QLD: Mums-to-be pushed into caesareans with private hospitals leading the way

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

SOME of the state’s biggest private hospitals are performing caesareans on more than half the women giving birth …

The caesarean rates among the highest in the country were uncovered in hospital birth statistics from 2007-2010 obtained by The Sunday Mail under Right to Information laws.

Queensland’s “caesars palace” was the North West Brisbane Private Hospital, which performed the surgery on 56.8 per cent of women giving birth. Toowoomba’s St Vincent’s Hospital and The Wesley Hospital in Brisbane rounded out the Top 3, with rates of 54.8 per cent and 51.8 per cent respectively.

The latest figures … will reignite the turf war between midwives, who espouse natural birth, and obstetricians who defend surgical intervention.

Caesarean births are recommended as safer options for women having large babies, twins or breech births, as well as older mums and women who have had previous caesareans.

Latest recommendations from Canada suggest that vaginal birth is safest for most breech babies. NSW Health promotes vaginal birth for twins and of course we know that vaginal birth after a caesarean is safer than elective repeat caesarean provided that the birth takes place in a facility that has resources available to perform an emergency caesarean if needed. And “big” babies? This cannot be known with any accuracy ahead of time and the current recommendation is for a planned vaginal birth.

But some critics say growing numbers of medical professionals are convincing mothers to undergo caesareans just to streamline private maternity ward schedules and maximise revenue.

Across the state the figures add weight to the theory, with caesareans accounting for 27.6 per cent of births in public hospitals and a huge 48.3 per cent in private hospitals.

We know that this difference is not comprised of women requesting caesareans: only 2-3% women actually request a caesarean. Most are told they “need” a caesarean because their baby is “big” (3.3Kg), “late” at 39 weeks and 6 days, a previous caesarean, breech, twins, IVF, mum is “overweight”, mildly elevated blood pressure (130/80) and so on. I have heard all of these and more, as “valid” reasons for caesarean.

Several new mothers approached by The Sunday Mail last week said they had been pushed into having caesareans by private hospital obstetricians after initially wanting to give birth naturally.

One Coolum mum, 45, said her obstetrician told her she had “no choice” because the baby would “not fit through my birthing canal”.

This can not be known ahead of time. The only way to find out is to labour and see how it goes. Dedicated, exclusive, one-to-one midwifery care in labour from a midwife who is know to the woman by name and trusted by the woman, is the most important factor in ensuring a normal birth.

… “I just wanted a natural birth, to me that was important …

I think personal responsibility also plays a part here. If a woman genuinely wants a natural birth, she needs to consider which care provider will maximise her chances of achieving this. Consumers of any service are wise to research options thoroughly before they go ahead with them. We do more research about buying a car, house or holiday than we do when choosing our care providers. Having chosen an ill-suited care provider, it is never too late to change.

Another mum … desperate to avoid a caesarean, said her obstetrician also tried to book an induction because she had passed her due date in the Christmas-New Year period.

“The obstetrician said we can book you in for an induction because we just don’t like calling people in on public holidays,” …

But doctors point the finger at today’s “too posh to push” mothers, who they say demand caesars, as well as older mothers who have an added risk with vaginal births.

Australian College of Midwives spokeswoman Professor Jenny Gamble said the health system was driven by profit.

“It’s all about less night disturbance and more throughput; it all comes down to money,” she said. “It’s a fee-for-service model the more women obstetricians see, the more they earn.”

Australian Medical Association Queensland president Dr Gino Pecoraro rejected as “urban myth” claims that obstetricians earned more for caesarean births.

Private Hospitals Association Queensland said birthing decisions were not made by the hospital.

This is true: hospitals do not make any decisions about birth: those decisions are made by the doctor and patient. As we have read in this article, many of the decisions are “guided” by the doctor. The other factor in these escalating caesarean rates is litigation. When caesarean rates increase and doctors are reluctant to attend VBACs, the caesarean rate will automatically increase.

Not all doctors have high caesarean rates and some are very supportive of normal birth BUT … if a woman genuinely wants a normal birth, the best advice is to go a normal birth specialist.

Doctors admit C-section error in tragic baby’s botched birth

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

TWO consultants have admitted to the parents of a baby deprived of oxygen at birth they should have performed a caesarean section earlier.

Baby Senan Michael Christopher Dodd was born at Mount Carmel Hospital, Dublin, on March 28, 2008.

There was a delay in performing the emergency birth procedure and the baby boy suffered severe brain damage due to oxygen deprivation …

He died … on March 30, 2008.

Two consultants obstetricians … acknowledged … the caesarean section should have been performed earlier.

Dr Rafferty said he contributed to the delay in delivering the baby and expressed his “profound apologies” to the baby’s parents …

[The] Midwife … told the court she called Dr Rafferty to review Roberta … due to lack of progress of labour, following an hour of active pushing.

The doctor said he gave the parents the option of a caesarean section or of an epidural with syntocinon …

Syntocinon and an epidural were administered.

But the doctor failed to look back at the trace of the foetal heartbeat, which indicated a slow heart rate at 2.45pm and another slow rate after pushing began.

… He told the inquest he should have, “been more direct and said a C-section was the way to go”.

He agreed with counsel for the family, Bruce Antoniotti, that he did not tell the Dodds there was foetal distress because he failed to perceive it, as he failed to look back far enough on the trace.

The baby’s heart rate was monitored intermittently …

This is the standard of care for women in normal labour with a healthy pregnancy and baby.

Dr Valerie Donnelly, who took over from Dr Rafferty, reviewed Mrs Dodd around 6.20pm after a prolonged period of slow foetal heart rate.

Dr Donnelly proceeded as planned and recommenced the syntocinon although it had been turned off by the midwife, who was preparing for a C-section.

“I regret I did not deliver the baby by C-section at that point. I believe my delay in making the decision to deliver him by caesarean section has contributed to his death,” …

Medical Malpractice Case Nets $58 Million Verdict

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

Three years after the same case resulted in a hung jury, a second Waterbury jury returned a $58 million verdict against a local gynecologist …

Trial lawyers … convinced the jury that the doctor had breached the standard of care by not starting a caesarian section delivery in time.

… the mother was in her 39th week of pregnancy. According to the defense, the standard of care was to not deliver a baby before 40 weeks of gestation …

… the case was the highest medical malpractice verdict in Connecticut history.

… “It was a complete runaway verdict, unsupported by the evidence. It’s not only uncollectable; it’s unsupportable.”

… The couple used in vitro fertilization to have their first and only child … When the mother visited the doctor for her checkup … her level of amniotic fluid was at half the normal level. “Our expert said that is an indication there is something wrong with the baby, and it has to be delivered that day, by caesarian section,” … Delivery, however, was delayed.

… “Our expert said that with that kind of drop in the fluid, you have to deliver this baby.”

Two days later the mother went into labor. By the time they got her down to the operating room, the baby appeared to be stuck in breach birth …

For the next three or four minutes, they struggled to get the baby out. When he was born, his only sign of life was a heartbeat. … They resuscitated him, but he developed cerebral palsy,” …

The child needs extensive home care …

Midwives not Confident to Lead Normal Births ???

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

This article was a bit grrr to read! Essentially, a small hospital – serviced by midwives and GP Obstetricians – is facing a crisis where the GP Obstetricians are no longer able to offer an obstetric service. It is a low-risk unit that transfers any high risk women and babies in pregnancy or labour – most issues would arise in pregnancy, or would even be apparent at booking-in. The role of the midwife is to care for low risk pregnancies and births on his/her own authority. Yet as you’ll read below, the Director of Nursing (who for some odd reason comments on a service that is not related to the one that she directs) allows these midwives – who she understands cannot perform in their role – to continue to practice in the hospital. Does this happen anywhere else? If your optometrist can’t examine your eyes, or your dentist can’t check your teeth or do a basic filling, we wouldn’t consider them fit to practice. Do members of the public expect that their health practitioners are able to perform in their roles? Maybe we do have this expectation, but the Director of Nursing in this article doesn’t agree. Perhaps they need a Director of Midwifery?

Kerang District Health was one of the big winners from north-west Victoria in this year’s budget … but despite this welcome injection of funds, there is some concern about how the hospital will continue to offer maternity services …

Kerang District Health does not deal with high risk birthing situations …

… following the announcement that Kerang’s three GP obstetricians will no longer be working in this area beyond the end of this year, the hospital’s CEO, Rob Jarman, says the limited services that are offered are under threat.

… Though there are around 12-15 midwives, Ms Hendrick says that they are currently not confident enough to lead the births and that in some cases an obstetric doctor is the only option.

… Kerang is working on updating the skills of their midwives – and Ms Hendrick says she hopes that with this will come an increase in confidence that will enable a greater involvement of the midwives in the care of the mothers during the birth.

The article goes on to talk about a woman who had her baby by emergency caesarean at the hospital, and thank god there were doctors there to save everyone because who knows what would have happened if there had “only” been midwives around? I’m not suggesting that doctors aren’t needed at births and that they shouldn’t be involved in the care of pregnant and birthing women – in fact, I work collaboratively with an obstetrician for the majority of the clients who book-in with me, and I love working this way. What I am saying is that midwives must be competent to perform in their roles – as care providers for normal pregnancy and normal birth – and to know when to consult and refer to our obstetric colleagues.

Some Fla. ob-gyns refuse obese patients

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

Some South Florida obstetrics-gynecology physicians say they are refusing healthy patients who are obese or very overweight because they riskier to treat.

A poll of 105 obstetrics-gynecology practices by the South Florida Sun Sentinel indicates 15 have some type of weight cutoff for new patients — some start at 200 pounds, some 250 pounds.

Some of the doctors say they fear for their exam tables or other equipment, but others say they are trying to avoid higher complication rates.

… “There’s more risk of something going wrong and more risk of getting sued. Everything is more complicated with an obese patient in [gynecology] surgeries and in [pregnancies].” …

Obesity, elective cesarean contribute to U.S. maternal mortality rate

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

In the 14 years that I’ve worked in the world of obstetrics, I’ve witnessed three maternal deaths. All three occurred in the immediate postpartum period, all were unexpected, and all were devastating for everyone involved, but most of all for the families and children left without a mother.

In the U.S., when a woman goes into the hospital to have a baby everyone expects that she will come home a few days later, happy and healthy, with a new baby. While this is usually the case, maternal death does still occur.

… Women in the US are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than women in Canada, Poland, Croatia and Greece, just to name a few. And black women in the United States are four times more likely to die from pregnancy-related problems than white women.

… it has changed little over the past 20 years. The Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation has warned that the maternal mortality rate may be increasing once again.

… why are mothers still dying in the United States when we spend more on health care than any other country in the world?

Some of the most common causes of maternal death in this country are hemorrhage, postpartum blood clots and underlying cardiac disease.

The CDC cites the rise of obesity and elective cesarean rates as possible contributing factors to the problem. Hypertension, diabetes and asthma — all culprits in pregnancy-related complications — are all more common in obese women.

Although the risks of cesarean birth are relatively minimal, studies have shown a higher mortality rate when compared to vaginal birth …

Childbirth: More Labor Interventions, Same Outcomes

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

Hospitals vary considerably in the frequency with which they induce labor and perform Caesarean sections. But a new study finds that these differences do not seem to affect how newborns fare in these facilities.

Dr. J. Christopher Glantz, a professor of obstetrics at the University of Rochester, reviewed records of almost 30,000 births … Some hospitals relied heavily on induced labor and Caesarean sections, while others performed the procedures much less often.

Dr. Glantz measured neonatal outcomes in three ways: whether a child was moved to an intensive care hospital, whether a child needed immediate assisted ventilation and whether a child received a low Apgar score.

He found no difference in outcomes for babies born in the hospitals with the highest rates of these procedures and those with the lowest. The result suggests that routine reliance on the procedures does little to improve outcomes …

The recipe for safe, empowering, minimal-intervention birthing is:
A woman who is positively motivated to have a natural birth
Who is well-prepared for pregnancy, labour, birth and parenthood
Who is supported by one midwife and one obstetrician right the way through her pregnancy, birth and postnatal experience
Care providers who collaborate, communicate, respect and trust one another, who work for the best interests of the woman and her baby

Probe into mass Caesarean birth

Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

Link

Inquiries were ordered … into allegations that gynaecologists … had conducted several Caesarean operations without waiting for the actual delivery date, so that the doctors could proceed on leave.

… patients [alleged] that 21 Caesarean operations were conducted in a span of two days, on Wednesday and Thursday, so that four gynaecologists could proceed on leave from Friday to Sunday.

… The Director of Health Services … has initiated a probe into the issue …

Pioneering Collaborative Private Maternity Care: Continuity, woman-centered, personalised, safe.

Our brand new model of care – launched for the first time in Australia – has recently welcomed its third baby. So far, three families have benefited from a collaborative model of private maternity care that enables women to have care with a private midwife (with Medicare funding) and also develop a trusting and nurturing relationship with a Specialist Obstetrician who is available for the pregnancy, labour and birth. Our service has so far supported an empowered birth after caesarean, a waterbirth and a natural birth. All within a hospital setting, with all the support available that is occasionally needed.

We’ve received some really positive feedback:

“The collaborative model seemed unique to me. To have a private midwife and our own birth experience but in a hospital with an obstetrician who was known to us as back-up in case of unexpected complications, allowed us to feel totally comfortable and confident for our first baby.”
“I felt entirely supported and encouraged.”
“A highly personalised level of care was offered which makes you feel listened to and allows time for lots of questions.”
“I liked the fact that we got time to develop a relationship and feel comfortable together, allowing us a better birth experience. Postnatally, it was nice to have the same person continuing my care. It was highly personalised.”

