Private Midwifery in Sydney Rotating Header Image

VBAC

The Unkindest Cut: Countdown to a C-Section

Link

… “Usually I start off by telling people my C-section started even before I got to the hospital …

… Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns had the highest rate of cesarean section deliveries in San Diego County in 2009. The California average was 29.8 per 100 births; at Sharp Mary Birch, the rate was 37.7.

… At 40 weeks … Cooper-Schultz’s water broke, though she was not in labor. In a birthing class … they told her, we have to get the baby out within 24 hours. So she and her husband went to the hospital right away.

“They pretty much wanted to put me on Pitocin the minute I walked in the door because I wasn’t having regular contractions,” …

… women believe their C-section deliveries at Mary Birch were the result of convenience for the doctors, fear of litigation, and/or lack of staff training in nonmedicated childbirth options.

… It is common for hospitals to use Pitocin if a woman has not gone into active labor within 24 hours after her water has broken to avoid the risk of infection. But the staff at Mary Birch wanted to give Cooper-Schultz Pitocin within the first two hours.

Cooper-Schultz refused the Pitocin at first. She wanted to get things going naturally … At the 12-hour mark, her cervix had dilated to four centimeters. She says she now understands that this “is a good natural labor progression for a first-time mom.”

But it wasn’t fast enough for the staff at Mary Birch. Cooper-Schultz … allowed them to give her the Pitocin that she says they’d been pushing since she’d arrived.

… “They weren’t honest with me. They didn’t say, ‘If you get the Pitocin, you’re probably going to need an epidural.’”

… Cooper-Schultz withstood the pain of Pitocin contractions for eight hours before she finally gave in and got an epidural … The epidural worked on only her left half.

At one point, the doctor came in to check on her and alerted the nurses that she was going home to take her kids to school. Sometime later, she returned with wet hair, checked Cooper-Schultz, found her at nine centimeters, and told her to try pushing.

“I pushed, and [the baby’s] heart rate went down … she said she’s worried about it. She said, ‘He’s not in distress, but he’s a little bit stressed.’”

The doctor told Cooper-Schultz it would go one of three ways. In the first scenario, Cooper-Schultz would push for 20 or so minutes and the baby would come out. In the second, she could push for 20 or so minutes, the baby would not come out, and they’d have to do an emergency cesarean section. Or, the doctor said, they could do a cesarean section right now.

Cooper-Schultz chose the cesarean. …
∗ ∗ ∗

Helen … welcomes me into her North Park apartment shortly after the dinner hour on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. She tells me she’s an unlikely candidate for natural childbirth.

“I’m like Woody Allen,” she says. “I am a New Yorker who likes living in the city, who likes creature comforts. And for somebody like me to be embracing [natural childbirth] is humongous.”

… Dover’s story is similar to Cooper-Schultz’s in that it begins with a desire to give birth naturally … and ends in what she considers an unnecessary C-section. One difference is that when Dover started out, she did know she might have to fight for what she wanted … She stayed home and labored for 10 to 12 hours before she went to the hospital, avoiding “the clock” for as long as she could.

When she arrived, armed with her research and her hopes for a natural birth, she found that the environment at Mary Birch had a greater impact on her than she’d imagined it would.

… The progression she’d experienced at home, from two centimeters to four, slowed drastically when she arrived at the hospital. A doctor told her that it might help if he broke her water. So she allowed it. But nothing happened …

… Dover lists her regrets: Not waiting and laboring longer at home. Allowing the Pitocin at 12 hours. Giving in to the epidural after 8 more hours. But the regrets go as far back as her pregnancy, when she chose to stay with Sharp.

“I should’ve just switched … “In order for me to switch to Scripps and go to one of the birth rooms at Scripps, which has a much better record, would have meant changing everything: changing my primary care physician, changing my OBG. I would’ve had to totally change my insurance policy. And at the time, I already had a pediatrician picked out for her and everything. We’d interviewed, and just the idea of doing all of that was overwhelming. I thought I didn’t have the strength to do it.”

… “[The doctor] said, ‘You need a C-section,’” she says. “I said, ‘I don’t understand why I need a C-section. Everything seems to be fine. Her heart rate’s not dropping.’ And he said, ‘Well, she’s stuck.’”

“… I was totally against using the suction, but anything besides the total hands-off. He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt your baby, and you don’t want to hurt your baby.’ I started crying. And I just finally said, ‘Fine. Cut me open.’” …

∗ ∗ ∗

The obstetrician a woman chooses plays as large a role in her birth experience as the place she chooses to deliver her baby. Some doctors have a reputation for being more inclined to help with a natural birth, and others for being less inclined …

Thompson cites the “bait and switch,” where a doctor claims to support a woman’s birth choices up until the final weeks, when it’s too late to change doctors. Messer says she’s seen doctors who’ve initially said they’d support the hypnobirthing process but later changed their minds.

“All of a sudden it’s, ‘That’s not going to work. No, you can’t be on your hands and knees. That’s not safe, and this isn’t,’” Messer says. “And that’s at 40 weeks. So now, where can I switch?”

… Christine Stewart, a petite redhead and mother of twin girls born at Mary Birch in September 2009, says she experienced something similar with her doctor.

… “… we took a Bradley Method childbirth class,” Stewart says, “which is a 12-week class, pretty in-depth, and we decided we wanted to do natural, unmedicated labor.”

When she first mentioned this to her doctor, Stewart says the doctor told her to “keep an open mind” and not to “fixate on any particular way of labor and delivery.” At the time, Stewart thought the doctor didn’t want her to be disappointed if natural birth didn’t work out, but now she speculates that the doctor was always leaning toward a C-section.

At 36 weeks, the doctor suggested they induce her at 38 weeks. Stewart refused.

“From what I can tell,” she says, “it’s just common that it’s more manageable to have twins at 38 weeks because of size. Sometimes they’re concerned about size. But [my girls] were normal-sized.”

The doctor suggested 39 weeks, then 40. Finally, Stewart agreed to induce at 41 weeks if she hadn’t gone into labor by then. But it was unnecessary. At 40 weeks, three days short of her original due date, Stewart went into labor.

Stewart chose Mary Birch because it had everything she was looking for. Originally, she’d wanted to deliver at Best Start Birth Center in Hillcrest, but they don’t accept women who are pregnant with twins. Mary Birch, she says, seemed like the next best thing.

“It had the facilities, doctors on hand, and all these different classes — prenatal yoga — and since I was diagnosed high-risk because I had the twins and since I was over 35,” she says, “I just thought their whole entire focus is for women and newborns, so I’ll probably get the best care because they’ve got all the resources for that.”

Stewart had heard about other women going into the hospital prematurely and getting “strapped down” immediately. But in her natural childbirth class she’d learned that mobility helps with labor. So she and her husband didn’t go in right away.

Once they did arrive at the hospital, Stewart was four centimeters dilated. She gave the nursing staff her birth plan, which stated that she did not want any mention of pain medication.

“Thankfully, they did not offer medication. They were respectful of that … I was slowly dilating in a normal time frame. They were telling me that was normal …

… Christine Stewart believes that the main reason she ended up having a C-section was that her nurses had no training in natural childbirth.

“Ultimately, the outcome was because there was no one in the labor room who had the experience to help get the babies in position to be delivered,” she says.

By the time the doctor arrived, Stewart was fully dilated. She knew her babies were healthy, that they were both head down, in a good position, face forward. Her blood pressure was not elevated, she had no fever, and she’d been in labor for less than 24 hours. Everything was normal except that the babies were wedged in, each trying to get out first.

… At 2:00 a.m., the doctor came in and said, “It’s time to meet your girls.”

… I kind of resigned myself, like, ‘If this is what we have to do, this is what we have to do.’ I felt like crying because it just went against everything I had hoped for, everything I had planned and practiced for.”

“I think the hospital has some standard protocols, and I think that if you don’t follow their standard protocols, they just don’t know what to do with you,” she says. “And a C-section is manageable. They know exactly how to do it, and I think at 2:30 in the morning it’s, ‘We can manage this, and then we can all go home.’”

∗ ∗ ∗

Last March, when her first son was two and a half years old, Elizabeth Cooper-Schultz had her second child in the back bedroom of her UTC apartment, in the company of her husband, her midwife, two apprentice midwives, and a doula.

Today, Helen Dover is pregnant again. When I ask if she plans to give birth at Mary Birch, she and Henry simultaneously answer, “No.”

“What I’ve learned is that at Mary Birch, everybody’s going to try to get you to do the birth that they want you to do,” Dover explains.

For their next baby, the Dovers will stay with Sharp in order to take advantage of the tests, which would cost them thousands of dollars out-of-pocket. They will also register at Mary Birch so that they are prepared in the event of an emergency. But they have hired a midwife to help them birth at home.

“We’re going just to get what doctors are good for,” Henry says, “and then to use the midwives for what they’re good for.”….

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Inducing labor doesn’t raise risk of uterine rupture in VBAC

Link

Inducing labor doesn’t increase the risk of uterine rupture, once length of labor is taken into account, in women attempting vaginal delivery after a cesarean delivery …

… After accounting for length of labor using a time-to-event analysis, researchers found that the risk of uterine rupture with induced labor was similar to that of spontaneous labor … Women with an initial unfavorable cervical exam (<4 cm dilation) had a higher risk of uterine rupture with induced labor than spontaneous labor ... and those with cervical dilation <2 cm and 2 cm-3.9 cm on the initial exam were at greatest risk.

Women who undergo induced labor may spend more time in active labor than those with spontaneous labor ...

Interesting research, as common understanding has it that induction is never a wise choice in a VBAC, and many women who need an induction who have previously had a caesarean are advised to undergo a repeat caesarean. If induction can be safely carried out, this would help to reduce our high caesarean rates.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Unneeded cesareans are risky and expensive

Link

Cesarean deliveries are over-used … and reducing the number of surgical births would save health-care dollars and protect women’s health. Those are the conclusions of a new white paper issued today by the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative.

… in the last 15 years, the rate of surgical birth has increased from 22 to 32 percent of California deliveries with no measurable benefits for new mothers or their babies.

This is a concern because cesareans aren’t risk-free. After surgical delivery, women experience more pain, infection and hemorrhage than women who give birth vaginally. Women who have had a prior cesarean also have more problems with subsequent pregnancies. The placenta can become deeply implanted in scar tissue from the old incision, causing hemorrhage at the second delivery …

The white paper, which was funded by the California HealthCare Foundation, uncovered striking evidence for over-use of cesarean: Among low-risk women having their first baby, the rate of the surgery varies from nine percent to 51 percent of births based on the mother’s geographic location within California. As a press release about the paper says:

This large variation among California regions and hospitals cannot be explained by medical factors alone and therefore suggests that labor management practices and local attitudes help drive the use of cesareans during labor.

Reasons for the increase also include: physicians’ concerns about medical liability and avoidance of risk, as well as specific labor practices such as the increased reliance on labor induction, early labor admission, lack of patience in labor, and the virtual disappearance of vaginal birth after a prior cesarean …

“Over the last 15 years, cesarean deliveries have become so common that in some hospitals and communities they are considered ‘normal births’ despite the increased risks,” …

The white paper makes several recommendations for how to reduce unnecessary cesareans, including removing perverse financial incentives … encouraging VBACs … improving public education about the risks of cesarean delivery, and implementing statewide quality-improvement activities for better labor practices.

Unfortunately, there is no mention of the role of the midwife in preventing the first caesarean, or in helping a VBAC woman have a successful VBAC.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Rates of C-sections and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder on the rise

Link

The birth of Helen Dunn’s first son didn’t go nearly as smoothly as she had envisioned. Induced two weeks early because of concerns about the baby’s health, the Vancouver clinical counsellor endured 17 hours of painful contractions before her baby went into distress … She had an emergency caesarean section, the whole experience proving to be a traumatic one with terrible, lasting effects.

“I immediately felt disconnected from him when they showed him to me,” … “I didn’t recognize him. I wasn’t attached to him; in fact, I had an aversion to him. I wanted them to take him away, which is hard to admit. After that it was very difficult for me, it was a long process of panic attacks, which I’ve never experienced before, and full-blown agoraphobia.

“I didn’t want to tell people how I felt; I felt a tremendous amount of shame about how I felt toward my child, the difficulty I was having bonding with him,” she adds. “I was diagnosed with postpartum depression, but I had no idea about postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder.”

Looking back now, she can see that those panic attacks were among the condition’s telltale signs … PTSD after childbirth is characterized by two key elements: experiencing or witnessing an event involving actual or threatened danger to oneself or others and a response of intense fear, helplessness, or horror. Symptoms include obsessive thoughts about the birth; feelings of numbness, detachment, or panic; disturbing memories of the birth experience; nightmares; flashbacks; and sadness, fearfulness, anxiety, or irritability.

… the reported prevalence of postpartum PTSD ranges from 1.5 percent to 6 percent …

Dunn was even more struck by the effects of her traumatic birth following the delivery of her second son six years later. She laboured for 17 hours again, but this time delivered vaginally with the assistance of a midwife in hospital and went home soon after.

“I didn’t have any problems,” Dunn says. “He immediately looked familiar to me — he looked like my sister — I felt bonded to him, attached to him.” The stark differences between her two childbirth experiences prompted her to explore other women’s feelings of attachment to their newborns among those who delivered via emergency C-section as well as vaginally in her Master’s thesis. Now she wants to raise awareness among health professionals and the public alike of two pressing issues: postpartum PTSD—in particular signs, early intervention, and effects on maternal-infant attachment—and the high rates of C-sections in this country.

Although C-sections clearly play a vital role in maternal health and can be life-saving, about 26 percent of deliveries in Canada take place this way, which is nearly double the rate recommended by the World Health Organization.

Then there is the way postpartum PTSD is so widely misunderstood and overlooked, in Dunn’s view.

“When I did reach out for help, people would say, ‘You’ve got a healthy baby; what do you have to complain about?’ or ‘This was so long ago; why is it still bothering you?’

… “When someone says, ‘I don’t want to see my child… I really wish someone would have said to me at that point, ‘Can we help you?’ When I told a nurse I was feeling strange, having panic attacks, she said it was because of the medication. Even one gesture of support or kindness from somebody on the front lines can go a long way to help a woman gain a sense of control of what’s happening to her. I think it could have been handled a lot better in my case. I think I would have benefitted from more support had there been more knowledge around it.”

Maternal-health expert Michael Klein … says that … women who have emergency C-sections without adequate support or communication from their caregivers suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder far more frequently than those who don’t.

“What we know about the psychological experiences of women is that women who have a sudden, unexpected, emergency caesarean section without any chance to really adapt to it are the most likely to suffer psychological distress,” … “Posttraumatic stress disorder is much, much, much neglected.”

… Klein emphasizes that the primary determinant of whether a woman will suffer PTSD after child birth is not the mode of delivery. Rather, it’s how she’s cared for. In other words, the condition can occur in women who have vaginal births, deliveries that require forceps, midwife-assisted labours, and in other situations. The crucial factor throughout is how her care team responds to her needs.

Other factors come into play as well, such as prior psychological and psychiatric disorders and the woman’s prepregnancy mental state.

… “We know that women never forget their childbirth experiences,” … “They can be transformative in a positive way or transformative in a negative way. Talk to any 50- or 60-year old woman and she can tell you every minute of their childbirth experience.” …

Continuity of care – that is, being cared for by one person who is trusted and liked throughout the pregnancy, birth and postnatal period – is vital for minimising the chance of PTSD. Continuity models include private obstetric care, where a woman has all of her pregnancy care with one obstetrician and that same obstetrician is on-call for her birth. Continuity models also include private midwifery care where a woman has the same midwife for all of her pregnancy, birth and postnatal care. Obstetric care can be accessed through eligible midwives who have collaborative arrangements with obstetricians.

Visit my website to learn more about my services.

Foley Catheter is as Good as Gel for Inducing Labour

Link

New research as found that the use of a Foley catheter appears to be as effective as prostaglandin gel, but with fewer side effects. These were the findings of a randomised trial. The Foley catheter is used to inflate a balloon behind the cervix that simulates the pressure of a baby’s head to make the cervix dilate, likely by stimulating endogenous prostaglandins.

Caesarean section rates were similar in both groups, however more caesareans were performed for failure to progress in the foley catheter group, than the prostaglandin group. +Operative delivery due to fetal distress was less common with the Foley catheter than with prostaglandins.

The Foley catheter group was also more likely to be augmented with Syntocinon, though this was common in both groups and is a general feature of induction.

Why is this research important?
Women who have had a previous caesarean but require induction are often forced into a corner because many care providers are reluctant to induce labour on women who have had a previous caesarean for fear of the scar separating. This often leads to a reluctant decision to have an elective repeat caesarean. However, if women have the option of a foley’s catheter induction, this provides a safer alternative to prostaglandin induction with fewer complications.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

Turbulent times

A lot has been happening in the world of homebirth and midwifery. Many will have read the articles about homebirth, freebirth, midwives and maternity care that are appearing in our papers on a daily basis.

I have not posted for a couple of weeks now, for three main reasons: one I have been really busy with my practice which has not been this busy for about two years. Second, I attended the Australian College of Midwives National Conference – the ACM worked really hard to deliver an excellent conference that was appreciated by all. I had the fantastic opportunity to meet midwives from around Australia and share ideas, discuss practice and talk birthy things. I was pleased that the conference was in Sydney, because as those of you who know me will know, in my non-midwifery life I rescue and care for injured and orphaned native birds, and so I was able to make a trip home most days of the conference to feed everyone at home. They were hungry but they all survived! I digress. The third reason for not posting was that the recent issues have made me re-assess things like responsibility, accountability, safety, choice, control, autonomy, beneficence, informed decision-making and many other issues. I have no answers to report. Just lots of reflection.

Midwifery and maternity care are going through turbulent times and as professionals and organisations, I feel that we have done a major disservice to women that they feel safer birthing at home – with or without a registered midwife – in the presence of risk factors – because they so strongly believe that the hospital system will not enable them to birth in the manner of their choosing. It is a sad reflection on the health system and the professionals who work within it. Women who cannot access midwifery care because they are planning a VBAC. Women who are told that if they insist on birthing vaginally with twins, they must accept continuous monitoring, induction, epidural and birth in stirrups for twin two. Women whose only option is to birth in a hospital that is two hours from their home. We have all heard the stories.

My biggest disappointment is the lack of midwife admitting rights. We are one year into the maternity reforms on November 1 this year. We have eligible midwives with Medicare provider numbers, ordering tests and working with doctors to provide safe care to women and babies – yet we cannot access hospitals to provide this care. I well understand that there are a lot of hurdles to be overcome with midwife admitting rights, and life has taught me that nothing in life is impossible.

