things like responsibility, accountability, safety, choice, control, autonomy, beneficence, informed decision-making and many other issues. I have no answers to report. Just lots of reflection.

    Midwifery and maternity care are going through turbulent times and as professionals and organisations, I feel that we have done a major disservice to women that they feel safer birthing at home – with or without a registered midwife – in the presence of risk factors – because they so strongly believe that the hospital system will not enable them to birth in the manner of their choosing. It is a sad reflection on the health system and the professionals who work within it. Women who cannot access midwifery care because they are planning a VBAC. Women who are told that if they insist on birthing vaginally with twins, they must accept continuous monitoring, induction, epidural and birth in stirrups for twin two. Women whose only option is to birth in a hospital that is two hours from their home. We have all heard the stories.

    My biggest disappointment is the lack of midwife admitting rights. We are one year into the maternity reforms on November 1 this year. We have eligible midwives with Medicare provider numbers, ordering tests and working with doctors to provide safe care to women and babies – yet we cannot access hospitals to provide this care. I well understand that there are a lot of hurdles to be overcome with midwife admitting rights, and life has taught me that nothing in life is impossible.

    The release of the homebirth position statement – which I fully support as an evidence-based and safe way to provide care – combined with the lack of midwife admitting rights, is disastrous for women and midwives. Higher risk women are forced into a position of birthing in hospital without their midwife if the midwife complies with the position statement but has no admitting rights – otr else freebirthing, potentially with disastrous consequences. Overnight, this change occurred and women are fuming.

    It is impossible to believe, but an eligible midwife who crosses all the “T”s and dots all the “I”s will suffer incredibly in terms of restriction of clientele, however if she were to remove her name from the register – something that I understand is very easy to do – she may do just as she pleases with no accountability, regulation or practice standards. Midwives are placed in the untenable situation of a dwindling practice, or unregistering and having a flourishing practice. Until admitting rights are in place, midwives will have no place to birth with their higher-risk clients. This situation does not see the Government supporting midwives or women. It is creating a disaster.

    The various politics of homebirth and midwifery has created an enormous rift between midwives. It seems that there are the bunch who have elected to become eligible, forge ahead with collaborative arrangements, push for admitting rights and accept the increased regulation that is upon us as our profession matures. The other group opposes the increased regulation and restriction of choice, supports midwife- (or non-midwife)-attended homebirth for any woman who wants it and really wants things to just go back to how they used to be, before insurance became mandatory. Many midwives sit comfortable in the middle of this debate. It is sad to watch such division and animosity amongst midwives. We seem to lack a capacity of saying, “We don’t share each other’s vision and we have made different choices, but we are midwives and we will support each other”. As one midwife said to me, “We are each doing the best we can for the women we care for and we’re making the best of a rotten situation”.

    I know 2012 will be better than 2011. Who knows? Maybe it’ll be an historic year where for the very first time, women will birth on their own terms, with their chosen midwife, at home or in hospital. I wonder how many women will insist on homebirth in spite of significant risks, if they are able to birth in hospital with their own midwife and in the manner of their choosing.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Natural birth in hospital?

    Here are some ideas to birth naturally in hospital:

    Read, read, read. Books, websites, any written info from your care provider … read it all. You also need to know the difference between facts presented to you in an honest and unbiased way, and facts that are being filtered through hospital policy. This is where women benefit from having a private midwife by their side.

    For example, “Some risks rise slightly when a woman has high blood pressure. I am uncomfortable with letting your pregnancy continue with high blood pressure because of the risks to the baby and to you if something happens” is an honest and factual statement. You have the right to accept the risks and refuse induction. However, some women hear “I’m going to induce you today because if we don’t do this now, there is a good chance your baby will not make it”. This statement is dishonest, using a woman’s fears and her maternal instinct to encourage her to accept intervention. There is also no discussion of alternative options. Informed consent requires that women are presented with options so that they can make the best decision for them, in their situation.

    Be assertive As with most human relationships, a great deal can be resolved with a calm, respectful and firm manner. Know what you want and why you want it. Engage a private midwife to assist you with obtaining relevant and impartial information.

    Listen. If you are choosing to use a hospital and an obstetrician for your birth, then you acknowledge that their presence, education and experience have some value. Your wishes are important but be willing to listen even when what’s being said is really not what you want to hear. You must also acknowledge that an obstetrician is trained in all things that go wrong, and they are on the look-out for any sign of things going wrong. Midwives, on the other hand, will promote normalcy and assist your pregnancy and birth to remain normal. These differing philosophies do result in big differences in intervention rates.

    Be Flexible. Understand that sometimes things don’t go the way we had planned. There might be some occasions where you’ll be happy to accommodate the hospital policy, and other times when you’ll want to stand your ground.

    Ultimately, it is true that the most important aspect of birth is safety and a healthy mother and baby. But that doesn’t mean the other aspects are unimportant, and I firmly believe you can have a great birth – and a safe birth – in any location.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Preparing for a Natural Birth

    In society today, there is a great focus on pain in labour birth, with the assumption that women cannot handle the pain of labour and that women need medical assistance in the form of an epidural or drugs to get through. Many women go to hospital saying, “well, I’d like a natural birth, but I’ll go with the flow”.

    Even with today’s technology, birth comes with pain most of the time. Even for those women who are sure they want an epidural, they will still feel some pain as epidurals are given once labour is established, after 4cm dilation. There is usually pain / discomfort to get to that point.

    And once women get to 4cm, the last 6 are usually much faster and easier to get through. That’s because our bodies are designed to release natural pain relief that helps with the later stages of labour.

    The best thing is to learn techniques for managing the sensations of labour, to feel well prepared for labour and birth.

    When preparing for a natural birth, most women feel better informed – and therefore relaxed – if they have read a lot about labour and birth. Women who are well-informed about the process of birth, the options available to them and what they can expect, are generally more accepting of the sensations of labour. They are not fearful because they know what to expect and what might happen next.

    It’s a great idea to read other women’s birth stories – positive and negative – to give a balanced view of what happens, what is possible and what you might like for your own labour.

    Independent childbirth education is excellent for teaching women in an unbiased way about all the options available to them.

    Calmbirth is another fantastic tool for assisting with natural birth.

    It’s essential to be surrounded with positive messages about birth. Try to limit contact with people who are skeptical and judgmental of your plans for a natural birth. Don’t let people discourage you or tell you birth horror stories. If you expect it to be terrible, it will be.

    Think about what you want your birth to be like. Make a birth plan, detailing what you’d like for your labour, birth and postnatal period. Show it to your midwife or doctor and get their agreement to help you achieve that birth that’s right for you.

    Of course, birth plans are always flexible and we understand that sometimes they need to be modified and that’s ok. A birth plan is just that – a plan. It’s not set in concrete and women can change it at any stage.

    Watch DVDs on natural birth. See, hear, read and talk about natural birth. Focus on becoming the healthiest person you can be with great nutrition and a firm exercise program. Women who are physically fit and well-nourished often have easier labours.

    Finally, your choice of care provider is also worth considering. Do you know the midwife who will be caring for you in labour? Would you like to know the midwife who’ll be caring for you? Women who are well supported in continuity of carer programs such as private midwifery care are far more likely to rate their labour and birth experience as being positive and satisfying.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Private midwife at public hospital

    Our local newspaper wrote an article about the model of care I am able to offer women:

    THE owner of Essential Birth Consulting at Bexley, Melissa Maimann, 33, has become the first private midwife in Sydney to be accredited to deliver babies in a public hospital.

    She said this was exciting news for expectant mums who want a personalised delivery but might be experiencing a high-risk pregnancy.

    Ms Maimann said her model of care was unique in Australia because it included access to a back-up obstetrician.

    “I am able to support women with risk-associated pregnancies because obstetric care is available,” she said. “This is a real benefit to women as often those with high-risk pregnancies are limited to obstetric care with little, if any, midwifery input.”

    Ms Maimann, who established Essential Birth Consulting five years ago, has helped deliver about 76 babies.

    She was profiled in the Leader last December for becoming the first private midwife in St George to receive accreditation to provide Medicare-funded private midwifery services. This has equated to savings of about $2500 a client.

    Ms Maimann limits bookings to an average of two births each month to ensure a high quality service for families. She supports natural births, including water birth, and vaginal birth after caesarean, vaginal twin and vaginal breech births.

    “We know that continuity of care is the single most important factor for women in the pregnancy and birth care and I am proud to offer it,” she said.

    “Women may have care conveniently in their home or in my Bexley clinic.”

    There were 295,700 registered births in Australia in 2009, Australian Bureau of Statistics figures showed.

    Details: 0400 418 448 or essentialbirthconsulting.com.au

    6 essential tips for a natural birth

    Choosing a natural birth can be the most empowering and transformational experience in a woman’s life. In our culture, childbirth is viewed as a medical event and an emergency waiting to happen. We only have to turn on the TV and we witness birth being portrayed as a major emergency, and thank goodness those doctors were there to save the mother and baby.

    As well as this, when we ask our mothers about their births, we’re bound to hear more horror stories. Forceps, stirrups, the dreaded episiotomy. Shaves, enemas, being bound to bed, not allowed to get up, let alone even sit up. Nothing to eat or drink. Husbands were not present. Is it any wonder that we are so fearful of birth?

    Fear guides many birth experiences and results in the overuse of interventions and medications. As a result many women feel out of control and dis-empowered by their birth experience. It doesn’t have to be that way.

    When you take responsibility for the outcome of your birth experience by becoming educated, exploring all your options, consciously choosing and creating what you want, and taking the right steps to prepare yourself, you ultimately will transform yourself and your family.

    The following suggestions are designed to help you prepare to have the best birth experience possible:

    1. Understand and trust the process of birth
    If you understand what is happening with your body during labour, you will have more confidence and a better ability to cope. Trusting the process and knowing that everything is as it should be, is the key to “letting go” and allowing birth to happen normally and naturally. But before you can trust, you have to know what to expect. Seeking out independent childbirth education classes is the key.

    2. Good nutrition
    Good nutrition is essential to good health. The food we put in our mouths today will build the cells of tomorrow. In pregnancy, the food we eat also builds our baby, so we have an added responsibility to ensure that nutrition is optimal.

    3. Exercise
    Birth is a physical event. Staying fit can minimise pregnancy discomforts and ease the birth process. Walking or swimming and prenatal yoga are very beneficial to the health of you and your baby.

    4. Relax
    The key to dealing with labour is your ability to relax. Your body instinctively knows what to do and releases hormones that help you cope in labour. It is when you become scared or tense, that you interfere with the natural process and pain increases. Relaxation takes concentration and practice. I recommend Calmbirth to all women who plan a natural birth.

    5. Address fears and concerns
    We are constantly bombarded with negative images and stories of childbirth. Over time these messages can become ingrained in our way of thinking. It is important to recognise our attitudes and beliefs and understand how they shape our experiences. Any negative thoughts or beliefs about childbirth should be explored prior to giving birth.

    6. Care provider

    Your choice of care provider has a great impact on the sort of birth you will have, despite points 1 – 5 above. Having strong support throughout pregnancy and birth is critical in positively influencing the outcome of your experience. Interview and select your care provider to ensure a good “fit”. Consider engaging a private midwife to maximise your chance of a natural birth, if this is your aim. If you do not feel supported, make the necessary changes no matter how far along you are in your pregnancy.

    Birth is natural and women have done it for centuries. But in today’s society, a birth without preparation may not be the one you envisioned. You have all the resources available to help you prepare for the birth experience you desire. You can choose to become empowered by your birth experience or you can give your power away. It’s up to you.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    I’m pregnant. Who should I go to for care? A Midwife or an Obstetrician?