Our model sees women booking with me for their care. Women who are interested in having collaborative maternity care meet with the obstetrician early in their pregnancy and again between 32 and 36 weeks. Women see the obstetrician more often if additional visits with him are needed. Otherwise, I am in frequent communication with him and we work together to provide safe, evidence-based, woman-centered care to our pregnant women. This allows women to build a sense of connection, trust and continuity.

We support natural birth, active birth, physiological birth positions, physiological third stage, water birth, VBAC, twin births, breech births … and so on. Women are really well prepared for natural birth with an emphasis on informed decision making and woman-centered care. Childbirth education is included, as well as access to a lending library of books and DVDs.

Birth care is provided initially at home and then we move to hospital where I provide full midwifery care. The birth is attended by myself and the Obstetrician if needed / desired. It’s an intimate, calm, peaceful experience and facilitates a gentle and safe birth.

After we have welcomed the baby and birthed the placenta, women generally stay in hospital for 4 – 24 hours before returning home. Of course, if there are any issues women are welcome to stay longer, but generally I find that women feel more comfortable in their own homes, in their own beds. I visit at home every day for a week and continue care for 6 weeks. Since women book into hospital as a private patient, they are almost assured a private room with an en-suite.

I’m really excited about this model of care because it meets the needs of women so perfectly:

  • Women having their first babies, maybe feeling unsure of what to expect
  • Women who previously experienced dis-continuous care from care providers who were unknown to them
  • Women who are planning a natural birth but perhaps with a more challenging pregnancy
  • Women who want a home birth / birth centre birth but with a known obstetrician available if needed
  • Women who really desire a sense of control over their birthing experience
  • This is a new way of working for both midwives and obstetricians and is a really supportive and nurturing way to practice. There is a huge potential for professional growth and learning. The most positive element, however, is the radiant smiles on the faces of the women who have birthed with us and the babies who have received a safe and gentle start to life.

    Midwife collaboration ‘bound to fail’

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Forcing midwives into compulsory collaborative arrangements is “bound to fail”, with some doctors unwilling to collaborate …

    Karen Lane, a midwifery lecturer … has criticised the new … arrangements for midwives, which she says are “likely to crush an emergent collaborative culture”.

    … she says last year’s AMA-negotiated determination wrongly assumes that midwives would be unwilling to work together with doctors …

    However, she argues it is the obstetricians rather than the midwives who have showed a lack of cooperation.

    … a recent study of 15 maternity units in SA, Victoria and NSW during 2009-2010, showed that collaboration is possible without “legislative force”.

    In some cases senior midwives and obstetric staff worked together successfully.

    But one of the main problems, she says, was the lack of cooperation from obstetricians and it was their “potential destructiveness” that triggered some directors to take steps in developing collaboration arrangements.

    “The radiant success of many dedicated caseload units in achieving organic collaboration makes a mockery of the idea that midwives must be commanded to collaborate and that obstetricians are models of collaborative virtue,” …

    Collaborative arrangements are needed if women wish to claim medicare benefits for midwifery care.

    Baby death shows need for collaborative care

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    The death of a baby during delivery demonstrates the need for collaborative arrangements between doctors and midwives …

    A coronor ruled this week that a baby girl who died of asphyxia … had not been “adequately monitored” during labour and could have potentially been saved if the midwife had referred the case to an obstetrician earlier on.

    … coroner John Hutton, made 21 recommendations, many of which involved models of collaborative care to ensure women and their babies are better protected from inadequate care.

    President of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), Dr Rupert Sherwood said the inquest highlighted why the college has always insisted on collaborative arrangements between doctors and midwives.

    … “This highlights two critical aspects of good collaborative care between midwives and doctors.

    “Namely the importance of following established protocols such as fetal heart monitoring when indicated, and timely referral to another member of the team with training and expertise to intervene in a safe and timely manner’ …

    New limits for older mothers

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    DOCTORS should induce older mums by 40 weeks or risk stillbirths, findings from the country’s biggest study into perinatal deaths has revealed.

    … the current policy of inducing labour at 41 weeks for all pregnant women needs to be reviewed for mothers aged 40 or older.

    … pregnant women aged 40 or older faced much higher risk of stillbirths once they reached their due date compared to younger mothers.

    … the general policy in hospitals was to induce birth at 41 weeks, with the risk of stillbirth 2.2 times higher for all mothers past their due dates. But the prognosis was more dire for older mothers, with the risk sharply rising from 38 weeks.

    … One of the key findings was that babies who died in stillbirth tended to move less in the final trimester, despite the widely held belief that babies slowed their movements towards the end of pregnancy.

    “People often get told that the baby slows down,” … “We found that … for people who have a healthy pregnancy outcome – it seems to be much more common that for the last few weeks prior to the interview, the baby movements become stronger.”

    … viral infections were not as significant as previously thought because they appeared to be just as common in healthy births.

    Urinary tract infections were more common in the mothers who lost a baby …

    “Do it yourself” births prompt alarm

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    A growing number of women are choosing to give birth without the assistance of doctors or midwives, provoked by dissatisfaction with modern obstetric care, fear of unnecessary medical intervention and a desire to reclaim birth as a private, natural act.

    It’s a choice the professionals say is fraught with peril. They fear the fledgling “freebirth” movement may undo gains in mother-infant mortality. The women, however, believe unassisted childbirth is emotionally and physically the safest option for themselves and their babies.

    Some 33%, or 8708 out of 26 667 homebirths in the United States in 2007 were not attended by a physician or midwife … Two-thirds of those deliveries attended by someone other than a physician or midwife … were reported as “planned” …

    Canada lacks similar statistics, but a cursory search online turns up a surfeit of websites, forums … dedicated to freebirth …

    It’s a difficult trend to track with any certainty … because advocates of unassisted childbirth aim to avoid interaction with the medical system wherever possible.

    While some women forgo prenatal care entirely, others orchestrate a “planned oops” or “accidental” unassisted birth to avoid confrontation with health care providers and the law.

    Many are already mothers, wary after a bad experience with a doctor or midwife.

    “My first son’s hospital birth left something to be desired … the doctor I had was terrible. When I became pregnant a second time, I sought out a midwife and while one of the women in the practice was great, the other really talked down to my husband and I … ” … “I was probably seven months pregnant when I decided I didn’t want [that midwife] at my birth. I didn’t want it to be a guessing game.”

    Others fear being coerced into medical procedures they’re not comfortable with.

    “There are some people who can go into the birthing room and put their foot down, but I know when I go into a doctor’s office for an appointment, I get overwhelmed, let alone in a case where they’re saying your baby might die,” … “I think it’s easier to trust yourself if there’s not another voice there. Having that other set of interests involved makes me uncomfortable.”

    Doctors and midwives bring their own timelines and expectations about how a delivery should proceed, and will err on the side of intervening in birth to protect themselves against litigation … “I can see the position they’re in, because if you don’t deliver a perfect baby there’s a chance you’ll get sued, and there’s this idea that if you’ve transferred someone to the hospital or done a C-section then you’ve done everything you could.”

    … primary C-section rates ranged from a high of 23% of deliveries in Newfoundland and Labrador to a low of 14% in Manitoba.

    With up to 15% of all births involving potentially fatal complications, however, “the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of giving birth with a skilled attendant present,” …

    Proponents of unassisted childbirth say it’s all a matter of perspective. They prefer to view birth as a “spiritual, sexual experience, not an inherently dangerous medical event,” says Shanley. “I trust the same intelligence that knows how to grow the baby from an egg and a sperm into a human being also knows how to complete the process.”

    Unnecessary intervention in birth is more often the cause of complications than a remedy, she adds. “People counting, measuring and managing birth into this controlled, manipulated act, it’s no wonder women’s bodies shutdown — the way anybody’s would if someone kept interrupting them while they were trying to have sex, go to the bathroom or go to sleep.”

    Intervention should be the last resort, not a given … ” … one of the nurses asked why we didn’t go to the hospital and my husband looked her in the eye and said: ‘Because it wasn’t an emergency.’”

    The couple prepared for complications by reading books for first responders on how to deliver babies in emergency situations.

    Others look for such information online.

    “I had to assess what my personal risks were,” says Rundle. “I’m a healthy young woman, so when people say that 15% of the time there’s a complication, are they talking about women who have different medical histories than I have?”

    Some women, like Shanley, prefer to put complete faith in their bodies and refer to complications as “variations of normal.”

    “There are going to be babies who die during an unassisted birth who may not have if there had been intervention, but there are also going to be babies who die because of interventions,” she explains. “There’s no way to ensure a successful birth every time. Sometimes a baby dies and that’s just the way it is.”

    It’s not a stance Shanley takes lightly, having lost a child to a congenital heart defect following an unassisted delivery, and been told by a coroner that the baby would have died even if she had gone to the hospital.

    It’s a difficult stance to counter, says Canadian Association of Midwives president Anne Wilson. “You can’t say to a mum that 60% of all unassisted births result in complications where the baby dies because that kind of statistic doesn’t exist. A lot of complications in childbirth are predictable and occur over time, but a few happen without warning, such as severe hemorrhage. And if a woman doesn’t have prenatal care, doesn’t report the birth to the hospital, there’s no way to know.”

    … “Unassisted childbirth is unsafe — period,” … “The people advocating this as a mainstream option for women are tragically uninformed.”

    Midwives, however, are more “fuzzy” on the issue, says Wilson. The association has yet to take an official stance for fear of alienating women wary of intervention. “If someone came to us who was considering an unassisted birth we would want to keep that person engaged, build a relationship of trust and if they ended up going ahead with it, at least you’re someone they can call if they get half way through a delivery and change their mind.”

    Failing that, “some prenatal care is better than none,” she adds.

    The debate raises ethical questions of “autonomy versus beneficence” for midwives, Wilson says. “By the nature of what we do, we tend to look after people who don’t want interventions. It would come down to individual choice in terms of how comfortable you are as a practitioner taking that person into your care.”

    For Shanley, however, unassisted childbirth is more a question of reproductive rights. “It’s your body, your birth and your baby, so you should have the right to give birth however you want.”

    Continuity of midwifery care and gestational weight gain in obese women: a randomised controlled trial

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The increased prevalence of obesity in pregnant women in Australia … is a significant public health concern. Obese women are at increased risk of serious perinatal complications and guidelines recommend weight gain restriction and additional care.

    There is limited evidence to support the effectiveness of dietary and physical activity lifestyle interventions in preventing adverse perinatal outcomes and new strategies need to be evaluated. The primary aim of this project is to evaluate the effect of continuity of midwifery care on restricting gestational weight gain in obese women to the recommended range.

    The secondary aims of the study are to assess the impact of continuity of midwifery care on: women’s experience of pregnancy care; women’s satisfaction with care and a range of psychological factors.

    Methods: A two arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted with primigravid women recruited from maternity services in Victoria, Australia. Participants will be primigravid women, with a BMI[greater than or equal to]30 who are less than 17 weeks gestation.

    Women allocated to the intervention arm will be cared for in a midwifery continuity of care model and receive an informational leaflet on managing weight gain in pregnancy. Women allocated to the control group will receive routine care in addition to the same informational leaflet.

    Weight gain during pregnancy, standards of care, medical and obstetric information will be extracted from medical records …

    Increasingly, midwifery continuity models of care are being introduced in low risk maternity care, and information on their application in high risk populations is required. There is an identified need to trial alternative antenatal interventions to reduce perinatal risk factors for women who are obese and the findings from this project may have application in other maternity services.

    A fantastic research study and I would be very interested to learn the results. It is well-known that continuity of midwifery care is beneficial for low-risk women; the unanswered question remains: how does continuity of midwifery and obstetric care benefit women with complicated pregnancies? My hunch is that this form of care is most beneficial for women and babies.

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Specific Genetic Mutations Associated With Preeclampsia

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Specific genetic mutations in women with autoimmune diseases are associated with preeclampsia … investigation … has revealed an association between similar mutations and preeclampsia in women without any underlying autoimmune disease …

    … The authors studied specific genes … and found that 7 of the 40 [women] had a mutation in one of these genes … 5 of 59 women who did not have an autoimmune disease but who developed preeclampsia, had mutations in MCP or factor I.

    … the results … suggest new genetic targets for the treatment of preeclampsia and raise the possibility of developing tests to identify women at risk of developing preeclampsia …

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Maternity review

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    THE Swan Hill maternity ward has undergone a review to determine its future.

    The study … comes after a shortage of obstetric practitioners has left Swan Hill District Health’s maternity services in crisis.

    Several obstetric GPs have retired in the last few years, leaving the ward with only a handful of doctors with suitable training …

    “In a community like ours … it is essential that we have good obstetric services,” …

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Get men in the delivery room, say Bangladesh’s first midwives

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    One-in-500 women die in childbirth in Bangladesh – with cultural factors as much to blame as a lack of medical care.

    There’s hardly a man to be seen in the maternity ward of the Maternal and Child Health Training Institute in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh.

    Despite the lack of any law forbidding men to enter the delivery room, fathers are normally not present during the birth of their own child – an attitude that needs to change …

    “Men need to be involved in the labour process if we are to reduce maternal mortality,” says Mala Reberio, one of the 20 midwives being trained to international standards in Bangladesh, which is still heavily reliant on community skilled birth attendants, who lack the skill and the authority to perform more complicated deliveries. Currently, one in 500 women in Bangladesh dies during childbirth.