The release of the homebirth position statement – which I fully support as an evidence-based and safe way to provide care – combined with the lack of midwife admitting rights, is disastrous for women and midwives. Higher risk women are forced into a position of birthing in hospital without their midwife if the midwife complies with the position statement but has no admitting rights – otr else freebirthing, potentially with disastrous consequences. Overnight, this change occurred and women are fuming.

It is impossible to believe, but an eligible midwife who crosses all the “T”s and dots all the “I”s will suffer incredibly in terms of restriction of clientele, however if she were to remove her name from the register – something that I understand is very easy to do – she may do just as she pleases with no accountability, regulation or practice standards. Midwives are placed in the untenable situation of a dwindling practice, or unregistering and having a flourishing practice. Until admitting rights are in place, midwives will have no place to birth with their higher-risk clients. This situation does not see the Government supporting midwives or women. It is creating a disaster.

The various politics of homebirth and midwifery has created an enormous rift between midwives. It seems that there are the bunch who have elected to become eligible, forge ahead with collaborative arrangements, push for admitting rights and accept the increased regulation that is upon us as our profession matures. The other group opposes the increased regulation and restriction of choice, supports midwife- (or non-midwife)-attended homebirth for any woman who wants it and really wants things to just go back to how they used to be, before insurance became mandatory. Many midwives sit comfortable in the middle of this debate. It is sad to watch such division and animosity amongst midwives. We seem to lack a capacity of saying, “We don’t share each other’s vision and we have made different choices, but we are midwives and we will support each other”. As one midwife said to me, “We are each doing the best we can for the women we care for and we’re making the best of a rotten situation”.

I know 2012 will be better than 2011. Who knows? Maybe it’ll be an historic year where for the very first time, women will birth on their own terms, with their chosen midwife, at home or in hospital. I wonder how many women will insist on homebirth in spite of significant risks, if they are able to birth in hospital with their own midwife and in the manner of their choosing.

Visit my website to explore birthing services.

I’m pregnant. Who should I go to for care? A Midwife or an Obstetrician?

Private Midwife:

  • Provides autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care for women who are experiencing normal, healthy pregnancies
  • Provides care in consultation with an obstetrician when a woman’s pregnancy has risk factors (eg high blood pressure, prem labour, concern for baby’s growth, gestational diabetes etc)
  • Transfers responsibility for care to an obstetrician if complications emerge and continues to provide care within the midwifery scope of practice
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Private Obstetrician:

  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Receives referrals from midwives for women with risk-associated pregnancies or births
  • Always provides labour and birth care (including caesarean) in collaboration with a midwife
  • Obstetric care on average results in a high degree of intervention such as induction, epidural, caesarean and episiotomy
  • Provides brief in-hospital consultations after the baby is born, followed by a 6-week check
  • Pregnancy appointments are generally no more than 15 minutes in duration
  • Collaborative care: private midwife and private obstetrician

  • Receive autonomous pregnancy, birth and postnatal care from one midwife and one obstetrician regardless of risk factors
  • No transfer of care if risk factors emerge
  • Supports women to birth normally with a high rate of natural birth
  • Supports women to breastfeed
  • Provides pregnancy, birth and postnatal care
  • Pregnancy appointments allow time for questions, education and discussion with appointments typically 45-60 minutes in duration
  • Women are highly likely to report satisfaction with their care and experience
  • Provides autonomous care for women regardless of risk factors
  • Supports women to birth naturally, including with twins, a breech baby or a VBAC
  • Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Hospital births continuing through our service

    Given the troubled times for midwives attending hospitals in a birth support role – either for planned hospital birth or in a homebirth transfer situation – I have had many calls from current clients and women who are exploring their birthing options, asking if hospital births are still going ahead through this service. I wanted to provide reassurance that yes, my hospital birth service is continuing! I am continuing to take bookings for hospital birth and I am able to attend hospital births in the full capacity of a midwife.

    Owing to an ongoing collaborative agreement and hospital arrangements, hospital births are continuing. Women book with me early in their pregnancy and have all of their care with me. Women also see an obstetrician twice in their pregnancy. Birthing takes place in a hospital setting complete with waterbirthing. We support VBAC, twin and breech births. It is an all-risk model too, so women don’t need to be “low risk” to benefit from continuity of midwifery and obstetric care. It also means that there is no “transfer” if a woman’s pregnancy becomes high risk: she can still receive the same wonderful care and support from her chosen midwife and obstetrician.

    Hospital staff are not routinely involved in the care of women who book through our service and we have gone to great lengths to create a birth centre feel to the birthing rooms. Rooms are quiet, warm and peaceful and we have a variety of tools available to support natural, active birthing such as floor mats, bath, shower and birth balls and of course many women also choose to bring personal items from home.

    After the baby is born, we support early discharge with many women choosing to go home four hours after the birth. Of course women may stay longer if they wish. I visit daily for the first week, twice in the second week and then weekly until discharge at 6 weeks.

    Should there be any issues along the way, we have ready access to a specialist obstetrician who is known to the woman from pregnancy.

    So the short answer is YES! I am able to continue to attend hospital births and am receiving many calls about the popular model of care.

    Visit my website to explore birthing services.

    Caesarean section? Vaginal birth? Your choice!

    Visit my website to explore homebirth and hospital birth.

    Much has been said and written about an article in The Age this weekend. The article is about a randomised study that will compare the outcomes of 500 women who choose a caesarean and 500 women who choose a vaginal birth. The study will explore psychological and physical outcomes for the women and their babies, including depression and breastfeeding rates. It will only compare vaginal births with caesareans for healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies.

    The study has created much debate, including issues of ethics (beneficence, autonomy, non-maleficence) and professional duty of care. I wonder if part of the “answer” will not be answered by this study, since the study only addresses outcomes from the first pregnancy, but most women do not have one child, they have two, on average. It’s reasonable to assume that a woman who has an elective caesarean for her first baby, will go onto have an elective caesarean for her second baby.

    In the current maternity system in NSW, a woman who chooses a vaginal birth for her first baby has the following outcomes:

  • only 52% women having their first baby will have a normal birth
  • 33% will be induced
  • 23% will have forceps or vacuum
  • 25% will have a caesarean – and of these women, only 12% will have a vaginal birth in their subsequent pregnancy.
  • In other words, only 75% of first time mums who elect to have a vaginal birth will actually have one.

    In contrast, a first time Mum who chooses a vaginal birth with a private midwife has about a 95% chance of having a vaginal birth.

    The real question isn’t the outcomes of a first-time Mum’s pregnancy when she chooses a vaginal birth or a caesarean, but rather, what happens for the average woman who has two children, who has elected a caesarean with her first versus a vaginal birth with her first baby. In other words, how about we compare the outcomes of women who have two caesareans, with women who elect to have a vaginal birth the first time around, 75% of whom will birth vaginally, and 25% of whom will have a caesarean.

    Such a study would address the issue of second caesarean risks. Serious maternal morbidity (eg placenta praevia, placenta accreta, uterine rupture, need for hysterectomy and blood transfusion) increases progressively with increasing number of cesarean sections a woman has. The first caesarean is generally very safe but increasing numbers of caesareans are perhaps not so safe.

    A further issue with the study is that it does not suggest any method or support for the women who elect to birth vaginally. Will they be supported with one-to-one midwifery care, as this is known to increase vaginal birth rates? Will they include homebirthing women who are highly motivated to birth normally and without interventions? Or will it be standard obstetric / hospital-based births with high rates of intervention that are already known to result in reduced breastfeeding rates and a dissatisfaction with the birthing experience? I will wait to read the results.

    Factors affecting vaginal birth after previous cesarean

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    A recent article about factors affecting vaginal birth after previous cesarean has identified some key recommendations for clinical practice as a result of the reviews:

  • Given the potential adverse health risks posed by caesarean sections for both mothers and babies, further work is necessary to lower the rate of repeat caesareans.
  • Hospitals should implement evidence-based local guidelines to increase the uptake and success of VBACs.
  • They should also implement VBAC decisional aids and develop specific clinics in existing antenatal clinics to provide women with clear and consistent, evidence-based information about the choices open to them.
  • Clinicians need to show caution when inducing or augmenting women who have had a previous caesarean section.
  • X-ray pelvimetry and scoring systems to predict VBAC success should not be used exclusively to direct clinical practice.
  • Disappointingly, some other aspects of clinical practice were not reflected in these guidelines. I think that preventing the first caesarean would be the best place to start. I feel this is best done with continuity of carer: that is where a woman is cared for by the same person throughout her pregnancy, birth and new parenting experience. Ideally, a woman will have her own midwife and obstetrician so that she has complete support and confidence.

    Assuming the woman is well supported and goes on to have a caesarean, I find it really helpful to explain to the woman exactly what happened (as best as we know) and why and help her to make sense of her experience. It can be helpful to draw diagrams, use a model doll and pelvis to visually show the position of the baby in the woman’s pelvis, review the notes that were taken through the labour and answer all of her questions. The other really vital thing is to let her know that she can absolutely plan a vaginal birth next time, provided that there are no “absolute contraindications”, ie things like a placenta praevia which make a vaginal birth very unsafe for the mother and baby. These things are rare and for the most part, women who have had a caesarean with their first baby can very safely plan a VBAC with their next pregnancy.

    Now to the next pregnancy … a planned VBAC. It’s important again that the woman has continuity of carer, and preferably this care will be from 1 midwife and 1 obstetrician. It will give the woman reassurance and confidence to know that her care will be from two people who know her and understand her wishes.

    I have found that women who plan a VBAC need lots of time to talk and debrief their last experience. It’s not uncommon for women to feel that their body is broken, that it doesn’t work, that they are incapable of birthing their baby. They may feel a range of emotions: frustration, anger, disappointment, hurt, fear, powerlessness and perhaps distrust. Talking through these emotions goes a long way to paving a clear emotional path for a successful VBAC. I always recommend to my clients that they attend a Calmbirth (R) course and that they read, read and read. The more knowledge a woman has, the more confident she feels and the more relaxed she will feel going into labour – and all of this is really important for a successful VBAC.

    In labour, active birth is emphasised – upright positions, movement and so on. We use a form of monitoring that means women can still labour in the bath or the shower. It doesn’t interfere. Hydration and nutrition are important for maintaining fluid and energy levels. Waterbirth is a great option, but land births are great too. I find most women birth their babies in an all-fours or kneeling position and these positions are best for helping the baby move down through the pelvis. Spontaneous pushing is preferred, where the woman pushes according to her body’s cues – and I find that this reduces the chance of tearing. The baby’s entrance should be smooth and gentle and straight into its Mother’s arms.

    Following a successful VBAC, women often feel triumphant and amazing. In time, sometimes other emotions surface – things like anger (directed at self or others), guilt (perhaps feeling that the last baby didn’t experience the calm birth that the current baby has experienced), regret (if only I had done xyz …) and so on. Sometimes it’s helpful to write these feelings down and talk so someone trusted – a friend or family member for example.

    And as a final note, there is no such thing as a “failed” VBAC. VBAC is not about the destination, it is about the journey. It is about the courage and determination and the innate ability of a woman to make the very best choices that she can make at the time. Sometimes a caesarean is the best way for the baby to be born safely, and we honour the journey and the wise decision making.

    National C-section rate highest ever, study says

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    More than one in three babies in the U.S. is now delivered by cesarean section …

    Thirty-four percent of single-baby births in 2009 were done surgically, the highest percentage ever.

    … “This is a big issue, and this is actually going to come under a lot of scrutiny in the coming year,” …

    … changing physician practices, such as inducing labor and a desire by physicians and patients to schedule convenient times for labor, may be leading to the increase …

    … no data exists to show “that higher rates improve any outcomes, yet the C-section rates continue to rise.”

    “At the end of the day, the C-section rate has risen … over the past decade, and we don’t have any improved baby outcomes to show for it …

    In fact, hemorrhaging from C-sections is one of several possible factors in the state’s increased maternal death rate … The number of women in California who died from pregnancy-related complications rose from 5.6 out of 100,000 live births in 1996 to 14 out of 100,000 in 2008 …

    … “but we do know [caesarean] causes increased morbidity, or complications, so the thought is if you do enough of them, you’re going to see more direct complications.”

    … the main risk comes when women have a second, third or fourth C-section. As the procedure’s use increases, more women will have multiple C-sections, meaning the risks will be increasingly present in the future …

    Expectant mothers need facts, not fear

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Here we go again. A debate about home vs hospital birth.

    There is only one thing … that’s more emotive than where you give birth to a baby, and that is how you feed it.

    This week, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists … proposed that more women give birth away from doctors and hospitals. I really want to see how this works, because if there’s anyone more scared of home births than the parents, it’s doctors and midwives. (Note: not all, I know.)

    I’m not a doctor, nor a midwife. I have slightly more experience of pregnancy and birth than some, by virtue of being co-founder of a parenting website for the past seven years and working as a lay rep in a large maternity hospital for four. But really, my opinion, just like so many birthing women, counts for little.

    Look at what this report says: “The model we are proposing focuses on the needs of the woman and her baby by providing the right care, at the right time, in the right place, provided by the right person and which enhances the woman’s experience.” Sound great, doesn’t it? But who will decide what the right care, at the right time, etc, is? Who listens to what a mother … wants?

    Hospitals are so tied by NHS policy and guidelines, and are so scared of being sued that midwives who once were perfectly capable of delivering breech babies, big babies or twins at home (yes, it can be done) no longer can, or do. So it’s easier to book everyone into the hospital. What will change? How will it change? There aren’t enough midwives as it is.

    When I decided to try for a home birth I had to take myself out of the NHS system (an option that may no longer exist soon because of the threat to our independent midwives, but that is another story, for another time) because the idea so terrified almost everyone I met. I was simply deemed too high-risk. But this wasn’t based on any analysis of my actual, individual risks. It was because I ticked two boxes: “over 40″ (this is still being cited as a reason not to have a home birth) and “previous C-section” (ditto). One of the paediatricians at the hospital where I was a lay rep told me I was being irresponsible, that my scar would tear (the risk of uterine rupture is, in fact, very small) and that I’d kill myself and my baby.

    “Don’t expect us to attend to you” were her actual words. Amazingly, because I wasn’t on a dual suicide/infanticide mission, and I didn’t want to leave my firstborn motherless, I asked two separate, senior midwives to go through my previous notes with a fine-tooth comb. Conclusion: no reason at all not to try for a home birth if you want to …

    For many … the thought of giving birth at home is terrifying. I toyed with the idea of a home birth with my first for about 10 minutes. It was only when I saw firsthand what hospitals could offer and after five years of researching birth that I was brave enough even to think about it for my second baby.

    I’ll cut to the chase. I had my home birth without drugs or incident. Yes, it was fantastic. No, you shouldn’t have to have a home birth if you don’t want to, no more than I should have had to go to hospital if I didn’t want to. This brings me on to something that no report can ever address, and that’s the baggage we all – health professionals included – bring into maternity services: our own experiences. They should inform, but not dictate.

    There is one bit of the report that I think is underplayed: … “Women themselves need the support and encouragement of society, including the professionals, to take responsibility for their own health”. Indeed, we all need to take responsibility for how babies are born. Women need to stop dramatising labour, especially to their daughters. (Maternal influence is huge on a daughter’s subsequent expectation of her own labour.) Health professionals need to stop lecturing a woman on how to give birth and start listening to what women want – and then provide consistent, accurate, non-emotive information to help her set the agenda.

    We all need to stop projecting our own experiences and think that’s how it will/should be for everyone else. Only then can we hope to reverse this collective hysteria that surrounds giving birth. People who make TV programmes and films: I have a special message for you, because how you portray birth is so hugely influential. I know it makes for better TV to have a woman on her back, in a hospital, screaming and tearing off her husband’s earlobes, but please, counterbalance this with women also giving birth quietly, in a position other than prone and sometimes at home. It’s partly because of you that it took me nearly 40 years to realise that it could be done.

    Melissa Maimann & Andrew Pesce: Collaborating for success

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    ALTHOUGH only a handful of collaborative arrangements have been signed between obstetricians and midwives since national maternity reforms were introduced in November, calls for a policy rethink are premature and counterproductive.

    In fact, the reforms provide an exciting opportunity for collaborative maternity care that is safe, locally responsive and woman-centred.

    A variety of private maternity care models are possible and we are confident these will build on Australia’s strong record of safety and quality in maternity care. They will also meet the needs of women who want the familiarity and the comfort of knowing the obstetrician and midwife who will be with them through their pregnancy, birth and new parenting experience …

    Obstetricians may be concerned that the new arrangements mean they will not be directly involved in patient care until something goes wrong, while some midwives fear that the arrangements will be used to control midwifery practice, adversely impact on childbirth choices and promote anticompetitive restriction of trade.

    We believe we are the first private obstetrician-midwife team in Australia to have successfully negotiated a formal collaborative arrangement and we are very happy with how it has progressed since our first discussions.

    The first woman under our joint care gave birth in March this year and we have several others booked through to January 2012.

    We share a similar philosophical approach to maternity care and have agreed practice guidelines that we believe to be safe, evidence-based and woman-centred …

    … Women appreciate the continuity of care, and the assurance that an obstetrician they have met will be involved if medical assistance is required. Feedback from women so far has been outstanding. The main criticism has been that this model of care is not available in other hospitals.

    One of the reasons why there are currently so few collaborative arrangements has been the time taken by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency to endorse eligible midwives and by public maternity units to credential midwives in private practice.

    … Our agreed guidelines are explained to patients before they engage our services and childbirth choices are not restricted. In fact, choices are enhanced as the midwife is able to attend births in the full capacity of a midwife in hospital.

    Importantly, our model of care does not dictate “transfer” of care, merely a shift in the balance of obstetric and midwifery care because we recognise that every pregnant woman needs her own obstetrician and midwife. We support midwife care during waterbirth, vaginal birth after caesarean section, physiological birth positioning and physiological third stage.

    Change is often difficult as we all tend to be creatures of habit. This change brings with it many opportunities for obstetricians and midwives in private practice to work together in ways that are beneficial to both and, importantly, to the women in their care.

    … The maternity reforms will succeed if we remember that midwives and obstetricians are in it for the same reason — to provide safe care that meets the needs of our patients, within a respectful, professional environment.

    Dr Andrew Pesce is an obstetrician practising in Sydney and immediate past president of the AMA. Ms Melissa Maimann is a midwife in private practice based in Sydney.

    Rules on patient safety hit midwives

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Homebirth supporters claim bureaucrats are restricting women’s choice by stopping some midwives from managing higher-risk homebirths, particularly women who have had a caesarean delivery.

    Homebirth Australia said it was aware of more than 20 recent cases … where midwives had been deregistered or had conditions imposed on their registration because of claims they were working outside safe guidelines.