    Private Midwife:

  • Provides autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care for women who are experiencing normal, healthy pregnancies
  • Provides care in consultation with an obstetrician when a woman’s pregnancy has risk factors (eg high blood pressure, prem labour, concern for baby’s growth, gestational diabetes etc)
  • Transfers responsibility for care to an obstetrician if complications emerge and continues to provide care within the midwifery scope of practice
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Private Obstetrician:

  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Receives referrals from midwives for women with risk-associated pregnancies or births
  • Always provides labour and birth care (including caesarean) in collaboration with a midwife
  • Obstetric care on average results in a high degree of intervention such as induction, epidural, caesarean and episiotomy
  • Provides brief in-hospital consultations after the baby is born, followed by a 6-week check
  • Pregnancy appointments are generally no more than 15 minutes in duration
  • Collaborative care: private midwife and private obstetrician

  • Receive autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care from one midwife and one obstetrician regardless of risk factors
  • No transfer of care if risk factors emerge
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Supports women to birth naturally, including with twins, a breech baby or a VBAC
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Hospital births continuing through our service

    Given the troubled times for midwives attending hospitals in a birth support role – either for planned hospital birth or in a homebirth transfer situation – I have had many calls from current clients and women who are exploring their birthing options, asking if hospital births are still going ahead through this service. I wanted to provide reassurance that yes, my hospital birth service is continuing! I am continuing to take bookings for hospital birth and I am able to attend hospital births in the full capacity of a midwife.

    Owing to an ongoing collaborative agreement and hospital arrangements, hospital births are continuing. Women book with me early in their pregnancy and have all of their care with me. Women also see an obstetrician twice in their pregnancy. Birthing takes place in a hospital setting complete with waterbirthing. We support VBAC, twin and breech births. It is an all-risk model too, so women don’t need to be “low risk” to benefit from continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. It also means that there is no “transfer” if a woman’s pregnancy becomes high risk: she can still receive the same wonderful care and support from her chosen midwife and obstetrician.

    Hospital staff are not routinely involved in the care of women who book through our service and we have gone to great lengths to create a birth centre feel to the birthing rooms. Rooms are quiet, warm and peaceful and we have a variety of tools available to support natural, active birthing such as floor mats, bath, shower and birth balls and of course many women also choose to bring personal items from home.

    After the baby is born, we support early discharge with many women choosing to go home four hours after the birth. Of course women may stay longer if they wish. I visit daily for the first week, twice in the second week and then weekly until discharge at 6 weeks.

    Should there be any issues along the way, we have ready access to a specialist obstetrician who is known to the woman from pregnancy.

    So the short answer is YES! I am able to continue to attend hospital births and am receiving many calls about the popular model of care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Well-off mothers spend thousands on private midwives

    An article
    from the UK explains that women are spending thousands of pounds on private midwives to achieve the ‘perfect’ birth. The situation is not too different to the Australian experience.

    In the UK, private midwives charge between £1,800 and £5,000 for a birth, but their services are in high demand from professional, well-educated women who have become disenchanted with the hospital experience. The number of mothers paying for private midwives to attend home births has tripled in the last eight years.

    Demand has become so high in parts of London and the South East that some expectant mothers have been unable to find a private midwife to assist them.

    Many of the expectant mothers are older and have been put off by previous experiences in NHS maternity wards.

    Women who engage private midwives claim they can form a relationship with one person rather than seeing a succession of strangers.

    Midwives understand that women want continuity of care and someone to talk to them and answer their questions. Women don’t want routine and unnecessary interventions in their pregnancy and birth, and they want more extensive postnatal care.

    The Australian experience is the same as that in the UK. Women seek private midwifery care for home birth or hospital birth so that they can form a relationship with one person who will be with them from their first antenatal appointment, through to birth and 6 weeks after their baby is born.

    In Australia, eligible midwives can provide medicare-funded care which makes private midwifery care more affordable to women, thanks to the maternity reforms.

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Homebirth Position Statement

    The Australian College of Midwives (ACM) is Australia’s professional body for midwives. Recently, ACM was charged with the task of preparing a position statement on home birth. This position statement will have a great impact on the future of home birth services in Australia, so it is of enormous significance to home birthing women and their midwives. As well as a position statement, ACM has developed a Guidance which clarifies the expectations for private midwives when providing midwifery care for a planned homebirth.

    The documents are:
    Literature Review
    Homebirth position statement
    Guidance for private midwives attending homebirths

    Probably the best way to read these documents is to start with the literature review because it provides the context for the guidance and position statement.

    ACM’s literature review was restricted to studies which met all of the following criteria:

  • Studies of planned homebirths with a registered provider/s, compared with planned hospital birth
  • Research articles that also addressed maternal and neonatal outcomes
  • Articles from developed countries, written in English and with a publication date between 1995 and 2011.
  • Any articles that did not describe studies which included a comparison group, investigate planned homebirths or relate to maternal and/or neonatal outcomes were excluded. This rigorous process identified eleven studies which formed the basis of the literature review. The review covered 352,655 homebirths from Australia and around the world.

    In general terms, the studies say that for a low-risk, healthy woman and baby, midwife-attended home birth does not increase the chance of the baby dying or being harmed. Home birth does, however, increase the chance that the woman will have a drug-free, intervention-free birth: that her labour will most likely start on its own, progress normally and lead to a normal birth with little likelihood of needing any stitches. Also, she is far more likely to breastfeed and to experience her birth as very positive and satisfying. This is important because it is well-known that interventions carry risks and that there can be a cascade effect, so that when you begin with one intervention, you often end up doing more interventions as the labour progresses (eg induction leading to long labour, leading to epidural, leading to forceps delivery). This is all minimised in the group of women and babies who birth at home with a qualified midwife who has a link in to the hospital with ready access to obstetric and paediatric care if needed.

    However, a small number of studies demonstrated that home birth increases the rate of perinatal mortality. The research suggests that the inclusion of high risk factors in home birth, increases the chance of a baby dying or being seriously harmed during birth (most commonly through low levels of oxygen). Other issues may relate to the time and distance to travel from home to hospital during labour if transfer is needed, as well as the woman’s acceptance or refusal of recommended interventions once she has transferred. It is important to note that the outcomes of women and their babies who transfer to hospital during labour will generally compare unfavourably with those not transferred due to the change in risk status of the women.

    The ACM concludes that, “It seems evident from the literature that planned home birth is a safe option for women who are at low risk of complications and who receive care from qualified attendants with adequate access to support, advice, referral and transfer mechanisms.”

    With that conclusion in mind, the ACM has developed a position statement on home birth, and following on from that, guidance for private midwives who attend home births. Much discussion has been had about these documents on various forums and email lists. Some excerpts from the position statement and guidance follow:

    It is the position of the Australian College of Midwives that home is an appropriate place of birth for women considered to be at low obstetric risk, and that women must be supported in safe, planned homebirth, by midwives and/or other appropriately qualified and regulated health professionals with adequate access to support, advice, and referral and transfer mechanisms.

    Some women may choose a planned homebirth even when this is not recommended by her care providers. In such circumstances, a midwife should, after discussions with each woman and in consultation with other health professionals, work with the woman looking for options and resolutions within midwifery professional standards to address the woman’s needs.

    Following documented discussions and appropriate consultation and referral as may be indicated, a midwife has the right to decline to continue to provide, or to accept, midwifery care if it is felt that this would require the midwife to practise outside of the midwife’s scope, skills and competencies.

    Midwives have a duty of care to each woman they provide care to, and this means that in labour, or urgent situations, a midwife must attend the woman.

    In the absence of a consistent definition of ‘low obstetric risk’, low obstetric risk is considered to be a pregnancy, labour and birth that are anticipated to be problem free.

    There are some contraindications to a planned homebirth which women should be informed of at booking. These are;
    • Multiple pregnancy
    • Abnormal presentation (including breech presentation)
    • Preterm labour prior to 37 completed weeks of pregnancy
    • Post term pregnancy of more than 42 completed weeks
    • Scarred uterus

    Issues identified as “B” or “C” in the Australian College of Midwives National Midwifery Guidelines for Consultation and Referral (“the Guidelines”) would require consultation with an Obstetrician prior to proceeding with a planned homebirth. Consultation is mandatory for the midwife providing care.

    Women must be made aware of the midwife’s obligation to consult at – or prior to – booking-in.

    Ideally, midwives should meet the criteria for gaining notation as an Eligible Midwife.

    Midwives must ensure that they have documented processes in place for consultation and referral

    Any decision to provide care for a planned homebirth should take into account the possibility of transfer to a hospital and the time needed for transfer to that hospital in the event that this is deemed necessary. Women should be counselled on the possibility of transfer, and midwives should ensure that the supporting hospital is provided with a care plan/documentation around the woman’s intention for a planned homebirth.

    Midwives must utilise documented evidence-based guidelines to support antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal midwifery care.

    Midwives should undergo a formal professional peer review process at least once every three years.

    At – or prior to – booking, the midwife must advise the woman of situations where homebirth cannot be supported. At any time, the midwife is not obliged to participate in a homebirth that the midwife considers will increase the risk of harm to the woman or her baby.

    Women must be respected in the choices that they make, and that includes choices to refuse a recommended course of action at any stage of her pregnancy,

    An information pack should be made available to women that should include a ‘Terms of Care’ document outlining the terms under which midwifery care will be provided.
    Information should also include the potential for transfer to hospital for unforseen complications.
    The following information must be provided to women at the onset of their care, ideally in writing, followed up in discussion and signed by the woman:
    • Midwifery scope of practice, including the Australian College of Midwives Guidelines for Consultation and Referral;
    • Philosophy of care;
    • Choice of birth setting, including requirements for homebirth;
    • Contact information for the midwife;
    • Back-up arrangements;
    • Standards of practice and protocols, including consultation and referral
    • Responsibilities of the woman;
    • Confidentiality and access to the woman’s records (privacy agreement); and
    • Financial arrangements

    It’s fair to say that ACM’s position statement and guidance are not ideologically- or belief-driven. It’s clear that the documents are driven by evidence. ACM has tackled the conflicting issue of the woman’s negative right to autonomy versus the midwife’s responsibility to practice safely and within accepted standards of care. While much is being said on various forums, email lists and face-to-face about these documents, somehow, I can’t help but wonder if the issue is really about the restriction of home birth to low-risk women, or the fact that at this point in time, a woman and private midwife have no option but to birth at home.

    In the whole of Australia, there is currently no clinical privileging except in one small hospital. A high risk woman’s only option via this new position statement is to birth in hospital, however her private midwife would not be able to attend in the full capacity of midwife – or even as a support midwife: it has recently come to our attention that the midwife cannot legally attend in hospital at all.

    I’ll explain why: the MIGA insurance policy covers privately-admitted patients. If the woman is admitted as a public patient after being transferred from a home birth (either in pregnancy or during labour), MIGA insurance does not provide indemnity cover to the midwife in respect of the birth. Most women planning a home birth will have a back-up hospital booking as a public patient. Hence, when the midwife goes in with the woman, the midwife’s insurance does not cover her. It is against the requirements of registration to work without insurance, except at a home birth. In other words, the midwife would be attending the woman in hospital against the requirements of registration.

    In time (hopefully sooner rather than later), midwives will have admitting rights where we can admit, care for and discharge our own private patients, all funded by Medicare and indemnified by MIGA but in the meantime, this is not possible.

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Melissa Maimann & Andrew Pesce: Collaborating for success

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    ALTHOUGH only a handful of collaborative arrangements have been signed between obstetricians and midwives since national maternity reforms were introduced in November, calls for a policy rethink are premature and counterproductive.

    In fact, the reforms provide an exciting opportunity for collaborative maternity care that is safe, locally responsive and woman-centred.

    A variety of private maternity care models are possible and we are confident these will build on Australia’s strong record of safety and quality in maternity care. They will also meet the needs of women who want the familiarity and the comfort of knowing the obstetrician and midwife who will be with them through their pregnancy, birth and new parenting experience …

    Obstetricians may be concerned that the new arrangements mean they will not be directly involved in patient care until something goes wrong, while some midwives fear that the arrangements will be used to control midwifery practice, adversely impact on childbirth choices and promote anticompetitive restriction of trade.

    We believe we are the first private obstetrician-midwife team in Australia to have successfully negotiated a formal collaborative arrangement and we are very happy with how it has progressed since our first discussions.

    The first woman under our joint care gave birth in March this year and we have several others booked through to January 2012.