    “If [men] could see firsthand the complications of childbirth, they would be more likely to send their pregnant wives to proper medical facilities and less likely to insist on early childbirth after marriage,” … More than 75% of deliveries take place at home, and the average age of women having their first child is just 16 years …

    … Bangladesh is on target to … reducing maternal mortality … the maternal mortality ratio in Bangladesh has declined from 322 per 100,000 in 2001 to 194 in 2010 …

    The Bangladesh government aims to have 3,000 fully qualified midwives who can provide round-the-clock assistance in all 427 sub-districts by 2015 …

    The programme still faces a number of major obstacles, despite being well received by the general public. First, doctors who can earn large sums of money by delivering a baby through a caesarean-section may be unwilling to lose that income if midwives are available to do the surgery for free. Second, the potential fallout from introducing a new cadre of midwives or professionals into an already hierarchical sector could prove difficult.

    The government’s biggest challenge, though, remains getting women into the healthcare facilities and continuing to bring about behavioural changes in men and women …

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Stillborn baby girl ‘frozen’ back to life

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A stillborn baby girl was brought back to life after doctors spent 25 minutes reviving her, before ‘freezing’ her to reduce the risk of brain damage.

    Rachel Claxton’s placenta ruptured and became detached during baby Ella’s delivery …

    ‘I’d held her for no more than two seconds when the midwife told Jason to pull the emergency cord,’ Miss Claxton, 32, said, ‘I begged them to tell me what was happening but I already knew she was dead because it had been so long and I still hadn’t heard her cry. All of a sudden there were doctors everywhere …

    But just hours later, Ella’s parents received further devastating news when doctors told them their daughter had suffered hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy – brain damage caused by lack of oxygen and lack of blood supply. They were told to prepare for the worst, and Ella was … ‘frozen’ to reduce the swelling in her brain.

    After spending 11 days in hospital, Ella was allowed home, and has continued to thrive. She is now nine-months-old and although has physiotherapy, her brain function is normal …

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Obstetricians take big steps to avoid malpractice

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Delivering babies can be a high-stakes undertaking for hospitals, with the threat of multi-million-dollar malpractice damages when serious mishaps occur. But a team of Manhattan obstetricians says it has beaten the odds—dramatically reducing errors and slashing their department’s medical malpractice payouts by more than 99%.

    “Any hospital could do it—it’s not about money, it’s about changing the culture to make it safer to deliver babies,” …

    The new measures reduced errors and helped ward off unwarranted suits by clearly documenting everything doctors did right in cases where a bad outcome was not their fault … these safety initiatives reduced so-called “sentinel events”—such as avoidable deaths and serious injuries—to zero in 2008-09, down from five in 2000.

    Consumer advocates are hailing the report as a breakthrough in patient safety and a better way to curb malpractice costs than tort reform. “People don’t get sued if they don’t get hurt,” …

    … the safety changes resulted in annual medical malpractice payouts dropping from an average of a $28 million from 2003 to 2006 to $2.6 million a year from 2007 to 2009. With no sentinel events reported in 2008 and 2009, those totals are expected to drop still further.

    Among the easier changes was doing away with the labor and delivery unit’s dry-erase whiteboard, which staff used to communicate patients’ progress …

    Instead, the team came up with a new electronic application to do the same job better, a record that can be accessed through any Internet browser. No paper charting is allowed, both for improved communication and with an eye to leaving a clear legal record in case of a poor medical outcome.

    Some of the staffing changes cost money. The unit hired a full-time patient safety nurse to educate staff on new protocols the doctors wanted and to conduct emergency drills, such as what to do when a mother started to hemorrhage …

    Reasoning that doctors tend to make mistakes when they are deprived of sleep, the department hired three physician assistants and a “laborist,” which is a new term for an obstetrician who works for a hospital full-time, instead of just having admitting privileges there. At Weill Cornell, the laborist works nights and weekends, reducing the time other obstetricians need to be “on call” in their off hours.

    Though many aspects of the plan were costly, the authors concluded that the savings in medical malpractice payments “dwarf the incremental cost of the patient safety program.”

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Midwives May Need Alternative Training

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Midwives and obstetricians may need formal training in complementary therapies because they are becoming so popular among pregnant women …

    Acupuncture, yoga, chiropractic and herbs all get involved during pregnancy and childbirth …

    In Germany almost all obstetric departments offer acupuncture or homeopathy …

    And in Australia, New Zealand and the USA more than 70 per cent of midwifes make use of alternative therapies.

    … few professionals had training in these topics – in spite of supporting them – and many did not understand the risks they might pose to pregnant women.

    … “… the holistic nature of CAM has a close affinity with the philosophy, professional goals and care perspectives of many midwives.” …

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    CMACE Release: Saving Mothers’ Lives Report – Reviewing Maternal Deaths 2006-2008, UK

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The overall number of maternal deaths in the UK has fallen over the last three years despite a rise in the number of women dying from infection …

    The maternal mortality rate was 11.39 per 100,000 maternities compared to 13.95 per 100,000 maternities for the previous triennium, 2003-05. As this enquiry is far more inclusive than in other countries, for direct comparison with international figures, the UK maternal death rate was 6.7 per 100,000 live births.

    … The direct death rate decreased from 6.24 per 100,000 maternities in 2003-2005 to 4.67 per 100,000 maternities in 2006-2008. The leading cause was infection. Many of these deaths were from Group A Streptococcal disease caught in the community, mirroring a rise in the general population. The report calls for mothers and healthcare workers to be aware of the need for scrupulous hygiene especially after birth, and most importantly if new mothers are in contact with people with sore throats. It also calls for national guidelines to be drawn up for the identification and management of sepsis in pregnant and recently delivered women.

    There has been a welcome, significant, decline in deaths from pulmonary embolism and to a lesser degree, haemorrhage, following the publication and implementation of guidelines that were recommended in previous reports …

    … “The reason why the maternal mortality rate in the UK is comparatively low is because we make every effort to understand and then act on the root causes of why some mothers die during and after pregnancy. Much hard work has been undertaken to produce these maternal enquiries. This eighth report has highlighted some of the successes over the last few years in preventing death but we must not become complacent. More needs to be done to ensure that maternal death is kept as low as possible.”

    … “This report has highlighted several key areas for those working in maternity services to heed, in particular, the need for GPs and midwives to identify women requiring specialist care and the need for quick referrals. These recommendations provide us with a snapshot of maternity services and are meant to help healthcare professionals improve standards of care.”

    … “Some of the areas which were identified in the previous report … have been acted upon. Consequently, the follow-up … shows the true impact of these maternal enquiries. They provide us with good data and help us to monitor trends so that we can prevent maternal death.”

    … The report provides 10 key recommendations for policy makers, service commissioners and providers and healthcare professionals:

    - Pre-pregnancy counselling – Women with pre-existing medical illness … should be informed of how this may relate to their pregnancy.

    - Pre-existing medical conditions – Women whose pregnancies are likely to be complicated … should be immediately referred to appropriate specialist centres where care can be optimised. Referrals should be made a priority.

    - Specialist clinical care – There remains an urgent need for the routine use of a national modified early obstetric warning score (MEOWS) chart in all pregnant or postpartum women who become unwell and require either obstetric or gynaecology services. This will help in the recognition, treatment and referral of women who have, or are developing, a critical illness during or after pregnancy.

    - Genital tract infection/sepsis – All pregnant and recently delivered women need to be informed of the risks and signs and symptoms of genital tract infection and how to prevent its transmission and all health care professionals should be aware of the signs and symptoms of sepsis …

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Study Raises Questions About Childbirth Drug

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Want to know more about home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A study … is raising questions about a drug commonly used in childbirth.

    Pitocin is a synthetic form of oxytocin, which a mother’s body produces to start labor and cause contractions.

    A study … found a strong link between high amounts of the drug during labor and severe postpartum hemorrhage for the mother, which can be a terrifying and dangerous complication.

    … “… women who had prolonged infusions of pitocin [were] actually at increased risk of bleeding after delivery,” …

    … when women receive a lot of pitocin during labor, they can become desensitized, causing it to fail to work when it counts most, immediately after a baby is born.

    The drug is supposed to help clamp down the uterus and stop the bleeding.

    “We do feel it is a strong finding,” …

    Severe hemorrhage happens to just 1 percent of mothers, but it is the No. 1 cause of maternal death in childbirth worldwide.

    Pitocin is given to 60 to 70 percent of laboring mothers …

    “Anytime they can use less oxytocin, it’s beneficial,” …

    … while pitocin is necessary at times, there are ways mothers-to-be can reduce their chances of needing the drug during labor.

    # Avoid elective inductions when there is no medical reason
    # Labor at home until the labor pattern is well-established
    # Move around and stay upright during labor
    # Hold off on epidural until dilated to at least 4 centimeters
    # Consider a certified nurse midwife instead of an obstetrician if the pregnancy has no complications.

    Midwives … reported using pitocin in only 5 to 8 percent of births, instead of the 40 to 70 percent rates cited by other doctors and nurses in 6News’ research.

    To find out more about the services I offer, please visit my website or call me on 0400 418 448.

    Delivery Even a Bit Early May Mean Developmental Delays

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Bucking the notion that being born a few weeks early has no discernible impact on babies, a new study indicates that “late preterm” infants face more developmental delays than their full-term peers and those delays may affect their school performance.

    … late preterm babies were 52 percent more likely than term infants to suffer severe delays and 43 percent more likely to experience milder limitations. In motor skills, the preterm toddlers faced 56 percent increased odds of severe delays and a 58 percent increased risk of milder ones.

    … 5 percent to 40 percent of U.S. births are now early elective deliveries, meaning that births are induced preterm without a valid medical reason …

    Noting that many of these at-risk infants receive little or no specialized developmental follow-up, Woythaler’s data included babies with at least 34 weeks’ gestation from wide economic and racial backgrounds who received complete assessments near the age of 2.

    The brain of a baby at 34 weeks’ gestation weighs 35 percent less than it would at term …

    Social factors and gender had the greatest impact on the children’s mental scores … with language spoken at home playing a key role … In contrast, gestational age was the most important contributor to physical delays.

    … Researchers have found such infants are at higher risk for respiratory problems, worse academic performance and school suspension down the road.

    “There’s a reason why normal gestation is 40 weeks,” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Vaginal delivery connected to lower morbidity in twins

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Twins tend to do better if born vaginally, rather than by caesarean section … But regardless of delivery mode, the first-born twin is less likely to suffer complications than the second.

    … Neonatal morbidity was lower in the first than the second twin (3.0% versus 4.6%). This was also true of mortality (0.35% versus 0.6%).

    In either twin there were no differences between vertex and non-vertex and attempted vaginal delivery versus planned caesarean section.

    In the first twin, neonatal morbidity was lower after vaginal delivery than caesarean section (1.1% versus 2.1%).

    When the first twin underwent vaginal delivery and the co-twin underwent caesarean section (combined delivery), morbidity was significantly higher in the co-twin (19.8%) than in the case of vaginal delivery (9%) or caesarean delivery of both newborns (7.2%).

    “In the absence of more definitive data, our systematic review suggests that an attempt at vaginal delivery should be considered in twin pregnancies,” …

    “With regard to the second twin, no differences are noted between caesarean section and vaginal delivery …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Greatly Reduces Infant Mortality

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … There have been a handful of small studies … that looked at the effectiveness of fetal heart rate monitors, but none of them were large enough to be conclusive.

    Chauhan and his colleagues … used a sample of 1,945,789 singleton infant birth and death records … Multivariable log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate risk ratio to evaluate the association between electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM) and mortality …

    … 89% of singleton pregnancies had EFM. EFM was associated with significantly lower infant mortality (adjusted RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.69, 0.81); this was mainly driven by the lower risk of early neonatal mortality (adjusted RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.44, 0.57) associated with EFM. In low-risk pregnancies, EFM was associated with decreased risk for low (< 4) 5 min Apgar scores (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.49, 0.51), whereas in high risk pregnancies EFM was also associated with decreased risk of neonatal seizures (adjusted RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.46, 0.94).

    The study demonstrates that the use of EFM decreased early neonatal mortality by 53%.

    The authors have not pointed to the increased intervention that may have been used to prevent these adverse outcomes. EFM in itself does not save lives; EFM is merely the prompt that alerts health practitioners to take further action. This action is usually in the form of intervention to hasten birth. I was surprised that in this study, 89% women had EFM. Most pregnancies are considered to be low-risk and therefore not in need of EFM. The alternative – intermittent auscultation – was not defined. In NSW, the policy is to intermittently listen in for the baby’s heart beat every 15 minutes after a contraction, and to listen for a full minute. Under this policy, women are able to be upright and mobile for their labours and births and this has a positive impact on the woman’s experience of birth.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Researchers Find Clues To Mystery Of Preterm Delivery

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … excessive formation of calcium crystal deposits in the amniotic fluid may be a reason why some pregnant women suffer preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) leading to preterm delivery.

    This is a key breakthrough in solving the mystery of preterm birth …

    … infection, maternal stress and placental bleeding can trigger some preterm deliveries, but the cause of many other preterm deliveries remains unknown. In these cases, women experience early contractions, cervical dilation and a torn amniotic sac …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Value of bed rest for pregnant women questioned

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    The value of bed rest has been disputed for many years. When I did my midwifery degree in 2000, We were taught that there was very little value, if anything, in bed rest. It only serves to increase levels of depression and increase the woman’s socialisation into the medical model of care via fear. It’s not helpful! Gentle activity is safe; nothing too vigorous, and nothing too stressful.

    Link

    Margaret Simon spent the last four months of her pregnancy lying in bed on a doctor’s orders, hoping to prevent a miscarriage and a preterm birth. As a result, Simon lost her job, struggled to care for her two older children and grew so unfit that she got winded taking showers.