    … The Weekend West is aware of a WA midwife who was ordered last week to stop providing care for planned homebirths in women at higher risk, including those who had a caesarean and wanted to have a normal birth in the next pregnancy.

    The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency wrote to the midwife, saying the condition was imposed by the WA Nursing and Midwifery Board because the midwife had not proved he or she could provide a safe homebirth environment for a planned vaginal birth after a caesarean.

    “The board formed the reasonable belief that because of your alleged conduct issues, you pose a serious risk to persons, and it is necessary to take immediate action to impose conditions on your registration to protect public health or safety,” the letter said.

    … the move could force women to have unattended homebirths, putting them and their babies at risk. “We can’t by stealth deregister or pose conditions on midwives which rob women of access to a registered health professional,” she said.

    Australian Medical Association WA president Dave Mountain … questioned whether the health system should allow higher-risk women to exercise the choice of homebirth when there were clear risks for them and their babies.

    What a huge ethical debate – largely unresolved. All women have the right to autonomy – the right to make choices, have control over what happens to their body, to accept or reject advice and interventions, to decide when, where and by whom they will be cared for, to access care – or not. It is a fundamental human right that is enshrined in law.

    On the other side – the health practitioner has a duty of care to the woman and her unborn baby and is obliged to provide safe care at all times. Safety is defined in terms of what the average midwife would do, or by accepted professional standards, or by laws relating to practice. A health practitioner cannot be incited to practice unsafely: they must make a judgment and adhere to professional standards.

    So where does this leave us all when the two positions collide? Although we have guidelines on what we ought to do in those situations, as we can see from the above article, they do not hold water. The consequence for now is an increase in the number of women opting to freebirth – that is an unassisted homebirth (no midwife present). I am hopeful that in time, the regulatory authorities will support midwives to support all women.

    QLD: Mums-to-be pushed into caesareans with private hospitals leading the way

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    SOME of the state’s biggest private hospitals are performing caesareans on more than half the women giving birth …

    The caesarean rates among the highest in the country were uncovered in hospital birth statistics from 2007-2010 obtained by The Sunday Mail under Right to Information laws.

    Queensland’s “caesars palace” was the North West Brisbane Private Hospital, which performed the surgery on 56.8 per cent of women giving birth. Toowoomba’s St Vincent’s Hospital and The Wesley Hospital in Brisbane rounded out the Top 3, with rates of 54.8 per cent and 51.8 per cent respectively.

    The latest figures … will reignite the turf war between midwives, who espouse natural birth, and obstetricians who defend surgical intervention.

    Caesarean births are recommended as safer options for women having large babies, twins or breech births, as well as older mums and women who have had previous caesareans.

    Latest recommendations from Canada suggest that vaginal birth is safest for most breech babies. NSW Health promotes vaginal birth for twins and of course we know that vaginal birth after a caesarean is safer than elective repeat caesarean provided that the birth takes place in a facility that has resources available to perform an emergency caesarean if needed. And “big” babies? This cannot be known with any accuracy ahead of time and the current recommendation is for a planned vaginal birth.

    But some critics say growing numbers of medical professionals are convincing mothers to undergo caesareans just to streamline private maternity ward schedules and maximise revenue.

    Across the state the figures add weight to the theory, with caesareans accounting for 27.6 per cent of births in public hospitals and a huge 48.3 per cent in private hospitals.

    We know that this difference is not comprised of women requesting caesareans: only 2-3% women actually request a caesarean. Most are told they “need” a caesarean because their baby is “big” (3.3Kg), “late” at 39 weeks and 6 days, a previous caesarean, breech, twins, IVF, mum is “overweight”, mildly elevated blood pressure (130/80) and so on. I have heard all of these and more, as “valid” reasons for caesarean.

    Several new mothers approached by The Sunday Mail last week said they had been pushed into having caesareans by private hospital obstetricians after initially wanting to give birth naturally.

    One Coolum mum, 45, said her obstetrician told her she had “no choice” because the baby would “not fit through my birthing canal”.

    This can not be known ahead of time. The only way to find out is to labour and see how it goes. Dedicated, exclusive, one-to-one midwifery care in labour from a midwife who is know to the woman by name and trusted by the woman, is the most important factor in ensuring a normal birth.

    … “I just wanted a natural birth, to me that was important …

    I think personal responsibility also plays a part here. If a woman genuinely wants a natural birth, she needs to consider which care provider will maximise her chances of achieving this. Consumers of any service are wise to research options thoroughly before they go ahead with them. We do more research about buying a car, house or holiday than we do when choosing our care providers. Having chosen an ill-suited care provider, it is never too late to change.

    Another mum … desperate to avoid a caesarean, said her obstetrician also tried to book an induction because she had passed her due date in the Christmas-New Year period.

    “The obstetrician said we can book you in for an induction because we just don’t like calling people in on public holidays,” …

    But doctors point the finger at today’s “too posh to push” mothers, who they say demand caesars, as well as older mothers who have an added risk with vaginal births.

    Australian College of Midwives spokeswoman Professor Jenny Gamble said the health system was driven by profit.

    “It’s all about less night disturbance and more throughput; it all comes down to money,” she said. “It’s a fee-for-service model the more women obstetricians see, the more they earn.”

    Australian Medical Association Queensland president Dr Gino Pecoraro rejected as “urban myth” claims that obstetricians earned more for caesarean births.

    Private Hospitals Association Queensland said birthing decisions were not made by the hospital.

    This is true: hospitals do not make any decisions about birth: those decisions are made by the doctor and patient. As we have read in this article, many of the decisions are “guided” by the doctor. The other factor in these escalating caesarean rates is litigation. When caesarean rates increase and doctors are reluctant to attend VBACs, the caesarean rate will automatically increase.

    Not all doctors have high caesarean rates and some are very supportive of normal birth BUT … if a woman genuinely wants a normal birth, the best advice is to go a normal birth specialist.

    Amazing websites and great info

    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    I’d like to share some amazing websites and links:

    http://birthrites.org/ Birthrites have a new website. Birthrites is an Australian website dedicated to VBAC.

    http://www.vimeo.com/22765005 A lovely recording of a home birth. Just beautiful. Be sure to watch it to the end. Tissues might be needed!

    http://painfreelabour.blogspot.com/ I love the premise: Pain free labour is an achievable goal for the majority of women with a normal first stage of labour. Women are taught from an early age to fear going into labour. When they do they start secreting adrenalin, this causes changes in the body which cause labour contractions to feel painful. You can reduce adrenalin output by using relaxation techniques in pregnancy and labour. Once you know the truth, you have a chance to choose.

    http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/themes/birthanddeath/childbirth.aspx This looks at (Royal) childbirth from 1533 onwards. Fascinating!

    Pioneering Collaborative Private Maternity Care: Continuity, woman-centered, personalised, safe.

    Our brand new model of care – launched for the first time in Australia – has recently welcomed its third baby. So far, three families have benefited from a collaborative model of private maternity care that enables women to have care with a private midwife (with Medicare funding) and also develop a trusting and nurturing relationship with a Specialist Obstetrician who is available for the pregnancy, labour and birth. Our service has so far supported an empowered birth after caesarean, a waterbirth and a natural birth. All within a hospital setting, with all the support available that is occasionally needed.

    We’ve received some really positive feedback:

    “The collaborative model seemed unique to me. To have a private midwife and our own birth experience but in a hospital with an obstetrician who was known to us as back-up in case of unexpected complications, allowed us to feel totally comfortable and confident for our first baby.”
    “I felt entirely supported and encouraged.”
    “A highly personalised level of care was offered which makes you feel listened to and allows time for lots of questions.”
    “I liked the fact that we got time to develop a relationship and feel comfortable together, allowing us a better birth experience. Postnatally, it was nice to have the same person continuing my care. It was highly personalised.”

    Our model sees women booking with me for their care. Women who are interested in having collaborative maternity care meet with the obstetrician early in their pregnancy and again between 32 and 36 weeks. Women see the obstetrician more often if additional visits with him are needed. Otherwise, I am in frequent communication with him and we work together to provide safe, evidence-based, woman-centered care to our pregnant women. This allows women to build a sense of connection, trust and continuity.

    We support natural birth, active birth, physiological birth positions, physiological third stage, water birth, VBAC, twin births, breech births … and so on. Women are really well prepared for natural birth with an emphasis on informed decision making and woman-centered care. Childbirth education is included, as well as access to a lending library of books and DVDs.

    Birth care is provided initially at home and then we move to hospital where I provide full midwifery care. The birth is attended by myself and the Obstetrician if needed / desired. It’s an intimate, calm, peaceful experience and facilitates a gentle and safe birth.

    After we have welcomed the baby and birthed the placenta, women generally stay in hospital for 4 – 24 hours before returning home. Of course, if there are any issues women are welcome to stay longer, but generally I find that women feel more comfortable in their own homes, in their own beds. I visit at home every day for a week and continue care for 6 weeks. Since women book into hospital as a private patient, they are almost assured a private room with an en-suite.

    I’m really excited about this model of care because it meets the needs of women so perfectly:

  • Women having their first babies, maybe feeling unsure of what to expect
  • Women who previously experienced dis-continuous care from care providers who were unknown to them
  • Women who are planning a natural birth but perhaps with a more challenging pregnancy
  • Women who want a home birth / birth centre birth but with a known obstetrician available if needed
  • Women who really desire a sense of control over their birthing experience
  • This is a new way of working for both midwives and obstetricians and is a really supportive and nurturing way to practice. There is a huge potential for professional growth and learning. The most positive element, however, is the radiant smiles on the faces of the women who have birthed with us and the babies who have received a safe and gentle start to life.

    New guidelines give C-section moms a choice of vaginal delivery

    MEDICARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR MIDWIFERY CARE THROUGH THIS SERVICE!
    Visit my website to explore home birth, hospital birth and Medicare-funded private midwifery care.

    Link

    Recent changes in national guidelines are prompting more women with C-section scars to choose to try to birth subsequent children vaginally, and more providers willing to offer the choice …

    “I think we’ve seen the bottom of the pendulum with the VBAC rate, and it will swing the other way,” said Dr. George Macones, an expert in the safety of a vaginal birth after Caesarean.

    … Despite research that estimates 60 percent to 80 percent of women with prior C-sections would succeed in attempting a vaginal birth, the latest figures show the rate has fallen to just 8 percent from 28 percent in 1996.

    While the conference will cover issues such as caring for a Caesarean scar, legislative advocacy and delivering breech babies, the weekend will focus on educating women and health-care professionals about the latest evidence regarding vaginal births after Caesareans …

    A year ago, the National Institutes of Health gathered evidence from experts in multiple health fields and concluded that labor is a “reasonable option” for women with prior C-sections.

    Shortly after, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists loosened its guidelines stating that attempting a vaginal birth after Caesarean is a ‘safe and appropriate choice” for women, including those carrying twins, with two previous Caesareans, a suspected large baby or gestation beyond 40 weeks.

    Macones … has published more than two dozen studies about the safety. He has reviewed records of almost 25,000 women at multiple hospitals and found that the risk of uterine rupture … is less than 1 percent.

    “VBAC is not as dangerous as it has been painted to be,” … Several other obstetric procedures carry the same, if not higher, complication rates.

    … the “perfect storm” led to the marked decrease in the VBAC rate: physicians’ more aggressive use of medications to induce or speed up labor … , the rising cost of malpractice insurance and patient preference.

    In addition, the obstetrician college released guidelines in 1999 that recommended a surgical staff be “immediately available” when a woman with a prior Caesarean is attempting a vaginal birth. This led many hospitals, insurers and physicians to refuse services to women wanting to avoid another C-section.

    … various surveys show approximately one-third of hospitals and one-half of physicians no longer offer trial of labor to women with Caesarean scars.

    The obstetrician college’s latest revision still maintains that attempting a VBAC is safest with immediate access to an emergency Caesarean but recognizes these resources aren’t always available …

    The new guidelines state that vaginal birth after Caesarean is associated with decreased maternal morbidity and risks of complications in future pregnancies. A failed attempt, however, carries higher risks, making it important for doctors to assess which women are likely to be successful.

    Some women’s health and professional organizations … feel the changes did not go far enough in providing a birthing choice to women with prior C-sections. Despite the low risk of uterine rupture, many providers and hospitals … still have restrictions because of the recommendation a surgical staff be on hand …

    After the first caesarean, a second one is much more likely

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    TRACY HART had intended to have her first child … naturally. But when Ariane failed to move into the normal birth position, Mrs Hart was told that a caesarean was the safest option.

    Second time around, Mrs Hart, 35, was eager to try again for a natural birth, but at 41 weeks and two days into her pregnancy, she still had not gone into labour. A caesarean was ordered – because doctors thought an induction might have been too hard on her scarred uterus – and four days ago son, Saxon was born …

    … Mrs Hart said, ”I was mortified and cried, because I had mentally prepared myself for a natural birth. A lot of women who don’t have any problems giving birth don’t realise some women just don’t have a choice.”

    Unfortunately Mrs Hart didn’t know that all women have a choice about how their baby enters the world. Some choices are safer than others; some are safer for the mother while others are safer for the baby; but whatever way you look at it, all women have a choice.

    First-time mothers with no obvious health problems, and subsequent births like Mrs Hart’s where the first was by caesarean, are overwhelmingly the biggest contributors to the NSW epidemic of caesarean births, state data shows for the first time.

    Twins, and babies in the breech or other difficult positions in the uterus, account for a much smaller proportion of the one in three babies now born by caesarean section …

    During that time, the overall caesarean rate increased from 19 to 30 per cent of all births. But subsequent caesareans increased much faster, at an average 5.3 per cent a year during the study period.

    Among first-time mothers, caesareans grew fastest – on average 6.8 per cent a year – among those who did not go into labour or whose labour was induced, suggesting a big rise in planned procedures. Among first births where the woman went into labour and later delivered surgically, the increase was only 3.5 per cent a year.

    … the new data provided the first comprehensive state-wide picture of factors behind the surge in caesareans, which NSW Health has pledged to bring back to 20 per cent of all births by 2050. It suggested that concentrating on promoting normal birth among first-time mothers would have the biggest impact on reducing the overall rate …

    I have always known that promoting normal birth – via private midwifery care – to all first time Mums, all women who have had a previous caesarean, and all women who have had a previously traumatic birth – would dramatically lower the cesarean rate.

    The research … showed it was highly unlikely the increase in caesareans could be legitimately attributed to complications such as the older age and the increase in overweight mothers … because most of the rise had occurred in women with apparently few medical risks …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Mom Has Home Birth After 3 C-Sections

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or Medicare-funded private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The CNN headline has now been changed, but it originally asked if mother Aneka of Maryland was a “hero or a danger?” for defying doctor’s orders and refusing to go in for a scheduled c-section after what she now realizes were three unnecessary previous c-sections, and choosing instead to birth with a midwife in her home.

    … She saw Ricki Lake’s The Business of Being Born documentary that really questions birth in the United States, and it raised some questions in her mind. The more she researched, the more upset she got that her doctor refused to even consider the idea of a VBAC. Even then, it’s not like she just suddenly said, “Homebirth! Whoo hoo!” She tried three other hospitals, called around, and was told, “No, no, no, absolutely not!”

    Despite all the facts out there that VBACs in most women are way, WAY safer than a repeat c-section, and even that they could just let her do a “trial of labor” first, everyone just flat out told her no and told her she had no choice but to schedule her surgery. The only place she found that would even let her try was over an hour and a half away, which she decided was just too far to be considered.

    She got in contact with her local International Cesarean Awareness Network (ICAN) leader and got a lot of information from her, including the name of a midwife who would do a VBAC with her in her own home.

    Her VBAC was an amazing, emotional, healing success, and yet she’s still being called a poor example. A spokesperson for the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) says not to look at Aneka’s story and come to conclusions because she took a great risk … and yet their own release earlier this year discussed how much safer VBACs actually are.

    Aneka wasn’t a “hero” or a “danger.” She was a mom trying to figure out what was safest for her and her baby, according to all the science out there, without the intricacies of business and malpractice suits getting involved in her birth.

    … If doctors really don’t want women doing what Aneka did, maybe one of those four hospitals she called in the first place should have actually followed the recommendations of the ACOG and allowed her to try. You can’t villainize a person who you’ve backed into a corner.

    It’s a sad case when women are forced into homebirth because they cannot find a care provider and hospital to support them in their choices.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Unnecessary C-Sections on the Rise

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Australia’s caesarean rate was 31.1% in 2008.

    Link

    Five years ago, Jill Arnold got some unwanted news at her obstetrician’s office. At 37 weeks pregnant, Arnold was told her baby was too big for her body to deliver naturally. Flipping open a calendar, the obstetrician asked when Arnold would like to schedule a cesarean section.

    Fact: You cannot know that a baby is “too big” until you give labour a go.

    Unconvinced she needed the surgery — the doctor “couldn’t provide any statistics or data” her baby was too large — Arnold delivered her 10-pound, 3-ounce (4.6 kilogram) baby the old-fashioned way. Since then, the now 36-year old … delivered another baby weighing 11 pounds, and now pens a blog called The Unnecesarean.

    Women like Arnold, however, are becoming increasingly rare. Between 1996 and 2007, the number of C-sections performed in U.S. hospitals rose by more than 50 percent to an all-time high: Almost one in three pregnant women …

    “The most concerning problem is the high rate in first-time mothers,” …

    … The shift is toward a more streamlined labor and delivery, and profoundly affects mothers-to-be.

    … this shift is not likely to reverse any time soon.

    In 2009, 26-year old Ann Carter … labored for 14 hours. With her cervix dilated to only 6 centimeters … her doctor told her it was time for a C-section.

    “I was devastated and scared,” Carter said, “I knew it was a possibility but I was hoping it wouldn’t happen.”

    During the surgery, the doctor discovered the umbilical cord had wrapped around the baby’s neck, which explained why Carter’s labor had stalled. The C-section saved the baby boy’s life.

    Um, actually, it is very common for the cord to be around the baby’s neck, and it rarely causes concerns.

    “Most times the decision to perform a C-section is based on the physician’s judgment,” Zhang said, “but there are great variations in decision-making among physicians.”

    … there are “few clear-cut indications” of when to do one.

    … For example, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) lists “failure to progress” during labor, as an indication that cesarean delivery is needed … When things slow down, there is an element of judgment involved where a physician determines whether to continue to wait, induce or perform a C-section … it can take hours to determine whether or not labor is progressing.

    In Zhang’s study, however, he found that many patients weren’t given a sufficiently long time period to allow their labor to progress. In other words, doctors were calling it quits on waiting and opting for a C-section too soon — often before the patient’s cervix was dilated to 6 centimeters.