    We share a similar philosophical approach to maternity care and have agreed practice guidelines that we believe to be safe, evidence-based and woman-centred …

    … Women appreciate the continuity of care, and the assurance that an obstetrician they have met will be involved if medical assistance is required. Feedback from women so far has been outstanding. The main criticism has been that this model of care is not available in other hospitals.

    One of the reasons why there are currently so few collaborative arrangements has been the time taken by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency to endorse eligible midwives and by public maternity units to credential midwives in private practice.

    … Our agreed guidelines are explained to patients before they engage our services and childbirth choices are not restricted. In fact, choices are enhanced as the midwife is able to attend births in the full capacity of a midwife in hospital.

    Importantly, our model of care does not dictate “transfer” of care, merely a shift in the balance of obstetric and midwifery care because we recognise that every pregnant woman needs her own obstetrician and midwife. We support midwife care during waterbirth, vaginal birth after caesarean section, physiological birth positioning and physiological third stage.

    Change is often difficult as we all tend to be creatures of habit. This change brings with it many opportunities for obstetricians and midwives in private practice to work together in ways that are beneficial to both and, importantly, to the women in their care.

    … The maternity reforms will succeed if we remember that midwives and obstetricians are in it for the same reason — to provide safe care that meets the needs of our patients, within a respectful, professional environment.

    Dr Andrew Pesce is an obstetrician practising in Sydney and immediate past president of the AMA. Ms Melissa Maimann is a midwife in private practice based in Sydney.

    Home birth has pros and cons

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    The number of at-home births is small but growing as pregnant women weigh the idea of a drug-free and surgery-free birth in a familiar setting versus the risk of harm to the baby in case of complications.

    When most pregnant women go into labor, they pack their bags for the hospital. When Lara Carlos felt the contractions in November 2008, she set up a birthing tub in her bedroom.

    For the next several hours, Carlos alternated between padding around her home and squatting and pushing in the tub. Her midwife poured water down her back and dabbed her forehead with cold towels. When the baby (they chose the name Vincent) arrived at 1:21 a.m., he spent his first few hours cuddling with his parents in their bed.

    Carlos … is one of a small but growing number of women who are choosing to deliver their babies at home. Her first son, Ivan, had been delivered in a hospital, and she says she found labor at home a dramatic improvement.

    “In the hospital, there were seven medical students in the room when I was pushing my son out,” she said. “At home, it was a very quiet, slow experience, and the water helped me to relax.”

    Though home births account for only about 1% of all births each year … they increased by 20% from 2004 to 2008 … The practice is most popular among well-educated mothers who favor natural childbirth without the drugs or surgeries a hospital might use.

    … The increase has reenergized the fierce debate over the safety of at-home delivery. The practice is officially frowned on by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists … because the absence of emergency medical equipment and specialists accustomed to dealing with complications means that problems during labor could cost the baby’s life.

    “All the existing scientific evidence, as well as state and national statistics, make it ultra-clear that home birth increases the risk of death,” …

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists does acknowledge that home births are associated with fewer medical interventions than hospital births … 61% of women who had vaginal delivery received an epidural in 2008, the year the report studied. And a 2006 national survey of women’s childbearing experiences showed that 55% were given Pitocin to speed labor.

    “There’s no doubt that once you end up in a hospital, you end up with more interventions — that’s what drives some families away,” … home birth is reasonable as long as women have few risk factors …, have an emergency backup plan and understand the risks involved.

    Women also turn to home birth in order to avoid caesarean sections, which have become more common as obstetricians became increasingly reluctant to take chances at the slightest sign of fetal distress …

    What’s more, many hospitals do not allow women who have previously had a caesarean to attempt a vaginal birth because of the risk of uterine rupture, even though a 2010 National Institutes of Health advisory panel concluded that the risk of uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one caesarean was just 1% and that more women should be offered the choice. Women wishing to have a VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean) may have no option but to do so on their own turf.

    Sarah … had two caesareans but chose a home birth for her third pregnancy, successfully delivering a baby girl in January 2010.

    “We had visited numerous hospitals, and the first time I mentioned a VBAC, I was just shut down completely,” Bolson says. Doctors refused to consider it because of the chance of rupture, she recalls, and one said he couldn’t risk having his medical malpractice insurance skyrocket.

    She eventually found a certified professional midwife who was willing to help her deliver at home, with a backup plan of transfer to a nearby hospital. Though initially worried about complications, “after I was able to release the fear, I was free to birth without any inhibition.”

    Many home-birth moms also say they object to other aspects of hospital births, such as having to lie in a bed, abstain from food during labor and be monitored by an army of nurses.

    “I believe in the intuitive power of the human body,” said Mayim Bialik, an actress and natural-birth advocate who has given birth at home. “I believe in having as much privacy as possible, in being able to move freely, to eat when I want, drink when I want, and to be surrounded by the sounds and smells of what is familiar to me.”

    “Other mammals go off on their own to labor,” adds Dr. Stuart Fischbein, a Los Angeles-based obstetrician who has been delivering exclusively in homes since 2010. “When a patient goes to a hospital, she gets told to lay flat on her back strapped down with monitors with constant interruptions from hospital personnel — does that sound conducive to having a normal labor?”

    Arrangements for a home birth go something like this: Early in the pregnancy a woman finds either a … midwife … The midwife provides some or all of the woman’s prenatal care and is on call as the woman approaches her due date …

    During labor, many women use water tubs because they find the water soothing and pain-relieving; others choose to just move about their homes as they see fit. The midwife monitors the fetus’ heart tones with a Doppler device, and most also bring equipment such as oxygen tanks, anti-hemmorhagic medication, local anesthetic and suturing supplies in case of tearing or bleeding. If an emergency arises that the midwife can’t manage, home-birth moms are advised to transfer immediately to a hospital.

    The core of the home-birth debate lies with the safety of the baby — and here, opinions and the data are sharply divided. A 2005 study of 5,418 births in the U.S. and Canada during 2000 … found that the neonatal death rates of at-home births were comparable to those of births in hospitals.

    But a July 2010 analysis published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology examined the outcomes of 12 home-and-hospital-birth studies and found that babies born at home die at two to three times the rate of those born in hospitals …

    … the distance to the nearest emergency room can sometimes mean the difference between life and death. “Saying, ‘trust birth’ is like saying ‘trust the weather,’” she says, referring to a slogan occasionally used in natural-birth groups.

    Just as vocal online communities have sprung up to promote home birth, so too have others populated by women whose home-birth attempts turned into tragedies … Liz Paparella’s fourth child was stillborn on her living room couch because her midwife failed to take Paparella to the hospital when she began bleeding during labor.

    “I never thought it was more dangerous to have a baby at home than at the hospital,” says Paparella, who had given birth successfully at home two times previously. “In birth, the risk can change from low to high in a matter of minutes.”

    … A clear answer to the safety question is hard to find because nearly every home-birth study has some flaw that is flagged by one side of the debate or the other as invalidating the results. Given this uncertainty, Ouzounian cautions women to research, prepare and choose wisely.

    Home births, he says, should be considered only by those who have a well-trained midwife and are experiencing no complications with their pregnancy …

    “Under the right circumstances, with the right patient selection and with a … midwife attending, the overall maternal complication rates with home births are comparable” to those of a hospital birth …

    But he also advises women not to think about birth in black-or-white terms: There are many ways to make delivery more “natural” even if it takes place in the hospital …

    Fischbein says that doctors could be more accommodating to their patients by providing them with information about all of their birth options — at home and in the hospital — and stand ready to serve as backups for those who wish to labor at home with a midwife.

    “There’s room in this world for low-risk home birthing and for hospital birthing,” he says. “We really should support each individual woman’s right to choose how to deliver her baby.”

    Maternity Reforms: Good news for expanded birthing options

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Maternity reforms came into effect in November 2010 which gave women access to Medicare benefits for private midwifery care for the very first time. In addition, eligible midwives were to be able to order relevant tests and ultrasounds through Medicare. Medicare benefits are available to clients of eligible midwives for pregnancy and postnatal care, however there is no benefit for birth care at home.

    So, 6-odd months on, how are things looking for maternity care and what possibilities await us?

    Well, for a start, we had around 200 private midwives in Australia. 6-odd months into the reforms and we have at least 30-40 eligible midwives. Some of those 200 midwives have ceased private practice, leaving about 100 in private practice. So 30-40 eligible midwives represents a 30%-40% update of the maternity reforms by the current private practice workforce in just 6 months. That is phenomenal. As well as this, private practice has become a more attractive option to employed midwives now that private practice is medicare-funded and indemnified. So in months and years to come, we will have more midwives in private practice, and less in the hospital employed system. This is not a concern as the hospitals would not need their own staff: women will bring their midwife with them to the hospital when they come in to birth their babies. From the hospitals’ perspective, this is excellent news: they may benefit from significant cost savings in terms of recruitment, retention, staff education, pay-roll, rostering, management and so on.

    What about for women? Well, it is well-known that women benefit from exclusive one-to-one midwifery care through pregnancy, labour, birth and the postnatal period. When women are cared for exclusively by one midwife, we know that they experience lower rates of interventions without compromising safety, and they experience higher rates of satisfaction with their birth and new parenting experience. When women choose a Eligible midwife, they can access significant medicare benefits that do reduce the cost by quite a lot. Depending on the number of pregnancy and postnatal consultations a woman has, the benefits range from say $1,000 – $2,500.

    However, in order for eligible midwives to provide medicare-rebatable services, midwifery care needs to be delivered within a collaborative arrangement. And this does open the possibility for private midwives and private obstetricians to work together in collaborative practice. The huge benefit to the woman is that she has midwifery care right the way through, from early pregnancy to 6 weeks after her baby arrives, with the reassurance of having a known obstetrician who is available is needed. Women meet the obstetrician twice in pregnancy, and the obstetrician is available for labour and birth if his care is needed, and in this way, women can benefit from the ultimate in continuity of carer. This model of care is now available for the very first time in Australia history, and we are very pleased to be able to offer it to women. So far it is a very popular option! More to come.

    C-section not best option for breech birth

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Physicians should no longer automatically opt to perform a cesarean section in the case of a breech birth, according to new guidelines by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada.

    Released yesterday, the guidelines are a response to new evidence that shows many women are safely able to vaginally deliver babies who enter the birth canal with the buttocks or feet first …

    … Since 2000, C-sections have been the preferred method of delivery in breech births. Studies suggested that breached births were associated with an increased rate of complication when performed vaginally.

    As a result, many medical schools have stopped training their physicians in breech vaginal delivery.

    The problem now, according to Dr. Lalonde, is that there is a serious shortage of doctors to teach and perform these deliveries.

    With the release of the new guidelines, the SOGC will launch a nationwide training program to ensure that doctors will be adequately prepared to offer vaginal breech births .

    The new approach was prompted by a reassessment of earlier trials. It now appears that there is no difference in complication rates between vaginal and cesarean section deliveries in the case of breech births.

    … Ms. Guy started the group after the birth of her second child in the fall of 2006. Although she had given birth to her first child at home with a midwife, Ms. Guy delivered her daughter in the hospital because of the baby’s breech position.

    “I was cornered into an unneeded and unwanted C-section because the obstetrician that I had didn’t have the experience to catch her,” said Ms. Guy.

    The aim of the coalition is to ensure that women know what their options are when it comes to breech birth. Ms. Guy believes that many women don’t realize that vaginal breech births are even possible.

    … The new decision to offer vaginal breech birth aligns with the SOGC promotion of normal childbirth – spontaneous labour, followed by a delivery that is not assisted by forceps, vacuum or cesarean section. In December of 2008, the society release a policy statement that included its recommendation for a development of national practice guidelines on normal childbirth.

    “The safest way to deliver has always been the natural way,” …

    … The SOGC believes that if a woman is well-prepared during pregnancy, she has the innate ability to deliver vaginally …

    In NSW, we have the Towards Normal Birth Policy which also promotes normal birth, waterbirth, vaginal breech birth, vaginal twin birth and VBACs. The policy directive recommends one-to-one midwifery care for all women having their first baby, twins, breech or VBAC. It’s a very encouraging policy.