    “Everything that made me who I am, being a wife, mother and employee, all got yanked out from under me,” said Simon, 34, who had been the family bread-winner and described bed rest as the “darkest, most conflicting” time of her life.

    As many as 95 percent of obstetricians report having prescribed bed rest or restricted activity to women with complications that may increase the risk for preterm labor, such as high blood pressure, carrying multiples and vaginal bleeding …

    Yet experts say there’s little evidence that immobility leads to better outcomes for those women. And although bed rest is often assumed to be a safe intervention, it can be a physical, emotional and financial nightmare for expectant mothers …

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states that “bed rest, hydration and pelvic rest does not appear to improve the rate of preterm birth and should not be routinely recommended.” … pregnant women should not be systematically prescribed bed rest “due to the adverse effects that bed rest could have on women and their families, and the increased cost for the healthcare system.”

    Most doctors are aware of the scant evidence. Yet they perpetuate the old-fashioned practice, mostly because they have no better options … [and] it’s the way things have always been done. A fear of liability and medical malpractice lawsuits plays a role too.

    “There’s no evidence-based way to keep someone from delivering prematurely,” …

    “The risks of placing a woman on bed rest outweigh the current evidence it improves outcomes,” …

    Bed rest isn’t the peaceful vacation one might fantasize about. Women on “modified” bed rest may need to rest for an hour, three times a day. Others stay horizontal 24/7, rising only to use the bathroom. They can’t ride in a car, have sex, walk up stairs, lift a laundry basket, cook dinner or stand in the shower, let alone take care of children or work. Some women take it so seriously they crawl to the bathroom.

    Proponents say bed rest can buy extra time for a pregnancy; the closer a baby is born to term, the better. Lying down, they say, can reduce women’s stress, increase blood flow to the uterus, diminish uterine activity and decrease pressure on the cervix.

    And then, some say bed rest is just common sense, based on the perception that contractions mean a baby is on the way. Sarah Jacobs, of Brooklyn, N.Y., said that whenever she was up for too long, her contractions increased.

    “It was really clear to me that lying down kept the baby inside,” said Jacobs, who was on bed rest for six months during her third pregnancy.

    But experts say that most preterm births occur in women without risk factors and that contractions are a poor predictor of preterm birth, as they don’t always produce the changes in the cervix that lead a baby to be born.

    “While women might experience worse contractions with activity or standing, it is important to differentiate contractions from labor,” … “Having (contractions) doesn’t always mean you are in labor.”

    … The longer women are on bed rest, the more severe their symptoms and the longer it takes them to recover … after you lie around for a while, you begin to ache and your muscles begin to atrophy — starting as soon as 48 hours — so it’s easy to injure the muscles in the postpartum,” …

    In addition to losing their conditioning, women on bed rest may experience bone loss and have trouble sleeping. Meanwhile, they tend to lose weight, and low maternal weight can affect the fetus and is associated with preterm birth.

    “Doctors don’t realize the dangers,” …

    Perhaps the toughest part of bed rest is psychological. The abrupt and sometimes catastrophic disruption of their life, coupled with the stress that comes with a “high-risk” pregnancy, can leave women feeling isolated, helpless and unusually dependent. It often strains the marriage and is hard on other children in the family. Like astronauts in space, women on bed rest may feel estranged from their familiar routines and may experience sensory deprivation and depression …

    … Ultimately, Simon’s 9-pound, 14-ounce baby did not come prematurely; she had to be induced at 39 weeks. As awful as bed rest was, she would do it again “because he’s here,” she said. “And he’s healthy.”

    Don’t you love the language? She “had” to be induced at 39 weeks. What was the indication? Pregnancy? It was Monday? 39 weeks is not a reason to induce a baby!!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    When expectant mothers go beyond their expected date of delivery…

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    When expectant mothers go beyond their expected date of delivery… the world ends. Well, I think that’s what the author of this article wants us to believe. This is a seriously bad article that I had to share. Everything about it – the accuracy of the information, the language and the style – are cringe-worthy. If your baby hasn’t arrived “on time”, please don’t read this article. Skip to the next one.

    Link

    You have probably heard of a lady who has gone beyond their expected date of delivery (EDD). This is known as post term pregnancy. “Post-term pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy that extends to 42 weeks and beyond,” …

    Actually, no. Post-term pregnancy is one that continues past 42 weeks. A pregnancy is post-dates after 40 weeks, but it is not post-term until after 42 weeks. A baby can be post-mature at any time, but generally a post-mature baby is born after 42 weeks. Not always though – many post-42 week babies show no signs of post-maturity.

    Dr Mike Kagawa, an Obstetrician and Gynaecologist … explains that a number of reasons could be behind this. But first it is important to have this at the back of one’s mind. “When we tell expectant mums when the baby will come, it is an estimate,” he says.

    Thank goodness for this piece of truth.

    The commonest cause thus far is when the dates are wrong …

    Another cause of this variation is technology, more so the ultrasound. “The results depend on the individual, the machine used and the timing. When a scan is done too early or too late, it may not be accurate,” …

    The earliest scan, and preferably one from the first trimester, should be used if ultrasound is used for pregnancy dating. If the woman is sure of her last period date, has regular periods, has had at least three periods since ceasing breastfeeding and was not on the pill for at least 3 months prior to becoming pregnant, a dating ultrasound may not be necessary.

    But as fate would have it, some people genuinely go beyond their due date.

    Actually, as fate would have it, a normal pregnancy lasts somewhere between 37 and 42 weeks. It’s perfectly “normal” to go beyond 40 weeks.

    “There are two categories of these,” he explains, “The first group do not start labour until induced.” This he says, can not easily be explained but once induced, the labour proceeds normally.

    Ah, so those women would simply stay pregnant forever if they were not induced? I don;t know any woman who has been pregnant for ever. Do you? I know of plenty of care providers who have not been patient.

    In the second group are those that have medical problems … sometimes the baby may delay because they have congenital they are born with anomalies, health complications especially those involving the brain. An example, he says, is a condition medically termed anencephaly, where the brain lacks its outer covering (or skull). “The pregnancy can even be overdue by two months.”

    And we know this because we regularly have women gestating to 48 weeks! The medical conditions mentioned are very rare.

    In Dr Caughey’s article, other factors like the baby being male, genetics, previous post-term pregnancy and the fact that one is giving birth for the first time (primiparity) also lead to post-term pregnancy. “All that said, we do not want babies going beyond their due-date,” … as the baby grows, so does the placenta because it is the route by which the baby gets nutrients. At 40 weeks, this growth is no longer proportional. The baby keeps growing, but the placenta does not and yet the baby needs even more nutrients. Inadequacy of the placenta puts the baby at risk of starvation. For this reason, doctors give it up to 42 weeks, if the dates were accurate, then induce labour.

    Ok, so this paragraph is kind of ok. There are tests that women can have to determine the condition of the placenta and to ensure that the baby is ok for now. Unfortunately these tests are limited, as with all testing, and there is a margin of error. Also, they only tell us how the baby and placenta re right now, not necessarily how they will be next week or even next month. That said, some women will opt for testing and monitoring and if all’s well, they’ll continue without an induction.

    In cases of post-term pregnancy, the delivery is likely to be difficult. “The bones of the baby are harder and it is difficult to manoeuver through the birth canal,” Dr. Kagawa says. These babies may also not be as healthy or robust as those born on time and are kept in the neonatal health care unit for monitoring for some time.

    Ouch! The scare tactics. The other approach would be to suggest that until the baby is in a good position for birthing, labour will not start. This is a protective mechanism. If we go inducing the labour with the baby in a non-optimal position, the labour is more likely to be difficult and tor result in a caesarean. An alternate approach would be to encourage the baby to adopt an anterior position and then await spontaneous labour.

    The article does not mention the increased chance of having meconium in the waters of post-dates and post-term babies. This is more likely after 40 weeks than before 40 weeks. It is not a problem in itself, but it can become a problem if the baby should become distressed in labour and gasp. It’s recommended that women who have meconium staining have continuous monitoring to keep a closer eye on the baby and any distress that might be occurring. The use of telemetry will ensure that mobility and access to the bath and shower are not restricted.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    After the first caesarean, a second one is much more likely

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    TRACY HART had intended to have her first child … naturally. But when Ariane failed to move into the normal birth position, Mrs Hart was told that a caesarean was the safest option.

    Second time around, Mrs Hart, 35, was eager to try again for a natural birth, but at 41 weeks and two days into her pregnancy, she still had not gone into labour. A caesarean was ordered – because doctors thought an induction might have been too hard on her scarred uterus – and four days ago son, Saxon was born …

    … Mrs Hart said, ”I was mortified and cried, because I had mentally prepared myself for a natural birth. A lot of women who don’t have any problems giving birth don’t realise some women just don’t have a choice.”

    Unfortunately Mrs Hart didn’t know that all women have a choice about how their baby enters the world. Some choices are safer than others; some are safer for the mother while others are safer for the baby; but whatever way you look at it, all women have a choice.

    First-time mothers with no obvious health problems, and subsequent births like Mrs Hart’s where the first was by caesarean, are overwhelmingly the biggest contributors to the NSW epidemic of caesarean births, state data shows for the first time.

    Twins, and babies in the breech or other difficult positions in the uterus, account for a much smaller proportion of the one in three babies now born by caesarean section …

    During that time, the overall caesarean rate increased from 19 to 30 per cent of all births. But subsequent caesareans increased much faster, at an average 5.3 per cent a year during the study period.

    Among first-time mothers, caesareans grew fastest – on average 6.8 per cent a year – among those who did not go into labour or whose labour was induced, suggesting a big rise in planned procedures. Among first births where the woman went into labour and later delivered surgically, the increase was only 3.5 per cent a year.

    … the new data provided the first comprehensive state-wide picture of factors behind the surge in caesareans, which NSW Health has pledged to bring back to 20 per cent of all births by 2050. It suggested that concentrating on promoting normal birth among first-time mothers would have the biggest impact on reducing the overall rate …

    I have always known that promoting normal birth – via private midwifery care – to all first time Mums, all women who have had a previous caesarean, and all women who have had a previously traumatic birth – would dramatically lower the cesarean rate.

    The research … showed it was highly unlikely the increase in caesareans could be legitimately attributed to complications such as the older age and the increase in overweight mothers … because most of the rise had occurred in women with apparently few medical risks …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Do IVF Pregnancies Raise Death Risk for Mothers?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Maternal deaths resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) are relatively rare, but they do occur …

    … In the new report, Susan Bewley, an obstetrician at Kings College in London, and colleagues cite a study in the Netherlands that shows that the rate of pregnant women dying during IVF pregnancies is higher than during pregnancies in the general population. Specifically, there were 42 deaths per 100,000 IVF pregnancies, compared with six deaths seen among 100,000 pregnancies in the general population.

    Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome can occur as a result of fertility drugs used to stimulate the development of eggs in a woman’s ovaries. If the ovaries are overstimulated they can become enlarged and symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting can occur. In severe cases fluid may accumulate around the lungs or heart.

    The authors call for tracking of IVF-associated risks including ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome to better understand risks associated with IVF. “More stringent attention to stimulation regimens, preconceptual care, and pregnancy management is needed so that maternal death and severe morbidity do not worsen further,” they write.

    … U.S. fertility doctors point out that the reasons women undergo IVF may account for the increased risk of death seen in the studies.

    … Underlying health issues in women who turn to IVF to get pregnant may affect their risk profile, he says. These women may have had previous uterine surgery or are predisposed to high blood pressure or diabetes. Women who undergo IVF are also usually older than their counterparts who conceive without such assistance. Advancing maternal age is associated with riskier pregnancies.

    “The population of people who need IVF may add special contributing factors to the risk of death during their pregnancy,” he says. Multiple pregnancies are more likely as a result of IVF, which also increases risks to moms and babies.

    The new findings may not apply to the U.S. due to differences in obstetrical care, he says.

    “We manage risks better [here], and do reductions more in multiple pregnancies,” Grifo says. The best way to protect the mother’s health and that of the baby regardless of how the pregnancy occurred is good prenatal care …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Obese Women Have Longer Gestation Period

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    According to a recent study, overweight women have a higher chance of having a longer gestation period. The study also says that obese women are more likely to have induced labour and also a caesarean section.

    … one in three women were pregnant even after 10 days of due date as compared to their healthy counterparts.

    … more than one third of obese women had to undergo an induced labour as compared to one fourth of women who were healthy …

    There is a great value in preconception care. For women who are overweight or obese, or even a healthy weight but seeking improved health and well being prior to pregnancy, preconception care is essential. Midwives and obstetricians provide preconception care.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Induced labor may double the odds of C-section

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    First-time mothers who have their labor induced may face a greater risk of needing a cesarean section than those who go into labor naturally …

    … those who had their labor induced were twice as likely to ultimately need a C-section.

    … 44 percent had their labor induced — and the researchers estimate that failed induction accounted for 20 percent of the C-sections performed.

    The findings … firm up the link seen in past studies between labor induction and an increased risk of C-section. By definition, labor induction is performed before a woman’s body is ready for spontaneous labor, and in some cases there will be problems with labor progression that necessitate a C-section.

    The connection is important because while cesarean section is a generally safe procedure, it requires a longer recovery time than vaginal birth, and does present certain risks, such as blood clots, infection at the incision site or in the lining of the uterus, and breathing problems in the baby.

    Moreover, the rates of both labor induction and C-section have been on an upward trend in the U.S. since the 1990s. Labor inductions have risen from just under 10 percent of births in 1990 to 22 percent in 2006; and in 2007, C-sections were done in almost one-third of all births.