    This was especially true in cases of induced labor … Almost half of the C-sections in these women occurred before they were 6 centimeters dilated …

    Still, it is not clear whether inducing labor raises the risk of C-section, or whether other factors are involved that contribute to why women were induced in the first place …

    … Another factor contributing to the record-high cesarean rates is a drastic decline in vaginal births after cesarean … 70 percent of women in his study who had previously undergone a cesarean delivery had C-sections with their subsequent pregnancies, without attempting vaginal delivery.

    One reason for this is a fear of lawsuits. If a physician doesn’t perform a C-section, and something goes wrong with a patient who previously had a C-section, the law often does not protect the physician …

    … the number of malpractice claims involving obstetric and gynecologic surgery are the second highest of all medical specialties. In 2009, the claims totaled over $133 million.

    Fears of legal action also explain why at least 30 percent of all U.S. hospitals have official bans prohibiting VBACs …

    The risks associated with a vaginal birth following a C-section have been somewhat exaggerated, however, Zhang said.

    “Women and physicians may be concerned about uterine rupture, but the risk is less than 1 percent,” …

    To help reduce rising cesarean rates, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced less restrictive guidelines in July, stating that vaginal birth “has fewer complications than a repeat cesarean….restrictive VBAC policies should not be used to force women to undergo a repeat cesarean delivery against her will.” …

    … some medical experts have suggested the rapid rise of C-sections in the last decade is also due in small part to mothers-to-be requesting them, not doctors. Still, data on “patient choice cesareans” is lacking, as statistics used as support of their frequency are often based on ambiguous procedural codes used on hospital discharge records.

    In any case, women who opt for a C-section may not be getting adequate information about risks, and may fear they have no other option …

    … To curb the rise, many advocate giving women more autonomy over their labor and delivery, and combining the strengths of modern medicine with the principles and practices of midwifery.

    La Follette’s California office is an example of this more comprehensive approach: After participating in a larger practice for 12 years, she now works with two experienced midwives and another physician. Her practice has a successful VBAC rate of 75 percent.

    “We take into account the expectations and ideas of the mom and balance that with medical guidance,” La Follette said.

    As more women consider practices with midwives and home births — which can be dangerous if complications arise — much of the medical establishment has been digging in its heels. In 2008, the American Medical Association’s House of Delegates proposed a resolution to declare hospitals the only safe place for labor, and only midwives who work under the supervision of physicians as safe.

    The Midwives Alliance of North America declared the resolution “seriously out-of-step with the ethical concept of patient autonomy in healthcare [that] distracts from other critical issues in maternity care.”

    If there is any chance of lowering the rates of C-sections, professional organizations will need to review all the available evidence, Zhang said.

    But any change won’t be easy. On the one hand, doctors need to include expectant moms in their own care; on the other, it sometimes seems that doctors who are worried about potential legal consequences can’t focus on a patient’s best interests.

    “We’re fighting a cultural issue,” Scott said, that extends beyond C-sections.

    She said, “We need to change the entire way we view birth and we have to be able to trust our caregivers. The alternative would be terrifying.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Moms find alternatives to hospitals that say no to natural births following C-sections

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Nine months ago, Jennifer Saavedra was pregnant with her second child. After her first daughter was born by cesarean section 2½ years earlier, the Redding woman decided that she wanted to experience a natural birth at least once in her life.

    But having her child at a local hospital is almost out of the question.

    Redding’s only birthing center, Mercy Medical Center, all but refuses to perform a vaginal birth after a woman has had a previous C-section.

    The hospital’s policy isn’t unique. Because of liability and patient-safety concerns, more and more hospitals around the country have chosen to stop the practice, which experts say is contributing to a national rise in cesarean rates.

    That leaves local women like Saavedra, a 43-year-old former “figure competitor” — a type of body builder — with few options. They can either have the baby at home with a local midwife or travel several hours to a hospital in Sacramento or the San Francisco Bay area, where a doctor may elect to have a natural birth.

    … recent changes to national care standards, hospital staffing levels and threats from lawsuits also factor into Mercy officials’ decision six years ago to stop performing VBACs.

    De Soto said the risk of a complication during a VBAC actually is “very low,” Although traditionally around half of the women who try to have a VBAC at a hospital end up having a C-section anyway.

    Fairly appalling statistics! At least 75% women who choose a VBAC can be successful, provided that the environment for labour and birth is conducive to natural birth, and provided that the woman’s chosen care provider is supportive of her intention to have a VBAC.

    Fewer than 1 percent of healthy women who try a VBAC run the risk a “catastrophic event,” like tearing the scar tissue on their uterus from their first C-section …

    The tear can quickly become a massive hemorrhage, which could lead to removal of the woman’s uterus. The sudden blood loss also could choke off oxygen to the unborn baby, sometimes fatally, he said.

    De Soto said the hospital is unwilling to take that risk.

    But … multiple C-sections come with their own risks, which are often downplayed by the medical establishment.

    … multiple C-sections increase a woman’s risk of future uterine hemorrhaging and hysterectomies.

    There’s also an added risk of other problems caused by building scar tissue that develops from multiple surgeries …

    Women who have multiple C-sections have greater chances of having sexual problems, incontinence, bowel obstructions and infertility, she said.

    “I’ve never once heard a doctor mention that to a patient,” she said.

    ‘Avoid the first one’

    Although that is a really pertinent statement to make, it’s also an unfair comment. A woman having her first baby has no experience of labour and of the terrain that she will find herself in once she steps into hospital. She may not have considered homebirth, even though her chance of having a caeasrean would be far less than 10% had she chosen a homebirth with a midwife. Is it an unfair expectation that a woman having her first baby will know all that she needs to know and have the support that she needs to have, in order to avoid that first caesarean?

    Peaceman said patient safety worries — as well as multimillion-dollar malpractice lawsuits — are very much on the minds of doctors. It’s the same in Redding.

    … Saavedra said she planned her VBAC [and] … quickly decided that UC Davis would be impractical and expensive. The university hospital requires women to stay near the birth center for almost a month before the birth just in case the baby comes early, she said.

    After doing her own research, she chose to have the birth at home with McNeill.

    Sarah was born Sept. 27, a healthy 6 pounds, 9 ounces. McNeill gave Sarah her first bath in Saavedra’s bathroom sink.

    Saavedra’s story is one shared by only about 20 Redding women each year.

    McNeill, a registered nurse and licensed midwife, said she usually performs at least one VBAC every two months or so. Redding’s other midwife, Dena Burgess, said that she may do 10 a year.

    The women who elect to have the procedure are a special breed, local midwives say.

    McNeill said such women are usually health-conscious and informed. They’re also confident enough to question the medical establishment, and they’re passionate about their own health care decisions, Burgess said.

    “When women have a VBAC, it’s like so — I hate the word “empowering”; I hate that word — but it changes them,” she said.

    Renee Harris, 38, of Redding said she knows that feeling all too well.

    The home-school mother of seven children has had two VBACs. She’s planning another VBAC when her newest baby is due next month.

    She said she decided to go the home-birthing route after doctors in Colorado performed a C-section when she had twins.

    “I felt like the decisions were made for me,” Harris said of that birth … “I’m not going in for major abdominal surgery if I just don’t need it,” she said.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Increased forceps training ‘could cut caesarean births’

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Additional training in difficult births could help [lower] caesarean section operations …

    … extra training could reverse the trend for caesarean sections being used in cases where an instrumental delivery would have been more appropriate.

    … emergency caesarean sections carry a risk of “severe obstetric morbidity”, while proper use of forceps can be much safer – and make vaginal birth easier in the future …

    If an assisted birth is needed, forceps are more likely than a vacuum to result in a vaginal birth. The vacuum is more likely to slip off, sometimes several times, before a caesarean is called for, whereas the forces are far more likely to result in a vaginal birth. Having a caesarean for the first birth makes all future pregnancies and births labelled “high risk” and will dramatically lower a woman’s chance of ever having a vaginal birth. So it’s really important to maximise the possibility of a vaginal birth for the first baby. Following births are generally much quicker and easier!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    ‘Impatience’ With Labor, Low VBAC Rates Tied To C-Section Increase, Study Finds

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The rising … caesarean section rate reflects several factors — including a tendency to opt for c-sections too soon into labor, an increase in labor inductions and fewer attempts at vaginal births among women who have had previous c-sections …

    … The increases in c-section rates “have caused debate and concern” because surgical deliveries pose greater risks for women and their infants than vaginal deliveries … Women who have c-sections also have a higher risk for complications, such as placental abnormities and possible uterine rupture, in subsequent pregnancies …

    … one-third of first-time mothers had had c-sections. The increased use of drugs to induce labor might be a factor in the c-section rate among this group … Women who had labor induced were twice as likely as women who went into labor on their own to have a c-section.

    Among women who were induced and had c-sections, about half of the deliveries were performed before the cervix had dilated to six centimeters, “suggesting that clinical impatience may play a role,” …

    Caesarean rates amongst private midwives are less than 10% and in many cases, around 5%. This can be attributed to women’s preference for a natural birth but also the role of the private midwife in protecting, promoting and supporting the natural processes of pregnancy and birth and the avoidance of drugs to stimulate labour unless they are genuinely necessary.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Delivering real choice after a Caesarean

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … LOUISE McCANN felt like a “freak” when her first baby was delivered by Caesarean section, after attempts over three days to induce her failed.

    In the immediate aftermath, she was just glad Darragh had finally been born and they were both okay. “It is only down the line, when the initial elation wears off, you kind of think what went wrong?”

    It was a question that came back to haunt her when she was pregnant again within a year. Everything had been fine the first time until she went overdue; she was 28 years of age and had had a straightforward pregnancy.

    “I was a bit naive, it being my first baby, and I assumed that if I was being induced it was going to work.”

    … “I found out later I wasn’t ready to be induced.”

    On her second pregnancy she was determined to try for a VBAC … She found the consultant initially supportive but, at 38 weeks, he told her to prepare herself for another section.

    She believed he was trying to scare her into it by overstating the risks of a VBAC. “He was throwing stats at me and I would have to come back and say, ‘I looked that up and it is not true’.”

    McCann was resolute that there was no need for a section; she was healthy, there were no complications and she had not even gone full term at that stage.

    … women who go into spontaneous labour after one previous section have about 80 per cent chance of vaginal delivery …

    “When a woman has an unhappy experience with a first labour, she does not want to repeat the experience …

    As the second pregnancy progresses, inevitably the memories flood back and they get extremely anxious. They are assured the same thing won’t happen.

    … “Women who have had a normal birth and then a section can never understand why somebody would elect for a section,”

    … “The majority of women who have had a section and then a normal birth say, ‘I am glad I did that’.”

    … research in Scandinavian countries shows that if women are debriefed and counselled after an emergency section, they are more likely to opt for VBAC.

    [Debriefing gives] you some closure on what happened and help you plan for the next pregnancy …

    … “Women are not getting the information to make an informed decision as to what is the safest option in their case.”

    Generally, VBAC is associated with a lower risk of complications, for both mother and baby, than a repeat section.

    … To people who argue that all that matters is a healthy baby, not the method of delivery, she says that is exactly where VBAC comes in. “If that in the end is all that you care about, then VBAC is something you should seriously consider.”

    … “Every woman’s circumstances are different,” he adds, “but the best way is to go into labour spontaneously.”

    That is what Louise McCann was holding out for in her second pregnancy. The consultant scheduled her for a section at 12 days overdue – although she had no intention of going in – but she went into labour at home in Naas, Co Kildare the night before.

    “Things had been progressing well at home, but when I arrived in the hospital everything stopped – I suppose it was nerves and fear.

    “They were trying to push me for induction and telling me I had 12 hours and that was it …”

    When her daughter … arrived, 12 and a half hours later, McCann was relieved that she was healthy and had been born without unnecessary surgery.

    … Less than a year later she was pregnant again. Having had a VBAC, there was no pressure on her this time and she was allowed to opt for the midwifery scheme – something which had been ruled out when her history was just one section.

    … Ruth Doggett was in labour for 12 hours with her twins before it was decided to deliver them by Caesarean section.

    … The official reason given was “failure to progress” … However, she says, “if I was doing it again, having learned more about sections and things, I probably would have fought that more.”

    When Iseult and Lachlan were 15 months old, Doggett became pregnant again. She wanted a home birth but was told that having had a section, she was considered too high risk – nor was she eligible for the midwifery scheme.

    Although she had gone private for her twins, she did not want to be under the care of one consultant this time.

    “Consultants are great but they all have their own opinions and, [by] not knowing them well enough, it is hard to tell will they really have the same values and beliefs that you have – especially when the day comes.”

    She opted for semi-private care, where she was seeing midwives and registrars. “I found it fantastic. Every doctor had a different view of my situation, so it reaffirmed my belief that I had to trust my own instincts and my own bit of research of what was best for me and my baby. Then take all the information I was getting and make a decision for myself.”

    She was very keen to try for a VBAC and medical staff were supportive, telling her she had a 70 per cent chance of having one.

    However, she took issue with some of the hospital’s policies for VBACs, such as that she would be allowed only seven hours of active labour, after which she would need to have a section.

    “I was really concerned about that – the possibility of being on a clock and saying I had seven hours to give birth, to me that was just crazy.”

    She was told she would need continuous monitoring because of the risk of scar separation (which is less than 1 per cent when women go into spontaneous labour), but she wanted intermittent monitoring so she could be free to move. Also there was a policy for induction at 10 days overdue, but she wanted to be allowed to go 14 days over.

    As it turned out, she went into labour at five days over, early one Thursday morning last April. She spent the day at home … “I wanted to get as close to delivery at home so I would not be on the clock.”

    At 10pm she went into hospital to be checked. “I was 4cm [dilated] , the baby’s head was down …

    Then Doggett was questioned about things she had specified in her birth plan – such as longer time limits and no continuous monitoring. A registrar explained all the risks and asked her, she says, was she prepared to be in labour 24 hours, to have her baby flat-lining at birth or to have cerebral palsy.

    “It was an awful thing to be asked. I said, ‘I want what is happening to me in my labour to be dealt with; I don’t want to be dealt with on the basis of statistics. Obviously I want my baby to be healthy’.”

    Although she was sent to the delivery ward, she remained at 4cm. “I actually love being in labour, I know that it is a strange thing to say. I don’t find it painful; it is just a cramp. It is quite an exciting time.”

    But, conscious of the clock ticking, she was becoming stressed as she heard talk of another section. However, then she was told she was not in established labour and was being moved back to the labour ward where she should try to get some sleep.

    On Friday, one registrar said if nothing was happening by 6pm she should have her waters broken. But then word came down from a consultant that, “if I did not want any interruptions or interventions and everything was progressing fine – slow but no distress – that there was no need to get involved”.

    She was delighted with that news and was moved into the pre-natal ward. “It was fantastic; I could eat what I wanted and I was off the clock. I relaxed completely there.”

    By 10pm she felt the contractions changing and by 1am needed her Tens machine. She was found to be 7cm dilated and moved to the delivery suite.

    She agreed to her waters being broken when she was almost 10cm dilated. “Nothing happened for about 15 minutes then the second phase started and that was incredible.” One and a half hours later, at 6.50am on the Saturday morning, Caelan was born, weighing 9lb 9oz.

    … “being able to deliver him myself was empowering and kind of healing in lots of ways.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    New VBAC Guidelines Give Women More Decision-Making Power, Editorial States

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    The title’s enough to cause concern! Women always have decision-making power over their own bodies.

    Although it is “understandable” that some health care providers are “cautious” about vaginal births after caesarean sections, it “should hardly be a controversial notion” that a woman who has had a c-section “should have a say in whether to try a vaginal birth during her next delivery,” …

    … one-third of U.S. hospitals and 50% of physicians refuse to allow women to attempt VBACs “due to a fear of lawsuits over uterine ruptures,” which occur in 0.7% to 0.9% of cases … “Extremely small as that risk may be, even tiny numbers represent real women and real babies who can suffer serious consequences in a delivery gone bad,” …

    Sydney has the same situation, with some smaller hospitals not allowing VBACs owing to lack of 24/7 theatre facilities.

    However, “when up to 80% of women who are ‘allowed’ to attempt VBAC succeed, it’s not so easy to understand why all women aren’t ‘allowed’ to weigh the risks and to make their own choices regarding their own childbirth experiences,” … The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ” recently eased its guidelines to say that hospitals offering women trial labors after caesareans should have a surgical team ‘readily available’ instead of ‘immediately available,’” …

    “It’s a small change, but one that might send the precipitously declining VBAC rates headed in the right direction again,” the editorial argues, concluding, “Let these new guidelines be the impetus for giving women the information they need to weigh the risks and to be able to choose a trial labor or a repeat caesarean themselves”

    Given the risks of repeat caesareans, particularly for women who have multiple caesareans, VBAC ought to be encouraged for most women. We also need to focus on woman-friendly care in pregnancy and labour; care that affirms the woman’s belief in her ability to birth her baby and care that is sensitive and individualised.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Doctor-midwife tensions run deep

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Last week, midwives and clients of Andaluz Waterbirth Center in Portland announced plans to file a federal lawsuit to “cease intimidation and threats against midwives” by the Oregon Health Licensing Agency and Oregon Health & Science University.

    Midwives say doctors and nurses at OHSU have filed baseless complaints to the licensing agency meant to thwart competition … The threatened lawsuit spurred a passionate online debate among supporters and critics of home birth.

    Conflicts between midwives and doctors run deep. One of the biggest problems: Many physicians deal with midwives only when a laboring mother experiences difficulties during a home birth and requires transport to a hospital, sometime urgently.

    “It’s an extremely tension-fraught encounter,” according to Melissa Cheyney, an Oregon State University assistant professor and practicing midwife who studied the interactions of midwives and doctors in Jackson County last year. Nearly every physician interviewed by Cheyney and her graduate student expressed the view that births must take place in a hospital to be “safe.”

    Studies including higher-risk pregnancies have found that fetal deaths are more likely in home births. But in low-risk pregnancies, most research shows no significant difference in risk to the baby, while home-birth mothers experience fewer complications. In a study in British Columbia last year, women giving birth at home suffered fewer than half as many serious perineal tears, and about a third less postpartum bleeding.

    By choosing a hospital birth, women substantially increase the risk of having a surgical delivery. More than 29 percent of hospital births in Oregon resulted in a cesarean during the years 2006-2008. Less than 4 percent of home births ended with a cesarean in a 2005 study of 5,400 births attended by midwives in the U.S. and Canada.

    Women who choose home birth often cite the desire to keep birth free of medical intervention. Heather Hermans … transferred to the care of a midwife because she wanted to try a vaginal delivery rather than schedule a cesarean section, as her obstetrician-gynecologist recommended.

    “My ob-gyn didn’t remember me from appointment to appointment,” Hermans said. “I was treated like pregnant cow No. 45.”

    Many women will choose midwifery care to receive personalised care where they can develop a relationship with the midwife who will attend their birth.