    QLD: Mums-to-be pushed into caesareans with private hospitals leading the way

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    SOME of the state’s biggest private hospitals are performing caesareans on more than half the women giving birth …

    The caesarean rates among the highest in the country were uncovered in hospital birth statistics from 2007-2010 obtained by The Sunday Mail under Right to Information laws.

    Queensland’s “caesars palace” was the North West Brisbane Private Hospital, which performed the surgery on 56.8 per cent of women giving birth. Toowoomba’s St Vincent’s Hospital and The Wesley Hospital in Brisbane rounded out the Top 3, with rates of 54.8 per cent and 51.8 per cent respectively.

    The latest figures … will reignite the turf war between midwives, who espouse natural birth, and obstetricians who defend surgical intervention.

    Caesarean births are recommended as safer options for women having large babies, twins or breech births, as well as older mums and women who have had previous caesareans.

    Latest recommendations from Canada suggest that vaginal birth is safest for most breech babies. NSW Health promotes vaginal birth for twins and of course we know that vaginal birth after a caesarean is safer than elective repeat caesarean provided that the birth takes place in a facility that has resources available to perform an emergency caesarean if needed. And “big” babies? This cannot be known with any accuracy ahead of time and the current recommendation is for a planned vaginal birth.

    But some critics say growing numbers of medical professionals are convincing mothers to undergo caesareans just to streamline private maternity ward schedules and maximise revenue.

    Across the state the figures add weight to the theory, with caesareans accounting for 27.6 per cent of births in public hospitals and a huge 48.3 per cent in private hospitals.

    We know that this difference is not comprised of women requesting caesareans: only 2-3% women actually request a caesarean. Most are told they “need” a caesarean because their baby is “big” (3.3Kg), “late” at 39 weeks and 6 days, a previous caesarean, breech, twins, IVF, mum is “overweight”, mildly elevated blood pressure (130/80) and so on. I have heard all of these and more, as “valid” reasons for caesarean.

    Several new mothers approached by The Sunday Mail last week said they had been pushed into having caesareans by private hospital obstetricians after initially wanting to give birth naturally.

    One Coolum mum, 45, said her obstetrician told her she had “no choice” because the baby would “not fit through my birthing canal”.

    This can not be known ahead of time. The only way to find out is to labour and see how it goes. Dedicated, exclusive, one-to-one midwifery care in labour from a midwife who is know to the woman by name and trusted by the woman, is the most important factor in ensuring a normal birth.

    … “I just wanted a natural birth, to me that was important …

    I think personal responsibility also plays a part here. If a woman genuinely wants a natural birth, she needs to consider which care provider will maximise her chances of achieving this. Consumers of any service are wise to research options thoroughly before they go ahead with them. We do more research about buying a car, house or holiday than we do when choosing our care providers. Having chosen an ill-suited care provider, it is never too late to change.

    Another mum … desperate to avoid a caesarean, said her obstetrician also tried to book an induction because she had passed her due date in the Christmas-New Year period.

    “The obstetrician said we can book you in for an induction because we just don’t like calling people in on public holidays,” …

    But doctors point the finger at today’s “too posh to push” mothers, who they say demand caesars, as well as older mothers who have an added risk with vaginal births.

    Australian College of Midwives spokeswoman Professor Jenny Gamble said the health system was driven by profit.

    “It’s all about less night disturbance and more throughput; it all comes down to money,” she said. “It’s a fee-for-service model the more women obstetricians see, the more they earn.”

    Australian Medical Association Queensland president Dr Gino Pecoraro rejected as “urban myth” claims that obstetricians earned more for caesarean births.

    Private Hospitals Association Queensland said birthing decisions were not made by the hospital.

    This is true: hospitals do not make any decisions about birth: those decisions are made by the doctor and patient. As we have read in this article, many of the decisions are “guided” by the doctor. The other factor in these escalating caesarean rates is litigation. When caesarean rates increase and doctors are reluctant to attend VBACs, the caesarean rate will automatically increase.

    Not all doctors have high caesarean rates and some are very supportive of normal birth BUT … if a woman genuinely wants a normal birth, the best advice is to go a normal birth specialist.

    Midwives not Confident to Lead Normal Births ???

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    This article was a bit grrr to read! Essentially, a small hospital – serviced by midwives and GP Obstetricians – is facing a crisis where the GP Obstetricians are no longer able to offer an obstetric service. It is a low-risk unit that transfers any high risk women and babies in pregnancy or labour – most issues would arise in pregnancy, or would even be apparent at booking-in. The role of the midwife is to care for low risk pregnancies and births on his/her own authority. Yet as you’ll read below, the Director of Nursing (who for some odd reason comments on a service that is not related to the one that she directs) allows these midwives – who she understands cannot perform in their role – to continue to practice in the hospital. Does this happen anywhere else? If your optometrist can’t examine your eyes, or your dentist can’t check your teeth or do a basic filling, we wouldn’t consider them fit to practice. Do members of the public expect that their health practitioners are able to perform in their roles? Maybe we do have this expectation, but the Director of Nursing in this article doesn’t agree. Perhaps they need a Director of Midwifery?

    Kerang District Health was one of the big winners from north-west Victoria in this year’s budget … but despite this welcome injection of funds, there is some concern about how the hospital will continue to offer maternity services …

    Kerang District Health does not deal with high risk birthing situations …

    … following the announcement that Kerang’s three GP obstetricians will no longer be working in this area beyond the end of this year, the hospital’s CEO, Rob Jarman, says the limited services that are offered are under threat.

    … Though there are around 12-15 midwives, Ms Hendrick says that they are currently not confident enough to lead the births and that in some cases an obstetric doctor is the only option.

    … Kerang is working on updating the skills of their midwives – and Ms Hendrick says she hopes that with this will come an increase in confidence that will enable a greater involvement of the midwives in the care of the mothers during the birth.

    The article goes on to talk about a woman who had her baby by emergency caesarean at the hospital, and thank god there were doctors there to save everyone because who knows what would have happened if there had “only” been midwives around? I’m not suggesting that doctors aren’t needed at births and that they shouldn’t be involved in the care of pregnant and birthing women – in fact, I work collaboratively with an obstetrician for the majority of the clients who book-in with me, and I love working this way. What I am saying is that midwives must be competent to perform in their roles – as care providers for normal pregnancy and normal birth – and to know when to consult and refer to our obstetric colleagues.

    Middle-class mothers ‘should be talked out of caesareans’

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    One in four births in Britain today is now carried out by caesarean, a major operation which costs the NHS thousands of pounds a time.

    The rate has more than doubled since 1980, and some research suggests their growing popularity has been driven partly by more affluent mothers demanding them – those who critics say are “too posh to push”.

    Many obstetricians consider the rate to be too high.

    Now the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) has issued draft guidance saying women who want caesareans simply because they fear giving birth naturally, rather than for a clinical reason, should be made to have a full discussion about their options.

    It says the doctor should offer to set up a separate appointment so that the woman’s concerns about childbirth can be addressed.

    The guidance … recommends: “When a woman requests a CS [caesarean section] because she has a fear of childbirth, offer referral to a healthcare professional with expertise in providing perinatal mental health support to help her address her fears in a supportive manner.”

    Doctors should “discuss the overall risks and benefits” … “to ensure the woman has accurate information”.

    Women should still be able to have caesareans if they do not want to give birth normally … “If after providing support, a vaginal birth is still not an acceptable option to the woman, offer a planned CS.”

    … the balance of risks to mother and child between caesarean and natural delivery is “controversial” …

    … while 30 years ago mothers having caesareans “were more likely to come from deprived social backgrounds”, by 2000 they were more likely to be from “higher social classes”.

    … Other research indicates that women rarely actively choose them, and that more than nine in 10 are performed on medical advice …

    Childbirth: More Labor Interventions, Same Outcomes

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Hospitals vary considerably in the frequency with which they induce labor and perform Caesarean sections. But a new study finds that these differences do not seem to affect how newborns fare in these facilities.

    Dr. J. Christopher Glantz, a professor of obstetrics at the University of Rochester, reviewed records of almost 30,000 births … Some hospitals relied heavily on induced labor and Caesarean sections, while others performed the procedures much less often.

    Dr. Glantz measured neonatal outcomes in three ways: whether a child was moved to an intensive care hospital, whether a child needed immediate assisted ventilation and whether a child received a low Apgar score.

    He found no difference in outcomes for babies born in the hospitals with the highest rates of these procedures and those with the lowest. The result suggests that routine reliance on the procedures does little to improve outcomes …

    The recipe for safe, empowering, minimal-intervention birthing is:
    A woman who is positively motivated to have a natural birth
    Who is well-prepared for pregnancy, labour, birth and parenthood
    Who is supported by one midwife and one obstetrician right the way through her pregnancy, birth and postnatal experience
    Care providers who collaborate, communicate, respect and trust one another, who work for the best interests of the woman and her baby

    Pioneering Collaborative Private Maternity Care: Continuity, woman-centered, personalised, safe.

    Our brand new model of care – launched for the first time in Australia – has recently welcomed its third baby. So far, three families have benefited from a collaborative model of private maternity care that enables women to have care with a private midwife (with Medicare funding) and also develop a trusting and nurturing relationship with a Specialist Obstetrician who is available for the pregnancy, labour and birth. Our service has so far supported an empowered birth after caesarean, a waterbirth and a natural birth. All within a hospital setting, with all the support available that is occasionally needed.

    We’ve received some really positive feedback:

    “The collaborative model seemed unique to me. To have a private midwife and our own birth experience but in a hospital with an obstetrician who was known to us as back-up in case of unexpected complications, allowed us to feel totally comfortable and confident for our first baby.”
    “I felt entirely supported and encouraged.”
    “A highly personalised level of care was offered which makes you feel listened to and allows time for lots of questions.”
    “I liked the fact that we got time to develop a relationship and feel comfortable together, allowing us a better birth experience. Postnatally, it was nice to have the same person continuing my care. It was highly personalised.”

    Our model sees women booking with me for their care. Women who are interested in having collaborative maternity care meet with the obstetrician early in their pregnancy and again between 32 and 36 weeks. Women see the obstetrician more often if additional visits with him are needed. Otherwise, I am in frequent communication with him and we work together to provide safe, evidence-based, woman-centered care to our pregnant women. This allows women to build a sense of connection, trust and continuity.

    We support natural birth, active birth, physiological birth positions, physiological third stage, water birth, VBAC, twin births, breech births … and so on. Women are really well prepared for natural birth with an emphasis on informed decision making and woman-centered care. Childbirth education is included, as well as access to a lending library of books and DVDs.

    Birth care is provided initially at home and then we move to hospital where I provide full midwifery care. The birth is attended by myself and the Obstetrician if needed / desired. It’s an intimate, calm, peaceful experience and facilitates a gentle and safe birth.

    After we have welcomed the baby and birthed the placenta, women generally stay in hospital for 4 – 24 hours before returning home. Of course, if there are any issues women are welcome to stay longer, but generally I find that women feel more comfortable in their own homes, in their own beds. I visit at home every day for a week and continue care for 6 weeks. Since women book into hospital as a private patient, they are almost assured a private room with an en-suite.

    I’m really excited about this model of care because it meets the needs of women so perfectly:

  • Women having their first babies, maybe feeling unsure of what to expect
  • Women who previously experienced dis-continuous care from care providers who were unknown to them
  • Women who are planning a natural birth but perhaps with a more challenging pregnancy
  • Women who want a home birth / birth centre birth but with a known obstetrician available if needed
  • Women who really desire a sense of control over their birthing experience
  • This is a new way of working for both midwives and obstetricians and is a really supportive and nurturing way to practice. There is a huge potential for professional growth and learning. The most positive element, however, is the radiant smiles on the faces of the women who have birthed with us and the babies who have received a safe and gentle start to life.

    No Link Found Between Overall Wellbeing Of Newborns And More Interventions At Delivery

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    In low-risk pregnant women, high induction and first-cesarean delivery rates do not lead to improved outcomes for newborns …

    The finding that rates of intervention at delivery – whether high, low, or in the middle – had no bearing on the health of new babies brings into question the skyrocketing number of both inductions and cesarean deliveries …

    ” … interventions entail some risk for the mother, and there is no evidence in this study that they benefit the baby,” … ” … if you are getting the same outcome with high and low rates of intervention, I say ‘Do no harm’ and go with fewer interventions.”