    … There are circumstances in which labor induction may be advisable. There is good evidence, for example, that inducing labor benefits mom and baby when pregnancy goes beyond 41 weeks …

    … when a mother has pregnancy-related high blood pressure or diabetes, or when the mother’s “water breaks” but labor does not spontaneously begin.

    I’d like to add that none of these are absolute reasons for inducing labour. High blood pressure that is stable and has no other complicating factors, does not necessarily require an induction. The research supports induction sometime after 41 weeks and before 42 weeks, not not strictly at 41 weeks. Furthermore, ruptured membranes does not necessarily require induction although the risk of infection does increase the longer the waters are broken.

    In general, elective labor induction refers to those done with no clear medical reason. It may be done for convenience, for example, or in cases where late pregnancy is causing significant physical discomfort or when a woman wants to ensure that her own doctor delivers the baby.

    Of the labor inductions performed in this study, 40 percent were elective …

    … the bottom line for pregnant women is that they should understand the reasons for and potential risks of all forms of delivery. “It’s really important to have a frank discussion with your doctor about all of your options for delivery,” she said.

    And, it would seem it is also important for care providers to understand the reasons and potential risks of induction. Many articles blame women for the outcome, however in reality women often do what their trusted care provider suggests.

    … women contemplating an elective labor induction should be aware of the relatively higher risk of C-section.

    Shouldn’t all women be aware of the higher risk of c/s with a planned induction? This would help them to determine whether they wish to proceed down the induction route, or explore other alternatives such as expectant management and monitoring.

    In an interview, she also pointed out that when first-time moms have a C- section, they often have repeat cesareans with any future pregnancies. So limiting the need for C-section in first-time pregnancies is particularly important.

    … the rate of labor induction in this study — at 44 percent — was striking.

    Even among the 4,600 women in the study considered “low risk” for needing a labor induction — because they were not post-term, were free of diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity, and the fetus was not overly large — 29 percent had their labor induced …

    Among these low-risk women, one-quarter of those who had a labor induction ended up needing a C-section, versus 14 percent of those who had a natural labor.

    … the current findings … underscore a widespread need … to try to cut rates of “inappropriate” labor induction. “Labor induction performed for no medical reason is an area for us to target,” …

    … according to ACOG guidelines, elective inductions and elective C-sections should not be scheduled before the 39th week of pregnancy, in order to reduce the odds of complications associated with relatively earlier birth.

    However … this guideline is “not followed rigorously.”

    A study published last month, for example, found that as the U.S. national rate of labor induction rose between 1992 and 2003, so did the proportion of births occurring at the earlier end of full-term …

    In 2003, the study found 30 percent of all full-term singleton births occurred during the 37th or 38th week, versus 19 percent in 1992. The researchers concluded that labor inductions performed before the 39th week were a “likely cause” of that trend.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    As early elective births increase, so do health risks for mother and baby

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A dramatic increase in the number of U.S. women and physicians choosing an early childbirth comes with new health risks for mothers and newborns …

    The average time a fetus spends in the womb has fallen seven days in the United States since 1992 …

    Researchers see an “evolutionarily dramatic event” in the trend, and perinatal health experts see dangers. Shortening gestation could affect lung development and some fine-tuning of brain functions …

    … Babies born too early often sleep longer than normal and have trouble learning how to breast-feed, causing dehydration and jaundice

    “For every day and every week before 39 weeks, it’s an increasing risk to the baby,” …

    … women are significantly more likely to experience C-sections at for-profit hospitals across the state. … the number of women in the state who die each year from causes directly related to childbirth had more than doubled since 1996.

    The rise in deaths during childbirth indicates that obstetric health has deteriorated in many important ways …

    … A normal pregnancy lasts 40 weeks, although researchers believe it probably is safe to induce delivery at a full 39 weeks. Women often naturally give birth earlier than this, and in some cases medical problems call for an early delivery. The problem comes when babies are forced out of the womb.

    Of all births from 1990 to 2006, the number of babies born at 36 weeks increased by about 30 percent, and babies born at 37 and 38 weeks rose more than 40 percent, according to national statistics. There was a corresponding drop in the number of babies born in later weeks. Now, more babies are born at 39 weeks than at full term.

    The data examined is considered fresh by academic standards and covers such a long period of time — 16 years — that experts say the trend is unmistakable

    … Some early births are scheduled for the convenience of the mother or doctor …

    … One mother, Michelle Van Norman, gave birth to her second child … 11 days early in 2006, with no need for urgency … Van Norman, a 31-year old mom living in Las Vegas, said her doctor didn’t seem worried about the date.

    “There were no medical reasons for the delivery being early,” Van Norman said. “He told me the week he could do it and asked me to choose which day was best for us.”

    None of those days was best for the baby. After his birth by C-section, one of Christian’s lungs collapsed. He spent three weeks in intensive care and 10 days on a ventilator with six tubes going into his chest.

    “The whole experience was horrific,” Van Norman said. “It didn’t end with the birth, it continued for the first year of his life, and we still don’t know if the oxygen deprivation has had any affect on him.” When Van Norman’s surgeon cut the cord, Christian seemed robust. The doctor declined to comment about the case.

    “The doctor came in the day after and asked where the baby was,” Van Norman said. “When I told him, he asked me if I was joking. “… I swore from that day on I would never put another baby through that kind of torture for any reason.”

    In California, the state Department of Public Health, March of Dimes and California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative have released what its authors call “the Toolkit.” The authors note that deliveries at 37 and 38 weeks account for about 17.5 percent of total births in the United States

    Babies born early through induction or C-section without a medical reason are nearly twice as likely to spend time in the neonatal intensive care unit … They also are more likely to contract infections and need breathing machines …

    “We are finding out that the last weeks of pregnancy really do count” …

    “At 35 weeks, the brain is only two-thirds of what it will weigh at 40 weeks.” Many organizations are responding with programs designed to eliminate early elective deliveries …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Childbirth deaths from spinal anesthesia rising

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The number of U.S. women who die from anesthesia complications during childbirth has fallen sharply in recent decades. But deaths specifically related to so-called regional anesthesia, which includes epidurals and spinal blocks, have crept upward since the mid-1990s …

    … such deaths remain rare. But … the results point to an area where anesthesia can be made safer for women.

    … Regional anesthesia is considered quite safe. But in rare cases, patients can have a severe allergic reaction to the anesthetic, or the drug can cause breathing or heart problems.

    … researchers found that between 1979 and 2002, childbirth deaths related to any anesthesia complication dropped by 59 percent among U.S. women.

    There were three such deaths for every million live births between 1979 and 1990, compared with just over one death per million births between 1991 and 2002 …

    However, while deaths related to general anesthesia kept falling in the 1990s, those related to regional anesthesia rose slightly, from 2.5 deaths for every million C-sections between 1991 and 1996 to 3.8 per million between 1997 and 2002.

    “I think the main thing is to get good prenatal care, and keep any medical conditions you have under control during pregnancy,” …

    What about helping women to prepare and plan for a drug-free birth? This seems like the most logical step. In Australia, almost 50% women have an epidural in labour. If this figure was around 5% (for labour, not caesareans), this would make an enormous difference.

    … Most of the women who died – 48 of the 56 — had undergone a C-section. In the rest of the cases, the type of delivery was not reported.

    Deaths related to general anesthesia during C-section declined markedly over the decade. From 1991 to 1996, there were 17 such deaths per one million C-sections; that rate fell to 6.5 per million for the years 1997 to 2002.

    In contrast, deaths related to regional anesthesia during C-section inched up.

    The reasons for the increase are not known … the overall drop in anesthesia-related deaths since the 1970s is likely related to factors like safer drugs, better monitoring of women’s heart rates, blood pressure and oxygen while under anesthesia, and an improved understanding of how individuals can react to anesthesia.

    But … the medical profession may have become too narrowly focused on preventing deaths related to general anesthesia, which typically is more risky.

    Research in the 1970s and 80s … showed that pregnant women were 17 times more likely to die from general anesthesia than regional. And people reacted to that.

    “A good part of our energy was tunnel-visioned toward general anesthesia,” … “Maybe we’ve let the pendulum swing a bit in the other direction.”

    It is hard to study the potential reasons for the increase in deaths linked to regional anesthesia, precisely because they are so rare …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 44

    Obstetrical anesthesia: new data on the risks

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Virtually all Los Angeles hospitals offer epidural anesthesia to patients in labor. It allows a remarkable degree of comfort from labor pains …; unfortunately, it is not without risk. In many cases, anesthesia is optional; however, it is a necessity for a cesarean delivery. A new study … reviewed 12 years of obstetrical anesthesia-related deaths … The authors reported 86 deaths that were associated with complications of anesthesia; these deaths represented 1.6% of total pregnancy-related deaths. Pregnancy-related mortality ratios for deaths related to anesthesia was 1.2 per million live births for 1991–2002, which was a decrease of 59% from 1979–1990. Deaths mostly occurred among younger women; however, the percentage of deaths among women aged 35–39 years of age increased significantly. The delivery method could not be determined in 14% of the cases; however, the remaining 86% were in women undergoing a cesarean delivery. Case-fatality rates for general anesthesia were 16.8 per million in 1991–1996 and 6.5 per million in 1997–2002; for regional (epidural or spinal) anesthesia, they were 2.5 per million in 1991–1996 and 3.8 per million in 1997–2002.

    Overall, the leading causes of anesthesia-related pregnancy deaths for 1991–2002 were: intubation, … failure or induction (starting general anesthesia) problems (23%); respiratory failure (20%), and high spinal or epidural block (16%) … The causes varied by the type of obstetric anesthesia administered. About two-thirds of deaths associated with general anesthesia were caused by intubation failure or induction problems; however, for women whose deaths were associated with regional anesthesia during cesarean delivery, (26%) were caused by high spinal or epidural block, followed by respiratory failure (19%), and drug reaction.

    The authors concluded:

    * Anesthetic-related maternal mortality decreased nearly 60% when data from 1979–1990 were compared with data from 1991–2002.
    * Although case-fatality rates for general anesthesia are decreasing, rates for regional anesthesia are rising.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Fetal ultrasound safe when used prudently

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Ultrasound images during pregnancy have helped erase much of the guesswork that formerly challenged those of us who practiced obstetrics. As time has passed, the images have become much sharper and more sophisticated. However, there is still much that is not known about the long term risks of exposure of the unborn to ultrasound.

    Fetal ultrasound uses sound waves to make pictures of the fetus and placenta inside the uterus. Since its introduction in the late 1950s, ultrasonography has become increasingly useful. Current real-time scanners depict a continuous picture of the moving fetus on a monitor screen. Very high frequency sound waves … are generally used for this purpose.

    … Some small studies have suggested possible ill-effects of fetal ultrasound. These problems have included low birth weight, speech and hearing problems, brain damage, and non-right-handedness. However, these problems have not been confirmed or substantiated in larger studies from Europe.

    There are some people who suggest that ultrasound use in pregnancy contributes to the increase in autism diagnosed in recent years. The complexity of some of the studies and concerns have made the observations difficult to interpret.

    … the greatest risk arising from the use of ultrasound is the possible over- and under-diagnosis brought about by inadequately trained or under-experienced technicians, especially if working in relative isolation and/or using poor equipment.

    Ultrasound scans should best be performed when there is a clear indication to do so. When that is the case, it is safe to use prudently.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    ‘We know the reality of childbirth’

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A new report on NHS maternity care has revealed divisions between midwives and obstetricians. One of the disputes … is over the best way to give birth. While midwives, and the government, advocate natural birth, many female obstetricians opt for a caesarean when they have their own children. Do they know something we don’t?

    … Sher, 38, chose an elective caesarean … because she decided it was the safest method … Sher makes decisions on delivery and surgery every day, and she understands the consequences more than most – she is a consultant obstetrician.

    One London study … reported that 31% of female obstetricians would personally prefer a caesarean birth. In the US, the figure is almost 50%. Many female surgeons and GPs quietly take this option too – though, as one told me, “to admit as much is still massively un-PC”.

    In April 2007, the then health secretary, Patricia Hewitt, launched her strategy for the future of maternity care. Maternity Matters trumpeted “choice”, promising better access to “normal” deliveries via home births and midwife units. Her plans chimed with recent guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice) drawn up to reduce caesareans – currently 23% of all births – by advising obstetricians against granting them without medical justification. The official disapproval of elective C-sections means Sher daren’t talk under her real name; Stephanie Sher is a pseudonym.

    So while the government promotes “normal” deliveries to the public, its employees are privately planning caesareans. Why do so many obstetricians opt not to push? What do they know that we don’t?

    It’s important to remember that it is the obstetrician’s and the surgeon’s task to remedy the rarer complications and consequences of childbirth. Unlike midwives, who oversee successful, normal births every day, doctors bear witness to the worst-case scenarios.

    Inevitably this difference in experience manifests itself in an ongoing debate on how best to manage childbirth. Midwife groups advocate normal delivery and “natural” births while obstetricians tend to see medical intervention as a benefit rather than a bane. Yesterday, the healthcare commission published a report highlighting several key problems in Britain’s maternity services, one of which was an inherent tension between midwives and doctors on maternity wards. Caught up in the middle are the mothers.

    Maternity experts across the board believe that a straightforward vaginal delivery is by far the best for both mother and baby. Most women agree: 63% of mothers see childbirth as a natural experience that should not be interfered with unless necessary. In “putting women at the centre of maternity provision”, the government’s strategy reflects the overwhelming consensus.