    Hermans experienced complications during labor and took an ambulance to OHSU, where a surgeon delivered her healthy baby boy by emergency C-section. The surgeon filed a complaint about Hermans’ midwife to the state … Roy Haber, an attorney hired by the midwives, said the Oregon Health Licensing Agency withdrew all six investigations after he challenged them.

    Conflicts aren’t inevitable. Cheyney is working with midwives in Lane County and a Eugene obstetrician, Dr. Paul Qualtere-Burcher, on guidelines for smoother, more collaborative relations. Qualtere-Burcher and his colleagues have agreed to help midwives get access to laboratory testing and ultrasound screening for their clients. Midwives are referring higher-risk home birth clients to the physicians for assessment and another perspective.

    “We’d like them to come in and see us before it becomes a big issue during labor,” Qualtere-Burcher said. “I think it’s been very successful.”

    Home birth by the numbers

    Planned home births in Oregon last year: 877 out of 47,675 total births, or 1.8 percent.

    Risk of baby dying in a midiwife-attended home birth: 1.7 percent versus 0.6 percent in hospitals, based on a 2009 British study including women with breech births, twins, or attempting a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean (VBAC).

    I’d be interested to see what these stats are when high risk homebirths are removed from the data set, or to analyse the risk of each “risk factor” in isolation to determine the riskier “high risk” situations, for example, is HBAC less risky than twin homebirth?

    Risk of baby dying in a midwife-attended home birth when comparing only low-risk mothers: 0.5 percent versus 0.3 percent in hospitals.

    Chances of giving birth without medical intervention: 78 percent with a home-birth midwife versus 54 percent in hospitals, according to the 2009 British study.

    A women’s chances of having cesarean section when giving birth in an Oregon hospital, 2006-2008: 29 percent.

    Fetal deaths in births attended by licensed midwives in Oregon, 2001-2007: 4 in 2,906 births, about 0.1 percent.

    Fetal deaths in births attended by physicians in Oregon, 2001-2007: 1,455 in 274,278 births, about 0.5 percent.

    This would account for the fact that midwives mostly manage uncomplicated pregnancies and births, while doctors are referred higher risk women and babies.

    Number of home birth midwives who are licensed in Oregon: 64, up from 54 in 2008.

    Complaints lodged against licensed midwives, 1999-2007: 40.

    Disciplinary actions imposed by the Board of Direct Entry Midwifery, 2000-2004: 12

    Midwife guide

    Direct Entry Midwife – A general term for practitioners who train directly into midwifery without a nursing or medical background, and attend births outside of hospitals. Oregon law allows direct entry midwives to practice with no licensure.

    Certified Professional Midwife — Direct entry midwives certified by the North American Registry of Midwives, which requires written and practical examinations and practical experience attending 40 births.

    Licensed Direct Entry Midwife — Direct entry midwives who obtain a license in Oregon are authorized to use some prescription drugs and medical devices. They must pass a national examination, demonstrate experience in attending births, and complete continuing education every three years. They are licensed by the Oregon Board Direct Entry Midwifery and subject to disciplinary actions if they violate professional standards.

    Certified Nurse Midwife – Registered nurses who go on to complete an accredited nurse-midwifery program. Oregon requires certified nurse midwives to obtain a Masters degree. CNMs are the only midwives that practice in hospitals. They are licensed by the Oregon State Board of Nursing.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    New guidelines say vaginal birth OK after c-section

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Even if they aren’t staffed to handle emergency cesarean sections, hospitals should respect a woman’s informed choice to have a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), new guidelines say.

    VBAC is known to increase the risk that the scar left in the womb from a previous cesarean will tear during labor, leading to massive bleeding that can threaten the baby’s life. That has led to previous guidelines urging caution for women who have had cesarean sections.

    But recent research shows so-called uterine rupture occurs in less than one percent of women who opt for vaginal birth, and that between 60 and 80 percent of VBACs are completed successfully.

    While the new guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) still say a full surgical team should be present in case an emergency cesarean is required, they now put a bigger emphasis on the woman’s decision.

    “Respect for patient autonomy supports that patients should be allowed to accept increased levels of risk; however, patients should be clearly informed of such potential increase in risk and management alternatives,” they say.

    “For most women with a previous cesarean delivery, a trial of labor is a safe and appropriate option,” …

    … Even women who’ve had two prior cesareans might be good candidates for vaginal birth …

    … Today, about nine in 10 pregnant women … end up with a repeat cesarean if they’ve already had one. By comparison about a third of all women who give birth have cesareans.

    “… the cesarean rates are going up too fast,” … “There is no good evidence that newborns are better off now than they were 20 years ago.”…

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Who controls childbirth: women or doctors?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    That I am pregnant again is an act of either incredible optimism or mind-blowing amnesia. As the sonogram technician squirts jelly over my abdomen for my 20-week checkup, I think it’s the latter. Watching this baby, who the tech tells me is a boy, I am not caught up in visions of his future; I’m caught up in visions of mine. All of a sudden, I know with a certainty I haven’t allowed myself to confront before: Somehow, I am going to have to deliver this baby.
    Obviously, you say. But my first birth was traumatic, and although my son and I emerged fine, I lost a year seeking treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder and all the depression, fear and anger it brings. I imitated mothers who seemed normal to me, cooing and tickling my son. In truth, I was a zombie, obsessing about how I had ever let what happened happen.

    What happened is this: In my 39th week, I am induced because of high blood pressure. At the hospital, I am given Pitocin, a synthetic form of the labor-inducing hormone oxytocin, and Cervidil, a vaginal insert used to dilate the cervix. Within two hours, my contractions are one minute apart. I had lasted as long as I could without an epidural because I had read that they sometimes slow dilation. That’s the last thing I need: I’m at a pathetic 2 centimeters. My doctor comes up with a solution for the pain: a syringe full of a narcotic called Stadol.

    “I have a history of anxiety,” I tell the nurse who has brought in the syringe, as I always warn any medical professional who wants to give me drugs. “Is this drug OK for me?” “It sure is,” she says.

    It is not. Within 10 seconds, I begin hallucinating. For five hours, I hallucinate that I’m on a swing that’s soaring too high, that houses are flying at my face. My husband has fallen asleep on the cot next to me, and I’m convinced that if awakened, he will turn into a monster — literally. I’m aware this notion is irrational, that these images are hallucinations. But they are terrifying. I buzz the nurse. “Sometimes that happens,” she says …

    By noon the next day, 24 hours after I had arrived, I am only 3 centimeters dilated. The new nurse, a nice lady, tells me the induction isn’t working. “Your blood pressure isn’t even high anymore,” she says. “Tell the doctor you want to go home.”

    When my OB comes in, I say, “I’d like to stop this induction, if that’s possible. I’m worn out. I hallucinated all night … I just don’t think this is working out.”

    “OK,” he says. “Let me examine you. If you’re still not dilating, we’ll talk about going home.”

    My previous dilation exams had been quick and painless, if not entirely pleasant. This one takes a long time. Suddenly, it hurts. “What are you doing?” I scream. “Why does it hurt?”

    No answer.

    “He’s not examining me,” I scream at my husband. “He’s doing something!” My husband grips my hand, frozen, unsure.

    I scream to the nurse, the nice one who had suggested I go home. “What is he doing?” She doesn’t answer me, either. I writhe under the doctor’s grasp. The pain is excruciating.

    The first sound I hear is the doctor’s directive to the nurse, in a low voice: “Get me the hook.”

    I know the hook is for breaking my water, to speed my delivery by force. I scream, “Get off of me!” He looks up at me, as if annoyed that the specimen is talking. I imagine him thinking of the cadavers he worked on in medical school, how they didn’t scream, how they let him do whatever he wanted.

    “You’re not going anywhere,” he says. He breaks my water and leaves. The nurse never looks me in the eye again.

    Eleven more futile hours of labor later, I am exhausted and terrified when the doctor comes in and claps his hands together. “Time for a C-section,” he says. I consider not signing the consent form, ripping off these tubes and monitors, and running. But the epidural I’d finally gotten won’t allow me to stand up.

    It’s nearly midnight when I hear a cry. My first emotion is surprise; I had almost forgotten I was there to have a baby.

    I was desperate to find someone who could tell me what had happened to me was normal. To say, “You hallucinated? Oh, me, too.” Or “My doctor broke my water when I wasn’t looking. Isn’t that the worst?” Nothing …

    Now, I’d never loved my doctor … I’d found him patronizing — “Normal!” he’d shout at me, when I asked a question — I thought his assuredness might be a good antidote to my anxiousness. It seemed to work, until it didn’t.

    … I also didn’t have a birth plan … Sure, I had a plan for the birth: Have a baby using whatever breathing method I’d learned in the hospital’s birth-preparedness class, maybe get an epidural. But I didn’t have the piece of paper that so many of my friends have brought to the hospital with them … in my opinion, the very act of creating such a contract was to ignore what labor is: something unpredictable that you are in no way qualified to dictate.

    … people who hear my story ask … Did I consider a home birth? A midwife instead of an obstetrician? … The answer is no. I am not holistically minded. My philosophy was simple: Everyone I know has been born. It can’t be that complicated.

    The women who ask me about my preparations for my first son’s birth — who imply with these questions that I could have prevented what happened to me if I’d been more diligent — are part of an informal movement of women who are trying to “take back” their birth — take it back from the hospital, the insurers and anyone else who thinks he can call the shots.

    But hospitals aren’t so interested in giving women back their birth … stipulations dealing with labor and delivery (“I want only one medical professional in the room at a time”) garner barely a glance. University OB/GYN in Provo, Utah, even has a sign that reads, “…we will not participate in: a ‘Birth Contract’, a Doulah [sic] Assisted, or a Bradley Method delivery. For those patients who are interested in such methods, please notify the nurse so we may arrange transfer of your care.”

    … This question of whether I could have prevented my trauma has lingered in my mind since that day; now that I am pregnant again, it has become deafening. I have a chance to do it all over. Would I benefit from thinking more holistically? Should I bother taking back my birth?

    During my pregnancies, friends gave me two books; their spines are still barely cracked. The first is called “Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth.” … The other book is “Your Best Birth” by Ricki Lake and Abby Epstein; it’s an offshoot of their 2008 documentary, “The Business of Being Born.” Their urgent message is that women who want to deliver vaginally can do so if no one intervenes. Instead, doctors and hospitals are doing all they can to “help” the laboring woman along … and failing. Inductions like mine, epidurals given early in labor, continuous fetal-heart monitoring — all of them have been associated with a higher risk for cesarean section. The result is an epidemic — 32 percent of U.S. births were C-sections at last count, the highest rate in our history. Individual surgeries may be medically necessary, but as a matter of public health, the best outcomes for mothers and babies come with a rate of no more than 15 percent, according to the World Health Organization.

    Sam … was five months pregnant when watching “The Business of Being Born” convinced her that hospitals could be dangerous and a home birth would be more meaningful. She and her husband found a midwife … and spent the rest of the pregnancy preparing.

    After 24 hours of labor, Sam’s contractions were two or three minutes apart, yet when her midwife examined her, she was only 3 centimeters dilated. The midwife gently told her that she was nowhere close to delivering, despite her contractions, exhaustion and pain. Sam asked to be taken to the hospital.

    The change of scenery did her good. “At that point, I had been in labor for 40 hours,” she says. “I entered the relaxed zone. The epidural took the edge off … It was a sacred space.”

    After her son’s delivery, Sam passed out, having lost 50 percent of her blood volume in a postpartum hemorrhage. Needless to say, she was relieved that she was in a place where blood transfusions were readily available … she believes she will want midwife care at a hospital next time.

    … Bialik’s first birth didn’t go the way she wanted. After three days of labor at home, she stalled at 9 centimeters, one short of the goal. Her midwife suggested they go to the hospital, where after a natural childbirth, Bialik’s son spent four days in the neonatal intensive-care unit. “My son was born with a low temperature and low blood sugar, which isn’t unusual in light of the fact that I had gestational diabetes,” she explains. “I understand doctors need to err on the side of caution, but there was nothing wrong with my child. All of our plans for bed sharing, nursing on demand, bathing him — gone.”

    The experience was scarring. “I felt a sense of failure that I had to call my parents from the hospital,” Bialik continues. “Yes, I know vaginal birth in the hospital is the next best thing to a home birth.” …

    I point out that natural childbirth in the hospital — her “failure” — was my best-case scenario. But I also understand when she says, “Everyone is allowed her own sense of loss.” She realized her vision when her second son was born at home.

    The second time around
    I don’t consider myself a candidate for a home birth. The risk of uterine rupture from an attempt at vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) makes it unthinkable … I’m also not really interested in a home birth … But I’m also not interested in another C-section …

    So I’d like to attempt a VBAC, but I know that it doesn’t always succeed. I have a new doctor — the 10th I interviewed following my son’s birth — at a new hospital, and he has agreed to help me try. But my primary goal is more modest: not to be retraumatized. Even now, my heart pounds at the sight of hospital receiving blankets, the antiseptic smell of the maternity ward.

    The common thread in Bialik’s and Sam’s stories that impressed me was how supported and safe they felt with their midwife …

    In an e-mail Bialik sends after our meeting, she goes back to my idea that some women weren’t meant to have babies the holistic way. “There are those among us who believe that if the baby can’t survive a home labor, it is OK for it to pass peacefully,” she writes. “I do not subscribe to this, but I know that some feel that … if a baby cannot make it through birth, it is not favored evolutionarily.”

    I think about my appendectomy, back in 2003. Had I not made it to the hospital in time, I would be dead. What would it be like to refuse medical intervention? I’d call my family, say my good-byes. “I’m sorry,” I’d say. “But I’m not evolutionarily favored. It’s time for me to go.”

    This attitude, that everything was better back when there were no doctors, seems strange to me. C-sections, although certainly done too often, can save lives. Orthodox Jews still say the same prayer after childbirth that those who have been in near-death experiences say — and with good reason. A birth that leaves mother and child healthy may be commonplace, but it’s also a miracle every time.

    As the weeks pass and my belly grows, I can’t stop thinking about Sam. Her pregnancy was a sacred time, and she had truly looked forward to labor. Is that what I should try for — a meaningful birth, as well as an untraumatic one? At what point had people like Sam and me learned to feel entitled to a meaningful birth?

    “I think that birth should be a beautiful experience,” says obstetrician Kimberly D. Gregory, M.D. She’s the vice chair of women’s health care quality and performance improvement at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in L.A. “It should be exactly the way you want it, and doctors should intervene only to preserve the health or life of you or your baby.”

    Naturally, one would assume that Dr. Gregory advocates birth plans. When I ask her this, she laughs. “We always say, ‘If you show up with a birth plan, just get the C-section room ready,’” she says. “You get everything on that list that you don’t want. It’s like a self-fulfilling prophecy.” Dr. Gregory led an unpublished study that compared women who took traditional hospital birth classes with those who employed Bradley-like training and a birth plan. The birth-plan group trended toward a higher C-section rate and more interventions. “There’s a certain personality type that tends to be more anxious. Maybe the anxiety hormones themselves put them at risk,” Dr. Gregory theorizes. “It seems that being open and honest and choosing the right doctor is probably a better option than writing everything down. Walking in with this list appears to set up an antagonistic relationship.” …

    … In the past three weeks, I’ve had the same dream. I’m in a field (I believe at Ina May Gaskin’s Farm), and women in braids are dancing around me as my baby is born, painlessly, joyously. As I reach down, I notice my C-section scar is gone.

    I wake up upset. Am I truly under the impression, subconscious though it may be, that taking back this birth will undo the damage of the last one?

    “I don’t understand this phrase ‘take back your birth,’” nurse-midwife Pam England, creator of “Birthing From Within,” … tells me. “Who took it? What would a woman tell herself it meant about her if she failed to meet the criteria she made up for ‘taking back’ her birth? I am concerned that this phrase, meant to generate action and a feeling of empowerment, may actually be generated by or feeding the victim part of her.”

    England is right: Having a childbirth that I deem successful this time will not change what I haven’t overcome from the first. I try to find a way to make what my doctor and nurses did to me OK, but my mind rebels. I feel loss — no, theft — of an opportunity for me to have a baby the way so many other women do: a carefree pregnancy, a labor that could still go any way.

    Maybe I’m not so different from the women I spoke with, after all. Bialik had a successful natural childbirth but felt like a failure because it was in the hospital. Women who had a C-section also used words like failure. Perhaps part of the problem is that our generation of women is so ambitious, so driven, that we don’t know how to do anything without quantifying it as a success or failure.

    According to Dr. Gregory, women are now requesting a C-section for their first birth, even without indication. “A lot of people are uncomfortable with the unknown,” she says. Plenty of people are wary of C-sections by choice, from holistic moms to obstetricians. But isn’t this, too, taking back your birth? Refusing to be out of control seems to me the epitome of taking it back. You don’t have to have an unattended birth in the woods to be considered a real woman.

    Deciding that you can’t control the uncontrollable — and committing to that decision when you are, in fact, out of control — is also taking back your birth. It’s what your grandmothers did. It’s what their grandmothers did.

    With this, I realize that I have already taken back my birth, but not as part of any movement. I have stopped judging women who take extra precautions as defensive and started to understand that everyone has to find her way.

    I don’t know how this story ends. I’m still not convinced my body was made to deliver vaginally. But here’s what I do know: I will insist on kindness. I will insist on care. And I hope I will be open to being treated kindly. It’s harder than it seems.

    I have another hope, too. I hope there will be a moment when … I will look down at my baby — whether he is handed to me on my belly or from behind a curtain as my body is sewn shut — and I will remember what I’ve known from the beginning, when I looked down at that plus sign and we were alone together for the first time. Before these questions wrapped around my neck, choking me for answers. I will know that I am his mother and he is my son. And maybe, in that moment, I will be ready to say that the only success and failure is the outcome of the birth, that we are healthy …

    I’m concerned that birth is defined in terms of success and failure, and that after this author’s journey, she has determined that health is the only important factor. In this day and age, it is entirely possible to have a safe VBAC – a safe birth experience as well as a satisfying one. The vast majority of women who choose VBAC will be successful provided that they choose the right care provider.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    VBAC Women Denied Acces to Midwifery Care in Most States!

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Although this article is from America, we can expect tis to transfer to Australia in just 19 days! That’s right, in just 19 days midwives will not be able to autonomously care for women who are planning VBACs. All women requesting a VBAC will have a consultation with an obstetrician and although the woman would have booked with her private midwife for private midwifery care, her ongoing care will be determined by the obstetrician. She can expect to see the obstetrician several times in her pregnancy, homebirth will be denied to her as an option and when in hospital, the obstetrician will determine the way the woman is cared for. Any non-compliance will be met with refusal of care.

    Read on for the situation in Alaska. It’s coming to Australia in less than 3 weeks.