    … larger studies are needed to better understand the relationship between intervention and outcome. In the meantime … it’s hard to justify high rates of interventions – especially elective – in low-risk pregnant women without any known benefits to newborns, given that these interventions pose maternal risks …

    “Do it yourself” births prompt alarm

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    A growing number of women are choosing to give birth without the assistance of doctors or midwives, provoked by dissatisfaction with modern obstetric care, fear of unnecessary medical intervention and a desire to reclaim birth as a private, natural act.

    It’s a choice the professionals say is fraught with peril. They fear the fledgling “freebirth” movement may undo gains in mother-infant mortality. The women, however, believe unassisted childbirth is emotionally and physically the safest option for themselves and their babies.

    Some 33%, or 8708 out of 26 667 homebirths in the United States in 2007 were not attended by a physician or midwife … Two-thirds of those deliveries attended by someone other than a physician or midwife … were reported as “planned” …

    Canada lacks similar statistics, but a cursory search online turns up a surfeit of websites, forums … dedicated to freebirth …

    It’s a difficult trend to track with any certainty … because advocates of unassisted childbirth aim to avoid interaction with the medical system wherever possible.

    While some women forgo prenatal care entirely, others orchestrate a “planned oops” or “accidental” unassisted birth to avoid confrontation with health care providers and the law.

    Many are already mothers, wary after a bad experience with a doctor or midwife.

    “My first son’s hospital birth left something to be desired … the doctor I had was terrible. When I became pregnant a second time, I sought out a midwife and while one of the women in the practice was great, the other really talked down to my husband and I … ” … “I was probably seven months pregnant when I decided I didn’t want [that midwife] at my birth. I didn’t want it to be a guessing game.”

    Others fear being coerced into medical procedures they’re not comfortable with.

    “There are some people who can go into the birthing room and put their foot down, but I know when I go into a doctor’s office for an appointment, I get overwhelmed, let alone in a case where they’re saying your baby might die,” … “I think it’s easier to trust yourself if there’s not another voice there. Having that other set of interests involved makes me uncomfortable.”

    Doctors and midwives bring their own timelines and expectations about how a delivery should proceed, and will err on the side of intervening in birth to protect themselves against litigation … “I can see the position they’re in, because if you don’t deliver a perfect baby there’s a chance you’ll get sued, and there’s this idea that if you’ve transferred someone to the hospital or done a C-section then you’ve done everything you could.”

    … primary C-section rates ranged from a high of 23% of deliveries in Newfoundland and Labrador to a low of 14% in Manitoba.

    With up to 15% of all births involving potentially fatal complications, however, “the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of giving birth with a skilled attendant present,” …

    Proponents of unassisted childbirth say it’s all a matter of perspective. They prefer to view birth as a “spiritual, sexual experience, not an inherently dangerous medical event,” says Shanley. “I trust the same intelligence that knows how to grow the baby from an egg and a sperm into a human being also knows how to complete the process.”

    Unnecessary intervention in birth is more often the cause of complications than a remedy, she adds. “People counting, measuring and managing birth into this controlled, manipulated act, it’s no wonder women’s bodies shutdown — the way anybody’s would if someone kept interrupting them while they were trying to have sex, go to the bathroom or go to sleep.”

    Intervention should be the last resort, not a given … ” … one of the nurses asked why we didn’t go to the hospital and my husband looked her in the eye and said: ‘Because it wasn’t an emergency.’”

    The couple prepared for complications by reading books for first responders on how to deliver babies in emergency situations.

    Others look for such information online.

    “I had to assess what my personal risks were,” says Rundle. “I’m a healthy young woman, so when people say that 15% of the time there’s a complication, are they talking about women who have different medical histories than I have?”

    Some women, like Shanley, prefer to put complete faith in their bodies and refer to complications as “variations of normal.”

    “There are going to be babies who die during an unassisted birth who may not have if there had been intervention, but there are also going to be babies who die because of interventions,” she explains. “There’s no way to ensure a successful birth every time. Sometimes a baby dies and that’s just the way it is.”

    It’s not a stance Shanley takes lightly, having lost a child to a congenital heart defect following an unassisted delivery, and been told by a coroner that the baby would have died even if she had gone to the hospital.

    It’s a difficult stance to counter, says Canadian Association of Midwives president Anne Wilson. “You can’t say to a mum that 60% of all unassisted births result in complications where the baby dies because that kind of statistic doesn’t exist. A lot of complications in childbirth are predictable and occur over time, but a few happen without warning, such as severe hemorrhage. And if a woman doesn’t have prenatal care, doesn’t report the birth to the hospital, there’s no way to know.”

    … “Unassisted childbirth is unsafe — period,” … “The people advocating this as a mainstream option for women are tragically uninformed.”

    Midwives, however, are more “fuzzy” on the issue, says Wilson. The association has yet to take an official stance for fear of alienating women wary of intervention. “If someone came to us who was considering an unassisted birth we would want to keep that person engaged, build a relationship of trust and if they ended up going ahead with it, at least you’re someone they can call if they get half way through a delivery and change their mind.”

    Failing that, “some prenatal care is better than none,” she adds.

    The debate raises ethical questions of “autonomy versus beneficence” for midwives, Wilson says. “By the nature of what we do, we tend to look after people who don’t want interventions. It would come down to individual choice in terms of how comfortable you are as a practitioner taking that person into your care.”

    For Shanley, however, unassisted childbirth is more a question of reproductive rights. “It’s your body, your birth and your baby, so you should have the right to give birth however you want.”

    Birth of a great idea

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    LIKE most first-time mothers, Kyla Lake is eagerly awaiting the birth of her baby this month.

    Her midwife Teresa Walsh is just as excited because Kyla’s baby will be the first born in Ipswich under the new Medicare for midwives laws, part of the government’s health care reform package.

    A change in national laws on November 1 last year gave mothers the choice of a private midwife for their pregnancy and birth care in hospital and the ability to claim a Medicare rebate for the services.

    Ms Lake said having a midwife had helped quell any fears or concerns she had regarding her pregnancy and birth.

    “They give you tips and advice and talk to you regarding what will happen at hospital,” Ms Lake said. “It makes you feel more relaxed about the whole process.”

    The 24-year-old Walloon resident is due on March 20 and plans to give birth in Ipswich Hospital.

    … expectant mothers and midwives got to know each other during the pregnancy and birth, with the midwife available for advice and support for six weeks after the birth.

    … “My Midwives clients had 13 beautiful babies in February, which was more than we expected, so women really seem to like our service.

    … midwives worked in collaboration with obstetricians at the hospital and other health providers to make sure women got all the care and support they needed during pregnancy, birth and afterwards.

    Very exciting times for maternity in Australia! We are in the midst of rapid and very positive change.

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Midwives May Need Alternative Training

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Midwives and obstetricians may need formal training in complementary therapies because they are becoming so popular among pregnant women …

    Acupuncture, yoga, chiropractic and herbs all get involved during pregnancy and childbirth …

    In Germany almost all obstetric departments offer acupuncture or homeopathy …

    And in Australia, New Zealand and the USA more than 70 per cent of midwifes make use of alternative therapies.

    … few professionals had training in these topics – in spite of supporting them – and many did not understand the risks they might pose to pregnant women.

    … “… the holistic nature of CAM has a close affinity with the philosophy, professional goals and care perspectives of many midwives.” …

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Midwives gaining in popularity

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    When Christy Gasstrom gave birth to her son five years ago, the first-time mom from Ilion received care from an obstetrician.

    But when a Utica doctor told her during her second pregnancy that she no longer was a candidate for natural birth because of her previous Caesarean section, she decided to go a different way.

    “I didn’t like that answer so I did some research and ended up moving over to the midwives at Bassett (Healthcare),” she said.

    A few months later, Gasstrom successfully delivered her daughter Logan …

    Midwives … are gaining popularity as more women embrace natural childbirth, local practitioners said.

    Officials at Mohawk Valley Women’s Health Associates in New Hartford and Bassett Healthcare in Cooperstown said the majority of their maternity patients now work with midwives at some stage of their pregnancy. And statewide, more new midwifery licenses were issued in 2010 than in any year since 2006, bringing the total number of licensed practitioners to 879.

    A state law that took effect in October also gave midwives more freedom to practice without direct doctor supervision …

    Gasstrom, who had a midwife … at her delivery last year, said the experience was drastically different from the labor that led to her C-section. The midwife spent more time with her and was “more involved” than her first doctor had been …

    … Joann Roberts, one of four certified nurse midwives who work with Mohawk Valley Women’s Health Associates, said midwives bring a different perspective to childbirth than most obstetricians and have been shown to reduce Caesarean rates. Rome Memorial Hospital, where she performs deliveries, for example, had an 8 percent Caesarean rate in 2010 compared to the national average rate of 26.5 percent reported in 2007.

    “We always expect that our mother will be having a normal birth right from the beginning, unless an emergency comes up,” Roberts said, adding that patient education and patience with the labor process are key in her practice.

    Many midwives considered it a victory last summer when then-Gov. David Paterson signed the Midwifery Modernization Act, which allowed them to begin practicing without written agreements from doctors. But Roberts, who works with two physicians, said the professions complement each other and that she expects most midwives to continue working in partnership with them.

    … Dwynn Golden, one of the certified nurse midwives at Bassett Healthcare’s new birthing center in Cooperstown, said collaborative arrangements also give patients the widest choice of available options without changing providers.

    New patients at Bassett meet with a midwife during their initial visit and are given resources explaining the differences in training and experience between midwives and doctors. They then choose to work primarily with a midwife, alternate visits between a midwife and a doctor, or see a doctor exclusively.

    “With the popularity of natural childbirth, midwives are viewed as the ideal provider of prenatal care and attending the birth,” … (But) for some women who prefer inductions to be scheduled and desire an epidural throughout labor, they may not view the role of the midwife as essential to their experience.”

    Golden said facilities such as Bassett’s birthing center also offer some mothers more peace of mind because they have access to tools for facilitating natural birth, such as birthing balls and private Jacuzzi tubs, but know there is emergency medical equipment nearby should something go wrong.

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    C-section puts children at food risk

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Caesareans are the safest they have ever been, and for some women and some babies, they are life-saving and very necessary. However, we do have a current caesarean rate of over 30% and this is deemed to be too high; ie, the rate cannot be justified by medical need and at this level, may cause more harm than good. If a caesarean is genuinely necessary, the risks reported below of food allergies would be well justified by the benefit of having the caesarean.

    GIVING birth by caesarean section increases the risk of your child suffering from food allergies …

    Pediatric allergy specialist Dr Peter Smith is urging expectant mothers to consider a vaginal delivery because of growing evidence a c-section can “significantly increase the risk of your child suffering from an allergy to cow’s milk”.

    Admissions to hospital emergency departments for allergic reactions have increased by 500 per cent since 1990 in Australia.

    … the massive rise in food allergies [is] likely to be attributed to several causes rather than one.

    But symptomatic food allergy was found to occur more frequently in children born by c-section.

    “… studies have shown a difference in the composition of the gastrointestinal flora of children with food allergies compared to those without,”

    “When a child moves through the birth canal, they ingest bacteria and become naturally inoculated through a small mouthful of secretions.

    “The oral ingestion of those healthy bugs is the first bacteria that comes into their system.”

    Dr Smith said that first bacteria entering the body established “the population”.

    Not only does Australia have one of the highest prevalence of allergic disorders in the developed world, but recent studies have demonstrated a doubling in some conditions such as allergic rhinitis (hay fever), eczema and potentially dangerous anaphylaxis.

    … the next best thing to a “natural” birth was to follow birth with breast feeding.

    “Breast milk contains lots of healthy bugs … to promote the growth of healthy bacteria and assist your child’s immune system in the first few week’s of life,” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Mothers endorse birthing program

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    FOR Gemma Newman, having the same midwife care for her throughout her pregnancy made all the difference when it came time to give birth.

    The mother-of-two is one of 250 women who have used the Aboriginal Medical Service’s Murundhu dharaa birth program since it began operating 18 months ago.