    Nevertheless, among all the furore that surrounds the issue of childbirth, for Sher and her colleagues, one thing is clear: the government’s promotion of delivery “choice” is a promise rarely kept. “There is nothing wrong with hoping for a natural event,” Sher says, “and for everything to happen beautifully. But it just isn’t like that for a large proportion of women.”

    Sher’s greatest fear was not the pain of spontaneous labour. It was the prospect of emergency intervention, if the birth went wrong. According to the most recent NHS maternity statistics made available (2005-6), just under half (47%) of expectant mothers have a regular, uncomplicated “normal” labour. The rest have interventions ranging from induction, to forceps, to an emergency caesarean. In other words, when a woman tries for a normal birth and the best, safest kind of delivery, she has only a 50% chance of achieving it. For a significant number of others, the birth will be more complex.

    I wonder if those women had access to one-to-one midwifery care for their pregnancy, birth and postnatal care? When women are put through a system that sees women having a different midwife at every antenatal visit, shifts of midwives in delivery suite and then shifts of midwives in postnatal, it’s no wonder that most women do not experience a natural birth. bur when women are cared for by the same midwife right from the first visit to 6 weeks postnatal, the outcomes are very different. The ability to develop trust, rapport and understanding are paramount to experiencing natural birth.

    With odds like this, it is not illogical to consider alternatives, particularly not if your line of work exposes you to the most extreme of cases. Many obstetricians find the second safest solution is a planned caesarean. The National Caesarean Section Audit (2001) revealed half of obstetricians think this is the safest delivery method for the baby – though not for the mother.

    The surgical risks of a planned caesarean include haemorrhage, thrombosis and infection. Scarring on the uterus means the more caesareans you have, the more risky later pregnancies become. But Sher knew she only wanted two children and made the choice that suited her best – both were delivered by C-section. The baby’s safety was her primary motive – but not, she adds, the only one. “The other issue was the risk of pelvic floor damage. Again small, but to me, just not worth it.”

    … Michelle Thornton, a colorectal surgeon, sees around 100 women a year suffering from faecal incontinence. “I’m seeing the end result of a traumatic birth,” she says. “Very few of my colleagues would opt for a vaginal delivery and, if any of them asked me, then it’s an elective C-section.”

    What about planning for a natural vaginal birth and preparing well for an intact perineum and a short second stage? Private midwives are expert at working with women to achieve these aims. Most women who birth with private midwives do not need stitches and experience a healthy return to normal pelvic floor function.

    … Not all experts agree that the risks of a surgical birth outweigh the benefit of protecting the pelvic floor. But calibrating clinical percentages is different from witnessing the lives of women with faecal incontinence, says Thornton. “It’s definitely altered the way I think about childbirth. The thought of being faecally incontinent – to have a life like my patients – I don’t think I’m strong enough.”

    … Thornton has half a dozen women in their early 30s. They have “bonding issues with their babies . . . as well as young partners expecting to resume a normal sexual relationship. Two of the couples have split up because of the traumas.” She counsels patients both psychologically and physically. “Emotionally it is tough,” she says. “Having those patients with you when they get upset is tough.” When treatments fail, “it’s terrible, because the patient is absolutely gutted”. Her patients know a permanent colostomy is the only solution. Imparting this news always makes Thornton anxious. “It’s a terrible feeling. It’s like giving them a cancer diagnosis.”

    When it comes to medical matters, we assume that knowledge is a good thing. Looking at the childbirth choices made by some female doctors, we might think their superior professional experience makes them right. But many admit their exposure to complications inevitably taints their personal choices. Is it really better to know what they know? Perhaps it’s not that most women don’t know enough – but that female doctors, and particularly obstetricians, know too much.

    … If you’ve seen deliveries, she says, “you know the reality.” And “maybe that’s why doctors go and have caesareans – they know it is quite a risky time”.

    Interesting, as many midwives opt for homebirths when they have their babies.

    Consultant obstetrician Virginia Beckett also puts it plainly: “When I was 14 weeks pregnant I dealt with 12 stillbirths in one 24-hour shift. You can imagine that might skew your view of how to manage your labour.” (Beckett has had two caesareans, the first because her baby was breach, the second was elective). On that particular shift, her baby was too small for her to feel any movement. Emotionally drained and anxious, she scanned herself in the middle of the night. She needed to know her own baby was still alive.

    Beckett has worked in obstetrics for more than 16 years, but dealing with stillbirths “doesn’t get any easier”. As the obstetrician, you “go in with the machine and with the patient’s eyes boring in to the side of your head, make the diagnosis and break the news”.

    Every time it happens Beckett finds it “heartbreaking, sometimes I do cry actually, not in front of the patient. You feel terrible . . . But there’s nothing you can do.” In the middle of a busy shift there is no time to reflect. “You can’t spend half an hour coming down from every case,” Beckett says, “because there will be another one along in a minute.”

    Complications include “abruptions, where the placenta separates and mum and baby can bleed to death. We see people having seizures with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. We see people’s uteruses rupturing when they’ve had a caesarean section in the past. We see acute fetal distress. We see very complicated vaginal deliveries using instruments, at which various degrees of injury can be sustained . . . All life is here as they say.”

    It is the obstetrician’s job to control the less palatable, natural, consequences of childbirth. And they are very good at it. The UK is one of the safest places in the world to have a baby. And of the 1,917 babies born each day in this country, just 11 will be stillborn. “We know that when we work effectively we’re able to make a difference and that’s why we keep doing the job. When it goes to plan, you feel very positive.”

    And when things go badly? “You feel absolutely awful: drained and disempowered, really.” Choosing a caesarean, admits Beckett, is one way of redressing this because “you realise how out of control things can be sometimes” and ultimately, “how fragile life is”.

    The medics making this choice are unlikely to find support among their colleagues in the midwife unit or even, in some cases, their employers. Current Nice guidelines discourage obstetricians from offering C-sections on “maternal request”. Instead, natural births top the government’s maternity “menu”, with home births promised alongside other “normal” delivery options by 2009.

    Privately, however, many obstetricians believe women should be able to choose a caesarean, if they are aware of the risks. Consultant obstetrician Sara Paterson-Brown has publicly asserted a woman’s right to an informed choice because “mothers must live with the consequences”. Her hospital has not since suffered a stampede of women eager for the surgeon’s knife. “Women are counselled and fully informed and recommendations are made,” she says. “We don’t feel threatened by women expressing their choice.”

    Paterson-Brown won’t tell me how her own children were delivered, but resolutely feels “the best way to have a baby is normally with no complications. The trouble is, you don’t know if that’s going to be you or not.”

    The vast majority of women want a vaginal birth. Just 3% of women even ask for a caesarean without medical indication. Almost 25% will end up having one anyway – largely in emergency circumstances – and a substantial number find their “normal” delivery will go seriously off plan. “There is a lot of luck involved,” says Beckett, “and sometimes the luck isn’t there for you.” Doctors know this, lay women don’t; and when things go wrong, they blame themselves.

    Luck? Is it “luck” if we get a uni degree? Is it “luck” if we pull off a dinner party? Is it luck if we get through a very busy week with everything achieved as planned? Or, is it good planning, good information, good support and confidence in our abilities? There is so much a woman can do to achieve a positive, natural birth: she can inform herself, plan for a great birth, increase confidence and engage supportive care providers. Without this, intervention is the most likely result because that is the world we live in today: a world that is fear-ridden and that seeks to control that which we do not fully understand. I believe that most pregnancy and childbirth “complications” are mediated emotionally and mentally. When women are supported, informed, confident, prepared and cared for by a care provider who supports natural birth, she is most likely to birth her baby naturally.

    Dr Abigail Fry remembers one birth as a medical student which turned from “calm” to “completely crazy” when a cautious doctor intervened. It became a difficult forceps delivery. Afterwards she remembers “the registrar doing the woman’s stitches and saying: ‘Do you think this bit, you know, should go there?’ And I was like ‘I don’t know!’ It was a mess.” Unlike her obstetric colleagues, Fry chose a home birth.

    … “I really enjoyed it.” …

    A recent study also found a huge polarity between pregnant women’s expectations of birth and the reality. Expectant mothers need not be frightened by rare, unlikely risks, but they should be given realistic information about the pain and unpredictability of childbirth.

    How is that not frightening women? “It’s going to hurt like nothing else … it’ll be excruciating. Oh, and by the way, birth is also unpredictable so don’t have any expectations because they’ll be shattered”. How about, “The sensations of birth can be managed in many ways such as with water, hot packs, movement, position changes (etc). Birth can be unpredictable and so it might be helpful to spend some time going through some of the more likely issues that can come up and to look at how they might be managed at the time.” The latter is far more empowering and less fear-provoking than the former.

    Instead there exists a misguided, competitive birth culture; where “lucky” or natural “birthers” are praised for their success, while mothers who “succumb” to medical intervention openly admit they’ve “failed”. Elective caesarean births are so low on the league table they can barely be mentioned without fear of acrimony.

    “Women need education,” says Linda Cardozo, a professor in urogynaecology, who blames the “brand of doing it naturally” for this competitive approach as well as the trend for the “madness” of home births. “Most are perfectly safe,” Cardozo admits, “but if something does go wrong you’re in the wrong place to deal with it.” Childbirth is a natural process, but she thinks we’ve forgotten it’s also “a natural process for far more mothers to be damaged and far more babies to die, and medical intervention is absolutely wonderful because it’s prevented that”.

    But this does not make Cardozo an advocate of elective caesareans. She remembers colleagues choosing them 20 years ago, but personally felt differently. “You see bad experiences in all deliveries, not just vaginal,” she says, besides which, “I truly don’t believe the risk is worthwhile.

    Caesarean section is an operation and all operations carry a complication rate.” So Cardozo did what most women in the UK do, and delivered her three children vaginally, in hospital. Two were twins, one delivered by forceps. “And I’m not incontinent – yet,” she says …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    AMA boss denies bar on midwives

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    THE head of Australia’s peak doctors’ group has rejected claims obstetricians are obstructing midwives’ attempts to see their own patients, saying the first agreement permitting this has just been signed …

    Andrew Pesce, an obstetrician and president of the Australian Medical Association, said he signed the agreement with a Sydney midwife last week, and had all but sealed a deal covering a group of midwives.

    … Dr Pesce conceded some obstetricians were unhappy with the changes, but added the new system could work well with fewer specialists around the country who were willing to participate. Under the changes, introduced on November 1, eligible midwives were allowed to see patients privately under Medicare, provided specific conditions were met.

    I am proud to be that “Sydney midwife” who has an agreement with a private obstetrician to provide care to women. I believe we are the first private midwife / private obstetrician practitioners in Australia to have successfully negotiated a collaborative agreement. Our model ensures that women have care that is suited to their needs, covering everything from waterbirth to caesarean with no need for a transfer between models of care. Each woman has her care with her chosen midwife (complete with Medicare funding) and also has a known and trusted obstetrician available if her pregnancy or birth take a different path. Our model builds on Australia’s excellent record of safety in pregnancy and birth and provides continuity of care with the private midwife and obstetrician of the woman’s choice.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    High cost of giving birth straining public system

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    It is almost a year since the Federal Government set limits on the amount women can claim for private prenatal care.

    Obstetricians say the changes have pushed 25,000 women into giving birth at public hospitals and that is putting an extra burden on an already overloaded system.

    The professional association representing obstetricians and gynaecologists claims 80 per cent of women who are pregnant or trying to have a baby are now struggling to afford specialist care.

    In January the Government capped the amount women could claim for private obstetrics and IVF at between $400 and $500.

    Dr Andrew Foote, an executive member of the National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (NASOG), says the changes have left women seeking specialist care thousands of dollars out of pocket.

    … “The average out-of-pocket [expense] is about $2,000 and the rebate used to be 80 per cent and it has now plummeted.”

    … the costs have forced many people into the public system.

    “… the trends so far indicate about a 10 per cent drift from private to public, which if you look at the numbers Australia-wide, it is an extra 25,000 births per year that are going to arrive in the public system,” …

    Tamara Fuller … opted to go to a private obstetrician because of difficulties conceiving.

    “I’ve had three miscarriages now and I just felt that I needed the continuity of care of an obstetrician who knew my history,” she said.

    “Going private has certainly been difficult… sort of financially because you’ve got the outlay of the $1,850 pregnancy management payments.

    “But then every time I go to the obstetrician, and it is about 10 visits throughout your whole pregnancy, it is basically $65 out of pocket.”

    … But the Health Minister says the changes to the rebate amount for obstetrics have been designed to support the long-term sustainability of the extended Medicare safety net.

    In a statement to The World Today, Nicola Roxon says patients will only pay out-of-pocket obstetrics costs if their doctors are charging excessive fees.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Obstetricians are ready to quit

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    ALMOST a third of obstetricians are considering quitting private practice due to changes to the Medicare safety net, which slash the amount patients can claim for pregnancy services.

    … Most said they have had a drop in private bookings since the changes to the rebate and the majority said the fall had been between 10 and 40 per cent.

    … Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon moved to cap Medicare safety net payments for women who use private obstetricians after the specialists were accused of raising fees to take advantage of the scheme …

    … 49 per cent of 740 patients said they would use the public health system.

    Obstetricians are losing business but what is really happening is an incentive for women to use primary care in pregnancy: a private midwife. Private midwives who have Medicare provider numbers are required to work collaboratively with obstetricians, hence assuring that there will always be a mechanism to provide for obstetric care for women who need these high-level services. The future of private maternity care sees women accessing midwifery care for the most part, and private obstetricians when needed, on referral from the midwife.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Medicare … at last!

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Many Sydney families may now benefit from legislative changes that enable women to claim medicare benefits for private midwifery care for homebirth or hospital birth. Melissa Maimann is thrilled to be one of the first 10 midwives nationally to receive a Medicare provider number.