    One thing that has been on my mind lately, is my inability to utilize the services of a midwife. Unfortunately, because I have had two cesareans, heck, even if I had only had one, I am not allowed to use a midwife for my pregnancy and birth in the state of Alaska. I know that I can do prenatal care through a midwife who has a backup, but they cannot do my actual labor and birth. They are subject to losing their license if they do accept me as a client.

    I don’t know who is familiar with it, but if you look at the medical model of maternity care and the midwifery model, you’ll see that the outcomes of both models are drastically different, with the midwifery model being the more positive of the two.

    And Alaska isn’t the only state that does this. A lot of them do … it’s ridiculous that women attempting VBACs are being denied access to midwifery care …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Bring back VBAC

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Deaths and severe complications in pregnancy and childbirth are increasing in the United States … More pregnant women today are older and obese, and childbirth practices have changed greatly over the past two decades with more cesarean sections and induction of labor …

    Why is having a baby today less safe than it was two decades ago? Two studies … make suggestions for addressing the crisis …

    … vaginal birth after cesarean is “a reasonable choice for the majority of women.” … although both elective repeat cesarean section and VBAC are highly safe, maternal death was higher for elective repeat Cesarean sections (0.013% versus 0.004% for a trial of labor). The rates of hysterectomy, hemorrhage and transfusions did not differ between the two groups. Uterine rupture — the complication that is usually given for discouraging VBACs — was rare but higher in the trial of labor group (0.47% compared with 0.03% in the repeat C-section group). Infant death was higher in the trial of labor group (0.13% compared with 0.05% in the repeat C-section group).

    About one-third of all births today in the U.S. are cesareans, and the most common reason for needing a C-section is that the mother has already had one. But recent studies show that two or more cesareans increase the risk of dangerous complications of the placenta that may be contributing to the increase in maternal deaths in recent years. That complication may prove to be more significant than the risk of uterine rupture in a woman attempting a VBAC …

    It’s time to start reversing C-section rates in part by allowing VBACs …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    changes to medicare obstetrics

    It will cost more out of pocket to have an obstetrician. Conversely, midwifery will attract medicare benefits after November, making private midwifery care more affordable to families.

    waterbirths in sydney

    The easiest way to have a waterbirth is to contract a private midwife and have a home waterbirth. Some hospitals are offering waterbirth. Sometimes it will depend on having a room available with a bath in it; other times it will depend on which midwife is on staff as some are accredited to do waterbirths and others aren’t.

    antenatal classes sydney and independent childbirth educators sydney

    The best value antenatal classes are with Julie Clarke who is an experienced childbirth educator and Calmbirth (R) Practitioner.

    can i refuse use of forceps

    You can refuse anything you don’t want to have. Often obstetricians will use a vacuum rather than forceps. Avoiding an epidural is the best way to avoid forceps or a vacuum.

    can you go public if you have phi maternity

    Absolutely! PHI is there in case you need it, but having it doesn’t mean you have to use it.

    caseload midwifery and homebirth

    Homebirth is the original caseload midwifery model! Each woman books with her own midwife, one she has sought out, trusts and knows well. That same midwife attends all the woman’s pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    cost of a private midwife sydney

    Anywhere from $3000 upwards. Most are around $3000 – $5000. It’s money well spent.

    how will homebirth be affected by the health reform australia 2010

    Truth is, we still don’t know. We’re awaiting another draft of the Quality and Safety Framework. As soon as something is released publicly, I’ll place it on this blog.

    which is safer hospital or midwife?

    It’s not really an either / or because midwives work in hospitals as well as in the community. Midwives attend every birth. In some cases, a doctor will also attend, but every birth is attended by a midwife.

    can I have a waterbirth after a caesarean?

    Of course you can!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Birth trauma symptoms

    The symptoms of birth trauma are many and varied. A common theme is that the trauma interferes with your enjoyment of daily life. The trauma issues may surface at different times, and then completely disappear.

    Some women experience:

  • Flashbacks of the event and sudden, vivid memories. You will usually feel distressed, anxious or panicky when you’re exposed to things that remind you of the event
    Avoidance of anything that reminds you of the event. Some women never talk about their births or avoid hospitals. In contrast, other women talk about their birth trauma all the time; this is their way of expressing their extreme hurt, anger and fear.
    You may also experience emotions such as anger, irritability, and hyper-vigilance (feeling jumpy or on-guard all the time)
    Nightmares of the birth
    Physiological responses when you are exposed to events resembling the traumatic event, such as panic attacks, sweating and palpitations
    Numbed emotions
  • benefits of birthing by midwives over doctors

    The msin benefits of using a midwife are:

    Higher chance of natural birth
    Continuity of care: you have the same midwife for pregnancy, labour, birth and postnatal care. Even with a private obstetrician, you’ll be attended by midwives you have not met when you’re in labour and afterwards when you stay in the ward with your new baby. If you choose midwifery care, especially private midwifery care (no private health insurance needed), you have the same person looking after you the whole way through.

    do you need informed consent episiotomy

    Most definitely! The only time consent is not needed is in a genuine emergency. Since women are generally awake for their births, there is no reason why your midwife or doctor would not seek your permission before doing an episiotomy, even in an emergency situation. Remeber – you can always say no to an episiotomy.

    duty of care to an unborn child

    Midwives and obstetricians do owe a duty of care to the baby. Babies do nto have any rights until they are born alive and take their first breath. Once they do that, they are afforded the full rights of a person.

    no obstetrician for birth in private hospital

    Currently, it is not possible to birth in a private hospital without an obstetrician. However, you can have a private midwife and a private obstetrician at aprivate hospital.

    private birthing classes at home, Sydney

    Yes, this is possible. See here.

    will homebirth be legal after July, 2010?

    Absolutely! Homebirth has always been, and will always be, legal. The ability for midwives to practice in women’s homes is dependent on the midwife reporting every homebirth, letting women know that we are not insured for births at home, and also agreeing to abide by a quality and safety framework. This is all designed to give the public greater confidence in private midwifery services and to increase safety for women and babies.

    Birth providers who support vbac in sydney

    The best way of achieving a VBAC in Sydney is to contract a private midwife to provide your care. Private midwives have roughly a 90% VBA success rate.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Women struggle to avoid serial C-sections

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Gina Crosley-Corcoran could feel the ghost of a knife slice her lower abdomen as she gave birth to her first child by cesarean section. Even the healthy birth of her oldest son, Jonas, couldn’t erase that haunting memory.

    “[It] … was a very traumatic experience,” … “So when we decided to get pregnant again, I knew that I wanted to have a vaginal birth.”

    Crosley-Corcoran’s feelings aren’t uncommon among women whose doctors say they need to have emergency C-sections, often after hours of labor. C-sections account for 31.8 percent of births in the United States and the rate has risen more than 50 percent in the past 11 years.

    Our caesarean rate here in Australia is the same …

    That contrasts sharply with the World Health Organization’s recommendation that C-sections should account for no more than 15 percent of births in low-risk women. The numbers can be disheartening for women who know C-sections are major abdominal surgeries that come with all the risks of any major surgery – and they’re being performed for reasons that have nothing to do with a disease or medical condition.

    Only about 11 percent of women in the United States had VBACs in 2003 …

    Again, similar figures for Australia.

    In response to the heightening conflict, the National Institutes of Health held a VBAC consensus conference this week. Many women hoping to avoid repeat cesarean sections are being deprived of the choice, the conference panel announced late Wednesday. The independent panel of health care providers and policy makers emerged from the conference with new recommendations aiming to correct the complex medical, legal, economic, social and research issues at the root of the debate … despite three days of meetings and speeches, the recommendations are still largely left open to interpretation.

    The issue remains a subject of a hot debate between women who don’t feel they should be forced into surgery and doctors and hospitals that say the risks of VBACs – including uterine scar rupture during labor – outweigh those of repeat C-sections.

    “We certainly support the concept of people having choice and are happy to have people undergo a trial of labor, but I think also we want to convey to them what the risks and benefits are in their individual circumstances,” …

    Yet critics argue … the high success birth rates of VBACs … between 60 and 80 percent … [and] the extremely low risk of uterine scar rupture, which … occurs in less than 1 percent of women.

    Some health care professionals believe key risks involve legal as well as medical issues.

    “It has to start with tort reform, that’s the bottom line. Until that happens, I will recommend every doctor not to do vaginal birth after cesarean, only because it’s going to put them in more jeopardy [of being sued if it goes badly],” said Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, a physician and home birth doctor in Rolling Meadows. “In our society today, there’s no tolerance. If something bad happens, someone has to pay for it.”

    A CLASH OF VALUES

    … “[My doctor] wasn’t going to support … my VBAC,” she said. “I saw myself going back down this road where I was just going to end up with another C-section and I knew that I had to get myself informed and get myself a really good support system.”

    … Crosley-Corcoran … hoped to give birth at home to avoid unnecessary hostilities at the hospital. But when her contractions started … she … took a taxi to … hospital.

    “The minute I got there it was kind of a battle,” she said. “… a lot of doctors don’t get why birth is important to women.” …

    Crosley-Corcoran said she fought throughout her 38-hour labor with doctors and nurses who said she needed another C-section.

    … “To me, the most inappropriate behavior was the scare tactics.”

    COMMON PRACTICE

    Dr. Melissa Dugan-Kim, an OB-GYN … said in the last five years she has done nearly 300 C-sections and 200 vaginal deliveries.

    “Our practice always offers the option [of repeat elective C-sections], and a lot of women choose to have another one,” she said. “They like the idea that it’s scheduled. They go in and know what’s happening, avoiding any chance of an emergency.”

    Language! “Avoiding the chance of an emergency” … when we focus on these emergency situations, of course women will feel fearful and opt for an elective caesarean. But if we put the numbers into perspective: the risk of a uterine rupture (0.5%) versus the risk of everything that can (and does) ngo wrong with caesarean: increased blood loss, infection, blood clots, increased use of medication, complications from epidurals and so on, not to mention the risks for future pregnancies, VBAC is by far the safer option.

    Dugan-Kim, who also does VBACs, attributed the rising number of C-sections to an increase in assisted reproductive technology … which leads to a consequent increase in twins and multiples who need to be delivered via C-section to be born safely.

    Twins can be born vaginally, safely!

    “But no one thinks about the bad [consequences of C-sections],” Dugan-Kim said. “Everyone thinks they’re going to get pregnant, have an easy pregnancy and take home a healthy baby. That’s not always the case.”

    Jamie Grumet knew having a baby would be painful and even stressful. But she didn’t realize how hard it would really be …

    … Grumet arrived … Hospital … Things were slow to progress. A nurse had to break her water early the next morning and it wasn’t until mid-day when Grumet’s doctor gave her the go-ahead to push.

    Do women need the permission of their doctor to push? In natural labour, women feel the sensations to push just as people feel the sensation to defecate or urinate. We do not have people by our side in the bathroom directing us on having a bowel motion. Bithing is the same. When women tune into their body’s signals, the urge to push will usually come at the right time and will result in the birth of a baby … no cheer squads required! Of course, if women opt out of vaginal examinations in labour, the whole business of breaking waters and being told when and how to push can be avoided.

    “I was all excited,” she said. “My husband, Josh, was on one leg and the nurse was on the other. They were telling me I was doing a great job, but I was pushing for about an hour and [the baby] was still really high up.”

    I’m not surprised! Are you? Pushing on her back, with her legs in human stirrups, is the most unphysiological position to birth a baby in. Didn;t anyone think to move her to a good birthing position such as kneeling or all fours??

    Grumet’s doctor attempted to manually re-position the baby for a vaginal delivery but failed. She told Grumet she needed an emergency C-section because, if she continued to push, she could risk breaking her narrow pelvis.

    This is highly unlikely … scare tactics again! Repositioning this woman was never thought of, just caesarean. It’s cheap and safe to change positions. When we stay still in labour, we are not helping our bodies and our babies through birth. Birth requires movement and we need to move to enable this process to occur.

    “That 20 minutes between the time they prep you for the C-section and you actually go into surgery was probably the worst, scariest, awful 20 minutes of my life,” she said. “I knew I was in good hands. It’s just that I was so alone and they lay your arms out on the table literally like Jesus on a cross.”

    Just 20 minutes after she was wheeled into surgery, baby Ellie was born. Although Grumet understands her C-section was necessary, she said her birthing experience didn’t go as she had hoped.

    Her caesarean was not necessarily “necessary”. As it reads, this woman was not offered all that was on offer to ensure a vaginal birth.

    … Grumet’s doctor said any subsequent deliveries must be via C-section.

    Of course! And this plants the seed for the next time this woman gets pregnant. She will approach her new careprovider saying, “my last doctor said I have to have caesareans from now on” and if her new careprovider simply goes along with this, this woman will always have caesareans. How different things would have been if her doctor had explained why she performed the caesarean, and had told her the facts: that she has around an 80%-90% chance of having a sussessful VBAC if she books with a private midwife and avoids obstetric care.

    C-sections have become such a common practice that 90 percent of women who give birth that way once will do so again …

    “My doctor said, for the next baby, it’ll be a lot different because I’m having an elective, scheduled C-section. You can have your Starbucks in the morning and have your baby in the afternoon,” she said. “I think I would be mentally prepared, knowing I was going into surgery, so I’d be ok with it.”

    We read how they make an elective caesarean seem like no big deal, and certainly better than an emergency caesarean. But the obstetricians will be heard to say, “I discussed the options with this woman and she chose a caesarean. Women seem to prefer them these days. They like the ability to schedule the birth” and so it goes.

    More than 24 hours into Crosley-Corcoran’s VBAC, her doctor became more insistant that she needed a C-section.

    “He said that my uterus … ‘just might not work,’ so I needed to have a C-section,” … “He said I’d had enough time and my ‘trial of labor’ had failed. He said it was a case of ‘failure to progress,’ at which point I shot back, ‘No! It’s a failure to WAIT.’”

    Crosley-Corcoran continued to resist.

    A TANGLED WEB

    Situations like Crosley-Corcoran’s stem from a complex web of causes.

    “I think it speaks to the many different pressures in our health care system,” … “It has to do with regionalization of health care. It has to do with, probably, to some degree, the professional liability climate. It has to do with societal attitudes toward cesarean and vaginal delivery.”

    … “It’s not that those hospitals are being mean, per say, but they’re constrained by guidelines and circumstances. In that sense it’s not really necessarily their fault,” he said. “It’s really system-wide change that people need to make … if people feel this is an important thing.”

    … “Unfortunately, lawyers have characterized doctors as just out to hurt people and do bad things,” said Eisenstein, who also has a law degree. “I don’t buy that for a second. I’m as big a critic of medicine and doctors as can be, but I can tell you, left unconstrained, doctors will do the right thing 999 times out of 1,000.”

    PLAYING THE CARD THAT’S DEALT

    … Crosley-Corcoran’s experience turned out differently. She said eventually her doctor told her Jules’ heart rate was fine and she could continue to labor. Crosley-Corcoran took responsibility for whatever happened. For her, the struggle was completely worth it.

    … “Getting my VBAC and knowing that I did it … it’s just the most miraculous and powerful, unbelievable feeling.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Florida Agency Set to Ban VBAC in State’s Birth Centers

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration is expected to permanently ban Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) in the state’s birth centers. In response, BirthGirlz, a national nonprofit based in Florida, is mounting a legal challenge, arguing that the ban is beyond the scope of the state health agency’s role.

    The ban aims to close the loop on what is already a stringent policy on VBACs in Florida. To have a non-surgical birth after a C-section, women are compelled to go to hospitals that permit it (which are not accessible throughout the state), or, if a physician signs off on the procedure, they can have one at home with the guidance of a licensed midwife. VBACs currently don’t occur in Florida birthing centers because of what is being a called a “de facto ban” due to outdated language in the state regulations. The language, which will be updated this week, will turn the ban from de facto to explicit—making VBACs illegal in all of Florida licensed birthing facilities.

    Miriam Pearson-Martinez, a licensed midwife who serves on the Pushing for VBAC committee of BirthGirlz, said that the organization has hired an attorney and will file a legal challenge to the ban when the AHCA moves to amend its regulatory language.

    “We believe that the role of our law, and the agency’s duty, is to provide access to birth centers, not limit access, and that this ban is outside the scope of its role,” Pearson-Martinez said.

    She noted that licensed Florida midwives are legally permitted to oversee VBACs, so long as a physician signs off on it, and that not all birth centers are owned by midwives—marking the ban as a move that conflicts with legal activities.

    The AHCA contends that this week’s adjustment is merely cleaning up its language, rather than an attempt to make any new restrictions on VBACs, birthing centers, or midwives …

    “I might be able to believe that, but at the same time … the AHCA intends to reduce the maximum number of births a woman can have before she is allowed to use a birth center. While before a woman who had seven births can have her eighth child at a birth center, she now will not be able to do so if she’s had more than five births.

    … the ban is troubling, especially given recent statistics that reveal a 12% chance of something going wrong with a VBAC in a hospital setting, compared to a 4% chance in a birth center.

    “There’s not a single statistic that justifies this (ban),” …by restricting women’s ability to give birth where she chooses, the Florida policy will lead to dangerous consequences—including women having unassisted births at home or the prosecution of licensed midwives.

    “Throughout history, the traditional medical field has frowned upon midwives, and this (ban) seems to be taking another step to maintain the power of their industry,” … “It seems like a ploy for doctors to say this is one more thing midwives can’t do, one more thing to have control over.”

    Nationally, VBAC rates have declined since 1996, while the delivery rates for cesareans are increasing … cesarean deliveries in 2005 are at the fourth highest rate of the world’s developed nations, behind Italy, Mexico, and Korea. This rate is exacerbated by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2004 recommendation that women not attempt a normal birth after a C-section if a hospital does not have round-the-clock obstetrics and anesthesia backup. Likewise, medical practitioners’ fear of being sued if something goes wrong with the procedure has also discouraged VBACs.

    … about 45% of hospitals in the United States formally ban VBACs either explicitly or through unsupportive policies and procedures.

    … the rate of C-sections has been increasing out of proportion to their need. In 1965, when the C-section rate of delivery was first measured, it weighed in at 4.5 percent; in 1996, the rate was 20.7 percent, and the provisional 2006 rate was 31.1 percent of all births – representing a 50 percent increase over fifty years. Meanwhile, VBACs have declined by 72 percent in less than a decade – 28 percent in 1996 to eight percent in 2005.

    The World Health Organization recommends that … cesarean rates … above 15 percent are likely to do more harm than good.

    … While the deadliest risks of VBAC, including uterine rupture, are possible, the risk is limited—impacting less than one percent of patients. Seventy-four percent of VBACs are successful …

    “… VBAC is a reasonable option for most women. Over 75% of women who attempt VBAC will be successful,” “Currently less than 10% of women who have had previous cesareans deliver vaginally in subsequent pregnancies, leading to significant and preventable illness and death.”