    The midwife-led program incorporates antenatal, birth and postnatal care.

    … During her pregnancy, she was cared for by midwife Tracey Foster, who visited her at her home and at work.

    Mrs Foster was present when Mrs Newman went into labour, and stayed for Mahli’s delivery at Orange Base Hospital.

    … having the same midwife the whole way through her pregnancy had improved her experience this time round.

    … “I’ve found it a lot better this time, especially with the after care, if I’ve had any problems with breastfeeding and things like that I’ve been able to call her at any time,” …

    … The Orange Aboriginal Medical Service opened its new birthing centre on Palmer Street last Monday …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Big mums risk babies’ health

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Pregnant women are packing on too many kilograms, risking their health and that of their babies – and costing the health system a fortune.

    A staggering 41.5 per cent of the 7735 women who gave birth at Auckland’s National Women’s Hospital in 2009 were classed as overweight or obese.

    Those with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 25 were considered overweight, while those who exceeded 30 were said to be obese.

    … national and international research showed it was a growing problem …

    … Big mums … were at increased risk of:

    * Developing diabetes and other serious pregnancy complications such as pre-eclampsia.

    * Having a stillbirth. There is a two-fold increase for obese mothers.

    * Needing a caesarean section.

    * Breast-feeding problems.

    * Having a big baby, which in turn is at risk of becoming an obese child.

    … Another concern was a trend in pregnant women, aged under 25, being obese.

    … obese mums also had a higher chance of having a baby with an abnormality …

    Nutrition and exercise are the foundations of a healthy pregnancy, healthy birth and healthy baby. In my service. I focus a lot on optimising women’s nutrition because it is a modifiable aspect of care that can really make a difference. For women choosing homebirths, I think it’s especially important to make really healthy food choices and to exercise most days of the week. I acknowledge that it’s really hard to change habits – especially exercise and nutrition habits – so I provide lots of support, guidance and motivational tools to help women work towards health.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    When expectant mothers go beyond their expected date of delivery…

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    When expectant mothers go beyond their expected date of delivery… the world ends. Well, I think that’s what the author of this article wants us to believe. This is a seriously bad article that I had to share. Everything about it – the accuracy of the information, the language and the style – are cringe-worthy. If your baby hasn’t arrived “on time”, please don’t read this article. Skip to the next one.

    Link

    You have probably heard of a lady who has gone beyond their expected date of delivery (EDD). This is known as post term pregnancy. “Post-term pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy that extends to 42 weeks and beyond,” …

    Actually, no. Post-term pregnancy is one that continues past 42 weeks. A pregnancy is post-dates after 40 weeks, but it is not post-term until after 42 weeks. A baby can be post-mature at any time, but generally a post-mature baby is born after 42 weeks. Not always though – many post-42 week babies show no signs of post-maturity.

    Dr Mike Kagawa, an Obstetrician and Gynaecologist … explains that a number of reasons could be behind this. But first it is important to have this at the back of one’s mind. “When we tell expectant mums when the baby will come, it is an estimate,” he says.

    Thank goodness for this piece of truth.

    The commonest cause thus far is when the dates are wrong …

    Another cause of this variation is technology, more so the ultrasound. “The results depend on the individual, the machine used and the timing. When a scan is done too early or too late, it may not be accurate,” …

    The earliest scan, and preferably one from the first trimester, should be used if ultrasound is used for pregnancy dating. If the woman is sure of her last period date, has regular periods, has had at least three periods since ceasing breastfeeding and was not on the pill for at least 3 months prior to becoming pregnant, a dating ultrasound may not be necessary.

    But as fate would have it, some people genuinely go beyond their due date.

    Actually, as fate would have it, a normal pregnancy lasts somewhere between 37 and 42 weeks. It’s perfectly “normal” to go beyond 40 weeks.

    “There are two categories of these,” he explains, “The first group do not start labour until induced.” This he says, can not easily be explained but once induced, the labour proceeds normally.

    Ah, so those women would simply stay pregnant forever if they were not induced? I don;t know any woman who has been pregnant for ever. Do you? I know of plenty of care providers who have not been patient.

    In the second group are those that have medical problems … sometimes the baby may delay because they have congenital they are born with anomalies, health complications especially those involving the brain. An example, he says, is a condition medically termed anencephaly, where the brain lacks its outer covering (or skull). “The pregnancy can even be overdue by two months.”

    And we know this because we regularly have women gestating to 48 weeks! The medical conditions mentioned are very rare.

    In Dr Caughey’s article, other factors like the baby being male, genetics, previous post-term pregnancy and the fact that one is giving birth for the first time (primiparity) also lead to post-term pregnancy. “All that said, we do not want babies going beyond their due-date,” … as the baby grows, so does the placenta because it is the route by which the baby gets nutrients. At 40 weeks, this growth is no longer proportional. The baby keeps growing, but the placenta does not and yet the baby needs even more nutrients. Inadequacy of the placenta puts the baby at risk of starvation. For this reason, doctors give it up to 42 weeks, if the dates were accurate, then induce labour.

    Ok, so this paragraph is kind of ok. There are tests that women can have to determine the condition of the placenta and to ensure that the baby is ok for now. Unfortunately these tests are limited, as with all testing, and there is a margin of error. Also, they only tell us how the baby and placenta re right now, not necessarily how they will be next week or even next month. That said, some women will opt for testing and monitoring and if all’s well, they’ll continue without an induction.

    In cases of post-term pregnancy, the delivery is likely to be difficult. “The bones of the baby are harder and it is difficult to manoeuver through the birth canal,” Dr. Kagawa says. These babies may also not be as healthy or robust as those born on time and are kept in the neonatal health care unit for monitoring for some time.

    Ouch! The scare tactics. The other approach would be to suggest that until the baby is in a good position for birthing, labour will not start. This is a protective mechanism. If we go inducing the labour with the baby in a non-optimal position, the labour is more likely to be difficult and tor result in a caesarean. An alternate approach would be to encourage the baby to adopt an anterior position and then await spontaneous labour.

    The article does not mention the increased chance of having meconium in the waters of post-dates and post-term babies. This is more likely after 40 weeks than before 40 weeks. It is not a problem in itself, but it can become a problem if the baby should become distressed in labour and gasp. It’s recommended that women who have meconium staining have continuous monitoring to keep a closer eye on the baby and any distress that might be occurring. The use of telemetry will ensure that mobility and access to the bath and shower are not restricted.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Law Gives Nurse Midwives More Independence

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    When New York City’s St. Vincent’s Hospital closed its doors for good last year, the certified nurse midwives who held practice agreements with the hospital had nowhere to turn. Now, thanks to a landmark piece of legislation that was signed into law in June, every licensed CNM in New York state can practice independent of a physician.

    … “Midwives are the acknowledged experts in normal birth — and this legislation ensures that New York’s women have the right to choose the birth options and healthcare providers they desire — including the care of highly educated and licensed midwives.”

    … midwives handle low-risk births but have formal or informal relationships with physicians in case complications arise … midwives typically have admitting privileges and the support of the hospital’s attending physician …

    Passage of the bill was heavily opposed by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which says it has concerns regarding safety and the competition it creates with physicians.

    What a fantastic outcome! Everyone was very concerned when St. Vincent’s Hospital closed its doors as it was the only hospital that provided written practice agreements with midwives – a requirement of a private midwife’s practice. However, the passage of this Bill paves the way for many women to access safe midwifery care.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Medicare … at last!

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Many Sydney families may now benefit from legislative changes that enable women to claim medicare benefits for private midwifery care for homebirth or hospital birth. Melissa Maimann is thrilled to be one of the first 10 midwives nationally to receive a Medicare provider number.

    A Medicare-Eligible Midwife meets certain advanced requirements in relation to experience, formal peer review, continuing professional development and competence to provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care to women and babies. This provides an assurance to the public that services provided by a medicare-eligible midwife are of a high standard. In addition, in order to use the medicare provider number, the midwife must have a collaborative arrangement with a doctor to ensure a) continuity and b) a high level of care.

    I am pleased to also let you know that I can now order all routine tests and ultrasounds. This saves women from having to have these attended by their GP. Medicare funding means that cost is no longer a barrier to women benefiting from private midwifery care. It is well known that when women are cared for by the same midwife throughout pregnancy, birth and postnatal, they are healthier, experience less intervention, are more likely to successfully breastfeed and are more satisfied with their birthing experience.

    Melissa Maimann has negotiated a collaborative agreement with a private obstetrician enabling “Ultimate Continuity”: complete continuity of private midwifery and private obstetric care for pregnancy, birth and postnatal. Alternatively, women may obtain a referral to Melissa Maimann for private midwifery care. This referral would be from a GP Obstetrician (ie, a GP with a Diploma in Obstetrics). Please contact me if you are experiencing difficulty in obtaining a referral from your GP Obstetrician.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Unnecessary C-Sections on the Rise

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Australia’s caesarean rate was 31.1% in 2008.

    Link

    Five years ago, Jill Arnold got some unwanted news at her obstetrician’s office. At 37 weeks pregnant, Arnold was told her baby was too big for her body to deliver naturally. Flipping open a calendar, the obstetrician asked when Arnold would like to schedule a cesarean section.

    Fact: You cannot know that a baby is “too big” until you give labour a go.

    Unconvinced she needed the surgery — the doctor “couldn’t provide any statistics or data” her baby was too large — Arnold delivered her 10-pound, 3-ounce (4.6 kilogram) baby the old-fashioned way. Since then, the now 36-year old … delivered another baby weighing 11 pounds, and now pens a blog called The Unnecesarean.

    Women like Arnold, however, are becoming increasingly rare. Between 1996 and 2007, the number of C-sections performed in U.S. hospitals rose by more than 50 percent to an all-time high: Almost one in three pregnant women …

    “The most concerning problem is the high rate in first-time mothers,” …

    … The shift is toward a more streamlined labor and delivery, and profoundly affects mothers-to-be.

    … this shift is not likely to reverse any time soon.

    In 2009, 26-year old Ann Carter … labored for 14 hours. With her cervix dilated to only 6 centimeters … her doctor told her it was time for a C-section.

    “I was devastated and scared,” Carter said, “I knew it was a possibility but I was hoping it wouldn’t happen.”

    During the surgery, the doctor discovered the umbilical cord had wrapped around the baby’s neck, which explained why Carter’s labor had stalled. The C-section saved the baby boy’s life.

    Um, actually, it is very common for the cord to be around the baby’s neck, and it rarely causes concerns.

    “Most times the decision to perform a C-section is based on the physician’s judgment,” Zhang said, “but there are great variations in decision-making among physicians.”

    … there are “few clear-cut indications” of when to do one.

    … For example, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) lists “failure to progress” during labor, as an indication that cesarean delivery is needed … When things slow down, there is an element of judgment involved where a physician determines whether to continue to wait, induce or perform a C-section … it can take hours to determine whether or not labor is progressing.

    In Zhang’s study, however, he found that many patients weren’t given a sufficiently long time period to allow their labor to progress. In other words, doctors were calling it quits on waiting and opting for a C-section too soon — often before the patient’s cervix was dilated to 6 centimeters.

    This was especially true in cases of induced labor … Almost half of the C-sections in these women occurred before they were 6 centimeters dilated …

    Still, it is not clear whether inducing labor raises the risk of C-section, or whether other factors are involved that contribute to why women were induced in the first place …

    … Another factor contributing to the record-high cesarean rates is a drastic decline in vaginal births after cesarean … 70 percent of women in his study who had previously undergone a cesarean delivery had C-sections with their subsequent pregnancies, without attempting vaginal delivery.

    One reason for this is a fear of lawsuits. If a physician doesn’t perform a C-section, and something goes wrong with a patient who previously had a C-section, the law often does not protect the physician …

    … the number of malpractice claims involving obstetric and gynecologic surgery are the second highest of all medical specialties. In 2009, the claims totaled over $133 million.

    Fears of legal action also explain why at least 30 percent of all U.S. hospitals have official bans prohibiting VBACs …

    The risks associated with a vaginal birth following a C-section have been somewhat exaggerated, however, Zhang said.