    A Medicare-Eligible Midwife meets certain advanced requirements in relation to experience, formal peer review, continuing professional development and competence to provide pregnancy, birth and postnatal care to women and babies. This provides an assurance to the public that services provided by a medicare-eligible midwife are of a high standard. In addition, in order to use the medicare provider number, the midwife must have a collaborative arrangement with a doctor to ensure a) continuity and b) a high level of care.

    I am pleased to also let you know that I can now order all routine tests and ultrasounds. This saves women from having to have these attended by their GP. Medicare funding means that cost is no longer a barrier to women benefiting from private midwifery care. It is well known that when women are cared for by the same midwife throughout pregnancy, birth and postnatal, they are healthier, experience less intervention, are more likely to successfully breastfeed and are more satisfied with their birthing experience.

    Melissa Maimann has negotiated a collaborative agreement with a private obstetrician enabling “Ultimate Continuity”: complete continuity of private midwifery and private obstetric care for pregnancy, birth and postnatal. Alternatively, women may obtain a referral to Melissa Maimann for private midwifery care. This referral would be from a GP Obstetrician (ie, a GP with a Diploma in Obstetrics). Please contact me if you are experiencing difficulty in obtaining a referral from your GP Obstetrician.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Maternity doctors fear ‘business as usual’ at Canberra Hospital

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Junior doctors fear it will be ”business as usual” at the Canberra Hospital maternity unit now the inquiry into bullying and harassment allegations has been completed …

    ACT Health announced on Friday afternoon that an investigation into the allegations had been completed but the results would not be made public because of the provisions of the Public Interest Disclosure Act.

    … a number of staff in the obstetrics and gynaecology unit were concerned that the problems which led to the inquiry could occur again.

    ”I think the junior doctors who put their hands up and said they felt bullied now feel hopeless,” Dr Foote said. ”A number of staff have contacted me and said there’s fear and dread of what’s going to happen … it’s business as usual.”

    The inquiry and a separate investigation into service delivery and clinical outcomes were called after it was revealed in February that nine doctors had quit in 13 months …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Study Examines Complication Rates For Pregnancies After Age 44

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Women who become pregnant at age 45 or older have an elevated risk of several complications to their own health and that of their infants …

    The older women were more likely to have health conditions during their pregnancies, with 17% experiencing gestational diabetes … Nine percent of the older group had high blood pressure while pregnant, compared with less than 3% of younger women. Older women had caesarean-section births at more than twice the overall rate and experienced placenta previa — a condition in which the placenta blocks the birth canal — at six times the overall rate.

    Women who delivered at age 45 or older also had higher rates of early deliveries, more instances of fever and severe bleeding, longer hospital stays, and more trips to the intensive care unit when compared with younger mothers. In terms of the infants’ health, 4% of newborns born to older women had metabolic problems, such as low blood sugar, compared with less than 2% of those born to younger women …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Unnecessary C-Sections on the Rise

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Australia’s caesarean rate was 31.1% in 2008.

    Link

    Five years ago, Jill Arnold got some unwanted news at her obstetrician’s office. At 37 weeks pregnant, Arnold was told her baby was too big for her body to deliver naturally. Flipping open a calendar, the obstetrician asked when Arnold would like to schedule a cesarean section.

    Fact: You cannot know that a baby is “too big” until you give labour a go.

    Unconvinced she needed the surgery — the doctor “couldn’t provide any statistics or data” her baby was too large — Arnold delivered her 10-pound, 3-ounce (4.6 kilogram) baby the old-fashioned way. Since then, the now 36-year old … delivered another baby weighing 11 pounds, and now pens a blog called The Unnecesarean.

    Women like Arnold, however, are becoming increasingly rare. Between 1996 and 2007, the number of C-sections performed in U.S. hospitals rose by more than 50 percent to an all-time high: Almost one in three pregnant women …

    “The most concerning problem is the high rate in first-time mothers,” …

    … The shift is toward a more streamlined labor and delivery, and profoundly affects mothers-to-be.

    … this shift is not likely to reverse any time soon.

    In 2009, 26-year old Ann Carter … labored for 14 hours. With her cervix dilated to only 6 centimeters … her doctor told her it was time for a C-section.

    “I was devastated and scared,” Carter said, “I knew it was a possibility but I was hoping it wouldn’t happen.”

    During the surgery, the doctor discovered the umbilical cord had wrapped around the baby’s neck, which explained why Carter’s labor had stalled. The C-section saved the baby boy’s life.

    Um, actually, it is very common for the cord to be around the baby’s neck, and it rarely causes concerns.

    “Most times the decision to perform a C-section is based on the physician’s judgment,” Zhang said, “but there are great variations in decision-making among physicians.”

    … there are “few clear-cut indications” of when to do one.

    … For example, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) lists “failure to progress” during labor, as an indication that cesarean delivery is needed … When things slow down, there is an element of judgment involved where a physician determines whether to continue to wait, induce or perform a C-section … it can take hours to determine whether or not labor is progressing.

    In Zhang’s study, however, he found that many patients weren’t given a sufficiently long time period to allow their labor to progress. In other words, doctors were calling it quits on waiting and opting for a C-section too soon — often before the patient’s cervix was dilated to 6 centimeters.

    This was especially true in cases of induced labor … Almost half of the C-sections in these women occurred before they were 6 centimeters dilated …

    Still, it is not clear whether inducing labor raises the risk of C-section, or whether other factors are involved that contribute to why women were induced in the first place …

    … Another factor contributing to the record-high cesarean rates is a drastic decline in vaginal births after cesarean … 70 percent of women in his study who had previously undergone a cesarean delivery had C-sections with their subsequent pregnancies, without attempting vaginal delivery.

    One reason for this is a fear of lawsuits. If a physician doesn’t perform a C-section, and something goes wrong with a patient who previously had a C-section, the law often does not protect the physician …

    … the number of malpractice claims involving obstetric and gynecologic surgery are the second highest of all medical specialties. In 2009, the claims totaled over $133 million.

    Fears of legal action also explain why at least 30 percent of all U.S. hospitals have official bans prohibiting VBACs …

    The risks associated with a vaginal birth following a C-section have been somewhat exaggerated, however, Zhang said.

    “Women and physicians may be concerned about uterine rupture, but the risk is less than 1 percent,” …

    To help reduce rising cesarean rates, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced less restrictive guidelines in July, stating that vaginal birth “has fewer complications than a repeat cesarean….restrictive VBAC policies should not be used to force women to undergo a repeat cesarean delivery against her will.” …

    … some medical experts have suggested the rapid rise of C-sections in the last decade is also due in small part to mothers-to-be requesting them, not doctors. Still, data on “patient choice cesareans” is lacking, as statistics used as support of their frequency are often based on ambiguous procedural codes used on hospital discharge records.

    In any case, women who opt for a C-section may not be getting adequate information about risks, and may fear they have no other option …

    … To curb the rise, many advocate giving women more autonomy over their labor and delivery, and combining the strengths of modern medicine with the principles and practices of midwifery.

    La Follette’s California office is an example of this more comprehensive approach: After participating in a larger practice for 12 years, she now works with two experienced midwives and another physician. Her practice has a successful VBAC rate of 75 percent.

    “We take into account the expectations and ideas of the mom and balance that with medical guidance,” La Follette said.

    As more women consider practices with midwives and home births — which can be dangerous if complications arise — much of the medical establishment has been digging in its heels. In 2008, the American Medical Association’s House of Delegates proposed a resolution to declare hospitals the only safe place for labor, and only midwives who work under the supervision of physicians as safe.

    The Midwives Alliance of North America declared the resolution “seriously out-of-step with the ethical concept of patient autonomy in healthcare [that] distracts from other critical issues in maternity care.”

    If there is any chance of lowering the rates of C-sections, professional organizations will need to review all the available evidence, Zhang said.

    But any change won’t be easy. On the one hand, doctors need to include expectant moms in their own care; on the other, it sometimes seems that doctors who are worried about potential legal consequences can’t focus on a patient’s best interests.

    “We’re fighting a cultural issue,” Scott said, that extends beyond C-sections.

    She said, “We need to change the entire way we view birth and we have to be able to trust our caregivers. The alternative would be terrifying.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Your body, your choice

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The transforming experience of childbirth is increasingly blotted by medical interventions. Are women making informed decisions?

    LIKE most first-time mothers, Faye Wong … was incredibly excited when she got pregnant. She read baby books and magazines voraciously, signed up for ante-natal class … to prepare for baby’s arrival.

    When she was 38 weeks pregnant, her obstetrician said the baby’s head had engaged and his size was quite big. The doctor suggested inducing her labour.

    In the labour room, her “nightmare” began. The pain from the drug-induced contractions was a rude jolt to her system. Then she was jabbed and prodded with painkillers, IV tubes and the works.

    “I was shocked, confused, and in absolute terror,” recalls Wong, 35. Finally, the induction failed and she had to be wheeled in for emergency caesarean. Thankfully, she delivered a healthy baby boy weighing 3.9kg. When she got home, she struggled with breastfeeding and suffered a severe bout of post-natal blues.

    “I felt ‘cheated’ … ” Wong admits. Her son is now seven. “I was a newbie to the birthing process and was meek as a lamb led to the slaughter,” she adds. “If I’d known then what I know now, I probably would have been better prepared, stood my ground and not undergone early inducement.”
    Though doctors play a role in giving women the necessary information about labour options, women and their partners need to take their share of responsibility too in making informed choices and decisions.

    Wong’s experience isn’t unique.

    “We see a fair amount of women who are unhappy about the outcome of their deliveries,” says Jennifer Hor of Jenlia Maternal Services. The UK-trained midwife has been running ante-natal classes and post-natal home visits for 17 years. “Some felt they had a C-section even though they didn’t want it. Or, some felt they didn’t get enough information from their doctors.”

    So, are women less assertive when it comes to childbirth? Are they getting or finding the information necessary to make informed choices and decisions? And have we forgotten that childbirth, an age-old practice, is meant to be natural?

    Birth trends

    … the medicalisation of childbirth means what used to be a straightforward, natural process is now treated as a high-tech medical procedure.

    Caesarean rates are on the rise in both developed and developing countries …

    … “Women say they want to take ownership of their bodies, yet we have healthy, low-risk women who said they had a C-section for their first births because they listened to their doctors,” says Farouk, who also sub-specialises in reproductive medicine. And because of the risks from the first surgery, these women are requesting for repeat C-sections. “Ironically, women are pushing the trends that way.

    “We are also seeing the use of more technology to manage pregnant mothers, for example using CTG (cardiotocography) … and ultrasound scans,” says Farouk. “It’s not all bad, but if you monitor too much, you might pick up something and wonder if you don’t take action, there might be consequences, hence the interventions.”

    … Doctors come with their beliefs and agendas, based on experiences. Some underplay certain risks and amplify others. For instance, placental calcification … is not a major issue for some obstetricians if the woman is near term and foetal growth is normal. But for a different doctor, a few specks on the ultrasound scan is reason enough for labour induction.

    “There can be grey areas in medical investigations. I tend to be more conservative with placental calcification and continue to monitor foetal health and growth parameters,” …

    Also, fear of litigation is scaring obstetricians into defensive and often interventionist practices.

    “An obstetrician is more likely to be subjected to litigation because a caesarean section was not performed or was perceived to have been performed too late …”

    Medical interventions

    Clearly, it’s not always true that C-sections or epidural blocks are being foisted on reluctant women. The fact is, some women don’t question their doctors, or they themselves are asking for interventions.

    Labour induction, elective caesarean, epidural jabs, and routine episiotomy are some of the common medical interventions during childbirth.

    Induction of labour … is usually done when the mother’s or baby’s health is at risk …

    “For such cases, studies have shown that caesarean section rate has been unchanged or lower among the induced group as compared with expectant management of pregnancy … ”

    “But induction of labour at 37 to 41 weeks on non-medical grounds is linked with an increased risk of caesarean section for … a woman who has never given birth and an increased risk of instrumental delivery,” …

    No doubt, medical interventions can be a lifesaver for mothers and babies …

    However, once the natural process of labour and birth has been disturbed, if there is no actual emergency, there is risk that the side effects of the treatment will trigger more intervention necessary to fix the problem. This sequence of events is called the “cascade of interventions”.

    “Pitocin (Syntocinon), a synthetic form of the hormone oxytocin used to induce or speed up labour, often results in a rapid increase in the intensity and strength of the woman’s contractions. As a result, she may opt to use pain medications such as pethidine … or epidural anaesthetic. Babies sometimes don’t react favourably to the sudden increase in the intensity of the contractions, which may result in irregularities of the heartbeat. Thus in turn may necessitate delivery by caesarean,” …

    “Many women who use epidural do not experience the urges to bear down which help them to birth their babies. Often, in this situation, the doctor will use forceps or vacuum to deliver the baby, which means he needs to do an episiotomy … Many women experience long-term perineal pain following episiotomy.”

    A failed induction (when labour doesn’t started after the first cycle of treatment) can either require a rescheduled induction or emergency C-section.

    “Women should received accurate information about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of induced labour and understand the possible side effects and interventions, ” …

    The big ‘C’

    Most women also come with the preconceived idea that C-sections are safer than vaginal delivery …

    … “In fact, C-section, which is classed as a major surgical procedure, carries with it the risk of complications and shouldn’t be viewed as an alternative option to normal birth.”

    … “Babies delivered by elective caesarean section at 37 to 39 weeks’ of pregnancy are at two to four times more likely to suffer from respiratory morbidity compared with babies delivered by vaginal delivery,” … WHO global maternal survey also finds that women who choose elective caesarean with no medical indication are at increased risk of maternal death and serious complications.