    … the NIH panel urged ACOG to reassess its guidelines on VBACs, noting that large swaths of the nation don’t have the resources for hospitals with obstetrics and anesthetics back-up teams.

    Jane Peterson, a certified professional midwife in Wisconsin and a member of the Big Push for Midwives, said that while there are health risks in VBACs, as there is in any birthing experience, it has been shown that the risk increases with more labor interventions, such as induction.

    “Births in birth centers under the midwifery model of care don’t have interventions, and so they have a greater opportunity for success,” Peterson said.

    She added that birth centers screen very carefully for VBACs, ensuring that candidates are healthy. They also make plans to move to traditional facilities if anything occurs that is not reassuring.

    Peterson said she advocates for “complete informed consent” from mothers about the risks and benefits of VBACs—a conversation that is most likely to happen outside a hectic hospital setting.

    “The fix (for poor maternity care in the United States) is to increase access to midwives, not decrease them,” Peterson said …

    … Among only those women who had had a cesarean in the past, 11 percent had a vaginal birth after cesarean for the most recent birth, while 89% had a repeat cesarean. We asked women with a previous cesarean about their decision-making relating to a VBAC and found that 45 percent were interested in the option of a VBAC. We also asked if mothers were given the option of a VBAC, and a clear majority (57 percent) of mothers who had a previous cesarean and were interested in a VBAC were denied that option. We then asked what reason was given for the denial of a VBAC, and the leading responses were unwillingness of their caregiver (45 percent) or the hospital (23 percent), followed by a medical reason unrelated to the prior cesarean in 20 percent of the cases …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    2010 cost of home birth

    The current cost of homebirth in Sydney is somewhere between $3000 and $6000 but the cost may come down after November 2010 if Medicare benefits are extended to antenatal and postnatal care.

    Birthing hospital expenses

    Good question! If you are going through the public system and you have a Medicare card, it is free. If you have a private midwife, the cost can be anywhere between $3000 and $6000 (some private health funds will provide benefits for private midwifery and you may claim the cost via the net medical expenses tax off-set). If you are birthing in a private hospital, many people assume that their private health insurance covers all of the costs and are very surprised when the bills continue to come after the baby has been born. You can expect to pay for a private obstetrician (anywhere between $2000 and $10000 in Sydney), the private health fund excess or co-payment, ultrasounds and tests, paediatrician and anaesthetist fees. As well as incidentals such as parking at the hospital, TV, phone etc.

    Difference in childbirth with midwife and childbirth in a hospital

    Midwives attend all births in hospitals, even if you have an obstetrician.

    First time mothers and homebirth

    What a great decision! Discuss your situation with your midwife for more advice. Generally, first babies are ideal for home births. Why? Many first-time mums have caesareans in the hospital system. It’s about one in three. The rate with homebirth? A mere 5%. Why does this matter? Well, these days it’s very difficult to have a vaginal birth after a caesarean in the hospital system as the hospital system generally does not support VBAC, either covertly or overtly. So it’s really important that you optimise your chance of a natural birth with your first baby. Transfer can be more likely in a first labour, partly for reasons such as a long labour and the woman’s request to transfer for pain relief, or for other reasons such as high blood pressure. Your midwife will guide you as to whether transfer is necessary.

    Hospital midwife compared to private midwives

    A private midwife is bound by the same regulatory mechanisms as a hospital midwife is/ w e are all bound my a code of ethics, code of conduct, competency standards, we are all registered and are bound to comply with the various Acts such as the Poisons Act, coronial law, civil law, criminal law and the nurses and midwives act etc. the main differences between a private midwife and a hospital employed midwife, for you as a pregnant and birthing woman is as follows:

    - hospital midwives have the additional requirement of having to follow hospital policy. What is wrong with this/ some policies are not based on evidence, and some may be out-of-date. This of course creates safety issues for women. the other problem is that people generally don’t like to be treated “routinely”, they like individual care. this is where a private midwife is a real advantage: women can access evidence-based care and are treated as an individual.
    - the other benefit to having a private midwife – the main benefit – is access to continuity of care. private midwives birth with women at home or in hospital, either as a planned hospital birth, or as part of a homebirth transfer. continuity of care is beneficial to women and babies and has advantages such as enhanced breastfeeding rates, increased satisfaction from women with the service, fewer interventions in labour and birth, fewer admissions to the nursery and so on.

    Which is safer for baby repeat c section or vbac?

    This is a good one to discuss with your care provider. For a balanced appraisal, it would be worth seeking a consultation with a private midwife as well. generally speaking, repeat caesarean has risks for the baby in terms of breathing difficulties and later asthma, allergies and diabetes. VBAC on the other hand has a very small – 0.5% – risk of uterine rupture. When this statistic is put into the perspective of other risks with having a baby, it is a very small risk.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    What are the disadvantages of birthing in hospital?

    Most women who birth in hospital do not have the same midwife with them throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal stay. They have different midwives for pregnancy care, then another lot of midwives for the birth (sometimes 3-4, depending on how long the woman is in delivery suite and whether the midwife has a student midwife working with her), followed by another lot of midiwves who work in shifts in postnatal. The lack of continuity means that the woman does not have the opportunity to really develop a deep sense of trust with her own midwife, something that is intrinsic to positive and safe birthing experiences.

    Women who are attended by hospitals have hospital policies drive their care. Policies around induction: when and how it’s done; when a caesarean is done; how often they are to be examined; which women are to be continuously monitored; which babies are to be admitted to the nursery and so on. It’s a bit like checking a box and then applying a treatment or intervention – without first checking if that treatment or intervention is genuinely needed in the woman’s case.

    When women have their own midwife with them – either for hospital, birth centre or home birth, they have the full range of options open to thema nd they are fully informed and able to make their own decisions around pregnancy and birth care.

    birthing options

    To learn more about birthing options, why not come along to the Essential Birth Consulting workshops?

    Can I have a midwife as additional support in pregnancy?

    Absolutely! It’s a great way to supplement and complement the care option that you have chosen. You can have a midwife as additional support whether you’re going to a public or private hospital, and even if you also have a private obstetrician. See here for details of birthing statistics with and without your own midwife.

    midwife medical offset?

    It’s called the net medical expenses tax offset. Contact your registered tax agent or accountant for more advice. my understanding is that once you have $1500 in out-of-pocket medical expenses (doctor’s fees, midwifery, prescriptions, optical, dental etc) you can claim 20% the cost through tax.

    midwifery care fees

    Private midwifery costs somewhere between $3000 and $6000. Essential Birth Consulting has new payment structure where families may choose to pay by the hour, potentially making this the best value midwifery service in Sydney, at around $3000 for a complete package of pregnancy, birth and postnatal care. Birth support is available for around $1500.

    Are there any homebirth classed in sydney?

    Yes! Why not come along to the Essential Birth Consulting workshops?

    access to rebate on midwife visits

    After November this year, women who are planning a hospital birth with a private midwife will be able to claim a medicare benefit for midwifery services. The benefit amount is not known at this stage and it is likely that there may be some out-of-pocket expenses too, but it will bring down the cost once Medicare benefits are payable.

    Are hospital births unnecessary?

    Every woman will need to come to her own conclusions on this one. My opinion is that home is the safest place for a low-risk, healthy woman to birth her baby. Leave hospitals for those who need them! In that case, most women would actually birth at home.

    bowral midwife educator

    I’d recommend Peter Jackson’s Calmbirth classes.

    Can i have an epidural with a midwife?

    Absolutely! Although many women find that they don’t need one when they’re cared for by the same midwife and supported well in labour. My experience has been that the call for an epidural is mostly a call for more support and suggestions for getting though the labour. Epidurals are a good option for some women in some labours.

    Can midwives administer oxytocin at a home birth?

    Yes, if it’s to manage excessive bleeding after the baby is born, but we cannot use it to induce or augment the labour. Those interventions must be attended in the hospital as they carry risks to the baby. Midwives routinely carry oxytocics to births in case they are needed.

    Cost of homebirths in the illlwarra

    Private midwifery costs somewhere between $3000 and $6000. Essential Birth Consulting has new payment structure where families may choose to pay by the hour, potentially making this the best value midwifery service in Sydney, at around $3000 for a complete package of pregnancy, birth and postnatal care.

    Does having gestational diabetes mean a c section?

    This would be a good one to ask your care provider. Generally speaking, gestational diabetes does not automatically mean having a caesarean.

    Private midwife public hospital sydney?

    Yes, it is possible to take your own midwifey with you in a public hospital. This service provides this as an option. Women book with their private midwife, booki into the hospital, receive all of their pregnancy care from their midwife, labour at home as long as possible with their midwife (even having the option of staying home if all is well), head off to hospital when the time is right, and then come home as soon as possible and continue care for 6 weeks. In the hospital, a hospital midwife will also be assigned to you.

    Pprivate midwives in Sydney’s east?

    Yes, this service provides private midwifery services in the eatern suburbs.

    Reasonable obstetricians north shore 2010

    What is reasonable? What is important to you? At the end of thr day, it’s about choosing a care provider who is suited to your needs. As experts in abnormal pregnancy and surgery, obstetricians are ideal care providers for risk-associated pregnancies. If your pregnancy is normal and you prefer a more natural option, midwifery care will best meet your needs. Private midwifery is the oldest form of continuity of midwifery care, however there is a price attached to this model as it is a private service. Public options are free but will lead you down the path of hospital policy and interventions.

    What is the difference in cost between public and private?

    Private has costs attached: obstetrician, paediatrician and anaesthetist fees, private hospital fund excess / co-payment, any other fees and charges from the private hospital (eg TV, phone, parking etc) and also tests and ultrasounds. Public is free if you have a Medicare card.

    Transition into parenthood

    These are highly recommended childbirth education classes that prepare couples well for the changes in pregnancy, birth and parenthood.

    vbac north shore private?

    It’s very unlikely to happen at North Shore Private! Around 5% of the women who have previously had a caesarean go on to have a vaginal birth in that hospital. Private midwifery care – either for home birth or hospital birth – increases that percentage to 80-90%.

    water birth private hospital sydney

    None of the private hospitals in Sydney allow waterbirth. Waterbirth is the norm in a homebirth and may be an option in a public hospital if there are midwives on shift – and baths / pools available – to facilitate this.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Hoped-for drop in childbirth deaths not happening

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Eleven days after her son Benjamin’s birth by C-section, Linda Coale awoke in the middle of the night in pain, one leg badly swollen. Just as her doctor returned her phone call asking what to do, she dropped dead from a blood clot.

    Pregnancy-related deaths like Coale’s appear to have risen nationwide over the past decade, nearly tripling in the state with the most careful count — California. And while they’re very rare … they’re nowhere near as rare as they should be. The maternal mortality rate is four times higher than a goal the federal government set for this year.

    … “Maybe as many as half of these are preventable.”

    Two years after Coale’s death near Annapolis, Md., her sister says topping that list should be warning women about signs of an emergency, like the clot called deep vein thrombosis, or DVT, that can kill if it breaks out of the leg and moves to the lung.

    No mention here of warning women of the risks of caesareans! The majority of which are not necessary and are therefore entirely preventable.

    … A jump in cesarean deliveries that now account for almost a third of births. One in five pregnant women is obese, spurring high blood pressure and diabetes. More women are having babies in their late 30s and beyond.

    … black women are at least three times more likely to die from pregnancy complications than white women, and research is too limited to tell why.

    Then there are the near-misses. For every death, 50 additional women suffer serious complications of pregnancy or delivery …

    At issue are deaths directly related to pregnancy or childbirth, up to 42 days after delivery. In 2006 … there were 13.3 maternal deaths for every 100,000 births. A decade ago, the rate hovered around 7 — and by this year, the U.S. government had hoped to lower it to 3.3 deaths. California in 2006 charted 16.9 maternal deaths for every 100,000 births, up from a rate of 5.6 in 1996.

    How pregnancy-related deaths are coded and counted changed during that time period, but … only about 30 percent of the increase may be due to that.

    At the request of California health officials, Main is finishing an in-depth study of maternal deaths that already has prompted a project to reduce hemorrhage in 30 of the state’s hospitals.

    “Jumping on it early is very important,” says Main, who worries that hospitals can lose track of bleeding that happens a bit at a time until “before you know it, you’ve bled a lot.”

    Among other safety steps:

    * Seek early prenatal care …

    * Hospitals should consider using compression boots on C-section patients …

    * C-sections can be lifesaving but women should understand how to reduce their chances of needing one — because next pregnancies tend to end in C-section, too, and repeat C-sections increase hemorrhage risk. Coming to the hospital before you’re properly dilated or seeking induction before the cervix is ready unnecessarily increases the C-section risk …

    What about saying no to caesareans? Health professionals are not obliged to perform unnecessary surgery!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Panel Urges New Look at Caesarean Guidelines

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A panel of medical experts … recommended steps to reverse a trend that has dismayed many pregnant women: the increasing difficulty of finding doctors and hospitals that will let a woman try to give birth normally if she has had a Caesarean section in the past.

    The new recommendations came at a conference held in Bethesda, Md., by the National Institutes of Health to examine why the rate of … VBAC … has plummeted, to less than 10 percent from 28.3 percent in 1996. The repeat operations are feeding the nation’s overall Caesarean rate of 31.8 percent, which has been rising steadily for the last 11 years.

    “We found … VBAC is certainly a safe alternative for the majority of women who’ve had one prior Caesarean, provided that the incision was horizontal and low on the uterus … About 70 percent of women who have had Caesareans are good candidates for trying for a normal birth, and 60 percent to 80 percent of those who try succeed.

    Private midwives have success rates of 80-90%.

    … for each woman, the decision involves a balancing act between the surgical risks from a repeat Caesarean and the risk of uterine rupture. Data presented at the conference indicated that both risks are very small. Over all, a vaginal birth is safer for the mother, but a scheduled Caesarean is slightly safer for the baby.

    I don’t know how they could have come to this conclusion given that so many caesarean babies have a trip to the nursery for breathing difficulties.

    … this poses a profound ethical dilemma for the woman as well as her caregivers because benefit for the woman may come at the price of increased risk for the fetus and vice versa … the quality of much of the data in this area was poor.

    … Implicit in the document was the conclusion by the panel that VBAC is a reasonable option for low-risk women. I think that’s fabulous.

    But she and others noted that doctors’ fears of malpractice lawsuits lead many to refuse to allow vaginal birth after Caesarean. One speaker mentioned a case of uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after Caesarean in which the baby died and the hospital lost a lawsuit for $35 million. In addition, some insurers threaten to raise premiums if doctors perform vaginal births after Caesareans. In Florida, obstetricians’ premiums are already about $275,000 a year …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Many Women Can Avoid Repeat C-Sections

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Most women who have had a Cesarean delivery can safely have a vaginal delivery … an expert panel concluded …

    Surging C-section rates … have worried experts … just because a woman has had a C-section in the past, there’s no reason she must have one in subsequent deliveries.

    However, current medical practice and fear of lawsuits are major obstacles to encouraging women to have a vaginal delivery after a C-section …

    … Another problem has been … the fact that they have not had access to care where a trial of labor can be offered …

    … “vaginal delivery after Cesarean is certainly a safe alternative for the majority of women who have one prior Cesarean,” …

    … bad outcomes remain rare — … there are about 10 deleterious outcomes for every 100,000 births, vaginal or otherwise.

    … there are no reliable means to spot which women are at risk for complications if they opt for vaginal delivery … [but] … “Pregnancy is … a risky endeavor … women do suffer complications of pregnancy and their babies do have problems. Fortunately these are rare, but they are irrespective of mode of delivery …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Midwives want to meet Roxon to avoid home-birth ban

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A sensationalist title as home birth is not about to be banned but here goes:

    ABI WHITEHAIR is only nine days old but she’s already saved taxpayers thousands of dollars.

    She was delivered at home after her mother, Leah, rejected advice to have a caesarean section … because her first baby … had been born that way …

    A surgical birth – about 30,000 are performed in NSW each year – would have cost the public hospital system about $8000.

    If she had been admitted to a neonatal special care unit, like 70 per cent of babies born by caesarean, including her big brother, it would have cost another $900 a day.

    But her entry to the world, in a Dee Why lounge room, cost taxpayers nothing …

    [Midwives] are calling for another urgent meeting with the Health Minister, Nicola Roxon, before the new rules come into effect in July.

    More than one in three babies in NSW is born by caesarean section but only one in seven subsequent babies are born vaginally due to the risk of uterine rupture.

    The risk is very small: less than one in 200. Most studies on uterine rupture include dehiscenses, which are not complete ruptures, have no symptoms and do not cause any problems for mother or baby.

    About 95,000 babies were born in NSW in 2008, but only 258 were born vaginally in public hospitals after a previous caesarean …

    It is well-known that VBAC is far more successful – around 90% – with private midwifery care. Otherwise the chance of a siccessful VBAC can be as low as 3%.

    … women who had undergone traumatic births, with extensive intervention, were eager to avoid a repeat performance but were often left with little choice.

    ”Keeping away from obstetric intervention by having a home birth is the best chance they have of achieving a normal vaginal birth,” …

    Up to 70 per cent of home births were by women who had previously delivered by caesarean and there was a growing band who would deliver at home alone if home births were outlawed.

    … Ms Whitehair, who had longed for a natural birth, spent months researching a home delivery. Abi’s birth, attended by two private midwives, cost her almost $5000 but was ”beautiful and textbook”.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    How long before my due date will my elective caesarean be performed?

    Elective caesareans should not be performed before 39 weeks unless there is a genuine reason to do so. This helps the baby’s lungs to mature.

    Are there any breathing issues for babies who are born by cesarean?

    Yes, breathing difficulties are more common in babies who are born by caesarean. They are not primed by breathing as they are with a vaginal birth, and the fluid in their lungs isn’t squeezed out as is the case with a vaginal birth. As well as this, ceasar babies are more prone to asthma in childhood and adulthood.

    What are the pros and cons of caesareans?

    I don’t believe there are any benefits to major surgery without sound reason. There are many potential issues with caesareans:
    - increased blood loss
    - infections
    - blood clots
    - poor wound healing
    - adhesions inside
    - increased chance of miscarriage
    - lower rate of fertility
    - higher chance of tubal (ectopic) pregnancy
    - lower chance of ever having a vaginal birth after a caesarean
    - increased pain in the recovery period
    - poorer bonding
    - more breastfeeding problems
    - risks associated with anaesthetics

    What does it cost to have an obstetrician in Sydney?

    Anywhere between $2000 and $10,000.

    What does it cost to have a midwife for a home delivery in Sydney?

    Usually around $3000 – $5000. This represents fantastic value for money: midwives see their clients for 1-2 hours for each pregnancy visit, they’re there throughout the labour and of course visit the family for 6 weeks after the new arrival has come.