    “Women and physicians may be concerned about uterine rupture, but the risk is less than 1 percent,” …

    To help reduce rising cesarean rates, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced less restrictive guidelines in July, stating that vaginal birth “has fewer complications than a repeat cesarean….restrictive VBAC policies should not be used to force women to undergo a repeat cesarean delivery against her will.” …

    … some medical experts have suggested the rapid rise of C-sections in the last decade is also due in small part to mothers-to-be requesting them, not doctors. Still, data on “patient choice cesareans” is lacking, as statistics used as support of their frequency are often based on ambiguous procedural codes used on hospital discharge records.

    In any case, women who opt for a C-section may not be getting adequate information about risks, and may fear they have no other option …

    … To curb the rise, many advocate giving women more autonomy over their labor and delivery, and combining the strengths of modern medicine with the principles and practices of midwifery.

    La Follette’s California office is an example of this more comprehensive approach: After participating in a larger practice for 12 years, she now works with two experienced midwives and another physician. Her practice has a successful VBAC rate of 75 percent.

    “We take into account the expectations and ideas of the mom and balance that with medical guidance,” La Follette said.

    As more women consider practices with midwives and home births — which can be dangerous if complications arise — much of the medical establishment has been digging in its heels. In 2008, the American Medical Association’s House of Delegates proposed a resolution to declare hospitals the only safe place for labor, and only midwives who work under the supervision of physicians as safe.

    The Midwives Alliance of North America declared the resolution “seriously out-of-step with the ethical concept of patient autonomy in healthcare [that] distracts from other critical issues in maternity care.”

    If there is any chance of lowering the rates of C-sections, professional organizations will need to review all the available evidence, Zhang said.

    But any change won’t be easy. On the one hand, doctors need to include expectant moms in their own care; on the other, it sometimes seems that doctors who are worried about potential legal consequences can’t focus on a patient’s best interests.

    “We’re fighting a cultural issue,” Scott said, that extends beyond C-sections.

    She said, “We need to change the entire way we view birth and we have to be able to trust our caregivers. The alternative would be terrifying.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Who controls childbirth: women or doctors?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    That I am pregnant again is an act of either incredible optimism or mind-blowing amnesia. As the sonogram technician squirts jelly over my abdomen for my 20-week checkup, I think it’s the latter. Watching this baby, who the tech tells me is a boy, I am not caught up in visions of his future; I’m caught up in visions of mine. All of a sudden, I know with a certainty I haven’t allowed myself to confront before: Somehow, I am going to have to deliver this baby.
    Obviously, you say. But my first birth was traumatic, and although my son and I emerged fine, I lost a year seeking treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder and all the depression, fear and anger it brings. I imitated mothers who seemed normal to me, cooing and tickling my son. In truth, I was a zombie, obsessing about how I had ever let what happened happen.

    What happened is this: In my 39th week, I am induced because of high blood pressure. At the hospital, I am given Pitocin, a synthetic form of the labor-inducing hormone oxytocin, and Cervidil, a vaginal insert used to dilate the cervix. Within two hours, my contractions are one minute apart. I had lasted as long as I could without an epidural because I had read that they sometimes slow dilation. That’s the last thing I need: I’m at a pathetic 2 centimeters. My doctor comes up with a solution for the pain: a syringe full of a narcotic called Stadol.

    “I have a history of anxiety,” I tell the nurse who has brought in the syringe, as I always warn any medical professional who wants to give me drugs. “Is this drug OK for me?” “It sure is,” she says.

    It is not. Within 10 seconds, I begin hallucinating. For five hours, I hallucinate that I’m on a swing that’s soaring too high, that houses are flying at my face. My husband has fallen asleep on the cot next to me, and I’m convinced that if awakened, he will turn into a monster — literally. I’m aware this notion is irrational, that these images are hallucinations. But they are terrifying. I buzz the nurse. “Sometimes that happens,” she says …

    By noon the next day, 24 hours after I had arrived, I am only 3 centimeters dilated. The new nurse, a nice lady, tells me the induction isn’t working. “Your blood pressure isn’t even high anymore,” she says. “Tell the doctor you want to go home.”

    When my OB comes in, I say, “I’d like to stop this induction, if that’s possible. I’m worn out. I hallucinated all night … I just don’t think this is working out.”

    “OK,” he says. “Let me examine you. If you’re still not dilating, we’ll talk about going home.”

    My previous dilation exams had been quick and painless, if not entirely pleasant. This one takes a long time. Suddenly, it hurts. “What are you doing?” I scream. “Why does it hurt?”

    No answer.

    “He’s not examining me,” I scream at my husband. “He’s doing something!” My husband grips my hand, frozen, unsure.

    I scream to the nurse, the nice one who had suggested I go home. “What is he doing?” She doesn’t answer me, either. I writhe under the doctor’s grasp. The pain is excruciating.

    The first sound I hear is the doctor’s directive to the nurse, in a low voice: “Get me the hook.”

    I know the hook is for breaking my water, to speed my delivery by force. I scream, “Get off of me!” He looks up at me, as if annoyed that the specimen is talking. I imagine him thinking of the cadavers he worked on in medical school, how they didn’t scream, how they let him do whatever he wanted.

    “You’re not going anywhere,” he says. He breaks my water and leaves. The nurse never looks me in the eye again.

    Eleven more futile hours of labor later, I am exhausted and terrified when the doctor comes in and claps his hands together. “Time for a C-section,” he says. I consider not signing the consent form, ripping off these tubes and monitors, and running. But the epidural I’d finally gotten won’t allow me to stand up.

    It’s nearly midnight when I hear a cry. My first emotion is surprise; I had almost forgotten I was there to have a baby.

    I was desperate to find someone who could tell me what had happened to me was normal. To say, “You hallucinated? Oh, me, too.” Or “My doctor broke my water when I wasn’t looking. Isn’t that the worst?” Nothing …

    Now, I’d never loved my doctor … I’d found him patronizing — “Normal!” he’d shout at me, when I asked a question — I thought his assuredness might be a good antidote to my anxiousness. It seemed to work, until it didn’t.

    … I also didn’t have a birth plan … Sure, I had a plan for the birth: Have a baby using whatever breathing method I’d learned in the hospital’s birth-preparedness class, maybe get an epidural. But I didn’t have the piece of paper that so many of my friends have brought to the hospital with them … in my opinion, the very act of creating such a contract was to ignore what labor is: something unpredictable that you are in no way qualified to dictate.

    … people who hear my story ask … Did I consider a home birth? A midwife instead of an obstetrician? … The answer is no. I am not holistically minded. My philosophy was simple: Everyone I know has been born. It can’t be that complicated.

    The women who ask me about my preparations for my first son’s birth — who imply with these questions that I could have prevented what happened to me if I’d been more diligent — are part of an informal movement of women who are trying to “take back” their birth — take it back from the hospital, the insurers and anyone else who thinks he can call the shots.

    But hospitals aren’t so interested in giving women back their birth … stipulations dealing with labor and delivery (“I want only one medical professional in the room at a time”) garner barely a glance. University OB/GYN in Provo, Utah, even has a sign that reads, “…we will not participate in: a ‘Birth Contract’, a Doulah [sic] Assisted, or a Bradley Method delivery. For those patients who are interested in such methods, please notify the nurse so we may arrange transfer of your care.”

    … This question of whether I could have prevented my trauma has lingered in my mind since that day; now that I am pregnant again, it has become deafening. I have a chance to do it all over. Would I benefit from thinking more holistically? Should I bother taking back my birth?

    During my pregnancies, friends gave me two books; their spines are still barely cracked. The first is called “Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth.” … The other book is “Your Best Birth” by Ricki Lake and Abby Epstein; it’s an offshoot of their 2008 documentary, “The Business of Being Born.” Their urgent message is that women who want to deliver vaginally can do so if no one intervenes. Instead, doctors and hospitals are doing all they can to “help” the laboring woman along … and failing. Inductions like mine, epidurals given early in labor, continuous fetal-heart monitoring — all of them have been associated with a higher risk for cesarean section. The result is an epidemic — 32 percent of U.S. births were C-sections at last count, the highest rate in our history. Individual surgeries may be medically necessary, but as a matter of public health, the best outcomes for mothers and babies come with a rate of no more than 15 percent, according to the World Health Organization.

    Sam … was five months pregnant when watching “The Business of Being Born” convinced her that hospitals could be dangerous and a home birth would be more meaningful. She and her husband found a midwife … and spent the rest of the pregnancy preparing.

    After 24 hours of labor, Sam’s contractions were two or three minutes apart, yet when her midwife examined her, she was only 3 centimeters dilated. The midwife gently told her that she was nowhere close to delivering, despite her contractions, exhaustion and pain. Sam asked to be taken to the hospital.

    The change of scenery did her good. “At that point, I had been in labor for 40 hours,” she says. “I entered the relaxed zone. The epidural took the edge off … It was a sacred space.”

    After her son’s delivery, Sam passed out, having lost 50 percent of her blood volume in a postpartum hemorrhage. Needless to say, she was relieved that she was in a place where blood transfusions were readily available … she believes she will want midwife care at a hospital next time.

    … Bialik’s first birth didn’t go the way she wanted. After three days of labor at home, she stalled at 9 centimeters, one short of the goal. Her midwife suggested they go to the hospital, where after a natural childbirth, Bialik’s son spent four days in the neonatal intensive-care unit. “My son was born with a low temperature and low blood sugar, which isn’t unusual in light of the fact that I had gestational diabetes,” she explains. “I understand doctors need to err on the side of caution, but there was nothing wrong with my child. All of our plans for bed sharing, nursing on demand, bathing him — gone.”

    The experience was scarring. “I felt a sense of failure that I had to call my parents from the hospital,” Bialik continues. “Yes, I know vaginal birth in the hospital is the next best thing to a home birth.” …

    I point out that natural childbirth in the hospital — her “failure” — was my best-case scenario. But I also understand when she says, “Everyone is allowed her own sense of loss.” She realized her vision when her second son was born at home.

    The second time around
    I don’t consider myself a candidate for a home birth. The risk of uterine rupture from an attempt at vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) makes it unthinkable … I’m also not really interested in a home birth … But I’m also not interested in another C-section …

    So I’d like to attempt a VBAC, but I know that it doesn’t always succeed. I have a new doctor — the 10th I interviewed following my son’s birth — at a new hospital, and he has agreed to help me try. But my primary goal is more modest: not to be retraumatized. Even now, my heart pounds at the sight of hospital receiving blankets, the antiseptic smell of the maternity ward.

    The common thread in Bialik’s and Sam’s stories that impressed me was how supported and safe they felt with their midwife …

    In an e-mail Bialik sends after our meeting, she goes back to my idea that some women weren’t meant to have babies the holistic way. “There are those among us who believe that if the baby can’t survive a home labor, it is OK for it to pass peacefully,” she writes. “I do not subscribe to this, but I know that some feel that … if a baby cannot make it through birth, it is not favored evolutionarily.”

    I think about my appendectomy, back in 2003. Had I not made it to the hospital in time, I would be dead. What would it be like to refuse medical intervention? I’d call my family, say my good-byes. “I’m sorry,” I’d say. “But I’m not evolutionarily favored. It’s time for me to go.”

    This attitude, that everything was better back when there were no doctors, seems strange to me. C-sections, although certainly done too often, can save lives. Orthodox Jews still say the same prayer after childbirth that those who have been in near-death experiences say — and with good reason. A birth that leaves mother and child healthy may be commonplace, but it’s also a miracle every time.

    As the weeks pass and my belly grows, I can’t stop thinking about Sam. Her pregnancy was a sacred time, and she had truly looked forward to labor. Is that what I should try for — a meaningful birth, as well as an untraumatic one? At what point had people like Sam and me learned to feel entitled to a meaningful birth?

    “I think that birth should be a beautiful experience,” says obstetrician Kimberly D. Gregory, M.D. She’s the vice chair of women’s health care quality and performance improvement at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in L.A. “It should be exactly the way you want it, and doctors should intervene only to preserve the health or life of you or your baby.”