    … Studies have linked depression and distress after birth, which affect up to one in five women, to forceps and caesarean births …

    Disturbed birth

    “You must be mad to give birth without an epidural!” A common reaction these days if you speak with women who have undergone labour. But as the WHO states, “epidural analgesia is one of the most striking examples of the medicalisation of normal birth, transforming a physiological event into a medical procedure.”

    … in her book,Gentle birth, gentle mothering, internationally acclaimed birth expert Dr Sarah J. Buckley explains how epidurals or painkilling drugs and synthetic hormones (used during induction) interfere with some of the major hormones of labour and birth. The five major hormones: oxytocin (hormones of love); beta-endorphin (pleasure and transcendence); the catecholamines or CAs, epinephrine and norepinephrine (excitement); and prolactin (tender mothering) form a “cocktail of hormones that nature prescribes to aid birthing mothers of all mammalian species”.

    During an undisturbed labour, these hormones rise in crescendo and peak around the time of birth or soon after for mother and baby, and subside over the following hours and days. “An optimal hormonal orchestration provides ease, pleasure, and safety during this time for mother and baby.” Interference with this process, by injecting drugs or synthetic hormones, will “disrupt the hormonal orchestration, making birth more difficult and painful, and potentially less safe”.

    For example, epidurals lower the mother’s production of oxytocin or stop its normal rise during labour. Oxytocin causes a woman’s uterus to contract in labour. It peaks at birth and catalyses for the final powerful contractions of labour, and helps mother and baby to fall in love at first meeting.

    Under stressful conditions, our body releases epinephrine and norepinephrine (CAs). Towards the end of an undisturbed labour, the mother experiences an adrenaline rush – the natural surge in these hormones gives her the energy to push her baby out, makes her excited and fully alert at first meeting with her baby.

    But when a woman feels fearful or unsafe, her labour is inhibited by high CA levels. Epidurals reduce the release of the CAs, which may be helpful if the high levels are restricting her labour. However, a reduction in the final CA surge may make it difficult for the woman to push her baby out, thus increasing the risk of instrumental delivery (forceps and vacuum).

    Epidural’s side effects include nausea, slowing of labour and drop in blood pressure, slowing of contractions, and headache.

    35-year-old Laila Aziz of Kuala Lumpur was wheelchair-bound for four months after an epidural jab injured her nerves when she delivered her third child.

    “I wish my O&G and the anaesthetist had explained in details the pros and cons of using an epidural,” says Laila, who suffered severe post-natal blues after childbirth. “I would at least reconsider whether to use the option at that time.”

    … Childbirth educator and lactation consultant Christine Choong has been advocating natural childbirth for the past two decades.

    “My main passion is how birthing practices affect breastfeeding. What happens when you’re in labour can have a long-term effect on your breastfeeding,” …

    Research has shown that when you put a baby on his mother’s chest (skin-to-skin contact) immediately after he was born, the baby will crawl instinctively towards her breast.

    “Quite often the baby won’t do that if you had used drugs during labour … because he will be drowsy the first two to three days,” … “If women use epidural, very often their babies are delivered by suction or forceps which can cause discomfort on baby’s head (a shock to the system) and baby initially will not be happy feeding on one side or the other.”

    Whether a labour induction is done on medical grounds or not, the baby is – by definition – relatively immature and likely to have impaired ability to effectively coordinate sucking, swallowing, and breathing at breast …

    “In a C-section delivery, very rarely the mother is given the baby straight away,” Christine adds. “Early stimulation or suckling is important to establish breastfeeding. Also a higher percentage of caesarean babies end up with respiratory problems, which results in separation of mom and baby.”

    But we need to look at the whole picture – the impact on baby, feeding, and mother-baby relationship.

    “It isn’t just feeding but also nurturing,” says Christine, a mother of three.

    “When babies are nurtured and their needs are met, in the long term, they will become people who are secure, confident, and know how to form relationships with people.”

    Take control

    What do you do if your care provider says you or your baby is at risk and an intervention is necessary?

    “Using evidence-based information, your doctor should explain the reason for any suggested interventions. He should also explain the benefits and risks of such procedures,” advises Choong. If you’re not sure or not too convinced by your doctor’s explanation, get a second opinion.”

    “Empowerment with the correct knowledge and information is useful so women can ask the correct questions,” Chow adds. “And their fear of childbirth should be addressed by getting support and learning about the labour process and pain relief options.”

    Ultimately, a woman’s satisfaction with her birth experience is related more to her involvement in decision-making than to the outcome, as Buckley emphasises. Though doctors play a role in giving women the necessary information, women and their partners need to take their share of responsibility too in making informed choices and decisions.

    When Wong had her second child, she was more mentally and emotionally prepared.

    “Although I ended up having another C-section (due to hypertension), I didn’t feel disappointed and helpless,” Wong says. “I felt as if I was a real mom this time around.”

    As Buckley sums it up best, “birth is the beginning of life; the beginning of mothering and of fathering. We all deserve a good beginning.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Instruments Can Assist Birth, But With Risks To Mother, Child

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Forceps might be a better instrument than a vacuum cup for assisting a successful birth, but new mothers might experience more trauma and complications after a forceps delivery …

    If the choice of instrument is the vacuum device – also known as a ventouse – metal cups are more successful than soft cups in delivering a baby …

    This procedure comes with its own risks, however: Newborns are more liable to have scalp lacerations with the metal cup than the soft cup vacuum …

    “In general, these results show tradeoffs between the different instruments, with both advantages and disadvantages in most comparisons,” … “What is important is to be aware of the specific advantages and disadvantages of each instrument.”

    Forceps and vacuum-assisted births are relatively rare in the United States … less than one percent of births involved forceps, and less than 4 percent involved vacuum assistance.

    The decline in forceps use might be due in part to a lack of training … “… [forceps] [are] substantially more effective at executing delivery,” …

    In forceps-assisted births, the Cochrane reviewers found, women were more apt to suffer vaginal tears and trauma and experience some kind of incontinence after the birth than those who had vacuum-assisted births. They were also more likely to need general anesthesia, and to undergo a Caesarean section.

    “This may be because forceps were more often used following a failed vacuum birth,” O’Mahony said, “whereas the vacuum was less often used following failed forceps.”

    Although vacuum cups appeared to be less risky for the mother’s health, they come with their own set of concerns, the researchers said.

    “The risk of scalp injury with the metal vacuum cup is a particular cause for concern,” …

    … some expectant mothers might not want to consider an instrument-assisted birth, but … they should know that these instruments could help them avoid a Caesarean section, which carries its own risks. Her approach, she said, is to discuss all the options with a woman before birth, “so we can negotiate between the risks to get everyone to be safe and have a healthy mom and healthy baby.”

    My experience has been that forceps are more likely than a vacuum to result in a vaginal birth. Often times, if the vacuum is unsuccessful, the woman is advised to have a caesarean. In this instance, forceps might have been a better option. Forceps can be used after an unsuccessful attempt at a vacuum birth, however this does increase the risk of trauma to mother and baby.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Childbirth ‘over medicalised’

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    WA’s top child health researcher has stirred up the childbirth debate, claiming it is over-medicalised and saying she does not believe there is evidence that homebirth is riskier than a hospital delivery, provided it is a low-risk pregnancy.

    Telethon Institute of Child Health Research director Fiona Stanley said she was strongly supportive of the use of midwives and that too many women were having caesareans, which could lead to complications for the mother and baby.

    Professor Stanley said her own grandchildren had been delivered by midwives without medical intervention, and obstetricians needed to relinquish low-risk deliveries to midwives and trust there would be good outcomes.

    Her comments came as pregnant women cared for by experienced midwives won the right to claim Medicare rebates from this week, as part of the Federal Government’s health workforce reforms.

    “I’m strongly supportive of the increasing role that midwives are playing by preparing women for birth, by helping them plan for a spontaneous, normal delivery that will be better for mother and child,” Professor Stanley said.

    “We published a study about a few years ago which showed a dramatic increase in caesareans, and that the majority of the increase was unrelated to medical risk, so it was either obstetricians wanting to deliver that way or it was the mothers demanding it.”

    Professor Stanley said there were anecdotal claims that homebirth was dangerous but she had not seen the evidence.

    “If people say homebirth is dangerous, show us the data, because the data we have shows they’re not if the right things are in place,” she said.

    Retired Perth obstetrician Ralph Hickling, who has just published a book, Childbirth today: too many caesars, not enough joy?”, echoed the call for wider use of midwives.

    Dr Hickling said the management of childbirth had been taken over by consumerism and there was a push towards an almost 100 per cent caesarean rate.

    “In recent times Australia could claim having the highest caesarean rate in the world and I think WA could claim the highest in the country, and there’s no way the obstetric discipline can justify a caesarean rate of 35 per cent or more,” he said. “Pregnancy is being treated as a disease and childbirth is seen as an operation to cure the disease.”

    Community Midwifery WA manager Pip Brennan said that under the program women with low-risk pregnancies were reviewed by an obstetrician and monitored by midwives during their pregnancy and labour.

    “Typically women have very positive experiences,” she said … “I was in labour for quite a while but it was a wonderful experience being in my own home,” she said. “Soon after the birth I was having a cooked breakfast in bed and it was so relaxed.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Forceps babies ‘more likely to behave badly’ while those born by Caesareans ‘are calmer’

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Babies born with the help of forceps or a suction cup are more likely to have emotional problems …

    … assisted delivery techniques produce high levels of stress hormones that may affect development.

    … children born after a caesarean requested by their mother have fewer emotional and behavioural problems. In pre-school, they were found to be much less likely to suffer from anxiety, aggression and attention disorders.

    … babies born with the aid of forceps were more likely to be aggressive as young children, but Caesarean babies were calmer

    … Immediately after birth, umbilical cord blood cortisol levels have been found to be lowest in babies born by elective caesarean, followed by spontaneous birth. The highest levels are found in assisted deliveries where forceps or a suction cup is used because labour is prolonged and complications may have developed.

    Previous studies have suggested these children experienced the highest levels of stress at birth.

    … ‘Cortisol levels have been linked to childhood psychopathology, however, more studies are still needed to look at this in more detail,’ …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Baby death rate higher in ‘low-risk’ pregnancies

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Babies born to women in the Netherlands who are considered as having low risk pregnancies and are cared for by a midwife are twice as likely to die as babies born to high-risk women who are looked after by an obstetrician …

    … the findings are ‘unexpected’ and that pregnancy care in the Netherlands ‘needs further evaluation’.

    The Dutch childbirth system is based on deciding if a woman is high or low-risk. Low- risk women are looked after by midwives, high-risk pregnancies are supervised by obstetricians.

    … The death rate among the nearly 38,000 births studied was 2.6 per 1,000. For low-risk women the perinatal death rate was ‘significantly higher’ than for high-risk women, the report said. And the death rate for women who were referred to a specialist during labour was even higher, the report said.

    This shows ‘the Dutch system of risk selection in relation to perinatal death at term is not as effective as was once thought,’ the researchers said.

    The researchers told the Volkskrant that putting all women under the care of an obstetrician is not the answer. One option would be to develop maternity wards and birthing centres where both high and low-risk women gave birth, with obstetricians and midwives on hand.

    Delays

    ‘At the moment, if something goes wrong under the supervision of a midwife, it takes longer to get specialist attention,’ researcher Anneke Kwee told the paper.

    Although around 40% of Dutch women plan to give birth at home, only around 22% actually do so.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    A Woman’s Ethnicity And Genetics Can Impact Labor Progression And Pain

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … a clinical study … suggeststhat a women’s labor experience is tied to her ethnicity as well as genetics.

    The study found differences in the receptor that controls uterine muscle contractions … which predicted later transition to active labor. This genetic difference is common in Asian women and may account for findings that Asian women transition to active labor later. Black women had slower early stage labor, which could last over 36 hours. Heavy women also had much slower early labor. Epidurals were generally associated with a 30 percent longer labor time.

    “We do not believe that the epidural actually slows the labor, but rather patients who are having a slower, difficult labor ask for an epidural earlier,” …

    Despite coutless studies showing that routine epidurals and elective epidurals result in longer labours, more augmentation, a higher caesarean rate and a higher rate of forceps and vacuums, some obstetricians still refuse to accept this, citing other causes for these outcomes!

    … the study identified the mother’s sensitivity to cold was correlated with increased labor pain … [this] might be due to differences in a receptor on the uterine muscle that detected both cold and pain … women who require instrumental (such as forceps) vaginal delivery start off with more pain possibly because the baby’s head is not in the most common position …

    Might be true if this was the case for women who have chosen private midwifery care and other continuity of midwifery care models. However, women who choose private midwifery care rarely have assisted births or epidurals. In contrast, rates of assisted births and epidurals are highest amongst women who book with a private obstetrician. These differences in intervention rates have been well-studied and are indisputable. The care of low-risk women by obstetricians results in more interventions more often, compared to when low-risk women are cared for by midwives with referral to an obstetrician if needed.

    “We hope that the models that we created will allow women and their doctors to predict how fast or painful labor will occur so that they can make more informed choices about delivery,” said Dr. Reitman.

    To what end? To increase the caesarean rate by providing women with hard data that their labour will be long and painful, therefore not to bother trying?? What is the world coming to, where women are encouraged to accept interventions based on the possibility of a long labour? I’m sure the data will not be used to encourage homebirth to a) the women who may have a fast / painless labour and also b) the women who are forecast to have a long / painful labour (being at home feels more comfortable and safer to some women, therefore assisting labour progress).

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448