    What are the vbac rates in australian hospitals?

    Fairly low! Anywhere between 1% and about 30%. The average is around 15%.

    Can i have a water birth after a cesarean?

    Yes, but you’ll need to choose your care provider wisely. I’d recommend a private midwife. Most hospitals will not officially “allow” a waterbirth.

    What is the best hospital in sydney for a natural childbirth?

    The best place for a natural birth is not hospital. Home is the best environment for a natural birth, cared for by a private midwife. Your midwife will refer you into hospital if there are any problems, but most home births go very smoothly.

    Can I have a home birth after IVF?

    Absolutely!

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQS

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Why are are home births with a mid wife preferred over a hospital delivery?

    There are many benefits to birthing at home and having a midwife provide your care. The following pages will explain more about the benefits of birthing at home:

    http://www.essentialbirthconsulting.com.au/home-birth.html

    http://www.essentialbirthconsulting.com.au/home-birth/home-birth-benefits.html

    I had a bad first birthing experience and I’m now waiting for my second baby.

    It’s important to debrief your birth experience to help you to gain clarity around what happened and to explore strategies for helping the same situation to not happen again. Birth debriefing can also help you to choose a care provider who can support what it is you need for your second birth.

    What are the benefits of having my baby with a midwife?

    There are many benefits:
    - Have the same care provider all the way through your pregnancy, birth and postnatal period
    - Lower rates of intevention such as forceps, vacuum, episiotomy, induction, epidural
    - More likely to breastfeed successfully
    - Have continuous support from your midwife throughout labour
    - Babies generally experience gentler births

    What proportion of women birth at home with midwife?

    Australia-wide, around 0.3%. In NSW, it’s around 0.2%. The low rate of homebirth is related to several factors:
    - Homebirth is not actively supported by our health system, and hence it is not offered as an option to women when they see their GPs when they become pregnant.
    - There is a perception that home birth is something only “hippies” or “alternative” people do. This could not be further from the truth!
    - The cost of homebirth is prohibitive for some families as it is totally privately funded.
    - In some areas, there are no midwives available.

    Is it possible to contract a private midwife for postnatal care only?

    Yes! Essential Birth Consulting provides postnatal care independent of birthing services.

    Are there any VBAC friendly doctors at north shore private?

    VBAC rates at North Shore Private are around 5% or lower and this is reflective of the obstetricians who practice there. Conversely, private midwives have VBAC rates as high as 90%. Obstetricians are surgicial specialists; midwives are specialists in normal, natural birth. If you’re after a normal birth (VBAC), you’re best to choose a care provider who specialises in this.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    FAQs

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    informed consent and childbirth

    Every woman who is competent to consent, has the right to refuse any or all professional care. Informed consent must be obtained prior to any procedure being performed.

    how to minimise labour intervention in a hospital?

    The best way to minimise intervention in a hospital is to be as well informed as you can possible be about all things related to pregnancy, labour, birth, breastfeeding and babies. Read widely, attend independent childbirth education classes and consider employing a private midwife to be with you throughout your labour. She can help you to decide if the proposed interventions are necessary in your situation, she can support you emotionally, mentally and physically and she can aso help to ensure that your birth plan is respected without a fuss.

    Do any independent midwives in Sydney offer prenatal care for women who are planning to freebirth?

    Yes! This service enables women to access antenatal care from a midwife without the midwife attending the birth. Postnatal care is available if needed.

    Do you think there are advantages to continuous monitoring for low-risk women

    In a word, no. Intermittent auscultation is the method of choice. Continuous monitoring will increase the chance of a caesarean with no benefit to the mother or baby.

    How much is a private midwife

    Prices range from $3000 – $6000. Melissa Maimann offers for her clients to pay by the hour, making the service one of the cheapest.

    What is a good caesarean rate?

    The World Health Organisation recommends that no more than 15% births need to be caesareans. The WHO argues that when caesarean rates exceed 15%, the risks to the mother and baby increase on the whole. You’ll be hard-pressed to find a hospital with a caesarean rate of less than 15%, but birth centres and private midwives have caresarean rates of less than 10-15%.

    What is the best hospital in sydney for delivering babies?

    It all depends what sort of birth experience you’re after! If you’re wanting a natural birth, home birth will be the best option. If you want a natural birth in a hospital setting, the best options would be birth centre or private midwifery care for a planned hospital birth. If you’re wanting to have intervention in your birth, a hospital birth would be best. If you choose an obstetrician, you’re far more likely to have a caesarean, episiotomy, epidural, forceps or vacuum. Choosing your care provider is the single most important decision you will make in birthing.

    Is there a birth centre at westmead hospital?

    No, there isn’t. If you’re after a natural birth, the best choice would be a home birth.

    C section or natural delivery midwife?

    Midwves cannot perform caesareans. If a caesarean was needed, the midwife would call a doctor in to perform it. Most caesareans that are performed are unnecessary and increase the risks to the mother and baby. A natural birth is the safest way to birth, and midwives are qualified specialists in natural birth.

    giving birth after birth trauma

    Private midwifery care will be really important so that you can have the same midwife all the way through pregnancy, birth and postnatally. It’s also important to debrief your last experience and come to a place where you feel safe to birth again.

    high risk midwife sydney

    Midwives are not qualified to care for high risk pregnancies. We refer these women onto obstetricians. In most cases, one or two consultations is all that is needed with the obstetrician and the midwife continues the care of the woman.

    how many births proceed naturally

    What a great question! It all depends what care provider you choose and where you have your baby. You see, if you choose a private midwife and birth at home, you have about a 95% chance of having a vaginal birth. If you birth in a private hospital, you have about a 33% chace of having an unassisted vaginal birth. In some hospitals, the caesarean rate is more than the vaginal birth rate! Sad but true.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Health experts: Most repeat C-sections unnecessary

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Michelle Williams is three months’ pregnant and determined to experience childbirth the way nature intended. But because her previous baby was delivered through … cesarean section — she has to travel more than an hour … to find an obstetrician willing to let her try for a vaginal birth.

    One out of every three pregnant women now has a C-section …

    This is also the case in Australia.

    The skyrocketing C-section rate has been hotly debated in birthing and medical communities, yet little attention has been paid to one of the consequences: Once a woman has a C-section, she often has to fight to deliver subsequent babies the old-fashioned way …

    This is also the case in Australia. VBAC rates nationally are around 15%.

    Repeat C-sections have become so routine that 90 percent of pregnant women who have the surgery give birth that way again. That is a concern to health experts, who say vaginal births after a cesarean, or VBACs, should be far more common.

    Successful VBACs result in better health outcomes for the mother and the baby … VBACs [should] be offered in low-risk cases.

    … although the attempt carries a risk of uterine rupture, the chance it will happen is relatively low: 0.5 percent. Meanwhile, C-sections carry all the risks of a major surgery. Compared with having a vaginal birth, a woman delivering by C-section experiences more physical problems, longer recovery and more emotional issues on average … babies born by cesarean are less likely to be breastfed and more likely to experience breathing problems at birth and asthma as they get older.

    Yet the VBAC rate, 9.2 percent, is a far cry from the objective set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 37 percent. In Illinois, the rate was 11 percent in 2008, down from 38.6 percent a decade earlier.

    … In northwest Illinois, the VBAC rate is as low as 3.9 percent …

    Not dissimilar to some of our hospitals here in Australia.

    … 73 percent of the women who try VBACs are successful.

    Success rates are around 70%-80%, but they are higher, up to 90%, if the woman chooses a private midwife.

    “The liability issue is huge,” said Dr. Joseph Pavese, chairman of the obstetrics department at Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn, where 97 percent of pregnant women with a previous C-section have another one. “Parents expect good outcomes, and physicians are reluctant to try difficult deliveries. If the baby is not perfect, there is possible litigation.”

    … If the scar opens during labor, it would require an emergency C-section. Certain factors — induction of labor, or a vertical (rather than horizontal) incision — can increase the risk of rupture.

    In 99.5 percent of the cases, nothing goes awry. But if the scar gives way, results can be catastrophic; the baby has a 10 percent chance of dying or suffering brain damage.

    Over the years, “The risk of uterine rupture has not changed,” said Dr. Howard Strassner, director of maternal and fetal medicine at Rush University Medical Center. “What has changed is individual tolerance for risk. It reached the point where no one wants to be associated with an adverse outcome.”

    … more recent and balanced research showing VBACs are as safe — if not safer — than repeat C-sections hasn’t had the same effect [as previous research that demonstrated that elective repeat caesarean was safer than VBAC.]

    … What crippled the idea of a VBAC, however, was a simple word change. In 1998, ACOG advised that physicians should be “readily available” to provide emergency care because of the dangers of a uterine rupture. Eight months later, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists changed the wording to “immediately available,” and many small hospitals in rural areas stopped doing VBACs.

    We have the same situation in Australia, with many smaller hospitals and midwife-led units not offering VBAC services.

    Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital in Dixon, which handles about 365 deliveries a year, was one of more than a dozen Illinois hospitals that subsequently dropped VBACs because an on-site anesthesiologist wasn’t always immediately available.

    “… too many women are subject to coerced cesareans because hospitals have banned VBACs.”

    … Mariana Patzelt … had two previous C-sections, planned to drive from her home … to deliver her third baby … after laboring too long at home in hopes of reducing her chances of a C-section, she ended up delivering in the emergency room of a nearby hospital.

    When doctors there asked whether she had had any previous surgeries, she said no.

    “The whole time I was hoping they didn’t see the scar,” she said. “I knew if I would have said yes, it would have blown my chances and I wouldn’t be able to fight hard enough for everything I worked for.

    “Hospitals treat birth as a medical condition, a disease they have to fix rather than something natural we’ve been doing since the beginning of time.”…

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Vaginal birth OK after multiple C-sections

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … Women who attempt vaginal childbirth after having several babies by cesarean section may not have a greater risk of complications than women who’ve had only one prior C-section …

    … vaginal delivery is now considered a safe option for many women who have had a past C-section. Because C-sections also carry risks and downsides — such as blood loss or infection from the procedure, and a longer hospital stay and recovery time — many women may prefer a try at labor.

    … the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) does not currently recommend vaginal delivery for women who have had three or more C-sections, as their risk of uterine rupture has generally been thought to be higher.

    In the new study … researchers found that women with at least three prior C-sections showed no increased risk of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery.

    In fact, none of the 89 women who opted to try vaginal childbirth had the complication …

    … the expected rate of uterine rupture among women with one prior C-section would be less than 1 percent …

    … The … women who chose to … labor also had no instances of bladder or bowel injury, or lacerations of the uterine artery … compared with just over 2 percent of the women who had a repeat C-section …

    When it came to successful [VBAC] the chances were similar regardless of the number of prior C-sections.

    [Ampngst women who had one prior caesarean, the] success rate [was] about 75 percent. That rate was 80 percent among women with a history of three or more C-sections …

    Research has been around for several years now about the safety of VBAMC. Despite this, women still have a battle on their hands to achieve a VBAMC in the hospital system. While many hospitals support VBAC after one caesarean, successful VBAMC rates are very low. Hopefully this new research will add to the growing body of research that supports VBAMC as a safe option. I believe that VBAMC is a safer option than elective repeat caesarean. While the first caesarean is generally safe, the risks increase after two or more caesareans. The best way to achieve a VBAC or VBAMC in the hospital system is with a private midwife.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Do We Need To Revisit VBAC Guidelines For Women With Three Or More Prior Caesareans?

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    … women with three or more prior caesareans who attempt vaginal birth have similar rates of success and risk for maternal morbidity as those with one prior caesarean, and similar overall morbidity … as those delivered by elective repeat caesarean.

    Planned vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) refers to any woman who has experienced a prior caesarean birth who intends to try for a vaginal birth rather than to deliver by elective repeat caesarean. Although relatively low complication rates, including uterine rupture, have been demonstrated among women with two prior low-transverse caesareans who attempt vaginal birth, there are very limited data available on outcomes among women with more than two prior caesareans …

    … researchers sought to estimate the rate of success and risk of maternal morbidity in women with three or more prior caesareans who attempt VBAC … A total of 25,005 women who had a least one prior caesarean delivery were included.

    … women with three or more prior caesarean deliveries did not experience a difference in morbidity based on whether they attempted VBAC or elected for a repeat caesarean. The 89 women with three or more prior caesareans who attempted VBAC were as likely to be successful as women with one or two prior caesareans, 79.8% compared to 75.5% and 74.6% respectively. In addition, none of them experienced significant maternal morbidity such as uterine rupture, uterine artery laceration, and bladder or bowel injury.

    … precluding VBAC for all women with three or more prior caesareans may not be evidence based. Although there is a measurable maternal morbidity associated with delivery for a woman with a history of three or more prior caesareans, it does not differ significantly by mode of delivery. Risks associated with multiple caesareans are several, including surgical morbidity and abnormal placentation in future pregnancies.

    … perhaps it is time to revisit the current recommendations for VBAC attempts for women with more than one prior caesarean”.

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Girl, 13, starved of oxygen at birth to receive millions

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email Melissa Maimann or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    Alice … was starved of oxygen during the final hour of her mother’s labour after doctors failed to warn her mother that there were risks associated with her second birth.

    Diagnosed with spastic quadraplegic cerebral palsy, she has severely delayed mental development as well as learning difficulties and is now reliant on 24 hour care.

    Her mother Carolyn had a caesarean section with her first child but doctors … did not tell her that there was a chance the womb would rupture during a normal delivery.

    Lawyers for the Joyce family … claimed Alice would have been born healthy if delivered by caesarean …

    … Her father … said: “Although it sounds like a large sum of money it is needed to fund Alice’s around the clock care and ensure she gets as much out of life as her disabilities allow.

    … A court ruling today is expected to award Alice a lump sum payment of £2,250,000 plus annual payments until she is 16 of £95,000 pounds and £185,000 after that for the rest of her life.

    The case was funded through legal aid, without which the family would not have been able to afford legal costs to prove negligence or the experts needed to prove her complex needs.

    … Chief nurse and director of patient care standards Sarah Watson-Fisher said: “We would like to express our sincere apologies to Alice and her family for the errors in the care given at the time of her birth …

    “We take matters like this very seriously and are committed to learning from our mistakes. We hope that the settlement will be of great assistance to Alice and we offer her and her family our best wishes for the future.”

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Surge in caesarean deliveries levels off

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    THE rate of caesarean deliveries in Australia has levelled off for the first time in 10 years, after growing alarm over the costs and risks associated with the procedure.

    … Australia’s caesarean rate in 2007 was 30.9 per cent — an increase of only 0.1 percentage point from the previous year.

    That marks a dramatic slowdown on the strong growth seen in previous years …

    … The report found a much higher rate of caesarean births among first-time mothers, at 32 per cent, than among mothers who had already had at least one child.

    … more than 80 per cent of women who have given birth by caesarean section had a further caesarean delivery …

    … possible explanations for the levelling off in caesareans included changing community attitudes and a greater awareness among women and doctors of the risks.

    … “… women are becoming more informed about their choices, more aware and more educated, and women are exercising that right to make a choice” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448

    Health Plans Work to Reduce the Health Risks and Costs From Elective C-Sections Before Full Term

    Interested in home birth, hospital birth or private midwifery care? Questions or comments? Email me or call 0400 418 448.

    Link

    A combination of quality-of-care and cost issues has prompted some health plans to take steps to reduce the number of scheduled, medically unnecessary premature Caesarean section deliveries, mainly through a focus on education of both women and physicians.

    … a growing percentage of women is having C-sections, many of which take place before the 39th week of gestation … between 1990 and 2005 there was a 20% increase in babies born before the 37th week of gestation and a 29% increase in births occurring at 37 to 39 weeks of gestation. Many studies show heightened risks to both babies and mothers when the babies are delivered before 39 weeks.

    Although there are certainly medically necessary reasons for some of these C-sections, newborns delivered prematurely are at risk for more medical complications than those born at full term. Many of these infants are admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, which can be much more costly for health plans than a C-section or vaginal birth without NICU admission.

    There were more than 1.3 million C-sections in 2006 in the U.S., up from less than 800,000 in 1996 … plans have asked what they can do about this growing rate … “This is not the important question, but it’s the one everyone asks,” she maintains. Rather, she says, the focus should be on what these high C-section rates represent, which is a quality issue mainly with babies and the impact of neonatal costs. “The real quality issue has more to do with the infant than the mom,” …

    “This is both a quality-of-care and a cost issue,” … “A baby should not be born electively before 39 weeks unless there is a clinical indication” to do so … while NICU costs “are not the No. 1 issue … they are in the top couple of issues,” she explains. Average costs for a vaginal delivery are between $5,000 and $6,000, while costs for a C-section delivery are in the $8,000 to $9,000 range. But for births resulting in a NICU stay, those costs jump to the $20,000 to $30,000 range …

    … “While maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy may result in the need for a C-section, we’re concerned that some early C-section deliveries may be occurring for non-medically indicated reasons,”

    … “the rates of adverse respiratory outcomes, mechanical ventilation, newborn sepsis, hypoglycemia, admission to the neonatal ICU, and hospitalization for 5 days or more were increased by a factor of 1.8 to 4.2 for births at 37 weeks and 1.3 to 2.1 for births at 38 weeks.”

    … late preterm babies — … between 34 and 36 weeks gestation — are six times more likely than full-term babies to die within their first week of life and three times more likely to die within their first year. Groat says that babies born within the 37- and 38-week time frame “have twice the likelihood of going to the NICU” than babies born at 39 weeks.

    … If women have already had a C-section, they can safely have a … VBAC later…

    … Many plans are taking steps to help reduce the amount of scheduled premature C-sections.

    … 48% of babies admitted to the NICU were born to mothers who had scheduled deliveries, many of which were before 39 weeks gestation. After the plan shared its data with the hospitals and physicians in those areas, there was a 46% decrease in NICU admissions within the first three months … “We’re taking some of the best practices and sharing them with hospitals,” she explains. … “the last few weeks of pregnancy are important to the baby,” …

    … The Regence Group has a maternity management program, Special Beginnings, designed to promote a healthy pregnancy and delivery. “… we work to educate expectant mothers about the potential incremental risks to mother and infant” when the baby is delivered by C-section electively before the 39th week of gestation … “Through this program, we educate expectant mothers on the benefits of full-term, vaginal delivery to help encourage a healthy pregnancy and delivery. We also educate them about when it may be medically indicated to not have a vaginal birth.” … It also offers members a 24-hour health information line that includes mortality and morbidity information affecting both mothers and babies with elective delivery before 39 weeks … “This helps educate the mother if her doctor suggests early delivery,” …

    Melissa Maimann, Essential Birth Consulting 0400 418 448