    Naturally, one would assume that Dr. Gregory advocates birth plans. When I ask her this, she laughs. “We always say, ‘If you show up with a birth plan, just get the C-section room ready,’” she says. “You get everything on that list that you don’t want. It’s like a self-fulfilling prophecy.” Dr. Gregory led an unpublished study that compared women who took traditional hospital birth classes with those who employed Bradley-like training and a birth plan. The birth-plan group trended toward a higher C-section rate and more interventions. “There’s a certain personality type that tends to be more anxious. Maybe the anxiety hormones themselves put them at risk,” Dr. Gregory theorizes. “It seems that being open and honest and choosing the right doctor is probably a better option than writing everything down. Walking in with this list appears to set up an antagonistic relationship.” …

    … In the past three weeks, I’ve had the same dream. I’m in a field (I believe at Ina May Gaskin’s Farm), and women in braids are dancing around me as my baby is born, painlessly, joyously. As I reach down, I notice my C-section scar is gone.

    I wake up upset. Am I truly under the impression, subconscious though it may be, that taking back this birth will undo the damage of the last one?

    “I don’t understand this phrase ‘take back your birth,’” nurse-midwife Pam England, creator of “Birthing From Within,” … tells me. “Who took it? What would a woman tell herself it meant about her if she failed to meet the criteria she made up for ‘taking back’ her birth? I am concerned that this phrase, meant to generate action and a feeling of empowerment, may actually be generated by or feeding the victim part of her.”

    England is right: Having a childbirth that I deem successful this time will not change what I haven’t overcome from the first. I try to find a way to make what my doctor and nurses did to me OK, but my mind rebels. I feel loss — no, theft — of an opportunity for me to have a baby the way so many other women do: a carefree pregnancy, a labor that could still go any way.

    Maybe I’m not so different from the women I spoke with, after all. Bialik had a successful natural childbirth but felt like a failure because it was in the hospital. Women who had a C-section also used words like failure. Perhaps part of the problem is that our generation of women is so ambitious, so driven, that we don’t know how to do anything without quantifying it as a success or failure.

    According to Dr. Gregory, women are now requesting a C-section for their first birth, even without indication. “A lot of people are uncomfortable with the unknown,” she says. Plenty of people are wary of C-sections by choice, from holistic moms to obstetricians. But isn’t this, too, taking back your birth? Refusing to be out of control seems to me the epitome of taking it back. You don’t have to have an unattended birth in the woods to be considered a real woman.

    Deciding that you can’t control the uncontrollable — and committing to that decision when you are, in fact, out of control — is also taking back your birth. It’s what your grandmothers did. It’s what their grandmothers did.

    With this, I realize that I have already taken back my birth, but not as part of any movement. I have stopped judging women who take extra precautions as defensive and started to understand that everyone has to find her way.

    I don’t know how this story ends. I’m still not convinced my body was made to deliver vaginally. But here’s what I do know: I will insist on kindness. I will insist on care. And I hope I will be open to being treated kindly. It’s harder than it seems.

    I have another hope, too. I hope there will be a moment when … I will look down at my baby — whether he is handed to me on my belly or from behind a curtain as my body is sewn shut — and I will remember what I’ve known from the beginning, when I looked down at that plus sign and we were alone together for the first time. Before these questions wrapped around my neck, choking me for answers. I will know that I am his mother and he is my son. And maybe, in that moment, I will be ready to say that the only success and failure is the outcome of the birth, that we are healthy …

    I’m concerned that birth is defined in terms of success and failure, and that after this author’s journey, she has determined that health is the only important factor. In this day and age, it is entirely possible to have a safe VBAC – a safe birth experience as well as a satisfying one. The vast majority of women who choose VBAC will be successful provided that they choose the right care provider.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Your birth after July 1, 2010

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    I came across this interesting article detailing an American woman’s experience of giving birth in an American hospital: Mom fires OB during birth when threatened with a cesarean! The woman writes:

    … I let myself be pushed into inducing. We were at 42wks … My family was all becoming quite impatient and there was a lot of pressure to have her out. I agreed to be induced and get things started.

    … 6 am we were at the hospital. I took a ton of food in with me, because I was not going to do this with no fuel. We got settled, the first nurse got us all checked in did all the paperwork and started the IV. They had a change of shift, so the next nurse, Anna, come-on and she was wonderful.

    Anna spoke with us and I told her how things were going to go. To call the doctor if she needed but I was the one birthing a healthy baby, and unless the stats of baby changed, this is what I wanted …I told her we would be doing the pit slowly. I only wanted an increase every 45 min to an hour, not the every 15 the Dr. had ordered. She called the Dr and it was agreed. So off we set. We had a cervical check and I was barely dilated 2 and my cervix was very posterior.
    I had no idea how the pit would work on me and baby so we just waited. Annabella was so squirmy, they couldn’t keep her on the monitors, Anna had to hold them on and move with her …

    After awhile the Dr came in and wanted to look for Annabella and when she couldn’t find her well stated the baby was breach and we needed to go have a c-section. I looked at this woman and told her no, baby had not flipped I would have felt it, and I was not getting a c-section today. That if baby had turned, then we would turn off the pit, and I would go see my Chiropractor to help move her around again. I don’t think the Dr liked me. I didn’t care. So she ordered an ultrasound just to see, and I was later told she knew baby was breach and had started the paperwork to send us on.

    Annabella was in fact not breech. She was head down just not really engaged. I felt so good knowing I was right. All this happened about 11am. There had been no increase in the pit for awhile … We started upping it again.

    During these times since Annabella wasn’t staying on the monitor anyway, I was up. I walked and rolled on the ball. I leaned over the ball to do pelvic tilts. Pretty much anything I wanted. I really enjoyed that. I was eating and drinking … At 2pm I declined another cervical check …

    I was standing and rocking my hips back and forth during the waves, and they were nice. Just these waves, they never were uncomfortable. I didn’t feel I needed to go in to off during them so I just stayed in center moving as I felt I needed to. Anna would come in and check baby with a Doppler, and the let us do our thing.

    About 4 the Dr was back, she wanted to see where we were so we checked. I was 4cm, and my cervix was no longer posterior, about 70% effaced.

    • The Dr. said I was not where she would like to see me by now. She wanted to break my waters and move things along.
    • I told her no thanks; I felt we were doing fine. Baby was fine, so was I.
    • She didn’t look surprised. She did get quite nasty though, and told me if I didn’t do things the right way this will land in a c-section and was putting myself and child at risk. That she was going off shift and there would be someone else.
    • I … looked her square in the eye and told her that my child in fine.
    • I am not having a c-section to please her that if she had not noticed this was MY birth. I was the one doing things, until someone can show me that my child was unsafe I would do this all night if needed. That was the RIGHT way.
    • Also that it was a good thing that she was going off shift, because she was fired. I didn’t want her back in my room. I didn’t need any one in there being negative. I was sure there were other people around who could catch this child, and if not I would do it myself.
    • She left the room in a quick hurry, and as I turned around again, my husband and … the nurse were all just kind of staring at me.

    My husband was stunned, and asked if I could do that, firing the Dr. I told him I didn’t care if I could or not, she wasn’t coming back to my room …I don’t know how things happened from there, but another Dr. came in and introduced himself about 45 min. later and was way more respectful than that woman had been.

    We continued, at 7pm the waves were more intense and almost on top of one another … I started to shake and shiver but I wasn’t cold. I vomited all over, and then with the next wave I felt pushy. soon there after my waters broke during one of the pushy waves.

    … My body had taken over, I had no choice but to push … Annabella was born at 8:06pm 7lbs 10oz. 21 inches long. She cried for a bit but was so awake and alert. She is just perfect. She latched on and nursed minutes after birth. I am so happy with this birth. I did it the way I wanted even if it didn’t start the way I choose. I wish the dr had been more supportive. But you can’t have it all.

    Let’s consider this case from the perspective of private midwifery care after July 1, 2010. This woman went to 42 weeks. The ACM Guidelines stipulate that at 42 weeks, the midwife must refer the woman to an obstetrician for opinion. No doubt the opinion will be that induction is warranted. The woman may accept or decline this advice. If she declines, and if the obstetrician does not agree to the midwife’s continued care of the woman, the woman will be left without care under the Government’s insurance policy. On the other hand if the woman agrees and accepts induction, this will take place according to the obstetrician’s preferences or hospital policy. As the story above shows, the woman advocated for herself throughout. She declined a caesarean, artificial rupturing of her membranes, a vaginal examination and continuous monitoring. Currently, women can birth in a hospital with their private midwife and their midwife can advocate for them provided that the woman has a birth plan that clearly states her preferences. After July 1, our continued involvement in the woman’s care will be dictated by the obstetrician in attendance or with whom we have a collaborative agreement. In the interests of maintaining a collaborative agreement and ongoing income, the midwife will need to remain silent when the woman is outside of the ACM Guidelines and does not agree to the care being suggested. After July 1, women must fend for themselves if the care being suggested is at odds with their preferences.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Fancy giving birth with just essential oils for pain relief?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Aromatherapy is being offered to women in labour at Southmead Hospital as a natural pain relief … midwives have been trained to mix a range of oils to ease symptoms for women giving birth at the hospital and in their own homes.

    The oils … have been found to have therapeutic effects and are used in massage, in a bath or dropped onto a smelling stick.

    Bergamot, jasmine, lavender, peppermint, grapefruit, clary sage and frankincense are being used by the midwives to ease symptoms such as nausea and back pain.

    … being more relaxed during labour generally helps the birth progress more smoothly.

    … a woman who had planned a natural birth and opted for the essential oils could turn to an epidural afterwards should they need it.

    … It is hoped that offering women aromatherapy will support the drive from the Department of Health for more women to give birth naturally.

    The oils will generally be used in lower risk births … which is generally the criteria for women giving birth in their own homes or in the birth suite at Southmead, which is run by midwives rather than doctors to make it a more relaxed environment.

    Previously midwives had only been able to offer women gas and air in their own homes but the aromatherapy provides more options.

    Essential oils costs less than 50p per person …

    It would be great if this could be implemented across Australian hopsitals – public and private. It seems that the UK has a huge drive at present to increase the rates of normal, natural birth. What is preventing Australia from following suit?

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Canadian Researchers Suggest Review Of Current Guidelines On C-Sections

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A recent study showing that the rate of cesarean sections performed at hospitals across … Canada, varied between less than 15% and more than 27% — with only 2% requested by the women — prompted researchers to recommend “revising the current guidelines” on when it is appropriate to perform a c-section … Difficult labor was found to be the most prevalent cause for a c-section …

    It will be interesting to read what the new guidelines say. Certainly, some factors promote vaginal birth such as staying at home for as long as possible in labour, planning a homebirth, receiving midwifery care, being well prepared – emotionally, mentally and physically – for birth, reading widely about pregnancy and birth to be well-informed and more comfortable with the process and having the continued support of a midwife who is experienced in supporting women through natural birth.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    framework for privately practicing midwives

    The Quality and Safety Framework is not out yet in its final version. A final draft has come out and it is now in the hands of the Nursing and Midwifery Board to accept or reject the Framework in whole or in part. I will update this blog once I know more details about the QSF.

    Midwifery in the home nsw legal

    Yes, midwifery is – and will remain – legal at home.

    Private health insurance, private midwifery care, australia

    Yes, Private Health Insurance may cover the cost of private midwifery care. Some health funds are more generous in their benefits than other funds so it’s worth doing your homework before becoming pregnant so you can get the cover that’s most advantageous.

    Private midwife vs obstetrician

    The role of the obstetrician is to provide care for women with complicated pregnancies and births, so they’re called in to manage things that are not seen to be progressing normally. The role of the midwife is to take care of healthy, well pregnant and birthing women (and their babies) and to refer to obstetricians when it’s necessary. Private midwifery care is holistic in nature, so women can expect that their midwife will be interested in getting to know them, they can expect their pregnancy consultations to be very thorough and to last for 1-2 hours. Private midwives attend the whole labour and birth, we do not just attend for the end of birth. Private midwives take on a much lower caseload – you’ll be hard-pressed to find midwives with more than 4 births a month, so we’re more available to our clients.

    Water birth experts australia

    That would be a midwife! More specifically, a private midwife or birth centre midwife. We regularly attend waterbirths.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448